[HN Gopher] Congress urged to ease immigration for foreign scien... ___________________________________________________________________ Congress urged to ease immigration for foreign science talent Author : JSeymourATL Score : 58 points Date : 2022-05-15 21:14 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.axios.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.axios.com) | pm90 wrote: | Important to note that the proposal is to lift green card caps on | PHD holders. Certainly not opening any "floodgates". | immigrantheart wrote: | I thought US immigration system is not geared toward helping US | competitiveness, but diversity and family reunification. | | Besides, PhDs in other countries like say, Indonesia for example, | won't be as good as PhDs in other first world countries. | | The second/third order effects would be that these opens up for | immigration/education fraud from countries which populations | really want to go to the US. I can already imagine. | | Can the US job market absorb for these PhDs? | hardwaresofton wrote: | I wonder if this is the thing YC/Seibel was working on | tejtm wrote: | we are on the verge of having to pay our own, | | (sorry for the snark, and I do welcome any efforts that decrease | antiscience attitudes) | curiousllama wrote: | Are STEM PhDs in the private sector struggling? | HarryHirsch wrote: | Around 2000, in Chemical & Engineering News, the organ of the | American Chemical Society, there were 12 - 15 pages of job | ads, a good chunk industrial. Now there are maybe 3 - 4 | pages, most academic. Friend, you have no clue how much | better it used to be! | qaq wrote: | Can it be that between 2000 and 2022 there was a shift to | Linkedin and other resources as a primary place for the | commercial job ads? | jleyank wrote: | PhD chemist hiring is about the best it's been since the | 60's. It's just that paper media aren't in the workflow | anymore. | HarryHirsch wrote: | It's picking up again but isn't anywhere near mid-1990's | level. | whimsicalism wrote: | The government thinks our salaries are too high | FooBarBizBazz wrote: | If you listen to what the Fed says, it actually does. It thinks | unemployment is too low. | wyldfire wrote: | The companies that hire these engineers either pay them to work | there or pay them to work here. So you are competing with them | regardless. But the US can benefit from both migrant farm | workers and skilled laborer immigrants. And unless you're one | of the few natives in the US, your ancestors got the same | benefit. Let's just let them immigrate here and then we get the | benefit of their expertise and their culture. | geraldwhen wrote: | This is patently false. Beyond a certain headcount you run | into regulatory issues in India and China. And the timezone | issue alone makes a lot of work untenable. | [deleted] | Sakos wrote: | How about Congress ensuring better pay for their existing | population? | qaq wrote: | You do realize that leading world in R&D is a prerequisite to | having high paying jobs? | curiousllama wrote: | You mean by pouring money into the sectors where these | immigrants would theoretically work? | | > China competition bills passed in the last year by the House | and Senate seek to pour money into the National Science | Foundation and other federal research agencies. They also seek | to incentivize high-tech companies, especially those that | manufacture semiconductors, to build facilities in the U.S. | | Looks like they're on it. | [deleted] | mpyne wrote: | If immigrants are coming into fill high-paying jobs, then by | definition there is already an ability for the existing | population to get better pay: fill those high-paying jobs! | | That is already accounted for in programs like H1B. If the job | remains high-paying even with H1Bs then we clearly have room | for more people to join the labor market, including immigrants. | geraldwhen wrote: | H1b workers depress wages by increasing the supply of | workers. | | Most h1bs I work with have no more experience, and some less, | than a graduating CS major with no prior job experience. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Also by being restricted to one employer so the H1B worker | cannot sell their labor to the highest bidder. | qaq wrote: | You do realize that most decent size US companies have | presence in EU, Canada, India etc. and can easily shift | open racks to those offices (and they actively do). As an | example Apple has doubled it's head count in Cork Ireland a | few times. | the_only_law wrote: | What makes me suspicious is that everyone in many of "the | sciences" is very sure to note that there very little room in | the labor market. | ceeplusplus wrote: | H1B is broken. Most H1B's that come in are sweat shop / | "consulting" workers that get paid low, worked to the bone, | and don't really have a differentiated skillset to current US | residents. People who actually have differentiated skills get | fucked by the lottery or get forced to get a Master's/PhD to | have a better chance. | aspaceman wrote: | American workers are paid plenty. They're just useless and | incompetent. That's why we get people with actual skills from | countries with real education systems. | xwdv wrote: | wreath wrote: | Can you elaborate on why is that? | whatshisface wrote: | Because they are American-educated and a demographic can't | beat themselves. | rebelos wrote: | I've got a news flash for you about the scientists that America | is educating... | sharkster711 wrote: | Most American educated scientists aren't American, unless | that's what you meant. | curiousllama wrote: | > Current U.S. immigration law limits the number of green cards | issued per country, and people from populous countries like India | and China are disproportionately affected. | | It still shocks me how many of my friends from $top_US_university | got kicked out of the country (or almost did, saved only