[HN Gopher] The State Finally Letting Teens Sleep In ___________________________________________________________________ The State Finally Letting Teens Sleep In Author : gadflyinyoureye Score : 173 points Date : 2022-06-12 03:20 UTC (19 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.theatlantic.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theatlantic.com) | tailspin2019 wrote: | > Terra Ziporyn Snider of Severna Park, Maryland, still remembers | how difficult it was for her son to wake up for his 7:17 a.m. | first-period class... | | > That's about to change in California, when a law--the first of | its kind in the nation--goes into effect on July 1 requiring the | state's public high schools to start no earlier than 8:30 a.m., | and its middle schools no earlier than 8 a.m. | | Wow. I may need to reassess my definition of "sleeping in". | | (Spoken as someone who had incredible difficulty getting to | school by 8.50am back in the day and who hasn't gotten up before | 10.30am in the last week!) | mod wrote: | I had to get up at 5:30AM in high school to catch the bus in | time. My bus ride was 45 minutes, and I was the first pickup. | | In the afternoon, I was the last dropoff, which I thought was | grossly unfair. | input_sh wrote: | Hah, same for 3/4 years of my high school! | | I've managed to train myself to fall asleep on the way back | and wake up when the noise in the bus quiets down, in between | the second to last and my stop. | MarcScott wrote: | When I was teaching, I'd get into school for about 7:15am (so | wake up at about 5am), so I could make sure I was prepared for | my lessons that day. My first class was never before 9am, and | school ended at 3:30pm. | | I just couldn't have coped classes starting that early. | bonzini wrote: | What did you do for two hours fifteen minutes? | MarcScott wrote: | - Write lesson plans for the department. | | - Prepare materials for students to work on. | | - Mark students' work. | | - Write assessment reports on students for parents. | | - Write department action plans. | | - Complete SEN reports on selected students. | | - Complete CPD in electronics and CS to upskill in the | subjects I taught. | | - Prototype new projects that the students would engage | with in the future. | | I could go on. For about every hour I spent actually | teaching in a classroom, there was half an hour spent | planning, assessing or completing admin work. I regularly | worked 12 hour days, plus weekends, and all those long | holiday that we were supposed to get. | bonzini wrote: | I was talking specifically of the morning. | filleduchaos wrote: | Personally, nothing about the answer implies that the | given list was not tackled in the morning. | yashap wrote: | Yeah, my high school started at 8:50 am too, and that still | felt too early. This article mentioned that Seattle high | schools used to start at 7:50 am, that seems absolutely nuts. | | I'd peg roughly 9:30 am as a good time for high schools to | start. | permo-w wrote: | If anyone had to change their definition of anything based on | article headlines, the world would be an even more fucked up | place | bogota wrote: | People who have different sleep schedules make the world a | fucked up place? | messe wrote: | Ireland here. My school (which thought entirely through Irish, | aside from English lessons, obviously, advertised itself as | starting and finishing early, and it started at 08:30 as well. | dgfitz wrote: | I went to a high school in the same district as this one, 7:17 | am was absolutely brutal. I had it timed down to the minute so | I could sleep as long as possible and not be late once I | started driving myself. | copperx wrote: | My high school started at 8:30 twenty years ago, and it was | hell waking up to be there on time. Cut a period and let kids | go in at 10am. 9:30am at the earliest. This, of course, will | never happen. Even if it did happen, school at 10 implies that | kids will wake up at 9 or earlier, which is still torturous. | rpdillon wrote: | My son's bus comes at 6:35am, classes begin at 7:15. Really | tough to transition to after elementary, which was an hour | later. | bonzini wrote: | What time does he have dinner and go to bed? | dzhiurgis wrote: | Wonder how this sentiment varies across the latitude? | hstan4 wrote: | Is waking up prior to 9am really considered torturous? Go to | sleep by midnight and you still get 9 hours of sleep, that's | not half bad. | 908B64B197 wrote: | > Go to sleep by midnight and you still get 9 hours of | sleep | | Assuming you can fall asleep at midnight, sure. | curun1r wrote: | A lot of that is sleep hygiene. People rarely had issues | falling asleep early before electrification. And we've | made it even worse with TV, computers and smartphones. | Being very conscious of light consumption and turning off | devices several hours before sleep makes it pretty easy | to fall asleep earlier. | | I'm one of those people who normally can't fall asleep | before midnight and struggles to wake up early, but I've | done a few digital detox programs where I'm without any | electronic devices, and I'm always amazed at how quickly | I fall into a schedule where I'm asleep before 9 and | waking up at 4:30. And it's also amazing how much better | I feel both mentally and physically when I'm on that | schedule. | Nextgrid wrote: | In my opinion teenagers need time for entertainment and | socialization. When adults do it it's normal but when | kids do it it's "TV bad, computer bad, smartphone bad". | | If you assume 8 hours per day for school, maybe one extra | to get to/from school then homework and house chores, how | much time does that leave for entertainment? | | No wonder kids stay up until very late because that's the | only time they actually have for themselves to do | something they actually enjoy and is not being forced | upon them. | khazhoux wrote: | 9 hours of sleep every night?? I'd be happy with 6 or 7. | But I'll need a full-time housekeeping staff and a personal | assistant, to cook, wash dishes, clean the house, wash | clothes, take care of house stuff, pay bills, go grocery | shopping, and everything required for even a basic | lifestyle, etc. | johnfn wrote: | I don't know. My schools first period was 7:50, but that | meant we'd normally have to wake up around 5:45 in order to | get ready for the bus, which came by our house around 6:45. | | A two hour period from waking to being in first period | seemed pretty normal, and even if you subtract that from a | "more generous" 9am, you still get 7am, which is pretty | brutal on adolescents which are known to have shifted sleep | schedules. | zaphod12 wrote: | What on earth were you doing for an hour in the morning?! | Even today I can be out the door in 20 minutes and forget | it, as a teen I probably could do it in 7. | | That is also, I think, an abnormally long bus trip, but | maybe that's my bias. | janeerie wrote: | I'm guessing you weren't a female teenager. | | I had a very similar schedule to the person you're | responding to, except our high school started at 7:25. | I'd take a little extra time in the morning just to get | my head together before going to school. | wyager wrote: | > Is waking up prior to 9am really considered torturous | | It certainly was given the default sleep schedule I had as | a teen. | | > Go to sleep by midnight | | This wasn't something I could intentionally choose to do as | a teenager without the use of drugs like melatonin. | [deleted] | IYasha wrote: | Same. Hell on earth. I would never get up fresh no matter how | early I went to bed. Most of my health problems started there | and so many possibilities were lost! I'd rather have skipped | early lessons, get bad marks, but had more energy to study | later! | munchenphile wrote: | School start is really bounded by the start of the average | parent's workday, unfortunately. Mom and Dad start work at 9 | am. Kids need to be at school before then. None of this 10 am | start talk makes sense for the kids that aren't on the bus | line and have parents that drive them to school. | usrn wrote: | Yet another problem caused by having both parents work. | midasuni wrote: | So how does school stopping at 2:30pm work? How do kids get | back home? | IG_Semmelweiss wrote: | There is no reason for the tyranny of the minority to | dictate terms on everyone else. | | Any parent that wants to torture their kid with a 7am start | is free to do so. | | That choice however shoulsnt dictate the school time for | everyone else. | | Early birds can show up to a long recess pre-class time but | class should only start at 10am or so | thatjoeoverthr wrote: | These are teenagers. Give them house keys and a skateboard. | avip wrote: | We live 25 minutes _driving_ from school. ~2h of | (dangerous) bike ride. | thescriptkiddie wrote: | Wow. I would consider it unacceptable living more than 25 | minutes _walking_ from school. | munchenphile wrote: | Yeah, sorry. That doesn't work in a huge percentage of | areas in the US. Heat, cold, darkness, lack of | infrastructure, and distance. | | When the high is 110 F in a Phoenix suburb, you can't ask | the 14 year olds to skateboard 20 miles to school on a | country road with no breakdown lane. Similarly, you can't | ask kids from Maine to skateboard to school in the dark | on ice. | | Whenever this topic gets brought up, a bunch of seemingly | childless city dwellers think they're making some massive | revelation suggesting that kids just get their own butts | to school at a comfortable 10:30 am. | | It's actually pretty simple: Both parents work. Somebody | has to drive the kids to school (hard requirement -- | there's no bus and a bike/skateboard is too perilous). | Work starts at 9 am. School has to start earlier than | that. | naz wrote: | What time does school