[HN Gopher] How the Higgs Boson Ruined Peter Higgs's Life ___________________________________________________________________ How the Higgs Boson Ruined Peter Higgs's Life Author : pseudolus Score : 77 points Date : 2022-07-01 10:31 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.scientificamerican.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.scientificamerican.com) | tchvil wrote: | In my street, it is Francois Englert (or Robert Brout having the | intuition) who found it first. Because his daughter was living in | front of my house. And I'm still wondering why Higgs won the | name. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | https://wikiless.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy?lang=en | sidkshatriya wrote: | Along the lines of "I won a $100 million dollars and it ruined my | life"... | | Basically one does not value money, fame, beauty, power etc. if | you already have it in plenty. Take it away suddenly and then you | will realise how much you were taking your cachet for granted. | Hbruz0 wrote: | Similarly, take anonymity, non-fame, low responsibilities away | from your life suddenly and you'll realise how much you were | taking it for granted. | spicyusername wrote: | A bit of clickbait. | | The article just says he liked solitude and after being out of | the pubic eye fit _40 years_, the Nobel prize made him a public | figure temporarily. Hardly life ruining. | Angostura wrote: | Hardly click bait - It's a direct reported quote from the man | himself. | | > One of the biggest shocks I had when I was interviewing him | was when he said the discovery of the boson "ruined [his] | life." I thought, "How can it ruin your life when you have done | some beautiful mathematics, and then it turns out you had | mysteriously touched on the pulse of nature, and everything | you've believed in has been shown to be correct, and you've won | a Nobel Prize? How can these things amount to ruin?" He said, | "My relatively peaceful existence was ending. My style is to | work in isolation and occasionally have a bright idea." He is a | very retiring person who was being thrust into the limelight. | imranq wrote: | I guess its called Stokholm syndrome for a reason :) | klabb3 wrote: | Yes, it refers to the hostage crisis of employees during a bank | robbery in Stockholm in the 1970s. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norrmalmstorg_robbery | UIUC_06 wrote: | Eventually (100+ years) he'll be the answer to a trivia question. | | I think a lot of people like modesty in a famous person. It's so | different from the posers who _want_ to be famous and go slapping | their names on everything. | | I would hope that someone like him would give some speeches, the | audience would love him, and he'd get a warm glow for the rest of | his life that "I did that!" | mhh__ wrote: | Considering Higgs barely published anything for decades after | ruination might not be so bad. | | That Nobel was a real shame in that the mechanism was discovered | independently by multiple groups, but the prize only allows 3. | Kibble had a real claim to it but probably missed out because it | would've meant not rewarding his colleagues. | temp1828472 wrote: | The mechanism was discovered by Anderson. They had to give it | to Higgs because otherwise people might realize that | theoretical particle physicists don't do anything real (sorry | but not sorry) | JPLeRouzic wrote: | This person? | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_W._Anderson | | " _From 1949 to 1984, Anderson was employed by Bell | Laboratories in New Jersey, where he worked on a wide variety | of problems in condensed matter physics. | | During this period he developed: | | - what is now called Anderson localization (the idea that | extended states can be localized by the presence of disorder | in a system) | | - Anderson's theorem (concerning impurity scattering in | superconductors); | | - invented the Anderson Hamiltonian, which describes the | site-wise interaction of electrons in a transition metal; | proposed symmetry breaking within particle physics (this | played a role in the development of the Standard Model and | the development of the theory behind the Higgs mechanism, | which in turn generates mass in some elementary particles); | | - created the pseudospin approach to the BCS theory of | superconductivity; | | - made seminal studies of non-s-wave pairing (both symmetry- | breaking and microscopic mechanism) in the superfluidity of | He3, | | - and helped found the area of spin-glasses._" | Maursault wrote: | > Considering Higgs barely published anything for decades after | ruination might not be so bad. | | I'd have never suspected that fame might be a correction to | slow progress or discovery. I believe that, in general, fame is | a solved problem, but the solution is not available to | everyone. Why or how could a professor have an apparatus and | plan and staff in place to deal with the challenges of fame? | But I think it is a crying shame that just the detail of | extreme popularity ruins the work. Even if Professor Higgs had | already produced most of his work, as a species and society, | everyone and everyone that comes after is hurt by denying him | the ability to work and produce, and others before and after | him. When will Beatlemania end? Why don't we, collectively, | have restraint, have the ability? You'd think as a species by | now we would have evolved some kind of completely invisible and | odorless biochemical pheromonal response that tells all other | humans, "leave me alone, I'm busy." Instead, it takes a staff. | potiuper wrote: | If its really an issue, then Higgs could ask for it be called | some