[HN Gopher] Friendships form via shared context, not shared acti... ___________________________________________________________________ Friendships form via shared context, not shared activities Author : Kortaggio Score : 145 points Date : 2022-05-30 19:08 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (billmei.net) (TXT) w3m dump (billmei.net) | lordnacho wrote: | Isn't activity just a part of context? | | Kick-about in the park -> simple activity, not many connections | formed | | Weekly football team -> training, trips, club events -> more | connections formed | | From my life the easiest connections are the ones where you're | stuck together for a long time, eg education. You do pretty much | everything together for years, you end up visiting each other's | parents, you know each other's siblings, friends for life. In | fact it's a reasonable test of how good friends you are with | someone, whether you visited their house, know their family, know | their friends, and know their CV. | | Work is a little bit different. People are coming and going, | there's a hierarchy as well, and also people are busy and have | already got a friend group. That being said there's still the | "always together" element so plenty of opportunity. | | A more recent one is the "other parents in your kid's year". You | end up hanging around your kid's friends parents a fair bit, and | there's a fair chance they are similar to you. Which brings me to | friend templates... | | Meet a few people and like the article says, you will find many | have similar attributes. Often you end up meeting people who have | basically had parallel lives to yourself, in two ways: | | - They literally have the same friends as you. I have this guy I | went to school with briefly, who then turns up in all my friends' | stories about what they got up to over the years, without me | actually meeting him. Like a comedy show, he's just left when I | arrive. I even had a random guy on an international flight tell | me he was going to go see this guy, and I identified it because I | knew so much about him. Anyway this is probably something that's | happened to a fair few people, but they end up seeing the guy in | real life and becoming friends. | | - They have done the same things as you, unconnected. They went | to your uni, or studied what you studied. They work in your line | of work. When you were kids, you had the same interests. They're | from your city. These kinds of people are great seeds for | relationships, but there's lots of them, and not all of them are | watered. | productceo wrote: | When the writer says friendships, I believe the writer means | communities, such as community of place. | rozim wrote: | Well, a variation on this is what Nobel prize winner Bob Dylan | says in Brownsville Girl, that shared suffering is important: | "Strange how people who suffer together have stronger connections | than people who are most content." | | Maybe suffering here can be interpreted as shared challenges. | qgin wrote: | On average, people need about 100 hours of interaction to feel a | friendship connection. | | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265407518761225 | iLoveOncall wrote: | Given the methodology of the study I wouldn't trust it one bit. | iLoveOncall wrote: | What I got out of this article is that some psychos share their | wifi passwords with strangers. | ripvanwinkle wrote: | I think the article is spot on about friendships forming from | shared context. | | However, shared activities are often the precursor to shared | context - so joining a swim team or a bike team or any group | activity is still a good idea. | | Doing shared activities with some regularity is one way to build | shared context and ultimately friendship. | pessimizer wrote: | I had this realization somewhere around turning 30. I had been a | touring musician in my teens and early twenties, and those were | the friendships I had. I realized at one point that I had | selected friends based on the kinds of music that they liked and | whether I had partied with them, and that those were dumb | criteria for friends. | | I vowed from then on I would choose who to hang out with based on | how kind, thoughtful, and trustworthy they were, and that I would | stop having endless worthless conversations about bands and other | products. I could just enjoy the stuff that I was into without | making it into a identity. Never looked back. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | > One way to create a shared context is through shared struggle. | | Can't agree with this enough. Nearly all of my best friendships | have been people I've met through a shared goal that required a | ton of work (e.g. some intensive artistic training as a youth, | early startup jobs, etc.) | | I always realize how lucky I am to have had some of these intense | "struggles" pretty early on in my life, as I've met people who | didn't have that opportunity and I realize how my network of real | friendships has greatly benefited from that. | baxtr wrote: | I think he's onto something. Then again, why aren't we still | friends with everyone we spent a lot of time with when we were in | elementary school? I fear a critical component is missing. | layer8 wrote: | Because the context changed and lastingly stopped being a | shared one? | Pamar wrote: | Not only that but... how many of us have brothers and | sisters... but are not friends with them? | going_ham wrote: | I really can't understand the idea of friendship. Throughout my | life, I never had the opportunity to foster a meaningful friendly | relationship (one with trust, loyalty, support etc.) I found it | to be