[HN Gopher] Show HN: A Reddit style site to discuss podcast epis... ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: A Reddit style site to discuss podcast episodes Author : wolframhempel Score : 213 points Date : 2022-05-27 09:15 UTC (13 hours ago) (HTM) web link (podbabble.com) (TXT) w3m dump (podbabble.com) | calpar111 wrote: | ekpyrotic wrote: | Huge well done on launching. | | I can see a significant amount of scepticism in the comments, and | I think that much of the feedback is valuable and important, such | as the lack of a 'point of difference', interface, value-add | above existing solutions, etc. | | But, a little disappointed with the pessimism in the comments in | general. Someone has gone out of their way to build something | from scratch and, regardless of whether it ticks all the boxes at | the moment, I think that deserves positivity and a big 'well | done'. | | Projects rarely ever launch 100pc perfect -- or even 20pc | perfect. It is best to launch, adapt, and iterate. | | Note to poster: try to imagine that all the comments here start | with 'Well done for launching, but something you might want to | think about is...' Lots of the points are valid and require your | attention, but they have been presented in a defeatist and | negative way -- as if your launch is the end of matter and, as a | result, it is all doomed to failure rather than providing a | springboard to change, improve, and pivot as required. | tacoluv wrote: | Agreed with all points. Also, look at the comment histories of | most of the negative commenters. Haters gonna hate. | jayroh wrote: | I really appreciate this comment. Thank you for framing it this | way, sincerely. | | Doing the work is hard. Putting yourself out there in a | vulnerable state and hoping for the best is almost AS | difficult. | | So, the best of luck to the OP. Adapt and grow. | pvg wrote: | _But, a little disappointed with the pessimism in the comments_ | | The comments change as the thread develops so if you really | want to help a Show HN out, just write your positive comment | (or whatever other comment) about the thing without the meta. | It ends up being either inaccurate or generating more meta. Let | the Show HN be about the thing showhn. | [deleted] | [deleted] | I-M-S wrote: | Neat idea! As a podcaster I would love to be able to get feedback | on my episodes this way. Have you ever considered adding the | ability to embed it on external websites? | | Also, I tried claiming my podcast and commenting but neither | seems to have worked for me. Perhaps because of high traffic? | wolframhempel wrote: | Really sorry. I can see repeated attempts for a podcast | verification email sent out to a*@**o.org, but the email seems | to bounce. If this is you, could you let me know at | team@podbabble.com and I'd be happy to help sort it out. | shreyshnaccount wrote: | Why not just r/podcadts? | shreyshnaccount wrote: | Genuine question, cuz i wanted to build something similar, but | didn't cuz looking at that subreddit it seemed it was not very | active and all the podcast communities were very fragmented | costcofries wrote: | I wish your homepage made it easier to more quickly engage in | podcast discussion. Right now, my feedback is that it takes too | long to get to proof of value, your UI is confusing and it's not | clear to me what, or how, I can get to 'discussing podcasts'. | causality0 wrote: | Yes, loading is quite slow. I typed in a name and the search | result showed almost instantly but it took over thirty seconds | to actually get to the comment section. There's no reason you | need to embed a player for the episode on the comment page. If | I'm going to go to a web page and comment on a podcast I've | already listened to the podcast. | unholiness wrote: | There's definitely reasons for it (to easily link to clips in | comments) but there's no reason to block loading the comments | on loading the episode or the player | wolframhempel wrote: | That's fair. When you are the first user to ever visit a | site for an episode, we pull info from the show's RSS feed. | So unfortunately we depend on the RSS feed host's response | time. | | But the experience around it can and should definitely be a | lot smoother. | waylandsmithers wrote: | My thoughts exactly... I'm not sure if you can call it a reddit | for podcasts if there's no logged out view | wolframhempel wrote: | I'm not sure I'm following. You can jump into any podcast | discussion via the homepage, either by clicking a comment or | by searching for a podcast. You don't need an account to see | discussion boards and you can even comment anonymously. | giarc wrote: | You are referring to those comments in the top right of the | page? If so, that isn't obvious, it looks like a demo | image. | wolframhempel wrote: | fair enough :-) | zeven7 wrote: | > I'm not sure I'm following | | Sign out of reddit and take a look at the homepage. You | will see something very different from your