[HN Gopher] RIP Good Times (2008) ___________________________________________________________________ RIP Good Times (2008) Author : simonpure Score : 107 points Date : 2022-05-19 17:56 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (articles.sequoiacap.com) (TXT) w3m dump (articles.sequoiacap.com) | davesque wrote: | I always get a kind of morbid kick out of watching everyone do | the same hand wringing over and over again every few years. | [deleted] | mtoner23 wrote: | Chill out, talk to a friend not in tech, their business is | probably doing great right now. Unemployment is unprecedently | low. Things are actually pretty good right now | gnulinux wrote: | Except the stock market, which is in >1 year lowest. | sophacles wrote: | Its still higher than anything pre-covid though. If you look | at the charts for S&P, dow, russel, nasdaq since 2008, | there's a clear "bubble" around covid times, and the current | values look approximately where I would expect them if there | wasn't the covid bump. | thepasswordis wrote: | Unemployment is low because companies have had access to really | cheap money, and have been hiring people in an attempt to grow | their business. | | This is the point of low interest rates, but it has caused | inflation, _and_ it has caused a potential "bomb" now that | rates are hiking. | | Those employees were hired in the hopes of fulfilling tasks | which were _also_ being fueled by cheap money. When the money | dries up (which it has), it 's only a matter of time before | those jobs get cut. | boringg wrote: | Depends on which lens you look at. Is the world about to blow | up? Most likely not. ( _Russia._ unseen asteroid). Are things | going to be more challenging over the next 3-5 years compared | to the last 3-5 years (less pandemic) yes. To your point, | hopefully _if_ we are out of the acute phase of the pandemic | then in comparison things might be better than that last two | years though we aren 't going back to the 2010s era. | | If you work at a large corporation - probably stay on cruise | control. As a founder / investor I would certainly be | stretching out time lines and lowering expectations on | favorable exits and if you are at a company without revenue I | would be concerned. Macro environments have deteriorated | rapidly - outside the fed stepping in (which would be even more | concerning) unlikely to have great exits for awhile. Investors | have also lost a lot of money recently so aren't likely to step | in. Flight to quality ensues.. | | But yes agree, everyone does need to chill out in these | uncertain times. The sun will rise tomorrow just like it did | today. | baskethead wrote: | The funny thing is that the presentation was completely wrong. | The "good times" were only about to begin. Within a couple of | years, tech went on probably its greatest stock market streak in | history. If you look at tech from 2010 until 2021, the gains are | so outsized that it caused things like massive income inequality | in the Bay Area because the gap between tech workers and non-tech | workers was humongous. | | AAPL went from $8 in 2010 to $180, not including the 28:1 split | during that period. Google went from $300 to $3000, not including | a 2:1 split. Amazon went from $100 to $3500, with no splits. | Startups like Uber and Airbnb were about to be founded. Twitter | was created only a couple of years previous. A tremendous amount | of multi-millionaires and billionaires were minted during that | time. | [deleted] | scarface74 wrote: | Whether the Big Tech companies stock saw growth doesn't matter | to VCs. | | And VCs have never consistently beat the S&P 500. They aren't | the ones you want to take financial advice from. | uberdru wrote: | This is absolutely right, and likely to be the pattern for this | downturn as well. Just some form of evolution in the digital | and analog economies. | gilmore606 wrote: | I thought this would be a retrospective on the infamous Good | Times email virus. Good times. | adamsmith143 wrote: | Lots of young kids surprised by the business cycle. Recessions | and downturns happen like clockwork nearly every 10 years for the | past 50 years. Get used to it. It's not different this time. Save | cash, dollar cost average your investments and keep living. Life | goes on. | fny wrote: | A business cycle with double digit inflation and repeat supply | shocks is not normal. | | A business cycle at 100%+ debt to GDP is not normal. | | This is a generational deleveraging that'll be painful for | everyone. | ssnistfajen wrote: | None of what you described is new or "not