[HN Gopher] What should you do with your stock options during a ... ___________________________________________________________________ What should you do with your stock options during a recession? Author : jrdngonen Score : 30 points Date : 2022-06-15 19:53 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (every.to) (TXT) w3m dump (every.to) | johnchristopher wrote: | I'd like to know what to do with ~10 000 euros, right now. Where | should I put it so it doesn't lose its value and keep a bit with | inflation ? | | edit for a bit of context: Western Europe, renting, unlikely to | be able to buy/invest into a house/flat, looking at gold ingots, | not the nerve for crypto. | senko wrote: | Go through the videos in Plain Bagel and Common Sense Investing | (Ben Felix) YouTube channels, then read, read the sidebar in | r/eupersonalfinance subreddit, and that will give you solid | foundational knowledge and context for figuring out what's best | for you. | nly wrote: | Probably best to just hold on to it. Annual inflation of 10% | sounds awful, but over short periods it's not that bad. | wollsmoth wrote: | I'm not sure if you can buy ibonds but those seem good for up | to 10k usd. | | Otherwise, Either a targetdate fund, I use VFIFX which should | give most benefits of a bull market while giving some cushion | due to its diversification. | | Or, just a nice total market index fund should be a good | option. It may drop a bit but it's as diversified as it gets. I | use FZROX, but there are many others. | bombcar wrote: | If you're not in the US (and Euros sounds European somehow) you | don't have access to I bonds - which would be the safest bet. | Perhaps there is something similar? | notch656a wrote: | It's probably not worth the trouble, but I think anyone can | start a US LLC and use the tax identification of that | business to buy I-bonds. | jonas21 wrote: | No, only individuals can buy I-bonds. | | _EDIT: that 's not right. please see below._ | quesera wrote: | This is not correct. | | Individuals can buy $10K/yr. Married couples can each buy | $10K/yr, and you can buy the same amount for children. | | Also, businesses can buy $10K/yr, trusts can buy $10K/yr, | and you can purchase $5K/yr with a tax refund. | | It would be not unusual to be able to buy $45K/yr | (4-person household), and if one of the family is self- | employed, $55K/yr. | | .... | | That said, don't buy lots of I bonds without first | considering the advantages of TIPS! | jonas21 wrote: | Ah, you're right. I had misread this chart earlier. Sorry | about that. | | https://www.treasurydirect.gov/indiv/research/indepth/ibo | nds... | johnchristopher wrote: | There's something similar but it's in the .9-1.5 interest | rate before 30% off of the interests when it's due. In Europe | I think you can't buy bonds from another EU country but you | can buy eurobonds (which seems to be different but are still | emitted by EU countries). | tmountain wrote: | This is not financial advice, but stocks are getting cheaper | every day. Invest into profitable companies that can weather | the storm. | xiphias2 wrote: | Half year ago it would have been hard tocsay anything, but | right now even the stock market has realistic price. (Btw I'm | in BTC) | JonChesterfield wrote: | Buy something you want for 20000 and watch the debt inflate | away? | adamsmith143 wrote: | This always seems silly to me. You are making an assumption | that your Income will inflate by the same amount. But I don't | know anyone getting 8% raises each year in any industry. | nly wrote: | So the theory here is if you _know_ you 're going to buy a | $20K item in 2 years time, and you _know_ it 's going to go | up in price in that time, you're probably better off | borrowing the money and buying it now. | | The problem of course is we often don't know either of these | things, and having better cashflow, or a pile of savings, now | might help you weather the coming storm. | sakopov wrote: | Equities have been decimated. The housing market is starting to | look like it's next. There is nowhere to hide right now. | swagasaurus-rex wrote: | Thank god? | neilfrndes wrote: | I recommend reading 'The Intelligent Investor'. The book | describes strategies that help you navigate all kinds of | markets. | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligent_Investor. | | As counterintuitive as it seems, the book actually recommends | buying stocks in a bear market since they are priced | reasonably. Warren Buffet's famous quote comes to mind: "Be | fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are | fearful." The book also talks about the importance of long-term | investing and discipline. | ISL wrote: | It may be helpful to think through your intended holding | period. | | As a companion to the sibling comment recommending the | Intelligent Investor (realize that index funds didn't exist | when Graham wrote that), I'd keep in mind the mantra, "price is | what you pay, value is what you get". | | If the holding-period is decades, there are good arguments in | favor of stocks/index funds. Shorter-term than that, it may be | difficult to provide guidance with any real certainty. | FinanceAnon wrote: | I would just hold it - I have sold most of my index fund | holdings in the past 6-9 months and been just holding cash. I | don't think stocks have reached the bottom yet, so holding cash | at 0% return is still better than negative returns from stocks. | Right