homepage. It is | a much easier interface to get started with. I lurked on | reddit's homepage for a year before I ever created an | account or looked into specific subreddits that might | interest me. | jjwiseman wrote: | Also see FanFare, the metafilter site for discussing podcasts | (and movies, TV, and books): https://fanfare.metafilter.com. | Costs $5 for a lifetime membership. | SheddingPattern wrote: | Would it be interesting to do this for all knowledge artefacts? | Books, articles, blog posts, blogs. It would create a graph of | all these works after all they/respond to each other but also who | reads what. | CaptainJustin wrote: | So glad to see this. There is a real opportunity to create a | decent space for these discussions. Allowing the podcast host to | determine the governance model could get interesting and the | possibility of allowing podcasts to monetize their /r/ could make | it attractive to them | CaptainJustin wrote: | On the other side of things, I wonder if you could create a | decent value prop for podcast clients to embed your chat bit | inline or similar | gman83 wrote: | I've been using Podchaser, it's less about comments, more about | community reviews: https://www.podchaser.com/ | sudden_dystopia wrote: | There is only one episode of the largest podcast so looks like | you have some work to do still. | wolframhempel wrote: | that's not good - which one is that? | Shadonototra wrote: | the only audio oriented comment system that i appreciate was the | one from soundcloud | | you select the exact time, and you put your comment | | everyone listening to that music could see what people say about | that very specific moment, as they listen | | encouraging podcast creators to time their podcast would allow | platforms to offer precise comment system that users can consume | and contribute to consistently | | but nobody cares, because the people who build the platforms are | not users, it's not built organically, therefore they don't | understand these kind of special things | okr wrote: | yep, soundcloud popped up in my head immediately. Another | missed chance by soundcloud. | getpost wrote: | Site QC: I clicked on the Twitter link in the footer. It | references podbabble1, an account that doesn't exist. | https://twitter.com/podbabble exists though. | [deleted] | pHollda wrote: | This is unnecessary. The Reddit for podcast episodes is Reddit. | pvg wrote: | https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html | | _In Comments | | Be respectful. Anyone sharing work is making a contribution, | however modest. | | [...] | | When something isn't good, you needn't pretend that it is, but | don't be gratuitously negative._ | CharlesW wrote: | Setting aside the first sentence, I think this is valuable | feedback for Wolfram. | | Podcasters will need to meet listeners where they hang out | (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) _regardless_ of | whether they can also be persuaded to use this additional | niche social media site. | | Any podcaster who would use this service will have already | created a multi-channel social media presence for their show, | so instead of "do this instead" the sales pitch must answer | "why do this as well". | pvg wrote: | You can make the argument any feedback is 'valuable' sort | of like people contrive to defend entirely offtopic or | incomprehensible comments as 'relevant'. But HN discussions | have additional standards and not being a terse, dismissive | jerk, especially about the work of others is one of the | important ones. | CharlesW wrote: | Fair enough! Hopefully you found my comment kinder and | more useful than the OP's. | twobitshifter wrote: | I disagree, craigslist unbundling has been a successful | strategy for many startups, why not the same for reddit? | onlyfortoday2 wrote: | wolframhempel wrote: | Some podcasts have reddit boards, some are mainly discussed on | Twitter, some run Slack Channels, some publish on Youtube and | use its live commentary in the chat - most use a mix of these. | | I appreciate this is a bit like the "we have 14 competing | standards" XKCD, but there's a deeper, underlying problem that | Podbabble tries to tackle: The majority of podcast discussion | is either too general (i.e. debating the hashtag of a show as | opposed to a specific episode), ephemeral (i.e. Twitter or live | chat where discussion only happens within a few hours of | episode release) and its almost always distributed (some on | Reddit, some here, some there.) | | Podcasting - albeit still comparatively tiny) is the fastest | growing medium and I am confident that having a central, | purpose built place for listener engagement will add value to | the ecosystem. | carabiner wrote: | /r/redscarepod | | /r/JoeRogan | | These aren't just discussion groups for the podcasts - many | of the users in these subreddits don't even listen to the | podcasts. The subreddits for these podcasts have evolved as | their