norm". Japan has | been this way for nearly 3 decades and they are hanging | around just fine. Sure it's not a growing behemoth but they | are far from doomed. | jdsully wrote: | Double digit inflation happened before. The debt to GDP is | new though, it's never been this high. | bayareabadboy wrote: | Does this crash feel uniquely frustrating? Or is that the nature | of these things. I was in high school in 2008 so I'm not sure if | I'm ignorant here or not. | boringg wrote: | Equity crash has been expected for awhile - the unsettling | nature is how long will it go combined with the resurgence of | inflation that we haven't since the 70s. Fed didn't manage that | well and the 70s were tricky. The fed is a different animal now | and so is the macro environment. | | Agree with a lot of sentiment - glad to see some of the hot air | escape - there's some terrible companies and shady businesses | out there right now. Hope we don't go into some global | recession though - thats my concern (if all central banks work | in lockstep). | streetcat1 wrote: | There is no crash. Unemployment rate is 3.6% | | Most of the former crashes hit the financial sector first and | than hit the real economy. This one hit the financial sector | and will stay there. This is why you see wallstreet / vc panic, | but the real economy cannot find employees. | hahaxdxd123 wrote: | This feels extremely cathartic for me. Like we've all returned | to our senses and are no longer pretending it's possible to | have 100% YoY growth indefinitely for every vaguely tech | related company. | mdm12 wrote: | Fundamentals matter again. It would be more cathartic if my | portfolio wasn't down as much as it was! | gumby wrote: | I've lived through worse, 2008 among them. | | I obviously don't know where the bottom is but I do see | multiple simultaneous contributing problems (war -> food | problems; supply and transport problems exacerbated by Covid; | artificially ("profiteering") high prices; a tardy (but firm) | response from the fed -- though it is the nature of such | responses is that they have to be tardy). | | Ironically the multiple causes is a positive sign: they can | start to turn upwards independently. While the 2008 crash was a | secular failure of a singular asset class, or perhaps more | correctly two coupled asset classes (mortgages and CDOs). That | was hard to work it's way out of the system, though unorthodox | actual by the fed and other central banks helped cushion the | shock...at a cost. | | So for example the crypto collapse is high profile but minor, | even trivial, in the scheme of things. | bcrosby95 wrote: | Ah, yes, but the cracks first started appearing in 2006. That | was when the easy loan and refinance spigot was turned off. | | 2022 could be this downturn's 2006. In other words, maybe, | you ain't seen nothin' yet. | tenpies wrote: | The most fascinating part to me is how not like 2008 at all | this one will be. | | I'm talking to every Boomer and gray beard I can - and even | they can only go far so back. We have elements of every great | financial, social, and demographic downfall in our midst | right now, and a political class that seems _desperate_ to | start WW3. I cannot help but remember how a Japanese Boomer | once described the situation leading to WW2 in Japan: "it | was like everybody lost their mind for a very long time". | | The very scary part is how utterly incapable current Western | leaders are. Sure, occasionally a good law or policy sneaks | through, but by and large the best way to emulate their | actions is by asking "what would a saboteur do?". It has been | flawless and continues to be as seen by this morning's US | bill about making price increases in fuel illegal. | | Then there's how utterly over-financialized our system has | become and it's _everywhere_ , from housing to sovereign | debt. If anything, it's scarier because while the consumer | balance sheet is not-that-awful, the sovereign ones that | matter are catastrophic. That confluence of incompetent | decision makers + desperation + big stages usually ends in | catastrophe. | | _If_ we 're exceedingly lucky this would be a 2008, but I | suspect we're still years away from any sort of "bottom" in | either finance, demographics, or societal well-being. | throwaway3221 wrote: | baal80spam wrote: | In 2008 I was 28 and I barely registered something is | happening. Mind you, that was in Europe. | BryanBeshore wrote: | In 2008, I was 25 and in NYC. Seeing professionals with boxes | full of work stuff, on their last days of work, was the norm. | It felt like what I imagined the crash of 1929 and the | dustbowl would be like. | ardit33 wrote: | 2008-2009 was bad world wide, except for Tech. Tech had a | hiring freeze for late 2008-2009 and then things rebounded | fast. Most large companies had minor layoffs (Except Apple and | Facebook). Even Microsoft had layoffs, and Google (stealth shut | down of products). Some smaller startups couldn't raise money | and had to shut down. But things picked up full steam by 2009 | again. | | What saved tech? It was mobile. 