[HN Gopher] Mendon, Missouri ___________________________________________________________________ Mendon, Missouri Author : h2odragon Score : 396 points Date : 2022-07-04 14:03 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (seandietrich.com) (TXT) w3m dump (seandietrich.com) | hansword wrote: | Is a good story, but I am not sure what use it has for | YChackernews....? | | Also want to second @mcphage | buchoo wrote: | Reminds me of the American TV show "What Would You Do?", of which | there are many videos on YouTube: | https://www.youtube.com/c/WhatWouldYouDo | | It tends heavily to revisit certain themes, but overall it drives | home the point that regardless of the social acrimony and | political polarization that dominate social media and seem to | divide Americans into inexorably inimical tribes, when it comes | to everyday interactions, most Americans seem to be pretty decent | and kind people. | davidro80 wrote: | Stories like this are extremely motivating to me after seeing | non-stop streams of pure social negativity or bad events | unfolding in the news. | | Unrelated, but it did make me think of 9/11 and "The Man in the | Red Bandana": | | https://youtu.be/S77KYbkmjwc | | The opening question sets the stage for the context: | | "What would you do, in the last hour of your life?" | | I love humans even with all of our negatives. Everyone has the | potential to "rise to the occasion" in their own way big or | small. | | Happy 4th of July to my US HN friends! | [deleted] | ketanmaheshwari wrote: | Tangent but I have observed in the US that often the red lights | at the train crossing start very late and give less than a minute | for a vehicle to stop. | mycpuorg wrote: | <3 | chronotis wrote: | It may not have made national news, but here (I only live a | couple hours from Mendon) some of this made its way into local | awareness. It was mostly focused on the efforts of the boy scouts | in the area, though. | tigeba wrote: | The Scouts who responded to this incident were passengers on | the train that derailed. They were returning from Philmont | Scout Ranch in New Mexico. It is traditional for Scouts to take | the trip to and from Philmont on a train. | jxcole wrote: | kweingar wrote: | I see your point, but helping people at the scene of an | accident is not incompatible with bad views on social issues. | | Almost all of the heroes of the Titanic, or the Allied soldiers | in WWII, would share all of these views. Many of the first | responders at 9/11 shared most or all of these views. | | Not endorsing or excusing these views, just pointing out that | the idea that this is hypocritical is very new | Miner49er wrote: | You know the political views of everyone in Mendon, MO? You | live there or something? | bsuvc wrote: | So you read a story of people helping people and all you can | think of is "how do I make this reflect poorly on my political | enemies"? | mlyle wrote: | The story is a commentary on how wonderful the people living | in small towns are. | | And, well, I disagree with the premise--- because it seems to | deny that most people are wonderful everywhere, not just in | small towns. Most people are also capable of terrible things | in groups, too. | | A whole lot of people have had to flee small towns to avoid | the kind of disgrace and judgment that only a really small | community can give. And, yes, small town America is, for the | most part, politically regressive. | xbar wrote: | >The story is a commentary on how wonderful the people | living in small towns are. | | I don't think so, but I see how you got there. | | I think it is a story about empathy for others in a crisis, | and the author argues that this is universal in America-- | including New York, Chicago, Mobile, Detroit, Los Angeles, | Atlanta, Boston, Houston, Seattle, Indianapolis, Honolulu, | and Charlotte. | mlyle wrote: | This was the sentence that convinced me it's talking | about something being special about small towns: And the | most unusual thing about all this is: None of this is | unusual. At least not within the national tapestry that | is The Great American Small Town. | | The author blogs pretty much exclusively on the cultural | tapestry of the South. | | > and the author argues that this is universal in | America- | | I see a comment arguing that, but not by the author. | jessaustin wrote: | _...the cultural tapestry of the South._ | | This is sort of a "stolen valor" situation, because | Mendon MO is certainly _not_ the South. One could make | that argument for parts of Missouri, but this ain 't the | Ozarks. Mendon is on the same latitude as Dayton OH, so | only JD Vance types would pretend to be confused about | this. | krapp wrote: | Any state that was a slave state and member of the | Confederacy is part of the South. | jessaustin