[HN Gopher] Design lessons from guitar pedals ___________________________________________________________________ Design lessons from guitar pedals Author : williamsmj Score : 98 points Date : 2022-07-01 16:29 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (uxdesign.cc) (TXT) w3m dump (uxdesign.cc) | elpescado wrote: | One can say that stomp boxes follow UNIX philosophy. They do one | thing and can be connected ("piped") to make complex sounds. For | example, if you want distortion, with some modulation (say, some | phaser) and a little bit of a delay, you could build a pedalboard | ("pipeline") with those three units plugged one into another: | guitar | distortion | phaser | delay | amp | | BTW. in real life, as - by some weird convention - most of pedals | have input in right side and output on the left, it looks like | that: amp | guitar ^ .-- phaser <--. | | | | | | `-- delay | <--, `-- distortion <--' | jameshart wrote: | Re the weird convention: When you're a right handed guitarist | and you're facing towards your pedals, the lead comes out of | your guitar going to the right. | | That's irrelevant if your pedals are in an FX loop, but if | they're actually between the guitar and the amp, it makes | perfect sense to avoid having your guitar lead trail across or | catch under your stompboxes. | jdontillman wrote: | That's exactly right. | | Not a weird convention at all. | weinzierl wrote: | _" When we spoke, he told me how deeply he admires the interface | design of musical equipment like guitar pedals."_ | | Keyboardist here, so I cannot say much about guitar pedals, but I | very much agree in general. Of course there is a ton of bad UI | design also, but I think well designed musical instruments beat | the best designs in other areas. | | For example: I have a modern digital stage piano. It's a computer | with several gigs of RAM an yet the _whole_ manual is like _eight | pages_. This is the complete manual, not some quick start guide. | | While it's no DAW it's not simple either, you can do a lot with | it and still my child uses it without ever looking in the manual. | marshray wrote: | I used to think classical musical instruments were the epitome | of design because they evolved to their function over hundreds | of years. | | But then I started trying to learn to play one and began | reading about the problems with physical injury that | professional musicians persistently face. I realized musical | instruments were full of design compromises like everything | else. | asdff wrote: | A perfect instrument is physically impossible imo. There is | always going to be a compromise because you are playing with | fingers and their limited range of motion versus pure | thoughts. | quartesixte wrote: | _cries in the strained neck of a violinist_ | dfox wrote: | One UX issue that I've seen on most stage pianos is that while | there are direct physical controls for most of the commonly | used functionality due to lack of display and some menu system | configuring "uncommon" things (like MIDI) leads to totally | undiscoverable configuration modes, multi button chords and | what not that you have to read the manual to find out. | weinzierl wrote: | This is so true, especially for master keyboards. Mine is a | stage piano and it kind of side-steps this issue by having | only a very simple MIDI setup. For a piano that is not meant | to be the control center of everything else this is ok. | | If anyone knows a good master keyboard that has solved this | issue satisfactorily, I'm all ears. | squeaky-clean wrote: | > This makes sense, right? Guitar pedals are, after all, a | technology that you are supposed to step on. And not in some | gentle, delicate manner! | | I remember getting a guitar pedal for Christmas when I was like | 16 or so. My dad did not believe me that you were supposed to | step on them, and was angry at me for mistreating his gift, lol. | I showed him footage of real bands doing that and he told me | "Yeah and Hendrix used to light his guitar on fire on stage, but | you're not doing that either." He thought it was a stage trick. | | A well made pedal does feel great though. I still have a Boss | pedal from 1988 that works with no repairs. Wish all of them were | that durable, the DL4 is notable for having connections come | apart internally after about a year. Easy fix, but sucks if it | happens on stage. | | Point #3 is a big deal, especially being easily readable on stage | in no light or lights in your face. I have the Lillian Phaser | pictured in #5 and had to put tape over the blue LEDs because | they are so bright they blind you when you look down. This isn't | an issue specific to the Lillian either. From what I understand, | blue LEDs are much brighter than the rest, and most designers | don't take any steps to dim them. | unwind wrote: | Uh, I'm not anything with regards to music (and sometimes, I | guess, I'm a cranky dad) but isn't it kind of obvious that | you're not going to be using your hands to manipulate | something, if you're _playing guitar_ at the same time? Also, | the product is called a _pedal_, isn 't that kind of a clue- | stick? | | Not to talk down you dad, obviously, but it seems like such a | strange thing to not "get". :( I guess I'm sorry for your sake, | that you didn't get to enjoy the gift fully. | leetcrew wrote: | it is an interesting phenomenon that people can