[HN Gopher] The industry has been sizing kayak paddles wrong for... ___________________________________________________________________ The industry has been sizing kayak paddles wrong for years Author : troydavis Score : 45 points Date : 2022-05-30 11:23 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (paddlingmag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (paddlingmag.com) | neves wrote: | Would it impact Standup Paddlers? | TedShiller wrote: | > Shaft size matters. | | That's what she said | boznz wrote: | I wonder how many other "assumptions" out there are also fucked | up ? | ghaff wrote: | I'm a bit unsure about "the industry" here. It's probably true | that whitewater paddlers, as the article suggests, tend to go | with shorter paddles than are generally ideal for sea kayak | touring. Generally speaking, longer shaft paddles have been | available, but it may well be the case that a lot of people don't | go with them because it doesn't feel natural based on how they | learned to paddle. | | (I agree with the basic point that, for sea kayaking, you mostly | want to keep your hands fairly low and have a relatively long | paddle. There's also a whole discussion around blade shapes but | that's a topic for another day.) | | ADDED: I did do a fair amount of sea kayaking instruction at one | point and the inclination of a lot of students is definitely to | hold their hands high and dig in whether because of previous | whitewater kayaking, canoeing, fun-yaks, or other reasons. | palmetieri2000 wrote: | Hi mate! I'm super interested in this topic. | | Why is having a long paddle with fairly low hands beneficial | for sea kayaking? | | Do you have any resources you think are good quality that I | could find somewhere? | | Thanks! | japhyr wrote: | In sea kayaking you're usually going longer distances, so | being able to get into a steady efficient rhythm is | important. Quick maneuverability is important, but it's not | the highest priority. Wind also comes up a lot in sea | kayaking, and being able to keep your paddle low is helpful. | ghaff wrote: | I don't have any specific resources but it's really an energy | thing. When you paddle--and this is broadly true although | maybe more specific to sea kayak touring than other things-- | you're not primarily using your arms. You're essentially | keeping your hands in a fairly fixed location and rotating | your upper body to supply the needed force. (Though this | applies to canoeing as well.) | | Some of the classic books by the likes of Nigel Foster are | probably still applicable but I haven't looked at them in | years. | tormeh wrote: | What I don't get is why one oar is rotated 90 degrees off the | other one. It means whenever I use these double-sided paddles I | have to rotate them ever so slightly whenever I make a new | stroke. It's annoying and I don't understand why it's done. Does | anyone know? | stevesimmons wrote: | 90 degrees reduces the wind pushing the upper blade. Feathering | the blades to 60-80 reduces wrist strain (in novice paddlers, | who aren't used to the movement) but makes the top blade more | susceptible to catching the wind. | | And if you play canoe polo, you'll want it to be exactly 90 | degrees so the ball rebounds predictably when you block the | ball with the paddle. | deepsun wrote: | My instructor said 90 degrees is an old school. Nowadays people | do like 25 only. | Joky wrote: | The movement of paddling has a natural rotation of the shaft | when you raised the fixed hand for a stroke on the other side, | it's quite straightforward to figure out sitting and mimicing | the movement. | | During this movement if the blade aren't feathered at all you | have to compensate with some bending of the wrist. The amount | of rotation of the shaft induced depends on how much you raise | the hand/elbow, and so is fairly dependent on your style of | stroke. This is the main way I think should be approached | feathering: how much vertical do you intend to paddle? From | there the angle should follow to optimize for the least amount | of wrist twisting. | | In general paddling very vertical will come with more angle in | between the blades. I practice slalom and use to have 70-80 | degrees crossing, but I tend to paddle less vertically now | (aging? Lack of training?) and I'm down to 60 degrees | comfortably now. | lkschubert8 wrote: | Last I remember looking into it is the hard 90 degree offset is | for wind resistance in open water. | handmodel wrote: | This is why it's done but still sorta of strange to me that | this was the way I was taught by camp instructors - even | though we never were going for speed. Feels a bit like | learning how to ride a bike with one of those aerodynamic | helmets even if you aren't really ready to learn racing | technique yet. | | https://www.sportsperformancebulletin.com/wp- | content/uploads... | ghaff wrote: | It's not just racing. Feathering paddles can be really | useful generally if wind picks up and you're actively | fighting it. Otherwise you're dealing with a lot of | resistance with the paddle blade in the air. And I assume | there are instructors who just want to instill feathered | paddles as the norm you should expect. | | I generally disagree but lots of people with more | experience than I have don't. | ghaff wrote: | Yes. It's called feathering. | | In general, I prefer to unfeather my paddles. (Many good | paddles can be adjusted--modula small surface area Greenland | paddles.) But there's also an argument that you shouldn't | change your paddle orientation so that you can do bracing and | other manoeuvres by reflex. | stevesimmons wrote: | A slightly strange article, whose premise feels like a strawman. | | I've paddled a ton of whitewater, sprint, marathon, canoe polo, | touring and sea kayaking. | | The only time I ever cared about total length (rather than shaft | length) was when I was a canoe polo goalie, and wanted to balance | reaching the top corners of the goal (long) with fast | acceleration and turns (shorter). | smegsicle wrote: | someone posts one article on kayaking and the hn canoe polo | people just come out of the gd woodwork | edrxty wrote: | Funny enough, rowing, in all it's Olympic glory still isn't sure | what the optimal oar size or length is. There's some contention | over what the right surface area and geometry is with many higher | performance groups using older designs now as they feel the | current generation is oversized and with too short a shaft. | ghaff wrote: | Of course, the "right" answer for racing may not be the same as | for someone doing relatively recreational paddling. I assume | it's very situational--including for the individual involved. | edrxty wrote: | Recreational paddlers generally aren't going to notice a | difference at all. The issue is balancing losses from force | vectors, the blades pushing and pulling towards/away from | each other at the extremes of the stroke, and fluid dynamics | where the larger blade has higher flat plate drag and wastes | less energy as turbulence around the periphery. You can't | have both without making special (wider pin spread) rigging | for the boat which oddly hasn't been played around with | much..... | | Also of note, lightweight women through open weight men use | the same blade area and very similar spread/inboard/outboard | measurements. There hasn't been much interest in tailoring | the rigging to athletes due to equipment expense and | availability limitations, even at the Olympic level. | swayvil wrote: | I imagine many frustrating arguments. | | Truth is dictated by authority. That's just how our society | works. For like 10,000 years. Scientific enlightenment | notwithstanding. | | Like a network of solipsists. | | If the authority told us to cut off our nose we'd be a 90% | noseless population inside a week. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-31 23:00 UTC)