[HN Gopher] Battersea Power Station in London unveils the newly ... ___________________________________________________________________ Battersea Power Station in London unveils the newly restored Control Room A Author : davidbarker Score : 93 points Date : 2022-06-29 17:00 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (batterseapowerstation.co.uk) (TXT) w3m dump (batterseapowerstation.co.uk) | TylerE wrote: | For non UK readers, Battersea Power Station is the building on | the cover of Pink Floyd's album Animals | dtgriscom wrote: | ... minus the pig. | implements wrote: | Also features as a government museum building in "Children of | Men" (run by the protagonist's cousin): | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDEFgX-uFZc | | The floating pig makes a couple of appearances. | Rodeoclash wrote: | Here's a better quality video :) | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJO0n6kvPRU | brandall10 wrote: | Funny thing, this is the only reason I'm aware of this | building, as a non-UK reader. | InCityDreams wrote: | ...an awful lot of non-London people aren't aware/ still | don't care. The discussions on gentrification resound | throughout the country, though. Andcthe world, too, it would | appear. | blueflow wrote: | Oh, this is the 200 energy power plant from Red Alert! | dtgriscom wrote: | Here's the image used as a header on that page; there's a lot | more than what the web designer decided to show. | | https://cdn.batterseapowerstation.co.uk/_default_upload_buck... | WalterBright wrote: | Saved for wallpaper! My favorite is the Apollo mission control | room, with all the custom made consoles in it covered with | knobs, switches, lamps, and weird displays. | belter wrote: | It's a thing of beauty. I hope they play Pink Floyd during the | visits... | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals_%28Pink_Floyd_album%29 | mftb wrote: | Battersea is the location for the start of one of my favorite | books from childhood, The Borribles[0]. It has lived in my | imagination all these years. Now if I ever get over there I guess | I'll have something to go see. From what I heard in the old days, | it was pretty rough. | | [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Borrible_Trilogy | maxbond wrote: | It's also referenced(ish) in the gorgeous sci-fi novel Piranesi | by Susanna Clarke. | ncmncm wrote: | And, "Black Hearts at Battersea". | smm11 wrote: | Which switch controls the pig? | scrlk wrote: | A segment from the BBC documentary "The Secret Life of the | National Grid" talking about Battersea Power Station: | https://youtu.be/vtixR7w7S0E?t=601 | dayofthedaleks wrote: | The photographer Will Pearson documented Control Room A several | years ago with a 360 camera [0]. Click 'Launch Project' for | panorama. | | Control Room B is basically made of Cybermen [1]. | | [0] https://www.willpearson.co.uk/battersea-power-station- | contro... | | [1] https://www.flickr.com/photos/liamch/4222346877 | robocat wrote: | Here's some 2015 photos from an urban explorer: | | https://adamxphotos.com/2016/03/20/explore-134-battersea-pow... | klelatti wrote: | These are great - thanks for sharing. | | One nugget is the amount of water boiled each day - 160 million | gallons - an incredible number! | WalterBright wrote: | Too bad that too-clever site caused Chrome to crash. :-( | recursivedoubts wrote: | "Art Deco style was of the moment with Control Room A boasting | teak parquet flooring laid in a herringbone pattern and walls | tiled in grey Italian marble offset by black Belgian marble | detailing through the room, matched by a gold painted coffered | glass ceiling." | | this was a power station | | what happened | ceejayoz wrote: | We realized that the 99.999% of the population would never | visit the plant, and thus prefer a dollar or two savings on | their bill. | recursivedoubts wrote: | libraries don't look like this anymore either | ceejayoz wrote: | Similar scenario, really; more books, computers, programs, | and librarians trumps a fancy building in my book. | semi-extrinsic wrote: | There is a (IMO quite funny) conspiracy theory that there was a | massive disaster at a leading architecture and design | conference some time in the 1930s, such that almost everyone | who knew how to make beautiful things died, and nowadays we | actually can't design and build beautiful buildings anymore, | it's all ugly modernist stuff. | mortenjorck wrote: | The funny thing is, there are still plenty of beautiful | modernist buildings from the 1940s and beyond (look at some | of Mies' 1960s office towers, for instance), and yet the idea | that a power plant could or should have that level of care | and quality put into it somehow fell (far) out of favor. | | Imagine a modern power plant control room with a look | somewhere between an Apple store and the Parks' home in | Parasite. _This_ is what they took from you! | myself248 wrote: | I've been watching a lot of Proper People urbex videos on | YouTube, and they go out of their way to recognize the | design that went into ordinary places, back when those | places were