finish and why isn't getting home a | similar issue? | munchenphile wrote: | Getting home _is_ a big issue for a lot of families. | School ends around 3 pm, but most kids do some sort of | after school activity like a sport to bridge the gap | until after 5 pm when a parent can come through the | pickup line. Growing up, there was also just general | "after-school" programs. Basically just day care for | after the school day that would cost extra. | daniel-cussen wrote: | That's what Americans get for building the suburbs so | poorly. And Phoenix is uninhabitable, nobody lived there | before AC. | | Let work start later too. Tell that boss he can get with | the times. | mjmahone17 wrote: | Phoenix area schools all are required to provide busses | for junior high and high school kids that live more than | 2.5 miles away. That is generally a walkable distance, | even in the May and August heat. I know, as from middle | school on I did exactly that (walked or biked ~2 miles to | and from school in the Phoenix metro). | | For longer distances it's really not a big deal to bike | to school. No one needs to be dropped off by their | parents, unless they live out of district and chose to go | to a school other than their local one. And even in that | situation, many schools open a half hour or more early, | where kids can be in the library or cafeteria well before | class starts. | rglullis wrote: | And then people say that they live in suburbia because it | is better to raise children... | | And then people say that all the work they do is for the | benefit of their children... | | And then people say that those against mandatory school | attendance are crazy... | standardUser wrote: | Where are school buses in your scenario? I grew up in a | couple different sprawling suburbs and I could always | just walk to the bus stop. | rtkwe wrote: | House keys and a bus though could work though for 90%+ of | kids even in places with extreme weather [0] and you | could have pre-school programs for the 10% that can't | either because their too far for bussing or can't get | themselves to the bus, eg those with assorted | disabilities. You're right though the school start time | is tied to it's function as free daycare for children so | parents can work, COVID proved that is a critical part of | schooling for the modern economy. | | [0] Would need to provide more stops and ideally a better | more consistent schedule so kids could get there just in | time for the bus. Also for hot weather school picks up in | the morning so even the hottest places aren't 110+ at | pickup time. | mostlylurks wrote: | Cold weather and darkness are not obstacles. Here in | Finland the winters are darker, colder, and longer than | in the vast majority of the US, yet even elementary | schoolers usually go to school by themselves, often by | foot or on a bike, sometimes by taking a bus or a train. | | The problem that the US faces with respect to this issue | is primarily caused the design of american cities | (including the surrounding suburbs), which are laid out | in a manner that makes the use of a car a practical | necessity for getting anywhere. You wouldn't have to | worry about a 20-mile country road to school out of a | suburb if you instead made the sensible choice of placing | services (like schools) right where they are needed, as | european cities tend to do, instead of 20 miles away. | scottLobster wrote: | You'd be surprised. Note that Sioux Falls, the capital of | South Dakota, has substantially lower average lows in | Winter than Helsinki. | | https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/finland/helsinki/clim | ate https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/usa/sioux- | falls/climate | | Yes our car-dependent infrastructure is an issue, but | it's infrastructure we've built up for the better part of | a century. Changing it will be slow and gradual, and in | the meantime cold weather and darkness are issues in much | of the country. Also hot weather in other parts of the | country (heat stroke can be a serious concern in the | Southwest) | jds_ wrote: | Pierre is the capital of South Dakota - though Sioux | Falls is the largest city. | | One statistic I've read for eastern South Dakota is that | it's one of the worst states to live if you hate extreme | cold and extreme heat as we have both - sometimes within | a week of each other! | herbstein wrote: | Helsinki is one of the Southern-most cities of Finland | situated on the edge of a large body of water. Instead, | take a look at this Not Just Bikes video covering biking | in Finland during winter: https://youtu.be/Uhx-26GfCBU | | The weather in Oulu during winter looks a lot like the | weather in Sioux Falls, except there's a lot more | precipitation (snow) in Oulu. | bbarnett wrote: | Some of what you say in your second part makes sense, | although it has absolutely no bearing, nor is it a | counter argument to the post you are replying to. It | certainly doesn't refute the parent poster's statements | about now, today, right now, instead, at best, maybe over | 30 years, change could slowly be enacted. | | However, as a Canadian, some of what you say is just | plain gibberish. My rural county, not province or | country, but _county_ , is on its own larger than some | European countries, with a population of 20,000. | | If you tried to put schools within even 10 miles of every | kid, you'd end up with hundreds of one room schools, with | a teacher teaching 4 kids. | | The problem here is, there is no one size fits all. | Trying to make suggestions needs to be more location | specific. | | Because when someone starts talking about rural living in | the US and Canada, Finnish experience has no parallel. | | I mean, come on, I've seen farms, just a single farm | owned by _one man_ in rural Manitobia, larger than | massive cities! | | Millions of acres of land, with just wheat and rye on it! | Owned by a dude, presumably larger than some countries! | mostlylurks wrote: | My comment was not an attempt to refute the entirety of | what the parent comment stated (since I agree with most | of it), merely a response to a tangential aspect of it. | | I am quite aware that what I mentioned is not feasible | for some of the more rural regions that exist in the US | and Canada. However, those constitute a rather small | portion of the population. It is as you say; there is no | one-size-fits-all solution, but certain solutions are so | widely applicable that they could bring significant | benefit to the lives of most americans and are thus worth | pursuing (where relevant) even if they do not solve the | challenges faced by the small number of people living in | the more rural regions of these countries. | stale2002 wrote: | Ok, maybe it is partly caused by the design of cities. | | We aren't going to completely redesign all of America's | cities for the purpose of making sure teens get a bit | more sleep though, so the point is irrelevant. | GayforMoleman wrote: | > That doesn't work in a huge percentage of areas in the | US. Heat, cold, darkness | | Lmao how do people talk like this with a straight face. | TheSpiceIsLife wrote: | There are definitely jobs that start before 09:00. | | My workplace starts at 06:00 or 07:00 depending on how | much work is on, there are no other options. | mellavora wrote: | I used to bike 7 miles to school in Minnesota, year | round, back in the days when we had snow. Old "road | racing" bike (skinny tires). | | In the winter wearing a trench coat, a dr. who scarf, and | beetle-eye mirrored sunglasses so my eyes didn't freeze. | [deleted] | Gigachad wrote: | This is child abuse in America. | derobert wrote: | For high school, the youngest of which are 14, probably | closer to 15? That really doesn't seem like a requirement. | | Well, except when they have to get out the door before | 6:15am... | mbreese wrote: | It is also bounded in the other end by sports. If your | school day goes too late, you won't have time in the | afternoon/evening for sports practices. So, if you still | need X hours for classes, you'll need to start early enough | to get over in time for 1-1.5 hour practices. | | (It also applies to other extracurricular sports, but I | doubt anyone really worries about play practice schedules) | munchenphile wrote: | Well, even in a world where theater is taken as seriously | as sport, at least you can do theater indoors at all | hours. | | You can't really play soccer after dusk if the field is | outside and you don't have lights. So lots of outdoor | sports have strict daylight constraints. | ProjectArcturis wrote: | You could do sports in the morning instead. | GoOnThenDoTell wrote: | Remove the sports, can do that on the weekend | mensetmanusman wrote: | We had sports in the morning, starting at 6 AM. It | definitely helped to wake you up for the rest of the day. | ghaff wrote: | It's not just sports. I didn't do sports in high school | but I had quite a few other after school activities. And, | no, it wouldn't make sense for everyone who wanted to do | extracurriculars to come in on Saturday on a regular | basis--probably driven by parents. | munchenphile wrote: | Delusional. Sports are competitive. They require daily | reps. Sports are also meant to keep kids physically | active and healthy, and to establish a routine of | physical activity into their adulthood (alongside | intellectual productivity). You can't just be physically | active and healthy on the weekend. | cgriswald wrote: | Then have sports be an acceptable substitute to gym | classes and a regular part of the day. I doubt anyone can | explain to me why the captain of our football team also | needed to be in gym class playing flag football with us | in order to graduate in a way where the answer isn't | bureaucratic. | | At some