[HN Gopher] Life is not short ___________________________________________________________________ Life is not short Author : dbrereton Score : 377 points Date : 2022-06-26 16:02 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (dkb.show) (TXT) w3m dump (dkb.show) | himalayan_yak wrote: | Different take - it is pointless to think life as short or long. | Life just is. You ARE in this moment of conscious time (to borrow | Descartes). Anything else is either memory (history) or future | yet to be. | | You, your 'self' are defined by your memory that is the | consequences of the paths you took and not the ones you could | have, and just like that your future will be the paths you take | in this moment. Some try to make effort to be the best version of | themselves, some try to live in this moment and many are in | between. I do not think there's anything wrong with either | extremes as long as you consciously and willingly do it, and sign | up for the consequences. But.. idk.. I find this 'life is long vs | short' debate a bit besides the point. I mean we do everything to | fit the curve of 100 years of life - first quarter: education, | second quarter: career, start family etc. May be its a perception | thing - you're 40 and suddenly you realize you didn't become the | astronaut you thought you'd be when you're grow up: how quickly | life has passed by. To me personally, framing life as short vs | long doesn't provide much solace in this situation but rather the | one with culmination of past choices does. | giantg2 wrote: | Yeah, there's not a lot of _real_ choices in life once you hit a | certain age /condition. | | Once you get married and have a family, it's basically just | grinding away at work, with chores, etc. Stuff that just has to | get done, or the consequences are catastrophic (divorce, medical | bill bankruptcy, losing the house, etc). | throwaway98797 wrote: | if your kids / wife aren't making you happy maybe you should | reconsider the choices you don't think you have | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | This is the bleakest picture of family life I have ever seen. | | Certainly you have more choices/options if you have more money, | right? | adamdusty wrote: | It is whatever you perceive it to be. Family life is not like | that for everyone, and money is definitely not the only | reason. | adamwong246 wrote: | Not when that excess income goes directly into the kids | mouths. | yieldcrv wrote: | You have more choices if you have more money. Most of the | folly with divorce is still completely avoidable for the | breadwinner (if the couple has one). I won't describe it, | make enough to get your own set of lawyers and ask for the | supporting case law before implementing any strategy. There | are things that work equally as well in community property | states and equitable distribution states. Having your own | assets completely paid for _before_ the marriage is a great | first step that most of the population cannot do and cannot | relate to, so this influences the collective conscious. But | there are also things you can do for assets you paid for in | your marriage to keep as your own. | | Don't apply if you don't have money, and this has nothing to | do with a pre-nup which you should also do. | | The irony, for those about to have a kneejerk reaction about | merely considering the financial realities of marriage | instead of solely the love partnership part, is that this | kind of pre-planning actually allows you to focus on the love | part. You don't have to be skeptical or worried about any | partner or anecdotes because you have it all figured out. | giantg2 wrote: | "The irony, for those about to have a kneejerk reaction | about merely considering the financial realities of | marriage instead of solely the love partnership part, is | that this kind of pre-planning actually allows you to focus | on the love part. You don't have to be skeptical or worried | about any partner or anecdotes because you have it all | figured out." | | That's my basic opinion. My wife and her family had a fit | when I suggested a prenup, even though it mostly followed | the general guidelines in law with the removal of alimony. | It was crying and "you don't know what you're doing" with | not a logical argument in sight. I just wanted a calm, | rational conversation. Instead I feel like I was | emotionally bullied and manipulated. If only I realized it | then. | yieldcrv wrote: | Yeah, on that topic, I wish alimony was modified more | holistically at the state level to avoid this discussion. | | Proponents say "one person does more unpaid labor to | support the breadwinner and the lifestyle they were both | beneificiaries of", but why does seemingly nobody create | a market value of that unpaid labor (feel free to correct | me if I'm wrong). People act like this unpaid labor is | the same value at any amount of money that the lifestyle | costs, when that's not true. | | "You did the dishes most often according to these angry | text messages, and also got to travel to Tuscany in | luxury, so here is $800,000 for 10 years and if your ex | has any disruption in income then they have to check | themselves into jail, if they make more we can modify | that amount upwards and assume their income never goes | down" | | I would like alimony capped at the state level in both | amount and time based on what the value of supportive | household/emotional labor is. | | Monaco's alimony law is a decent rubric. | giantg2 wrote: | That's the problem. It's not even based on unpaid labor. | There are courts assigning alimony to support porn | addiction and other lifestyle factors. If it were based | on unpaid labor, my wife would be paying me for all the | high-rate mechanic, handyman, tech support, accounting, | etc work. By getting married the lower earner is | basically taking possession of your earning potential. | | "You did the dishes most often according to these angry | text messages, and also got to travel to Tuscany in | luxury, so here is $800,000 for 10 years and if your ex | has any disruption in income then they have to check | themselves into jail, if they make more we can modify | that amount upwards and assume their income never goes | down" | | If anyone thinks this is joking, my wife's father was in | an accident and then a coma. Lost his job and obviously | wasnt making money in a coma. Apparently the child | support payments emptied his account. He was arrested for | not paying. He then couldn't find any decent job with the | arrest record. | giantg2 wrote: | Maybe. But usually that means you spend more time at work. I | have two family members with medical issues, so we hit the | out of pocket max in medical bills every year (and possibly | more due to some things being coded incorrectly and nobody | being able to fix it). | | Then there's the fact that you need concensus for things. | Like can we move to another area? No, wife doesn't want to | ever leave the county. Should buy an unaffordable house? No, | that's financial suicide. Wife wants another kid, but also | complains that I don't do enough (not going into it, but | she's way off base). I don't want another kid due to all that | I have to do for the current one and her (she needs help with | many things). | | In theory, we could each pretty much decide these things | unilaterally. In practice, that's likely to result in divorce | even if we have more money. | bwest87 wrote: | > You should organize each day as if it were your last, so that | you neither need to long for nor fear the next day. | | I've come to find this "live each day like it's your last" advice | to be pretty unhelpful. My favorite quote about it is, "all that | goes to show you is some people would spend their last day giving | you stupid advice". | | The problem is that if it actually was your last day, most people | would give the finger to all of their responsibilities and go | party, eat cake, see friends, familiy, lovers, etc. Which is | simply not an actual way to _live_ your life. It 's a way to exit | your life. | | An alternative framing that I've come to find more helpful is to | take your life expectancy, and cut it by 2/3. Now what do you do? | For example, if you're 20 years old and your life expectancy is | 80 (ie. 60 more years), pretend that you only have 20 more, so | you'll only live until you're 40. It's nice cause it naturally | adjusts as you get older. You'll have smaller windows to work | with. | | This approach strikes a nice balance. It gives you enough time to | be able to really do something and change directions if you want. | But not so much time that you can really waste any. It forces you | to ask the hard questions about whether your day to day is truly | connecting with your dreams, and whether you're on a path to get | there. | | Of course, Seneca didn't have life expectancy tables to work | with. But I think he would have approved. :) | YoniMessing88 wrote: | You could live your entire life right. Save money, build a | family, find the love of your life, and have it all come crashing | down in a single instant for any number of reasons. That | terrifies me for some reason. | mib32 wrote: | Hey, but what I should do, if, say, I don't have my own house and | I really need to buy one? How can I just stop doing what I don't | love in that situation? | | Also, what about the situation when one day you really love your | work and find it very interesting and fulfilling, but the other | day it's just the opposite? | claylimo wrote: | I talked with a financial advisor. He said for some of his higher | end clients who have 25 million dollars that are simply sitting | around in investments. The money is doing nothing for them except | accumulate. He advises them to at least spend some of it. | TimPC wrote: | It's interesting how the amount of money involved can change | your perspective. For me the single most important thing to do | with money is save it. Nothing I can buy will give me as much | happiness as being able to help make the lives of important | people in my life easier. We have a broken housing system that | screws over almost everyone who doesn't get help so I want to | save a sizeable contribution to my son's downpayment. I want to | help pay for his wedding. I want to pay for his education. I | want him to have a better start to life than I did and I want | him to have more opportunities than me. I guess once you | accumulate enough money you can do all that and still easily | have more left over for the nice to haves. | jodrellblank wrote: | https://dilbert.com/strip/1991-08-20 | paulpauper wrote: | don't worry. the market decline will take care of that | mjreacher wrote: | I would like to add a comment for a perspective that's a little | different to some of the others here. I'm sure many of you here | are familiar with John von Neumann. He died in 1957 at the age of | 53. Throughout his life he was a busy man, and many times he | deferred doing things saying that he would do them at some later | unspecified date. For example he once said he would write a big | treatise on von Neumann algebras, a technical mathematical | subject of his own creation. However once WW2 started his | interests changed and he became very involved not just in applied | mathematics related to the war, but in consulting and advising | too. By the 1950s the majority of his time was not spent on | academic work, but rather on this latter subject, advising big | important agencies of the US military on various matters. | | Some of his colleagues at the Institute of Advanced Study and in | other places resented this. They said he was wasting his time, | wasting his talent, on this work that could be done by other | people, while his mathematical brain could be doing academic | research that others could not do. Just shortly after being | appointed commissioner