own, independent communities. Why would they just up | and leave for yours? | bnralt wrote: | Indeed. And I was just thinking about how sites like Reddit and | Hacker News are terrible when it comes to discussing things | like podcasts or building a community. An active web forum is | what would be really useful. | | For example, the podcast subs I frequent on Reddit often have | people posting the same questions over and over again. A forum | would simply aggregate them into one post that gets bumped to | the top when someone comments, perhaps with the first post | collating all the information as time goes on. But on the | Reddit style boards, the discussion disappears soon after it's | posted, just when the information starts to get there. It drops | off the front page forever, and a couple days later someone | comes along asking the exact same thing. Every podcast | discussion starts from scratch, and ends soon afterwards. If | you're a day or two late to a discussion, chances are no one | will even your response. | irrational wrote: | > A forum would simply aggregate them into one post that gets | bumped to the top when someone comments, perhaps with the | first post collating all the information as time goes on. But | on the Reddit style boards, the discussion disappears soon | after it's posted, just when the information starts to get | there. | | This isn't necessarily true. It sounds to me like you only | have experience with some of the larger subreddits like | r/pics. If you frequent smaller hobby subreddits you will | find that the moderators will do exactly what is being | described here. Some are pinned on a permanent basis, others | are rotated out on a weekly or daily basis. The tools to do | this are already baked into Reddit, it is up to the | moderators of each subreddit whether to use them or not. | bnralt wrote: | > It sounds to me like you only have experience with some | of the larger subreddits like r/pics. | | As I said in my post, I frequent podcast subs, which are | usually on the smaller side to things. Sure, you can pin | posts, but only two at a time, which means they often get | dropped and switched. And unless they're extremely recent | (so you're pinning posts all the time), as soon as they get | dropped, they disappear. Spent 30 minutes writing a post to | a pin discussion that you posted minutes before moderators | switched the pinned post to something else? Chances are, no | one's ever going to see it. | | But a bigger problem is how nothing gets bumped to the top | in those places. If I randomly stumble across a 5 year old | discussion on IMDB and post a comment, it's going to be | bumped to the top of the post list, and plenty of people | will see it. If followed a link from something pinned to | the top of a Reddit sub to a 10 day old discussion and make | a comment, it's likely no one will see it. The only way | people would even know there was a new comment is if they | kept checking all of the dead conversations that have | already fallen off the front page. | | And the upvoting/downvoting exacerbates this further. It's | not just that you're limited to the most recent posts if | you want someone to see what you've said, but you're often | stuck replying to the most upvoted comments to that post. | | I'm surprised if I get a comment or upvotes on site like | Reddit or Hacker News after a couple of days. On the | webforums I frequent, I often get them after _years_. If | this were a forum, I'd probably be making this post later | tonight or later in the week. But on Hacker News, if I | don't make it in the next couple hours it's likely no one | would ever see my response. | raspberry1337 wrote: | >The Reddit for podcast episodes is Reddit. | | Yes and this is the problem, reddit is reddit and the comment- | quality is terribly low, often toxic and dominated by a certain | ideology that is particularly dominant and vocal on reddit in | particular. I think this has potential if they manage to keep | the comment quality higher, somehow. | Sakos wrote: | This is highly dependent on the moderators. If you have good | moderators, you can have a subreddit with quality posts and | comments rivaling HN. If you have bad ones, it can (and will) | devolve into toxicity and ideological bubbling. I've seen | both and I've seen ones in between. | | That said, maybe I'm just not in the loop, but I'm not aware | of any subreddit dedicated to reviewing podcast episodes. | Also, I'm not sure the Reddit format lends itself to creating | a database of user reviews for certain episodes without | _heavy_ moderation and a heavy-handed approach to posting | (for example, to avoid duplicates). A lot of this needs to be | formulated into an automated system that only a custom-made | site can offer. | bin_bash wrote: | I was a heavy user of Reddit since it came out until about | a year ago. I left precisely because it felt like every | single subreddit I was talking to children. | irrational