2008 was the first year when | you could write apps for the iPhone, and they were a hit. Same | with Android later in 2008 early 2009. It started a boom of new | companies, and then competition for talent. Also Google and | Facebook got into a bidding war for engineers, which started | driving up salaries. | | Also, a lot of the large tech companies today, were started or | took off around that area (AirBnb, DropBox, Uber, Lyft, etc). | | Is this going to be another small bump 2008 for tech (a | correction, hiring freeze, and then upwards), or a long drawn | 2001 style bust? | | My bet it is going to be a 2008-2009 style of correction for | tech (job market at least), with the 2001 style of correction | for stocks. Why? | | 1. Stock were way overhauled, and coming back to pre-pandemic | levels (almost half off for many companies). | | 2. Most large companies are still very profitable right now and | have healthy margins. | | 3. Some will try to rein in costs, and have minor layoffs or | hiring freezes, but no near 2001 style of busts | | 4. Tech is in a long term upswing trend that will last at least | another 50 years. | puranjay wrote: | Do you feel that we've reached the peak of the smartphone | enabled businesses that emerged after 2008? Like apps like | Uber that relied on smartphones to unlock entirely new | markets and possibilities? | | All we have today are optimizations on these earlier models. | Nothing new that truly leverages any unique feature of the | smartphone. | avrionov wrote: | I hope you are right. | | We still don't know the full extend of the current problems. | The housing market, the crypto, the bad loans, the unicorns | without profits. | nwiswell wrote: | After 2009, long term risk free rates continued their secular | decline which culminated in March 2020 at an all time low of | 0.54% for the 10 year Treasury yield. | | This was a major factor in the tech story. Rather than | valuation being focused on _current_ profits, as is the case | for most industrial stocks, valuation for tech is based on | expectations of _future profits_ , i.e. growth. When long | term interest rates are very low, these future cash flows are | not discounted very much. Therefore, good growth numbers for | tech in a low interest rate environment resulted in face- | melting performance as all of that expected future profit is | basically just assigned to the current value of the equity. | | That era is clearly ending. Long term interest rates hit the | all time low and are rebounding in a way that is very | distinct from 2009. I would not be surprised if tech stocks | fundamentally reprice and never completely recover. | | Zoom out here: | | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10 | Bubble_Pop_22 wrote: | interest rates follow inflation, it's too early to tell if | inflation will go back being 4-7% like it was in the 1980s. | | The Fed for sure wants it at 2%, not 2.5% , not 1.7%... | nwiswell wrote: | What do you mean "too early"? Core inflation has been | above 6% since January. The headline number is even | higher. | | The Fed will be raising rates. The question is how far | they have to go before inflation subsides, but it is | monumentally obvious that long-term interest rates have | to lift off. The days of zero-interest overnight rates | are over. | | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=rocU | svachalek wrote: | I'm 50 and I've learned about every 5-15 years banks pull | something that melts down the world economy. It's called | "financial innovation". As others have mentioned, this episode | is pretty painless and innocent so far, to the point that I | personally am not sure we're actually in an episode yet. These | little hiccups happen a lot more often than that, and we often | forget about them a few months later. Actual meltdowns don't | just make you feel worried and annoyed, they hurt a lot. Unless | you're a bank. | fartcannon wrote: | If you're a bank, you make money before, during and after the | meltdowns that you create. And if it looks like youre ever in | trouble, you get bailed out by the