have such | strong opinions about things they have no interest in | actually learning about. | | reminds me of when I was planning my first gaming PC build as | a teenager. my dad kept going on about how "it's great that | you're planning something that can run all these games, but | have you made sure it will be able to run ms word for | school?" I tried to explain many times that 3D games require | (by a large margin) a superset of the resources needed to run | word, but all he heard was that I didn't care much about | school. | tshaddox wrote: | I mean at least your example is something that isn't | plainly obvious from the widely-known definitions of words. | The pedal example is literally someone being upset about | using a pedal as a pedal. | ksaj wrote: | They're even called foot pedals, so the hint is in there | twice. | dwringer wrote: | I have definitely broken a couple by stepping on them a | bit aggressively in my youth, but that's all part of the | rock and roll process. | ksaj wrote: | Yes, for example the FAB line is probably the anti-stomp | box. They're mostly plastic, so you would definitely | break them after a few good gigs. | | Some wah pedals are notorious for breaking down from even | "standard" use. Especially the kind that have a plastic | "zip tie" mechanism. | tshaddox wrote: | > They're even called foot pedals | | Which is actually weird and redundant, since foot | operation is literally the definition of "pedal." Foot | operation is the _defining_ and _only_ characteristic of | a pedal. It 's even plainly obvious in the etymology of | the word. | squeaky-clean wrote: | On the box it usually doesn't call it a pedal, just something | like Boss DS-1 distortion. | | Don't worry I stomped on it while jamming with a band. But at | home it was on the desk :p | CyberDildonics wrote: | This seems more like a jogged memory than anything relevant to | link. | [deleted] | ksaj wrote: | It probably doesn't matter now, but all LED's have a resistor | connected to them so they don't just burn out. You can desolder | it and put a different one in. Since it isn't a critical piece, | you can touch contact a few different ones until you get the | level of dimness you want. | ironmagma wrote: | > When I'm driving, I do not want to have to glance at a screen | to figure out how to turn down the damn air conditioning. | | This is my #1 complaint about modern cars. It's like the | designers don't know about the epidemic of distracted driving. | sbf501 wrote: | I'm surprised the author didn't discuss actual electronics. Early | BOSS pedals in the 80's were wonders of analog design. Check out | the schematics of the chorus, flanger, and phaser. They are | delightful to study: | | https://elektrotanya.com/PREVIEWS/63463243/23432455/boss/bos... | | https://www.hobby-hour.com/electronics/s/boss-bf2-flanger.ph... | | There's a reason why the ratio of analog to digital designers is | about 1:1000. | javchz wrote: | Love when we go back to physical items to get lessons for GUIs. | | "The design of everyday things" it's an amazing book to start in | this area, specially if you work with something that mix hardware | and software like IoT. | beardedman wrote: | I really don't like articles like these. The author takes a cute | analogy and turns it into guiding principals. | | > Physical UIs can be more intuitive and usable than screens | | Physical UIs also don't need to help the user navigate digital | content. Hugely different to physical content. | | > When tech is rugged, it's a joy to use | | It is? I would say that when tech accomplishes its job of | connecting the user with the purpose of the tool (in an easy way) | - then it's a joy to use. Ruggedness can be a boon here, sure. | | Personally, as a musician, I've never been on stage and given | preference to knobs & dials - I've given it to the sound and what | I want the audience to experience with my playing or a song - not | the joy of me stomping something. | | Bit of a rant, sorry about that. But these sorts of "full of | content, but no message" articles bug me. | jrm4 wrote: | Honestly, modern UX is frequently _so stupid_ that, apparently, | articles this simple are necessary. | | Lookin' at you, Tesla touchscreen. | beckerdo wrote: | "Physical UIs also don't need to help the user navigate digital | content. Hugely different to physical content." | | Consider the Beat Buddy pedal (automated drum accompaniment | pedal) which can play lots of digital content via user | commands. Yes the foot commands are limited ("add a fill", | "splash sound", "next phrase", "end song"), and so are the | dials ("choose playlist", "change tempo"). However, the proper | stomping really helps if you want to add an extra solo or just | chill with a beat while you tell a story. | copperx wrote: | > Guitar pedals are aesthetically gorgeous. | | The writer lost me here. Sure, some have beautiful artwork. But | pedals themselves are perhaps the ugliest contraptions I have | laid my eyes on. Just look at the form of BOSS pedals. As always, | there are a few exceptions. But in general, guitar pedals are an | eyesore. To make matters worse, musicians put them on pedalboards | in all sorts of kitsch arrangements. When you couple that with | the pathological American dislike of feet and everything | associated with feet, you end up with an object only worthy of | contempt. | elpescado