[HN Gopher] OVHcloud fire class action reaches 140 clients, seek...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       OVHcloud fire class action reaches 140 clients, seeks more than
       EUR10m
        
       Author : giuliomagnifico
       Score  : 44 points
       Date   : 2022-06-03 19:10 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.datacenterdynamics.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.datacenterdynamics.com)
        
       | sofixa wrote:
       | I'm not sure the lawsuit has much merit. OVH's datacenter designs
       | are custom, widely described by themselves, and on their terms.
       | You sign up for their services based on what they provide, they
       | didn't promise much, and when their SLA was broken they paid up.
       | 
       | That's how they remain so low cost, they skimp on everything they
       | can, like Ryanair.
       | 
       | If i can draw an analogy, it'd be like buying food from a food
       | truck selling very cheap seafood, which follows all relevant
       | regulations, but has a booklet describing how that seafood takes
       | a week to get to them, and you get sick. Yes, they should do
       | their job better, but nobody can act surprised.
        
         | tyingq wrote:
         | _" OVHcloud fire report: SBG2 data center had wooden ceilings,
         | no extinguisher, and no power cut-out"_[1]
         | 
         | I suspect that opens up negligence, which may route you around
         | legal barriers like SLAs and TOS, depending on the laws where
         | this lawsuit is happening. And of course, you don't have to win
         | in court to win. You can just be enough of a cost, nuisance, or
         | PR problem to get a settlement.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/ovhcloud-fire-
         | rep...
        
         | usr1106 wrote:
         | Except that most countries have public (state and/or local)
         | surveillance of food safety and those not complying will be
         | fined or can be closed. With reliability of IT services such
         | thing probably doesn't exist in any country. Only when it comes
         | cybersecurity they could be fined for violating GDPR. But I
         | don't think they leaked anything, they just lost it.
        
           | sofixa wrote:
           | That's why i said, they followed all relevant regulations (
           | which for datacenters basically stop at fire safety). Their
           | implementation was really bad, but compliant.
        
             | yakak wrote:
             | It will be interesting to see. If for example there were
             | somewhat relevant fire or electrical regulations that
             | weren't properly enforced by local government, I guess the
             | owner or builder is still the only one liable?
        
         | bayindirh wrote:
         | I'm not sure that OVH is meeting all criteria for a safe
         | building containing a lot of wood for any use, let alone for
         | data center use.
         | 
         | Let's see what will come out of this.
        
         | tinus_hn wrote:
         | You can't run a food truck and not guarantee your food doesn't
         | make people sick, that's not even allowed in the Land of the
         | Free.
        
         | 908B64B197 wrote:
         | > That's how they remain so low cost, they skimp on everything
         | they can, like Ryanair.
         | 
         | That's also why you go with a real cloud as soon as you raise
         | enough funding.
        
           | Nextgrid wrote:
           | If a fire happens every 20 years then I'll take my chances.
           | It's not like the "real clouds" don't go down either.
        
           | capableweb wrote:
           | Unless you want to be cost-effective and have the expertise,
           | then bare-metal is the way to go. As things seem right now,
           | companies are gonna get a lot better at being cost-effective
           | and cloud services are not.
        
             | bayindirh wrote:
             | I don't whether you're also including "build your own data
             | center" inside bare-metal, but a data center has many
             | moving parts. Keeping servers up and running is the easiest
             | of all.
        
           | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
           | Or have a good DR strategy/a second cheap cloud provider
           | ready, potentially giving you more reliability than a single
           | expensive one (see e.g.
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17431609 and the horror
           | stories posted in the comments there).
           | 
           | Harder if you're heavily relying on the more advanced
           | services with often provider-specific APIs, but I think if
           | you host with OVH you're likely to be primarily renting
           | machines.
        
         | wmf wrote:
         | Did they really document that there's no isolation between SBG1
         | and SBG2?
        
       | spaniard89277 wrote:
       | I wonder how cheap a VPS provider can go. In Spain none of the
       | companies can match OVH, but datacenters in Spain are pretty old
       | regular ones, even the small ones like NixVal.
        
         | spiffytech wrote:
         | https://lowendbox.com/ is the go-to place for finding the most
         | shoestring VPS available, and they can come very cheap, either
         | in absolute dollars or in compute-per-dollar.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-03 23:00 UTC)