now, it's about not taking losses. I also don't see the | market and economy rebounding quickly after reaching bottom - | they will stay flat for a while IMHO | atombender wrote: | As a counterpoint, I would quote the great John C Bogle: | "Never, never get out of the market." [1] Knowing when the | market has reached the bottom is not really possible. | | During the dot com crash in 2000-2001, investors sold all the | way down to the bottom (and lots of them sold at the very | bottom), and then they eventually sold all the way up to the | peak, when instead they could have just held onto their | shares. | | Rebalancing doesn't really work. That's another thing Bogle | showed us. | | Of course, if you need the cash, that's another matter. But | then you arguably shouldn't have invested it in the stock | market to begin with. If you have a time horizon less than 5 | years, the market is just too volatile. | | [1] https://youtu.be/1SLb1QJvTvg | ushakov wrote: | > holding cash at 0% | | as consumer prices are surging this no longer may be true | | my bet is on physical assets: guitars, gold, watches | subsubzero wrote: | Gold looks ok, I don't know about guitars but watches are | plummeting just like the stockmarket. | justapassenger wrote: | No one can predict the future. But generally time in market is | more important that timing the market. Works only if you invest | long term. | MrMan wrote: | In web 1.0 mine all became worthless. I went on to do other | things than writing web apps. | mgarfias wrote: | article starts off talking grants, but then is talking about | options. | | Pick one man, they're not the same. | sbf501 wrote: | Cry whilst they expire underwater? That's what I did from | 2000-2005. | ramesh31 wrote: | Hope that we have another toilet paper shortage, so they get some | use. | meatmanek wrote: | This article uses your net effective tax rate to calculate the | taxes on the bargain element -- 32.25% on someone earning $150k | in California. They should be using your _marginal_ tax rate for | that calculation, which would be 24+9.3=33.3% on the first | 170050-150000=$20,050 of the bargain element, 32+9.3=41.3% on the | next 215950-170050=$45900, and 35+9.3% on the rest. | | Or, much easier is to use a calculator like the one they link[3], | and calculate your total taxes on your current earnings, | calculate total taxes on the earnings if you were to exercise, | and then subtract. | | I calculate $81,599-$38,038 = $43,561 in additional taxes, rather | than the $41,893 they said. | | I agree with the author's take on ISOs: | | > It's a bit complicated - and dry - so if you have ISOs you | should probably talk to your tax person | | My opinion on ISOs is essentially that for some middle ground | between "few enough ISOs that you don't trigger AMT" and "so many | ISOs that the potential tax savings are more than big enough to | pay for a financial professional", it's not worth it to try and | exercise ISOs early. | | AMT on ISOs will complicate your taxes for years to come: in some | circumstances, you can recover some of the money you paid as AMT | on the ISOs in future years -- essentially, ISO bargain element | is a specific category of AMT-taxable income which gives you an | AMT credit for future years, which you can recover with form 8801 | [4]. For several years after my ISO exercise, I was able to eat | away that credit by paying the AMT tax amount when it was _lower_ | than my standard income tax. 1. | https://taxfoundation.org/2022-tax-brackets/ 2. | https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/taxes/california-state-tax | 3. https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes#H3aXczXUcM 4. | https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-8801 | jcdavis wrote: | Yet another reason not to join any startup that still does 90 day | option expiration. | TrainedMonkey wrote: | In US 90 day option expiration is required by law for ISOs | which have favorable tax treatment. | jcdavis wrote: | Yes, but grants that convert to NSOs after departure are | possible. Worse from a taxation perspective, but better than | losing them. | anon291 wrote: | I'm planning on exercising some of mine (in the post-resignation | 90 day period) via EquityBee. I don't want to lower my own cash | reserves now due to a looming recession, but do believe the | company has upside. EquityBee (and a few other companies, like | vested, all of whom I think are legitimate) gives me money to | exercise the options in exchange for ~30% of the shares should | the company go public, plus repayment of the original loan. It's | a win-win for me. The worst outcome is I make no money; the best | is that I keep 70% of my shares without paying for them. They | even pay AMT. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _worst outcome is I make no money; the best is that I keep | 70% of my shares without paying for them. They even pay AMT_ | | I don't have the details to be able to say anything useful. But | there might be a narrow window of tax circumstances in which | 70% of the equity without AMT but with loan costs is better | than 100% with AMT + marginal long-term taxes and no loan | costs. (Such schemes make sense if you're concerned about not | being able to exercise your options on short notice after | getting laid off. If you have the liquidity, however, set it | aside, take the yield and hold form.) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-15 23:00 UTC)