apparent when people toss over the things I do. | | I have a lot of acquaintances and friends but very few close | friends. Other than that, I feel like most people only talk with | me when they absolutely need something. Otherwise, I am always | the last person to be called on anything. | | > Becoming disentangled from your web of mutual commitments, | shared history, and collective responsibility is to be rendered | into a transaction, a slave. | | When author compared that having this "disentangled" social web | is like being enslaved to business, I couldn't relate it. Isn't | it completely normal? I don't want to idolize friendship, but | everything will end eventually. I have experienced this | throughout multiple phases of my life. No one of the so called | friends made effort to contact me once I disappeared from social | media. Only my close friends remained because I put the effort to | do so. When I stopped putting effort, even these relationship got | eroded (One can't clap with a single hand). This was the moment I | realized that there is no such thing as friendship which author | described. | | Life is what you give meaning to. It's nice that author is there | to foster social meaning. For some reason the post felt like it's | trying to create void that people without close friends are | missing things from life. When I came in peace that I can't rely | on any other person but myself, I found peace. | | Life has multiple dimensions. No one has to live in one way. It's | better to find our own ways and be happy with it. | | PS: Just a minor opinion! Do not take it personally. | PaulHoule wrote: | I think of that show _My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic_ where | the whole point is that the friends are all very different. | shaman1 wrote: | Congrats to the author, a good observation. I was just talking | with one of my friends who recently became a father about how | quickly new moms bond and form friendships due to the common | context. | | But similar interests can make the bond stronger and deeper I'd | argue. | gringoDan wrote: | I think this phenomenon is part of the reason it's difficult to | form friendships as adults. The shared context that the article | mentions requires a lot of time around your circle of people, | just "hanging out". It's tough to make that time as an adult with | a career, family, etc. | | This may be why college friendships can be so strong - often a | lot of time is spent living and working around friends by | default, without needing to schedule it. | JamesBarney wrote: | Yeah it's this, just shared time, specifically time hanging out | shooting the shit. | | For instance of all of my coworkers I am paradoxically the | closest to are the ones from out of town. I think this is | because when they visited they had no other obligations so we | ended up shooting the shit a lot. Where co-workers who lived | here were always busy with family/life obligations. | hosteur wrote: | If this is the case then why wouldn't workplaces create lots of | strong friendships? There is a lot of shared context. I'm not | sure I buy author's brushing this away as being because | coworkers are trained to replace you. There is lots of | competition in school and college also. | Enginerrrd wrote: | In my experience, workplaces HAVE created lots of strong | friendships in my life. | | Though, it's interesting, it varies tremendously by workplace | culture and the work you're doing. In my jobs doing manual | labor or jobs involving a lot of boring hanging out (as a | cashier / supervisor / lifeguard) I made lots of friendships. | In jobs where it's been primarily knowledge work, I had a lot | of good acquaintances, but rarely did that turn into more. I | think that being able to talk makes a big difference. It's | worth noting though that when I was a lifeguard, I was a long | lived employee surrounded by short term employees. The | culture was in flux. There are times when I fit in and we | became good friends (which remain to this day) and there are | times when I didn't fit in or like the people and didn't make | any friends. The manual labor jobs produced more lasting | friendships than the lifeguarding for whatever reason. | Something about actually suffering with others and working | toward common aims and being able to talk about stuff | produced the best friendships. (I also think that the nature | of the work filtered out some of the lower quality people | too, and that played a role.) | bobsmooth wrote: | Pretty much every friend I have is a co-worker. | bitcurious wrote: | To make friends you need to make mistakes. Litigation culture | in the workplace prevents that. | Sirened wrote: | is this a thinly veiled complaint about being hit with | sexual harassment complaints? The simple trick to solve | this problem is not to sexually harass your friends either | barry-cotter wrote: | You're a bad person and you should feel bad. | nickff wrote: | Why did you make two logical leaps just to arrive at an | accusation? | | From the HN Guidelines: " Please respond to the strongest | plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a | weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. | " | jacquesm wrote: | I don't see this. I've yet to be afraid of being sued by a | co-worker and after a couple of decades I can assure you | that I've made plenty of mistakes. | slothtrop wrote: | If you aren't more guarded around co-workers than your | friends, maybe you should be. | jacquesm wrote: | Why on earth would a co-worker sue me? | armchairhacker wrote: | I doubt "coworkers trying to replace you" has much of an | impact. | | The bigger issue with some workplaces