somewhat extraordinary. | | You see, in the 1930s, electric power _was_ glamorous, even | its generation. The idea of a municipal utility _serving | the public_ was a big deal. All the modern miracles that | enabled dense cities to grow upward, electric water pumps | and elevators and inter-office telephones, were shiny and | new and worth celebrating. | | So, celebrate they did. Telephone central offices built in | the 1920s and 30s are cathedrals to the tamed electron, | with ornate Art-Deco carvings and stone arches and tile | inlay adorning their entrances. I've had the privilege | (yes!) of working in quite a number of them, and while the | asbestos precautions are a hassle sometimes, there is a | palpable feeling, even a century later, of showing up to | work somewhere respectable. Proud. Exalted. | FabHK wrote: | Zeche Zollverein is an industrial complex in Essen, Germany. | Shaft 12, built in the 1930s in the Bauhaus style, has been | called the "most beautiful coal mine in the world": | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zollverein_Coal_Mine_Industria... | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zollverein_Coal_Mine_Industria... | camtarn wrote: | With the beautiful art deco ceiling and walls, it almost feels | more like a palatial monument to the power of electricity, rather | than a mere control room. Imagine if we strove to make our | industrial spaces as attractive nowadays! Modern control rooms | are still breathtaking, but more through the sheer volume of | _stuff_ - blinking lights, giant monitors, diagrams, and so on - | than through decoration. | biofox wrote: | Scott Alexander wrote an interesting post on this: | | https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/whither-tartaria | samizdis wrote: | The Victorians had a similarly grand take on public utility | buildings, especially pump houses for water/sewage works. | Probably the best example is Crossness Pumping Station [1]. The | interior is stunning; this [2] is one image from the Wikipedia | page/ | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossness_Pumping_Station | | [2] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Crossness_Pumping_Station... | camtarn wrote: | Wow! Absolutely gorgeous. | | I wonder what the motivation was for such over-the-top | decoration? Lots of money sloshing around and a desire to | make things beautiful for beauty's sake? Individual or | governmental prestige? | jesterpm wrote: | I assumed that the gap between the cost to do the bare | minimum and the cost to do some elaborate was smaller at | the time. If you're already laying each brick by hand, it | seems like the incremental cost to work a pattern into the | bricks would be small compared to modern (bland) poured- | concrete buildings, where we lay a whole floor in one go. | Likewise in other trades. | | We invented machines to build large amounts of simple | things cheaply, so we designed simpler things. | doovd wrote: | Reminds me of metro stations in Moscow: https://www.theguar | dian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2015/oct/31... | Arrath wrote: | Wow that is gorgeous. | jl6 wrote: | I find data centers to be attractive in a functional sense (and | some are even "decorated" via color coding). Maybe functional | is just our age's style. | ccity88 wrote: | I grew up and live a short 5 minute walk from Battersea Power | Station - I have some fond memories of playing in the (admittedly | quite unsafe) industrial estate around that area. It's quite sad | to see what it's become now; as much as I support the development | of the local area, they had to add a bunch of shopping outlets, | restaurants, and very expensive boutique outlets. It's completely | antithetical to the local identity of the area - literally | opposite a council estate. The area is essentially unaffordable | and has transformed into a sort of camden/southwark esque | hellscape of bourgeois gentrification. Everyone I know has been | either priced out, or will be in the next couple of years. I | anticipate having to move due to developers wanting to demolish | this council estate - I get letters every day asking about | private purchasing agreements. | walrus01 wrote: | This is what happens when real estate developers and commercial | landlord equity firms capture the interest and begin directing | the activity of your local politicians. | | The almost _inevitable_ result is bougie commercialization of | something into a bland market palatable shopping district. Look | at the parts of NYC that are being gentrified for similar | examples. | gffrd wrote: | East New York is the new LES! | walrus01 wrote: | not to be confused with _west new york_ , which confusingly | enough, is in new jersey | fumblebee wrote: | I'm reminded of the (fantastic) documentary about a building I | once lived in: Aragon Tower in Surrey Quays [1]. | | Since it was built in the 1960s, it was one of the tallest | council estate buildings in all of London, but ~twenty years | ago private developers bought it out and converted it into | "luxury" flats. At the base of these