by | marriage). Like, do we really want to kick out a half-Iranian | nuclear engineer, who now wants to work as a SWE, because they | were born in India? | | I get that we can't open the flood gates. But it _does_ make a | bit of sense to retain the top % of immigrants based on education | in scarce fields, no? | runarberg wrote: | > I get that we can't open the flood gates | | Serious question, has this ever been shown to be a concern. If | we would open for free migration, is there seriously any reason | to think that migration would be so intense that the country | wouldn't be able to handle it? | | I ask because I seriously doubt it. Historically migration has | been pretty liberal, and there are place which offer free | movements of people (e.g. the EU) where opening up the borders | (or the flood gates if you will) has turned out to be a great | success. | historia_novae wrote: | Fell free to ask any Native American to get an insightful | answer to this question. | LudwigNagasena wrote: | > If we would open for free migration, is there seriously any | reason to think that migration would be so intense that the | country wouldn't be able to handle it? | | Depends on what you think "be able to handle it" means. There | are many tradeoffs. | | > there are place which offer free movements of people (e.g. | the EU) where opening up the borders (or the flood gates if | you will) has turned out to be a great success | | The EU has a very strict immigration policy for people | outside of the EU and it also has natural language barriers | that bar foreigners from almost all jobs. | daenz wrote: | I googled our immigration backlog, and according to multiple | sources[0], the current number of pending immigration | applications is 10M. These are people who are willing to fill | out the applications and wait. It's not unreasonable to | assume that this is the tip of the iceberg, and that there | there are many more people who don't bother to apply because | of the processing times and likelihood of getting in. Suppose | there are 5x more people who would instantly migrate if | immigration was completely open. That's about 17% of the | current US population. | | That seems like a lot of people for local communities to | absorb, especially if these are people that require a lot of | financial assistance. | | 0. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/us-immigration- | backl... | lambda wrote: | Why are you assuming that folks will require a lot of | financial assistance? | daenz wrote: | I would be assuming if I said "especially because", not | "especially if" | ajsnigrutin wrote: | "Great success" is relative... | | In my small EU country, this has created a caste of low- | paying jobs that only immigrants do, and the hiring process | usually goes along "put out an ad, offer minimum pay" - | "noone local wants to do that job for minimum wage" - | "complain you can't get workers" - "get work visas for | foreigners". | | This would/could be mitigated by raising the minimum wage for | foreign workers (eg., you need a cleaning lady, the pay for a | foreign worker must be atleast 1.5x the average pay currently | working cleaning ladies get, so they'll try to get a local | for atleast 1.499x the average pay first and then if really | desparate hire a foreigner). | lambda wrote: | We have plenty of the low-paying jobs that only immigrants | do in the US as well. | | Some are via temporary work visas, some are via | undocumented immigrants. The fact that they are | undocumented immigrants means that they have very few legal | protections, which makes it a lot easier for employers to | exploit them. | aaomidi wrote: | If you also pay immigrants well, they actually integrate | well. | | A huge barrier to integration is lack of social mobility. | Europe hasn't really closed the class gap between Europeans | and immigrants (either economic immigrants, or escaping a | shit country immigrant) | ajsnigrutin wrote: | But if you pay well, you also get the locals to do the | job. | | I know higly educated people in demand (scientists, | engineers,...) are well paid anywhere, but "free | immigration" would bring in a lot of people, bringing a | lot of jobs down to minimum wage or even lower. | Swizec wrote: | > I get that we can't open the flood gates | | There is no flood of immigrants waiting for the gates to open. | American net migration is trending down. Soon there will be | more people leaving than coming. | | Besides, leaving your country is hard and a large majority of | people aren't actually that interested. Especially not for a | place like USA when other, nicer, places have strong economies | too. | | https://econofact.org/the-decline-in-u-s-net-migration | | Personally I moved here for the tech industry. But there's | really not much else the US has going for it. | usrn wrote: | People leaving would ease asset price inflation relative to | wages, especially housing which has been a crisis here for a | while. | sbelskie wrote: | The decrease in net migration has everything to do with COVID | + and embarrassing inability to process green card and other | immigration related backlogs and almost nothing to do with | there not being enough people willing to migrate here. At | worst there are tens of millions of people who would migrate | here; upper estimates are around 750 million, though that is | only based on stated intention AFAIK and the real number | would likely be lower. | mschuster91 wrote: | > I get that we can't open the flood gates. | | Actually: why _not_? This is how the US has operated for | centuries after all, not to mention that treating immigrants as | a natural disaster ( "flood") is a talking point established by | the anti-immigrant far-right. | | It's disturbing to see how the far right has managed to pervert | the core of the identity of the US and the core values on which | the EU was founded. Both the US and the EU are now, first