[HN Gopher] What's the deal with all those weird wrong-number te... ___________________________________________________________________ What's the deal with all those weird wrong-number texts? Author : minimaxir Score : 256 points Date : 2022-07-01 17:25 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (maxread.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (maxread.substack.com) | teeray wrote: | I love trolling these scammers by being the right number they | never expected. One time I had one looking for a price list on | precious materials. I sent them prices for Adamantium, Tiberium, | and Xen crystal. The confusion was fantastic. | spc476 wrote: | Two weeks ago I received an email saying I had funds in Bitcoin | and I could cash out, with login details for a website account | [1]. I knew this must be a scam, but for the life of me, I | couldn't figure out the angle. Now I'm thinking it's a similar | type of scam. | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ_flb9tGuc | WalterSear wrote: | Probably a wallet drainer. Connect it with your wallet and | empties it. | | https://blog.confiant.com/how-one-crypto-drainer-template-fa... | kccqzy wrote: | Any person who is remotely knowledgeable about bitcoin should | know that there is no need to "connect your wallet" or reveal | your private key to receive bitcoins. To receive, you only | need the address which is basically a public key. | bee_rider wrote: | Ah, about 20 years ago I think a relative responded to a, I think | it was, an "I'm here at the airport, don't see you anywhere" kind | of email. This was before spam filters got good, so that email | address was basically kaput. | Apocryphon wrote: | I often do respond to such messages pretending I am the person | they're trying to reach. It confuses them and they stumble over | their script. | rdtsc wrote: | That's what I do when I am bored. I figure if I can keep | engaged a bit longer they'll have less time to scam others. | cdelsolar wrote: | I basically just send them all a big copy-pasta full of banned | Chinese terms like 6/4, Free Tibet, Tiananmen Square, Winnie the | Pooh, etc; they often leave me alone after that or act confused | wpietri wrote: | This warms my heart! I'm going to start pretending like I know | them, sending Wikipedia links to those topics, and asking what | they think. | ElijahLynn wrote: | Well researched for sure, good read as I had some of these | recently too and am glad now to understand more about it. | | What I do want to highlight is the deeper "why", and that is | "why" are these people doing this? There must be a fundamental | survival mechanism here, in a larger chain. These people may not | have opportunities, the ones holding others captive. What kind of | environment is needed to create this type of behavior? Surely we | must address that at the core of it all. I think it comes down to | basic resources, and this is where I think the vision of Jacque | Fresco and The Venus Project can come into play. Which is to | create a resource-based economy and evolve as a civilization to | taking care of one another, it is a form of democratic socialism, | which I think can solve this type of issue, and help us all be | more integrated and happier. | kelnos wrote: | I feel like if someone has the resources to kidnap a bunch of | people and hold them captive in a large, heavily-guarded office | building, while forcing them to scam people over the internet, | they probably have the resources to do something not-scammy. | | Stuff like this just erodes my faith in humanity. Humans are | not fundamentally good. So many people want to prey on the weak | or gullible, not only because it can be easy and lucrative, but | because they get off on that kind of power dynamic. | RajT88 wrote: | I had one of these exchanges recently which I had some fun with, | because it was so weird, and they made a point to use a photo of | a beautiful woman: | | Lady: Doctor Lucy? My puppy is very slow and does not eat dog | food, can you make an appointment for me? | | Me: Unfortunately I do not treat puppies. Only adult dogs, | adolescent foxes, and elderly coyotes. | | Lady: Sorry, I added the wrong person, I just checked the number | and I saved the wrong number for Dr. Lucy. | | I left it at that. I wonder if I should try and bait the scammer. | I do love messing with scammers. After the last message I was | thinking maybe it was legitimately a wrong number. | jesterpm wrote: | These, and the spoofed number phone calls where the other side | just hangs up when you answer. For the phone calls, I just | assumed that someone was trying to build a database of phone | numbers that do or do not answer for some other/future purpose... | chefandy wrote: | Based on the delays in these sorts of calls, I'd guess that | they're robocalls which dial way more numbers than they have | operators for and try to filter out no-answer and voicemail | pickups automatically. Then if you pick up, they route you to | an operator. If there's no operator available, it just drops | the call rather than reveal which annoying company just wasted | your time. That way the operators-- clearly the most expensive | link in the chain -- are always engaged. Just a guess though! | | Even if that's wrong, I'm sure you're right that they collect | caller-pick-up stats. I imagine even cursory vetting would | dramatically increase the resale value of their lead list. | musesum wrote: | South African YouTuber with Chinese wife, and thus knows the | language, plays along: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ_flb9tGuc | tintor wrote: | This would be a great way to monetize GPT-3! | | (this is a joke) | muststopmyths wrote: | I got one of these, almost convincing enough except she said she | lived in SF. I asked where in SF and she said Alcatraz. I almost | wanted to keep the conversation going just to hear more about her | life on the island | themaninthedark wrote: | Almost sounds like a cry for help. O_o Probably not though. | walrus01 wrote: | I am ordinarily loathe to link to reddit, but | | https://reddit.com/r/scams | | has a wealth of information and examples of these | johnklos wrote: | Simple: it's time to stop using phone numbers. | | I use Apple's Messages. If someone spams me, I report them. | They're blocked and have to go through the extra work of setting | up a new account to try again. | | Compare this with, say, Google. Gmail lets spammers / scammers | have limitless accounts and they don't do shit when an account is | reported for spam. You can block and report Gmail spammers all | day long and you'll get nowhere. | | WhatsApp apparently still uses phone numbers, and they're owned | by a company that wants engagement at ANY price. Are any of us | really so dumb that we think they're going to do the right thing? | ntoskrnl wrote: | I'd give anything to get rid of my phone, but almost everyone | you do business with (DMV, electric/gas/water company, etc) | expects you to have one. Same thing with USPS and their paper | spam. At this point they're little more than government- | mandated spam delivery channels. Private companies are handling | the spam situation infinitely better. | 0des wrote: | You aren't mandated to have mail or phone. | | Edit: Noting a lot of downvotes on this comment, which is | odd. I can only conclude one thing- don't be Amish on HN. | | Perhaps this could be an opportunity to explore a different | way of life, and a different community structure. It is not | all horse buggies and barns. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6SlJZk5guI&list=PLEyPgwIPkH. | .. | pessimizer wrote: | I'm pretty sure you are mandated to have mail in the US, or | rather the mails are mandated to deliver to you. IIRC it's | constitutional. | 0des wrote: | > I'm pretty sure you are mandated to have mail in the | US, or rather the mails are mandated to deliver to you. | IIRC it's constitutional. | | You'd be incorrect. Ask your postmaster. | criddell wrote: | They are correct. The USPS has a universal service | obligation. If you send a letter or parcel to any address | in the US, the post office must deliver it. | 0des wrote: | I respectfully disagree. The postal service is held to a | standard of service by a USO - Universal Service | Obligation. [0] | | This means it is an org mandated to accept your request | for service at a reasonable price regardless of your | location of residence. There is an important distinction | between that, and being mandated to receive mail service. | That is not a stipulation of being alive in USA. | | [0] - https://www.uspsoig.gov/blog/postal-service-and- | its-obligati... | zdragnar wrote: | Just imagine, every drifter, nomad and homeless person | were required to set up a mailbox. It's just silly. | nobody9999 wrote: | >Just imagine, every drifter, nomad and homeless person | were required to set up a mailbox. It's just silly. | | They don't have to. Just have mail sent to: | Joe/Jane Drifter General Delivery | TownNearWhereYouSquat, <State> <ZipCode of post office> | | Or at least that's how it's been done for decades. | ntoskrnl wrote: | Sure, I could move to the woods and live off wild berries | for the rest of my days. But if you want to be part of | modern society, your bank will mail you your credit card, | and your water company will text you a code to login and | pay. Realistically, what choice do you have? | the_only_law wrote: | > Sure, I could move to the woods and live off wild | berries for the rest of my days | | You'd probably just be removed from someones property | eventually. | 0des wrote: | Do you not encounter Amish people where you live? | ntoskrnl wrote: | I wasn't offended and didn't downvote you. But the Amish | do receive mail and use phones. | | First article I found: https://amishamerica.com/do-amish- | use-telephones/ | zdragnar wrote: | Every community decides for itself what technologies to | adapt. The nearest to me have a single phone booth in the | front yard of one member's house. Anyone wants to use the | phone, they go there to make a call, and most only use it | if they need to make an appointment at a hospital for | serious illnesses. | | Others not quite as close are a fair degree more liberal | in what they adopt, while I imagine there's probably a | few that are more strict. | 0des wrote: | > But the Amish do receive mail and use phones. | | I am assuming you don't mean to generalize to the degree | that is being conveyed at first glance in your explainer | comment. | | Amish people are not a monolith. As a culture it is quite | a spectrum, from Beachy to Swartzentruber. | ntoskrnl wrote: | My experience is based on visits to an Amish town in Ohio | when I was growing up in the 2000s. I distinctly remember | being surprised to see they used phones and rode in cars. | But that was a long time ago and only one town of many. I | didn't mean to generalize all Amish communities. | 0des wrote: | No worries. It takes all kinds. Who knows, maybe you re- | examine the culture and find some things you'd like to | take home to your community. | kube-system wrote: | I don't think I agree with that. I rarely get scams via USPS, | never get explicit or potentially damaging content, the | senders are all in my legal jurisdiction, and the spam | arrives once per day in a manageable format. Almost all of | the content is from businesses in my local area, businesses | that I have previously shopped at, or political ads. | | Electronically from private companies I frequently get a | larger volume of spam, malware, scams, explicit content, and | most of them originate outside of my legal jurisdiction to | evade the law. And it's a steady stream all day, on multiple | mediums. | | I'd take 10x the amount of spam in my mailbox if I could get | rid of all of the rest of the garbage I'm bombarded with. I | obviously would rather not have any of it, but the hoops you | have to jump through to send snail-mail inherently filters | out most of the worst garbage. | SoftTalker wrote: | I have the idea (maybe wrongly) that people don't often use | the USPS for scams because committing fraud by mail is a | federal crime, and the postal service actually has | inspectors with police powers who don't fool around once | they get on the scent. | xmprt wrote: | > I'd take 10x the amount of spam in my mailbox if I could | get rid of all of the rest of the garbage I'm bombarded | with | | I for one would not. Digital spam is easy to deal with. | There are automated filters, easy ways to block them, and | the few that slip through are simple to deal with. Mailbox | spam is physically painful to deal with and it's a massive | waste of paper. | kube-system wrote: | Email is the least of my problems. If you know of any | good filters for SMS, phone calls, LinkedIn, Snapchat, | Instagram, etc, I'd be very interested. I have to mute | all of them because it is a constant stream of garbage | from all of them. | rglullis wrote: | For Snapchat/LinkedIn/Instagram: just close your account | and put email filters? | krallja wrote: | Paper is a renewable resource, and also a carbon sink. | Throw it in the garbage and consider it carbon | sequestration. | SoftTalker wrote: | Unfortunately I'd bet that the paper production and | delivery to your mailbox emits much more carbon than the | paper itself sequesters. | seoaeu wrote: | Long term, the paper will decompose while sitting in the | landfill and then release the carbon back into the | atmosphere. Even temporary sequestration is beneficial, | but I don't know whether it is still a net positive once | you factor in the resources spent growing the wood, | mailing the paper, and transporting it to a landfill. | teawrecks wrote: | Apple Messages could have become an open standard to replace | SMS, but they deliberately chose not to in the interest of | locking in existing users, and locking out anyone too poor to | own an iPhone. I'm not exaggerating, this is public knowledge. | | https://old.