[HN Gopher] What Happened to Tagging? (2019) ___________________________________________________________________ What Happened to Tagging? (2019) Author : Tomte Score : 64 points Date : 2022-05-21 16:09 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (daily.jstor.org) (TXT) w3m dump (daily.jstor.org) | PaulHoule wrote: | Add enough tags and then you have a gawdawful mess and you need | tags to organize your tags. | WalterGR wrote: | I've always thought that Gmail's hierarchical tagging | ('folders') is a great solution to the organization problem. | pc9 wrote: | Same. I've making and remaking a bookmarking/notetaking site | for my personal use over the years, and this is the solution | I landed on. They look like and can be organized like | folders, but you can quickly add items to multiple folders. I | think it's working well for me so far. | WalterGR wrote: | That's awesome. Just this past week I've started looking | for a Chrome extension that does the same. | coffeeblack wrote: | Doesn't that always happen? Some people will push the tools so | far that they lose all their initial usefulness. | bbkane wrote: | I think this is a great use case for some algorithm to help you | combine tags ( by recognizing synonyms/plurals, text | summarization, crowd-spurcing, something else?). Then it could | keep you "on the rails" when tagging and periodically ask if | you want to combine tags that seem similar. | foerbert wrote: | Perhaps, but after even just a few relatively short attempts | to start organizing some of my files with tags I don't think | this would be sufficient. I found the meaning of tags | frequently started to drift. What I cared about and why just | wasn't that consistent. Never mind being consistent with | hair-splitting judgement calls in categorization. | | And the more you tag, the more difficult it is to fix. Either | you retag everything to fit the new standard or you accept | that trying to retrieve things by tag will return some weird | set defined by the intersection of your changing definition | over time and the time at which you applied the tag. | | I don't doubt a more structured and principled approach would | help, but I found it just ended up soaking up tons of time, | and thought, without actually providing much back. | caseyross wrote: | Besides what the article goes into about auto-curation of social | feeds reducing self-curation, the counterintuitive answer is that | decentralized tagging requires strong centralization to work. | | You need: | | - agreement on what should be and what should not be tagged in a | given domain | | - standardized terminology (no multiple variants of tags) | | - consistent grammar and formatting across all tags | | - software support for tag editing that makes it easy to adhere | to established tagging rules | | - mechanisms to explain tagging rules to new users, at scale | | - mechanisms to punish malicious/spam tagging (e.g. user | history/reputation + bans) | | Usually, all of these conditions together are only found in | highly niche and specialized forums that care a lot about the | quality of their content. While most large social platforms today | do have some kind of tagging system (e.g. hash tags on | Twitter/Instagram), the usefulness of these systems is generally | limited due to the inherent difficulties of co-ordinating so many | diverse users who have varying interests. | porker wrote: | > Usually, all of these conditions together are only found in | highly niche and specialized forums that care a lot about the | quality of their content. | | Ooh do any of these still exist? If you know of any I'd love | the links to look at how they're doing. | | I was an inveterate tagger, debating taxonomies and ontologies | late into the night (I have now forgotten the difference | between the two!) and tried to run a curated forum. Eventually | I gave up for most of the reasons you highlight - but mainly | because I realised no one was as OCD about classification as I | was. | | In another life I would have run and catalogued a university | library. | b3morales wrote: | Stack Overflow exhibits (or exhibited) all the points that | parent mentioned. If you look at [the discussion of tags on | the Meta site][0], and especially what's called | ["burnination"][1] you'll see these issues being hashed out | over time. | | To sustain a tagging system like that it takes dedicated and | invested individuals, and the corollary of that is that such | people tend to generate a _lot_ of discussion. | | [0]:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tags | [1]:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/tags/burninate- | request/info | karaterobot wrote: | Right around the time the author was celebrating Tagsgiving, I | was in Library School, and tagging was a hot topic around those | parts. The consensus there was: "this is great and all, but | there's a reason we have controlled vocabularies and | classification systems. We'll see, we'll see." | | I was all in on the possibilities for "folksonomies" and user | tagging. However I have to admit that I have not seen many | examples of where uncontrolled tagging was all that useful at | scale. | | To organize information, you need experts, with training, time, | and a reason to get it right. Or, you can do it with an | arbitrarily sophisticated, mostly theoretical ML system. But | neither of these solutions benefit from having user tags. | m3kw9 wrote: | Apple notes tag is pretty awful. | jkmcf wrote: | OTOH, Federico Viticci (MacStories) just switched to using | reminders and tags with smart lists. I haven't attempted this | yet, but I think the gist is reminders/notes requires tags in | order to get smart folders. | | https://club.macstories.net/posts/going-all-in-with-reminder... | CharlesW wrote: | How