[HN Gopher] Modern city dwellers have lost about half their gut ... ___________________________________________________________________ Modern city dwellers have lost about half their gut microbes Author : Hooke Score : 145 points Date : 2022-06-30 20:37 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.science.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.science.org) | lbeltrame wrote: | About ten years ago my former PI (second author in the below | paper) did quite a job on this in Burkina Faso, analyzing the | composition of the gut in children living outside cities, in | cities, and a comparison with European children. | | Obligatory disclaimer: I was working in his laboratory at the | time, but I wasn't involved in that research. | | https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1005963107 | aluminussoma wrote: | How does one analyze the gut biome? I imagine it involves | running poop through a machine - what kind of machine? I would | love to learn more about the technical process. | nebfield wrote: | The paper uses 16S rDNA sequencing, which is a bit old | fashioned now but it was a good method when the paper was | published. The steps basically involve: | | 1. Extract all DNA from poop, normally using a kit that | basically makes DNA stick to tiny plastic beads. You wash the | beads in a bunch of different chemical solutions to isolate | DNA from the original sample and purify it. There are a lot | of different methods to do this. | | 2. Amplify a small section of DNA that's universally unique | to bacteria and archaea which is used as a barcode. This | barcode has some areas that change a lot across different | species and some areas that don't change much. | | 3. Sequence the amplified DNA. The DNA sequencer determines | the sequence of nucleotides in each DNA amplicon (an amplicon | is a piece amplified piece of DNA). An example DNA sequence | is ACCTGGCT | | 3. The DNA sequencer produces millions of DNA sequences in | parallel and stores them and some metadata (e.g. quality and | confidence measurements) in text files | | 4. When this paper was published, a friendly bioinformatician | would have taken the text file and clustered the different | sequences. Sequences 97% similar were binned together as a | rough approximation of a species. Different taxonomic levels | have different cutoffs, but it's all quite vague and there | are better methods now that involve denoising sequences from | quality measurements (e.g. dada2 method) | | 5. A count for each different bin is generated, and | "representative sequences" for each bin are matched against | taxonomic databases to see what species are present | | 6. Normal ecological analysis is done on the count data to | calculate alpha and beta diversity or do other types of | analysis. Once you have counts, it doesn't matter that the | data are from bacteria instead of sheep or penguins | | Newer methods involve sequencing every single bit of DNA in a | sample, not just a specific region. This is called | metagenomics and it's very hard to do and requires very big | computers and big DNA sequencers. | ebolyen wrote: | Great summary! Although I would argue that 16S is still a | perfectly good (and cost-effective) method, especially with | DADA2. There are also neat sequencing techniques that like | CCS which give you really high resolution of a target | region (amplicon) without sequencing a lot of | redundant/uninformative DNA. | feet wrote: | Most likely extracting and culturing then PCR | | Edit: grabbed from the methods section. I was wrong, they | didn't culture :) | | >Fecal samples were collected by physicians and preserved in | RNAlater (Qiagen) at -80 degC until extraction of genomic DNA | (28) (details in SI Materials and Methods). | jonny_eh wrote: | What's a "former PI"? | [deleted] | sieabahlpark wrote: | chronometry888 wrote: | The private investigator with whom you have severed ties. | vanattab wrote: | principal investigator | trollied wrote: | "The person(s) in charge of a clinical trial or a scientific | research grant. The PI prepares and carries out the clinical | trial protocol (plan for the study) or research paid for by | the grant. The PI also analyzes the data and reports the | results of the trial or grant research. Also called principal | investigator." | [deleted] | alienchow wrote: | 3.1415Nein | etiam wrote: | "Principal investigator". Roughly a research group leader. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_Investigator | kkaranth wrote: | The former "Principal Investigator" of the (research) | project. Often the professor who is responsible for obtaining | the grant and driving progress | setgree wrote: | Wow is the mobile UX of PNAS bad -- the cookie pop-up has no X | button and if you click 'continue' -- which I thought meant | continue to the article -- it directs you to the terms of | service. If you press back, you see the same pop-up again. | | Looks like interesting research though! | [deleted] | Sunspark wrote: | Once a gene has started expressing, it's pretty hard to flip the | switch back to the off position. Losing the microbes is a big | problem. | | It's just going to get worse. People seem to have this fetish for | anti-bacterial everything.. soaps, coatings, etc. They take anti- | biotics even for viral issues then they wonder why they start | developing a new health problem they didn't have before, like a | mood disorder or an autoimmune issue. | thelittleone wrote: | Here in Indonesia, antibiotics can be bought over the counter | without a prescription. Many people self medicate for a cough | or runny nose (they don't distinguish whether viral or | bacterial, most likely the average worker doesn't know the | difference). | | Few have the luxury to take a sick day so the pressure is on. | olliej wrote: | What did the lost microbes do? If they helped digest things | that aren't part of our diet then the there would be no | selective pressure maintaining them, so they could be easily | dropped, independent of the issues of vast over-application of | antibiotics, etc. | | Over application of antibiotics and anti-bacterial stuff is | clearly causing problems, but that's not the only thing that is | happening that impacts something as complex as the gut. Just as | with genes, the microbiome is under constant selective pressure | from evolution, and we will - over time - gain new microbes as | we lose ones that aren't beneficial. | goatcode wrote: | >people in U.S. cities...people in less developed parts of the | world | | What about people in the US who are not in cities? That's the | more interesting comparison to me. Why would that be left out? | jascii wrote: | I'm curious why that comparison is _more_ interesting to you? I | can see great value in having _both_ data points when trying to | formulate a hypothesis about what causes the decline in gut- | microbes in us city folks, but I find it hard to think of a | use-case for solely a urban /rural comparison without other | context. | | (Update: I was thinking about this from a scientific | perspective, ignoring the idea that people might be interested | in what it means for them personally (facepalm) ) | runjake wrote: | Because a bunch of us don't live in the city or urban | environments and we're curious. | jascii wrote: | So the interest stems from a curiosity about your own gut- | microbes? That seems fair enough, I may have been | overthinking this... | CodeBeater wrote: | Personal interest does not necessarily equal marginal | utility. | jstanley wrote: | Even from a scientific perspective, it would be more | interesting to see the effect of each variable independently | (cities vs rural, US vs somewhere else) rather than bundling | them together. | goatcode wrote: | I shouldn't say more overall, but the difference among people | who have a similar diet and circumstances, but differ by | housing culture, would be interesting to observe. I'd like to | see apples to apples, if indeed the theorized reason of where | gut differences come from is strictly (or mostly) urban vs. | rural. Is it that country people are around more dirt, or | that city people have different stressors, or maybe both are | included? It'd be easier to tell if other differences are | eliminated, imo. I've long preferred country life, having | spent roughly half of my life in cities and the other half in | the country, so maybe some personal interest is there too, to | be honest. I do feel a lot healthier living in the | countryside, perhaps my gut has something to do with that. | woodruffw wrote: | > What about people in the US who are not in cities? That's the | more interesting comparison to me. Why would that be left out? | | At least in the US, my lay-intuition is that you wouldn't see | much of a difference between _average_ Americans between urban, | suburban, and rural settings. That 's perhaps worth testing, | but I think the much more interesting test would be between | wealth and class groups. | | (Again, wild speculation: it's easy to imagine that most gut | biota don't care about the difference between dollar-store | knockoff sodas and brand-name sodas, but _definitely do care_ | about $14 free-range, organic eggs.) | mathgeek wrote: | > but definitely do care about $14 free-range, organic eggs | | Can you elaborate on why you think this is the case? | Intuitively to me, most folks' diets are going to be mostly | cooked eggs which would reduce any effect on bacteria in the | gut. | woodruffw wrote: | Sorry, I meant that as a proxy for "families that have the | purchasing power to buy premium goods." My intuition is | that there's a _weak_ inverse relationship between food | processing and food price, with less processing | corresponding to healthier gut biota. But you're right that | the $14 eggs themselves probably don't matter. | olliej wrote: | My first thoughts are (without access to the actual article) | | * We have lost the microbiome that primates present | | * have we gained other microbes? | | * what did those microbes we lost do? If they break down heavy | fibre (branches) we may simply not need them, so evolution would | stop selecting for them | | * This says cities, but it (a) only appears to look at the US, | and (b) the article doesn't mention comparing to non-city | dwellers in the US. Saying "cities" without also providing a non- | city reference seems bogus, but also could simply be left out of | the article. | | * Following from the "US only" comment above - how stable is this | microbiome between geographical regions in the US?, how about | different countries in close geographic location (think Europe)?, | or geographically separated countries with similar culture? | different culture? | | All of these things _might_ be answered in the paper, but per- | usual Science has given us a fairly useless summary article with | a clickbait headline :-( | | [Edited to bring back formatting. For a text only, anti-emoji, | etc site HN is obnoxiously opposed to basic white space | formatting :-/] | afarviral wrote: | I'd be really curious where some of these wild microbes can be | found so we can repopulate them. | | Every time I brush my teeth, use dish washing liquid or really | any man made substance with a lots of ingredients I also wonder | if I'm accidentally killing off my skin/mouth/gut microbiomes. | Not worried enough to only use water (not that tap water can be | fully trusted either....) | Bilal_io wrote: | Explore the use of Miswak for your teeth. | samstave wrote: | epgui wrote: | I'm unable to verify that quote. | | Also, it's irrelevant, and not really true at all. | samstave wrote: | epgui wrote: | You're right, I don't see the humour in this. | | And it's not pedantic to question a misquoting when the | meaning is completely different. Nor is it pedantic to | question the relevance of someone's comment. | | I don't think this quote means what you think it means. | rr888 wrote: | Does anyone know of probiotics with a variety of bacteria? | Currently they (and yoghurts) seem to be just a single type, | which doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If there are unusual | bacteria out there where do they come from and how can we get | them? | | I've done a bunch of anti-biotics in the last few years so what | to get back to what I was. | prirun wrote: | I've had good luck with these, taken one in the morning and one | at night. | | https://www.amazon.com/Probiotics-Formulated-Probiotic-Suppl... | | Now, instead of taking the probiotics, I make yogurt from whole | milk (it's easy!) and open 3 probiotic capsules as the starter, | letting it ferment for 24 hours to ensure all of the milk sugar | is gone. This gives 2 quarts of yogurt and I eat a tablespoon | every morning with breakfast. Way cheaper than the pills, plus | I have a problem swallowing the capsules. Has worked great for | me. | asdff wrote: | You don't need to order more starter once you have your | yogurt. You can use a spoonful of your last batch to start | the next batch. I go 30 minutes at 180-190*f with the milk, | then i let it cool to 110*f, then I add my scoop of yogurt, | then I will hold that at 110*f in a separate container in a | 110* waterbath (just a big pot of 110* water holding my | yogurt tupperware containers that I periodically splash more | hot water into) for like 8-12 hours or so (I sometimes forget | about it on the stove...). Then I put it in the fridge for | two days and after its good to go. If you want it to be more | like greek yogurt you can strain it with coffee filter paper | and use the whey liquid for various things. | asdff wrote: | chobani claims six strains of yogurts, I used that as starter | for my homemade yogurt batches since then. Otherwise I try and | get my exposure in from the environment. I'm vaccinated so I | don't bother with the mask unless there are hard rules. I will | avoid overusing hand sanitizer. I take crowded public transit | and otherwise walk around sidewalks and stores with a bunch of | people vs private car and delivery of all my needs. I do | computer work but I do almost all of it outdoors on a patio | table, where I am exposed to pollen and spores and microbe | aplenty (but probably better air quality than indoors given the | plastic off gassing in the modern home). Basically I am trying | to inoculate myself with a wide variety of things available in | my local environment, just like people used to be before all | this modern society stuff locked us sitting in rooms. It seems | to work as far as I can tell anecdotally; I can't remember the | last time I was sick. | trollied wrote: | I started taking these a month ago. They've worked wonders for | my IBS: Healthspan Super20 Pro 60 | https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B085632HRB | Splendor wrote: | A quick search turned up this one that claims to have 12 | strains of bacteria. It is also USP verified. I'm not an expert | and have never tried it, but hopefully that info helps. | | https://www.costco.com/trunature-advanced-digestive-probioti... | cheese_goddess wrote: | If you want variety of bacteria, then the highest is probably | in milk kefir, and the second highest in aged, hard cheese. | | Kefir, we don't even know how many or what bacteria it hosts, | but we know it's a lot. Different studies have reported wildly | different communities, but all of them with upwards of a dozen | species. For example: | | > Sequencing-Based Analysis of the Bacterial and