point you have to decide on an optimum between | time, sleep, and output. | munchenphile wrote: | I'm not defending daily gym class. I'm defending daily | sports. | | I was fortunate enough to go to a high school that did | not have a gym period, but required all students to play | an organized sport. | | Gym in large high schools is a waste of time due to the | student to instructor ratio. One frustrated gym teacher | to 50+ kids playing dodgeball? Of course you're going to | have theater kids just going through the motions and goth | kids behind the bleachers smoking cigarettes. It's not | real exercise. | | You need small rosters, organized practices, uniforms, | referees, fans (students and parents) and intra-school | competition. It creates seriousness and expectations. You | can't hide from your coach when there's only 14 kids on | the roster. You need to do the sprints with everyone else | and take the drills seriously. | | I don't think this scales beyond smaller high schools. | Not enough facilities, not enough coaches, not enough | money. | danenania wrote: | That sounds great to me as an athlete, but I know there | are many kids who would hate being forced to be part of | organized sports. | | The important thing is that they get exercise of some | kind. Maybe just allow them to choose whatever form of | exercise they want as long as they do something each day? | | The school could offer sports but also allow them to | walk, run, lift weights (when old enough), play tag, do | yoga, or whatever they prefer. | | If a kid truly hates all exercise and refuses to | cooperate, I guess there's only so much you can do, but | you could at least remove as much friction as possible | and try to meet them where they are. Anything that gets | them moving will offer huge physical and mental benefits | over just slouching in shitty plastic chairs all day. | codefreeordie wrote: | Does that law account for "zero period"? From my quick reading | of the bill, I think it does not -- so probably not that much | will actually change. School may start at 8:30, but zero period | will still start around 7:30, and some schools might create a | double-zero to go earlier still. | | It is absurd how early schools start. Objectively, there was no | good reason why I had to be on my spot on the field at 7:08a | every morning only to be done by 2:50p. | sircastor wrote: | When I was in high school some 20 years ago, I had to be up | no later than 6 if I wanted to make my zero period choir | class. And moving it after school was a no go due to related | (theater or band) extra-curriculars. Regular school started | at 7:20. We have exchange students, and it's slightly better | for them at 7:45... | dTal wrote: | I recall reading in numerous places that the reason for that | is so that the same bus fleet can be re-used to bring the | elementary school children in at the far more reasonable time | of 9 AM. I don't know if it's true, but if it is it's a | uniquely American social phenomenon - inadequate public | transport, a strange mixture of nanny state mentality and | indifference to the welfare of children, and penny pinching | all combining into a perfect storm of chronic sleep | deprivation for an entire demographic of developing brains. | | Another explanation I've read is to make room in the | afternoon schedule for varsity sports practice. Honestly I'm | not sure which is worse. | Nextgrid wrote: | Is there a reason the US have a specific kind of school bus | rather than using the same vehicles as public transport? | | I would think that using normal public transport vehicles | means there would be more capacity rolling around that can | easily be diverted for school bus services during the | peaks, rather than having a very limited set of special- | purpose vehicles? | umanwizard wrote: | What is zero period? | samsolomon wrote: | When I was in high school it was additional training for | athletes before class. For all our programs it was geared | towards strength and conditioning. | | If I remember correctly, we started around 7am. | codefreeordie wrote: | The period before 1st period. | | 1st period being the first "official" period of the day, | which now can't begin before 8:30a. | | Originally, it began life as the before-school time for | athletics and other organized extra-curriculars, but once | it existed, it became a full-fledged period of instruction, | as high-achieving students needed to cram ever more | "elective" courses in order to compete for the top | university slots. | | Even 25 years ago when I was in high school, there was talk | of creating a double-zero for the athletics, the marching | band, and the extra-curriculars, so that elite students | could "still afford" to do them. | | In my district, it didn't happen (With zero starting at | 7:08a, double-zero would have been 6:03a, if I'm | remembering class length correctly). One of the reasons why | it didn't happen is that since there is no "honors | athletics" which can be graded on the 5-point scale, elite | students couldn't afford the grade points to take them | anyway. | Enginerrrd wrote: | This is a really cynical take. | | I took zero period just because I wanted to take | additional subjects. I also didn't want to waste a period | on P.E. so I did various varsoty sports after school | since it counted for a semester each. I took jazz band in | 0 period. | | And I never even bothered applying to college senior year | of high school. | mdouglass wrote: | The law does actually - you can have zero period but it can't | count towards the instructional time required for students. | | It's actually deeply annoying for my daughter's high school. | It already started 1st period at 830, but since 0 period no | longer "counts", the day is getting extended by almost an | hour for all students. | | This is from an email from our district earlier in the year: | | The exceptions to this are zero period classes. Since zero | period classes are optional and not required, these classes | may begin before 8:30 AM; they just cannot be used to meet | the instructional minute's requirements of 64,800 annual | schoolwide instructional minutes | batch12 wrote: | I think I only made it to 'homeroom' a dozen or so times the | entire time I was in high-school. I would have love and | thrived under this. | robswc wrote: | I get it... at the same time though, sure it was hard to wake up | in the morning but that's because I would be up till 12 am | playing video games, lol. | | I can easily see tons of kids going "oh now I can stay up till | 1-2 am" and as someone that is currently struggling to actually | fix my sleep schedule after going WFH, its hard to stay on track. | | Despite all that though, I do hope this shows potential or at | least reveals new information. | ibeckermayer wrote: | That's their and/or their parent's choice to make, the | important point is that the system shouldn't be set up in such | a way that it's impossible for them to live a healthy | lifestyle. | robswc wrote: | How is it impossible currently? | | I had stretches where I would sleep/wake at a full 8 hrs and | in time for school. I would be lying if it wasn't ~90% | personal accountability of winding down when I needed to. | Other 10% was if I were sick or had some insomnia which at | that point wouldn't matter what I did or when school started. | Even struggle with it now. | ibeckermayer wrote: | If school starts at 7:30 and you live an hour away with | school morning traffic, you'd have to get up at 6am at the | latest. Given the need for 8-10 hours of sleep | (particularly for highly active athletes who need the extra | sleep for muscle recovery), you'd need to go to sleep | between 8pm and 10pm. My understanding is that its very | difficult for teenagers to go to sleep before 10 for | biological reasons, so only a teen with monk like | discipline could get the bare minimum (and even then that | might not be enough depending on their exercise regimen). | | So yeah it's technically not "impossible", but it's very | difficult, and it seems to me without good reason. | grapeskin wrote: | There's been research that shows teens have something like a | shifted biological clock. | | Even before the era of late night multiplayer games and | browsing the Facespace and instatoks, teens were staying up, | partying or prowling the streets. It's been a stereotype since | the dawn of time that teens go out late at night and are up to | no good. | robertlagrant wrote: | Really? That sounds pretty unlikely with agricultural | societies getting up at 5, or safe before, say, the 1900s in | most countries. | ChikkaChiChi wrote: | Maybe your stayed up later because that was the time your | body was at its peak awareness. It could be conditioned | that way, or it could be built into your genes. | | After all, somebody had to stay up and keep watch all night | when we lived in caves. | barry-cotter wrote: | Congratulations, you have reinvented a scientific | hypothesis. Unfortunately I can't find a related article | in one minute's search but IIRC even sure extremely small | groups, less than 10 people there's enough variety in | sleep patterns that on average someone is awake for all | but ~30 minutes most nights. | lupire wrote: | What? No. Pack animals don't have members who stay up all | night every night. | | Humans who need night watch take turns in short shifts. | crooked-v wrote: | Society has always done plenty of things that are hugely | unfriendly to basic human nature. Historically it's often | been out of necessity, but fortunately we're well-off | enough now as a group to afford changing that. | robswc wrote: | I've heard of this research. I wouldn't at all doubt it. I | think 8:30 is perfectly reasonable... I just don't think it | will have the effects people think it