is that they're _not_ | really close-quarters, because they're very impersonal. Sure | you might be all in the same room a lot, but you're largely | discussing business stuff or working independently. Even | corporate "parties" and retreats can be surprisingly | professional and unnatural. It's almost like you don't really | "interact" with the person, you interact with their business | facade. | | If you're not just talking business with your coworkers, | you're actually talking about life and hanging out and not | having a fake professional personality, then you do form | friendships. I say this from experience. | | Though talking about non-professional things and not putting | on a facade also makes you vulnerable, so those companies | where everyone is competing against each other happen to be | the ones where everyone is impersonal. | Dracophoenix wrote: | The workplace is more like a relay race than a basketball | team. Everyone may share the same project, but they all have | different parts to it, and are unlikely to share the same or | a sufficiently similar understanding of it. | Karrot_Kream wrote: | It does. A lot of younger knowledge workers (not at all | restricted to STEM) make good friends in their first job | because of shared context. Eventually increased | responsibility through experience means you necessarily open | yourself up less and spend more time mentoring, guiding, or | otherwise leading. | fleddr wrote: | I think you're right, you need proximity and significant time | together to create and maintain friendships. Which is very hard | to organize with adults. | | Another way to look at it is the shift in priorities. When I | was young, all I cared about is friends. I found it more | important than school or my parents. I maximized my time with | friends. | | As adult "friend", you're way down the list of priorities, | after the job, family, personal health, chores, recovery | time...and then there's you, the friend. It's not malice, | adults simply have too much shit to manage. | | Some might be so busy that the last thing they need is a new | friend. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > It's tough to make that time as an adult with a career, | family, etc. | | It's more difficult than college, where everyone is thrown | together into close quarters. | | However, it's not impossible. It's just different and requires | different techniques. If you sit back and wait for the contexts | to come to you, it's going to be a slow journey. If you go out | of your way to create those contexts, it's actually not that | difficult to find and make new friends. | | Hosting events, BBQs, get togethers, and any other social event | is an easy way to start it off. This gets massively easier when | you have kids, IMO, because you can now also host play dates, | invite other families along to activities, meet other parents | through daycare or school, and so on. It won't happen if you're | staying at home or waiting for people to come to you, of | course, but it's not that hard to get out and meet new people | and friends-of-friends once you start getting out there and | making an effort. | | Even work can be an easy pivot to new connections if you make | an effort. In-person makes this especially easy: Get into the | habit of inviting people out to lunch with you once a week and | ask if they can think of anyone else to invite along. The | bigger the company, the easier it is to be exposed to a lot of | new people this way. Again, it won't happen if you're not | making an effort, but the amount of effort required is much | smaller than it may seem. | danenania wrote: | A hack that takes advantage of this is to look for | activities/events where you spend a lot of sustained time with | others. | | So instead of a meetup once a month, go to a week-long retreat | or an all weekend hackathon. | | Or if there's someone you'd like to get closer to as a friend, | instead of just inviting them to hang out once in awhile, | invite them to go on a trip somewhere. | | Once you reach the tipping point of enough shared time/context | by fast-forwarding in this way, it's easier to then settle into | a more ordinary rhythm where you see people periodically but | still feel they are real friends. | zamfi wrote: | Having a family offers a natural avenue for this, though: | parents of your kids' friends share a lot of context with you. | goethes_kind wrote: | The reason friendships between adults are hard is because | adults are reluctant to make themselves vulnerable, but opening | yourself to others and making yourself vulnerable is exactly | what you need to start building a shared history of living | (shared context). | SnowHill9902 wrote: | Cf. propinquity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propinquity | tarr11 wrote: | I'm having trouble understanding what the author means by | "context" in this article. | | It seems to mean "your location within your network of people"? | lapcat wrote: | I found this article strange, because the author seemed to be | reversing cause and effect. Isn't "shared context" -- trust, | loyalty, love, belonging, safety -- the result of friendship | rather than the cause of friendship? How can you trust and be | loyal to someone you just met? | | "We can't help but desperately compete in this unwinnable game of | having the best collection of attributes to show off." I don't | get it, because friends don't need each other to be the best | person in the world at any given thing. Having things in common | seems to be enough, no? Does anyone need to be "unique", a | special snowflake in the world? In some sense friends are | interchangeable, in