[HN Gopher] If it isn't going to work, just shut it down ___________________________________________________________________ If it isn't going to work, just shut it down Author : imartin2k Score : 54 points Date : 2022-06-14 05:04 UTC (17 hours ago) (HTM) web link (99d.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (99d.substack.com) | TameAntelope wrote: | What's the difference between a pivot and founding a new company? | | Sometimes your company has some baggage (messy cap table, bad | hires, a down round, etc), and pivoting brings that baggage | along. On the other hand, forming an entirely new company takes | time and effort that may not be necessary. | | What do fundraising entities think when they see a company | fold/exit somehow in a way that keeps the founder free, and the | founder immediately found a "similar" company solving an "only" | marginally different problem? | nlh wrote: | A great quote sticks in my mind, shared with me by a founder who | was going through hard times with his startup. The company was | going through a bad spot, and one of his investors suggested just | giving up and returning the existing capital to the investors. An | advisor then said: | | "It's not their money anymore. Don't you dare give up." | | He didn't, he persevered, and the company had a fine outcome | years later. I would not blindly follow OP's advice. | pram wrote: | And that founders name? J. Robert Oppenheimer! | Ensorceled wrote: | > They shouldn't go through down-rounds, cap table | restructurings, multiple major pivots, or team transitions. | After all that, is it even the same company? No. They should | just shut down and start over. | | The article is talking about pivots not a lack perseverance ... | lostgame wrote: | Simply watching 'Dragon's Den' will reveal how ludicrously | passionate people are about some of the _worst_ ideas. | | I don't really agree with the article, though. If it's not | achieving the results you want, it doesn't inherently mean it's a | bad idea. | fourseventy wrote: | pretty dumb article in my opinion. Part of being a good | entrepreneur is struggling through hard times and figuring out a | way to survive and make shit work when things aren't going well. | If you follow this articles advice and quit at the first sign of | trouble you won't get very far. | memish wrote: | On the other hand, that advice would have killed off Tesla and | SpaceX at least 15 years ago. | ncmncm wrote: | We can dream. | dvt wrote: | What's up with the weird Elon hate recently? I don't care for | the guy one way or another, but it's just bizarre. Plus, I | have friends that worked for both Tesla and SpaceX and from | what I hear, apart from being big and corporate-y, it's a | pretty awesome place to be at. | christkv wrote: | He's of the wrong tribe now it seems | anonu wrote: | You can also lose face by doing what article suggests, which is | "quitting". investors want a return on their money. They believe | in your idea and management can make it happen. If management is | no longer on board, what's to prevent investors from finding new | management? Of course, easier said than done and depends on | company stage. The downside (some risk capital) is small for an | investor compared to the upside they're looking for, or that | you're promising. | analog31 wrote: | Do investors have any evidence based reason to think a company | has a better chance the second or third try, or a worse chance | for that matter? | | Does past performance matter? | habitue wrote: | What about the classic story of the AirBnB founders pivoting from | selling cereal? | | It seems like the metric for whether you decide to pivot or shut | down depends on how many rounds you've done and how many | employees you have. | | Early on, couple of founders & handful of employees: maybe do | whatever pivots you can to survive. | | If you're a big boat and pivoting will require firing 80% your | staff and starting an entirely different product, maybe consider | just shutting down. | | (If you've got solid revenue but are just unprofitable, none of | this probably applies, you should try whatever you can to save | the revenue stream) | fragmede wrote: | But selling repackaged cereal in cutesy boxes was never | Airbnb's long term plan. Can it be called a pivot at that | point? | newbieuser wrote: | airbnb is a business model that has proven to be a great idea | at one point. but I wonder if this is valid for every business | idea? In other words, can every business model that has been | followed for years be successful? | ncmncm wrote: | Yes: e.g., Energy Vault (NRGV, $2B+) absolutely cannot work, and | should be shut down immediately. Maybe give back whatever of the | pigeons^Winvestors' money is left? Somebody should sue the | founders for fraud. | | The crane thing was actively stupid, and very obviously could not | ever have worked. An investor who bothered to consult literally | any mechanical engineer would have run a mile. Lots did, of | course. But somebody bade the thing up. | | The current "condominium for concrete blocks" scheme could | probably be made to sort of work, for a while, until it breaks, | but only at 100x the price of the storage that utilities will | actually buy, instead, because they are not all complete idiots, | and anyway have engineers on staff. | | I expect NRGV to pivot to orbital beamed solar power, next, or | orbital mirrors to light up your solar farm at night. Anything | that would take a long time to prove can't work would meet their | needs. | brazzy wrote: | Can you give a quick rundown why "the crane thing" could not | ever have worked, and what exactly it was, separate from the | "condominium for concrete blocks", which seems to be what is | described in the Wikipedia article, but also uses cranes? | | As a non-mechanical engineer, it's