thing more descriptive such as the integral (spin) mass | field/particle/mechanism. | rob_c wrote: | Please Americans so writing nonsense. He is retired, he gets the | option to travel the world and speak since the Nobel (key point | here if he chooses) and before then he was involved in own events | by choice. He's donated a huge amount to charities which is a | good thing, from what I understand there are few if any | stipulations on the prize itself. | | Yes science bods keep annoying the retired old man, but most of | us would let him browse a bookshop in peace. The physics dept | handles the stuff dropped off for him and yes that wildly varies | from the scribblings of new age nutters (I'm not joking, people | think writing symbols from stones makes science) to people | wanting to get a step ahead in the field, but none of that ends | up at his door these days. | kupopuffs wrote: | Even he says it ruined his life. Am I misunderstanding your | comment? | rob_c wrote: | He doesn't go to bed ruing the day as typically reported, but | yes he dislikes that the other things he worked on within his | professional career get overlooked by the small 1 page paper | joining the dots on symmetry breaking. | | This reflection, albeit a candid one. Gets blown out of | proportion media people (as with the article) are more | obsessed with the 50 years of research and work that went | into finding the damn thing to see if it actually existed. I | don't think he tends to speak to crowds too much at his age, | but his last few talks made it clear he has wider interests | than the boson so when you ask him about it he wants to | change the topic. | | Frankly the worst I can think of was some idiotic | "scientific" press from the continent thought it was a great | idea to doorstep him and his family shortly after everything | died down, but now the press is over it he goes about it life | mostly unchanged. A year or 2 of disruption for effectively a | lottery sized winning isnt running someone's life. | lokimedes wrote: | After we discovered the particle in June 2012, there was a large | summer conference in Stockholm (a good few months before the | Nobel announcement). In the spirit of jubilation the Municipality | had arranged a classical "Nobel" reception at the Mayor's Hall | and banquet at the Vasa Museum in the evening. | | As a good friend of the chair of the organizing committee, I was | asked to help that evening, collecting invitations as people | entered. After greeting the first 100 or so, up came this elderly | man who has lost his invitation. He was very sorry, and asked if | there was any way for him to prove he in fact was invited. I told | the gentleman, that he could have mine in case there was any | trouble. As Peter Higgs was allowed to enter the little dress | rehearsal for what was to befall him in autumn, there was a warm | chuckle around us. | | I have met him on other occasions and perhaps it is exactly his | non-selfish personality that has allowed the particle to carry | his name in the first place. The rest of particle physics is | luckily void of attributing eternal properties of nature to | individuals. | Qem wrote: | >The rest of particle physics is luckily void of attributing | eternal properties of nature to individuals. | | Physicists are blessed! Some fields are polluted with proper | name derived jargon. Then learning anything is comparable to | learn the phone book by rote. It sucks! | agys wrote: | But what about the units...? | arthurcolle wrote: | You recognized him, right? It was a little ambiguous from the | prose | | Edit: You say "we discovered" so presumably obviously yes you | had to lol | lokimedes wrote: | I did indeed :) it as his presumption that I didn't know who | he was that made me connect with the OP's article. | lalalandland wrote: | FWIW Bosons are named after a person | arthurcolle wrote: | I wonder how bose-einstein condensates would taste. Forbidden | ice cream? | frutiger wrote: | And of course fermions. | frutiger wrote: | And while Gell-Mann did not name them after himself, "three | quarks for Muster Mark" is a delightful origin of that | particle's name. | wrycoder wrote: | We started with up and down quarks, and then discovered the | charmed and strange ones. It would have been appropriate, | given the trend in quark naming, to call the next two gell | and mann, but Feynman would have had a fit. | Sharlin wrote: | As are fermions, but not hadrons ("stout"), baryons | ("heavy"), mesons ("intermediate"), or leptons ("thin", | "fine"). | lokimedes wrote: | You got me. But being a Fermion or a Boson is (IMO) a label | for a generic property. and we have plenty of other such | theoretical constructs named after the inventor: Weyl, Dirac, | etc. we need language and labels to communicate ideas, so | that is alight. But the Higgs particle and mechanism | represents physical reality (now at least) which brings it to | the level of electrons, quarks and the fundamental forces of | nature. These names will stand for as long as our | civilization. Who cares that someone predicted them a couple | of years before their discovery when we are a century down | the line. Just imagine if fire was known as the Peterson | effect? Anyway that's just my opinion. | mike_hock wrote: | I question both the point and the well-definedness of this | distinction between the concrete and the abstract. Does the | Lorentz factor not "represent physical reality" and will it | not also stand until the end of civilization? | | Why should a particle (almost) never be allowed to bear the | name of its inventor, but an equation or a constant should? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-02 23:00 UTC)