same people whose money | you gambled away. It's dark. | streetcat1 wrote: | Actually, if you read Nissim Taleb, banks are the most | fragile companies. They have capped upside (basically | interest rate) , and indefinite downside. | lordnacho wrote: | I'm only in my early 40s but as a young trader I sat next to | people who traded the 1987 crash, Asia, Russia (90s), and the | dotcom crash plus 9/11. | | Hindsight changes a lot of things. For one the market recovered | from all previous crashes, with one major exception. | | I traded through 2008. It felt apocalyptic. I got a text | message from a guy at Lehman on the Monday, surprised he was | now out of a job. There was a queue of people at Northern Rock. | | We knew that a lot of bad things were about to come out, | basically things that had been papered over to fix dotcom. The | whole subprime thing was predictable, I went to a lunch at | Goldman's where they basically just said it out loud, the | subprime market is gonna explode and maybe take some other | things with it. | | But what we have now feels like it's sweeping even that under | the rug. Growth didn't bounce back hugely afterwards, it's been | mild. But interest rates have hit a low nobody that imagined. | The whole period since 2008 has been exceptional. A lot of | things that seemed like frothy excess went on for a long time. | A lot of stuff that should have died in 2008 got to live. | | So yeah it feels really big, but no climax thus far. No Lehman | yet, and no Madoff. A couple of things sort of felt like maybe | they would cascade, but didn't, eg Bill Huang's fund going | down. For the GFC we had the two Bear Stearns funds going down | as a preshock. Not sure if Luna really qualifies, given the | amount of crazy things that happen in crypto. | timr wrote: | Lived through the first dot-com crash, the 2008 crash, and now | this. | | The current reality, today, is nowhere near either one -- | speculative bubble tech has crashed, but the rest of the market | is around February 2021 prices. The S&P500 is only just now | entering "correction" territory. | | The only thing similar is that we have a ton of drama from | people claiming that the end is near. But in 2008, the | financial system _really was_ close to systemic collapse. Banks | were having runs and being rescued by the FDIC. _Money market | accounts were dropping below a dollar._ That was _crazy_. | Seeing Terra break the buck is...not the same. | | Yes, inflation is high and that's concerning, but what's | fundamentally driving a lot of the panic are the "high" | interest rates (i.e. rates that haven't been "this high" | since...spring of 2020). This too shall pass. Parts of the | market that were wildly irrational will gain sanity, or they | will go away. Fake wealth will be lost. It will be painful for | the few who dove head-first into the froth, but to me, right | now, this doesn't look like a moment for panic. For contrast, I | was genuinely freaked out by what was happening in 2008. | cammikebrown wrote: | It's only just getting started though. We have no idea how | bad it will get yet. | puranjay wrote: | How do you think it will impact startups that essentially | grew by incentivizing users and never achieved unit | profitability? A funding crunch can't be good for their | survival | timr wrote: | I think the other thread from YC on what it means for | startups is on point. | | "Survival of startups", plural, is not the metric of | relevance. The strong will survive. The ones who were/are | running on fumes are gonna have a bad time. | ghaff wrote: | In an era of belt-tightening, it's reasonable to expect | that companies that can't even achieve a profit, including | companies like Uber, will have to make changes and the | people who have created lifestyles based on VC subsidies | will have to face reality as well. | jghn wrote: | This is where I worry. My recollection of how the dot com | crash unfolded was that first the bogus startups folded as | expected. But they're part of a larger food chain. There | were other b2b companies who had them as customers. And now | they're out of money so they fold. Which affects other | companies. And so on. | dcolkitt wrote: | To add to this. In 2008, I had a small but genuine fear that | society itself would start collapsing. You'd see headlines | about bankrupt municipalities turning off their 911 service | because they ran out of cash. There were genuine bank runs on | major consumer banks where grandmas kept their checking | accounts. Things felt close to the brink. | | A lot of people forget that, because the