so? https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212507 | woojoo666 wrote: | I don't think tags died, they just evolved to more user friendly | forms. For example, Reddit is basically tags. You post something | to one subreddit, or cross-post it to another, and other users | who are subscribed will all see it. Perhaps the UX was the main | issue in those early days | jimz wrote: | Also, reddit, due to the way it encourages specific niche | subreddits to proliferate, inadvertently also showcases, albeit | from the tag side instead of the tagged-content side, one use- | case where community tagging is both necessary and canonical | tags are inconsistent or nonexistent, which is the vast arena | of porn, which involves attempts to categorize massive amounts | of content that are frequently lacking in tags or tagged | minimalistically or even erroneously by studios, and also, can | involve specific preferences that aren't necessarily even | considered as something that needs to be tagged until someone | starts a subreddit on some really obscure aspect of a clip and | then, suddenly it turns out there's a community and demand for | such a tag. | | Some automated tagging solutions do work on some aspects of the | tag deficiencies - performers using different stage names, for | example. However, just as obscenity is defined on a "I'll know | it when I see it" basis, individual and perhaps previously | unnamed categorizations pop up frequently enough that there's | no realistic way to anticipate every future community tag that | may come about. There's also inconsistencies as to how | currently-used tags are defined, and even in the generally more | centralized and almost over-specific niches of the industry in | Japan, with consistent and unique product codes for reference, | you still don't get a single consistent studio tag system, even | for their domestic mainstream market. And language certainly | factors into all this, as well as culture. It's already evident | that some tags translate and some simply don't, either because | there is no word for it in the other language, or the | categorization loses some aspect of cultural significance in | the translation process that makes it end result valid but also | nonsensical. Some degree of community curation to augment even | a relatively consistent, centralized, and comprehensive | canonical source. | | There are a few projects on Github that are hashing out | compatible systems for at least the English language (and it | appears that projects in Korean and Chinese exist too, also on | Github). This is definitely an arena that is organic, | disorganized, and even if in the future can mostly be | automated, will always have room for community curation, and is | actually actively being worked out and evolving in real time. | Tags, or community curation at large, will likely persist as | content, the market, culture, CV/classification tech, and mores | change as time goes on. Definitely not dying. | seunosewa wrote: | I loved del.icio.us. It was a core part of my browsing | experience. Any useful link I stumbled upon got tagged and saved. | The popular links were very useful, too. Then it got sold to | people who couldn't figure out how to make money off it without | ruining it. | | I still miss the functionality of being able to quickly find | every interesting webpage I've ever seen (using tags). A way to | supply that functionality in the modern world would be a visited | pages search feature on Google or Chrome. Or a search feature for | the content of pages I've bookmarked. | wvenable wrote: | Am I missing something because I use Firefox? I bookmark and | tag every interesting site I come across. Is tagging not a | thing in Chrome? | kordlessagain wrote: | I'm building a personal search engine/document management | system that uses tags similar to how del.icio.us worked. URLs | and screenshots can be saved via the browser, or by instructing | the system to crawl it (which gets done with | Firefox/webdriver). It's a like a split brained version of the | Grub crawler. It also supports uploading PDFs and images. | | Tags, objects, labels, synthesized commentary, etc. are | provided by machine learning models and GPT3. Eventually the | pipelines will be customizable, so running a plant | identification model will be possible. Full text search and | analytics is provided via a customized Solr deployment manager. | I've built a unique UI for it based on my original cut of a | simple timeseries interface at Loggly. Love using it, but have | no idea if others will want to pay for it. I seriously hate | ads, trackers and user privacy violations. | merry-zebra|> !crawl | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31459103 merry- | zebra|> Please wait while I index | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31459103. merry- | zebra|> Site has been indexed. An image of the site will be | added in ~10 seconds. merry-zebra|> ... merry- | zebra|> updated 2022-05-21T18:55:06Z merry-zebra|> ID | UmXyyk3tZJdGZW4uv merry-zebra|> title What Happened to | Tagging? (2019) | Hacker News merry-zebra|> | description The article discusses the potential reasons why | "tagging" (i.e. adding labels to content for organizational | purposes) has declined in popularity in recent years, despite | its usefulness. merry-zebra|> URL | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31459103 merry- | zebra|> Tags #What, #Happened, #Tagging, #2019, #HackerNews, | #News merry-zebra|> ... merry-zebra|> To search me | for the document, click on one of the action links. | system=> Do you have any comments about this webpage, @merry- | zebra? merry-zebra|> I find tagging to be extremely | useful for organizing content. I think the decline in | popularity is likely due to the fact that it can be time | consuming to tag everything, and people