and | foremost, militarized borders to ward off the poor (that are | mostly migrating due to the consequences of decades of our very | own politics). | shadowgovt wrote: | Never accuse American immigration policy of either intelligence | or foresight. | KennyBlanken wrote: | Oh, it's plenty intelligent enough. | | Farming, construction, landscaping, etc all _need_ | undocumented labor over 'legal' labor, all around the | country, but especially in farm country. Do you really | believe that they honestly do not want migrant labor coming | over the borders? | | No payroll taxes/benefits, and undocumented workers are much | easier to exploit. They are highly unlikely to go to the cops | about anything criminal that happens on the job, or to OSHA | about any workplace safety violations, or to the district | attorney about wage theft, and so on. They fear getting | deported or tossed in jail. They're also socially isolated by | various barriers - language, racial prejudice, and so on...so | word of shady stuff going on is a lot less likely to make its | way out. Don't want anyone to find out about your toxic waste | dumping? Have your migrant workers do it. | | Also, migrant workers will do a lot of shit jobs that a lot | of Americans just don't want to do, or at least not at fair | market value labor rates that the business would be | "sustainable" at. | | Meanwhile, politicians shout about how that migrant worker is | stealing your job and so on. So they get the $$$ from the | people who want exploitable labor, and the votes from the | Pickup Truck Petes who think those "illegals" are "stealin' | our jobs" and so on. | | It's not far off from why education is so poorly funded and | constantly under various attacks in the US. There's a lot of | wealthy people who want easily manipulated, uneducated, | trapped-in-poverty workers to exploit. This is also why | abortion is under constant attack; access to family planning | is a huge factor to people escaping poverty. | ed wrote: | > Farming, construction, landscaping, etc all need | undocumented labor over 'legal' labor, all around the | country, but especially in farm country. Do you really | believe that they honestly do not want migrant labor coming | over the borders? | | The US issued 200k+ seasonal visas last year for exactly | this, it's very legal. | | https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united- | states/temporary... | jacobriis wrote: | Farming doesn't actually depend on illegal migrants. The | H2A visa program provided for 213,394 temporary workers for | agriculture in 2020 (93% from Mexico). | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | > There's a lot of wealthy people who want easily | manipulated, uneducated, trapped-in-poverty workers to | exploit. | | I think it's a lot less wealthy people are evil and a lot | more they just don't want to pay for these things. | | Very few people benefit from a poorly educated society. | | But the top 1% pay for 38.8% of Federal taxes. It's more | about not wanting to pay $100k+ in taxes and less about | being evil and wanting your countrymen to be dumb and poor | so you can exploit them. | | Sure, some wealthy people are literally villains. Most of | them aren't. Even the ones who vote for said policies. It's | more greed than evil. | sharkster711 wrote: | I moved myself and my job to Canada (L6 engineer at FAANG). It's | been alright, I wish I could stay but didn't really see a way | forward in the USA, immigration-wise. | | I think folks in the US fail to see that they'll be competing | with engineers of other nationalities - regardless of if they're | in the USA or outside, and there's really nothing that Congress | or anyone else can do to prevent remote jobs (and the trickle- | down monies) from leaving the country. | saghm wrote: | IIRC US citizens are still required to pay income tax to the US | even when working and living abroad, which definitely stops | some money from flowing outwards. There's probably a way to | complete renounce one's US citizenship, but given how it likely | would be hard to reenter the country to visit family or friends | once you do that, I think the tradeoff ends up being a lot more | than people are willing to give up compared to simply moving | abroad. | Retric wrote: | Renouncing US citizenship happens but the the exit tax make | it makes it less appealing for the wealthy. "The exit tax is | calculated as a capital gains tax if all assets were sold on | the day of renunciation." | CameronNemo wrote: | I wish states could do this. Instead people can make a | bunch of gains while living in Oregon (for example), then | move to Idaho and not owe anything to Oregon. Even if the | capital gains were accrued while they lived in Oregon and | benefited from that residency. | jason0597 wrote: | If you make less than $112k abroad, you don't have to pay US | income tax (as long as you declare it to the IRS) | | https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international- | taxpayers/fore... | TheSpiceIsLife wrote: | If I recall correctly, US citizens abroad don't have to pay | US income tax on income earned abroad that has already been | taxed by the local tax authority, under the Foreign Earned | Income Exclusion. | [deleted] | flavius29663 wrote: | Immigration in the US is such a joke. I understand and agree that | the US cannot let everyone in (you would end up with 100 mil | people per year), but the current system is too screwed up. | | If you want to do everything legally, you have to wait/work | years, and even if you have all the papers in order, too many | times it's a matter of luck or a government employee disposition | on that day. | | Be an illegal, and you can just walk through the border. | | The USA could attract much more talent and better immigrants in | general, if they just made it all based on qualifications and | points, like for example Australia. | Layke1123 