[HN Gopher] Reading Ourselves to Death ___________________________________________________________________ Reading Ourselves to Death Author : MindGods Score : 55 points Date : 2022-06-26 16:57 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.thenewatlantis.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.thenewatlantis.com) | PKop wrote: | Author talks of text as abstraction compared to "edited" version | of reality of visual media. But videos, movies, TV shows are also | abstractions, possibly worse in that they more easily trick our | subconscious into perceiving them as more real than words on a | page while still being constructions of a "reality" based on the | creator's point of view. So people think they have an | understanding of the world based on fictionalized entertainment | and tropes they've experienced thousands of times from screens. | | Think of any time someone makes a political argument, or comments | on a particular aspect of human nature by referencing something | they saw in a movie. I think this is odd, at least if over done, | as if the constructed media representation is somehow evidence of | anything true. As if people don't have to have real lived | experience of some phenomena as long as they watched something | about it in a show or whatever. | | Reminds me of Baudrillard's "hyperreality" [0] concept, where | constructed media becomes "more real than real", here's an | excellent presentation summarizing the idea [1] | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality | | [1] https://youtu.be/2U9WMftV40c | DiggyJohnson wrote: | Really well put, especially in regards to the notion that the | less obvious mode of abstraction of visual media increases the | risk that we mistake it for reality. | | You're right, the written word or visual depiction is still the | result of human intentions, and I don't think the process is | very different between the two. This is coming from a writer's | perspective, so I guess I will state my bias. | hprotagonist wrote: | _" If there is no Torah study, there is no worldly involvement; | if there is no worldly involvement, there is no Torah study. ... | If there is no flour, there is no Torah; if there is no Torah, | there is no flour."_ | | It's good to walk in the world. | togaen wrote: | themadturk wrote: | I had a friend tell me the other day they're amazed at the number | of "important films that everyone has seen" that I haven't seen. | I told them, a person who endlessly views TV series and movies | that while I enjoy those media, my primary media is written, not | video. I can read a book for hours at a time, but unless I'm in a | theater, I'm always checking how much longer the thing is going | to play, no matter how much I'm enjoying it. | | Doomscrolling anything...Reddit, Twitter, even HN...can be a | waste of time, and of course I've done it many times. But I've | never felt I lost anything while reading a book. I'm one of those | people who read the back of cereal boxes when I was a kid. | Getting drawn into a text-based fictional world may be an | abstraction, but I'll take it anytime. | nonrandomstring wrote: | Nice riff on Postman's "Amusing Ourselves to Death". The focus is | really on the danger of over-reliance on one faculty. But I | suppose the same could be said for an aural-only world of radio | and podcasts. I disagreed that video would be an edited | "reality". Image is no more than the way the world _looks_ as | opposed to how it sounds or is described by text. Ultimately the | ability to synthesise these faculties is what the phrase "common | sense" really means. It isn't a stand-in for "bleedin obvious" or | "what most (common) people think", it is that sense that emerges | from an ability to create a world from sights, sounds, smells, | tastes and also written words, so pf course I do agree that an | over-reliance on any one mode of perception leads to minds that | lack common sense. | parmenidean wrote: | Somewhat ironic given I suspect Postman would disagree with the | majority of this article. This article asserts that the amount | of engagement with the written word has gone up dramatically; | "Amusing Ourselves To Death" has an entire chapter dedicated to | demonstrating how much more early Americans engaged with | written work. Consumption of books per capita was far higher in | the 18th century than it is today, the literacy rate for men in | some of the colonies was ~92% (and for women 62%), the number | of people who read Common Sense on a per head basis is roughly | equivalent to the number of people who watch the Super Bowl | today, etc. | | The argument in "Amusing Ourselves to Death" is not that the | written word enhances reality, it is that it engages critical | faculties by forcing the reader to contend with the argument | advanced by an author. This article suggests that the written | word is a crutch for thought, and thereby diminishes our | ability to get at reality. These ideas are not exactly opposed, | but there is a certain discordance. | lustforleif wrote: | When Postman refers to written word he refers mainly to | books. The article mentions the increase of hours spent | reading text as a result of texting, social media etc. This | form of written word is actually close to Postman's concerns. | | It's written word, but its metaphor is the same as the | metaphor of mediums like TV. | nonrandomstring wrote: | > This article suggests that the written word is a crutch for | thought | | I got that too. And yes, also ironic for the author (a writer | of some kind) to be advancing a seemingly anti-literary | agenda. | wizofaus wrote: | I've regretted hours spent watching TV, playing computer games, | trying to figure out how to complete a task with no information | available, being stuck waiting somewhere with nothing to do, but | I can't think of a case I've regretted time spent reading. There | may be people in the world whose lives would be improved by | reading less, but I'm guessing a vanishingly small number. | cs137 wrote: | The author seems to be focused on low-quality reading, both in | terms of the material itself and in terms of habits formed | while giving the material the (scant) attention it deserves. He | says we encounter almost half a million words daily. No one is | giving that stuff a deep reading, or should. | | The culprit is probably work. Think of how much of the typical | office job involves ingesting low-quality information at high | speed. The jobs