will. Maybe a marginal | improvement which is fine to shoot for... but I just see too | many kids choosing an extra hour of games/phone vs sleep. | bee_rider wrote: | What's marginal? From the article: | | > Places that have already pushed back school start times | have repeatedly seen positive results. When Seattle's | public-school district shifted its start time in 2016 (from | 7:50 a.m. to 8:45 a.m.), students got a median of an | additional 34 minutes of sleep a night as a result. And in | Cherry Creek, a Denver-area suburb, high schoolers slept | about 45 minutes longer on average, and those improvements | endured even two years after the change. | | 34 extra minutes of sleep on 55 is pretty good IMO. | sperm wrote: | At least it offers the hope of getting up when there's daylight | out. Getting up in the dark is so much harder. | robswc wrote: | I can agree with this. I did always find it a bit jarring | that I had to wake up before the sun was even out, lol. | Thinking about it now you raise a good point. Haven't woken | up that early in years. I find it 100x easier to wake up when | I have the blinds open to hit me in the morning. | tontonius wrote: | I recommend reading Matthew Walker's "Why we sleep". Needles to | say, as a sleep researcher, he's a big proponent of schools | starting later for kids and youth in the formative years. | Especially to make room for the "late morning REM" sleep that | appears to be very important for young humans with developing | brains. | JonoBB wrote: | Some (quite a bit) of this book has been debunked. See | https://guzey.com/books/why-we-sleep/ | | (For the record, I don't disagree with the premise that | sleeping patterns do change during the teenage years) | stevenpetryk wrote: | That's amazing. My high school started at 7:05. By senior year, I | began systematically missing first period because I just couldn't | get up and ready on time without feeling terrible. | JaceLightning wrote: | This is the dumbest thing I ever heard. Just like daylight saving | time. | | You can't make teenagers sleep more by changing the number on the | clock. | bmacho wrote: | > You can't make teenagers sleep more by changing the number on | the clock. | | Actually they are changing the position of the sun on the sky. | blowski wrote: | From the article, I don't think they're forcing them to sleep | more, but giving them the option by starting school later. | JaceLightning wrote: | From the article: | | > Adolescents in the U.S. are chronically sleep-deprived, in | part because most schools start too early. | | The goal of changing the start time is to allow students to | sleep more. | | But changing the number on the clock doesn't mean students | will sleep more. Allowing students to start at 8am instead of | 7am will just mean they go to bed and hour later because | teenagers are terrible about going to bed on time. | blowski wrote: | You're massively over-generalising there. Some will do | that, sure. But this should make it better for some | teenagers, without making it worse for others. That sounds | like a good solution. | thewebcount wrote: | > changing the number on the clock doesn't mean students | will sleep more | | They aren't changing the number on the clock like Daylight | Saving Time did. They're changing when you are required to | arrive. They number on the clocks are staying fixed and | that's why it's more likely to help. | itronitron wrote: | They should just schedule one third of the classes to be | online and from midnight to 2am. | ironmagma wrote: | The thing that changes sleep isn't actually the clock changing. | It's that in combination with "Our business/school opens at 8 | AM every day" and the sun behaving decidedly different from | that. | JaceLightning wrote: | The sun rises between 5am and 7am where I live. | | But anyone who has flown between the East Coast and West | Coast of the US knows that the sun doesn't determine when you | feel tired or when you wake up: your sleep hygiene does. | | I used to fly to SF from Boston and wanted to go to bed at | 7-8pm every night and then would wake up at 4am. Not because | of sunlight but because my body was used to that schedule. | thewebcount wrote: | Has it ever occurred to you that maybe you're atypical in | this way? I've done flights from the US to Europe, and not | slept during the flight and landed in the morning in | Europe. While I'm initially tired, I'm unable to fall | asleep in this situation. I spend the day walking around | outside and eating at local time. After going to bed just a | little earlier (wall time) than usual the first day, I'm | adjusted because of the sun (aka the number on the wall), | food intake, etc. | ghaff wrote: | That's a red eye you're talking about though. Yes, I | normally try to fight through the day and go to sleep at | a normalish time for the location. And I'm usually on a | decent schedule within a day or two. | | But if I take a short trip from the East Coast to the | West Coast in the US, I often go to bed on the early side | and wake up early. | mauvehaus wrote: | It's not just the GP. I've done both US Eastern to EU and | US Eastern to US Pacific enough times to know how I | respond. | | I find the 3 hour difference to the west coast to be way | harder to adjust to than the 5 or 6 hour (depending on | destination) difference to Europe. I'm a zombie for a | week going to California and spring right back to eastern | time going home. | | Going to Europe, it's about a day to fully kick over to | the time change in either direction. Admittedly, it's a | rough day headed east that usually involves an afternoon | nap, but I've come to despise the three hour change to | Pacific time far more. | mod wrote: | The sun determines my sleep hygiene. | LikelyClueless wrote: | Many studies claim the response people have to the | manipulation of light intensity, color, and duration, does | effect several aspects of the person. Sleep hygiene does | seem to play a large role, but the sun is likely the | largest contributor to the human body's roughly 24 hour | circadian rhythm. | JaceLightning wrote: | Ironically it's the wavelengths at sunrise which have the | greatest affect. If teenagers are sleeping in they don't | get to see these: | | > Researchers said the wavelengths at sunrise and sunset | have the biggest impact to brain centers that regulate | our circadian clock and our mood and alertness. | | https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/20022014173 | 1.h... | BlargMcLarg wrote: | Absolutely not my experience at all. Something as simple as | the sun rising up sooner in summer makes me inclined to | wake up and be active earlier, whereas winter makes me feel | groggy and mediocre for several hours until the sun is | actually up. | JaceLightning wrote: | The other thing is responsibility. | | Tech jobs generally don't have set times to be in. But most | jobs do. | | Teaching teenagers responsibility (to go to sleep on time and | wake up on time) is an important skill to have. | wzdd wrote: | > You can't make teenagers sleep more by changing the number on | the clock. | | As a matter of fact, the article cites data from Seattle and | Denver which shows that teenagers slept more after schools in | these areas changed the number on the clock. | JaceLightning wrote: | Of course they will right away. | | Then after a year or two it will be the same problem again. | | Changing the number on the clock to get more sleep is like | taking out a loan to pay down your debt: sure you will be | able to pay off your housing and car payment today, but soon | that loan you took out will come due. | lelanthran wrote: | > Of course they will right away. | | > | | > Then after a year or two it will be the same problem | again. | | According to the article it lasted for _over_ two years. | NobodyNada wrote: | > And in Cherry Creek, a Denver-area suburb, high schoolers | slept about 45 minutes longer on average, and those | improvements endured even two years after the change. | akavi wrote: | You might be able to make them sleep more by having there be | more time between when the sun goes down and when they have to | wake up. | | Humans aren't totally divorced from biological cycles. | Supermancho wrote: | This type of thinking is backwards. Ignoring modern human | behavior is what has contributed to student (and faculty) | performance problems for 50+ yrs. Poor performance in the | earliest classes is a leading indicator for class performance | overall (similar to broken window theory). Supposing | (pretending?) that arbitrary time constraints will force | behavior without confounding effects is the kind of willful | ignorance that has perpetuated poor academic performance around | the world. | JaceLightning wrote: | Tell me: If you go to bed at 11pm and wake up at 7am every | day, and then change time zones, do you magically go to bed | at the new 11pm and wake up at the new 7am? | | No, of course not. | | Because the times you get tired and wake up have nothing to | do with an arbitrary number on the wall. | [deleted] | blowski wrote: | There's a big ball of fire in the sky which does have a | massive impact on us, and those arbitrary numbers on the | wall are a proxy for that. | JaceLightning wrote: | Except it doesn't. | | Anyone who has traveled more than one time zone away | knows this. | blowski wrote: | https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20171208-what- | working-t... | | > He says night workers are exposed to low light levels | during the overnight shift, but as they encounter bright | natural light on the journey home, their internal clocks | lock on to the normal light-dark pattern that day shift | workers are on. "So, you constantly have to override this | sort of biological drive from the clock saying you should | be