wrote: | It sounds to me like you only visit the larger toxic | subreddits. There are many hobby subreddits where the tone is | positive and uplifting. It's not Reddit as a whole that is | the problem, but what subreddits you are visiting. Here is a | hint, any subreddit that makes it to r/popular should never | be visited. | TameAntelope wrote: | There are also many hobby subreddits where the moderators | are jerks and have zero clue how to manage or grow a | community. | | There may be some "goldilocks" subreddit size, but IMO | there are approaching zero Reddit communities that are | "healthily" run, probably because most of the people | involved (users, mods) are literal, actual children. | irrational wrote: | That hasn't been my experience. I've been pleased, for | the most part, with how r/woodworking, r/boardgames, | r/cooking, r/18xx, r/cooking, r/gardening, | r/boardgamedeals, r/visitingiceland, etc. are run. I've | run into very few toxic subreddits. | TameAntelope wrote: | Do you (or anyone here) think it's possible to unbundle Reddit | communities? | | Or is Reddit the "perfect" community engine? | [deleted] | swal_ wrote: | I love the idea and monetization model, trawling through the rest | of a subreddit to find the thread for a recent episode can be | tedious. | | Congrats on the launch, I have a couple of questions. Is it only | for discussions around recent episodes? Or is it just that the | specific podcasts i've searched for don't list all episodes? | wolframhempel wrote: | It really depends on the podcast. We run it of the podcast's | RSS feed, some of which include the entire archive, some just a | number of recent episodes. Some podcast players create their | own archive to patch this which is something we might need to | do as well. | Zren wrote: | There's no way of going from a podcast | (/podcast/SHOW/EPISODE/UUID) to the show (/podcast/SHOW). I had | to manually edit the URL. | | Visually, this is more like SoundCloud than Reddit, though that's | probably because there's no discussions more than 2 comments deep | to notice the difference. | gnicholas wrote: | I've wanted to find a podcast app that would allow me to easily | pause, select a segment, and then tweet (preferably with auto | transcript) or share on FB. | | I assume that I could make an anon comment here and then share a | link to my comment on social media? | | EDIT: someone mentioned that podcasters have to pay for access -- | if this is true, would it mean that I could only comment on | certain podcasts? This would be a huge limitation for me, and | would make me very unlikely to spend much time on the site. | | I would recommend letting people comment on any podcast, but if | podcasts want to show up on your topical lists then they have to | pay. There are probably other better ways to feature gate; this | is just one idea. | getpost wrote: | $29/mo seems high for the vast majority of podcasts, which are | labors of love run on shoestring budgets. Of course, it's peanuts | for the high traffic sites. Did you consider a Dropbox-like | pricing model, e.g., free for low-traffic sites? | cheriot wrote: | Especially if podcasters will bring their audience a free tier | can boost growth. Then charge for power tools. Find the things | that professional podcasters need that amateur podcasters don't | and charge for those. | shafyy wrote: | When I search for "Absolutely Mental" and click on any season, it | leads to this error page: https://podbabble.com/podcast/undefined | Kwpolska wrote: | The discovery experience is terrible. There's a feed of recent | comments, but the largest and most noticeable piece of content is | the podcast artwork, not the comment text (and the layout feels a | bit unintuitive). To find podcasts, I would need to manually copy | all podcast names into the (very slow) search box. And then most | of them would have 0 comments, since the service is new, or my | podcast taste is niche. It might be better to have a list of | shows, sorted by comment count (or otherwise popularity on your | site). | [deleted] | rc_mob wrote: | its amazing you tracked so many episodes somehow. i think one | small thing to add is just a 5 star rating of each episode or | something | jamil7 wrote: | I couldn't find a way to delete an account, so signup with a | burner if you want to check it out. | wolframhempel wrote: | You can comment anonymously if you wish | jamil7 wrote: | I didn't realise that thanks, however you still need to give | people a way to delete their account. | troika wrote: | Absolutely, of course. We've just launched and there are a | number of features missing | Kwpolska wrote: | In the times of GDPR and CCPA, there is no excuse for not | having a simple way to delete your data. You should be | able to revoke consent and remove your data as easily as | you provided consent. | tomschwiha wrote: | As you target also European users you should look into the cookie | consent - continue browsing the site