wrote: | _Any state that was a slave state and member of the | Confederacy is part of the South._ | | Missouri was never a member of the Confederacy. Slavery | was in force before the Civil War, but do you really | propose a rule that would also see _Delaware_ considered | part of the South? It 's dumb to use state lines anyway. | For example, Branson MO has a lot stronger claim to be | part of the South than Sedalia MO, a town of which some | people have actually ever heard, is _60 miles_ south of | Mendon. Try visiting some of these places before | pronouncing on them! | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_states_(American_Civ | il_... | stonogo wrote: | Missouri never joined it, but it was admitted to the | Confederacy in 1861. It and Kentucky share this "admitted | but never joined" status -- had the war gone the other | way, the Missourian government-in-exile would have been | legitimized (and in fact, the elected Governor of | Missouri was pro-Confederate; the only reason there was a | Union-sympathizing Governor was because a Union general | chased all the rebels out of the capital). | | "Missouri was never a member of the Confederacy" is a | technicality rather than an honest assessment of | sympathies and prevailing politics in the state. | krapp wrote: | I'd be willing to admit Delaware on a technicality. To me | "the South" doesn't refer to geography so much as the | common referent of slavery in American culture. Maybe | states like Deleware can be called "South adjacent." | jessaustin wrote: | The idea of defining the South in this way is appealing, | not least because it will annoy people who like the "Sean | of the South" website. If we do this, however, we won't | be able to stop at Delaware. [0] Maybe thread parent | could have said, "The author blogs pretty much | exclusively on the cultural tapestry of USA", and I | wouldn't have complained. | | Communication is seldom improved by more vagueness, | however. Sean Dietrich has apparently honed an _oeuvre_ | that makes a certain sort of American feel better about | things, which is explicitly related to a particular | understanding of the South. He doesn 't hesitate to | invoke Maine or Colorado or wherever while layering on | more saccharine banalities, but his audience doesn't love | precision the way HN does. (An example of the fuzziness | of his POV: the fact that the train illustration includes | tall pine trees amid steep slopes rather than the gently | rolling farmland with deciduous forest and scattered | cedars around Mendon.) Presumably this benefits his | project of assuring us that everything is just fine and | we shouldn't think too hard about possible improvements. | I oppose that project, so I think we should continue | excluding him from various locales until he is completely | fenced into a tiny Alabamian postage stamp. So, I don't | agree that Mendon is more Southern than it is Midwestern | or even what Colin Woodard would call "Midlands". | | [0] https://legacyofslavery.harvard.edu/report | bsuvc wrote: | Over twice as many Missourians fought for the Union than | the confederacy. | | > By the end of the war in 1865, nearly 110,000 | Missourians had served in the Union Army and at least | 40,000 in the Confederate Army https://en.m.wikipedia.org | /wiki/Missouri_in_the_American_Civ... | | It is likely that many of today's Missouri residents had | ancestors who fought, and possibly even died, in the | fight to end slavery. | bsuvc wrote: | There are people who read every story they encounter | through a political lens and judge every person based on | how likely they are to be a political ally or enemy | (without even knowing for sure... just stereotyping them). | | It's a form of intellectual dishonesty, where the only | thing that matters is someone's political beliefs and | simply switching the paticipants would yield a different | opinion. | boeingUH60 wrote: | It's similar to religious fundamentalism if you ask me. | mlyle wrote: | OK. | | I grew up in a pseudo-rural, medium sized town. | | There's a lot of good things that I could tell you about | the people -- but I don't think they're qualitatively | that different from people in most cities. | | But I can also tell you that they're regressive, | judgmental places. If someone thinks you screwed up or | did something that is in their eyes wrong, everyone | knows. | | I can't disentangle the assertion that small town culture | is somehow special (and I'm not sure whether the author's | assertion this is true) from the kind of rigid roles | people in this kind of place impose upon one another | (which is inextricably tied to the politics of the place, | too). | | edit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31978527 This | comment explains what I'm trying to say quite well. | forgingahead