flats however, is the | notorious Pepys council estate, of which Aragon Tower was once | a part of. | | The documentary aims to shine a light on the disparity between | the varnished lives of glossy marketeers and new residents of | those in the "upgraded" tower, with the folks forcibly removed, | and those in the Pepys estate with exceedingly hard lives. | | Highly recommend. | | [1] https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4asu6x | mmarq wrote: | I'm not sympathetic at all with this idea. | | They shouldn't have built shops and restaurants because there's | a council estate? | | On gentrification, if you own your flat then you have won the | lottery, for its price is 8 times what it was 20 years ago. | Similarly if you can use the so-called "right to buy". If you | are renting privately, you should get you MP to vote the | abolition of section 21, which is an uncivilised law. That | should sort out all issues related to people being priced out | of the area. | OhyeahIfrgot wrote: | My grandfather grew up in Battersea - just off Park Road - in | the 1920s, and he told me that his first 'proper' job after | leaving school was as a 'telegram boy' and that one of his | first deliveries was to the base of the 'rear left' tower (as | you look at it from the river) while it was still only about | half way finished, to one of the stone masons. I have photos of | him in his uniform and cap and its lovely to imagine him | climbing up the scaffold to deliver the telegram. | detritus wrote: | This seems to be the case across much of London, sadly. | | 'Synthetic' is the word that comes to mind whenever I see these | developments. Frankly, as much as the effort impresses me from | a technical point, I'm content enough only ever seeing it from | afar when I pass vaguely nearby on a train going south. I | suspect I'll never actually walk through it. | | Having 'argued' with people on HN about this sort of thing | beforehand, I know that my view isn't exactly unanimous, so | clearly some people like this sort of 'development'. | gswdh wrote: | flir wrote: | It's cold comfort, but gentrification isn't an end-state it's | a process. Large parts of London have reached their soulless | peak, and are going to start sliding down the other side of | the slope. In a couple of generations they'll be filled with | the marginalised again, and the cycle will start over. | astrange wrote: | The counterfactual to gentrification (no investment) | wouldn't help anyone; you'd just have some rotting empty | buildings. | | Though, what people call gentrification is often just | younger people moving into an area replacing older people. | So maybe you could fight it by building senior housing and | whatever it is old British people like. Model trains maybe. | 202206241203 wrote: | In a second-world country, they would just demolish the | building and maybe sell some of the control room knobs on | e-bay. It might be as good as it gets in terms of involving | private capital. | | I personally think that mid-century technological artefacts | are underappreciated. | SoftTalker wrote: | Yes I love this era of technology. Just look at the photo | of the control room. It feels like it's really scaled to be | usable by humans. The large dials, levers and switches, all | styled artistically as well as functionally. The natural | light, marble walls, all the detail in the ceiling, floor, | and woodwork. It looks like a very comfortable room to be | in. | | Compare to the more modern sterile industrial control | rooms, windowless, cold, everything run on screens and | keyboards, no sense of a connection with the massive | machinery being operated. | jl6 wrote: | Synthetic is the right word. They are trying to package and | sell authenticity. I just went to the website of the | development. Sorry, the "village". They've even got a "street | food festival". | | I don't really object to any of the commerce, but the fake | brands and lifestyle are intense cringe. | jonwinstanley wrote: | Unfortunately this is the way of the world. This is a major | redevelopment and has cost hundreds of millions of pounds. To | do it they take on huge investment, the investors expect a | return so obviously they've built fancy shops, restaurants | etc. | | I understand that there are places where redevelopment has | been handled more sensitivity but this area in particular has | needed an enormous outlay to convert it such a primate area. | | Hopefully within a few years it will start to gain its own | identity and start again. | mmarq wrote: | > Unfortunately this is the way of the world. This is a | major redevelopment and has cost hundreds of millions of | pounds. To do it they take on huge investment, the | investors expect a return so obviously they've built fancy | shops, restaurants etc. | | I always wonder what's the alternative to fancy shops. Is | it the usual English high street with store signs made of | rotten wood? Cheap minicab companies? | | > I understand that there are places where redevelopment | has been handled more sensitivity but this area in | particular has needed