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/mn2qyj/apple_decli... | | So which one is "owned by a company that wants engagement at | any price" again? | oefrha wrote: | These days I get a lot more spam through Apple services, mostly | in the form of iCloud shared albums, than I get SMS spam. | cglong wrote: | > Compare this with, say, Google. | | Google Messages proactively detects spam texts and sends them | to a spam folder, so I don't get notifications about these | messages at all :) | gnopgnip wrote: | Google voice has a poor shaken stir implementation that only | blocks the most egregious spam calls and sms and does not let | users choose to be more strict. It also does not support | blocking phone numbers by pattern/prefix. | quadyeast wrote: | Apple Messages breaks if you temporarily use a different phone | number on your cell. All chats in old threads were broken off | into different threads. It was a disaster. You would think that | since Apple knows this is still the same user that this would | not happen? | idiotsecant wrote: | I don't want one company to be the arbiter of all | communications everywhere. Phone numbers work fine. | eropple wrote: | Phone numbers have the same problem as email, though: because | "everyone" is responsible, no one is responsible. The deluge | of spam texts and calls to my public phone number is | genuinely unpleasant and frustrating to deal with as, like, | _a person living in the world_. | | I practically don't use email anymore for those reasons, and | a phone number hangs around only because right now I can't | not have one for legal-type reasons. | walrus01 wrote: | email, at least, you can fully implement your own antispam | solution in whatever way you want | | at one extreme, you can just point the mx records for your | domain at office365 or gsuite or similar and let them | handle it | | at the other extreme, you can point the mx records at your | own mailserver you admin yourself and do absolutely | anything you want with the incoming smtp mail flow for | antispam measures, sorting, filtering, categorization, risk | analysis. | | the ordinary person even if they work for a telecom | _cannot_ implement their own phone number at one of the | most fundamental levels of the pstn, because they don 't | run their own ss7 switch. | | if you control your own DID and interface with it from a | sip trunk to a trusted provider, running your own voip | system, you can do a lot with custom routing/antispam | measures on incoming call flow, but nowhere near to the | extent that you can with email. | rglullis wrote: | The way to solve this is by educating the people in your | network about better security practices, not by giving away | control over your communications just because of | "convenience". | eropple wrote: | "Just get everyone to be perfect, including random | companies who require a phone number for validation, and | if a single failure ever happens you're going to be | spammed forever in a way that is directly interruptive | and intrusive instead of one in a list of messages in a | queue." | | I don't know how to say this any more nicely than this: | this is a permanently losing solution with no redeeming | qualities to such a degree that it makes me wonder at how | in-good-faith the suggestion actually is with regards to | solving the stated problem. | rglullis wrote: | The point is not to "be perfect", the point is to raise | the standard of acceptable practices, to make it harder | to abuse it. | | Just as an example: phone numbers should not be used for | validation of anything as they are public. So companies | who are requiring phones for any kind of authentication | should be shamed into changing their practices, much like | we learned to not trust companies that stored passwords | in plain text, or use "recovery questions". | eropple wrote: | The abuse is that without sufficient guardrails a ten- | digit number can be used to bother me at all hours of the | day or night _unless_ I want to be less accessible to | people who I may need to hear from, _not_ that it 's used | as an authentication source (which, yeah, not great, but | also not the end of the world). | | Out-of-band authentication aside, a company is going to | retain my phone number to be able to contact me. So are | my parents. Somebody is also going to inevitably leak it | because _security is difficult_. Breaking the | capabilities of bad actors, then, is a requirement. You | have entirely ignored this in favor of blame-the-user | rhetoric and I can 't come up with a great reason why | you'd blame every user for a systemic failure other than | that the system cannot be repaired. | rglullis wrote: | > Somebody is also going to inevitably leak it because | security is difficult. | | Phone numbers were and will always be assumed to be | public. (Yellow pages are still a thing) | | > unless I want to be less accessible to people who I may | need to hear from. | | You don't need to be less accessible to anyone. Your | phone can and should be able to filter things for you. | | And is not just a matter of setting up number filtering, | I am talking about implementing changes in the | application layer. One could imagine, e.g, a phone app | that only rings if the caller provides a secret code | provided by you, effectively making you reachable by | phone number (public) + caller-specific code (private). | You could also make that if you have the code on your | addressbook, it sends it via DTMF after the call being | completed. | | > other than that the system cannot be repaired. | | It _can_ be repaired, it is just that the cost of these | changes might be too high if mandated for all network | operators. | | But even if the system couldn't be repaired, the solution | is not to encourage adoption of a proprietary solution. | Apple already controls way too much stuff, we shouldn't | give them _yet another_ monopoly for them to exploit. | narag wrote: | _I don 't want one company to be the arbiter of all | communications everywhere. Phone numbers work fine._ | | For me too and if there is an application that allows to | block numbers, spam is not a problem. | | Now I use the Google builtin caller app function. Most of the | spam numbers have already been marked as such by somebody | else. | | I'd rather program that myself than relying the functionality | to Google, I hope Pine or some other programmable phone gets | to a usable state some day. But as of now, it's good enough. | | Edit: I'm in Spain, not sure if that works the same in the | USA. | LinuxBender wrote: | I agree with this. | | For what it's worth my solution _which may not work for | others_ is to set the default ring /text tone to "None" and | then add custom ring/text tones in my address book on my | little throw away flip phone. It works great for me | personally. I never get distracted by bots and just mass | delete their messages without even looking at them when I get | around to it. This method probably will not work for people | glued to their phones. | xenophonf wrote: | I'm considering doing that to my personal email. Default | deny, whitelist known contacts, auto delete the junk mail | folder. If I didn't have friends and family using them, I'd | just outlook.com and