aren't mentally taxing, but they do burn you | out from serious reading, because of all the time wasted on | peoples' shitty emails. You basically need to become a skimmer | to survive modern life, especially if you work an office job, | and there's a nonzero amount of mental effort in code switching | from serious reading to half-assed work email reading. | sabellito wrote: | I feel the same way but I don't know why. Even when I spend | time reading average fiction, it still feels better than | watching youtube. | m_mueller wrote: | I think it's just like the difference of being spoon fed some | yoghurt compared to having a full course dinner. That being | said I still find YouTube better than Netflix, or worse, TV | in that regard - at least you chose the yoghurt and some of | it is actually pretty healthy (e.g. some of the top notch | educational content). | harry8 wrote: | How about the time spent reading this (Schrodinger's value) | comment on an internet social media site? | wizofaus wrote: | It's opinions I disagree with that I often feel are the more | valuable to spend time reading. | [deleted] | drewcoo wrote: | We are constantly programmed by our surroundings. By every | stimulus we allow to interact with us. Wherever we go. We can't | stop it. We can only control it. Sorta. | | That doesn't mean heavy metal is what made me a devil worshipper. | Or that video games are the reason I killed that family of four. | Or that having cared lovingly for several small stuffed animals | as a child is why I spared their dog on that dread day. And | social media will not convince anyone that anything else I've | written in this paragraph is remotely true. They're not going to | lose themselves in some sick fantasy. | | Is this the author's stage before or after solipsism? I forget. | bglusman wrote: | Didn't read 100% of article yet but the premise somewhat brings | to mind the book "The Alphabet vs the Goddess"[0] which... | definitely criticisms can be made/definitely isn't the whole | story for the events and narrative of history it focuses on, but | is really compelling and interesting interweaving of some major | historical threads not otherwise easily or often connected | | [0] | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Alphabet_Versus_the_Godd... | einpoklum wrote: | > What would your grasp of the outside world feel like? ... | increasingly ... simplified, abstracted, flattened ... | | More to the contrary. The more you see selected still images and | video clips, the more your perception of the world through this | becomes shallow, simplistic, garish. It is the written text which | delves into complexity, the multitude of facets and nuances, | depth. | Sebb767 wrote: | This is a take on the allegory of the cave[0]: | | > In the allegory "The Cave," Socrates describes a group of | people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all their | lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected | on the wall from objects passing in front of a fire behind them | and give names to these shadows. The shadows are the prisoners' | reality, but are not accurate representations of the real | world. | | So, basically, the point is that if you only ever see the | abstraction, it becomes your reality. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave | einpoklum wrote: | ... which is funny, because IIRC Socrates was trying to get | people recognize "ideal forms", perfect truths, as opposed to | their imperfect manifestations/reflections in the world. | mcdermott wrote: | I think what you read is the key here. Mindless reading of text | messages, news headlines and social media posts is very different | cognitively than reading actual literature, something like Thomas | Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow. | leobg wrote: | Interested in sharing what makes this particular work valuable, | in your eyes? I'm assuming that you've read many books. So if | you single out this one as an example for a particularly good | read, I'm curious to hear why. Thanks! | Dan_Sylveste wrote: | There's an element of irony here I suspect. Gravity's Rainbow | is (IMHO) a _good_ book but it's a pain in the neck to read | as a lot of the writing is... complex. | | There's a true point being made that a lot of social media | content is incredibly badly written and the brain 'teaches | itself' to fill in blanks that you don't have to fill in when | reading literature, though. | | If you go from reading books (any books, really, anything | that's been published) to reading reddit you have to go | through an adjustment period as so much of what's on the | screen looks like gibberish as it's so un-edited. | deepsun wrote: | ... or Hacker News comments. | bumby wrote: | I think the author tries to capture the counterpoint: that much | of the effect is due to the sheer volume of text. From the | article: | | "...we would have to account for the quality of reading too, as | much of it involves skimming and darting around the page. But | the sheer quantity matters...We are so used to our screens | bombarding us with text -- news, tweets, emails -- that we are | almost surprised to discover that the walls around us have | nothing to say. The sudden absence of words -- the evaporation | of the sense of control they give us -- feels disorienting. " | purplerabbit wrote: | Social media posts may be bad for you brain, but my personal | opinion of Gravity's Rainbow is that ~everyone who "enjoys" | that painful slog does so because of the "literary" status | "enjoying" Gravity's Rainbow affords them | goalieca wrote: | People spend too much time in their heads and not enough in the | real world. We used to say people need to stop reading books | and start talking to people. | formerly_proven wrote: | People need to get out and touch grass way more often. | gnicholas wrote: | I feel like the shift in social media from Facebook to instagram | and TikTok actually makes us less surrounded by text than we were | last decade. | paulpauper wrote: | _If an alien landed on Earth today, it might assume that reading | and writing are our species' main function, second only to | sleeping and well ahead of eating and reproducing._ | | what about: | | watching tv | | driving | | playing video games | | watching porn | | watching video online | | podcasts/audio books | PartiallyTyped wrote: | All of them involve reading and/or writing of some kind. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-26 23:00 UTC)