of the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), | the pinnacle of his non-academic career, he was diagnosed with | cancer. Within 2 years he would be dead. At the time of his first | diagnosis the main academic subject he was dealing with was his | theory of automata, however at first he was optimistic about his | cancer and continued working heavily on things to do with the | AEC. After some time the doctors made it clear to him that he was | going to die soon, and he should wrap up any affairs that he | wanted to complete quickly before he died. | | Now he panicked, after living his life and having so many | incomplete things he wanted to do he was going to die and he was | running out of the one thing he could not escape from - time. He | tried to finish the topic he was currently working on, the theory | of automata, however cancer affected him quicker and quicker and | he could not. He wouldn't even finish a lecture he was asked to | give - Yale's Silliman lecture, although the lecture he didn't | finish would be cobbled together and published as a book, The | Computer and the Brain, as would his work on automata, which was | edited by Arthur Burks. He had grand aspirations for his theory | of automata, it would be his greatest work, something he created | entirely on his own, combining mathematical logic, information | theory and biology. However, he put other things first, and he | never got to finish it, indeed it seemed like he wanted to write | far more, the book edited by Burks covered only 2 or 3 of the | planned set of 5 lectures, and this was only the first set of | five. | | After he died several of his colleagues again made comments when | interviewed that they felt that his talents were wasted. | Considering his working life was only about 30 years they felt | much of the last 10 years of his life, primarily spent consulting | and working with the government, would be better spent on things | that only von Neumann could do, his treatise on von Neumann | algebras, his work on automata (incidentally, his theory of | automata hasn't really made much progress since he died, | especially in comparison to other fields), many other things that | he worked on for a bit, got interested in other things, and said | he would come back to later. | | I am not sure what conclusion I should make of this, but I hope | this little story is interesting to others too. | ulisesrmzroche wrote: | Ugh Seneca. No gracias. Hard pass. | netr0ute wrote: | I like the article's perspective, but there's a rub. The Juanes | song "La Vida Es Un Ratico" seems to say that despite the best | efforts to not waste time, life is still short (the "ratico" | part). And that was in 2007! | | Unfortunately, I don't think there's much overlap between those | on HN and those listening to Colombian rock. | hebrox wrote: | They used this song in Spanish class I took in Medellin. I | think I'm not the only one who spent some time there and spends | some time here on HN. Don't underestimate that Venn diagram :) | (Does early Shakira count?) | markus_zhang wrote: | It is uncertainty that makes us waste so much time. If you can | focus early in your life, consider yourself lucky instead of | being superior to your peels. | almokhtar wrote: | lwqt klsyf n lm tqT`h qT`k | Tabular-Iceberg wrote: | Would it have killed you to provide an English translation and | maybe a few lines of context? It's especially poor form not to | include an attribution. | mrkramer wrote: | I agree with this; I wasted so much time in my childhood and | teenage years doing nothing and feeling bored. Eventually years | later I realized how much destructive it was for me both mentally | and physically. Children and young people need to be guided in | the early stages of their life because they will be disoriented | just like me. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | I have found that I sometimes need "down time." This may involve | sitting in a recliner, reading junk fiction, or watching vapid TV | shows. | | When I am "on," I am _really_ "on." I like to be constantly | "producing" stuff. I tend to not do much "farting around." All my | work needs to have some deliverable goal. | | It's not necessarily for the best. I probably miss out on a lot | of creative exploration. I'm very empirical. I think that | abstract thinkers may come up with some really cool stuff, and | they may do that, while sitting in a coffee shop, staring | vacantly out the window. | verisimi wrote: | I personally like the idea that, when this life ends we judge | ourselves. | | Of course, I have no idea whether this is the reality. :) | | Regardless, it is a idea that I find motivates me in the here and | now. I don't want to act badly, have regrets, do the right thing, | etc. | tomcam wrote: | t-writescode wrote: | That's gross. | tomcam wrote: | I hate myself | marban wrote: | _Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is | Life 's change agent_ | | -- SJ | endorphine wrote: | I watched this speech some 10 years ago and that quote has | stuck with me. And particularly the subsequent sentence: "It | (death) clears out the old, to make way for the new." | | This is from Steve Jobs' Stanford 2005 commencement address - | https://youtu.be/UF8uR6Z6KLc (at 12:03) | th2398423984 wrote: | Any advice for someone who has not done anything other than work | in the last 15 years (weekends and vacations spent home indoors | etc.)? I spend my free time obsessing how I'm pissing away my | time on this planet and at the same time terrified of doing | something else. | rhexs wrote: | Sure, see a therapist, find out why that is. | heavenlyblue wrote: | Start small and spend your weekend and vacation not indoors? :) | if you are really afraid of getting away from a job then just | bringing some reading material for the job outside could go a | long way | adamwong246 wrote: | Time spent happily is the best possible way of spending it. | Were you happy doing nothing? If so, perhaps it time was well | spent. | justsomehnguy wrote: | Looks like you know what there are some problems (at least in | your POV) with your current life. | | Take a sabbatical[0] and try to understand what do you need to | be a happier person. | | [0] in my case it was a sessions of a late night and beer talk | with a people who doesnt't know me, but was greatly supportive | of my situation (beer hleped there). YMMV. | chaps wrote: | Hm. I dunno about others, but whenever I hear someone say that, | what I hear is that _sections_ of our life are short. Childhood | is short, teenage years are short, early twenties are short, etc | etc. Cumulatively it 's "long", but that misses a lot of the core | point. | czbond wrote: | Fair point - the sections we have to adjust to an be short, | relative to how we figure them out. | | For example, one has to figure out how to be a man in some | period of 15-23yro. Then live that. Then if one has kids, how | to wholly be responsible for others in that 20's-30's range. | Then wholly how to let them go, and then potentially to help | one's parents after that. All while balancing self, identity, | aspirations, dreams, adulting, and placing food on the table. | | Each period is short, in a long overarching "cumulative years" | mcm1053_ wrote: | These are truly my favorite types of articles on HN. | globile wrote: | Was waiting for someone to post PaulG's take on this. So here | goes: | | http://www.paulgraham.com/vb.html | ryandrake wrote: | > It's even worse when people come up with deferred life plans. | They'll say something like "When I'm forty, I'm going to retire | and write a book" or "I'll do this thing I hate right now so I | can make money, then in ten years I'll do what I really love". | Seriously? You think that the universe is going to let your life | proceed the way you want it to? What guarantee do you have of | making it to that age? | | This is often used as a reason not to save when you're young, and | to generally dunk on the the traditional idea of retirement. | Believe this and in a few decades we're going to have a large | number of people aged 80-120 seriously struggling. Apart from a | recent dip, average life expectancy in the US has been going up | pretty much forever. Life is not necessarily long, but it can be. | Yes, you might drop dead of a heart attack the day before you | retire, so all that saving was a waste. You also might make it | past 100. Who among us has enough savings to last until they are | 100? You won't if you're spending every penny you have when | you're young. | | Thanks to compounding interest, the best time to save and invest | is when you are young. A dollar earned and invested when you're | 20 is many times more valuable than that dollar earned when | you're 60. | moonchrome wrote: | >Thanks to compounding interest, the best time to save and | invest is when you are young. A dollar earned and invested when | you're 20 is many times more valuable than that dollar earned | when you're 60. | | And money spent on experiences in 20s can't be made up with | experiences in 60s - plus the kind of experiences you have in | 20s will define the person you'll be in 60s. Hell even in 30s | you can't get your 20s back. There's a biological peak - saving | money for your twilight years might make you safer in the far | future but it's guaranteed to make you miss out on your prime. | | I'm willing to bet investing in yourself early will outperform | the compounding interest you make on income you have at the | start of your career. | wwilim wrote: | Depends on your definition of performance | 8jef wrote: | Exactly. And wonderfully, performance can be anything, by | any measure. My preferred metric: time ratio for which I | get to choose - or agree to - whatever I do. In my case, | pretty much all my time. Because one day I decided to make | my own choices, in regard to time allocations, occupations | and general use of my time. Which means I'm almost never | defaulting to other people's agenda, unless I agree to it. | Everything is a choice, and I make it my own. | adjkant wrote: | > I'm willing to bet investing in yourself early will | outperform the compounding interest you make on income you | have at the start of your career. | | People present this often as a choose 1, but in reality | there's a big gradient of options here. There's no reason you | can't spend some money for experiences in your 20s and also | save a good deal for compounding interest in the future. | moonchrome wrote: | >There's no reason you can't spend some money for | experiences in your 20s and also save a good deal for | compounding interest in the future. | | Well in my scenario (and that of most of my peers/siblings) | income is low and cost of living is a large % - you don't | have a lot of discretionary funds to manage so it usually | is one or the other. | 5e92cb50239222b wrote: | JFYI you're writing from a very privileged perspective. I live | in former USSR. My parents were robbed by the state of their | life savings twice in their life (one day you have enough to | buy a car -- a luxurious item indeed, next day you have | nothing), and thrice their saving were depreciated by 30-60% in | a single day due to shock devaluation of the currency. I think | this is pretty typical for 'developing' countries. | | Most of my Russian friends have been working unofficially and | haven't been paying anything to the retirement fund even before | the war started (which just seems to have proven them right). | dangus wrote: | The article is extremely dismissive toward the real reason most | people waste time. The vast majority of the world is working for | basic subsistence. | | 60% of the world's population does not have a flushing toilet at | home. Hopefully the author's magic wand is a hella good one. | ozim wrote: | Is that article target audience "whole of humanity"? | | That 