[HN Gopher] A British garden's rainfall data 1988-2022 using cop... ___________________________________________________________________ A British garden's rainfall data 1988-2022 using copper rain gauge, notepad, pen Author : DoreenMichele Score : 129 points Date : 2022-06-11 09:27 UTC (13 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.weatherbook.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.weatherbook.org) | eterevsky wrote: | foobarbecue wrote: | In some places. In others, drought. A very complicated system | but I think you're right that there's a net increase in | precipitation expected overall globally. | eterevsky wrote: | Yes. That's true for the temperature as well. In most place | the average temperature is growing, but some places are | actually becoming colder. | fertrevino wrote: | I do not see that much of an upward trend, how did you notice | it? | eterevsky wrote: | Here you go: https://imgur.com/a/fbt68er. I've removed the | first and last year since they had incomplete data and did a | simple linear regression. These are yearly totals from | https://www.weatherbook.org/dash/3/totals | s1artibartfast wrote: | Undersampled Linear regressions are pretty sensitive to | noise points on the ends. Looks like the 90s were lower | than next 20 years. | easytiger wrote: | They had "confirmation bias" affecting their perception | eterevsky wrote: | Confirmation of what? The belief that climate change is | real? | | I posted a linear regression in a neighbor comment. | mytailorisrich wrote: | Yes, the UK is becoming wetter and the trend is expected to | continue. | easytiger wrote: | Based on what? The inverse is true in my part of the UK. | mytailorisrich wrote: | Based on stats and forecasts. | | " _the UK has been on average 6% wetter over the last 30 | years (1991-2020) than the preceding 30 years (1961-1990). | Six of the ten wettest years for the UK in a series from | 1862 have occurred since 1998._ " [1] | | [1] https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/press- | office/news/weat.... | gorgoiler wrote: | I have a standard rain gauge. It always bothers me that I don't | have two. Then I'd be able to measure my cumulative error | properly. | | Meteorologists, as I learned the other day, were some of the | early pioneers of a universal metric system. | dna_polymerase wrote: | Are they back to pen after going the classic Excel -> Evernote -> | Notion -> Roam route or has it been pen & paper all the time? /s | mseepgood wrote: | What's the point in doing this? Don't environmental authorities | and weather services record this already? | dylan604 wrote: | What's the point of reading HN, isn't there reddit already? | ianai wrote: | This started in 1988, too. Data was way more obscure in those | days. Probably not really available like now until the 2010s. | swayvil wrote: | I've got a yardstick from 1988. You need a PhD to read it. | It's barely euclidean. | ellisv wrote: | Weather is hyper local. In the US precipitation data are | generally available at 1km grid resolution through combination | of radar, satellite, and ground truth gauges -- these are good | areal estimates but pretty much always very bad point | estimates. There can be problems in data availability, and | quality due to all sorts of things like bird migrations, | clouds, and gauge malfunctions. Collecting your own data is | cheap and easy. | colechristensen wrote: | As farmers, my family has always been interested in the | weather for good reason. We have a few rain gauges about a | mile apart and the difference between them is significant. | You might get a tenth of an inch in one place and a half an | inch a mile away. | | The synthetic precipitation data might be useful on a large, | average scale, but it usually doesn't actually provide a | particularly accurate measure of what actually happened on | your land. | ianai wrote: | Gardening. You can look up stuff for an area, but you might | have plants locally with specific needs. Or people with rain | catchments. | | Our local monsoon season was weeks of great thunderstorms | twenty years ago and is now a period of humidity. Stuff like | this makes it "real." Aka resistant to gaslighting. | swayvil wrote: | I think these people are missing the broader implication. | ianai wrote: | Being? | swayvil wrote: | Taking a look for yourself is king. | easytiger wrote: | I used to help record weather measurements from a "weather | station" in the UK growing up. It's a cultural thing. Lots of | cultures _don 't_ have the same long term cooperative | investments. Their lack of toil evident by their negative | impact on society | huhtenberg wrote: | The "backstory" was on the Reddit post - the data came from | OP's father who was recording daily rainfall just because, | probably as an odd-ball hobby or a routine. The