wrote: | What's so bad about Boss pedals. I _love_ how they look. Their | retro-futuristic vibe (it's genuine vibe, they haven't changed | since 80s). | MDGeist wrote: | I also love Boss pedals, so many pedals now are the same | rectangular box in one of two common sizes. At least the Boss | ones are unique! | marshray wrote: | What is this part about a "pathological American dislike of | everything associated with feet"? | | I've lived here my whole life and never heard of this. | quartesixte wrote: | Recent developments in certain sub-sections of internet media | definitely point to the exact opposite, in fact. | copperx wrote: | No, that's just a small niche. Shaming barefoot people is | now a national pastime. Especially in airplanes and | offices. | quartesixte wrote: | What on earth since when o_o | copperx wrote: | Here's one example: | | https://borntolivebarefoot.org/hate-sites-promote- | shaming-of... | | And here's one person's experience: | | https://www.reddit.com/r/barefoot/comments/vnnbpz/cover_y | our... | asdff wrote: | Yeah because for the type of people who feel the need to | ventillate their foot in the middle of the day in the | workplace or in an airplane do not exactly have odorless | sweat. When was foot odor tolerated? The 1800s? | dhagz wrote: | I get where you're coming from, but I think you're expecting | too much from the "form" part of design, when guitar pedals are | basically pushed entirely towards "function". There's obviously | a spectrum (Walrus Audio, Earthquaker Devics for two that | manage good function and good form), but BOSS pedals are | beautiful to me in just how easy they are to use - that big ol' | flap covering the switch makes it to where I have to try | _really_ hard to not turn the pedal on when I stomp on it. And | that's the primary thing I want to do with a pedal - turn it | off and on. BOSS's pedals actually very literally are laid out | in proportion to how I use them - the dials get maybe 20-25% of | the enclosure's usable space, while the rest is dedicated to | making it easy to do the thing I care about. It might be | brutalist and basically entirely function over form, but | there's beauty in just how usable it is. | levicole wrote: | I just want to say you missed Chase Bliss when mentioning | good function and good form. Especially their Automotone | series pedals (e.g. CXM1978 and their preamp). I find all of | their pedals aesthetically pleasing and easy to use (with | some bit of mystery akin to Eurorack like another commenter | mentioned) | bravoetch wrote: | The interface is good, only because nobody has no ads / attention | economy shit in the chain. Without that anti-pattern incentive we | can wax lyrical about the joys of using something. Joy of use is | still the objective. | | When a company like eight-sleep decides to make pedals, there | will be an app with a subscription, and 'content' and extra | features for a fee, like 'adjust volume'. You'll get multiple | emails every week with a breakdown of your 'pedal data' and | suggestions for improving it - 'buy this accessory button!'. | Bla.. I hate the internet. | colmmacc wrote: | As a gigging musician I've found that pedals aren't without their | own UI/UX problems. Nearly every pedal has a gain control ... but | they can interact in non-linear ways. Tiny changes make a bigger | difference when the overall-gain is low, compared a chain with | more amplification. When you're plugging into a venue desk (and | not going through an on-stage Amp) ... it can be a nightmare | trying to figure out what combination of gain settings and pads | would work. Worse is that important parts of that are often | hidden; pads are usually toggles just hidden on the side. And | there's no feedback UX ... I'd love a simple VU meter on a DI or | EQ-stage pedal for example (Studio V3 tube amp pedals have this, | but it's not common). I have hundreds of photos on my phone of my | pedal board memorializing the settings for a particular song, | piece, or venue .... because good luck saving state across | multiple pedals. Strymon have their own standard for this, but | there's not much inter-operable, or you can spend on a multi- | thousand dollar multi-effects pedal. Anyway, I could rant for | hours about pedal UX. | | But yes, way better than my Tesla. | pfortuny wrote: | I am by no means a musician. This friend brought me his guitar | pedal because he could not fix it (got stuck somehow and he had | not read the manual properly, that's it). | | After "fixing" it, he showed me how he used it (I had never seen | one in use). | | Those are true marvels of UI/UX. It was possibly one of the | simplest pedals, but the things you can do with it and just "one" | button. Unbelievable. | tonymet wrote: | If you get a chance, drive a car from the 90s, especially a fully | mechanical one (mechanical transmission, windows). Once you get | adjusted, you'll find that you're almost totally relaxed while | driving. There are few controls, and the ones that are there are | immediately responsive & tactile. | asdff wrote: | Modern cars are so numb. Engineers have worked hard to remove | all sense of tactile inputs and feedback. My 2000 manual acura | I could drive blind. I could feel intimate details of the road | surface through the wheel, and exactly what rpm I was at | through the pedals and the shifter especially (to a lesser | extent