as accepting cookies is no | consent. | tasuki wrote: | I'm European, and don't want to see any cookie consent | banners/popups ever. They are awful. If you don't want cookies, | your browser has a perfectly fine setting to disable them. | yjftsjthsd-h wrote: | And IANAL but AIUI most of those banners are illegal anyways; | just browsing the site isn't consent and you're generally not | allowed to force the issue unless the cookies in question are | actually functionally useful to the user. At least I think | that's how it works, I'm really not a lawyer and this isn't | something that I pay much attention to. | probably_wrong wrote: | I like that I can read a comment for a podcast I've never heard | of before and jump into the exact timestamp being discussed with | a single click. I also like that I can read comments without | logging in, so I can judge the quality of the discussion before | deciding to sign up. | | Things that could be improved: the site is a bit slow and I got | at least one broken image - I imagine it is getting HN'd right | now, though, so I'll check again later. I also agree with the | main page being unfriendly - if it weren't for the side bar, I | would have probably never tried it. I also wanted to go to a | show's full list of discussions, but I didn't find a way. | | Overall I like it. | mcluck wrote: | This looks like it's still in the early days but are there any | plans to integrate with other podcast providers? I usually listen | to podcasts via Spotify and it could be cool to see the comments | streaming by like they were lyrics or the chat on a Twitch | stream. | jatinkrmalik wrote: | Pardon my skepticism but how is this any better than r/podcasts/ | - an existing community of ~2Mn+ people? | bin_bash wrote: | I haven't looked at this product but as a listener of podcasts | I can think of 2 obvious reasons. | | First, r/podcasts is for all podcasts, I'd be more interested | in a community for a specific podcasts (say my favorite one: | Dithering). | | But also a r/dithering wouldn't really work that well since I | might not be listening to a particular episode right when it | came out. I'd prefer to talk to people about only the most | recent episode I listened to. | | Of course a r/dithering could simply have a meta post for each | episode but that isn't that easy to find. | soneil wrote: | It looks like it'd work pretty well if you're listening to them | at the same site - so comments are tagged with the timestamp, | soundcloud-esque. | | I can kinda see the logic - unfortunately sitting in front of | my computer is my least favourite way to consume podcasts - and | the workflow seems to break down quickly once you disassociate | the two. | janmarsal wrote: | The empire, long divided, must unite; long united, must divide. | Thus it has ever been. | tuwtuwtuwtuw wrote: | How do people discuss specific podcasts there? Never visited | that subreddit before but the top entries seems to be | discussion about podcasts, not discussions about content in | podcast episodes. | MarcellusDrum wrote: | Popular podcasts have their own subreddits that discuss each | episode. Having a separate app/platform for this is going to | be hard to sell. | pHollda wrote: | Exactly. CC r/PKA for example. It's like how TV Shows have | their own subreddits, not just r/television. | tuwtuwtuwtuw wrote: | The person I replied to was comparing it to r/podcasts and | bringing up the subscriber count there. | qhrrrasd wrote: | To give it a try i typed "sceptics" and selected Sceptics Guide | to the Universe which results in redirection to | https://podbabble.com/podcast/undefined and an error "Error: | could not handle the request" | unholiness wrote: | I got the same searching "mindscape" but tried again and it | worked. I think it's a race condition in the search-as-you-type | system (which also appears to have some flakiness, with | searches from previous searches showing up after the latest | search arrived). | peanut_worm wrote: | Very cool idea but the website seems awfully slow with all the | animations and loading screens, and the audio player seems to | keep resizing and lagging. | maweki wrote: | Somehow the podcast library is a bit mixed up with multiple | podcasts of the same name. If you look for the "Greatest | Generation" Star Trek podcast, the preview indeed shows the Star | Trek podcast but clicking it brings you to a completely different | podcast of the same name. | | Not a good look in terms of data quality here. | unholiness wrote: | The biggest thing missing for me getting started is a reddit-like | "feed" showing where discussion is actually happening. Like the | reddit logged-out homepage (/best, not /new). | | The value of Podbabble is the intersection of podcast episodes | that 1) people are talking about and 2) I have listened to. Right | now the only way for me to find that intersection is to start | from (2), searching for every podcast I can think of, looking at | several