that it's a total accident of circumstances | which few of the billions of people on Earth you happen to hang | out with. But I'm not clear on why "global uniqueness" is | necessary for friendship. That seems to be an impossible | standard, and it's not the basis of any friendship I've ever had. | | "In my early attempts to make friends, I tried inviting people | with shared interests to activities like sailing or grabbing | brunch". I think the missing ingredient here is simply time. It's | hard to become friends in just a few hours. | | [Edit:] "One way to create a shared context is through shared | struggle. This is why many organizations implement ritualized | hazing to initiate new members, but the important thing is not | the hazing, it's the sense that you are working together with | your fellow humans to achieve a super-human goal." | | The super-human goal of getting your butt paddled by a frat boy? | No, hazing is just a perverse power play, nothing more. They do | hazing because they can, and get a kick out of it. | Barrin92 wrote: | >How can you trust and be loyal to someone you just met? | | Duty. that's what the military often is like and my experiences | with military friendships overlap a lot with the idea that long | lasting friendships are build around context, although I think | 'shared sense of purpose' describes it somewhat better. | | Starting a business together or going through disease or really | anything where people have real skin in the game and there's | something at stake is where people can form deep, meaningful | bonds quickly. | lapcat wrote: | Are you close friends with everyone you served with, though? | Isn't there someone in the military you _didn 't_ like? ;-) | | AFAICT the formula for friendship is pretty simple: time + | shared interests + personality/chemistry. The military is a | good way to spend a lot of time together, and maybe a shared | interest too. | Barrin92 wrote: | I'm actually still close friends with a lot of them, and | importantly that includes people I didn't really "like" | intuitively but I relied on for a long time. | | I don't think it's that simple really. Chemistry and | personality are overrated. Sacrifice and obligation are | what really binds people together and if we want to extend | the discussion a bit, I think modern marriage which has | shifted from being framed as something that's about duty | and family towards shared interest and chemistry is an | example of how frail this is as a basis for relationships | as well. | lapcat wrote: | The article author was basically asking "How can we make | new friends?" and mentions sailing, brunch, and borrowing | a neighbor's wifi. Whereas you're talking about... going | to war. It just feels like you're discussing something | quite a bit beyond the article. | | I had some close friends among schoolmates, but I | wouldn't characterize our relationship as "sacrifice and | obligation". What does that even mean to a 12 year old? | What does it mean to a college undergrad? I can | understand what it means in the military, but that's a | rather unique situation in life. | mrxd wrote: | I just don't find it plausible that only certain people are | capable of love, trust, loyalty, etc. and we should be looking | for those kinds of people. It seems more likely that this level | of investment is costly and people already have these kinds of | relationships. | | The argument seems tautological. A good friend is someone who | is loyal, trustworthy, etc., so look for these traits. But in | reality, everyone has these traits, they just reserve them for | a small number of high investment relationships. So the claim | is that to make good friends, look for someone who wants to be | your friend. Which isn't that helpful at the end of the day. | civilized wrote: | Shared context is necessary but I think shared perspectives and | values are what ultimately matter. I have shared context with a | lot of people at work but I'm only good friends with one or two. | | Very relatedly, my wife is my best friend, and I tend to become | friends with people who are like her. (ugh, Wife Guy) | jdkee wrote: | Proximity, unplanned interactions and privacy are three key | components or forming new friendships. | | See https://www.businessinsider.com/things-that-help-people- | make... | ghostly_s wrote: | Thanks, some actual evidence-based claims instead if this | pointless unsupported conjecture. | PKop wrote: | Made a comment about this on another thread [0]: | | "True friendship comes mostly from shared struggle. Think sports | teams, military, small teams at work, even childhood friends and | the experience growing up. | | It is hard to establish anything meaningful of a connection with | casual interactions, and expecting to just "party/play hard" with | people you don't really know is putting the cart before the | horse. First you must work hard together. | | I'd suggest joining a Crossfit gym or similar. I've had great | success meeting people within the context of group workouts. It | has regular class schedules, and provides a way to ease into | social interactions at your own pace as you'll be around the same | people regularly. Often this leads to opportunities to do things | together outside of the classes. | | Additionally, there are likely individuals with similar | disinterest in the common activities you mentioned in you CS | classes. Finding opportunities to work with someone on class | assignments, studying or projects together would fall in the | "shared struggle" category." | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28969047 | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-30 23:00 UTC)