the wheel and seat as well because the entire car would | vibrate). Put snow tires on and go out in a blizzard and you | are in complete control of all things. You feel the minute | traction slips, you feel how it feels when it comes back, you | feel what its like to hold traction and maintain control versus | letting it go. You become a much better driver. | | Unfortunately due to some circumstances I am saddled with a | 2018 era econobox that feels like its made by fisher price, but | should my finances change the first thing I'm doing is buying | something old enough to order its own drinks. Peak car was 25 | years ago. We had our 35mpg by then and side curtain airbags. | We are on the decline. Buy these assets now while they are | still under 25 grand or be forever lusting in the decades from | now when no sensible car is made anymore and all the decent | used stock is going to collector auctions instead of used car | lots. | stakkur wrote: | I'm a musician, but not a music tech expert. However, most | professional guitarists/bassists I know who play larger venues | are using an effects rack, not a board of pedals (or maybe a | pedal or two to switch effects). This has waxed and wanted in | popularity since the 80s, but my anecdotal evidence is that pedal | rigs are less common than ever. I agree about the rugged design, | though--I still use a chorus pedal from the late 80s, and it's | nigh indestructible. | khazhoux wrote: | Without any data except watching countless youtube videos, the | only place I see racks is for big stadium acts (U2 and the | like) where it's a huge production and a lot of different tones | need to be changed out. But by and large, I otherwise see a ton | of pedal rigs for even well-known professionals, indie bands, | and of course non-pros. | | We're probably right now at a high point of pedal usage and new | releases, thanks to super-engaging YouTubers like That Pedal | Show, Andertons, Andy Martin, J Leonard J, Pete Thorn, and the | list just goes on. | ksaj wrote: | Some effects are better on rack. For example, delay doesn't | immediately cut off when you switch it off. | | But you're right. A lot of modern guitar players use racks - | even Tony Iommi from Black Sabbath does these days. Pretty much | the only stomp box you're most likely to see on the floor even | with rack users, is an overdrive. | motohagiography wrote: | It starts with guitar pedals, but once you get into eurorack | synth modules, the UX is completely fascinating. Counter to the | article's emphasis on obvious a clear functions, some of them are | as mystifying as your first encounter with a unix command line, | but once you get them going, holy crap. The depth of information | you get from a synth is (literaly) infinite compared to what you | get from text or images on a screen. | LegitShady wrote: | what depth of information are you talking about? the synth | outputs sound. It might have a small screen. there may be knobs | with number scales. but overall you aren't taking a ton of | information out of a synth. | swatcoder wrote: | I don't know what exactly the OP means by depth of | information, but modular synthesis is a lot richer than what | you describe. | | You may be pulling in signals from bananas (literally), | driving them through a dozen modules with three times as many | patch cables and using them to drive a video signal and a few | stepper motors alongside your audio out. | | And you're doing it with a lot of bespoke little modules made | in small batches, sometimes with faults, and almost always | capable of things that were neither envisioned or documented | by their original designer. | | It's a whole different world than guitar pedals or even a | single big commercial synth (which is what your description | sounds like). | hluska wrote: | If you like synthesizers, I'd strongly suggest checking out | one of the synths op talked about. They're an immense amount | of fun and are closer to an IDE than say, a Juno-106. | scarecrowbob wrote: | So, I have a very nice synth made by AMS, the Hydrasynth. | | It's not a modular synth, but quite the opposite... it's a | digital synth which is more like a computer than, say, a | minimoog. | | It has a great UI and much of what it does it shows you very | well. | | Still, it has a massive modulation matrix, in which the 5 | LFOs and the 5 Envelopes can be sent about anywhere, often | controlling the 3 oscillators or the 2 filters. | | And in order to actually see the 10 or so setting for each of | those 10 modulators going to the myriad of places that they | could go (and noting that you can route the oscilators | themselves to various points) you have to have both some | willingness to dive around the small menus or some knowledge | of how the patch was created. | | That's nicely facilitated by the UI which has a lot of nice | buttons for quickly selecting element, but still. | | By contrast, you can look at your modular synth and see the | physical connections which reveal the routing of the patch. | While there are all kinds of things that can hide the | complexity such as normalized connections within devices or | devices that have their own micro-controllers doing who knows | what, the network of wires is, itself, quite a lot of | information. | bashinator wrote: | The kind of synth's GP is talking about generally have no | screen, dozens to hundreds