OP merely | packaged it up in a form of a website. | | https://www.reddit.com/user/saulhudson80 | dubcanada wrote: | What is the point in doing anything? Why cook, isn't there | already cooks that do that? Why program? Isn't there already | programmers who program? Why do woodworking? Walmart sells | chairs and other wood products? Why do pottery? I can go to | Etsy and buy it? Why own a fish tank? There is an ocean with | plenty of fish in it? Why garden? There are huge farms that do | that? | | What a silly question. | gorgoiler wrote: | I do it mainly because it is a tradition of the scientific | gentry to take measurements and build almanacs. Think Reed's | (nautical) or Wisden (cricket) but on a much more local scale. | It's probably why the article references the fact that their | gauge is made of copper -- taking pride in a sense of tradition | and solidity by using a brassy looking scientific instrument | made of metal. My own gauge is plastic but I mounted it on a | solid oak stave. We try to follow in the footsteps of Kelvin, | hiking to his waterfall with a hardwood case of glass | thermometers etc. | | I would probably be into steampunk as an aesthetic if it were | more hard scifi and less makebelieve. Compared to steampunk | bric-a-brac, a copper rain gauge is steam punk science that is | actually scientific, as opposed to an iPhone case with brass | cogs glued to it. | | It serves a practical purpose too -- when you have a privet | hedge and a lawn to care for and your climate provides rainfall | on an intermittent basis, it's important to know when the soil | needs some artificial millimetres on it to keep the foliage | going. | Nitramp wrote: | There was some debate three years ago on whether insect | populations were declining, with the prime suspect being modern | pesticides. | | The most solid data source they found in Germany was a local | club of enthusiast entomologists who had been collecting bugs | using the same traps, locations, and methodology over the past | 80+ years. | | The answer btw was yes, there was a marked reduction over that | time frame. | swayvil wrote: | Maybe it's an epistemological issue. Firshand perception is | realer than secondhand abstraction. | | Or maybe he just doesn't trust the government. | bbarnett wrote: | Rainfall is very, very site specific. So is temperature. | | If I drive 1km down the road, the temp goes up 3C in the | summer, when it is 35C in the city, and 32C here. | | Why? I am close to a river, there are hills around me. | Terrain makes a difference. | | Sometimes, I can see it rain an few km away, but not here. | And the reverse is true, too. | | And beyond that, rain is not consistent. It's not as of | someone turned on a faucet, and rain is coming from a perfect | shower head, all perfectly distributed. | | It varies, fluctuates, terrain, makes a difference, for | terrain effects wind patterns, causes air to rise or fall, | etc etc. | ianai wrote: | There's a lot to be said for having less concrete and | asphalt around. | [deleted] | some-human wrote: | This applies especially in the UK, where it can be pouring | with rain for an hour where I live, but beautiful sunshine | 2 miles away where my brother lives. The country is an | island with hills everywhere and a flat east coast. The Met | office data doesn't really have the resolution wanted for | some people. | | The adage if you don't like the weather in the UK, wait 5 | minutes, is also perfectly accurate. | KineticLensman wrote: | Yes. I live on the South Coast and notice temperature | changes from driving just a few mile inlands (e.g. in | winter, the difference between car windscreens icing up | or not). | | > The adage if you don't like the weather in the UK, wait | 5 minutes, is also perfectly accurate. | | I know what you mean, but three or four hours will almost | certainly guarantee a change (especially when raining) as | this gives westerly fronts from the Atlantic to pass | through. | swayvil wrote: | We get strange predictions and dissonance regularly where I | live. We barely trust the forecast anymore. | t78236787878789 wrote: | wiz21c wrote: | They do but sometimes the data are behind walls... | hestefisk wrote: | A.k.a. IoH - Internet of Humans | Yuioup wrote: | Started gardening 5 years ago. Before that I never realized how | messed up the climate was. Long period of drought mixed with | intetmittent torrents. Last year was also a disaster year due to | unusual temperature fluctuations. | lettergram wrote: | "Naturally occurring fluctuations" != "messed up climate" | | There's a reason prior to irrigation (and Hunter gathering) | only a few regions in the world supported long-term human | habitation. | LoveGracePeace wrote: | The Earth, who knew. Family moves from temperate climate to | the desert, wonders why it's