of the latest episodes and seeing there's no comments. It | would be great to start from (1), so I can see right away which | episodes people are discussing and see which ones might be | relevant to me. | | Also, it seems like the only way to add a podcast to "my | podcasts" is with an RSS feed link? Not from a link on the | podcast's page I searched for? I'm unsure on what the desired | setup workflow is. | edgyquant wrote: | This is good and what is needed. These feeds bring people in | who aren't specifically seeking to discuss an episode of a | podcast they like. | cheriot wrote: | 100% this ^. I listen podcasts daily, am interested in | discovering new ones, and do not create any podcasts. Looking | at the home page I'm not sure how to find any content. | Definitely not interested in creating an account just to see | what's there. | | I recommend reading Reddit's origin story. There needs to be | interesting content to get the first users to create content. | | Maybe the goal is to sell podcasters and get them to bring | their audience? Even then I think you need a good home page | experience to hook those listeners. | edgyquant wrote: | Why would anyone want to recreate Reddit? Discovery can be | its own app that is very good at recommending podcasts. This | can be for discussions, like how forums used to be. | | Keep them separate, because the world needs to get back to | what we had with forums where people interested in subjects | sought ought a place to discuss them. Back then actual | discussions happened and the entire world wasn't a giant | flamewar. | cheriot wrote: | I didn't say recreate reddit. The point of the reddit | origin story is that people will only start contributing | content if there's already interesting content there. | | If I host a new forum and just leave it on the internet, | will someone create a account and post when there's zero | messages there? Unlikely. | | Ergo, founders of a social site need to seed it with | interesting enough content that the first users will stick | around. | edgyquant wrote: | Right and I'm suggesting Reddits origin story leads to a | website like Reddit, and is not something anyone should | seek to reproduce (unless being Reddit is your goal.) | Making fake accounts isn't the way to go if you want a | decent discussion site specifically for podcasts. | Otherwise You already have subreddits for every most of | them. | | The niche of a site like this is to not be going for | growth at the expense of intellectual discussion. | NaturalPhallacy wrote: | Reddit's design is based on IRC. Subreddits are channels. | | You could just say your site is like that. | npollock wrote: | A few challenges I think you should consider: | | 1. People do their podcast listening on other platforms/players - | what's the incentive for them to comment/post on Podbabble? | | 2. Podcasts have existing community/discussion on other platforms | (FB, Discord, etc) that are free - what would motivate them to | pay this service? | | 3. Could you demonstrate that Podbabble drives growth/downloads? | That would motivate hosts and podcast marketers | ushakov wrote: | you can never grow a project like this if you demand money for | entry | | as much as i hate ads, i'd say that for this type of project it's | better to leave it free but show some relevant podcast ads | atentaten wrote: | >you can never grow a project like this if you demand money for | entry | | How are you categorizing this project? What about it makes you | think demanding money for entry is not feasible for growth? | [deleted] | [deleted] | newsclues wrote: | tuwtuwtuwtuw wrote: | I think the host sign-up flow is a bit odd. I can enter any | podcast name and have that trigger an email to the authors of | that podcast (multiple times? I hope not). | | Seems like it would make more sense that an author could create | an account on the site and then link podcasts to it. Triggering | an email to podcast authors because I selected their podcast in a | drop down feels a bit spammy. | Aachen wrote: | How does this work? I went to an episode of Nerdland, posted a | comment, saw a brief loading icon and the input area emptied | itself and... poof, nothing happened. Reloaded page, no comment. | Tried posting again, but no comment appeared. | | Is the commenting system overloaded? Do I need to login first (it | doesn't say so)? Does it need to be able to talk to Stripe the | payment network to place comments (TrackerControl app shows that | as the only detected tracker while using the site)? I didn't | include links or markup, so if it was detected as spam (again: | there's no mention of that, no error, no nothing) then I'd not | know why. | twistedcheeslet wrote: | Promising once it has a volume of users. At first though, I | imagine it would attract relatively new podcasts that don't yet | have established communities. | | That said, until it reaches some critical mass which adds value | to creators in terms