wrote: | What is striking to me about the discourse amongst American | elites is that they easily otherize their own countrymen, and | swallow hook, line, and sinker any story about the "others" | that help confirm their smug beliefs. If you had 24/7 coverage | in the news about how X group in another country is bad, you | may pause and think this coverage is a little one-sided. But | against your imaginary political enemies, you cackle and laugh | in glee as you pat yourselves on the back for not being them. | | Go outside, travel, and meet real people sharing the wonderful | country you have. You may surprise yourself at just how normal | everyone really is. | BenFranklin100 wrote: | You've put your finger on a fundamental problem in modern | American political discourse. | | Hubris is the deadliest of the seven deadly sins. A | significant but very vocal minority of Americans see politics | as a means to validate their personal self worth rather than | address common problems. | jessaustin wrote: | _If you had 24 /7 coverage in the news about how X group in | another country is bad, you may pause and think this coverage | is a little one-sided._ | | You might want to reconsider the news coverage you may have | seen of Russia, Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Venezuela, Colombia, | Cuba, Bolivia, China, Iran, etc. | bediger4000 wrote: | Just as a counterpoint to this, here's a murder in small town | Missouri, not too far from Mendon: | https://www.google.com/amp/s/fox2now.com/news/true-crime/mis... | | Nobody said anything about it in 40 years. There's a lot more | nuance to small town people pulling together than the train wreck | shows. | | I grew up outside of Kirksville MO. I've even taken the Southwest | Chief from La Plata one or two stops NE of Mendon, to Newton KS. | Idealizing small town or rural life is a mistake. The issue is | more complicated than "rural Americans pull together, urban | Americans do not". | eitland wrote: | > This content is not available in your country/region. | | Seriously. | | What kind of century are those people from? | TazeTSchnitzel wrote: | The century of adtech, which the US doesn't bother to | regulate. | RC_ITR wrote: | This is the same problem with authoritarianism. | | Communities aligned to a single goal can do amazing things, the | downside is just that sometimes that single goal is "protect a | murderer that we all like" or "commit genocide". | soared wrote: | I do not enjoy that every good hearted story needs to have a | top comment with a clickbait counterpoint. | bediger4000 wrote: | Given that I grew up near there, and remembered the Skidmore | murder story, what would you have me do? Not add material to | the discussion? Arm I supposed to just stay silent about some | things? If so, how should I know whether or not to stay | silent. Give me a method, and I'll use it next time. | jessaustin wrote: | How would "sometimes bad things happen" be relevant in the | least? Missouri is a large state and the two communities | aren't close. Besides, you should read the link you posted | rather than relying on memory. That story is of a small | community defending itself from the predations of a | sociopath whom law enforcement could not control. Maybe | it's a critique of law enforcement, but it isn't a | "counterpoint" to "small town people help out in | emergency". | bediger4000 wrote: | How is "sometimes good things happen" relevant in the | least? I can flip it that way too. | | The "Mendon, Missouri" story had as its theme that small | town/rural America pulls together. There's nuance to | that, and it's a mistake to ignore the nuance. The | Skidmore story illustrates that, and it took place in the | same rural NW Missouri millieu. | sillysaurusx wrote: | Just ignore the haters. As a fellow Missourian, I | appreciated the additional context. | | Your comment was relevant and on-topic. | halffaday wrote: | Having lived in both areas, cities make people crazy. Everyone | spends so much time trying to stand out. Look at my fashionable | clothing. Look at my exotic sexual identity. Nobody is | comfortable in their own skin. There are no consequences to bad | behavior because people are disposable and reputation is | unimportant when there are 10million other suckers that don't | know you're a dirtbag. | | I don't think we've evolved to live among millions of people. | bediger4000 wrote: | Hey,me too! I grew up near Mendon, spent the last 35 years in | city of Denver! I'm qualified too! | | I say the opposite: most urban dwellers just take it easy. | You don't have to conform to whatever ideals your small town | holds. There are freaks, but they don't demand your | participation in their freakery. Live and let live! Living in | a small town is suffocating if you're at all