always so hot, must be climate | change. The seas are rising, man checks web cams for sea side | resorts around the world and photos from the past several | decades, no change in sea levels, doesn't fit the narrative, | must be wrong. | ChrisClark wrote: | I am completely baffled why we still have global warming | deniers like this guy here. Just completely convinced by | propaganda? | grogenaut wrote: | his statement isnt denying climate change, its just | saying short term freaky weather happens. And people | often use short term weather within statistical bounds as | evidence of climate change when it is mor of a long term | thing that is statistical to measure. | | Read his statement with the missing nod to consensus | "while climate change is real" at the beginning. | hammock wrote: | What does it mean when dialogue can't be had without | first incensing the air with the quasi-religious rites of | "jabs are safe and effective," "climate change is real | and manmade," "there is no evidence of widespread voter | fraud," "peace be upon him" etc? | whythre wrote: | It does seem to be a weirdly ritualistic way of quickly | signifying that 'I am on your team, I am not one of the | crazy ones; however, I would still like to talk about | [touchy subject] without you making baseless | assumptions.' | bscphil wrote: | Your speculative explanation is incorrect, as is clear | from this user's other comments: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30450710 | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31559512 | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31559404 | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31559481 | | This appears to be a bugbear for them. | bragr wrote: | Never discount disordered thinking. | gspr wrote: | It's exhausting. His thinking is literally a direct | threat to human survival as we know it. Yet somehow, we | accept this shit as part of the discourse. I don't see | why we don't treat them like flat earthers or cultists. | seabird wrote: | koheripbal wrote: | I am completely baffled why we still have people who | confuse normal weather for indicators of climate change. | | Climate change is real, but it did not invent bad | weather. | flaviut wrote: | These sorts of measurements aren't done on the basis of one | person eyeballing some pictures or making observations | about the weather around them. | | If you're serious about trying to understand the world | around you, but don't trust others' data analysis, you can | download the raw data & do the calculations yourself. | | Historical tide gauge data: | https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazard/tide.shtml | | You likely want the CO-OPS 1-minute water level data. | | Historical daily weather station data: | https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based- | station/global... | lostlogin wrote: | I think the second link is broken. | maybelsyrup wrote: | This is a great reply but these people aren't here | because they want to learn; they're here the announce | that they're better than you, and know The Truth. So, a | person like this will take your tide data and just tell | you it's false, or flawed, or ask with a wink whether you | really can trust it, etc etc. They're not here for | conversation, they're here for a monologue. | kqr wrote: | That's also the reason back in the 19th century you'd find | hydrologists on every important project, no matter what it | was about. Hydrologists just had to be really good (and among | the first) statisticians. | coffeeblack wrote: | That's called weather, not climate. | [deleted] | easytiger wrote: | And so it has been for 5000 years of recorded history | rvba wrote: | Why there isnt some "not sexy" statup that provides technology to | build artificial lakes / water reservoirs? Just patch them in | random places to collect water, plant some trees and it should | help. Make it in a way that it just requires a small plot of | land, so a group of people can acquire the plot, or even better - | force the muncipiality to provide one. | | I am nit sure if such small reservoirs can help much, but it is | always something. | | Last statup I heard was some company that put rubber balls on big | water reservoirs in California (?) to try to limit evaporation. I | wonder if this helped and if the decaying plastic didnt polute | the water. | vesinisa wrote: | Help with what? This data is from the UK. They traditionally | have to deal mostly with too _much_ rain as far as I know. | seanhandley wrote: | Yes... But think about, say, farming. Too much rain (or not | enough) at the wrong time of year can devastate crops. Seeing | variations on rainfall month by month show how seasonal | patterns in the UK are changing. | | Droughts and floods are the real issue here. | smcl wrote: | You'd think