asleep." | | https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/seasonal- | affecti... | | > A lack of sunlight might stop a part of the brain | called the hypothalamus working properly, which may | affect the production of melatonin, serotonin, and the | body's circadian rhythms. | | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751071/ | | > Our circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nuclei | (SCN) in the hypothalamus, is entrained to the 24-hour | solar day via a pathway from the retina and synchronises | our internal biological rhythms. Rhythmic variations in | ambient illumination impact behaviours such as rest | during sleep and activity during wakefulness as well as | their underlying biological processes. | | I guess the doctors quoted in these articles didn't work | in multiple timezones then. | JaceLightning wrote: | I'm not arguing that the sun isn't good for you or that | bright lights don't make you feel of more awake. Of | course they do. | | My argument is that you can override this with good sleep | hygiene, which teenagers don't have. You have to fix the | hygiene problem, not the clock problem. They are trying | to fix the symptoms and not the cause. | | However, the ironic thing is you are arguing for | teenagers to wake up early and NOT sleep in. It's the | long wavelengths of light at sunrise and sunset that | reset your circadian rhythm: | | > Researchers said the wavelengths at sunrise and sunset | have the biggest impact to brain centers that regulate | our circadian clock and our mood and alertness | | https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/20022014173 | 1.h... | Supermancho wrote: | > I'm not arguing that the sun isn't good for you or that | bright lights don't make you feel of more awake. Of | course they do. | | Shifting your arguments to different topics is only | fooling yourself. You bring up points, which are refuted, | then you claim it has nothing to do with the topic. | That's disingenuous. Now you can look back and figure out | where you've misstated the facts and you want to reset | the conversation. Let's do that. | | > My argument is that you can override this with good | sleep hygiene | | That's not an argument. That's a fact everyone agrees on. | | > You have to fix the hygiene problem, not the clock | problem. | | This strategy that has been pursued for decades (and you | have continued to parrot) is an unmitigated failure. | There is an acute statistical academic penalty for | setting the arbitrary school "early classes" starting | time around ~6-7am^. This is primarily used by students | who are either trying to catch up due to poor past | performance or to get ahead by those pushing the upper | bounds. There is a small cadre of students for which this | schedule aligns with parental obligations, but it has | been shrinking for decades. Due to the pareto | distribution, you can guess who makes up the largest | demographic. | | > They are trying to fix the symptoms and not the cause. | | Time to explore other strategies, as that's been a | failure for a host of reasons. Let's start with the | realities of being an adult vs child->young adult | (youngling, in aggregate). | | Adults manage a stable rhythm via self-training as part | of a long term strategy that dovetails with stable | biological development - which is negatively affected by | other long-term changes like having children, ie mommy | brain. Parents have to get up earlier than the earliest | classes to prepare for transport. School transportation | schedule tend to serve the median start time, not the | boundary, if you didn't notice. | | Younglings have increasing autonomy, hyperactive | metabolism and erratic hormones. They have poor (or none) | training for what is likely a temporary time in their | life, along with the other stresses on themselves and the | family. | | The symptoms are the problem because you cannot address | the cause. No amount of PSAs are going to help, because | it's been tried and failed. Like most pundits, standing | along the side and claiming "that won't work" or "we | aren't doing X enough!" rather than trying to take a | different action to generate new data, is compounding the | failures. | | ^My parents and I had me in early classes for a few | months before we communally agreed to stop. It wasn't | effective learning for anyone in the classes, to say the | least. | Gibbon1 wrote: | I see it as yet another case where we're cutting against the | grain of humanity for ascetic reasons. Bonus people in power | love imposing stuff like that on other people. | phamilton wrote: | 7:30am class was only part of the problem. Sports practice before | school (that would need to conclude before 7:30am class) meant I | woke up at 5am for much of my high school years. | ruffrey wrote: | I recall simply being unable to wake up for first period at 8am | most days, in late high school. Waking was painful and nothing | felt better than sleep. However at night, despite efforts at good | sleep hygiene and consultation from a counselor, i couldn't get | to sleep before 11 or later. My grades and mood suffered greatly, | as did the relationship with my poor mother. She battled with me | day after day, first thing in the morning, to go to school. The | first few years of college I did not schedule any classes before | 10am and had effectively perfect attendance. Mood problems faded | as soon as high school ended. | | Even today, in my 30s, a day or two with poor sleep will make a | noticeable mood dip regardless of circumstances. | | But as an older adult, I naturally wake up at 6:00 every morning. | It was the same for much of my childhood except a few years of | high school. So perhaps this was a developmental thing. | maerF0x0 wrote: | This is exacerbated by an unproductive amount of both homework | and screen time. | | Getting up approximately at sunrise should be fine most people | assuming they have many of the other factors in place like a wind | down period, screen time cut off, dark room, low or soothing | sounds, good temperature etc. | | However I cant imagine that for many kids they have all these in | place, and Id find it hard to believe that anything a high school | maybe trying to teach them today is going to be more lifelong | value than maximizing their physical/brain development (until | 25!) and learning good sleep hygiene. | Gordonjcp wrote: | Hmm, mentioning that sunrise is at 4am gets downvoted. I have | to assume you live in the south. | Gordonjcp wrote: | > Getting up approximately at sunrise should be fine | | What, 4am? | colechristensen wrote: | When your physiology wants you to wake up varies by age and by | individual. It isn't just a matter of sleep hygiene. | [deleted] | [deleted] | jxf wrote: | Thank goodness. May this herald the beginning of an era of | sensible public school policies. We don't need to be making the | lives of teens harder than they already are. | logicalmonster wrote: | My overall opinion on this is mixed. | | > The Good: I think even mentioning the lack of sleep for kids as | a problem is a good first step. As far as physical health, | learning, and daily mood goes, good sleep is a really big part of | the equation. | | > The Bad: Despite having a later wakeup time, I think most teens | probably will not get a whole lot of extra sleep. Kids are kids | and will stay up later to play games, watch movies, or do | whatever else they love to do knowing that they have more time to | sleep in. | | > The Ugly: I think acknowledging the mental health crises among | many kids is a good step, but I don't think you're going to | really fix anybody who might be in a danger zone by telling them | that they have the option to wake up a bit later. I sincerely | doubt that a sleep deficit is the issue that inspires extremely | negative life-threatening behavior among anybody. | | PS: As a practical matter, was it mentioned in this article if | ending times for schools were changed by this new policy? If it | was, I didn't notice it, and that's what I wanted to see | mentioned here. I'm just thinking about my own past experience, | but if school begins say an hour later but also ends an hour | later, I'm not sure that would have been a net benefit to school- | aged me. It would have been very difficult for me to get all the | way out to my soccer practice or work my part-time, after-school | job if the school's ending time was pushed back. | mdouglass wrote: | re: your PS - it will depend on the school district, but my | daughter's high school is significantly extending their day. | They were allowed to leave this year at 225 (with an optional | 7th period that went to 310). Next year, they end at 329. And | she gains no benefit in the morning because they already | started first period at 830. | bee_rider wrote: | About the ugly: While I don't think just being tired is the | essential cause of many problems, it does seem like it could be | pretty wide-ranging. So, if every decision you make is a little | bit worse and your emotional state is always just a little big | degraded, this seems like it could compound pretty easily -- | you'll be dealing with the consequences of your previous poor | decisions while still tired and irritable. | walkhour wrote: | > Despite having a later wakeup time, I think most teens will | probably not get a whole lot of extra sleep. Kids are kids and | will stay up later to play games ... | | This needn't be true, the natural time for teens to go to sleep | is 10-11pm [0]. So at this time they may feel tired, and go to | sleep. | | [0] https://www.uclahealth.org/sleepcenter/sleep-and-teens | cgriswald wrote: | I think you're overstating what the source is saying a bit. | Yes, that's _literally_ what the source says, but it feels | exemplary and to the extent it 