different. | rhexs wrote: | "This was not a small truck. This was a vehicle about the size of | a Sonic Drive-In." | | Has the author ever been to a Sonic Drive-In or was there a | Liebherr T 282B in Mendon Missouri? | boopboopbadoop wrote: | By mass maybe? | pcthrowaway wrote: | Maybe it's the size of the Sonic in Mendon | Miner49er wrote: | RickJWagner wrote: | Great story. | | The day of the train wreck will live on in Mendon for | generations, I'm sure. There will be kids and grand-kids telling | this story in 50 years. | yooo000 wrote: | God Bless America. | aaron695 wrote: | alasdair_ wrote: | Americans are especially good when it comes to large efforts over | the course of a short space of time to solve a major problem. | | Americans are also especially bad at tackling problems that | require a small, consistent, amount of help over a long period of | time. | | I'm honestly not sure why this is. | bigdict wrote: | That's people. | micromacrofoot wrote: | Yeah exactly, big efforts where you see short-term results | are instantly gratifying - you see things change almost | immediately. | | Small gradual changes are hard to see, many people might | overlook them entirely, and the reward is stretched thin or | very far off. You might not even see the full outcome in your | lifetime. | | It's easy to see why people favor short term results. | | This old proverb comes to mind: "A society grows great when | old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never | sit in." | | We've still got a long way to go. | sovande wrote: | On a larger scale, the US Marshall Plan to help Europe back on | its feet after WW2 was immensely important for Europe and for | individuals. My uncle got help funding a successful garment | factory in Bergen, Norway. He could employ over a hundred | women, many widows. Those who still remember are forever | grateful to the US. The same uncle also told me about how the | Flesland airport outside Bergen was constructed. For years | there had been bikesheeding about building an airport outside | Bergen. After the war, it was finally constructed when NATO | needed an airport. The US army came in with large bulldozers, | shaved off the hilltops and put it into the valleys between the | hills and in short time a large airstrip was made. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | Thank you for writing this. Reading it in the USA on our | Independence Day reminds me how wonderful my country can be. | nkrisc wrote: | The former feels like you're doing something to immediate | effect. The latter is invisible, both the solution and the | problem, until it's too late. | | I don't think it's a uniquely American trait. | treis wrote: | There's no real basis for this. America is at the forefront of | any number of long running projects. Cancer research, self | driving cars, and all things space are three things that | immediately jump to mind. | njarboe wrote: | Great to hear these people helping out. I didn't like when people | started using the phrase "First responder" for police, fire, | ambulance people. If you are at the scene of a problem, you can | be a first responder and be there sooner than the "first | responders". You can be a zeroth responder. | InefficientRed wrote: | _> You can be a zeroth responder._ | | You can be. But you can also cause more harm than good as the | zeroth responder (removing an impaled object, moving someone | with a back injury). | | Fortunately, there are affordable high-quality first responder | courses. In the extreme, becoming a certified EMT takes only | 100-200 hours of instruction, and there are many training | options that are much shorter and cam be completed over a | weekend. | bilsbie wrote: | This reminds me of a town I ended up in when I got separated from | the truck transporting me and actually had to do community | service to fix up the roads. | BenFranklin100 wrote: | JaimeThompson wrote: | How are you defining "Woke Progressives"? | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | Pretending that there's a compromise just floating out there | that if we could just get "the extremes" out of the way, would | be embraced by all, is a rosy but ultimately utterly false | fantasy. | | There are very, very different views about the role of | government and religion in this country, very different takes | on morality, responsibility, and lots more. These are not | resolvable via compromise. If things are relatively good | economically, people can generally agree to disagree. When | things are not so good financially (e.g. after 30+ years of the | destruction of the American manufacturing sector and wholesale | movement of capital and labor offshore), this becomes much, | much less easy. | | The answer to "Can't we all just get along" is, fundamentally, | "No, unless we're