[HN Gopher] Leslie Lamport revolutionized computer science with ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Leslie Lamport revolutionized computer science with math [video]
        
       Author : chat
       Score  : 100 points
       Date   : 2022-05-24 19:55 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | nanna wrote:
       | Leslie Lamport built Knuth's TeX into the user-friendly version
       | to which he appended the first two letters of his surname: LaTeX.
       | He wrote an excellent, highly accessible guide, LaTeX: A Document
       | Preparation System, which I wish I read before setting off on a
       | thousand random web pages.
        
       | math-dev wrote:
       | Something related: https://www.quantamagazine.org/computing-
       | expert-says-program...
        
       | _448 wrote:
       | At the end of explaining the "bakery algorithm", he says "I am
       | proud that I _stumbled on it_ " He doesn't say "I invented it",
       | "I came with it", "I wrote it", etc, etc.
       | 
       | In my career I have seen that people who are true geniuses are
       | also very humble!
        
         | lifefeed wrote:
         | There's a list of his papers with little notes by him on every
         | one at https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/pubs.html . His
         | casual notes are themselves an absolute education.
         | 
         | My favorite is on "Time, Clocks and the Ordering of Events in a
         | Distributed System", where he applies the lessons of special
         | relativity to understand computers, and he says:
         | 
         | > Jim Gray once told me that he had heard two different
         | opinions of this paper: that it's trivial and that it's
         | brilliant. I can't argue with the former, and I am disinclined
         | to argue with the latter.
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | I think one of the things that helped was his ability to come up
       | with very catchy explanations and names. "Paxos" and "Byzantine
       | Generals" have great memetic power verses some boring technical
       | name.
        
       | jamesblonde wrote:
       | Great video. I met Leslie once, sat on the bus beside him on the
       | way to a conference around 8 years ago. He wasn't the chattiest,
       | but you bring up his work, he likes to talk. I think he was just
       | over 70 years old, but still incredibly sharp. At the time
       | Microsoft Research were shutting down their valley office, but
       | they would still let him come in there - last one to put the
       | lights out (metaphorically for computer science research at the
       | big IT companies). Nowadays, he couldn't do the research work he
       | did there and at other places at any big IT company - it's R&D,
       | with the emphasis on "D".
        
         | peppertree wrote:
         | I believe VMWare "adopted" Microsoft's research team, but
         | that's the last I heard of the team. These days the most
         | interesting corporate research happens at Google, Nvidia,
         | OpenAI. I guess the forefront of research has moved onto ML and
         | many old school researchers got left behind.
        
           | metadat wrote:
           | There's lots of other research happening all over, but gets
           | little attention probably due to non-existent or otherwise
           | poor marketing beyond publishing papers.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | InefficientRed wrote:
           | There is tons of formal methods research happening in
           | industry. Way more than in the days of Microsoft research
           | silicon valley
        
           | rhplus wrote:
           | TLA+ and other formal language research is pursued by the
           | RISE group in Microsoft Research:
           | 
           | https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/group/research-
           | soft...
        
         | avgcorrection wrote:
         | > I think he was just over 70 years old, but still incredibly
         | sharp.
         | 
         | Nice...
         | 
         | I don't think someone at his level becomes dull at such a young
         | senior age.
        
       | triska wrote:
       | One of the most interesting results I found in Leslie Lamport's
       | papers is _Buridan 's Principle_:
       | 
       |  _A discrete decision based upon an input having a continuous
       | range of values cannot be made within a bounded length of time._
       | 
       | Quoting from https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/buridan.pdf:
       | 
       |  _" The significance of Buridan's Principle lies in its warning
       | that decisions may, in rare circumstances, take much longer than
       | expected. Before the problem was recognized by computer
       | designers, some computer systems probably failed regularly
       | (perhaps once or twice a week) because arbiters took longer than
       | expected to reach a decision. Real accidents may occur because
       | people cannot decide in time which of two alternative actions to
       | take, even though either would prevent the accident. Although
       | Buridan's Principle implies that the possibility of such an
       | accident cannot be eliminated, awareness of the problem could
       | lead to methods for reducing its probability."_
       | 
       | In the accompanying notes at
       | https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/pubs.html, Lamport states:
       | 
       |  _The four reviews ranged from "This well-written paper is of
       | major philosophical importance" to "This may be an elaborate
       | joke." One of the other reviews was more mildly positive, and the
       | fourth said simply "My feeling is that it is rather superficial."
       | The paper was rejected._
        
         | l33t2328 wrote:
         | What about a decision like "can this wave be faithfully
         | represented by this set of points?"
         | 
         | Wouldn't the Sampling Theorem give an answer in some bounded
         | time? Is the idea that the time required to crank the algorithm
         | can grow without bound?
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | user3939382 wrote:
       | I once carefully read his bio and accomplishments and have felt
       | like a failure ever since.
        
       | dboreham wrote:
       | His later work prompted me to learn Order Theory, which has
       | turned out to be useful for all sorts of things. Also quite
       | closely related to Category Theory which I wouldn't have had much
       | chance of grokking without first understanding Order Theory, I
       | suspect.
       | 
       | I also used LaTeX heavily in the 80s so was surprised to see him
       | pop up as a genius of distributed systems later (although that
       | work was published much earlier it didn't get much exposure until
       | the 90s). Like "oh that guy must be _really_ smart to excel in
       | two quite different fields".
        
         | mhh__ wrote:
         | He wrote some interesting stuff on mathematics and physics in
         | the 60s too but it's all lost to time apparently.
        
         | SkyMarshal wrote:
         | Are there any good resources you recommend for learning Order
         | Theory?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-24 23:00 UTC)