's true, it's true because of | a lot of hidden assumptions. The source is basically saying | "a normal teen in a vacuum gets sleepy at this time" but it | points out many ways in which teens are not in any such | vacuum and how they should be trying to get into and stay in | that vacuum. A real teen doesn't live in that vacuum. | | _Teens are already staying up past their natural sleepiness | time._ Sleepiness is not the problem. | | The problem with teens and sleep is not just that we expect | them to get up early. We also expect them to go to school, do | sometimes hours of homework, do as many extra-curricular | activities as they can cram onto a CV, have jobs, spend time | with family, and they usually want to have fun with friends | and date. They're already sleeping as much as they can. (Many | of them are also abusing caffeine and other drugs to manage | all of it.) | | Humans have two mechanisms for sleepiness. The first is a | 'time since last sleep' function that builds sleepiness over | time. This is delayed in teen. (This mechanism will respond | poorly to later start times.) The second is a 'has it gotten | dark' function that responds to the daylight. This is _also_ | delayed in teens. | | Very likely many teens will simply stay up later. They'll | have to in order to keep doing all they want and are expected | to do. | | However, the delayed start is still a good thing because it | is much better aligned with the second mechanism of | sleepiness, gives them more opportunities for sleep, and will | likely reduce their morning grogginess, even if they don't | get more sleep overall. | dangus wrote: | Regarding the bad you listed, the article addresses it and | basically debunks your concern. Schools that made the change | saw teens getting more sleep. | | > When Seattle's public-school district shifted its start time | in 2016 (from 7:50 a.m. to 8:45 a.m.), students got a median of | an additional 34 minutes of sleep a night as a result. And in | Cherry Creek, a Denver-area suburb, high schoolers slept about | 45 minutes longer on average, and those improvements endured | even two years after the change. | | I'm also not sure what's so "ugly" about your "ugly" point. | Starting school later isn't about solving every possible | problem for at-risk kids. | logicalmonster wrote: | > I'm also not sure what's so "ugly" about your "ugly" point. | | A very short version of my answer to this is that it's a big | deal because if this sort of action is portrayed to the | public as solving the mental health crisis in teens, then the | real reasons for many issues might be completely ignored. The | bureaucracy might claim a false victory and then hope | everybody moves on and ignores some bigger issues that | creates such an unhealthy environment in schools. | colechristensen wrote: | Teenagers wanting to stay up late is natural, not the product | of some social evil but a built in feature of being a teenager. | madeofpalk wrote: | Less of a feature and more of a "known issue". | | A known issue that I'm still trying to sort out in my 30s. | normac2 wrote: | Seems like this could create a group of kids who were formerly | driven to school and live out of schoolbus range, but their | parents go to work too early to be able to drive them now. | | I wonder if there are provisions for this in the new plan (e.g., | the school opens early for kids to just hang around if they still | need to be dropped off early). | bobthepanda wrote: | It is really unfortunate that we have created a society and | physical landscape where children cannot get to school on their | own. | | In 1969, 48% of children walked or biked to school. In 2009 | that figure is 13%. | http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org/introduction/the_decline_of_... | | Even if you happen to live close enough to a school and the | walking environment is safe, it's not unheard of for Child | Protective Services to be called on parents for letting their | children be autonomous. | | And with the decline in routine physical activity we are now | generally less healthy. | ryandrake wrote: | We need penalties for these nosy people who call Child | Protective Services when there is _clearly_ no danger to the | child. In some states, you can get in serious trouble (jail | time) for abusing E-911 service, why can 't people get in | trouble for falsely reporting a child who they know is not in | danger? The trick is how do you define "clearly"? I'd at | least expect a caller to be able to articulate a specific | danger they observed the child was in (someone following them | or the child was not dressed for the weather, and so on). Not | just "he's alone therefore help". | sigstoat wrote: | every school i attended was open well in advance of the start | of classes so as to serve breakfast to kids who ate it there. | | at the elementary school level there were even some enrichment | programs beforehand. | | even if some kids still have to wake up early, they can benefit | from not having to have to take tests until a bit later in the | morning. | Gibbon1 wrote: | I remember high school back in the 1970's. Classes started at | 8:30 and had 6 periods. But the last one was all optional | classes. It's deranged they didn't flip that. | | Feels like start times have gotten worse. Especially due to | paranoia about letting kids walk around by themselves. Busing | and low density suburbs. And school closures. Probably also | administrators impulse to inflict control on students and | teachers. | Mountain_Skies wrote: | I don't know about California but I know in the state I grew up | in, there was a legal requirement for the school to send a bus | to pick you up if you lived in the school district and were | further than walking distance from the school. Several times | our bus ended up with a new home added to the route midyear, | which required some tricky maneuvering on dirt roads and | created a longer ride for anyone whose stop came after those | new spots. | jorl17 wrote: | I think I very rarely woke up earlier than 7h30 or 8h30 as a kid. | I recall school starting usually at 9am. | | Nowadays I struggle to get up before 10h30[1] (I set all my | meetings starting at 10h30, and usually wake up 10 minutes before | them -- the wonders of remote working). I have never been a | morning person, and I cannot believe that there are parts of the | world where children are forced to wake up so early. I'm sure | it's fine for many, but it must be equally terrible for others. | | In my college days, classes equally started at 9h, but I almost | always managed to get them later. There was this own professor | who insisted on having his class tart at 8h30 which is incredibly | frustrating: he was a drunkard who, in spite of being the only | one to haave a class start before 9AM, was always late, and AFTER | 9AM. I got up way earlier because of this garbage human. | | (I still very clearly hold a grudge against him, because he | marked my final grade a 19.4/20; I'm sure he did it because he | didn't want to give me a 20). | | [1] I can get up before 10h30 fine, and sometimes I get up as | early as 6h30 "as needed". But it's definitely not good for me | "in the long run" and renders me less productive overall. It is | clear my natural rhythm is going to bed at 2h-4h and waking up at | 12h-14h. Alas, I go to bed at 2h-4h and wake up 10h-12h. I | suppose I'll die younger, but such is life. | | It's not the amount of sleep, because I've often been able to do | great on just 3-5h of sleep consistently. I can sleep 5h, 10h, | you name it, and it doesn't matter if I wake up early. Waking up | early really ruins me. | deathanatos wrote: | Welp, my high school started at 7:50am. Would wake up well | before sunrise for it. It was a struggle to stay awake. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | I was never a morning person...until I chose to wake up at 5am | every day. Now I'm a morning person. | | I think we are flexible enough to be whatever we want. | BlargMcLarg wrote: | I was never a morning person until I chose to wake up at 6AM. | Then I was still not a morning person and hated the first 4 | hours of the day even more. | | Then I went back to past 9 and was happy. | jolmg wrote: | If you normally wake up at e.g. 10, did you fall sleep 4 | hours earlier than normal when trying to wake up at 6? | BlargMcLarg wrote: | Obviously. Comparing different sleeping times without | keeping the same length would be way too obvious for | people to point out as a problem, even if forcing oneself | to sleep earlier isn't as easy as people try to push. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > I think we are flexible enough to be whatever we want. | | There are definitely _some_ people out there who have | severely distorted sleep schedules that won 't respond to | adjustments. | | However, I think it's far more rare than a lot of people | think. There are a lot of people whose shifted sleep | schedules come mostly from lifestyle factors, not genetics. | | This becomes most obvious when you watch new parents adapt. | Most of the "genetic late sleepers" I knew mysteriously | became natural morning people after having kids. | | I had a coworker who insisted he simply _could not_ show up | to work before 11AM due to his sleep genetics. That is until | he went on a camping trip for a week and his sleep schedule | completely normalized. He was showing up at 9AM wide awake | (and happy!) for several weeks after that, but then slowly | shifted back to his 11AM arrivals as his sleep schedule | deteriorated from his lifestyle. The culprit, in his case, | was late-night internet usage that he wouldn 't give up. At | least he recognized and accepted the actual problem later. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | Sounds about right. Sleep disorders are rare yet everyone | thinks they have a sleep disorder. It's most likely poor | habits. The best thing for me was having a routine. | jorl17 wrote: | I have tried this. In fact, I have lived for several months | consistently waking up at 7AM because I had to. I functioned, | it was okay, I was productive and I'd say happy, but | eventually I drifted back to my natural schedule and I | realized ALL that I was missing out on and had forgotten | about. People change. My mother used to be a "party girl" and | she says that her life completely changed when I was born. | She started waking up early, like 7AM, and that was far out | of her schedule (I think she lived like me, to be honest). So | I'm sure I may one day change, but that hasn't happened yet, | even after living for the aforementioned months in a very | different way[1]. | | But I can very confidently say that while I can certainly | function, be productive at my job, be liked by my peers, and | be happy waking up at 7AM, I can be much better at | everything, and much happier (and even creative!) if I just | follow my more natural rhythm. | | To be honest, I've grown particularly tired of some morning | people insisting that if I just "tried it", it would "work" | and that the morning is so much better and we can adapt. That | I "need" to change because that's how "everyone works". I did | try. It didn't work as advertised. Functional, even happy, | but in nearly every way inferior to what I am now. Moreover, | it's been obvious for a long long time, in many ways, that | I'm not like "everyone else". Look at it from whatever angle, | and I'm not. It's life, I live with it and enjoy it, and I | guess that's what ultimately matters. | | [1] Someone below mentioned this is based on the environment | and context, and not genetics. I can certainly agree, but my | environment won't change overnight, nor do I want it to. My | life right now works much better, and makes me happy with my | current schedule. Perhaps in the future it won't be like | that. | inglor_cz wrote: | I wonder how much of this problem is caused by our sedentary | lifestyles. | | I am a bit of a night owl myself, but I sleep much more soundly | if I have a lot of physical activity across the day. If I walk 20 | 000 steps and spend an hour in the gym, I have no trouble falling | asleep. | | Teenagers being the bombs of energy that they are, might need | some 5-6 hours of physical activity to actually tire and sleep | well. But a typical highschooler sits most of the day on his/her | ass. | colechristensen wrote: | Individual and age based preferences for early or late sleeping | schedules have been observed in modern day hunter gatherer | tribes. It is highly doubtful that this has anything to do with | modern lifestyles instead it is a feature of humanity. | | The concept that everyone should keep the same sleep schedule | and at that an early rising one is the product of the | industrial revolution and Protestant work ethic in the west. It | is unnatural. | inglor_cz wrote: | "It is unnatural." | | Most of our lifestyle is unnatural (we live _very_ | differently from the original hunters and gatherers), but we | could often find ways how to adapt without causing too much | suffering. | | If teenagers suffer, I would look at various methods how to | mitigate their suffering. Starting the school later is an | obvious quick patch, but we shouldn't ignore other problems, | such as quality of sleep in general. Not least because some | of the problems may persist indefinitely. | | Having not enough physical activity is, in my opinion, a | contributing factor, though not probably an overwhelming one. | dymk wrote: | Many studies have shown that teenagers go to bed later and | wake up later, and forcing them to wake up earlier is bad | for their cognition. People generally start naturally | waking up earlier as they get older. | TaylorAlexander wrote: | Personal anecdote but I was extremely active in high school, | playing football, mountain biking 20-40 miles every week, and | working an outdoor job, and it was a nightmare to wake up for | my 9:15am classes. High school for me was 1999-2003 so I didn't | spent a whole lot of time on the computer, which was in my | older brother's room. | rapht wrote: | Yeah well... or just have parents requiring lights and phone off | at 9pm. | dylanz wrote: | Lights off at 9pm? That's not how most teenagers work. I used | to read until midnight most nights. | ceejayoz wrote: | My kids haven't yet wondered how the Kindles they hide under | their pillows have never run out of charge. | crooked-v wrote: | Given the evidence pointing at teenagers having a different | biological clock, that just gets you a bunch of insomniacs | sneaking out anyway. | jimbob45 wrote: | You're right but no one wants to admit it. It's just like how | computers have become orders of magnitude faster over the | years, yet end users feel none of it because we use every new | cycle we can squeeze out. Likewise, if you give kids more | hours, they'll fill them with more extracurriculars or computer | time. | ceejayoz wrote: | Principal Skinner: "Am I out of touch? No, it's the children | who are wrong." | thewebcount wrote: | Yeah, like that would work. My parents weren't completely | unreasonable about bedtimes but did require us to go to bed by | something like 10 or 11PM so we didn't keep them up all night | with our noise. I would then lie in bed staring at the ceiling | until I fell asleep at 2AM. Nothing I was able to do would help | me fall asleep sooner. Then I'd just barely wake up at 6AM and | drag my ass into the shower. I'd basically sleep through first | and second hour. Our lunch started at something ridiculous like | 10AM. My body couldn't make heads or tails of it and my | circadian rhythms were totally fucked for the next 4 to 8 | years. Luckily I have a sane job now and haven't set an alarm | in about 20 years. | fortran77 wrote: | Kids who are early risers will suffer. | pessimizer wrote: | Will they, or will they have a lot of free time in the morning? | Time they could even spend doing homework, giving them their | evenings free and clear. | | edit: as an early riser myself, that absolutely doesn't mean | that I want to go in early. I enjoy having hours to myself in | the morning, being able to relax, cook a nice breakfast, _maybe | watch a movie_ , before going in. I don't know why it has to be | the standard that we be in a frustrated hurry every morning. | zahma wrote: | Not totally a benefit. In the Midwest, if you start class at | 9:30, as some middle schools do due to bussing availability, | you'd get out at 4:30. In the winter, the sun has set. How | horrible that is to feel like the day was spent inside a dingy | and neglected building. The advantages of sleep must also be | weighed against other psychological benefits. | cvccvroomvroom wrote: | For grades 3 - 5, forced busing 90 minutes each way in California | to the bad part of town because of skin color required waking up | at 4:55 am every morning. Didn't get home until late evening. If | I was any other ethnicity, I wouldn't have been required to be | subjected to a worse and more dangerous school. | | Middle school (grades 6-8) were waking up at 6:30 am to be there | by 7:30. | | And then high school (grades 9-12) was waking-up at 7 am to | arrive by 8. 20 minute bike ride each way. | | Kicker: I had undiagnosed sleep apnea, ADHD, anxiety, and | depression. | frogpelt wrote: | Who's making all these kids stay up late? | lumost wrote: | I really don't understand the pressure to start schools so early, | it seems contrary to the goals of both children and parents. | | A parent needs their kids to be supervised until they come home | from work. Kids need to get sleep. Schools are presently time | shifted between 2and 3 hours early relative to parental | schedules. | | My only question is why? School could start 3 hours later and | kids would get out roughly at the time their parents are coming | home from work. | MattGaiser wrote: | Places where schools start early also may be places where work | starts early. For example, I live in Calgary. My high school | started at 8 and many kids got there at 7:30. Work in Calgary | also starts at 8ish in my experience. | | Toronto's public school board opens for 8:30 and classes start | at 8:50. Work starts at 9 in Toronto. | lumost wrote: | This may be a Canadian thing. where I went to school in | Connecticut, school began at 7:15 AM with the first busses | arriving at 6:30 AM. A non trivial portion of students had to | be out of the house by 5:30 AM to make the bus. | | Work on the other hand started at 9-9:30AM. While I didn't | experience this directly, my mother must have had the brutal | schedule of being up at 5 AM and arriving home at 6 PM. | throwaway_coin wrote: | I didn't have time to sleep. | | I was in AP Classes, plus working 35 hours a week. | | In hindsight, I would have filed for emancipation and started | freelancing immediately. | | High school is a waste of time. | danschumann wrote: | The later they start, then the less time they'll have to get in | trouble after school. Basically no one gets in trouble BEFORE | school, right? Oh wait.. I got suspended once before school. Is | there any studies on whether or not people are more likely to get | in trouble based on time of day? | standardUser wrote: | If we want kids to get into less trouble, let's just | recategorize a lot of the mostly-harmless behaviors that we | consider to be "trouble". | Mountain_Skies wrote: | Afternoon rush hour tends to be worst than morning rush hour | since more people leave at the end of the workday at the same | time than arrive at the start of the workday. For schools, does | letting everyone out at the same time create more