all doing so well that we don't have to | care". | logifail wrote: | > There are very, very different views about the role of | government and religion in this country, very different takes | on morality, responsibility, and lots more. These are not | resolvable via compromise. | | I spent a lot of my time telling my three kids they _have_ to | learn to compromise [with each other!], since the | alternatives are much, much worse. | | Q: What's the plan for reconcilling "very, very different | views" if one is _not_ going to compromise? | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | There is no plan. These things get resolved by some | combination of: | | 1. civil war 2. political power (domination) 3. secession | 4. overwhelming economic prosperity | logifail wrote: | > These things get resolved by some combination of: 1. | civil war 2. political power (domination) 3. secession | [snip] | | Umm, there would appear to be a fair bit of collateral | damage in those first three. Are you sure you're going to | end up on the winning side? | | Compromise is healthy. Maybe you should reconsider. | stevetodd wrote: | Being a pessimist is easy and lazy. You don't have to lift a | finger. Things can actually get better and do when people | believe it and do even just a little bit. | BenFranklin100 wrote: | realo wrote: | Your "Trump nationalists" is a bit too indulgent for what | they really are. | | Try "Trump's gang of domestic terrorists" instead, for what | they actually are and/or represent. | | Then what you call "the middle" suddenly takes on a very | different , much less reasonable look. | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | Your comment suggests that there's "65%" of the country | that just wants to get along. I'm disputing that. | Clubber wrote: | >When things are not so good financially (e.g. after 30+ | years of the destruction of the American manufacturing | sector and wholesale movement of capital and labor | offshore), this becomes much, much less easy. | | Neither of the political parties are doing anything other | than lip service to entice jobs back. Trump was the only | one to really bring it up in probably 40 years, and he | was lambasted. | | >Your comment suggests that there's "65%" of the country | that just wants to get along. I'm disputing that. | | Based on what? There are only a few wedge issues, I think | aside from those, most people aren't that far off, even | on the issues they are passionate about. The biggest | impediment is that the political parties are both | extremely economically conservative. | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | Bernie Sanders and others associated with the DSA have | been raising the impact of trade and global financial | treaties for decades. Hell, even Ross Perot made "the | giant sucking sound" that NAFTA would create a center | piece of his campaign. Trump never proposed anything at | all that would have addressed the impacts, and hence was | lambasted over this. "I will bring back <dying industry>" | and then doing precisely nothing (often because there's | nothing that could be done) is solid grounds for | ridicule. | | There may only be a "a few" wedge issues, but they | concern the fundamentals of how a society is run and | organized. To name just a few in no particular order: | | role of redistribution in the economy / role of religion | in public education (and education and public life more | widely) / whether or not life begins at conception and | the moral consequences of one's answer / how much (if | any) foreign military intervention / the importance of a | mammoth response to climate change / the extent of and | response to systemic discrimination in historical and | present day society / individual responsibilities during | public health emergencies / the roles and | responsibilities of for-profit corporations in society / | ... | | People _do not agree_ about these things, nor will they. | grumpitron wrote: | A reasonable person reading your comment could infer that | the "other 65%" of Americans are all in agreement on | something, and the reply simply disagreed. | | Sometimes when there is a misunderstanding of the writer's | intent, it is an issue with the clarity of the writing and | not an issue with the reader. | [deleted] | jordanmorgan10 wrote: | Typing in Mendon, Missouri in Apple Maps has the most small town | feel a town could have once iOS zooms in on all four buildings | 999900000999 wrote: | Anywhere in the world if you fall off your bike someone will help | you up. | jacquesm wrote: | As someone who fell off their bike rather hard in my case it | was a 9 year old boy that found me and he really made my day in | how he responded and organized help. | justusthane wrote: | In a similar spirit of small towns rising to the