wrote: | Why? That used to be the US's exact policy. It's even carved | into the Statue of Liberty. | rayiner wrote: | What makes them "better immigrants?" Until the mid 20th century | America took the poorest and least educated immigrants and it | worked out pretty well. It's not clear to me that importing | other countries' elites is a better tack. | sgjohnson wrote: | As a European, who'd love to move to the US, I perfectly agree. | (Except about the points system, because it's completely | arbitrary, imho the only qualification should be either an | advanced degree, or a lined up job offer, subject to annual per | country cap, because otherwise it could get completely out of | hand) | | Going through the L1B or H1B route is below me (as you're tied | to an employer with all the issues that entails, not to mention | the H1B lottery, or the fact that to even qualify for a L1B I'd | have to already work for the same employer for a year, and then | hope they are willing to transfer me is absolutely ridiculous). | | And basically nobody is going to sponsor me for a EB-2 | outright. | | So we're just applying for the DV lottery every year. If we | win, we'll move to the States. Otherwise we're not going | through the meat grinder that is the US immigration system. | | I'm actually not sure what the latest rules are, but what I | recall that H1B spouses can't even get a work permit until | there's an approved I-140 (Green card petition), so H1B route | is a complete showstopper. How desperate do you have to be to | go through that? | qaq wrote: | Well EU is not exactly the worst place in the world... | sgjohnson wrote: | My point exactly. The US is completely incapable of | competing for non-top-level talent from the EU. | | Very few Europeans in their right mind would consider going | through the meat grinder that the US immigration system is, | not least of which is the bad rep the US gets for not | having a single payer healthcare system (not that it should | have one, it's just that Europeans also have to justify | giving that up) | | Personally, I love the United States. But the US basically | can't compete for me as an employee, because I'm going to | take the offer that makes the most rational sense, which, | with as things stand, is extremely unlikely to come from an | employer in the US. | Swizec wrote: | You can sponsor your own EB-2. I did. | | Takes some effort, lots of time, and a smol pile of money for | lawyers. | | I wrote a pretty long article about how I managed to pull | this off, if you're interested. https://swizec.com/blog/how- | i-used-indie-hacking-to-sponsor-... | markdown wrote: | > Be an illegal, and you can just walk through the border. | | This comparison makes no sense. The "legal" waiting years to | get citizenship is still far, far ahead of an illegal who just | walking across the border, yet you've presented this as if the | illegal is somehow being treated better than the legal. | jimbob45 wrote: | Kinda fucked go to only steal away the best and brightest from | poorer nations though, no? It's bad enough that every genius | South America produces immigrates to America at the first | opportunity. Seems less fucked if we take a broader swath of | immigrants than just the geniuses. | [deleted] | screye wrote: | I am going to address the elephant in the room. | | "[1.] Can a country train mediocre domestic performers to the | productivity of the top 1% of other nations, while staying | competitive?" | | or | | "[1a.] Can America's 25th percentile out-compete the 1 percentile | of other countries"? | | or | | "Nurture, but to what extent?" | | It is pointless to have numerous discussions go around in | circles, while no one is willing to address the awkward musical | chair that stays empty. If [1.] is true, then there is a strong | case towards reducing immigration. If not, then immigration is | the only way a country can maintain a developmental advantage. | | _______ | | I understand that this kind of question can quickly head towards | Eugenics if the discussion isn't careful or in immense good | faith. However, it must be glaringly obvious to every smart | person that careful inquiry around question [1.] is central to | actually figuring out a solution that moves past propaganda that | ideological goals. | | While I am digging myself into a hole, I am going to state a few | more such questions: | | [2.] If the pareto principle is true, then is there a hard | _capability_ threshold past which immigrants should be avoided ? | | [3.] If economic immigrants are a net drain, then what level of | additional tax on immigrants makes them a positive addition to | the system? | | [4.] Can someone please explain these graphs to me ? | [g1][g2][g3][g4] . Isn't this a contradiction ? | | [5.] What percent of a representative human population can 'learn | to code' at a professional level? _______ | | To be very clear, I do not equate capability or intelligence to | IQ or any one-dimensional SAT-like test. I will leave it upto the | reader to interpret 'general intelligence / capability / economic | productivity/ human value' as they see fit. | | Also, this is a purely economic perspective towards immigration. | I am keeping morals/need/ideology for another time. | | _______ | | [g1] https://www.pewresearch.org/wp- | content/uploads/2020/08/ft_20... | | [g2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/199958/number-of- | green-c... | | [g3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/200061/number-of- | refugee... | | [g4] | https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/source_c... | yboris wrote: | One of the most important ideas out there: _Open Borders_ | | I think it's the only sensible policy if you are egalitarian and | cosmopolitan. | | https://openborders.info/ | jleyank wrote: | Today,I would think the us isn't either one of these... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-15 23:00 UTC)