are often lazy. | However, I think it is worth the effort to tag things, as it | makes it much easier to find what you're looking for later on. | dchuk wrote: | Is this a project you intend only for yourself? Or is it | going to be a product? | spookthesunset wrote: | Completely agree. Delicious was like the perfect bookmark | manager. Then it went to complete shit and ever since then I've | barely bookmarked anything. | | Honestly though I don't think bookmarks serve much of a purpose | anymore. Like I'll just search my history if I need something | specific. Or maybe I've just forgotten how useful they are. | wincy wrote: | Why couldn't such a thing be a local browser extension or | similar? | flir wrote: | > A way to supply that functionality in the modern world would | be a visited pages search feature on Google or Chrome | | I've been wondering about a plugin that does that. Maybe built | over this? https://lunrjs.com/ | | I am ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN this does not yet exist. | | (Easier to type that last sentence than actually Google for | it). | tlavoie wrote: | Pinboard (https://pinboard.in/) is still a thing, and the | developer bought the deli.icio.us domain too I think. | | In any case, it has at least replicated the del.icio.us | functionality, and then added more, such as archiving page | contents. The tags are still there too, and it prompts with | other users' tags when you add a bookmark. Oh, and an API, | which is very useful for programmatic use of the data once | saved. | panic wrote: | Pinboard doesn't have the social features that del.icio.us | had--you can't see the list of others who bookmarked a link, | for example. | achairapart wrote: | For sometime there were also "machine tags", basically a triple | tag invented (I think) at Flickr[0]. It was an interesting | concept, you could automate relationships between different | contexts, for example between Flickr and Last.fm[1]. | | I used it for a while, then I always wondered why nothing similar | has ever emerged, maybe because after the first wave of "social | sharing" excitement of web 2.0, every walled garden has basically | double locked their gates. And this is maybe what happened to | tagging in general. | | [0]: http://tagaholic.me/2009/03/26/what-are-machine-tags.html | | [1]: https://code.flickr.net/2008/08/28/machine-tags-lastfm- | and-r... | pyinstallwoes wrote: | I'm not sure I'm following, how is the machine tag format | setting up automatic relationships and contexts? How is it | helpful and how might you see it being effective today? | | Edit: only saw the first link. Seems second link breaks it down | but can't review it yet. Got pulled away. Thanks! | bastawhiz wrote: | The concept of machine tags is the core premise of RDF. RDF is | essentially the standardized way of describing relationships in | a structured way (in XML). In fact, an early version of RSS was | based on RDF (RSS 0.9 stood for "RDF site summary). | | One of the downsides is that it's pretty hard for "average" | folks to produce these feeds. There's a steep learning curve | for modeling the relationships. Getting other sites to agree on | a format, use it, and maintain it without breaking | compatibility was hard. | asplake wrote: | Killed (at least for me) by browser history (and then the web of | course) being so easily searchable | 7fYZ7mJh3RNKNaG wrote: | Although that might have been the case some time ago, nowadays | browser history is definitely not easily searchable unless you | only need results from the last 90 days. Chrome purges them | after that, and Firefox has a similar limit. | johnny22 wrote: | I just have my history config set to: | | Firefox will "remember history" | | and my history goes back to 2019 when i started this new | firefox profile. | cratermoon wrote: | Curated tags, including canonizing one variation of a tag and | making all the others with the same meaning synonyms: | https://archiveofourown.org/wrangling_guidelines/16 | | Of course, where a single word has two or more meanings, synonyms | don't make sense, so go with Wikipedia-style disambiguation. | | Also be aware if your community has specialized jargon, uses | multiple human languages, patois, creole, dialects, or pidgin. | | Allow multi-word tags, but settle on a single casing/separation | and enforce it: camelCase, snake_case, and kebab-case are some | choices. | | Prefer plurals "landscapes" over singulars "landscape". | | See also | https://web.archive.org/web/20050426210018/http://ideant.typ... | tiffanyh wrote: | Tagging never died. | | "Tags" became known as "Labels". | | Labels are core functionality of Gmail, GitHub Issues, and more | today. | stareatgoats wrote: | Tagging requires mental energy and some level of abstraction | prowess - and might still be misleading. Social media is geared | towards making the user expend as little mental energy as | possible - and then organize the information they provide anyway | for the advertisers using behavioral patterns or some variant of | AI. This is probably considered by the industry to provide more | reliable information - its like the difference between asking | people to explain ethical behavior compared to recording what | people actually do in reality. | | So, we have a "tagging" model driven by advertising needs, that | discourages our own need to tag (intellectually categorize) the | content we consume. Instead of moving forwards, towards a more | accurate tagging system that supports reflection and concept | organization, it seems to me (in my pessimistic moments) that we | are moving backwards into an online world where the only ones | that know what we are doing are the machines. | japhyr wrote: | Building an effective tagging system can be much harder than | people realize. I once worked on a tagging system for a | collection of math problems. I thought I could code a simple | tagging model, and let users tag their own math problems, and it | would become much easier to find the problems you're most | interested in. | | Then I realized that tags like _algebra 1_ , _Algebra 1_ , | _Algebra I_ , _Alg I_ , and all other variations should mean the | same thing. So I started to develop a closed set of tags. That | led to a fascinating rabbit hole about taxonomies that I don't | even remember how to speak about clearly at this point. | | That project is still a work in progress, and it's left me with | immense respect for people who build well-structured systems that | involve tagging. | NicoJuicy wrote: | I just used synonyms and a tag hierarchy ( nested sets). | | Works pretty well. | japhyr wrote: | I ended up building out a hierarchy as well. But figuring out | the structure of that hierarchy was not trivial at all. How | does the name of a repeatable class (Algebra 1) fit with the | name of a specific class (Algebra 1 Fall 2020 Section 2)? How | does that relate to an area of math like algebra, geometry, | number theory? How does that relate to things like context | (ie problems about Minecraft, Lego, Physics, etc.) | | I developed a closed system of tags, and then gave people the | ability to define aliases. | cratermoon wrote: | closed system and aliases are good. Taxonomies, not so | much. See https://oc.ac.ge/file.php/16/_1_Shirky_2005_Ontol | ogy_is_Over... and | http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html | mgdlbp wrote: | Two impressive site-wide systems I've seen are the categories | of Wikimedia Commons (multimedia) and tags of Archive of Our | Own (fanfiction). The Commons guideline[0] elucidates its | system and interesting ontological theory well. It's scope is | extremely broad, aiming to simultaneously include any possibly | useful categorization scheme,[1] and overall is a fairly | freeform (ideally) directed acyclic graph. Variations are | handled with redirects and disambiguation pages in a typical | wiki manner, with the limitation that individual category uses | must have the canonical name. Ao3, in contrast, has a schema of | sorts, and synonyms are made equivalent during resolution (its | tags FAQ[2] is also an interesting read). | | I tried to write a more thorough comment but also struggled | with being coherent. Thus, some ideas, only briefly: | | - At an even higher level, the web itself and the overlapping | userbases/communities ('intersectionality', without the | discrimination--the original set-theory kind?) of individual | sites can also be considered a way of organizing content | | - Thus, analogously: Search engines replaced directories and | webrings as algorithms did tags. The present SEO meta, | though... | | - Generalizing from Commons, all Wikimedia wikis (Wikipedia, | etc.) have parallel category structures, only less developed | due to the greater reliance on links. So do most wikis in | general, though Wikimedia also unifies categorization and | structured data with Wikidata. From there are knowledge graphs | and databases in general, wrapping back around to Google trying | to determine the Knowledge Graph item that each query refers | to. | | [0] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories | | [1] all the typical keying on depicted people, things, times, | and places, plus the ways that we categorize those. Niches from | 'horizontal bicolor blue and white flags' to 'Luxembourgish | pronunciation by gender', 'trams on route 709', 'ships with 6 | funnels'. There's a tool (now called vCat) to visualize | categories, some outputs here: | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikimedia_catgra... | | [2] https://archiveofourown.org/faq/tags | | Edit: specific examples | mro_name wrote: | > I tried to write a more thorough comment but also struggled | with being coherent. | | how fitting. | | I guess it's always about neighbourhoods. In your street, in | your pew, in your bookshelf, inside your brain, in your | zettelkasten. | duskwuff wrote: | > tags of Archive of Our Own (fanfiction) | | On a similar note, Danbooru-style image boards often have | highly developed tagging systems, ranging from tags for | specific characters or artists to tags for art styles, poses, | or even specific features which happen to appear in the | artwork (like "hat bow" or "blue eyes"). | mgdlbp wrote: | Just for fun, here are your examples applied to Commons | (and a conjecture that tag systems naturally converge as | they become more fine-grained): | | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cat:Wikipe-tan | | (NSFW-ish[0]) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cat:Drawin | gs_by_User:Seed... | | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cat:Demoscene | | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cat:Paintings_of_couples | ,... | | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cat:Blue_eyes | | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cat:Bow_hats | | There's also a tool to intersect or subtract categories | hidden in the dropdown of the 'Good pictures' button at the | top right. | | [0] (NSFW-ish) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seedfeeder | dahdum wrote: | I'm not sure tags died, TikTok certainly seems to be built around | tags and it has over a billion monthly users. They are also key | to Instagram discovery but feel a little less important there, | though I don't care much for that platform and could be wrong. | andybak wrote: | Obligatory: https://people.well.com/user/doctorow/metacrap.htm | [deleted] | tandav wrote: | All you need is links. Tags are just links to pages which don't | exists. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30915520 ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-21 23:01 UTC)