recovery turned on | so quickly in 2009. But nobody knew things would be so easy | in the thick of November 2008. | bcantrill wrote: | You sweet summer child! First, this thing hasn't even started. | My fellow vets of the dot com bust will remember that period in | the summer of 2000 where we all called it "the correction": the | sentiment was that some companies that never should have been | funded in the first place would (obviously!) perish, but that | those companies that "made picks and shovels" would endure. (A | Gold Rush-era metaphor that I heard countless times.) At least | in 2000, that optimism turned out to be misguided: when there | are NO MINERS AT ALL there is little need for picks and shovels | -- and the big tech companies all saw their businesses severely | adversely affected by the end of 2000. | | And of course, it took years to find a bottom: the bust went so | deep that EVERY significant tech company in ~2000 went through | layoff after layoff after layoff over the first half of the | next decade, as documented by the HN of the day, | fuckedcompany.com[0]. Yes, the housing bubble started to form | mid-decade, but tech itself hadn't really meaningfully | recovered when 2008 arrived (and this famous Sequoia memo!) -- | and it was only from the embers of THAT bust (broadly deeper | but much less acute in tech) that the next bubble began to | form. | | So in terms of now: it's hard to know where this thing is | going, but there are more parallels (to me) to the Dot Com Bust | than to the 2008 Recession. I expect this thing to run pretty | deep in tech, and I think some sectors (ahem, web3) may well | face extinction. If it does run that deep, you will only know | that it's over in hindsight: it will take years to recover, and | it's only when everyone stops thinking about it that the seeds | of a true recovery will be planted. So, get comfortable: it may | be a while. | | One final note. Back in the depths of the bust (maybe 2003?), I | saw a bumper sticker on the 101 that stuck with me: "Please | God, Just One More Bubble." I remember thinking at that time | that there would be no more bubbles forthcoming -- that nothing | could possibly be as frothy as what I had lived through. I was | wrong, of course, and I really hope the driver of that car | cashed out on their NFT marketplace or whatever! | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fucked_Company | fullshark wrote: | I am frustrated in that I have money but nowhere to put it, | anxious over holding it because of inflation. Just kind of | sitting around waiting, losing wealth. | trey-jones wrote: | Losing wealth to inflation might be preferable to losing it | to equities in the coming months. Obviously nobody knows, but | it seems long overdue. There are also positions that are | very, very lucrative in bear markets, and I'll assume you | know about these, or know how to find out about them. | mistermann wrote: | I am certainly not aware, any chance you could share a few? | AnimalMuppet wrote: | Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Consult a | professional (or several), not some random muppet on HN. | | One way to play it is to buy long-term bonds at about the | peak of the interest rates. Bond prices are inversely | correlated with interest rates; as rates drop, bond | prices rise. The longer term gives you a longer lever for | the interest rate move to raise the price. | | Then, when rates bottom, sell the bonds and buy stocks. | [Edit: Because that's the top for the bonds, and usually | somewhere around the bottom for the stocks.] | | The observant will note that this requires you to know | when the interest rates are peaking, and when they are at | bottom. There are some technical markers that can give | you hints, but the reality is that there is no absolute | way of determining these things. They turn out to be | informed judgment calls. | tylerhou wrote: | Buy inflation protected bonds from the government | (TreasuryDirect) if you haven't already. | ghaff wrote: | While a decent recommendation, it has a fairly small cap | for someone with a lot of money to invest. | [deleted] | trgn wrote: | This is thermodynamically inevitable, at least, according to | this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth,_Virtual_Wealth_and | _Deb... | | Storing wealth for later is one of the hardest things to do. | It is an unsolved problem, even after thousands of years. | Capitalism has a strong claim to hint at a workable solution: | it formulates a process in which savings can be converted | into capital, capital being the lever