60% of population is probably not going to read that | article. They will be busy with more important things like | living till next day. | WJW wrote: | Interestingly, Seneca himself most likely did not have a | flushing toilet at home. | cosmiccatnap wrote: | With all due respect, that is total bullshit. | nnoitra wrote: | Yes it is despite what seneca says. | | People obsessed about not wasting their lives are actually the | ones that waste it. | simmerup wrote: | I suspect the only way to guarantee you've wasted a moment is | to spend it in some unneeded state of distress. | | The more moments you spend worrying about whether you're | spending the moment well, the more waste accumulates | nnoitra wrote: | Yes and if naturally wired to worry ceaselessly you need | significant practice to overcome it. | | This world will teach you everything except how to be | peaceful which is the most valuable skill of all. | dinobones wrote: | The good health/good energy/good looking period of life is like | 30 years maximum. I would consider that pretty short. | dangus wrote: | You don't know any good looking 48 year olds? (18+30) | | If you stay thin and keep active, you could probably double | that estimate to 60 years if not longer. | ozim wrote: | Well I am 35 and have good health/energy could drop some belly | fat but I don't care. | | Look at the Hollywood stars 60 year olds looking still good. | wwilim wrote: | A few weeks ago I saw my parents, aged 60 and 61, dance at my | wedding and I would like to disagree with your statement. | spicysugar wrote: | yieldcrv wrote: | > Everyone complains about how short life is, but that | perspective is broken. Life is not short. The real issue is that | we waste so much of it. | | > Life is long enough for you to achieve your wildest dreams. | You're just so busy wasting it that you get to the end without | living much of it. | | Hey guys, what kind of fallacy is this? This observation | presented is saying its not _too_ short to live your wildest | dreams, but isn 't refuting the idea that it is short, which is a | common view of relative time that is shared amongst people. | | My observation is that we can spend too much of it chasing our | wildest dreams, while their observation is that people spent too | much time wasting it (as if that is exclusive from not chasing | their wildest dreams). | | Kind of all points to the idea that it is short, and doesn't | bother refuting the supposition. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | indeed, you could do one or the other, and you could fail at | both. | | in fact for some having a decent place to live is a dream out | of reach. | Trasmatta wrote: | Anyone else been increasingly dissatisfied by Stoicism lately? | It's been super in vogue for about a decade now in tech for some | reason. I've read several books on it, and apply some of the | practices, but there's something that doesn't sit quite right | that I haven't fully been able to put my finger on it yet. | ketanhwr wrote: | Maybe you'll agree with this (really good) argument against | stoicism: https://simonsarris.substack.com/p/stoicism-is-not- | enough | Trasmatta wrote: | Thanks, all those points track pretty well with how I'm | feeling about it. | HL33tibCe7 wrote: | Life is infinitesimally short regardless of what anyone says | sambapa wrote: | Life is the longest thing in life | chasd00 wrote: | "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone | drops to zero" - Fight Club | phabricator wrote: | "Today, men still quote 'Fight Club'" - Peter C. Baker | paulpauper wrote: | or the price of crypto | tourist_on_road wrote: | Looks like the site went down due. you can access the article | here -- https://archive.ph/QQ5iV | sh4rks wrote: | > You should organize each day as if it were your last | | I never understood this. If you live every day as your last, | surely you would only engage in short term pleasures instead of | pursuing longer term hobbies/goals? | leobg wrote: | Perhaps you'll find Nietzsche's ,,eternal recurrence" to be a | better approach to the same question. Which is basically to | ask: | | ,,If I took this minute / this day / this month / this year of | my life... and somebody were to tell me that I had to live it | over and over again, ad infinitum, with everything exactly as | it was, and nothing changed at all... would I be screaming Hell | Yes, or would I be screaming Hell No?" | | To me, it's an appeal not to recklessness or consumption of | short-term pleasures, but to living in integrity with oneself. | Not to take shortcuts which you think you'll somehow be able to | compartmentalizations out of your life. And I think he meant it | also to be applied in retrospect: Whatver you did, and whatever | happened in your life... can you ,,own" it, with all its | apparent flaws, and pains and errors? Are you able to see | yourself, and see your own life, beyond the categories of of | good and bad? Can you, like a good author, take the good, the | bad and the ugly from your past and create something of truth | and beauty from it? | a1369209993 wrote: | > If I took this minute / this day / this month / this year | of my life... and somebody were to tell me that I had to live | it over and over again, ad infinitum, with everything exactly | as it was, and nothing changed at all... would I be screaming | Hell Yes, or would I be screaming Hell No? | | If that argument were actually valid, it would be a fully | general refutation of any possible use of your time | whatsoever. There's a reason the narrative trope of "trapped | in a time loop" contains the word "trapped". | leobg wrote: | 1) You'll die anyway. So what does "make use of your time" | even mean? | | 2) There's an augment to made that anything you do or think | is predetermined anyway, by past, biology and | circumstances. Or, if you prefer, that it's all based on a | fundamental randomness. Either way, that you are more a | symptom of the universe than an independent agent. In that | sense, Nietzsche's thought experiment might actually be | closer to reality than we think. | | 3) How can you possibly know that your life right now is | not actually just such a recurrence? The fact that you | don't know that it is one would be, of course, part of the | script. (Knowing that it is a recurrence would be changing | something. And that nothing will be changed is part of the | premise.) | Ekaros wrote: | Either you are dying. Or you know you will be killed, so why | not waste all the money and other property you have when you | still have a chance... Seems like not really advise you should | follow exactly. | Scarblac wrote: | I see it as, don't postpone the things you really want to do | until some later day, that day may never come. Start on them | now. | layer8 wrote: | Aka don't wait for the right time, because the time is almost | never perfectly right. | jstummbillig wrote: | Nothing to understand. It's poorly worded at best. | | How do you feel about "You should organize each day to be the | best possible prototype for all following days?" | layer8 wrote: | That would imply that all following days have the same | requirements, which is not the case at all, neither in the | short term nor in the long term. | jstummbillig wrote: | It does not. "each day" means you reapply the mantra every | day to the then current state of your life. "for all | following days" is the mechanism which forces you to most | broadly consider the future and not just one day (as is the | issue with "live every day as if it was your last") | __s wrote: | I recently reread Ecclesiastes & on the second reading came | across what people tend to be trying to get at with that | advice. I'll try give it from the Ecclesiastes perspective | | Whatever you go out & gather, is ultimately worthless. So if | you're in a shit mood & thinking that some day this work will | pay off, you'll find that your days are spent in a shit mood & | thinking some day this work will pay off. & then you die & | everything you did doesn't really matter, & you spent your time | in a shit mood. So if instead you find enjoyment in the simple | daily toll, that your work today is essentially paying for the | food you'll enjoy today, then you'll find your days are spent | in a good mood. & then you die & everything you did doesn't | really matter, but at least you enjoyed your time while it | lasted | | So "live it like your last" is a bit hyperbolic, but at least | don't justify your suffering on the idea that life gets better | | To try make sense of "live it like your last", it might be | better said as "go to sleep at peace with your life even if you | were to die in the night" | m3kw9 wrote: | " everything you did doesn't really matter, but at least you | enjoyed your time while it lasted" | | Problem with this statement is that what matters after | someone does really doesn't matter to that person after only | before, also, on a long enough time span nothing will matter | after. Does what most people did 3000 years ago matter? | 10000? A million? I wouldn't chase legacies | OJFord wrote: | I don't think people 'chasing legacies' are generally | concerned with whether 'most people' are remembered, that's | exactly the point isn't it? Standing out? | | A better 'problem' to point out might be the timespan over | which few legacies that are remembered originate. 'I want | to be the Tutankhamen of my time' is all very well, but | there's no reason to think there will even be one. | varjag wrote: | Some people have tamed fire, invented wheel and overcame | population bottlenecks. We don't know their names but their | legacy is profound. | layer8 wrote: | As a counterpoint, if they hadn't done it, someone else | would very likely have done it. Individual artworks would | be a more unique legacy. | Deinos wrote: | Stoicism appears to have had a great deal of influence on | Jewish writing at the time. Have a look at "St. Paul and | Stoicism" if you are so inclined. Interesting paper. | | https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/475275 | | ------------ | | Edited to correct attribution error. | lisper wrote: | Not sure if you meany to imply this or not, but | Ecclesiastes is not Christian writing, it's Jewish. | Deinos wrote: | Dammit, was a mental lapse. Appreciate the correction! | mad2021 wrote: | That's a beautiful perspective. Thanks for your comment. | beebmam wrote: | Fundamentally I think you missed the point of Ecclesiastes. | It is: anything you do is meaningless compared to God, and | you should fear him and therefore do what He has commanded of | you. | | Excuse my French, but this God is a real asshole, and I think | it's best that people ignored these threats. | jdsnape wrote: | God is an asshole if you read a random bit of the Bible in | isolation of the theology/tradition that sits around and | explains it. The way I've heard it explained by people who | have lived this for a long time is a slightly different | angle; which is that the way humans were created means that | the way to be truely happy is to be aligned with God's | will. At the start you don't really know what that is, | which is why we have 'commandments'/instruction, but as you | deepen that relationship it becomes more and more | fulfilling. | throwaway743 wrote: | Whatever happened to the golden rule? Do people really | need instructions on how to not be a selfish ass? | | If this god isn't an asshole then he sure is needy in | getting a ton of people to have a "relationship" with | him/be aligned to his "will" in order for them to be | happy. | jhrmnn wrote: | He doesn't need anything. The statement is that there's a | way to live a good (satisfying) life, the God being the | creator knows that way, and he reveals it to people, who | should follow it (to live satisfying lives) | beebmam wrote: | It is not "to live satisfying lives". It is because God | commands it, and you should fear him.