not obvious to me. | tschellenbach wrote: | My first startup went through 2 majors pivots and eventually did | quite well. The most valuable bit though was the experience. | Second startup is in great shape thanks to that experience. | | I think many founders give up too early. You wont learn if you | don't go through some difficult experiences. | bsder wrote: | It seems the prime directive to startups is "stay alive no | matter how". If you can do that, eventually luck will find you. | | It's when VCs enter the picture that this becomes complicated. | VCs want their pound of flesh back generally sooner than you | will get lucky. | diob wrote: | Keep in mind survivorship bias though. There are probably loads | who pivot multiple times yet still end in failure. | harpiaharpyja wrote: | It's tricky though, you often can't tell if you are in the | survivor set or not until after all those attempts at | perseverance. Its easy to assume that after N failures the | company is not in the survivor set, but you can never | actually know. So without perseverance, no one would be a | survivor. | yrechtman wrote: | OP here. I think i mixed the message too much by putting | pivots in the same category as founder transitions and | down-rounds. | | Pivots are fine. But when you're basically just starting | over on a completely new business with less money and a | demoralized team, your likelihood of success is | significantly impaired. Successful pivots need to carry | ~something~ over of value | ncmncm wrote: | Yes. Letting them start over on something completely | different is indulging sunk-cost fallacy. People were | hired on the strength of being able to build X. If they | are not who you would have picked to build Y, then | getting them building Y anyway means you start out with a | broken leg. | skybrian wrote: | On the other hand, if the team works well together, maybe | they would actually be good at building something | different? | | It seems like this will vary significantly depending on | the team and the new plan. How valuable is it, really, to | keep this team together? | bombcar wrote: | The pivot can be key - especially if you've built a team that | can execute, identifying early that your plan won't work and | pivoting to something else can help. And in the worst case, | you've learned more. | rossdavidh wrote: | For those who (like me) didn't get the reference, the "Ship of | Theseus" is a thought problem about whether, if every part of the | ship has individually been replaced, it remains the Ship of | Theseus. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus | jackweirdy wrote: | Is the ship of Theseus a single thought problem, or is it a | different thought problem than when it was first thunk since | all the present thinkers are different? | idoh wrote: | That's a funny joke. It does make me think about concepts and | organizations and how they can drift. I don't think the Ship | of Theseus has drifted much, but I think it totally applies | to organizations and who is a member, e.g. people who | supported the French Revolution / a school board / people who | identify as liberal or conservative, etc. | otikik wrote: | One of my favorite ones. It comes to "identity". What does it | mean to "be" (or not to be)? | yakshaving_jgt wrote: | Alternatively, Trigger's Broom. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAh8HryVaeY | [deleted] | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote: | On the other hand, Microsoft was just a BASIC vendor, Amazon was | a bookseller, Netflix was mail oder DVD company. | | Sometimes if you have a really good team/organization it makes | sense to pivot based on the market. | idoh wrote: | Amazon always had ambitions to go beyond books, that's not a | pivot. | Hasu wrote: | Microsoft's BASIC evolved into Visual Basic and still exists as | the .NET platform. Amazon still sells books. Netflix still | operates their mail order DVD company. All three do a bunch of | other things now, but those products allowed the companies to | grow and expand. | | I don't think expanding to other verticals is the same thing as | a pivot, a pivot (imo) is when you entirely change your | business strategy and product because the thing you were doing | wasn't working. If you expand the definition of a pivot to | _any_ change in business strategy, then every company pivots | all the time, and the term loses its meaning. | [deleted] | icu wrote: | Aren't investors really investing in the team talent to find pmf? | In this case, is it practical to advise them to quit? If there's | blood in the streets, it's just time to be a vampire. | e-_pusher wrote: | As always, all advice is wrong. While pivots are difficult to | execute, many successful products came out of pivots like | PowerPoint : | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forethought,_Inc. | cryptica wrote: | It is going to work. I can feel it in my gut. I just need to keep | myself and a few of generations of my offspring working on it for | 150 years or so. Easy peasy. | krallja wrote: | This is the model of Noubar Afeyan's Flagship Pioneering: place | tons of little bets, give them enough money to falsify the | hypothesis. Don't even name the company yet. It's just an | experiment. If it won't work, kill it and move to the next one. | If it does work, call it Moderna and sell a billion mRNA COVID | vaccines. | lakomen wrote: | That is very bad advice. If I did shut evrything down once I hit | some hard opposition, I'd never finish anything. The better | advice is, try, fail, try again util you succeed. Success is | overcoming obstacles. | alx__ wrote: | I think the key part of that idea is learning from the | failures. Analysis and objective opinions on what caused the | failure ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-14 23:00 UTC)