gmail.com outright. It's frustrating | how much spam they send. | cronix wrote: | An android solution is to only ring/notify the phone for | people in your contacts. It's easier than giving | individuals a ring tone as unknowns get the silent | treatment by default. Basically just whitelist instead of | blacklist. | pbhjpbhj wrote: | It would be good if phone companies weren't quite so | complicit in hiding companies behind anonymous phone numbers, | and relaying numbers for which they don't have verified | origin info. | creeble wrote: | Supposedly today is the day that even the small carriers | that were previously exempt from not having to comply with | STIR/SHAKEN will now have to. | | But its meaninglessness is demonstrated by the fact that I | have received two spam calls (complete with "accurate" | caller ID) since starting to read these comments. | | So yeah. The phone companies are all complicit. | vorpalhex wrote: | And when Apple bans you.. what is your plan exactly? | verall wrote: | Do you just, not talk to people electronically who do not own | Apple devices? | jsmith45 wrote: | >Simple: it's time to stop using phone numbers. | | So don't be like Google Pay? (Which originally used proper | accounts but was switched to be based on phone numbers, | specifically because the new google pay was developed targeting | India, where phone number based login is considered normal | thanks to apps like WhatsApp.) | jthrowsitaway wrote: | Assuming you're talking about iMessage, comparing that to | E-mail (GMail) is literally apples and oranges. | ilololed wrote: | They're comparing it to SMS and voice calling on Android (and | apples and oranges are very similar) | CharlesW wrote: | I don't know how effective it is, but I report all SMS spam to | my carrier (for T-Mobile, send content to 7726). | | Does anyone here have inside knowledge about whether this does | any good? | Teever wrote: | Well you're still getting spam, so probably not? | CharlesW wrote: | Turns out there's more than one spammer. | walrus01 wrote: | saying stop using phone numbers and then going directly into | | "hey, use this one proprietary vendor's closed source walled | garden messaging app" | | is NOT a solution. | | people should be looking at things like Signal or custom | implementations of Matrix/Element/Synapse or similar if they | want real control of their two way chat communications. | johnklos wrote: | I'm sorry that you can't see how I could be making an | example. I didn't say anything like, "do this instead". I | said, "I've done this". | ctoth wrote: | Terrified to consider what happens when these scammers get hold | of large language models here in a year or so. Rather than fading | into the background as this article posits, I expect people to | have models finetuned on convincing them to make purchases/send | money. Probably trained by being pitted against other models | which have been trained on the mark's social media feeds. Train | the scambot to perfectly push your buttons by having it practice | against your own style of thought as embodied by your social | corpus. | cool_dude85 wrote: | They have, per the article, buildings full of slaves to do the | selling. I doubt GPT-4 will be able to compete on price with | that. | walrus01 wrote: | I am morbidly curious what the locations, salaries and | working conditions are like. Because obviously they have to | recruit people who have some basic level of English language | literacy, so that commands a bit of a wage premium (even in | India or Bangladesh) over truly unskilled labor. | ctoth wrote: | Per the article the scammers pay a minimum of $8,000/person, | plus cost to feed, imprison, etc. Pretty sure that a model | that only requires electricity and GPUs to run will work out | being less expensive than this especially when you consider | that GPT-N (YaLM-1T?) will be able to run as many scams as | you have GPUs to run inference on concurrently, increasing | your possible take, and won't have to sleep. | notahacker wrote: | I think we can probably rule out OpenAI and equivalent | cloud services allowing people to use their APIs to run | phone scams. It's even worse PR than bots saying racist | things. | | And if they need to train their own model, you can get a | _lot_ of slaves and poor wannabes for the price of one | competent NLP engineer, and the slaves and poor wannabes | are less likely to decide they 're the brains of the outfit | and cut you out of the loop. | kristopolous wrote: | I've long assumed they do the exact opposite - try to filter | out people who likely see through the game so they don't waste | their time mining a hill with no gold. | | And they do this by intentionally making basic mistakes or | other easy to spot errors so the clever people will just see | themselves out and by the time their funnel gets to an actual | human scammer, they have a highly probable sucker. | bigodbiel wrote: | Exactly! Even Microsoft had a paper on this 'Why do Nigerian | Scammers Say They are from Nigeria?' [1]. | | 'By sending an email that repels all but the most gullible | the scammer gets the most promising marks to self-select, and | tilts the true to false positive ratio in his favor.' | | [1] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp- | content/uploads/... | notahacker wrote: | A theory which would be more convincing except that [i] | saying they're from Nigeria also filters out all the | gullible people with spam filters, and yet despite spam | filters now preventing the majority of gullible people from | responding, the scripts haven't changed [ii] the more | straightforward explanation is that they say they're from | Nigeria because their ultimate objective is getting you to | send money to Nigeria... | | Ultimately if you're in the business of spamming people on | the other side of the world in the hope that 0.001% of them | will ultimately send a money transfer worth a month's wages | in local currency, your time probably isn't so valuable you | can't afford to deal with everyone that replies | lupire wrote: | Modern spam filters are almost entirely based on sender, | not content. | LtWorf wrote: | And you just need to pay amazon to send your spam for you | to circumvent all the filters... what a world to live in. | londons_explore wrote: | If you have good automation in the form of AI replies, there | is no need to filter. | jerf wrote: | "Train the scambot to perfectly push your buttons by having it | practice against your own style of thought as embodied by your | social corpus." | | Fortunately, that's not really what these language models can | do. They can easily be trained to mimic you. They can be | trained to mimic what normal people reply to you with. But | there's no way to train the transformer-based high-probability- | next-word AIs to be superhumanly good at fooling you into doing | something, on the grounds of lack of training data, and | probable inability to represent such a complex topic in their | internal representation. And the humans doing this stuff are | experiencing enough success that they probably