an enormous outlay to convert it such | a primate area. | | There's nothing to preserve in that area. It was an | industrial wasteland surrounded by council flats and dodgy | pubs. | | > Hopefully within a few years it will start to gain its | own identity and start again. | | Hopefully not, hopefully it will develop a new and better | identity. | stuaxo wrote: | The template for most British town centres is terrible. | detritus wrote: | Quite. I suppose I'm ignoring the fact that London was | developed in bygone years in similary large tranches that | have eventually found their form. | [deleted] | pcrh wrote: | I lived nearby for a few years many years ago. | | While I appreciate the sentiments you express, I can say that | the site was all but abandoned for many many years. For a while | it seemed likely that the iconic towers would be demolished, as | there was no economic case to be made for keeping them. So I'm | glad they were saved, somehow. | | Even so, I agree that the recent developments south of the | river are rather soul-less. Areas such as 9 Elms and along the | river towards Wandsworth are particularly lacking in visual or | any other interest. | easytiger wrote: | Don't understand this view. For a start clearing up the area to | make it buildable cost somewhere in the region of PS1bn. If you | are harking back to a time when it was an undesirable wasteland | I can't agree that that constitutes a better world. | | Much of London complaining about gentrification is complaining | that the postwar desolation of London was a good thing; because | that's what they are "benefitting" from. | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | The displaced people still have to live somewhere, even if | the bougies like to pretend otherwise. | [deleted] | KptMarchewa wrote: | There's no "displaced" people if the space was unused for | 40 years. | ChrisKnott wrote: | It wasn't even residential it was an industrial area | mmarq wrote: | Yes, that area was an obscene wasteland, right in front of | that monstrosity on the other side of the river: Churchill | gardens. | | Before the power station was renewed, the only place with | something to do in the entirety of the Wandsworth borough was | Northcote road (and 15 years ago not even that). | MrsPeaches wrote: | Not to mention that the view of the power station from Chelsea | bridge is completely gone due to the development. Such a shame, | it was one of my favourite views in London. | londons_explore wrote: | The circuit diagrams above the control panels appear to be | nonsensical... | | Do they use some notation I'm unfamiliar with, or are they some | 'artists impression' by a non-technical artist? | | If the latter, I'm really disappointed. 80 year old steam systems | and generators are understandable by anyone doing high school | physics, and we really shouldn't be making museum pieces that | have made-up nonsense to try and make things impossible to | understand. | dtgriscom wrote: | I'm 99% sure they're real. They don't represent transistors and | resistors; they're transformers, generators, switches, etc. | | Would love to get a technical tour, though. | blueflow wrote: | Its common to make up some other diagram systems for specific | usecases. | djaychela wrote: | The article says that Lucas UK was part of the restoration | team. I'd be suprised if they were just making things up to | look nice - and while they don't make any sense to me in terms | of normal circuit diagrams, it's quite possible they are using | non-standard (or probably now extinct) notation. | ceejayoz wrote: | You can see the same diagrams in the pre-restoration photos | (example: https://londonist.com/2013/02/panorama-battersea- | power-stati...). They won't have made any modifications from | the original state if they can avoid it. | myself248 wrote: | "Single line diagram" is common in utility power, because the | electricity itself is 3-phase so drawing individual conductors | and components would clutter the diagram with information not | needed at a high level. | | Many discrete components are omitted as well; the idea is to | give the operators an immediately-comprehensible sense of how | much power is flowing where, and where the measurement and | interruption points are. Little more is needed at that stage. | s3ctor8 wrote: | > Battersea Power Station has today unveiled the first images of | its newly restored Control Room A. | | Where are the images? All I can see (on mobile) is the one at the | top of the article. Am I missing something? Have I forgotten how | to use the Internet? | liketochill wrote: | I wonder if my pihole is blocking them | jaygreco wrote: | My thought exactly! At least on mobile, it kind of defeats the | purpose of the unveiling if there are no images to see... | dublin wrote: | I'm on desktop (Firefox) and the top image is the only one I | see, too - I spent a minute or so hunting to see if they were | hiding somewhere, to no avail... | ChrisClark wrote: | Even on desktop, there is only the header image. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-29 23:00 UTC)