[HN Gopher] Trolley.co.uk is shutting down - pricing data is app... ___________________________________________________________________ Trolley.co.uk is shutting down - pricing data is apparently owned by a company Author : zikohh Score : 36 points Date : 2022-06-27 20:26 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.trolley.co.uk) (TXT) w3m dump (www.trolley.co.uk) | technick wrote: | Setup a shell company in Bermuda that does the scrapping for you | and then claim you buy the data from them. When they approach you | just tell them you have a NDA and can't disclose the company. | That'll keep them at bay for awhile... then when you're forced to | disclose, they'll spend the rest of their time chasing a shell | company in Bermuda. | | OR..... | | Just create a firefox extension that scrapes the pages for your | users. | | There's many ways to keep this going while giving them the middle | finger and serving your users. | Komodai wrote: | Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me... Aren't there tons of | companies like Trolley that scrape data, etc. without issues? | | Like, I assume these do: PriceSpy, PriceRunner, PrisJakt, | Shopping.com, PriceGrabber, etc. | sslalready wrote: | A lot of E-commerce software have data feeds that are ingested | by parties like pricespy. These feeds are typically either | public or made available after mutual agreements. Scraping a | large amount of sites for data is just too much labor in the | long run. | verve_rat wrote: | You can't copyright a list of facts. I'm confused about what they | have run in to? Maybe they should take some of the money they | have raised and talk to a lawyer. | [deleted] | michaelt wrote: | The cease & desist mentions Asda [1] and [2] says "Asda chose | NielsenIQ Brandbank, their existing digital content provider | for 13 years" | | So I'd wager the C&D came from Brandbank - who presumably | supply product photos and product data (barcode, pack size, and | all the other data like nutritional information you'd find on | the packet if you were browsing in store) | | [1] https://www.trolley.co.uk/imgs/cease-and-desist-letter.png | [2] https://www.brandbank.com/asda-accelerates-their-rich- | conten... | esjeon wrote: | You can if you _curate_ the list. Curating requires collecting | and processing information, which often can be expensive. | sdflhasjd wrote: | Yes, I could understand (if not also somewhat disagree) with it | regarding photos, but "and data"? What does that entail? | arcza wrote: | Seems very off and unsustainable (e.g. what happens in 2023 is | unclear), along with hiding the licensor's name - that seems | unreasonable. Who is the end recipient of this donation? I don't | buy the story. | goldcd wrote: | I'm also slightly confused. | | If they were scraping the information/pictures off the | supermarket sites, then I'd have expected the cease and desist to | come from the supermarkets. | | Given that the letter came from "a company" then I presume they | were taking their information from an aggregator - and seems | entirely fair that you should "pay the aggregator" (as there's | clearly a company out there doing something similar to what | they're doing - but they were taking their data). | | If this company was just a data-hose, then I'd have thought you | could monetize your consumer-focussed product, simply by flogging | anonymized data from your users back to the supermarkets. | "Customer X, dropped product Y from their weekly basket (or | swapped supermarket), when you raised the price of Z (or other | supermarket dropped it)" | [deleted] | mytailorisrich wrote: | The whole thing smells fishy. | | While pictures would be under copyright (and it's possible | copyright is with a third party specialised in this), I can't see | how the price listed for a product on, say, Tesco's website and | collected by yourself on Tesco's website could be subject to | licensing by a third party, even considering database rights. | | I am also puzzled by those guys claim that they got a very | "generous offer" from that company. | | If they are unsure a better first step would be to crowdfund | legal advice. | | They could then crowdsource taking pictures of all the products | from their users. | Arnavion wrote: | Well it seems they're _not_ scraping Tesco 's website but some | aggregator middleman. Like making a package tracking website | using Parcels instead of FedEx, UPS, etc individually. Sure | it's convenient to write code that only scrapes one website, | but now that website is mad because it has a business selling | that data. | Closi wrote: | Unless there is a third party which is taking photos of all | grocery products and then licensing that to the supermarkets, | to avoid them all having to take their own photos? | | I used to work for one of the major supermarkets and am aware | that there are providers of product images, but don't know the | specifics in enough detail. | mr_toad wrote: | Taking a photo only gives you copyright over that photo, it | doesn't stop other people taking a similar photo. | | A lot of business try and claim copyright of a subject (like | a tourist attraction) and try and prevent photography of it, | but that's legal BS in any jurisdiction I've heard of. | michaelt wrote: | Right, but if you're making a price-comparison website with | scraped data, you can't scrape the product image from a | supermarket website legally. | | You could of course get images from some other source - but | you need meticulous organisation when a single brand of tea | might have 40, 80, 160, 240 and 600 bag packages. | Closi wrote: | This assumes that the supermarket took the photos - what | I mean is the supermarket might buy those product photos | under license. | Closi wrote: | No, I mean they take the actual photographs and then | license them to the retailers. Plus they can also capture | other product data in a consistent format etc. | | See here as an example: https://www.brandbank.com/content- | licensing/ | | So for instance you could scrape a website that licenced | images from brandbank above, and then fall foul of their | copyright. | | Brandbank as an example does work with UK supermarkets, | e.g. see below: | | https://www.brandbank.com/tag/sainsburys/ | https://www.brandbank.com/tesco-case-study/ | matt321 wrote: | can publicly available data be the property of someone? | mtmail wrote: | It seems to be related to the product images, or the images | were easiest to identify and fight over | https://www.trolley.co.uk/imgs/cease-and-desist-letter.png | While a product name, price could be public (a person can see | it in a store), the picture is very specific and trolley didn't | take the pictures. | anigbrowl wrote: | It seems they could also just cease use of the 'offending' | informationa nd use generic imagery or descriptions instead. | For bandwidth/processing reasons, I'd prefer as much text and | as few graphics as possible anyway. | sdflhasjd wrote: | Unfortunately, supermarket products would be difficult to | distinguish without imagery. | itake wrote: | even then, why does it cost 28k PER YEAR, for photos of | product images? Can't you just spend a week in a market | taking product photos yourself? | bpicolo wrote: | Depends on your country / jurisdiction | lapser wrote: | As others have said, it seems fishy. | | They've got this data from somewhere, so why wouldn't they have | looked through the license before using it? | | Anyway, speaking of MySupermarket, what happened to them? All I | know was one day they decided to shut down, without clear | reasons. Does anyone have more insight into why it happened? | Komodai wrote: | They got it from web scraping, doesn't exactly have a license I | guess...? | notahacker wrote: | Yeah, I'm scratching my head at this. On the one hand, the UK | does have some weird database trolls (a copyright troll called | FootballDataCo claimed licence fees from anybody publishing | football fixture lists irrespective of where they sourced the | information from, and probably can do again since the EU court | judgement against them presumably no longer applies) | | On the other hand it makes no sense to accompany a supposed | order to c&d screen scraping of multiple (independently | maintained) websites with thanks for their generosity and "this | company is absolutely entitled to request compensation for | their work". Either they're a valuable data provider or an | licensing obstacle to using perfectly adequate screen scraping | techniques, not both. Not sure why a price comparison website | would screen scrape the supermarkets with APIs either... | mr_gibbins wrote: | It looks like a startup that's hit a brick wall viz a viz | licensing pictures. | | One way of getting around this, albeit perhaps at the expense of | user experience, is to insert stock photos. E.g. I imagine | 'carrots' is not particularly unique. Where stock photos can't be | used, i.e. it's a specialist/one-off product, perhaps the classic | white-box-black-text approach? | | If this is a genuine site with good intentions, staffed by | volunteers then it would be a shame to see it stamped down by the | supermarkets. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-27 23:00 UTC)