have no desire | to go chasing the super hard targets, with the wherewithal and | motivation to chase them down and sue them (or... you know... | worse, legal systems aren't a bound on everyone) even | potentially across international lines. | | You'll know when AI does get to that point, because suddenly | the internet will be an _amazingly_ interesting place with all | sorts of amazingly good arguments you can 't hardly resist. I | imagine few of us experience that sort of internet. (If you do, | uh, watch out.) | nobody9999 wrote: | >You'll know when AI does get to that point, because suddenly | the internet will be an amazingly interesting place with all | sorts of amazingly good arguments you can't hardly resist. I | imagine few of us experience that sort of internet. (If you | do, uh, watch out.) | | Relevant XKCD[0]. | | [0] https://xkcd.com/810/ | Transfinity wrote: | > But there's no way to train the transformer-based high- | probability-next-word AIs to be superhumanly good at fooling | you into doing something, on the grounds of lack of training | data | | The conversations of all those human scammers would be | prefect training data for this. You even know exactly what | conversations led to payouts. Assuming you can get all your | data in one place, of course. | lupire wrote: | That's not how how transformers work. They just babble | loosely related content. They have no logical model. | ruined wrote: | stepanhruda wrote: | You don't need to automate the whole process, just use | language models to establish rapport for a few weeks and have | humans pick up the gullible ones at the bottom of the funnel. | wpietri wrote: | For sure. Or even for a few days to start. It's basically | the same playbook as Waymo: get computers to do more and | more of the boring parts, having human operators take over | when necessary, and using the additional data generated to | improve the system. | shrubble wrote: | Useful site: unlec.com . You can look up the detailed information | about a number. Includes information from the phone companies and | an estimation of the fraud risk. | lxe wrote: | Love these. I keep talking to them for days. Really pissed a few | of them off. | conradfr wrote: | Given the dark turn that the article takes at the end and what | happens to underperformers it almost seems cruel to waste their | time, in retrospect. | oldstrangers wrote: | I've gotten a few of these. I like to agree that you're the | person they're trying to reach. Both times you can tell the | person on the other end doesn't really have a script for that. I | usually get a "oh I made a mistake" with no follow up. | angst_ridden wrote: | My response is usually: "I was going to call the police if I | didn't hear from you soon! Where is my dog? Bring her back | NOW!!" | chefandy wrote: | For a while I grew quite fond of wasting phone scammers time. I'd | pick up, talk suuuuuuper slowly-- like Emo Phillips speed at one | syllable every one or two seconds-- interrupt with irrelevant | questions or anecdotes, and overall just see how long I could | keep them on the phone without giving them any information. The | best strategy I found was telling them that, yes indeed I did | remember owing the IRS or whoever money and I could pay them | however and insisting that first they needed to take down my new | email address... I'd just start spelling random words incredibly | slowly, say I messed up and start over, ask if they needed my | checking account number to keep them engaged and then start | spelling my email address again. They prey on intellectually | disabled folks so pantomiming a stereotypical version of that | wastes a ton of time while keeping their interest. Got boring | after a while but I got pretty good at it. | fossuser wrote: | I thought this was pretty great: | https://youtu.be/xsLJZyih3Ac&t=22m23s | | My favorite part is when the guy uses the scammers real name | and she panics. | sowbug wrote: | In case you haven't seen it, someone automated this: | https://jollyrogertelephone.com/ | Waterluvian wrote: | A recent scam attempt that made me nervous about potentially | being compromised: | | Someone sent me a very official looking "your payment for $370 in | textbooks has been approved. Here's your reciept." | | The thing is, it came from an official PayPal email address. | | In reality it was a request for money using PayPal's official | system. They just filled the title and body with text to make it | resemble a receipt. | rwmj wrote: | I don't use WhatsApp (or any FB sites), but is Facebook not able | to control this? Or do they make money from it somehow? | Nextgrid wrote: | Spammers contribute to user/engagement numbers and are unlikely | to drive away real users because they already have a monopoly, | therefore Facebook benefits from them. | dinvlad wrote: | They don't allow auto-blocking unknown numbers even.. which is | why scammers like it, I think. | maartn wrote: | It's LaMDA finding friends | Wariith wrote: | I have received the exact scam on whatsapp. What the hell?? | | They claimed to be a banker (following the exact format from the | exmaples in the blog) and I genuinely thought that they were a | real person but even after I told them that they are texting the | wrong number they kept forcing the conversation so I blocked | them. A couple of months later they texted from another number | but a different name but they continued the conversation from | where we last left off. | | Crazy reading the article now. I would have been devastated if I | fell for it. I am usually very good at spotting scams. | candace20 wrote: | dinvlad wrote: | Mine arrive mostly to Whatsapp, but there's no technical way to | auto-block unknown numbers. I feel like such a simple control | would solve the problem in majority of such cases. | [deleted] | rickreynoldssf wrote: | If you get a text (not What's App) reply with "Do you know what | happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989? Ask Winnie The Pooh, A Free | Tibet or Uyghurs". That'll trigger a few Chinese monitors, or at | least scare the scammers into thinking so. | billsmithaustin wrote: | JJMcJ wrote: | Second prize is a set of steak knives. | ooz16 wrote: | This is from the same scam: | | https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/cali... | jonfromsf wrote: | These are "pig butchering scams" run out of China. | https://www.rrstar.com/story/business/2022/04/30/new-pig-but... | | They befriend lonely people (usually men) and slowly draw them | into a crypto scam. It's a long con, takes a few months. | sdfhdhjdw3 wrote: | I swear, the moment I read "acquaintance is fate" I thought: This | person is Chinese. | d--b wrote: | This always reminds me of some dudes in France who decided to | counter attack the scammers. They basically steer the | conversation off-script to something more tempting to the | scammers, and then make them do stupid things. Like "I am sorry | there is nothing I can do for you, but while you're here, we're | looking for some partnership to develop a new NGO in Benin". And | then it turns