Fungal | Composition of Kefir Grains and Milks from Multiple Sources | | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal... | | Aged hard cheese, unless made with raw milk, is usually | inocculated with a couple of strains of lactic acid bacteria, | but during aging a varied flora develops, of "adventitious | bacteria" and yeasts from the environment. | | To be honest though, I made kefir for a couple of years and | I've been making cheese for about four now and I make the | occasional yogurt now and then, but I'm still not convinced | about the health claims of "probiotics". And I'm not the only | one to be skeptical: | | > A growing probiotics market has led to the need for stricter | requirements for scientific substantiation of putative benefits | conferred by microorganisms claimed to be probiotic.[7] | Although numerous claimed benefits are marketed towards using | consumer probiotic products, such as reducing gastrointestinal | discomfort, improving immune health,[8] relieving constipation, | or avoiding the common cold, such claims are not supported by | scientific evidence,[7][9][10] and are prohibited as deceptive | advertising in the United States by the Federal Trade | Commission.[11] As of 2019, numerous applications for approval | of health claims by European manufacturers of probiotic dietary | supplements have been rejected by the European Food Safety | Authority for insufficient evidence of beneficial mechanism or | efficacy.[8][12] | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probiotic | | Btw, you know what elese has plenty of lactic acid bacteria, | therefore probiotics? Sourdough. Alhtough if you make kefir, | you can use it instead of sourdough as a bread starter. | jschveibinz wrote: | Microbiome research at John's Hopkins: | | https://www.hopkinsmicrobiome.com/faq | dukeofdoom wrote: | haklport wrote: | "Moeller and others also suggest identifying the missing microbes | may be the first step toward bringing them back. "If we determine | that these groups were providing important functions to keep | humans healthy," Maccaro says, "perhaps we can restore them with | probiotics." | | Oh really? Nice submarine for Actimel, Yakult etc. | antiterra wrote: | Unfortunately, the most effective treatment I know of to change | gut biome is bacteriotherapy via a method many people find off- | putting and violating. | | I think, for the time being, people are much more likely to | accept a probiotic. | zdragnar wrote: | Well, it's either a pill, or moving out of the city, or a fecal | transplant (assuming that the urban / rural divide is relevant, | and not just a proxy for diet). | | I don't live in the city, but if I were told that I would be | healthier with more of these microbes that my environment | doesn't support, I'd opt for the pill. | jgrantx wrote: | Doing nothing is also an option! I'm not aware of an | indigestion epidemic among city dwellers. | | Being told to do something is not sufficient, especially when | multi-billion dollar industries are behind it. | bawolff wrote: | More research is needed. | | However there is an obseity epidemic and a depression | epidemic, and its plausible they are related. Which doesn't | mean they are, but seems like something worth looking into. | dannyperson wrote: | The study compares humans (who happen to live in cities) to | primates (who definitely don't live in cities). It doesn't | compare between human populations. | boomchinolo78 wrote: | It's the iron fortified flour and then the people are like OMG I | have celiac and what not. There's a reason breast milk and milk | in general contains lactoferrin; guess what, they also remove it | from most milk that is in supermarkets. | getcrunk wrote: | can you please expand on this? | nebfield wrote: | The burden of proof for a coeliac disease diagnosis is quite | high: a biopsy from an endoscopy that shows classic signs of | damaged villi (from autoimmune mechanisms), or a blood test | with extremely high tTG levels and a family history of the | disease. | | https://www.bsg.org.uk/covid-19-advice/covid-19-specific-non... | Splendor wrote: | > ...a researcher reported last week at a microbiology meeting in | Washington, D.C. | | Am I missing it or is this all we are given as a source for the | claim in the headline? Not even a name? | wheelerof4te wrote: | It's the diet. | | City dwellers tend to eat a lot more unhealthy foods. They also | eat a lot less vegetables, fruit and nuts than their rural | country(wo)men. | | You want more microbes in your gut? Eat more plant-based food. | dagw wrote: | Having lived both in the city and fairly rural, I can say that | access to a healthy and varied diet is much much easier in the | city. Both when it came to restaurants and buying and cooking | food. | quickthrower2 wrote: | Small town / suburban areas can be the best with large | supermarkets or dedicated markets, as long as you have a car. | | That said bushland in Australia has natives that you can't | buy in the supermarket. So there is that. | | But the average person probably doesn't forage. | woodruffw wrote: | The study doesn't show this: it compares humans (who happen to | live in cities) to primates (who definitely don't live in | cities). It doesn't compare between human populations. | | Ironically, cities (particularly affluent ones, but in general) | probably have better access to fresh and healthy produce than | do medium or low-income rural areas. Some of that is supply and | demand (the economics of moving bulk produce favor large | population clusters), and some of it is pricing (affluent | consumers prefer cities and suburbs on average). You can see | these trends in the USDA's Food Atlas[1], which shows lots of | rural areas with poor access to produce. | | [1]: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access- | research-... | wheelerof4te wrote: | The US is not the entire world. | | It's your fault for having undeveloped rural areas with low | education levels. | hahaxdxd123 wrote: | > near non-sequitur thesis not discussed in article stated | definitively | | > flimsy evidence which isn't true | [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3365871/] | | Certified HackerNews moment! | 0bfus wrote: | > City dwellers tend to eat a lot more unhealthy foods. They | also eat a lot less vegetables, fruit and nuts than their rural | country(wo)men. | | Can't find it for meat in general, but it seems that rural | areas eat significantly more beef than suburban or urban | dwellers. | | https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/37388/29633_ldpm13... | . | sudden_dystopia wrote: | Based on the way my body responds and reviewing lab results | after trying different diets, I am of the opinion that it has | more to do with processed foods versus minimally/unprocessed | foods. I don't think whether it is plant or meat/dairy based | really matters that much nutritionally. Enriched flour, is | plant based but by no means do I believe that to be healthy. | Same goes for sausage and bacon, too processed. N of 1 but | since I stopped consuming processed food and stopped worrying | about cholesterol while restricting calories, eating plenty of | fruit & veggies, and exercising, I have actually lowered my ldl | cholesterol by 40 points. Triglycerides were fine. Dr was | thrilled, didn't have the heart to tell her I didn't follow her | advice. | baby wrote: | How does probiotic helps here? | kaycebasques wrote: | I had to use oral antibiotics about a year ago for reasons that | could have been avoided. I was pretty upset about it precisely | because it probably wreaked havoc on all the beneficial gut | microbes that I had built up over the years. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | I had a couple courses of IV antibiotics to fight a severe | tooth infection. All the oral surgeons who came in to check on | me recommended picking up a few bottles of probiotic drinks on | my way home. | subsubzero wrote: | Lacking these gut microbes has been posited to lead to depression | and effect mood by a few researchers: | | https://www.science.org/content/article/evidence-mounts-gut-... | digitcatphd wrote: | I think the consensus is nobody really knows and nutritional | science is largely trendy pseudoscience... | asdff wrote: | Pretty much every culture around the world 100 years ago had some | staple fermented food. Nowadays, a lot of people in western | culture at least outright refuse yogurt or other fermented foods | like saurkraut or pickled cabbage that used to be staples in | these people's ancestor's diets a few generations ago. People are | becoming even lactose intolerant. You have to fertilize your | microbes so to speak and eat these sorts of foods. Plus once you | are doing stuff like making your own yogurt, a jug of whole milk | works out a lot cheaper than the chobani stuff. | amarshall wrote: | > You have to fertilize your microbes so to speak and eat these | sorts of foods | | [citation needed]. It seems unlikely that fermented foods are | not consumed in urban areas at all. I've also no idea if other | primates consume any fermented foods, but I'd guess probably | not. | | > People are becoming even lactose intolerant | | Do any other primates drink milk after infancy? If not, that's | not really a valid concern in the context of the article. | msbarnett wrote: | No. In fact, almost all mammals stop producing lactase once | they stop nursing from a mother. Humans are quite rare in | that there's a significant population with the mutant | "lactose tolerant adult" gene. | steve_adams_86 wrote: | One tricky part with fermented foods is that the salty ones | appear to increase rates of colon and stomach cancer as I | recall. | | I read something years ago about how as the Japanese population | adapted a more western diet, heaps of ailments came upon them | as you'd expect, but their salt intake declined so dramatically | that they stopped experiencing stroke and GI tract cancers | nearly as much. | | I think you'd need to pin down just how much salt was causing | those issues though and then ask if the benefits of the salty | fermented foods outweigh the current problem of having depleted | gut microbiomes and atrocious diets. | | So, I'm certainly not suggesting everyone avoid salty fermented | foods. I eat (and