to increase | productivity, thus increasing wealth. Funnily enough, the | accountants responded by starting to depreciate the capital | assets, bringing it back full circle. It also necessitates | capital being deployed productively. And that too is | apparently not that easy either, as the current meltdown is | showing. | Bubble_Pop_22 wrote: | flyinglizard wrote: | Assets decay. Depreciating them seems more like a decision | of a physicist rather than an account. | puranjay wrote: | Historically, gold has kept your purchasing power largely | intact over long periods. | waterlaw wrote: | I'm the biggest gold bug ever. Been holding this awful | asset for the last 12 years. | | This is the most manipulated, trash asset imaginable. The | price of gold hasn't changed since 2011. It was $1900, | still $1900. | | Worst investment of my life. Maybe 2024 - 2030 will see | some returns in gold like we saw from 2001 - 2011. | | I'll keep investing in miners, because it's what I know and | spend a lot of time reading drill results, balance sheets, | etc. | | But diversifying my portfolio. Oil has done particularly | well in the past two years. There are many other | interesting commodities. | JoeJonathan wrote: | What do you mean by frustrating? In my memory of 2008, there | was a real sense of panic, far beyond anything we're seeing | right now. Before it was evident things had gone really wrong, | plenty of people had a sense that something had to give-- | housing was going crazy, and I remember making $37k and | qualifying for mortgages on NYC apartments--but inflation was | <3% and unemployment was low. | | While I think we're headed for a whole new kind of disaster | (albeit one I can't predict--unlike 2008, there's nothing | fundamentally wrong with financing of housing, but I can't see | how these prices are sustainable), I'm not sure it'll be | 2008-level doom. The frustration, I think, comes from a real | sense of the toll of inflation coupled with annoyance, | sometimes unarticulated, that we could have put the breaks on | by raising interest rates more aggressively long ago, circa | 2015-2016, when the stock market started going crazy. | BryanBeshore wrote: | I agree with this. Basically the fed 'rescued' the system in | 2008 by injecting capital into the system. | | However, this 'rescue' became the norm and they decided to | continue easy money policy for the next 14-years. Now, here | we are! This has been a concern for a long time now. | cyberlurker wrote: | Rates were being raised before the pandemic. Don't you | remember all the complaining by the President? | cyberlurker wrote: | I think the hesitation was there was a minor economic | slowdown around that time and inflation was still flat, so it | is unclear raising rates would have been the right call. | | Its easy to see there is a problem now, but I don't believe | anyone knows what amount was caused by the pandemic. Despite | gripes everywhere, I actually think Fed policy has been very | reasonable given the circumstances. If not for the pandemic, | steady rate hikes were already happening and set to continue. | csa wrote: | > Does this crash feel uniquely frustrating? | | We are currently in a correction (at least officially). | | Whatever pain folks are feeling right now will feel trivial to | what the pain will be like when an actual crash comes. | xivzgrev wrote: | This. | | I remember the 2008 crash and it was panic. Banks collapsing, | large layoffs, hiring freezes, and a quick downturn. | | Hell the pandemic downturn in spring 2020 felt worse than | this. Unemployment went way up, banks were pulling back, | people were being laid off. That was an artificial crash with | a fairly defined end time. A normal crash does not have that. | | Whatever this is, not a crash. Or at least yet. | BryanBeshore wrote: | Tech has crashed, and is very much in a recession, while | the rest of the economy has been operating (decently) | smoothly. This said, other parts of the economy are | starting to feel knock-on effects of inflation, higher | rates, and supply issues. | | Things could certainly get a lot worse. 