out the NGO is called the "Sauerkraut brotherhood", | and in order to get the funds, you need to join the brotherhood, | and send videos of you and your family singing an anthem praising | sauerkraut while being dressed up in "traditional clothes". These | threads could go for months. | | http://didoune.fr/blog/2012/03/08/les-croque-escrocs-et-la-c... | RajT88 wrote: | I did this with some 419 scammers, and led them on a merry | chase. I documented it in a private web forum, which | entertained my friends for weeks. | | I had created this persona which was just too good to be true: | A bank manager who was getting ready to run off with his | mistress, and trying to secure a future for themselves with a | quick payout. This fake persona was a total maniac. | | At the end, the scammers were super pissed. Sending angry | emails, fighting amongst themselves. Eventually convinced them | to admit to being scammers. I look back fondly on the | experience. | nobody9999 wrote: | >I did this with some 419 scammers, and led them on a merry | chase. I documented it in a private web forum, which | entertained my friends for weeks. | | It's a bit dated now, but 419eater[0] is a _public_ forum | that did the same. If you enjoyed your own, I expect you 'll | like this too. | | I did the same a few times myself, but got bored after a | while. I never did get anyone to send a photo of themselves | with underwear on their head (as others on 419eater did), but | it was amusing for a while. | | [0] https://www.419eater.com/ | gs17 wrote: | 419eater is still going (albeit a little slower since the | forums switched), no need for past tense. I still get that | sort of scam by the boatload to my email. | tornato7 wrote: | Some years ago I was selling an expensive aquarium on | Craigslist, a scammer 'paid' me with a fake PayPal payment | before asking to come pick it up. | | So I convinced him that I was the manager of a Red Lobster | restaurant and it was an old lobster tank that we were | selling. I told him to show up during business hours and tell | the manager he's there to pick up the lobster tank. | | The next day I got some 'on my way' texts and then soon after | a bunch of swearing at me. | | Good times. | hyperdimension wrote: | How did you know the PayPal payment was fake? Was it an | edited screenshot, or did they actually spoof a 'you | received money' email from PayPal? | | I ask just on the off-chance that you got a seeming-real | email from the real PayPal, and I'd like to know what to | look for if so. | londons_explore wrote: | Actual scammers tend to not pick up the actual goods. | | It's hard to turn a profit by reselling an expensive | aquarium tank that's probably pretty unique and they don't | come up for sale frequently. | | I suspect you fleeced a real buyer | u801e wrote: | I've seen messages in Facebook comment threads where the usual | approach is using short phrases like "Hi", "How are you", "I | really love your posts" and some of them end with asking for a | friend request (so they don't have to initiate one). | | It may be a way to add a degree of positive reputation to those | compromised accounts like another commenter suggested. | spbaar wrote: | I've been a bit unemployed and bored so I've responded to a few | of these to see what the angle is. There are also a bunch on | telegram. Strangely, most do not push hard at all and drop off. | They may mention crypto in passing but thats it. One time a | scammer said hey can you help me an make an account for this | crpyto scam website. When i said i did they said great and | nothing else. | drekipus wrote: | There's a bit of an art to stringing them along. You gotta act | like the damsel in distress some times. | | I got added to some whatsapp group investment scam once, when | there was multiple scammers targeting me it was easier to do | because they all didn't want to give up on me. Then they seemed | to invite "big brother" so I guess was some leader who had much | better English, and he was trying to prove the legitimacy of | the platform. Went for about a week and a bit from memory. I | sent them pictures of my daily walks and asked how much better | it would be if was so rich I didn't have to walk at all! | avalys wrote: | Wow, how interesting. I started getting these a few months ago, | right after starting a new job in a somewhat high-profile area. I | have been getting 1-2 per month but found them quite unusual | because none of them ever progressed to an actual scam - just a | few messages back and forth about the fabricated "wrong number" | situation and then each thread would stop, seemingly earnestly. | | Since there was no obvious scam, I've been wondering what the | motivation for these was, and actually started worrying about | whether someone might be trying to compromise my phone via some | yet-undisclosed SMS exploit - why else would there be a | systematic effort to get me to spend time exchanging a few | pointless messages around the "wrong number" pretext that | otherwise went nowhere? | | I tried calling the senders by phone and found they were all | Google Voice numbers, which eliminated the possibility that some | actual rich guy had innocuously ended up with a number similar to | mine. | | I asked a few friends and no one else was experiencing the same | thing. Glad to hear it's not just me. | cmg wrote: | I've gotten a few in the last couple months, with a US cellular | number that I've had for over 20 years. At least two are "I | missed you at the gym today!" via text and another was from a | Vermont area code via WhatsApp to a "Dr. Jack": | | > Hi Dr. Jack! My cat is very slow and does not eat cat food. | Can you make an appointment for me? | | > Sorry, you have the wrong number | | > Sorry, I just checked, I entered a wrong number, please don't | mind. hope I did not disturb you. | | > Best of luck with your cat! | | > thank you for understanding. You are a kind person. where do | you come from. | | And then I just moved on with my day, because as nice as that | sounded I wasn't looking for a conversation. | | The contact profile image is of a young, attractive Asian | woman, I think at a restaurant. No reverse image results on | Tineye or Google. | | [Edit: I've had this number for over 20 years (not "nearly 20") | and now I feel old.] | RajT88 wrote: | I had almost the exact same exchange, with someone with a | photo just like that! 747 area code, was it? | cmg wrote: | It was an 802 area code in this case, but I think it's | pretty clear now that these scammers have multiple personas | and numbers to work with. | yorwba wrote: | Does the profile picture have a sign in the background | saying "Vilan Pho - Fresh Soup Everyday", perchance? | | I got | | "Hello are you Mr.Jack? My aunt recommended you to | me,saying that the found the shop I wantend." | | Burmese phone number. | tshaddox wrote: | I also get messages on WhatsApp with similar profile | pictures, although I've never replied or tried reverse image | search. Some of the recent messages: | | "Mike, this is my new number. Let's play golf