of discovery and community, asking small | time creators to fork out 360USD per year is quite a big ask. | quickthrower2 wrote: | It is not very reddit like to charge money to post. | CharlesW wrote: | > _...asking small time creators to fork out 360USD per year is | quite a big ask._ | | Especially given that (1) podcasters would be the primary | driver of users to this service, and (2) podcasters will also | be doing all the moderation work. | dangoor wrote: | I like the idea of this! I don't feel like I'm unusual in that I | listen to my podcasts in a player app (Overcast, in my case), and | always away from a computer. It would be really cool if this had | an API that podcast apps could talk to for comments (maybe the | creator of the feed has the ability to include a link to the API | in the metadata, making an open ecosystem of podcast comment | tools) | falafelite wrote: | I listen to a lot of podcasts, and I think this is really really | cool. Would certainly become a better and better experience (I | think?) as more people leave comments on episodes. | rnernento wrote: | Reddit never started by taking me to a giant signup page for a | paid subscription. As someone who was mildly curious and might | have checked it out of you presented something interesting I | immediately left, maybe think about making the base landing page | more interesting in hopes of gaining traction with users and then | make another landing page for people you want to sell the service | to. | wolframhempel wrote: | Podbabble is free for users. It only charges you if you want to | become a verified host and moderate your podcast boards. To me, | this is preferable to selling your data and advertising to you. | (https://www.reddit.com/policies/privacy-policy- | revision-2021...) | Sakos wrote: | I think it's odd to give sole control of moderation to | podcast creators. It quickly leads to creators sanitising | feedback to prefer only positive feedback. | wolframhempel wrote: | That's fair and its something we will have to get right | over time. But its also tricky to find an ethical | monetization model for social media. | | You can sell your user's data to advertisers, or you can | sell control or you can find some other channel. | | We're e.g. playing with the idea to add a live podcasting | feature that allows user's to comment and tip during a show | a la Twitch. | sjostrom7 wrote: | Agreed with the other user - if you can get livecast + | tipping going that'll be your hook. Hosts will then have | a specific reason to plug your platform. Best of luck, | very promising! | PogoPuppy wrote: | Your latter idea is golden, in my opinion. Some of the | podcasts I subscribe to regularly complain about their | live cast options. | cupofpython wrote: | >It quickly leads to creators sanitising feedback to prefer | only positive feedback | | I dont see this as a big issue. It seems to be a place for | podcast community members to gather and discuss instead of | making yet another discord. If you dont have positive | feedback for a podcast why comment at all to begin with? | The podcast medium is entirely built to taste and fits well | with being a bubble (despite bubbles usually being a | negative thing). | | The hidden issue would be power to cover up a scandal, so I | would hope that for serious issues users can report a | podcast and site admins can handle it appropriately. | murphyslab wrote: | > If you dont have positive feedback for a podcast why | comment at all to begin with? | | The quality of a podcast is not going to be uniformly | positive. So a listener's feedback isn't going to be | uniformly positive. It becomes a problem when the primary | space for discussing a subject only permits positive | feedback. Healthy communities do require negative | feedback. | | It's ironic that creator of Podbabble couches the | creator-based moderation as a means to | | > Foster healthy communities. Podbabble lets you | moderate, adjust ratings, and flag comments as you see | fit. | | Too often, allowing the subject of a forum to moderate | the forum leads to suppression of valid critique. And | good critique can also come from outsiders; those who are | not regular listeners. | | A better alternative for Podbabble would be to allow | creators to sponsor their podcast's forum, perhaps having | it be featured more prominently or by removing comment | rate limits. | infinityio wrote: | Personally, I'd recommend making more of the homepage the | actual site, in the style of Reddit or HN's homepage - | hopefully, the content that will be surfaced will explain it | better than marketing does (and make it seem less closed | off!) | closedloop129 wrote: | The main point is not whether it's free or not but that the | main page is a landing page. If you visit Reddit, you | immediately see content, you are one click away from reading | comments. Registering is optional and comes naturally when | you want to write a comment yourself. | | To