[HN Gopher] Arduino raises $32M Series B round ___________________________________________________________________ Arduino raises $32M Series B round Author : marc__1 Score : 159 points Date : 2022-06-10 17:35 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (blog.arduino.cc) (TXT) w3m dump (blog.arduino.cc) | duskwuff wrote: | Hot take: I don't see this working out. | | Arduino's approach has historically been to sell breakout boards | for commodity microcontrollers. They do not have any history of | success in any of the fields they're proposing to enter, and | particularly not in IoT services or AI. | | Arduino has made approaches to industry before, e.g. with the | Portenta series of boards. They have generally been unsuccessful, | in large part because their approach to industry has generally | been "look, we're using industrial temperature range ICs" -- | hardly a compelling offering. | fest wrote: | Me neither. In industry, Arduino is almost an expletive- mostly | associated with projects where someone is trying to use the | hardware in a way that's not actually fulfilling an | underspecified set of requirements, or where someone has | stepped on one of many foot-guns in it's software ecosystem. | | An example for the first group: trying to save a couple hundred | USD/EUR and using it where a PLC would be universally better | choice (IO protection, EMC assurances, maintenance). | | Examples of the second group: delay functions disabling | interrupts leading to missed serial data, (L)GPL'd library | code, lack of debugging support (until recently), any sleep | mode support. | | Don't get me wrong- there is a lot of good stuff in there- some | of the libraries and projects built around it are really useful | but effective use of them requires deeper knowledge than | getting an intern "just doing it on an Arduino". | alar44 wrote: | I was offered a controls gig to design a very complicated | machine that was to be used by consumers in shopping malls. | Many moving parts. Many pinch zones, safety concerns etc. All | in all probably 100 drives and maybe double as many sensors. | They were hell bent on using an Arduino to "save money". I | ran as fast as I could. | the_biot wrote: | It's not obvious to work out what exactly the plan is, as the | press release has a fairly thick coat of corporate speak on it. | | However I assume they'll want to take a chunk out of the | Raspberry Pi market -- whose hardware always was shit, but | whose execution has lately been terrible as well, what with the | years-long scarcity of boards. | | The Pi's secret to its success is arguably its community | support, and I think only Arduino can match that. | Iv wrote: | If only that could make them support a bit more their | surprisingly cheap and good robot arm, the Braccio! | cercatrova wrote: | How will Arduino make multiples off $32MM? That's always the | question I have for VC-raising startups. | aresant wrote: | It is hard to think of a more transformative piece of hardware | for hackers than Arduino | | I have observed hobbyists innovating in really cool ways in all | sorts of corners - musicians, athletes, retro computer | collectors, etc | | Very glad to see they're being well funded and can continue | building | | PS - I elect this as the greatest current Arduino contribution to | humanity - The Furby Organ - | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYLBjScgb7o | jandrese wrote: | It's really impressive for a technology that started out as a | student project to bring cheaper microcontrollers to younger | students. | ignoramous wrote: | A student project where the student was booted out, no less: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11212021 | kurupt213 wrote: | Another circle of hell missed by Dante | glouwbug wrote: | Now we need the FPGA equivalent. The FPGA industry is still | very much stuck in what was the pre-GNU era of software | IshKebab wrote: | I dunno, Vivaldi is quite good. Or did you mean open source? | In which case I 100% agree. Still full of tools that are only | usable by masochists and the people that wrote them. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | > Vivaldi is quite good | | You mean Vivado? | IshKebab wrote: | Err yes oops! | sbierwagen wrote: | https://store-usa.arduino.cc/products/arduino-mkr- | vidor-4000... | flaviut wrote: | The magical part of Arduino isn't hardware with the Arduino | branding, but a great set of open source core libraries & a | easy to use toolchain. | | This hardware unfortunately doesn't have either of that; it | requires Intel Quartus for design and synthesis. | kanwisher wrote: | Look at MisterFPGA they are doing a lot of cool stuff to make | fpga a bit more mainstream with emulating game consoles, | https://www.retrorgb.com/mister.html | wiml wrote: | There are! I've used the fomu and the tinyfpga, both with the | open source stack. | | (In the past I've tried running the commercial products under | WINE, like most people did at the time, and it worked but was | definitely terrible.) | [deleted] | armatav wrote: | Yes - someone make something for macOS/linux that's actually | usable | back7co wrote: | It started with Arduino for me, which led me to Adafruit, who | has gone on to make their own Open Source Hardware and the | Circuit Python platform. The scene now is multi-vendor and very | healthy, but I'll admit I stopped using Arduino when it was | very hard to get a genuine one... which I think is a solved | problem by buying direct now. | suyash wrote: | Adafruit has done to Arduino what Arduino did to Wiring. | Adafruit is pushing it's own custom python called 'Circuit | Python' for it's new hardware so there is no Arduino code | examples to go with thier products anymore which is a big | disaster. | | We should stick to standard Arduino code that should run on | all compatible Arduino devices. | OnionBlender wrote: | I lost respect for Adafruit after their data leak and they | announced they would not be emailing their customers to | notify them about the data leak. Although they later | changed their mind after people criticised their decision. | | https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/adafruit- | disc... | bri3d wrote: | > We should stick to standard Arduino code that should run | on all compatible Arduino devices. | | Why should the entire hobbyist hardware space be an Arduino | monoculture? | | IMO the Arduino proto-language and framework are quite | mediocre and it's time to move on. For beginners, embedded | hardware has gotten much more powerful and more familiar | languages can be employed. For more advanced users and | larger projects, using a real RTOS with a real task system | unlocks development velocity in a huge way. | | I don't really love CircuitPython, but I don't see how this | is comparable to the Wiring/Arduino situation, nor do I | really see it as a step backwards. | nerfhammer wrote: | quasi-python is a lot easier for beginners than quasi-C imo | skybrian wrote: | Switching to PlatformIO is a nice way to go if you want a | more sane version of Arduino package management. | sokoloff wrote: | Adafruit appears to still be supporting the Arduino IDE and | ecosystem with their new boards. | | https://blog.adafruit.com/2022/04/20/new-guide-adafruit- | esp3... "Circuit Playground Express is the newest and best | Circuit Playground board, with support for CircuitPython, | MakeCode, and Arduino." | NonNefarious wrote: | I have an Uno, but I've moved away from Arduino because an | Uno costs as much as a Raspberry Pi. Granted, they serve | different purposes, but now there's the Pi Pico for $5. | | Nothing against the Arduino folks; they really opened up a | great avenue for exploration. But it doesn't seem cost- | competitive at the moment. | martin_a wrote: | Have a look to Arduino "inspired" other boards, then. The | ESP8266 comes to mind which brings onboard WIFI for around | $5 or less and is probably a great start into anything IOT- | like. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | Remember that Arduino is OSHW so clones & alternate | implementations are everywhere at far lower cost. You're | better off starting with a Black Pill or ESP32 based unit | these days anyway. The overall ecosystem and common framework | is far more valuable than any individual piece of hardware. | baybal2 wrote: | Arduino is to commercial embedded development as what Javascript | is to Java. | | I had the first Arduino model with a COM port bought to me by my | late mother to spike my interest into computer stuff when I was | in high school. | | I grew a bit over confident with what I can do, when on my first | job I went on to fix an MP3 player firmware so it don't crash | from Russian in ID3 tags. | | I told the boss the fix is trivial, then it took me 3 month to | find out that whatever you knew of garden variety C++ is not | working in the world of hardcore C, and that hardware needs | control down to clock cycles, registers, and assembly | instructions. It was a sink, or swim experience. | inamberclad wrote: | Arduino positively transformed me. I thought code was cool, but | then getting an Arduino and being able to blink an LED from | software, control a motor, move dials and buttons... it's | amazingly empowering. | beckingz wrote: | This won't end well. Time to double down on the ESPs. | rasz wrote: | Which one? Because there was a huge drama with two incorported | Arduinos, one by a guy who has nothing to do with a project other | than running a PCB house making boards for them and then silently | filing trademarks all over Europe and suing original project. | 2xpress wrote: | I bet in