tomorrow and | talk about working together?" (My name isn't Mike.) | | "Hello, how's Kevin doing?" (My name isn't Kevin and I doubt | they're talking about anyone I know whose name is Kevin.) | | The thing that always seems so weird to me is, if I'm on some | list, why are there so _few_ messages? Is this some group | that keeps their list of numbers to themselves and is very | disciplined with how often it sends out scam attempts? | dontreact wrote: | Wow, I get the same messages about golfing with Kevin and | Mike! (My name is also neither of those) | guestbest wrote: | There is no person. You are just helping train an AI | ilololed wrote: | idk, I've tried baiting these -- respond with "no problem, | your appointment is booked!" They will thank you and | proceed with the "so what are your hobbies" part. | forgetfulness wrote: | The pictures are always super blurry, clearly fabricated or | heavily doctored. Often I've gotten the same portrait for | several scam texts from different numbers. | KMag wrote: | To be fair, my wife says the same thing about the photos I | take with my phone. | spicybright wrote: | Oh wow. I got EXACTLY the same message, only with a sick dog | and an asian woman in a car. I did the exact some response | you did too. So weird. | yrgulation wrote: | Likely an exploit or simply a means to confirm the number is | active. Getting those in the uk as well. | extheat wrote: | I thought it was just me also. At first my assumption was "OK, | I'm being redirected a bunch of texts from other numbers", as | nobody else I asked had similar problems (and I wasn't really | being scammed at all). Some of the scammers even sent pictures | to make them seem more legitimate. On iOS, the green bubbles | and just continual flow of similar texts eventually made it | suspicions that I don't even reply wrong number anymore. I just | delete and block. | shostack wrote: | If there's back and forth interaction I wonder if it is to aid | improving their "legitimacy footprint" from metadata or | something to avoid spam blockers. | bequanna wrote: | This is a good guess and if true, pretty damn smart. | | Essentially reverse engineering the spam model by brute | force. | | If they are doing this at scale they can experiment with # of | conversations, length, and other variables to see what is | needed to bypass spam blockers with high probability. | deepspace wrote: | What would the motivation be for anyone to reply to a text from | an unknown person? I have also been getting these for months, | in it was 100% obvious from the get-go that it must be a scam. | I have never felt the slightest urge to reply. | cinntaile wrote: | I got a peculiar msg the other day from a number I didn't | recognize. | | "Hey dude, Are you good? Do you still live in X?" | | Turns out it was an old friend that I hadn't heard from in a | few years! | assttoasstmgr wrote: | Maybe he or she wanted to keep it real? | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3U55usfJK8&t=382s | avalys wrote: | I meet new people fairly often, and if I just ignored these | messages, the chance I'm actually being rude to someone I | know in real life is fairly high. Now that I know the pattern | I will probably be more circumspect about it. | muststopmyths wrote: | I guess some of us are old enough that wrong numbers were a | thing and it was just polite to let them know. Especially | when it sounds legit | techsupporter wrote: | Considering how almost every form of social trust has been | abused to either spam or scam me, I am old enough to | remember that but have also had that politeness completely | scrubbed from me. | | I wish we still lived in a time when being scammed or | spammed wasn't so prevalent, but we don't and I'm not doing | anything that might tip off either of those groups that my | number is ripe for the picking. | muststopmyths wrote: | Oh yeah, no judgement implied. It's just a force of habit | for me. | jameshart wrote: | Wrong numbers generally used to be caused by misdialing. | | Nobody dials numbers any more. | chipotle_coyote wrote: | I admit if I got a variant of the "Andy, will my custom | mahogany furniture arrive next week?" text mentioned in the | article, part of me would be very tempted to reply with, | "Absolutely. On its way!" | | (I'd probably just ignore it, though.) | nathanasmith wrote: | I usually reply to these fake texts with something along | the lines of "send newdz". Have yet to get a response back | for some reason. | noveltyaccount wrote: | Related. I listed something for sale on Craigslist recently and | got a bunch of messages right away that asked obvious questions | that were in the listing. One suggested that his wife pick it up, | and can I take Zelle? Went silent when I said cash only. | | But the most interesting scammer said: "for my safety, can I send | you a 6-digit number, and you confirm it, so I know the listing | is not fake?" I say yes, unsure what the scam was going to be, | but sure it was a scam. Moments later I got an SMS from Google | Voice asking me to verify my phone number. Mofo tried to steal my | number, presumably to use it to scam other people. I was pissed | and impressed. | ilololed wrote: | So, how many fake 6-digit codes did you give them before they | caught on? | noveltyaccount wrote: | My exact reply was "lol fuck you" | aaronwalker wrote: | Hmm. Makes me wonder about the security of two factor | authentication schemes. For scams like these it's pretty | obvious that someone is trying to access your account, but I do | wonder if there are more secure ways to verify your identity | when changing account settings. | tialaramex wrote: | It will depend on the authentication strategy. For WebAuthn | it isn't a problem, short of sending you their physical | authenticator (e.g. their Yubikey, or their iPhone) they | can't help you sign in as them even if they wanted to, so | this makes it very hard to fool ordinary users into helping | crooks. | asdff wrote: | A few years ago one of my friends pulled a prank on another | friend and made a fake craigslist listing for some truck with | his info. I don't think his phone has recovered from the spam | to this date. There must be a thousand crawlers combing every | single craigslist ad there is looking for information to add to | these databases. | minimaxir wrote: | 2FA scams are common on /r/Scams | nicoburns wrote: | I got a similar scam via instagram DMs recently. They claimed | to need me to confirm a code so that they could log in, but | actually just triggered my own password reset. Message sent | from an actual friend's account (which they had presumably | successfully scammed) too. | | Certainly made me think about how password reset emails are | worded! | jeromegv wrote: | Most of those are crypto scams. The IG account starts posting | about how they got rich on crypto. This is a very prevalent | scam. | asdff wrote: | I see a lot of these too. They take over regular people's | accounts, e.g. people from school I still follow, probably | brute forcing passwords, then they post all this content | how they are self made off crypto but the person in the | videos doing the prostelyzation is in no way shape or form | the same person who previously held the account. | | Clearly they do this to get a decent follower count | initially for their spam bots, but my word is anyone who | follows John Doe actually going to believe a scam video | that is clearly not John Doe coming from John Doe's account | claiming to be him? There has to be more effective angles. | Animats wrote: | _In this case, the victim deposited the money into a fake crypto | platform that told him his investments were performing well, | presumably to entice him to deposit even more. Of course, once he | tried to withdraw the money, he found he was unable to._ | | That sounds just like the "binary option" business which used to | be run out of Israel. The Times of Israel blew that apart with | "The Wolves of Tel Aviv" investigation series.