of knobs and sliders, and dozens | to hundreds of audio inputs and outputs for routing the | signal. | mgdlbp wrote: | Don't forget the most common pedal-controlled electric (and now | electronic) appliance, the sewing machine! In that case, the | speed control pedal was a natural development from earlier | machines powered by treadles and bicycle-like pedals. There's a | parallel in flexible-shaft rotary tools (basically high-end | Dremels), which also require simultaneous continuous speed | control while both hands are occupied with the work being done. | The lack of this requirement is probably why the other machines | that were pedal-powered prior to electrification--grinders, saws, | (dental) drills, and lathes--did not retain pedal controls. | | Other "edge-case" pedals: | | - various vehicles | | - foot-operated computer mice, for accessibility | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footmouse) | | - elsewhere in music: piano, timpani, kick drum, and harp; organs | (and rare pianos) with _pedal_ keyboards (in etymological | contrast to _manual_ keyboards) | mhfs wrote: | > Physical UIs can be more intuitive and usable than screens | | A thousand times this. | | Not related to guitars, but I do a lot of off-roading and the | multimedia system is only controlled by the big screen. In bumpy | roads it's a trial and error operation to skip a song. Give me my | previous/next physical buttons back. | dizhn wrote: | My old portable CD player had perfected this skipping thing. | Didn't even need user input. | moron4hire wrote: | This is exactly why I bought a Mazda after loving my previous | Subaru to death. Between when I bought my Forester and when I | went to replace it, Subaru had gone all in on touch screen | interfaces. Meanwhile, Mazda had declared they would never, | citing studies they increase road hazard more than _drinking | alcohol_. | danielvaughn wrote: | It just seems so insane to me that cars are even _allowed_ to | have touch screens. The last thing I want to do is to be | _forced_ to take my eyes away from the road in order to push a | button on my dashboard. I 'll never buy a vehicle with a touch | screen. | asdff wrote: | Plus its like the worst touchscreen tech imaginable. Cars if | they are going to have a touchscreen, should have that 15 | year old blackberry storm touch screen tech with faux button | haptics. | trasz wrote: | The UI is fantastic once you figure out that the pedals are to be | wired exactly backwards, with input on the right side, output on | the left. | analog31 wrote: | And negative on the center terminal of the power supply plug. | dwringer wrote: | Always double check this, there are still some exceptions. | analog31 wrote: | The worst one on the bandstand is the 12 V supply for | keyboards, which are center-positive. | | I opened up one effects pedal once, and an electrolytic | capacitor had completely blown its top off, and the | contents were spewed throughout the enclosure. | marshray wrote: | Those easily-detached non-locking barrel jacks for power are | definitely the weak point of guitar pedal design. | asdff wrote: | Not hard to do considering many pedals have a label for input | and output | jrajav wrote: | This signal flow is only backwards if you're left-handed (like | a lot of the world). | | If you're right-handed, imagine you just plugged in your guitar | and then tossed the cable off to one side. You probably just | chucked it to the right, away from the plug. Now look down at | your pedalboard, right in front of you. The signal flow | probably starts most naturally on the right side, near where | you just tossed your cable. | subroutine wrote: | The article doesn't mention this, but in my experience playing | live gigs the full pedal stomp (1) is significantly better than | dimple button style stomp (2). In fact, for me, it's a | dealbreaker if a pedal has a dimple stomp. I'm curious if other | ppl feel similarly. | | 1. | https://www.roland.com/RolandComSite/media/uk/images/article... | | 2. https://delicious-audio.com/wp- | content/uploads//2016/01/Iban... | resonator wrote: | I chose a pedal based on the sound it produces not how it feels | to use. I like the feel of the full buttons, but my board | doesn't have any. Until now I've never even thought about it. | So no, it's not at all a dealbreaker for me. If it were, it | would severely limit my choices. | ksaj wrote: | Those mini-pedals pretty much only come with "dimple stomps," | as do most wah pedals under the rocker. | | My board has quite a mix of each format. Of course the Klon | Klone has a dimple, but I like Boss pedals for their | durability. Those switches are actually cheap plastic, but the | part you stomp on limits you from crushing it. | nathias wrote: | screens are just cost saving devices, knobs and buttons are | always much better to use | kennywinker wrote: | Other ux points he didn't include: | | One knob per option, not deep menu diving. | | One pedal per function, not one pedal to rule them all. | ksaj wrote: | That's only partly true. There are a lot of foot pedals that | emulate the whole chain, and some of them even do speaker | emulation. They tend to be at a minimum double-width and often | have a wah that also can act as a volume rocker. | | But for the standard pedals, you are totally right. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-01 23:00 UTC)