a little bit they'll do yet another press release | regarding how "excited" they are to sell themselves to Microsoft | or Oracle or something similar to "transform" "enhance" | "integrate" and "optimize" "enterprise cloud services" with "new | AI capabilities" or similar. | qorrect wrote: | "Whether you're a Gen Z or a Millennial engineer..." | | Seriously ? | contingencies wrote: | _Any piece of engineering design is a statement. By the | designer without the user._ - Michael Sean Mahoney | | ... via https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup | duxup wrote: | I wonder, how many people really identify with their "gen name" | type name? | | Maybe folks do and it's just me that finds that weird. | Clubber wrote: | >I wonder, how many people really identify with their "gen | name" type name? | | It about as useful as their astrological sign. | brink wrote: | "How do you do, fellow kids?" | martingoodson wrote: | It's essential to read Hernando Barragan's perspective. His ideas | and work were stolen and turned into Arduino: | | http://arduinohistory.github.io/ | TheMagicHorsey wrote: | Is this the original team or the venture by the guy who bought | the rights to the name? Wasn't there some controversy about the | original developers and team being pushed out? Maybe someone else | remembers the whole story? | rvense wrote: | There was a rift between the founders that led to a new company | being formed, but it has been resolved and the companies have | merged. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | Yeah, but nobody cares. We're too busy building stuff :-) | duxup wrote: | I didn't even realize Arduino was a VC venture. | | For some reason I was under the impression they were a non-profit | or some corporate supported education related thing. | | Outside of selling a few boards that can be hard to get a hold of | how do they make all this money back? Just about as soon as I | started playing with one Arduino I found other third party | hardware better suited my needs. I don't really see any reason to | use Arduino's hardware over anyone else's compatible hardware | .... | qbasic_forever wrote: | They took investment from ARM a few years ago, they didn't | start out as a VC funded company IIRC: | https://hackaday.com/2017/10/05/who-owns-arduino/ | fartcannon wrote: | Did the intellectual property stuff ever get ironed out? | https://lwn.net/Articles/637755/ | | arduino.org redirects to arduino.cc so maybe? | shakna wrote: | Yes. In 2017, BMCI acquired all of the Arduino trademarks. [0] | | [0] https://techwombat.com/bcmi-acquires-arduino-ag-makers- | breat... | bmitc wrote: | I feel terrible for Hernando Barragan who invented Wiring, only | for it essentially to be stolen by his advisor Massimo Banzi and | renamed Arduino, leaving out the inventor. Given that Banzi and | the Arduino team never referred any credit to Wiring, I can only | assume it was due to ego reasons since they credited Banzi's | previous project as the source of Arduino. | | https://arduinohistory.github.io/ | | Then the Arduino team had their own further battle about rights. | The Arduino folks don't seem to be the most honest of folks. I | have always avoided Arduino due to this history. | moralestapia wrote: | This kind of intellectual theft is extremely common in | academia, particularly between <an immigrant from a different | country> vs. <someone who is a national wherever this happens>. | | Recommended movie, Dark Matter [1]. | | 1: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0416675/ | anaclet0 wrote: | Source? | mannanj wrote: | Ah this is sad, and makes me too want to avoid arduino. Wonder | if those below would consider similar if they knew. | sieabah wrote: | It's open source, you can't really steal open source software | unless it was never "free and open source" to begin with. | jazzyjackson wrote: | You can still be a jerk by making millions of dollars | without crediting the work of _your own grad student_ | bmitc wrote: | Should we abide our lives by what lawyers say is right or | wrong? | iosjunkie wrote: | Assuming what lawyers say is a reflection of what the | governing law states or allows for, yes? | | Want to reign in the lawyers? Start with your | governments. | gregsadetsky wrote: | I think that it's fair to consider Arduino's complicated | history (the legal battles, the Wiring history, etc.) while | also acknowledging how revolutionary it's been to hobbyist | electronics. | | I'm not sure what would be improved by trying to avoid | Arduino at this point. Especially considering that it has | spawned a very large and versatile ecosystem: all of the open | source libraries that have been created for it (some random | amazing ones: [0], [1]), the compatible shields and | accessories [2], tutorials & courses, etc. | | It remains an