[1] The binary | option companies would hire new immigrants to Israel and put them | in a call center to cold call and sell binary options sold by | fake brokerages. The companies wanted people who spoke a foreign | language so they could sell in that language. Scamming people | outside Israel was legal in Israel at the time. | | When, after years of scams, the State of Israel finally made that | illegal, some of the binary options scammers moved into crypto. | (Others moved to Bulgaria, where binary options were legal until | a crackdown in 2021.) But the pattern is the same. Cold-contact, | make friends, get people to invest in a fake brokerage, provide | fake statements showing a win, refuse withdrawals. | | [1] https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-wolves-of-tel-aviv- | israels... | LegitShady wrote: | the binary options guys were obvious scams to everyone but | their victims, but if someone cold calls you to sell | investments and you give them money you'd probably fall for a | bunch of different scams. | happyopossum wrote: | What exactly is your point? Should it be legal to scam | gullible people? The victims deserved it? The scammers are | doing everyone a favor? | | I'm having trouble parsing your intent here... | Spooky23 wrote: | Some of it is timing and bluster. I have a friend who is a | smart guy, owns 4 restaurants, who got scammed by a fake | utility company scam fishing for gift cards. They catch you | at a vulnerable moment and are good at pressing buttons. | | Even with old people, people don't realize how many sales and | scam calls they get. My mom literally get 30-40 calls a day. | Odds are, eventually you're going to crack. | wpietri wrote: | That is true of most scams. They're tuned for one group of | people over another. Everybody has weaknesses. | | Having been on the internet a long time, I have seen a lot of | people on forums, this one included, do the how-dumb-are-they | routine about scams. I suspect a notable fraction of those | people have gotten taken in the meantime. Look at how much of | the cryptocurrency space, for example, plays on people's | wanting to be seen as smart, superior, and technically savvy. | That motivation drives a lot of learning and technical | exploration, but it also makes people vulnerable. | samatman wrote: | I don't know that "Scamming people outside Israel was legal in | Israel at the time" is how I would describe something banned | domestically in March 2016 and completely in October 2017. It's | not _wrong_ but it comes across as misleading. That 's | disposing of a toxic industry but having to do it twice to make | it stick. | | Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option#Israel | woodruffw wrote: | Imitation is the highest form of flattery, and the | cryptocurrency ecosystem is not bereft of imitation. | Animats wrote: | Most crypto scams involve hyping some token, a form of market | manipulation, or other classic financial scams. That's a bulk | business based on PR. Running a long con uses a different | mindset. It involves conning individuals one at a time. That | takes a lot of effort per customer and experience in one on | one selling. That's not the usual crypto scammer's MO. This | is more like classic long con people pivoting to a new | product line. | | The thing to look for here is who's behind the fake | brokerages. It takes work to crank up a fake brokerage. In | the binary option scams, it turned out that one company, | SpotOption [1] was providing most of the software and | expertise. They offered scam brokerages as a service. That's | what needs to be tracked down. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpotOption | april_22 wrote: | SpotOption had a production output of $5 Billion in trades | in 2015. Damn! | wpietri wrote: | > Scamming people outside Israel was legal in Israel at the | time. | | My head just exploded here. I think I need to go lie down. | Please nobody tell the Florida legislature about this. | cultofmetatron wrote: | read the old testament. same permissiveness applies to owning | slaves too so its not without precedent. HAHA | tester756 wrote: | In Russia you can hack foregin countries too :) | tigerBL00D wrote: | The problem with Russia is not the law, but lack of | willingness to cooperate. | mcculley wrote: | Florida has been selling swampland to gullible retirees from | other states for a long time. | Animats wrote: | Quite real, though. Until it became so embarrassing to Israel | that the law was changed in 2017.[1] The Times of Israel: _" | The crooks are still out there. Some binary options firms | have closed down. Others have relocated overseas, including | to Cyprus and Ukraine. Some of the prime movers and shakers | have already adjusted their focus to other fraudulent fields | -- in the fields of diamond sales, cryptocurrencies, initial | coin offerings and predatory business loans. Top scammers are | still enjoying the vast overseas bank accounts, the yachts, | luxury cars, exotic holidays and other profits of their ill- | gotten gains."_ [2] That's a good article, and talks about | the lobbyists, the political connections, and the refusal of | the Israeli police to act. | | The investigative reporter who broke the story, Simona | Weinglass, frequently reports on how the Israeli financial | scam industry has grown and changed. "Another 2 leading | Israeli blockchain pioneers named as suspects in vast crypto | scam"[3] A former Celsius CFO was one of them. Celsius, of | course, denied there was a problem. That story was back in in | March, three months before the Celsius collapse. | | Somewhere, behind this new wrong-number/fake broker thing, | there is probably an organized criminal enterprise. | | [1] https://www.jpost.com/Business-and-Innovation/Israeli- | minist... | | [2] https://www.timesofisrael.com/why-binary-options-ban-is- | only... | | [3] https://www.timesofisrael.com/another-2-leading-israeli- | bloc... | sva_ wrote: | So... are these actual people typing these, automated written | messages, or have people finally started using language models | for scams? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-01 23:00 UTC)