[HN Gopher] NetScape: A Sneak Preview of the shape of WWW Browse... ___________________________________________________________________ NetScape: A Sneak Preview of the shape of WWW Browsers to come (1994) Author : Lammy Score : 68 points Date : 2022-05-31 16:44 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (web.archive.org) (TXT) w3m dump (web.archive.org) | Lammy wrote: | Meta: the submitted title isn't visible in the article itself but | can be seen on the TOC of Urban Desires Vol 1 Issue 1: | https://web.archive.org/web/19961102083247/http://desires.co... | | e: whoops, I linked to the wrong thing. This is the link I | intended to submit: | https://web.archive.org/web/19961102091029/http://desires.co... | hising wrote: | Every time I read about NetScape I start to have nightmares about | stuff like | | document.layers[0].document.layers[0].document.layers[0].document | .write("Hello World") | | Came later on (Netscape 4 I think, but I still get shivers from | it) | hising wrote: | DynAPI helped out back then | | https://www.dansteinman.com/dynduo/index.html | grishka wrote: | > Maybe one day we'll all be connected through our nice fat cable | TV lines, but that's a long way off and most of us aren't going | to wait. | | And these days DOCSIS, the thing that runs over a coaxial TV | antenna cable, is on the low end of internet access technologies, | at least where I'm from. It's fun to see how times change. | kloch wrote: | It's pretty amazing that we all carry around a device in our | pocket with more wireless Internet bandwidth than anyone had | (in any media) in 1994. | sbf501 wrote: | I still use Motif Window Manager & X/Motif when writing native | linux apps because I miss those big blocky buttons. | bitwize wrote: | Ah, good old Netscape. With its hardcoded buttons going to | hardcoded URLs to give you a starting point for "surfing" the | World Wide Web. And the "throbber"... they could have put up the | system's hourglass cursor, but they used the throbber animation | to signal to the user that the network, not the machine itself, | was busy. UIs had a much clearer vocabulary back then, the money | was in the user having situational awareness and making informed | decisions about what to do, not in blind "engagement". | blihp wrote: | The money was in blind banner ads back then. (to the extent | there was serious money in ads back then... I don't recall the | flood of banner ads until 95/96 or so) | pupppet wrote: | I still love that throbber animation, when I see it I remember | how navigating to a new page was a fun, almost mysterious | little adventure. | coldpie wrote: | Many a minute spent watching those comets drift by... | https://i.stack.imgur.com/oqMri.gif | kloch wrote: | comets and supernova | unhammer wrote: | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search/?q=throbber&... | aww, was hoping for a nostalgic addon to bring it back | jd3 wrote: | I wrote a userChrome.css which repurposes the hamburger | button w/ the jwz throbber. | | There are no browser chrome class changes when a tab is | loading in modern ff, so it sadly doesn't animate on load, | but it does animate when you hover over it! | | https://imgur.com/a/xSoDYai | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30820894#30823413 | postalrat wrote: | "Graphical User Interface, or "gooey" in nerdspeak" | | Now it's almost reversed. "Graphical User Interface" is the | nerdspeak. | pmoriarty wrote: | One thing from that era that the web hasn't fully jettisoned is | the completely unnecessary and redundant use of the www domain | name prefix for web servers. | | I expect it'll still be there in the year 2525. | bawolff wrote: | At the time it probably was more neccesary. Http wasn't the | only game in town. | | But don't underestimate the value of branding either. | rollcat wrote: | It's not completely redundant. You can't make a naked CNAME | record (technically you can, but things will break in | mysterious ways), and there's no standardised means of | dynamically updating an A/AAAA record e.g. to match a | virtualised load balancer (e.g. AWS ELB). Vendors have non- | standard extensions to work around this, e.g. Route53 has the | ALIAS virtual type (which presents itself as an A/AAAA to the | clients); I wrote some cron+dig hacks in the past when that | wasn't available (e.g. with ChinaCache). | 0des wrote: | also reminds me of folks who went with web.* instead of www.* a | while back when we thought thats how things would go. still | cant remember the full reason behind it. | tpmx wrote: | _... the most significant is the way it allows the user to go on | browsing while it downloads items not immediately needed in the | background. Rather than forcing you to wait for a graphic to | load, Netscape, loads a page 's text first, allowing you to | scroll down the page or jump ahead to another URL while that nice | looking, but perhaps not immediately necessary graphic, loads a | piece at a time and without the need to wait for the page to | paginate._ | | _This "continuous document streaming," combined with Netscape's | ability to download several documents or images at the same time | has the effect of dramatically reducing time devoted to waiting, | and increasing the time spent exploring the Internet's | bewilderingly diverse content. Coupled with an overall | performance increase optimized for 14,400 kbs [sic] modems, this | makes Netscape, by far the speediest Web browser currently | available._ | pavlov wrote: | Kids These Days have no idea how important