opportunities | for conflict and trouble? Or does the before school period | that's usually unstructured allow more due to how little | supervision there is? For my schooling, I remember far more | after school conflict, most arising from events during the | school day. Kids tend to forget grudges much easier than adults | so maybe in the morning they're not as upset at the insult they | heard from a classmate as they were the previous afternoon. | aynyc wrote: | This is all good and well. I had a hard time waking up in high | school, but all my AP classes are in the morning 8:00-9:30ish. I | didn't have a choice. | rr808 wrote: | So they start later, do they finish later too? So have dinner | later, homework later, go to be later and same result? | joe__f wrote: | In the UK it's normal for schools to start around 9am. I thought | this was some kind of avant gate experiment letting teens start | at 11am, I would've loved that at 15. I didn't realise schools | started so early in the states, 7am seems pretty sadistic to me | warning26 wrote: | It's because surburban parents demand these early start times | so they can drop their kids off while commuting to work. | | A ridiculous justification, of course, but that's what you get | with a combination of helicopter parenting and a society | overreliant on cars. | quickthrower2 wrote: | Also wealth erosion. Inflation. Property prices. Both parents | have to work full time. | Thlom wrote: | I get it for kids younger than 8-10 (depending on the kid), | but after that age kids should be able to get out of the | house and to school on their own. For the youngest it can be | solved with a before school program. The kids just need a | place to eat breakfast and chill with their friends before | the school day starts. | Gigachad wrote: | Letting a child under 18 step outside without being in a | car or under direct parent supervision is child abuse in | the US and the police will usually be called. | Nextgrid wrote: | As a non-American I can't tell whether this is sarcasm. | cool_dude85 wrote: | I had always heard the explanation that early HS start times | were to allow the possibility of an after-school job. Not | sure which is true. | 83457 wrote: | In my area they swapped high school and middle school times to | help HS teens. My 7th grader got up at 5:45am to get ready and | catch bus at 6:45am. | switch007 wrote: | It's not the state in control of when children sleep, it's | business owners. | | Children are dropped off at school at the time that allows the | parents to get to work at the time required by their boss. And | they're picked up when their boss let's them go. | | The school day (in the form of sports/clubs etc) is extended to | keep up with longer working days and the second parent having to | work full time instead of part time. | | And two parents have to work because they need the combined | salary to make the mortgage work, for a home big enough for | everyone. | | We work too long and too much for too little and if we don't | address the root causes then little is going to really change | warning26 wrote: | _> Children are dropped off at school at the time that allows | the parents to get to work at the time required by their boss. | And they're picked up when their boss let's them go._ | | If only there were some way for students to get to school that | wasn't their parents dropping them off. Some kind of bus maybe, | but for students. We could call it a "school bus" perhaps. | cool_dude85 wrote: | Where I live, middle school aged kids still run the risk of | big trouble for being unsupervised. 6th grade starts at 11 | years old. So the bus can drop them off and pick them up, but | better be there when they leave and when they get home. | looperhacks wrote: | Man, living in Germany, we started walking to school or | taking the bus alone on the third day of first grade (6yo) | eertami wrote: | Kids walk to and from school at like 5 years old in Europe. | In some countries they also walk home for lunch, since | there is a break with no childcare where they have to go | home to eat. | | If children are never allowed to learn independence, then | you end up in this never-ending feedback loop of required | supervision. | snarf21 wrote: | Snark doesn't solve problems. When I was in middle school, it | was a 45 minute bus ride. The same bus had to drop us off at | 7:30 am so they could get back in time to pick up the | elementary kids and get them to school on time. So the bus | picked us up at 6:45 am which means we are waking up around | 6:15 at the latest. That isn't sleeping in. The GP is right, | the parents still need to be there for the 6th grader to get | on the bus and _ALSO_ make it to work on time at 8:00. Not | everyone lives 5 minutes from work. In some rural areas | parents have an _hour_ drive even after their kids get on the | bus or get dropped at daycare. | Gigachad wrote: | That's because the school is still scheduled around driving | parents. If children majority took the bus, they could | start school at 10:00 and leave it up to the remaining car | users to make that work. | | And some edge case about rural towns doesn't mean much when | even urban schools have this issue. | snarf21 wrote: | I can only speak to where I went to school, but even now, | 90% of kids ride the bus. I'm not sure how school can | start at 10:00 if the parents have to be there to get an | 8 year old safely on the bus but somehow still make it to | work by even 9:00. | c22 wrote: | Schools should have overlapping morning and evening periods and | families should get to choose which one their student attends. | mbreese wrote: | Tha doesn't always work. The school I was supposed to go to for | high school (before moving prior to the year starting) did that | by default. Grades 11-12 started early and got out early. | Grades 9-10 started later and ended later. There were about 3 | hours of overlap. | leksak wrote: | I think the comment you are replying to would suggest that | for every kid that choice gets to be made by their parent(a) | /guardian as to whether or not they start late or early. | mbreese wrote: | I was trying to give a counter point about that type of | flex schedule already happening at some schools. But it | isn't based on parental choice. | | It's a hard thing to do in practice. You can't have 1/3 a | 1/2 of the classes duplicated throughout the day. Are you | going to have two honors chemistry classes? Not all of the | classes could be offered in that core set of hours when | everyone was there. Or are you only going to have electives | in the morning and afternoon hours? | | It worked for the larger school because the classes were | split by grade. So you didn't have two freshman English | classes. You had freshman in the afternoon and seniors in | the morning. | | The real problem is now instead of covering 6-7 hours of | classes, teachers would need to cover 9-10 hours. You | aren't going to hire more teachers to do this. Is the | Economics teacher going to only have classes from 7-10 and | then 1-4? | | The more I think about it, the more unworkable it seems. | c22 wrote: | Why can't we hire more teachers? | mensetmanusman wrote: | There could be learning centers where everyone takes their own | self-paced courses and stays and goes as needed. | theptip wrote: | > That's profoundly unsettling, particularly in light of data | released by the CDC in April showing that 44 percent of high | schoolers said they'd had "persistent feelings of sadness or | hopelessness" during the past year, and 20 percent had seriously | contemplated suicide. | | One second-order effect of Covid is that it completely confounds | the statistics collection for a wide swathe of issues. With a | huge one-off exogenous shock in emotional and physical well- | being, it's basically impossible to make inferences using these | statistics from the last couple years. | | Maybe we can compute the "Covid baseline impact" but because of | the very regional response, it will be extremely hard to control | for this factor. | barry-cotter wrote: | This is ridiculous. The CDC doesn't care about teenagers' | mental health. They're using this specific effect as an | argument for something they actually care about. School is | itself deleterious to teenagers' mental health. School causes | suicide. This is as you would expect from an institution that | constrains them from doing what they want and following their | interests, that is hostile to their autonomy as such. | | > What sticks out is a large decrease in teen suicide rates | during the summer vacation months of June/July/August. In | contrast, the somewhat older group sees, if anything, an | increase in suicide rates in the summer. There's also a drop in | high school suicides in December, around winter vacation. | | https://www.basilhalperin.com/essays/school-and-teen-suicide... | dbavaria wrote: | The CDC also has numbers from 2009-2019, the following report | shows similiarly shocking numbers pre-covid: | | https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/mental- | health/index.htm#:~:.... | logifail wrote: | Our 12-year old (but turning 13 soon! :eek:) has to leave the | house on foot at 6.50am at the latest for the 10min walk to the | station to catch a train to school, he gets there around 7.35am | and his first lesson starts at 7.50am | | Our 9-year old leaves on a (non-electric) scooter at 7.25am for | the 10-min journey to school, he needs to be there for 7.45am | | Our 6-year old leaves with me either in the car at 8.25am if | we're late, or 8.15am on bikes if we're early, for kindergarden. | | After all that, my wife gets up :) | quickthrower2 wrote: | Sounds chaotic but kind of magical (ridiculous times excepted) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-12 23:00 UTC)