[1] It's very | explicit. | | 1. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesias | tes%20... | jhrmnn wrote: | Well, yes, if you take the whole Bible literally, it's | not very nice and not even self-consistent. But I don't | think many reasonable people do that | edgelard wrote: | cs137 wrote: | This is Hacker News. It is not a place for intricate | theological debate. God is bad, money is good, the | systemic failures of capitalism can be ignored as long as | we get to the Singularity, and we're all going to freeze | our heads and be immortal. | someotherperson wrote: | What you're describing here is Stockholm Syndrome | JKCalhoun wrote: | That's funny but I get what the person you were | responding to means. | yieldcrv wrote: | The last time it is recorded as coming here in the type-0 | state known as "God" was to make an unsolicited gamble | with Lucifer for fun to ruin Job's life just for being | God's biggest fan, a process so egregious even _literal | Satan_ was like "maybe dial it back a bit" | | That species gains its power from attention, and that one | got its competitors killed and won with Abrahamic | religions enjoying uninterrupted popularity worldwide, | and to some, Christians by definition, its chimera spawn | (type-2 state) has cast a perception of love to replace | the history of fear, incongruent with its entire recorded | history until that point. No other supernatural being | aside from God or its current angels did _anything_ with | their supernatural abilities to harm humans in that book. | They were just vilified for not being God or an angel. | Nothing else killed babies if lamb's blood wasn 't | smeared on the door. | | It goes extremely long periods of time of inaction (to | our knowledge), it does not act in the benefit of human | kind and would be better off ignored, or making it an | national security effort to guard against it. | nickthesick wrote: | I'm curious in what you are talking about here. Where did | you get these ideas? | sireat wrote: | You probably know that the ending to Ecclesiastes is a bit | controversial in that it might not have been in the | original treatise. | | It is possible that it was added by an later editor to make | Ecclesiastes suitable for inclusion in the canon. | | https://books.google.lv/books?id=TX9DuDb9hgQC&redir_esc=y | xhevahir wrote: | I don't believe Ecclesiastes presents one central and | unambiguous argument. Like a lot of books in the Bible, it | may well have more than one author, too. | [deleted] | wwilim wrote: | I think you might be taking it a little too literally | beebmam wrote: | Approximately two-thirds of all Americans, including non- | Christians, believe that Christ was literally resurrected | in the physical form.[1] It is terrifying how many people | in the US believe the bible is literally true in every | way. | | 1. https://research.lifeway.com/2020/09/08/americans- | hold-compl... | ziroshima wrote: | I think there have been a series of misinterpretations that | unfortunately result in a lot of confusion and (in my | opinion) completely miss the point of these stories. | | I don't think 'God' is an 'entity' per se, I interpret | 'God' as the reality one lives in. "God is an asshole", and | "Life is a bitch" then become equivalent statements. | Whether or not 'ignoring the threats' posed by 'God' | according to this interpretation is wise is left as an | exercise for the reader. | czbond wrote: | >but this God is a real asshole | | From His/Its/Her perspective, if I had Billions of life | forms I was responsible for on each of millions(?) of | inhabitable planets throughout just this Universe - I'd be | crabby as $hit too. All of them needing constant resources, | continually consuming energy to be used on everything from | pissing it away, to working for money, or in the rare lot - | improving the future of ones species. All while they're | bitter and unhappy. | | And since I was infinite - I had to do that forever for | some odd reason... I'd be bitter. | WJW wrote: | I'm not religious but this strikes me as an odd | sentiment. | | First of all, if God is indeed omnipotent and omniscient | then why would anything that humans can dream up surprise | or annoy God? Surely it is the height of hubris to think | that humans could surprise an omniscient deity. | | Secondly, if you are indeed infinite then even taking | care of billions of lifeforms on millions of planets | would be an infinitely small part of your attention and | thus not worth being annoyed about. | | Thirdly even if would be so annoying to God to take care | of all the species (not that God seems all that proactive | these days) then He can just destroy the universe and be | done with it? | | All in all, I don't think there is a lot of reason for | God to be bitter or upset about anything that humanity | does. After all, it was Him that put these urges into | humans in the first place, so it seems kinda petty to | then be upset about anything they choose to do. | escape_goat wrote: | This. Once one posits the abstract properties of God as | infinite, omnipotent, omniscient, and a priori to all | things, a lot of religious presumptions look like | failures of the imagination. It is trivially obvious that | God is unknowable, that any God one claims to know is | 'another' God placed before the true God. It is literal | hubris to experience certitude about the nature of God, | and there is therefore no exemption from culpability | through the name of God for injuries done to another. | Clubber wrote: | I remember the question of if God is omnipotent, why does | he allow such suffering. I believe this was explained | away by God giving man free will. I'm not a big student, | but I find theology interesting. | SnowHill9902 wrote: | Fundamentally I think you missed the point of Ecclesiastes. | lins1909 wrote: | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | Some long-term investments are not fun, but do pay off. | | As someone who put in the effort for many of these things and | is now reaping the reward, I am certainly glad my past self | got me here. | | Sure, a little misfortune could have led me to a drastically | different state today. | | But as the saying goes: | | > God grant me the Serenity to accept the things I cannot | change, Courage to change the things I can, and Wisdom to | know the difference. | jraby3 wrote: | Great comment. I've always hated that comment but your | phrasing makes so much sense. | throwawayarnty wrote: | Thanks for the clarification. I think the description "live | like your last" needs to be tweaked. | | Perhaps what is more productive is: live your days so that | when you think back on them (let's say at a time horizon of | months), you feel satisfied in what you've done and how | you've grown. | Frost1x wrote: | As with most things in life, I think finding a balance between | the two is most enjoyable. If you only focus on the long term | and plan, unless you have a continuous set of long term plans | set to culminate and actually do, you'll have gaps in your | living experience. You'll always be saving and investing for | that one golden day that you may never see for some reason or | another. | | Meanwhile as you point out, if you focus on living in the | moment only, you'll live on cheap small rewards in life. | | I think a lot of good long term strategy with allotments for | little impulse to pepper life is the best mix, at least for me, | so that's how I live. Every now and then I'll splurge and do | something unplanned a little extravagant but that's because I | already budgeted for that sort of stuff -- my little fun pocket | change time and money. Meanwhile I have nice set long term | goals that improve my overall life experience as I get older. | Some may never happen and that's fine because I'm not living my | life wailing for that special time. | bwest87 wrote: | Ok, echoing my top level comment... An alternative framing that | I've come to find more helpful is to take your life expectancy, | and cut it by 2/3. For example, if you're 20 years old and your | life expectancy is 80 (ie. 60 more years), pretend that you | only have 20 more, so you'll only live until you're 40. It's | nice cause it naturally adjusts as you get older. You'll have | smaller windows to work with. | | This approach strikes a nice balance. It gives you enough time | to be able to really do something and change directions if you | want. But not so much time that you can really waste any. It | forces you to ask the hard questions about whether your day to | day is truly connecting with your dreams, and whether you're on | a path to get there. | | Of course, Seneca didn't have life expectancy tables to work | with. But I think he would have approved. :) | majani wrote: | exactly. If I live till old age, I fully intend on living out | my last days as a drug addict rather than some futile, painful | attempts at curing a terminal illness | gunfighthacksaw wrote: | I imagine my last day is going to be spent hooked up to a life | support machine in a climate controlled environment as various | close people trickle in to say farewell. | | I'd prefer to spend the close of my 20s doing something else | like raving on a warm beach with a bunch of people who don't | know me and won't miss me tomorrow, and hopefully finding one | or two fellow travellers who I can keep in touch with until my | dying days :) | | exploration vs exploitation | lazide wrote: | The real kicker of course, is for many people there is even | more than a few folks coming to visit, especially for folks | who don't do the hard and nasty stuff in like when it's | necessary for others. | hh3k0 wrote: | Whenever I hear/read that phrase, I always picture myself lying | in a hospice bed, hooked up to all sorts of medical equipment. | ergocoder wrote: | This needs to be a post in r/comics | 2arrs2ells wrote: | <nit> The philosophy behind hospice is that you are *not* | hooked up to all sorts of medical equipment. Rather, you only | receive the minimal treatment needed to make yourself | comfortable as you let your illness run its course. </nit> | hh3k0 wrote: | Fair point. I knew that, but my previous comment was poorly | articulated in that regard. I meant something along the | lines of: hooked up to an opioid infusion. | beefield wrote: | > I never understood this | | Me neither. I think there are two distinct possibilities you | should consider when you think what to do today. First one is | that you may die today. Second is that you may not die today. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | so the conclusion is that I should get life insurance and try | all the drugs I always wanted to? | OJFord wrote: | If you have 'always wanted to' try a bunch of drugs.. yes | probably you should (according to that advice). | | The thing to realise is that many people _don 't_ have any | desire to try (the things that we call) drugs, so your | comment isn't exposing some flaw in the advice. | | If an oracle told me it actually is my last day, I'm not | suddenly going to smoke some weed, snort some cocaine, and | shoot up some heroin. I wouldn't want to any more than | knowing (or assuming, as I do) that I'll live until (at | least!) tomorrow. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | You really are sure you wouldn't do anything different if | an oracle told you it is actually your last day? There | are so may possibilities for making the most of it. | | You could take out every bit of loan or debt accessible | and transfer all the money to charity. You could burn | down the HQ of an oil company. | | If you live in a country without the rule of Law, like | Russia, where known killers and criminals hold positions | of power, you could try your hand at assasinating one of | them. | OJFord wrote: | I said I wouldn't do drugs, not that I wouldn't do | anything differently. | xwdv wrote: | It's a dumb statement. Better advice is to live a life worth | reliving exactly the same way an infinite amount of times. | adventured wrote: | > I never understood this. | | You're definitely understanding it correctly. It's atrociously | dangerous advice for any manner of long-term well-being. Humans | can reasonably live to 80-100 years of age. Trying to live even | 18,000 days as your last is psychotic and impossible, it's both | not worth attempting that and harmful to attempt it. Being | healthy requires thinking and acting longer term; building | savings over a lifetime requires long-term thinking; raising | children successfully requires long-term thinking. | | Try raising children one day to the next with the guiding | parental premise being: this is our last day on earth, what | shall we do? It's a recipe for disaster to try to live in | short-term thinking day to day. | | One of our greatest attributes is the capacity to think, plan | and act for the long-term, as many of the things we want | require such. Notice I didn't say everyone thinks long-term | consistently; notice I didn't pretend all of our institutions | think long-term all the time; both are standard issue sarcastic | criticisms against long-term thinking, neither of which | invalidate the value of long-term thinking. | | The correct answer is that some things benefit from (and or | require) short-term thinking (particularly immediate focus), | some things benefit from (and or require) medium-term thinking, | some things benefit from (and or require) long-term thinking. | Where thinking implies the comprehensive (thinking, planning, | acting, etc). | guerrilla wrote: | I think what it means is that you shouldn't procrastinate | anything or think that you can make up for things later. There | may be no later, so just do your best here and now. That of | course includes resting when needed, so it doesn't mean always | be doing something. | waingake wrote: | Read Martin Hagland for a much more applicable take on this. The | primary way we waste time is via waged employment. For this | reason most people have very little control over how they are | spending their limited time alive | https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/05/20/if-god-is-dead... | jcims wrote: | Most of us would be lucky to have 500,000 hours of conscious | thought. | alexalx666 wrote: | DKB.show must go on! | xxxtentacijs wrote: | AMAZING | xchip wrote: | Seneca already said all this 2070 years ago | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Brevitate_Vitae_(Seneca) | nostromo95 wrote: | Literally that's the point of the article. | Mortiffer wrote: | I think it's worth talking to a few people who have master or | phds in Philosophie. From my sample the general rule is that | staying philosophy results in your have a huge set of new | questions but no answers. So i am very skeptical of spending time | on reading more philosophy than i have. | | Just a comment on that second to last paragraph. Rest is good imo | throwaway23234 wrote: | At 35 I decided to fuck the "normal life" and just go RVing with | my wife. We saw the country (US). Fast forward 7 years and we are | now building our own house paycheck to paycheck. It's a beautiful | property. I know there are people on here that have much, much | more and could afford to buy an already existing house. But my | dreams are to have a different kind of life, so in that sense I | am definitely living that. Yes there are mornings I wish I can | wake up and NOT want to install my own well pump, install mini | splits in 105 degree weather, install siding, dig foundations, | run 40 80-pound bags of cement in a mixer, 2 at a time. etc etc | etc... | | But my alternative life would have been spending the last 7 years | playing new versions of Call of Duty and kinda pissing time away. | foobiekr wrote: | two of my uncles did this - plumbers until 50, then RV life for | 20 years, then built houses. as a kid they were my heroes. | older, I am not so sure it worked out, but they had a good time | for a while. | frereubu wrote: | What part(s) of it don't you think worked out with the | benefit of hindsight? | rdudek wrote: | Is it really pissing time away if you're enjoying your time | spent playing video games? While it's great that you found an | opportunity to go RVing with your wife. Because such a feat is | not really possible for everyone to do, less people do it so | less congestion and you can make it enjoyable. Imagine if 100 | million people in the US decided to all at once go RVing around | the country. All the areas would be full of RVs and I bet it | would not be as enjoyable anymore. | FollowingTheDao wrote: | > Imagine if 100 million people in the US decided to all at | once go RVing around the country. All the areas would be full | of RVs and I bet it would not be as enjoyable anymore. | | Yes, I call this the "Dave Ramsey Syndrome". You know, he | wants everyone to save money and not spend it so they can be | debt free and have millions of dollars in the bank. But if | everyone did that the economy, our consumer economy, would | crash. | | And you are right. I have been living in my Van since before | the pandemic. It is impossible to find camping spaces now in | national parks and even the Wal Marts are starting to get | pissed at all the RVs again. These people too, these rich | people, sit out on BLM lands longer then allowed, because it | is free and they could most likely afford an RV park. | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | > I have been living in my Van since before the pandemic. | It is impossible to find camping spaces now in national | parks and even the Wal Marts are starting to get pissed at | all the RVs again | | I've been doing #vanlife on and off since 2012. Camping | spaces in most national parks were already hard to find | most of the time. Municipalities and Walmarts made | overnight parking illegal in their lots in many places | years or even decades before the pandemic. | | What you're describing is real, but not new. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Come on, who would choose an RV park over BLM land? It's | not about the money. | UweSchmidt wrote: | The video game argument represents some kind of fallacy: A | rational actor picks the best form of entertainment which | turns out to be video games - how can that be wrong? | | However, there are many local minima in entertainment and | life and many great things require going through a learning | curve and preparation. Even the greatest couch enthusiast can | remember, say, a magical moment during a pickup basketball | game, and surely those kinds of moments are happening in this | city right now... | jnovek wrote: | Yeah, no. | | I would see a pickup basketball game as "pissing my time | away". I don't like basketball and loathe playing | competitive sports. | | Further, I really enjoy doing things by myself. I often | play video games to challenge myself -- it's me versus a | previous version of me. | | Just goes to show ya -- those "magical moments" are highly | personal and defined by the things that give a person joy. | And for some folks -- like me -- that includes video games! | havblue wrote: | Frankl at least talks about life in terms of the | responsibility you take on in your decisions. So in that | sense video games are less likely to be meaningful than RVing | with your main squeeze. | theptip wrote: | I don't think the point of the parent comment or the OP is | that everyone should RV instead of gaming. It's that each | individual should do what they find fulfilling, now not later | because there might not be a later. | | I think the reply would be: If you get joy and fulfillment | from gaming, do that instead of working really hard to earn | money that you don't need. If you think you'd rather RV than | work & play games, go RV now instead of putting it off for | later/retirement. | izzydata wrote: | "Is it really pissing time away if you're enjoying your time | spent playing video games?" | | It depends on if you ever think you will regret it or not. I | thought the same thing 10 years ago when I was spending years | playing games and having fun. Now it feels like I wasted a | colossal amount of time no matter how much fun it was at the | time. I'd never made that choice knowing what I know now. | qwertox wrote: | Before I started with my daily sports routine, at least one | hour of biking outside every day (unless it's impossible | due to health or schedule, but laziness, tiredness or | season/temperature is not an excuse), I noticed that I have | wasted the possibly best years of my life in front of a | screen. Now I get to pick up what's left over and make the | best out of it. | | I really wish I had started with it when I was in my 20s, | ideally as an early teenager or even kid, when breaking | some bones is not something which keeps you concerned for | many weeks. | | I wish I could drive into the alps and ride the trails, but | I'm currently "recovering" from a crash which ripped a | tendon. In quotes because it can't really be fixed and I | have to see if the system is still usable enough. But it is | enough for having a lot of fun outside. | | Today at 17:00 I was completely tired laying in my bed | after watching hours of a TV series, half asleep and | feeling badly rested, was struggling to motivate me to | ride. But at 18:00 I pulled myself up and went, and I had a | blast during those 1:30 hours, was even making screams of | joy (I ride alone, so it's no show, but a feedback | expression to myself). I was congratulating me for making | the decision to go and ride, had super beautiful views of | the nature at wonderful 27degC (80degF). Dry but planted | fields, juicy green forests, sounds of birds and insects, | breathable, clean air, warm wind being felt by the hairs on | the legs and arms, what an experience. | | I have a lavalier mic attached to my backpack's breast | strap and an app where I can press record, to record notes | of 1 minute length. I will quote you one of the recordings | from today: | | rec60s--1656265743723--19-49-03.q128.mp3: "Well, thank you! | Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you that | you overcame yourself to then get up, go out and ride the | bike, because it was really, really nice! Thank you very | much! It was good, it was worth it, you have to do this, | always, always. Always force you to do this. Regardless of | how weary, how tired, how uninspired, you rode extra. | Extra, because it was so nice. Other ways, new ways, new | trails" | | With "extra" I meant that I had initially decided to ride | my minimum of 23 km in a relatively dull track which I know | I will be able to complete under any circumstances (except | when I have migraine), but then decided to leave the | asphalt, ride up a hill through a forest into some fields, | where I then took this photo. | | https://imgur.com/a/HGQ55kQ | | Maybe I'm a psycho for talking to me like that, but I know | that I switch contexts very hard so that I'm a different | person when I do different things and tend to forget the | experiences. So this was a "thank you" and reminder from | the biking me to the baseline me. Usually I only record new | ideas or things I get reminded of which I forgot. | | I wasn't really sure if I was going to ride today, I didn't | yesterday, because I rode so hard and long distances last | week that by butt was really hurting, and no amount deer | tallow cream (Xenofit Second Skin) seemed to be helping. | But it turned out that I had zero issues with it today. | | Most of the riding time is a relatively hard exercise with | heavy breathing and lots of sweating. No video game will | ever be a replacement for such a thing. | | But I know that I very likely already have my best years | behind me (and