make) a fair amount myself and as I alluded | above, I suspect it's better for me than eating food that is, | on balance, worse for me. | | There's no perfect diet, but there are clearly worse diets. I | try to avoid the latter. | f38zf5vdt wrote: | Seems unlikely. A lot of the traditional West African diet is | fermented and they have the lowest rates of colon cancer on | Earth. Smoked foods and foods containing nitrates/nitrates | are correlated with stomach and colon cancer, but not salty | or fermented foods. Studies that show a correlation of salt | intake with cancer are very possibly confusing intake of | smoked meat or processed meat (also high in salt) with colon | cancer. For example, when adjusting for processed meat, one | study finds that salt is not correlated at all with colon | cancer. [1] | | [1] https://www.clinicalnutritionjournal.com/article/S0261-56 | 14(... | giardini wrote: | Eating yogurt or sauerkraut will not render you (once again) | lactose tolerant. | | Lactase (the enzyme that breaks down lactose) production is | regulated by a human gene; how would a probiotic like yogurt | alter a gene? | | https://biologydictionary.net/lactase/ | etiam wrote: | Well, as you probably know, genes are regulated more or less | according to environmental cues all the time, including being | very much subject to presence and behavior of | commensals/parasites/symbionts. | | I don't know any specific data whatsoever about inducing | lactase, but it seems perfectly plausible that microorganisms | such as lactic acid bacteria could interact with the system. | msbarnett wrote: | This has been studied, but the results tend to argue that | it's purely genetic, eg) | | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669050/ | | > Studies that have measured changes in endogenous lactase | activity after an intervention period consistently show a | lack of enzyme induction, suggesting that lactose intake | does not affect an individual's lactase activity. Although | these studies are scarce and have relatively few subjects, | data from cross-sectional studies support the theory of | purely genetic regulation | barkingcat wrote: | You could always ingest other bacteria that can digest and | break down lactose and rely on probiotics to digest the | lactose for you instead of having a gene. | | That's what ruminents do anyways, you need a steady colony of | these helpful bacteria or you lose the tolerance. While that | seems troublesome, for many animals that's how metabolism | works for their entire life. | p10_user wrote: | Epigenetic reversal of some inhibitory histone marks at the | promoter region of the enzyme? Driven by some yet-to-be- | discovered signaling cascade induced by reintroduction of | lactose and proliferation of lactose loving microbes? | | Just spitballing, this is pure speculation, but is plausible. | Terry_Roll wrote: | Chlorine, chlorinated water, chlorinated (bleached) flour, | chlorinated chickens.... | | Which is why its consigned to the conspiracy books. | ryanianian wrote: | What? | msbarnett wrote: | > People are becoming even lactose intolerant. | | This isn't new, and certainly isn't some crisis of the last 100 | years. Historically only a minority of the planet has ever been | lactase persistent into adulthood. It's a well-understood | genetic trait, not some product of gut microbes. | dannyw wrote: | You can think of this being evolutionary beneficial, if some | milk is bad, the whole village don't all get sick. | | Also a possible reason for why people have different taste | preferences. | msbarnett wrote: | It's probably simpler than that: it's simply not energy- | efficient to keep producing an enzyme throughout its life | for a sugar that's rare-to-non-existent in an organism's | diet for most of that life. Because mammals don't have any | means of obtaining milk once they separate from their | mother, lactose intolerance for their lifetime after | weaning is almost universal among mammals. | | Humans are odd in that they harvest milk for consumption at | all beyond our own mother's, which is probably why we're | the only species with a notable population with the genetic | mutation that allows some of us to digest it - there's no | competitive advantage to that mutation in most other | mammals, because where would they even obtain milk? | db1234 wrote: | Could this explain trends like increasing food allergies in | countries where more and more people are becoming urban dwellers? | prometheus76 wrote: | There's a guy (Jasper Lawrence, who had a horrible allergy | problem) had heard of a study where they were testing to see if | allergies was related to parasites. He was rejected from the | study, so, long story short, he ended up flying to northern | Africa and walking around barefoot to get hookworm. He now | monitors and manages his hookworm infection with low doses of | anti-parasite medication, and he sells soil infected with | hookworms so that you, too, can get infected by hookworm and | reduce/eliminate your allergies. Oh, and his allergies are | gone. | | I read about it here: https://www.ksl.com/article/20838871/man- | infects-self-with-h... | | But