[HN Gopher] Wireless Is a Trap
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Wireless Is a Trap
        
       Author : behnamoh
       Score  : 51 points
       Date   : 2022-05-12 19:10 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.benkuhn.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.benkuhn.net)
        
       | adamch wrote:
       | This is really noticeable with video chat. I never use Bluetooth
       | when talking with my family... between the Texas - Australia lag
       | and the Bluetooth headphones - Android phone lag, it's enough to
       | impair conversation.
       | 
       | Now the problem is just how to manage all the cables that come
       | from having a gaming PC and work laptop that use the same
       | keyboard and monitor. I have a KVM switch but I can't hide it
       | under the desk if I want to press it.
        
       | nerdbaggy wrote:
       | AX has BSSID Coloring which really helps improve performance when
       | multiple APs are on the same channel. Still have the saturated
       | channel limitation but that rarely happens on 5Ghz
       | 
       | https://www.extremenetworks.com/extreme-networks-blog/how-do...
        
       | areoform wrote:
       | I bought a Homepod Mini on sale some time ago, and it's one of
       | the worst experiences I've ever had. It continuously stutters. It
       | stops working. I realize just how magical it is that it works at
       | all. But the realization that it needs WiFi to stream music to,
       | despite having bluetooth, has been quite depressing. I don't
       | think the product will ever work without jitter given the amount
       | of overlapping WiFi signals in my area.
       | 
       | It's a bit like the butterfly keyboard of speakers. A wonderful
       | idea in theory. But it makes you wonder if anyone at Apple has
       | ever tried using it an apartment building, a dusty environment,
       | or some place that isn't a pristine lab or upper middle class
       | suburbia
        
       | qq66 wrote:
       | I wanted wired Ethernet in my office but didn't want to punch
       | holes in the wall. Luckily I have an old "central vacuum system"
       | that as far as I can tell has never been even powered on, many
       | years before I bought the house.
       | 
       | I tied a ping pong ball to a piece of string and used a vacuum
       | cleaner to suck it through the pipes, then used the string to
       | pull a stronger rope and then the Ethernet cable. So now my
       | Ethernet goes from my office to the wireless router via the
       | vacuum ducting.
        
         | wpietri wrote:
         | Now that's a proper series of tubes.
        
         | robotnikman wrote:
         | Other alternatives I've found to work are Ethernet over power
         | (varies depending on how well your house is wired though) and
         | ethernet over coax using MoCA adapters (if your house was
         | previously wired with coax for cable TV these work great)
        
           | bin_bash wrote:
           | MoCA adapters are crazy expensive though
        
       | alexvoda wrote:
       | It's too late now. We are already entering the age of laptops
       | without headphone jacks.
       | 
       | If only people listened earlier.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Wired would be so much better if it were just a replacement for
       | wireless, where you just plug a wire between two points, and they
       | start communicating without any configuration necessary if the
       | two points already had a wireless communication going.
        
         | falcolas wrote:
         | It... usually does? For example, I can plug in an ethernet
         | cable to my router and computer, and it works perfectly fine.
         | And if I unplug, it's still connected, just by wifi.
        
       | layer8 wrote:
       | TIL why Bluetooth is called Bluetooth:
       | 
       | > It was the epithet of King Harald Bluetooth, who united the
       | disparate Danish tribes into a single kingdom; Kardach chose the
       | name to imply that Bluetooth similarly unites communication
       | protocols.
       | [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Name_and_logo]
       | 
       | Another thing, not mentioned in the article, is that microwave
       | ovens tend to interfere with Bluetooth in my experience.
        
         | kQq9oHeAz6wLLS wrote:
         | Tom Scott had one of his usual informative videos on this
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/VdmQp9M9jUo
        
         | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
         | Not just your experience. I worked for a company that made a
         | lot of wireless devices. We had a pretty open-plan office and
         | learned not to test anything around lunchtime.
         | 
         | Seriously. There were many times that I was working on
         | something that suddenly had a spike in the receive failure rate
         | and I'd look at the time and realize that somebody was heating
         | up their lunch in the microwave.
        
         | JonathonW wrote:
         | And WiFi. And anything else that might happen to operate in the
         | 2.4 GHz ISM band (like some cordless phones, back in the day).
        
         | falcolas wrote:
         | It absolutely does. Especially if folks are in the habit of
         | opening the door before the microwave shuts itself down.
        
       | wwweston wrote:
       | This is one reason why I'm still down on Apple's decision to
       | remove 1/8" audio jacks from iPhones: they took away a decades
       | old "just works" standard that wasn't subject to interference or
       | battery or latency issues and replaced it with something that
       | fundamentally is. Their efforts at filing down the sharp edges
       | here with the airpods (and have done as well as anyone could
       | expect) don't change the fundamentals.
       | 
       | "Get a dongle" -- maybe I will when I finally give up my original
       | iPhone SE, but I'm not going to be cheerful about paying an extra
       | $30 for the privilege along with the overhead of keeping track of
       | an additional thing.
        
         | TimTheTinker wrote:
         | If I'm not mistaken, removing the 1/8" audio jacks was
         | significant in enabling the IP67+ water resistance ratings
         | iPhones have these days.
         | 
         | That rating comes in handy for those who have butter fingers
         | like me and drop their phones in water once in a while.
        
           | ozfive wrote:
           | Couldn't a rubber gasket on the 1/8" jack help with water
           | resistance?
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | _I 'm not going to be cheerful about paying an extra $30_
         | 
         | $9. Not $30. If you're going to grind a three-year-old axe, at
         | least get your figures right.
         | 
         | https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MMX62AM/A/lightning-to-35...
        
           | samatman wrote:
           | I wish I had only bought three of those tiny things...
           | finally ended up sugruing one of them to the lav mic.
        
       | doommius wrote:
       | Yup. Also just mostly wireless equipment is super low quality.
       | It's easy to see this when living downtown in any larger city.
       | You'll easily be competing with 100s of other APs for the 2.4 ghz
       | wireless band. With tbr 5 and 6 ghz this is getting better but
       | there still isn't nearly enough channels.
        
       | nl wrote:
       | This "managed cables on my desk" is reason enough to stick with
       | wireless.
        
       | modeless wrote:
       | USB-C hubs or monitors with power delivery make this really easy
       | these days. One cable gets you everything. Power, display(s),
       | mouse/keyboard, Ethernet, and any other peripherals you need.
       | It's absolutely worth getting a USB Ethernet adapter. They work
       | way better than WiFi.
       | 
       | A wireless mouse is still worth it though. Logitech G305 is
       | essentially perfect IMO. Extremely reliable, extremely low
       | latency, months of battery life, reasonable price.
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | > _Most Bluetooth headsets introduce around 150-300ms of latency
       | (the time between my computer receiving the audio from the
       | Internet, and the sound coming out of the headphones)_
       | 
       | I must have an incredible $10 BT speaker (used for quiet TV
       | listening at night). I don't see any delay versus the regular
       | audio (plan old 1/8" audio jack out of Android box, to stereo).
       | You would notice 150-300 ms as serious lip synch issue.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-12 23:00 UTC)