lost them to a screen). | picozeta wrote: | May I ask how old you are? | | A very inspiring story. | qwertox wrote: | In the 45-50 bracket. I never did any sports, ate mostly | junk and drank at least 3 L of softdrink a day. I started | riding bike 3 years ago. | picozeta wrote: | Thx! You seem on a good track now, and don't regret | what's past! Anyway, good luck in your future endeavours. | qwertox wrote: | Thanks. The same for you. | drevil-v2 wrote: | Thank you sharing that. It was lovely to read especially | the part where you thank yourself, bought a smile to my | face :) | | It's a great way to think about it. | april_22 wrote: | Really like the idea of having a mic attached to your | backpack to record and listen back to things you | sometimes just say randomly | qwertox wrote: | I already tried to get it transcribed in Google Cloud so | that I could get a summary email with a map, stats and | the recorded notes in text form, but it didn't work. That | was around two years ago, so maybe nowadays it could | work. Also the notes are spoken in German which was bad | back then and have some degree of noise in it (gravel, | wind). | | Edit: I just tested it with the recorder app on my Pixel | 3 (played back via headphones pressed against the phone's | mic) and it was able to transcribe it with almost no | errors, so there is hope. | SoftTalker wrote: | It seems silly to me to regret the past, as it cannot be | changed. It can be used to inform decisions you make | today or in the future, but regretting it is pointless. | tomcam wrote: | Well I don't think you're a psycho for talking to you. | Say hi to you for me sometime. | 888666 wrote: | Could that possibly be a failure on the part of your future | self rather than on your past self? | eikenberry wrote: | Regret isn't an problem with your past, it is a problem | with your current self's opinion of the past. You are | judging your past self based on your current self but that | is unfair and you might want to think how that impacts your | life going forward. Making decisions based on what you | think your future self will approve of doesn't seem like | it'd have the best results. | SamvitJ wrote: | I love this take on regret, and it really resonates with | how I reason about it. | | I wrote a short blog post on the idea of judging your | past self based on your current values: | https://www.samvitjain.com/blog/regret/. Curious what you | think! | rowanG077 wrote: | I vehemently disagree. Making decisions based on your | future self would like is most generally the best thing | you can do. Maybe you should really go out for a run even | though you don't want to. Your future self will thank | you. Maybe you should start working on that thing that is | due soon. Your future self will thank you. And there are | countless more examples. The practically write | themselves. | eikenberry wrote: | None of those are future in a planning sense. They are | immediate goals with immediate impacts. Getting exercise | regularly pays off almost immediately and continues to | pay of day to day. Finishing a project today has the | immediate reward of finishing it and not having to worry | about it anymore. The example was your 10 year from now | self. And while you might come up with some 10-year span | anecdotes, I don't see it being a good heuristic for | living your life in general. | rowanG077 wrote: | They are definitely future planning things. IF you don't | go for a run now you won't notice tomorrow, you won't | notice in a week. You won't even notice in a month. But | compare a person who is 50 who was active for his entire | life and one who isn't and the differences can be stark. | wruza wrote: | Can't we say that an inactive person just lived through | their life quicker because they didn't spend time on | these activities? Absolute years of life isn't a | meaningful metric here, imo. | cgriswald wrote: | The examples you've given here are both extremely short | term _and_ are presumably things that help you achieve | goals now-you wants. | | I know what I want for myself in five years. I don't and | to large degree _can 't_ know what me-in-five-years will | wish I had wanted. | | My approach is to go for the things I want for myself | now, while always being cognizant of providing options | and opportunities for the future. It's not perfect, and | it never will be because I don't have perfect foresight. | But it works well enough. | [deleted] | orobinson wrote: | Interesting. I was very into PC gaming in my teens and look | back on that time quite fondly. Certainly not with any | regret or a feeling that I wasted my time. | chrischen wrote: | I think the key here is the regret. Is playing games | alone, or with friends really that much different from | some other activity, such as traveling, alone, or with | friends? Sure you learn while traveling, but also get | good at gaming the more you do it. You can even | substitute traveling with some other hobby (playing the | guitar, building legos, etc). Some may argue that the | guitar is a "useful" skill but I'd argue that gaming can | be a useful skill in the same sense. | xhrpost wrote: | Same. If anything, my teen gaming years may have helped | get me through school. | SoftTalker wrote: | Because there isn't that much else to do as a teen. The | opportunity cost of spending time on gaming is low. You | _could_ get a job and start saving or investing, or study | harder and advance your education more quickly, but it 's | not the expectation that teens will do this in a | significant way. | | An adult who is free to do anything and chooses to spend | a lot of time gaming has a higher opportunity cost and a | higher likelyhood of regret later. | FalconSensei wrote: | > You could get a job and start saving or investing, or | study harder and advance your education more quickly | | I see this more of a waste of teenage years time than | playing videogames with friends | WoodenChair wrote: | Learning responsibility? Learning how an organization | functions? Perhaps learning a skill at the job (customer | service, mental math, cooking, etc)? A waste? | pharrington wrote: | > Learning responsibility? Learning how an organization | functions? Perhaps learning a skill at the job (customer | service, mental math, cooking, etc)? A waste? | | but enough about being in an MMO guild | whiplash451 wrote: | Same here. If you're saying "that time I spend gaming was | wasted time", you'd better have a really good story about | what you would have done instead, excluding any kind of | hindsight magic. | ajmurmann wrote: | There are a ton of low-effort forms of entertainment | available today. It's easy for them to dominate choice. | If you take those away, other things will emerge and grab | your interest. If you are even a remotely interested | person you'll find stuff. A few months ago I was at the | beach without as much technology access and enjoyed it so | much that I put myself on a media diet after. I suddenly | felt more excitement about programming projects I had | started but not finished, reading books, cello practice, | little projects around my house and garden. One thing all | these things had in common is that they left be feeling | better when I was done with them. That just doesn't | happen for me with most video games and movies. But it's | just so much easier to fall into the couch and watch | Netflix or grab the controller. | wruza wrote: | I really think this thread has to specify the types of | video games it speaks about. Because games range from | CoD-like X-to-Win shooters with endless changing | backgrounds to something more elaborate and harder than | real life activities, while being relatively short. | april_22 wrote: | I don't think there's anything bad with gaming in your | free time - at any age. In the end, why shouldn't one | just enjoy whatever life's possibilities are? It's | obviously important to keep all other areas of life under | control, but what's bad about enjoying doing something - | even if it's not productive - especially when you're | young. This is quite philosphical, but I've found the | idea of optimistic nihilism very helpful for having an | overall more relaxed view on life | https://you.com/search?q=optimistic+nihilism | Aeolun wrote: | > I thought the same thing 10 years ago when I was spending | years playing games and having fun. Now it feels like I | wasted a colossal amount of time no matter how much fun it | was at the time. | | I don't think you should blame yourself for 'wasting' that | time. I'm sure past you would have considered it a waste to | do what you do now. | | There's many things I may wanted to do differently, but I'd | never actually do so since they brought me where I am now. | ge96 wrote: | There is also that aspect where doing the same thing | everyday makes time seem short. Versus doing something new, | which yeah do you have the money to take a vacation. | | Everytime I finish a project I ask myself was it worth it. | It's like buying a new device, you want it until you have | it. | kingkawn wrote: | Yes, it is. | whiplash451 wrote: | I don't think his/her point is that we should all live an RV | life. I think the point is that we should all try to live a | fullfilling life. For some of us, it's going to be in an RV. | For a lot of us, it could be in a very classical apartment | building. However, what you do in this apartment building is | (almost) entirely up to you. | somenameforme wrote: | I'd say there's two elements to fun - how you view it in the | immediate, and how you view it further down the road. And | given that the further down the road part is something that | sticks with you on the order of decades, while the immediate | part tends to be on the order of hours, it seems clear to me | which should be given priority. | | For instance that's why I quit social media (excepting | intermittent HN). I really enjoyed it in the shortrun, but I | wasn't happy with what I was getting out of it in the | longrun. We all convince ourselves we're making an "impact" | by expressing ourselves, but I think that's something we all | know is just a self delusion - we're just one voice ranting | alongside a billion others doing the same. By contrast I've | also spent tens of thousands of hours dedicated to chess, and | it feels extremely good in both the short and longrun. | hungryforcodes wrote: | Though to be fair the economy would adapt to 100 million | people RVing. Services would pop up, new taxes would be | created I'm sure for driving x number of kilometres per year, | etc, etc. | | I agree with your first point though. Perhaps the OP doesn't | think playing COD is a great way to pass the time -- but | video games are certainly not a waste of your life if you | really enjoy them. This applies to any hobby. | | Ultimately we have a short time here and it's up to us | personally to decide what is a waste of our time and then act | accordingly. Judgement on these efforts is hardly effective. | RVing with my wife sounds like an incredibly suffocating | experience -- trapped with another person in such a small | space -- akin to buying a boat and spending 3 years | "sailing", without seeing land for many days on end -- just | figuring out what to do with the day when you wake up. But | some people yearn for it, and that's great. | oneoff786 wrote: | I suspect a lot of competitive multiplayer games are pyrrhic | in retrospect. That is, not necessarily fun to get there but | with a promise of fun when you're at the top, but most people | never really get there and so it was just kind of a waste. | Especially games where you mostly play strangers and never | really see them again. | hinkley wrote: | It is. Or at least it is for a lot of us. In working through | some things a few years back I realized that when I'm worn | out I do certain activities to recharge myself, and