this was. Loading a | 100kB JPEG over a 14.4K dial-up connection took about a minute. | | As the image crawled into view, you'd hope the top slice of the | image would reveal whether it's worth waiting for or if you | should move on. Progressive JPEG was invented to solve this | frustration, but it wasn't always a great improvement when you | were staring at a blobby first-pass rendering of the image | trying to guess what it might be. | pmontra wrote: | Yep, that was what made everybody at my company immediately | switch to Netscape. "Look, a browser that doesn't stop. You | can read the page before images load!" And click to the next | one. | tpmx wrote: | Do you know/remember if the NCSA Mosaic 0.x/1.x (pre- | Netscape) rendering/browsing process was non-async/blocking | on X/Unix as well, and not just on Windows 3.x? | pmontra wrote: | It was blocking on all platforms. I was using a DEC Alpha | and a Sun (some pizza box) to code and a Windows PC for | Word and Mail. I think I didn't bother much with browsing | on Windows. Too unstable and underpowered back then but | it changed quickly. The Moore Law was strong at Intel in | the 90s. | loloquwowndueo wrote: | Would still be good to have for when a "web designer" saves a | full-Res 5k-px on their Mac and then scales it using css | width/height. Painful to watch the image slowly load on a | less-than-50Mbps link. | hinkley wrote: | The big difference between Netscape and NCSA Mosaic is that | NCSA Mosaic demanded WIN32 in order to function, which was | (partially) available as an extension to Windows 3.11 in the | form of Win32s, which included support for 32 bit binaries | and threading. | | Netscape implemented cooperative multitasking instead. While | more error-prone, it did have one distinct advantage: | Netscape fit on a 1.44MB floppy. Mosaic also fit on a 1.44MB | floppy. However! If you were new to the Web, you would not | have downloaded the WIN32 extensions yet. Which meant that | practically, if you got Mosaic on a floppy, you needed twice | as many floppies, and NCSA needed redistribution rights for | Win32s. The world was just damned lucky those disks never got | infected with a virus. | tpmx wrote: | I guess that was added in later versions of NCSA Mosaic for | Windows, perhaps to match the "asyncness" of Netscape 1.0? | | https://winworldpc.com/product/ncsa-mosaic/1 has a 720k | disk image of Mosaic 1.0 for Windows. INSTALL.TXT mentions | needing Winsock 1.1, but it doesn't mention Win32s. | | The timestamps of the files in the disk image are from Nov | 10-11, 1993. | hinkley wrote: | That did not last long. | | November 1993, Mosaic for Windows was brand spanking new. | | https://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-033/USGS_3D/software/pcwind | ow/... https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www- | talk/1995JulAug/002... but it was on Win32 by Summer of | 1994, when it was also supported on DEC Alpha, MIPS, and | PPC versions of Windows NT. | [deleted] | chrisjc wrote: | Somewhat related, but I listened to recent episode of the | acquired podcast where they were interviewing Brendan Eich and | there were some pretty interesting moments discussing the state | of Mozilla/Firefox over the years. | | They even brought up XUL which I was extremely excited about at | the time. | | On a side note, as a dedicated Firefox user it was very | disheartening to hear that as one of the crucial people involved | in Mozilla over the years he decided against using a Firefox | derivative for his new browser, instead choosing a chromium-based | one instead. | | https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/the-browser-with-brendan-ei... | pmoriarty wrote: | When Firefox ditched XUL it lost one of its most useful | extensions: Pentadactyl | tiffanyh wrote: | > "They even brought up XUL which I was extremely excited about | at the time." | | Don't forget XAML. | | I too was excited for these two things as well ~20 years ago. | chrisjc wrote: | There is no data. There is only XUL! | superkuh wrote: | XUL still rules in Sea Monkey Classic and Pale Moon. | 0des wrote: | Interesting episode. I wonder why they seem to have removed it | from their episode feed.. https://pod.link/acquiredlp | gurumeditations wrote: | It was very disheartening to hear that Brendan Eich is a | homophobic piece of garbage who hates gay people so much that | he donated thousands of dollars of his own money over multiple | years to take what little rights gay people had gained away | from us. Homophobia kills. Straight people like Brendan Eich | are why gay kids kill themselves. Straight people are still | happy to work with him though! | paulryanrogers wrote: | He wasn't as bad as some, and it was common to oppose | homosexual marriage in 2008. Still sad that he didn't back | down even when the tide turned. | | As leader of a supposedly community driven project and corp | one would hope he'd reconsider the rights of marginalized | groups. | rascul wrote: | > On a side note, as a dedicated Firefox user it was very | disheartening to hear that as one of the crucial people | involved in Mozilla over the years he decided against using a | Firefox derivative for his new browser, instead choosing a | chromium-based one instead. | | I felt the same, and I may have done more than simply dismiss | Brave if that were the case. Although I do understand that | Gecko isn't exactly simple or easy for a third party to build | off of. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-31 23:00 UTC)