extremely important and useful platform, and | for good reason. | | [0] https://github.com/Avamander/arduino-tvout | | [1] https://github.com/sensorium/Mozzi | | [2] https://www.adafruit.com/category/21 | pilgrimfff wrote: | And suddenly that twinge of guilt I felt when buying knockoff | Arduino boards is... gone. | suyash wrote: | Thanks, did not know about this shady history. | nickpinkston wrote: | While it's regrettable if Massimo broke his trust, this is open | source software/hardware, and its ethos is about sharing and | forking the designs, so you can't really "steal" it. Also for | context, Wiring was a further development of the open source | Processing language, and Hernando is no more a "thief" for | doing that. | | Also, the first inventor is only one part of any product, and | it's hard to argue that Massimo did wrong to the community by | popularizing Arduino, and people still know what Wiring is. | bmitc wrote: | The point is that there was no reason not to just contribute | to Wiring and take it from there. The nefarious thing is that | they took the project and rewrote its history to make it seem | as if it was their own work, meanwhile still taking new | Wiring development and incorporating it into Arduino, all | without credit. So it was about control and ego. I would | assume that even some open source licenses were broken. | | Also, Banzi wrote this: | | https://blog.arduino.cc/2013/07/10/send-in-the-clones/ | | lamenting this exact thing when it came to people doing it to | Arduino. | palmetieri2000 wrote: | Great link! Thanks. | | Slightly off topic but in Banzi's article (subheading | Counterfeits) he mentions the now well known problem of | Amazon cohousing different manufacturers products and then | effectively sending a random one to the client. I think | this is interesting as it still seems to be a problem | nearly a decade later. | gspr wrote: | Something being open source typically doesn't mean you can | copy and use it without attribution. | _jal wrote: | I would say proper attribution and credit is even more | important in open source development than elsewhere. | | My day job takes credit for my work, but compensates me in | money. Pretty much the only "pay" for the vast majority of | open source work is credit. | | > it's hard to argue that Massimo did wrong to the community | by popularizing Arduino | | So who made that argument? I haven't seen anyone claim his | marketing efforts were unethical. | | But let's say you wrote a significant part of a book. I took | your work, completed it, and published it as solely my work. | It becomes wildly successful. Have I done anything wrong? | tpmx wrote: | I have zero qualms about buying cheap Arduino clone boards | because of this. | | Although lately I've found myself requiring basic IP/wi-fi for | almost every usecase, so I've turned to ESP8266/ESP32 boards | instead of AVR boards. | | Here's hoping for a low-cost wi-fi-enabled Raspberry Pi Pico. I | wonder what the wi-fi IP licensing cost is like for companies | that actually need to pay attention to things like that. | alar44 wrote: | Well yeah I mean "Arduino" is just a couple #defines to make | a sort of custom C++ version. After a couple months playing | with it, most people shouldn't need anything Arduino anymore. | farisjarrah wrote: | There are RP2040 based boards with wifi are starting to come | out. While they aren't horrendously expensive, they are | double or triple the cost of a regular base raspberry pi pico | model. | | Here is one I have seen, but I haven't used or played with | it. | | https://thepihut.com/products/challenger-rp2040-wifi-chip- | an... | tpmx wrote: | "The WiFi section on this board is based on the Espressif | ESP8285 chip which basically is an ESP8266 with 1MByte | FLASH memory integrated onto the chip". | | I suppose I'm wishing for an Espressif-like approach. A | (low-power?) RPxxxx core fully assigned to running a Wi-Fi | software stack, in the same RPxxxx chip, along with having | the analogue RF aspects handled by the same chip/package. | duxup wrote: | I've found ESP8266 boards really suit my needs more than a | "full" Arduino boards, just a few wires and some built in wi- | fi is all I want for the most part so far with how I've been | using / playing them. | tgarv wrote: | I completely agree, with the exception of wanting easy | support for powering from a lipo battery and also charging | that battery without disconnecting it. This has led me to | use the Adafruit Feather RP2040 lately because it has a | builtin lipo charger and will automatically switch between | USB and battery power as needed, but of course it doesn't | work for projects that need WiFi. I'm hoping that we'll get | a board that easily combines the two soon. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-10 23:00 UTC)