some of | them aren't actually recharging, they're just running down | the clock and Time is doing the recharging. | | Gaming was very much a pastime rather than a recharging time. | Worse, with games it's too easy to get sucked into a thread | that keeps me up well past bedtime, in which case I'm more | tired then next day, not less. | | Other hobbies accumulate progress, and are sometimes more | open to participation by friends and family. Now I spend a | lot of time gardening or doing other hobbies, and more of my | screen time comes when I'm resting or trying to limit my skin | cancer risks (1 pm instead of 7 pm). | theptip wrote: | I like your phrasing here a lot. I have come to a pretty | similar realization recently. For me a small about of | gaming does recharge me, but as you say it's really easy to | get sucked into spending too much time and ending up tired | or sacrificing other recharging activities like exercise | and socialization. | | I think it's possible to weave socialization and | accumulated progress into the gaming experience and have it | be a fully enriching hobby. But many (most?) single player | experiences are just a pastime for me, as you say. | BonitaPersona wrote: | Regarding that last sentence, it's the exact opposite | experience for me. | | I see multiplayer experiences as just a past time, and | singleplayer experiences the one that can have a meaning | and are valuable by themselves. | | I think the key point here is what singleplayer games are | we talking about, because the offer is more varied than | ever. | hinkley wrote: | When I was young I realized I was escaping into games and | damaging my life and relationships (one of the tests for | addiction) and so I'm always going to hold them at arm's | length. | | When I realized I needed a change I latched onto the fact | that most people wouldn't understand my excitement for an | accomplishment in a video game, it wasn't something I | could bond with people over. But if I stopped fucking | around and put that energy into programming, I could have | accomplishments people understood (that turned out to | only be only partly true. I still have programming | accomplishments that my peers and communities don't | understand). | | Bonding over games has shifted a bit since then. I know a | hard of hearing kid who socializes online because | conference calls make everyone have the same problem: | differentiating two speakers is difficult. Everything | sounds like hearing aids sound. | | But it's still easier for people to comment on my garden | than whether I have finished the Thieves guild or | stormcloak quest line in Skyrim, as an elf. | Aeolun wrote: | > But many (most?) single player experiences are just a | pastime for me, as you say. | | By this measure reading books would also just be a | pastime? I see gaming more like an interactive story | (especially singleplayer). | wruza wrote: | But why is socialization recharging and "pastime" not? My | bet is because the former allow you to talk through the | issues. | TaupeRanger wrote: | I think Seneca would roll his eyes at most of these | responses TBH. Who cares if you're just gaming to "pass | the time"? When you're gaming, you're having fun and | enjoying your life _in the moment_. It 's only afterward | when you start the cycle of criticizing yourself for not | doing something "productive" with that time that the | negative feelings enter. In fact, the whole exercise of | feeling bad about yourself for playing a fun game and | relaxing is exactly PART of the problem Seneca talks | about - unless your gaming habits cause you to destroy | your links to other important sources of joy and health, | you shouldn't feel bad about having a fun "pastime" | activity, that is just as valid as keeping a garden or | reading a good book of fiction. | philosopher1234 wrote: | Is drinking? | | It's easy to delude yourself. | ta988 wrote: | This sounds like a fallacy to me. If everybody wanted to go | see a concert, most people wouldn't get a seat. If everybody | wanted to fly tomorrow etc. The good thing in the world is | also that bit everyone dreams of the same thing. | Xeronate wrote: | I'm going to add a second data point of deep regret over time | spent gaming and playing sports in high school and college. | They contributed negatively to my life and put me so far | behind where I could have been socially and intellectually | which are things older me cares about immensely and it is | unfortunate that I wasn't able to consider the future when I | was younger. The idea that all leisure activities are equally | valuable is a fallacy in my opinion. | paulpauper wrote: | Playing video games and surfing the web for fun, living with | friends and family instead of having a large family and a | consumerist lifestyle, would have a smaller footprint | NikolaNovak wrote: | It depends on the game. | | Not facetious - for me it's all about whether you build | memories,and whether you'll regret time later. | | Mass effect, deus ex, back in the day Another World or | Sierra's space quest and Rama etc - these are important | memories and experiences to me. | | Overwatch (nearest call of duty analog I played, maybe), let | alone all the phone games, are just time killers in the sense | I do them to pass the time. They are games I actively regret | playing moments, not even years after I'm done. | progman32 wrote: | Precisely this. Mass Effect in particular triggered some | deep introspection that measurably improved my life. I | suppose it's just like other forms of media. Some books are | just time wasters, while others are deeply meaningful to | their readers. And there's overlap in those groups. | caymanjim wrote: | I live my life in a similar way, at least at times. I decided | decades ago that I didn't want to work five days a week taking | two vacations a year for 20-30 years and then retire | comfortably. | | Every few years, I take a lot of time off. Months, sometimes | over a year. If I plan well, I have money saved and I travel. | Every time I do this, it sets me back financially; sometimes | I'm completely broke before I start working again. I'd be well- | served to balance it a little better, and only blow half my | savings before going back to the grind. It's not easy for me to | find that balance, and sometimes it's a real struggle. | | I have a knack for poor timing (left a job right before the | 2001 dotcom crash, left a job right before the 2008 recession, | and left my latest job just now, when there appears to be a | recession looming). I'm about to set off on a months-long RV | trip, and for once I expect to have a decent amount of savings | left at the end, and plan on buying a house some time next | year. While I like my itinerant lifestyle, it's time to secure | a base of operations, too. Something modest, so that it won't | prevent me from doing another trip like this in a few years. | | It's not for everyone; I get that. I don't think it's a better | lifestyle than working hard and retiring in comfort. It's | better for me, though. | | You're only your current age once. If you wait until you're | old, you won't have the same experiences. I'm not willing to | deny myself these moments along the way in return for a | potential future payoff. So many people die before they get to | enjoy the fruits of their labor. It's possible to work full- | time and simultaneously live a fulfilling life; I see plenty of | people do it. I don't know where they get the energy, though; | all I can manage while working is TV, video games, and | infrequent weekend activities. Most of the time I feel like all | I do is work. Big breaks are what keep me sane. | paulryanrogers wrote: | Do people who do this have kids? | JKCalhoun wrote: | Did the kids -- nest is empty -- time to switch gears on | life and live the way I have wanted to for a long time | (second best time to plant a tree and all that, you know). | badrabbit wrote: | Good for you for chasing your dream | foobarian wrote: | I'd love to read the exit interview of your kids when they get | to 30. Did anyone else go through this with their parents? | Would you/are you changing anything as a result? | saiya-jin wrote: | 2 words for the path in the middle (sort of, at least for me) - | adrenaline sports. I don't say which exactly should work for | likes of others, that's kind of unique to each of us. For me | its climbing, paragliding, skiing/ski touring, a bit of | alpinism. Plus diving when near corals, also serious hiking. | | Apart from making me properly happy (and some of those are | easily post-work ones if you don't have kids, like climbing or | paraglide depending on your place), they keep me amazingly fit, | which is source of long lasting content from oneself. Vacations | spent backpacking in crazy exotics (mostly south east asia) | help too. | | I can do boring and uninspiring software dev office job that | pays the bills and some more (seldom intertwined with nice | creative part when actually solving interesting problems, | rather than drowning in processes and politics). It doesn't | dent the content/happiness part a slightest bit. | | Also numerous side effects - one starts eating healthier. Any | kind of gaming addiction I had before was cured too, now its | just waste of life that repulses me (not making critique - if | that's your real kick I guess go for it, but I can't anymore). | | There is one slight problem with this, although it otherwise | worked me 100% for past 10 years - if you get kids and are not | utter sellfish a-hole, you will lose most of this, at least for | some (long) time. Positive side is, one day you will be one | hell of inspiration for them. Other source of issues is | accident - time off everything, for longer, can be depressive. | | Talking as proud parent of two small kiddos who exhausted me | during WFH to max, and who after 4 month recovery of messed up | wrist broke his foot in kindergarten and is on crutches at | least for next 6 weeks of amazing summer. I think right now the | lowest point in my whole life so far due to all above. But that | means it will only go up, eventually. Life is funny. | unemphysbro wrote: | Are you me? I've been slowly getting into alpinism in the | Sierras and looking into getting my p2 cert. (I'd love to | combine the two...imagine climbing in the palisades then | paragliding or base jumping off ) | | I regrettably spent my 20s in academia and now I'm in tech | and actually afford these hobbies. I'd love to have kids but | I'm pushing it off because as you mentioned, it seems | selfish. | | I'm thinking about a SEA climbing holiday during the winter. | I'm eyeing Vietnam. Do you have any favorite locale? | xur17 wrote: | I started getting into skiing a few years ago, and within the | last year have started climbing. I seriously enjoy it, but | how do you get over the constant fear of a permanent | debilitating injury? I've mostly rationalized this away by | doing everything I can do stay safe (equipment, partners, not | pushing the limits too hard), and realizing that life is here | to be lived, but still.. | whiplash451 wrote: | Kudos for living this kind of life. Inspiring for all of us. | nnoitra wrote: | are you happy? | IncRnd wrote: | Not the OP, but I did something very similar with my wife and | daughter a few years ago. Each day was more enjoyable than | the last, especially with the RV. That was the most enjoyable | time, and that enjoyment came from just existing and taking | things as they come. There was never any monotony. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | I'd replace happy with content there. | | Happiness comes and goes. Contentment runs a bit deeper and | gets at it what this article talks about. | iasay wrote: | Definitely subjective. Sounds like hell to me. But i respect | anyone with enough energy to actually do something. | nnoitra wrote: | People are so jealous of what you wrote lol. | FollowingTheDao wrote: | You are just living your own meme. You got into RVing when the | whole meme was taking off, #Vanlife! You were told you want a | different kind of life. All the people not living your | "different life" are working at the jobs you left and are | supplying you with the things you need to live a "different | life". | | And you all talk about "wasting life" like at the end when you | die you get to do something with it all with all the time you | did not waste. You are still pissing time away, all you did was | give your self meaning and that makes it feel like you are not. | | "True happiness is to enjoy the present, without anxious | dependence upon the future, not to amuse ourselves with either | hopes or fears but to rest satisfied with what we have, which | is sufficient, for he that is so wants nothing. The greatest | blessings of mankind are within us and within our reach. A wise | man is content with his lot, whatever it may be, without | wishing for what he has not." -- Seneca | throwaway98797 wrote: | Seneca also lived in comfort, so do as I say not as I do | nnoitra wrote: | Why so jealous though. | s5300 wrote: | Probably has something to do with how much time he's spent | "following the DAO" | JKCalhoun wrote: | Certainly not the response I expected from someone | following the Tao. | FollowingTheDao wrote: | Why? | eikenberry wrote: | Where do you get jealous? | FollowingTheDao wrote: | Oh pay this comment no mind. | | I have found that people who are greedy will often lob | this comment at people who expose the truth and | foolishness of their greed. It is the only way they can | tell themselves that what they are doing is the correct | way to live and anyone who criticizes them is just | "jealous". | throwaway98797 wrote: | i get bitterness not jealousy | | don't worry, be happy | IncRnd wrote: | "For men in a state of freedom had thatch for their shelter, | while slavery dwells beneath marble and gold." -- Seneca | tima101 wrote: | Similar story here. We traveled with my wife for 3.5 years. | Then we built homestead on 30 acres of forest land in rural WA. | Now I am 36 and we bought land in HI to build our second | homestead. And it is from scratch again! Most of our income | comes from freelance gigs. The last time I visited big city was | over 10 years ago. No regrets here. | | I think the best framework is to not compare yourself to | others. And fear of change is a normal, ordinary feeling. | Comparing to others makes no sense, just try to do things that | YOU will not regret and things that make you happy in long | term. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Yes, but we are comparing ourselves to you right now and | feeling the wanderlust. | foobarian wrote: | How does raising kids work in this kind of regimen? How do | you ensure they have a big social pool available to build | peer relationships? | tima101 wrote: | No kids for now but we are making plans. My wife is younger | than me and we are planning to have kids in the next 1-2 | years. Before we have kids we will decide and settle in one | place. We will probably keep our second homestead since we | are emotionally attached to it. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Love to hear any thoughts you have on homesteading in | Washington state. Specifically, areas you think are good. | | For some reason I am attracted to the south-eastern area that | is drier. Forests say "fire" to me (and I also love the sun | too much to be "enclosed" by a forest). | | North and/or high altitudes say "cold" to me. | tima101 wrote: | Yes, we are North-East, not far from Canadian border. A lot | of snow, cold winters. We haven't lived in SE WA but | visited the area you mentioned 3-4 times. The area between | Pullman and, say, Kennewick. Way fewer trees, lower | altitude but winters are less cold and less snowy. I would | say there is no perfect place. Once you checked your main | checkboxes, paradise is a state of mind, not place itself. | You will have hot summers. We are at higher altitude, I | have tractor primarily for snow but summers are much | cooler. And we like cooler summers. This June was mostly at | 68-75F, our german shepherd and I love it. I talked to a | person from Texas and he mentioned 90-95F in May and | 95-100F in June - no, thank you very much. We even bought | land in HI at 3000 ft elevation to have 75F in summer and | 72F in winter for the same reason. | | South-East WA will have hotter summers, no shade from trees | and every time we visited it was windy. having said that | rolling hills are beautiful, farmers are nice, some healthy | rivers for fishing. Pullman and Moscow have shopping and | amenities. | tomcam wrote: | Fantastic, and congratulations! We did roughly what you're | doing but backwards, and still had a lot of fun doing it. | | However, I'm deeply envious that you can just drill a well. I | live in Seattle, where drilling the well requires that you blow | the mayor, bribe an inspector or two, buy what they call | "mitigating" land someplace else in the state, and sacrifice a | goat. And after you found a suitable plot for the well, a $1 | million drill has to be towed onto the property to make sure | ground is preserved. | | Where are you living this beautiful life of you're? | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | Drilling a well _in the city of Seattle_ ? Why would anyone | ever do that? | tomcam wrote: | Technically rural Redmond, a neighboring city. I bought | some of the vanishing farmland. | selimthegrim wrote: | Not sure you can technically blow this mayor but I digress | tomcam wrote: | I may have indulged in a wee bit of hyperbole | poulsbohemian wrote: | Head east. Or west. There are lots of wonderful places | outside the I-5 corridor where I would argue our quality of | life is _at least_ on par. Different, and perhaps with fewer | economic opportunities, but nonetheless a very high quality | of life. | aaraujo002 wrote: | Life is short in a sense that I know I won't have time to learn | about everything there is to learn. I won't have time to study | and understand the proof of Fermat Last Theorem, the latest | breakthroughs of physics. I won't be able learn piano like a | professional or violin. I know that I won't have time to read | many classic of literature, etc. I can choose to do certain | things but now I have to choose where to focus my time. | zandjager wrote: | This is giving me a bit of a Zizek-ian "wisdom" feeling. E.g. in | "Putting things off for the future is the biggest waste of a | life. You deny yourself the present by promising the future." one | can make the counter-argument of the entire marshmallow | experiment with children where the whole point is to actually put | things off for the future! | adamwong246 wrote: | I've found you have to balance the 2 sides- saving for the | future while enjoying the present. Doing both at once is not | impossible. | scottLobster wrote: | Yeah, those who refuse to bargain with the future end up the | same as those who refuse to bargain at car dealerships. They | pay the worst prices. | | Even hunter gatherers sacrifice for the future. I haven't read | much Seneca, but this article strikes me as a shallow | interpretation of him just from its Instagram-quote-ey notes | that are thrown in every now and then | sethammons wrote: | I've always liked the marshmallow experiment, but it turns out | less clear than we may have thought. | | If a child trusts the adult will be back shortly with | marshmallow in tow, they may wait. But if adults in their lives | are less predictable, they may reasonably choose to eat the | marshmallow before the adult returns. | | The marshmallow experiment may show that kids that can trust | adults do better in life. | adamnemecek wrote: | Life is short because society takes so much of it. School wastes | so much of your time, employment likewise. Some sort of drastic | change is needed.oog | randomsearch wrote: | Yes, looking back I cannot believe I did not just walk out of | high school each day. I could have headed to a library and | learnt a lot more in a fraction of the time. I could have | become incredibly physically fit with the remaining time, or | improved my guitar playing. | | I guess I just didn't have the confidence to think - well, | actually, this _is_ stupid and walking out is a smart thing to | do. | derbOac wrote: | Yes these kind of discussions are often useless to me because | they ignore the things in life we don't choose. They're written | as if someone has complete agency and is just choosing between | easier and less reward versus harder and more reward. For me at | least the real difficulty is dealing with broken systems and | all that's needed of you from them, when rejecting the system | can mean complete failure of the worst kind. | | People don't let others steal their time because they're weak, | it's because the system is so broken. | | It's not so much "do I put this effort into building a ship and | charting new territory" it's "do I chart this ship into pirate- | infested waters when then outcome could mean death, and | shipbuilders are defrauding people about the safety of | materials?" The correct analogy in contemporary society often | isnt builders or explorers, it's refugees. | | Yes I'm cynical. I wish I weren't. | Dudeman112 wrote: | Life is short because of senescence | | If only as a society we could put some effort into that instead | of pretty much everything else for a little while. If we solved | anti-senescence we'd have all the time in the world to fix | everything else | andi999 wrote: | Society can only give what it takes (from you and others). | scsilver wrote: | I dont think that is true, society can create value from | trade and good organization providing more resources to | everyone for collectively the same amount of work. | andi999 wrote: | In the sense that the whole is more than the sum of its | parts? Of course! | sethammons wrote: | No synergy to be had? | adamnemecek wrote: | This is incorrect. | ozim wrote: | I really like how society provides libraries/internet - well | you still have to spend some time on banal things like learning | reading or filling in forms in writing to have access. | | School is also useful to learn about mistakes or shitty things | people did in the past so you don't do the same in your life. | Without society you would not have access to great minds of the | past which might be even more useful. | | Unless you know you are kind of prodigy that without learning | reading or writing you could build modern washing machine from | raw materials available in your area. | | My point is that school is just a baseline for living in a | modern society. | | If you by any chance live in a first world country maybe you | should be ashamed of yourself. Maybe you should watch some | documentary about how barely literate people struggle in 3rd | world countries and how much of their life is wasted on meeting | basic needs and they did not have time to attend the school or | there was no school available at all. | randomsearch wrote: | They're not saying "don't educate yourself and take advantage | of your privileges", but "school as we know it sucks and I | could have done a lot more with the time." At least, that | seems like the generous reading. | adamnemecek wrote: | It also takes fucking forever and it gets you nowhere. | groffee wrote: | 692,040 hours. That's short. | glouwbug wrote: | Not when you're constantly assigned backlogged busy work JIRA | tickets | throwawayarnty wrote: | The days are long but the years are short. | | It's all about time scales. | jodrellblank wrote: | "People overestimate what they can do in a day and | underestimate what they can do in a year" ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-26 23:00 UTC)