2008 was brutal, | though. | puranjay wrote: | Yeah this is not even remotely a crash. Even laggards who | bought anything in late 2020 are still in profit. Anyone who | bought anything pre 2020 is wildly in profit. | | In 2008, SPX eventually crashed to 700ish - a level it had | last seen in 1997. A whole decade of investor wealth was | wiped out | | Right now, we haven't even seen the pandemic era wealth wiped | out. This is honestly a paper cut compared to a proper | 2008-like crash | dvirsky wrote: | I don't know if this is just the start of a bigger thing, but | this is nothing like 2008 for sure; in 2000 I was around but | didn't work in tech directly so it affected me less. 2008 was a | complete panic, people thought it was literally the end of the | financial world as we know it, the market collapse was just the | tip of the iceberg. | | In 2008 I was working at a start-up that had plenty of cash, | but pretty crappy investors who panicked and decided they want | their money back, and through the board forced the company to | basically shut down, didn't even pay us our last paycheck or | the severance required by law in my country. So I found myself | unemployed (with a baby BTW), my wife was also laid off, we | pretty quickly had to withdraw money from our not-that-big | savings, my company was car gone and I needed a new car, and no | company around even thinking of hiring. It was extremely scary. | I did some freelance work for a couple of months, then found a | job at a pre-seed start-up that managed to scrape a couple | hundred K somehow, and got by for a bit. After a year things | started to turn around and things went great up until now. But | it was really traumatic. | uberdru wrote: | I saw this the first time around. Times are different. I do | recall one VP wandering the halls loudly opining that "no start- | up will ever go public again." In 2008. | fullshark wrote: | He was basically right! | BryanBeshore wrote: | Hahah. Because "times were different" and the money, well, | that just kept flowing in the private market. | Bubble_Pop_22 wrote: | Recessions are for the economy what workouts are for humans and | what forest fires are for the soil. | | They are essential , matter of fact fundamental for the long term | stability of the economy. | | We should welcome them like we welcome hard workouts, instead we | are wussies unfortunately. | | People are already calling for Jay Powell to rescue markets by | ignoring inflation and cut interest rates once again, just to | make their favorite meme stock rally again... | 1270018080 wrote: | I'm just surprised how quickly things are going badly. My company | is trying to get a round of funding. If you asked me 8 weeks ago | how it was going, I would've said "We're in a very strong | position, hiring like crazy, tons of growth upcoming. We're going | to get a ton of money." Now, it's "Bad. Who knows." | | We're still going to get money, but it's likely 75% less than we | were thinking 8 weeks ago. And we're a real company with a real | product and demand, not web3 or whatever. I can't imagine how | those companies are going to fare. | boringg wrote: | They are going to going to go down like a Lead Zeppelin. | mstipetic wrote: | Good. | goblinux wrote: | a distributed lead zeppelin | ajross wrote: | Things turn around like this because the truth is that everyone | (including and especially VCs) _knew_ that things were | overheated, and had been for well over year. But you still want | to cut deals in a market that 's overheated because if you | don't someone else will, and there's a lot of money still being | made. | | But once it turns over, the game is up. They know it's not | coming back for another cycle for the same reason they knew | that existing funding and valuation numbers were unsustainable. | boringg wrote: | Seems likes a good time to dust off the presentation and | repackage it for todays woes. | codeulike wrote: | The economy is like a software stack thrown together out of | random chaotic components and now and again it blue-screens and | people squint at the hex error message and pretend they know the | bug that caused it but really they don't. And the important thing | is to keep backups | [deleted] | amelius wrote: | And the free market is a system where software runs without an | operating system to keep an eye on fair scheduling and resource | use. | aaronbrethorst wrote: | 'Free market.' | speed_spread wrote: | 'Operating System' | tetrahedr0n wrote: | > Free market: an economic system in which prices are | determined by unrestricted competition between privately | owned businesses. | | Interesting concept, I wonder if it works. | aaronbrethorst wrote: | Sounds better than what we have today. | recursivedoubts wrote: | daily reminder that we've never seen buffett indicators coming | off this level: | | https://www.longtermtrends.net/market-cap-to-gdp-the-buffett... | | this could get really, really bad, in a way most people aren't | prepared to think about ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-19 23:00 UTC)