so, but parts of England institute a "hosepipe | ban" in dryer summers to reduce water usage - effectively | saying "you can't water your garden or clean your car for 1 | month" or something. I imagine they're just being overly | cautious though because, as you said, it does rain pretty | frequently in the UK overall. | mytailorisrich wrote: | The issue here is not really 'droughts' it's that the UK | relies on constant rainfall and hasn't much storage | infrastructure or, say, mountains producing melt water in | summer. | | The UK is quite wet and becoming wetter so I think it will | be down to adapting to more rain but perhaps less constant. | | The water distribution infrastructure is also notorious for | being outdated and full of leaks... | pbhjpbhj wrote: | It's cheaper for water companies to institute bans than to | fix leaks and build capacity. Why waste potential profit! | So what if lawns die, farms/gardens lose produce, it's not | like the water companies need to care -- what you going to | do harvest your own (you're not allowed!). | | Same with sewage, they don't bother building the capacity, | just pay off the Tories and they allow it to be pumped raw | into rivers and onto shores. | rowanajmarshall wrote: | > what you going to do harvest your own (you're not | allowed!). | | It's absolutely legal to harvest rainwater in the UK for | private use. Some councils even encourage it! | | Source: https://www.anchorpumps.com/blog/rules- | harvesting-rainwater/.... | jimnotgym wrote: | Some bounds on this | | 1) yes you can have a small 100l tank catching rain water | for your garden, but you can not drink it. If it became a | big tank it would become subject to planning and building | control. 2) you need a permit to harvest ground water by | digging a well or borehole. 3) you need a permit to | entrap water in a pond and to build a dam for this | purpose | tobylane wrote: | Too much for an area is often more to do with excess tarmac | or compacted soil. | | https://metofficenews.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/uk- | rainfal... White is 40-45 inches. That or greater is rare, | the only dark blue in England is a national park famous for | its lakes and rain. The third element of too much rain is | that we like to complain about trivialities. | trhway wrote: | You can't do this today. Laws. The private ponds that you see | are grandfathered. | kevinbowman wrote: | "Shade balls", there are 96M of them in (on?) a big Los Angeles | reservoir : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shade_balls | | They are made from HDPE, with an additive to prevent UV- | accelerated breakdown into bromates (which is what they are | there to stop forming in the water, as well as to stop | evaporation). | throwawaylinux wrote: | > Why there isnt some "not sexy" statup that provides | technology to build artificial lakes / water reservoirs? | | The technology already exists. Bulldozer, excavator, concrete, | explosives. Not not-sexy enough for you? | | > Just patch them in random places to collect water, | | Not sure what "patch" means here, but water is becoming | increasingly regulated, and in a lot of places you can't just | randomly build lakes and dam water even on property you own. | | > plant some trees and it should help. Make it in a way that it | just requires a small plot of land, so a group of people can | acquire the plot, or even better - force the muncipiality to | provide one. | | Should help with what? I feel I'm missing the context you're | replying to. | bell-cot wrote: | THIS. And it's regulated (though often under-regulated) for | damn good reasons. Properly designing even a "little" dam is | far more difficult that most people appreciate. And both | construction and upkeep (which is necessary, _forever_ ) are | really expensive. Maybe start reading here: | https://practical.engineering/blog/2021/10/14/what-really- | ha... | kzrdude wrote: | Is there a data download? Not saying there has to be, but if | there is I'm sure it's fun. | | Anyone browsing (if there are multiple datasets eventually) | probably wants to have some metadata about approximate location | and climate of the location. | 2b3a51 wrote: | The first thing I looked for on the link was a download. | Apparently not provided. I may (politely) email the author and | ask if one is planned in the future. | w0mbat wrote: | If you like this, I have a great episode of Ripping Yarns for | you, starring Michael Palin. | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYpsz2eAKOs | dorfsmay wrote: | The person who created the site, whose father is the one who | collected the data, posted and answers question on Reddit: | | https://old.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/v92fu6/my_... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-11 23:00 UTC)