there are lots of stories and some studies on the subject | as well. The original hypothesis was proposed in 1989 by David | P Strachan. According to the theory, many modern diseases have | gotten out of hand and are rapidly growing in industrialized | western countries because of chlorinated drinking water, | vaccines, antibiotics and the sterile environment of early | childhood. Moreover, it is theorized that since we have become | so good at preventing infections, we have upset the internal | balance and ecology in our bodies. One missing element of | hyper-clean and sterile environments is that our inflammatory | responses do not function as they should. Parasites and | bacteria play a symbiotic role in preserving our health. | noodles_nomore wrote: | He originally posted his story on kuro5hin[1]. It's an | interesting read. He was interested in the worm because, for | its survival, it has evolved a mechanism to disable the | host's immune system in a particular way that eliminates | allergies. At the time he wrote that nobody knows how the | worm does it. Now that we can do similar things with | monoclonal antibodies, I wonder if the mechanism is similar. | | [1] http://web.archive.org/web/20151205143301/http://www.kuro | 5hi... | woodruffw wrote: | Please, for the love of all that is good and holy, do not | give yourself hookworms. | seraphsf wrote: | I know a person who contracted a transient parasite | infection, possibly hookworm, while doing research in Africa | and walking around barefoot. In the decade+ since, they've | suffered terribly from debilitating and incurable auto-immune | diseases brought on by the initial parasite infection. | | So, YMMV. | prometheus76 wrote: | I agree that caution is in order. The question above just | reminded me of the story so I thought I'd pass it along | because it was from 2012. | CodeBeater wrote: | I can only imagine how desperate he must have been. Truly | debilitating levels of allergy. | epgui wrote: | It's not impossible, and it might even be plausible... But it's | a really, really difficult question. | | People outside of science: don't make the mistake of thinking | that scientists haven't thought about this before! haha | bejelentkezni wrote: | What is that supposed to mean? | monocasa wrote: | That it's certainly a valid thought with the information we | have, and is being thought about, but requires further | investigation to make an affirmative statement. | timfsu wrote: | Guessing that this means there are a lot of confounding | variables other than gut biome (environment, diet, | genetics, etc) that are very difficult to isolate to prove | causation, as opposed to correlation. | wheelerof4te wrote: | lnxg33k1 wrote: | Well of course it's obvious that we're not carnivorous our | ancestors didn't eat meat and always used to go to the | pharmacy to get their iron and B vitamin supplements | wheelerof4te wrote: | Plenty of both iron and vitamin B in plant-based food. | | You really believe we hunted big game so much? With what? | Sticks and stones? How did we catch them with our weak | legs? How the hell did we skin them or eat their raw flesh? | Cooking wasn't a thing for a long time. | | And why don't we eat the animal meat raw? Don't you love it | when you see the dead, rotting carcas all open and blody? | | I sure don't. And neither would you, unless you were | starving in the middle of winter. | lnxg33k1 wrote: | I don't know I meet a lot of people that say that there | is a lot of iron and B in plants but all the vegan I met | working were always taking supplements, maybe if you tell | me what are the plants with B12 and iron I can pass over | the info next time I see one of them | wheelerof4te wrote: | There is abundance of iron in spinach, nettle and other | similar plants. | | For the b12 needs, eat some algae or even dirt. Yes, | dirt. Plenty of dirt on a plant's root, which ancient | humans ate like no tomorrow. | lnxg33k1 wrote: | Eating dirt seems much more natural than eating animals, | I guess they discovered the fire to cook the dirt then, i | guess tonight I found the reason why vegans are full of | shit :D | | Ps just searched for 'dirt b12' on ddg and the first | website is an ad for b12 supplements | fosk wrote: | Humans used to exhaust their prey. Once the prey is | exhausted - in the absence of better tools - pick a rock | and hit the head of the animal until it dies. | | There are videos of animals (like deers) so exhausted | they just sit there while a lion eats them alive: they | are not moving, they are not standing up, they are just | sitting there watching another animal eating their guts | alive. Just like that. | | You can eat meat raw as long as it's fresh (just killed), | likewise we eat raw fish as long as it's fresh. Carpaccio | is raw meat, for example, and very popular too. | | We were eating less meat - for sure - since cutting and | digesting raw meat takes longer. But I guess we were also | eating less of everything to begin with. | bmj wrote: | Requisite xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1471/ ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-06-30 23:00 UTC)