convince your visitors, your site is just a landing page. | It requires commitment to an account before it is possible to | judge the site. | | I don't have the experience to judge if that is a good | strategy. But if you want to be the Reddit of podcast | discussions, then you should show the discussions to the | visitors and only request accounts from those who want to | write comments. | penneyd wrote: | I agree with this, I clicked to check it out and left after | it appeared I had to sign up, sure I'm not alone. | wolframhempel wrote: | We had a lot of discussion about it, but it's a chicken and | egg problem. We just launched, so there isn't much content | to show straight away - and we felt it's worth explaining | the concept. As content grows, we want to shift to a | "content only" view for the homepage. | | It's important to stress that Podbabble doesn't require | accounts to view discussions - in fact, you can even | comment anonymously without creating an account. If you | click on any of the comments on the homepage or choose a | podcast via search you'll immediately taken to its | discussion page without any barriers. | rnernento wrote: | I think if you ever want there to actually be content you | need a way to grab users and make it easy for them to | start generating it. | | When you say "it's a chicken and an egg problem" you're | spot on. That's the problem for every new social network | or user based platform trying to launch. Until you have a | ton of users and content I would argue it's the only | problem worth worrying about. | sfg wrote: | Get rid of the landing page and get straight to the | content. | | Create content yourselves to fill the void until it | grows. | rnernento wrote: | I'm not criticizing your business model, I'm just saying as a | user who doesn't care about your business model and is just | curious about podcast discussions your homepage isn't | optimized for me. | | If you focus on building a userbase first it will be easier | to sell the service later. | | As a user I have a billion things competing for my attention, | if you don't make it super easy for me to get to useful or | interesting content I'm going to move on and that's going to | hurt you overall. | sfg wrote: | Yeah, I got to the landing page and left immediately. | | I want to see what the site is about before signing up or doing | anything. | [deleted] | robotjosh wrote: | float4 wrote: | First podcast on the right: Ben Shapiro. So I scroll down to | check out the second podcast: Jordan Peterson. | | Not really in the mood to join such a community. | husainfazel wrote: | They're using some kind of API to get the podcasts since a very | rare pod that I followed showed up - so maybe that's just due | to the listeners that BS and JP have. | wolframhempel wrote: | That's right. There is no sophisticated feed algorithm (yet | :-). It literally just pulls the most recent comments on the | platform - | [deleted] | TameAntelope wrote: | Those are two of the most popular voices in this medium, it'd | be needlessly limiting to exclude them if you're trying to | launch a business around discussing podcasts. | | For every one of you, there may be a dozen people who are | _attracted_ to the platform for the fact that these two are | included. | bee_rider wrote: | Yeah, I'd probably not highlight political podcasts on the | front page if I was going for a general audience. Risks | snowballing and becoming a partisan site (I'd also not | highlight, say, a Crooked Media podcast there, despite being a | fan...) | owlbynight wrote: | Great idea, but bad execution. UI is not good. I expected | examples of popular podcasts on the front page that I could | immediately engage with. However, I was met by confusion. It took | me way too long to realize that the search bar was the only | method of discovery. | | In my opinion, this isn't even at the beta level yet, let alone | at a point where you should be asking for a subscription fee that | high. | | I'll keep an eye on this because this interests me, but the | initial red flags give me pause. You need a talented UI/UX person | pretty badly. | [deleted] | alaxsxaq wrote: | I searched for two podcasts; one failed with an error ('Error: | could not handle the request) [No Agenda]. I tested another one, | [eggchasers], and that worked reasonably well. My main criticism | is that, when a search returns something meaningful, there is not | a lot there to compel me to create an account and drill in | deeper. If I were designing this, I would seed the 'sign up' | presentation to new users with some relevant bits from the | conversations which are happening on your site. If there are no | current conversations, then some message which would spark my | desire to start one. | | Also, what value does the acast privacy link for each episode | provide that wouldn't alternatively be provided by some header | element? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-27 23:00 UTC)