occasion, I'll | take this opportunity to recommend the musical Come From Away | (Apple TV), about the planes grounded in Gander, Newfoundland on | 9/11. A wonderfully told story. | mttjj wrote: | Might be on Netflix in other countries, but it's on AppleTV+ in | the US. | | (Also, if the live production is touring near you- go see it. I | saw it live a few years ago and it was awesome!) | justusthane wrote: | Thanks, fixed -- I misremembered the platform I watched it | on. | photochemsyn wrote: | For some reason this reminded me of the Ray Bradbury story, "The | Town Where Noone Got Off" which is a dark little story indeed | about two men and a small town on a railroad line. This one is a | bit more positive. | | However, it turns out this whole incident was apparently due to | the lack of a railroad crossing guard system of any kind at the | intersection. The most basic system has flashing lights warning | of oncoming trains, and even that wasn't present. | | https://www.kwch.com/2022/06/30/amtrak-derailment-places-spo... | | In that respect it's also a story about the poor state of | American infrastructure. | rustymonday wrote: | You must not drive out in the country often. Railroad crossing | with lights are not common outside busy roads. The most you'll | have is a railroad crossing sign. Certainly a flashing light | system is safer, but you (and that news article) make it sound | like it's absence is unusual. | mindslight wrote: | The absence of traffic control devices isn't unusual, but | it's most certainly condemnable. | | Being in a denser area where crossings generally have a light | and a gate, it really irks me when I see a no-visibility at- | grade crossing with just an intended-to-be-ignored "yield" | sign for the road. It's nothing more than a pathetic fiction | to legally cover the railroads ass after the fact, and the | setup should be outright illegal. | | I've experienced different expectations in less dense areas | with generally clear landscapes, say where a single main road | runs parallel to the tracks and all the branches on one side | cross the tracks. But overall US railroad standards are stuck | in the 19th century and we shouldn't just accept that state | of affairs. | VictorPath wrote: | This is the real story behind the story - a giant | corporation creating a dangerous situation for the sake of | profit, a government which does not protect people but | corporate profits, and a small town that sits by and allows | this to happen, but will pitch in and carry off the bodies | when tragedy inevitably strikes. One person in the town did | try to prevent this, but one person is not enough in the | face of everyone else. "The national tapestry that is The | Great American Small Town" indeed. | solardev wrote: | (Disclaimer: This is just personal knowledge from a | casual observer and occasional passenger. I traveled | cross-country by Amtrak a few times and loved it, and | wanted to learn a bit about its history.) | | Amtrak isn't quite the giant evil corporation in the | sense that Amazon is. If anything, it's more of a dying | relic propped up by sheer nostalgia. Congress keeps it on | life support with small, occasional injections of funds. | Its infrastructure and equipment aren't just obsolete, | but dying, neglected by a nation who's almost entirely | switched to automobiles and planes. Amtrak is a lifeline | into the heartland, where many small towns have no other | transit options. | | But Amtrak is largely unprofitable outside of the | Northeast Corridor, which runs up and down the East Coast | and has fancy commuter trains for the rich businesspeople | and politicians. The rest of its network runs on decades- | old equipment and trains and barely keeps up with | operating expenditures. It shares rail lines with freight | trains, but is subordinate to them, so passengers have to | wait any time a freight train wants the track. | | It's stuck in a catch-22. | | As a business, it can't turn a profit because, at current | ticket prices, it is often slower and more expensive than | flights -- not even considering the money lost due to | time off of work. For shorter hauls, intercity buses are | often quicker, cheaper, and have more time slots. It's | not really a practical way to travel for most people in | our economy except as a form of recreation, almost like a | land cruise, or for small towns with no other options, or | certain religious sects that don't drive (Mennonites). So | it's not just a very profitable business thing to begin | with. | | So why don't we just nationalize it and run it as a | national utility? We can't; it was specifically founded | in the 70s to NOT be a government-run service. | Nonetheless, in the decades since, it stays alive only | because of government injections... yet it can't be | directly run by the government. | | So it's a private business that can't survive on its own, | doesn't have enough capital to do anything differently, | and can't go out of business because Congress keeps | propping it up. It's literally just stuck on life | support. The wiki on it is pretty interesting reading: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak#Public_funding | | Covid hit them pretty hard too and caused a lot of | shutdowns. They have to negotiate with something like 20 | different unions to keep operating, when they've already | been unprofitable for decades. Biden gave them more | money, but I think that just keeps the death spiral going | for a bit longer rather than actually fixing anything. | | Personally, I think the age of passenger rail is sadly | behind us. A part of me wishes they could resurrect under | a different model, maybe more like a fancy land-based | cruise ship, with fun amenities on board, more sleeper | cabins, things for young people (clubs, pubs, games, | maybe even traveling concerts), whatever -- e.g. make the | train its own destination. But that requires both the | will to transform their service and the capital to do so, | and they have neither. And so, for the foreseeable | future, Congress keeps paying, and the train keeps a | rollin'... | InefficientRed wrote: | On the contrary, OP correctly identified that lacking even | basic safety systems is a pervasive issue and not a one-off | oversight in the case of this small town: | | _> > In that respect it's also a story about the poor state | of American infrastructure._ | kodah wrote: | Interestingly, it's the line operator that usually has to | establish and maintain those according to federal and | (whatever) state guidelines might exist. | cagey wrote: | I believe that this is incorrectly simplistic, if only | because these sorts of situations by definition exist at the | interface between a railroad and either a private or | government road. Having the line operator (which I'm taking | to mean railroad owner, in this case BNSF) bear 100% of the | burden of providing full crossing protection creates an | unbalanced situation (in terms of the cost to be borne). I'm | not an expert, but have been following a forum thread on this | topic (this Amtrak-truck collision and how to prevent | repeats)[0] which points to articles stating that this | particular crossing has been "on the list" of not the RR | owner (BNSF) but MODOT (Missouri [state] Dept of | Transportation) for receiving a "crossing gates and lights" | (automated protection) deployment, and that the cost of this | prospective deployment is approximately USD400K (per | crossing) which would be _shared_ by the state (MODOT) and | BNSF, and that, as noted by others posting in this thread, | there are a large number (probably the majority) of RR /road | crossings in the state (and country) which are similarly | unprotected, and whose low use rate has historically not | justified the installation and ongoing maintenance costs of | full crossing protection. A cynic on the linked[0] thread | mentioned it was possible that MODOT had put _every_ | unprotected RR /road crossing "on the list" to receive a full | protection equipment deployment, so that in case of any | similar accident, they could claim to "already be working on | a solution, just didn't get there in time" as in bureaucratic | CYA. | | Given the costs involved, IMO it would probably be better to | close at least half of the crossings in (e.g. relatively flat | farmland) areas where the road grid incurs these crossings at | a rate more than one per mile. But as with decisions to spend | money, choosing _which_ crossings to close (ostensibly so | that the remainder may have automated protection added) | becomes a political "hot potato" that can easily cause the | process to stall. | | [0] https://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/292768.aspx | | [1] https://www.kansascity.com/news/state/missouri/article263 | 049... | mindslight wrote: | This cost sharing hot potato is itself part of the problem. | It's ridiculous to have privately-owned infrequently-used | tracks having precedence over well-used public roads, and | then making mitigating the resulting contention into a | shared responsibility. It's akin to someone putting up a | yield sign on the road next to their driveway, and then | just pulling out without caring because they technically | own up until the center of the road. | | Rather BNSF et al should be paying for the full cost of | their own infrastructure, either by building out the | necessary safety devices or simply ending the full-speed | aspect of the crossings they don't want to pay for. And I | say this as someone who like trains, has taken the | Southwest Chief cross country a few times, and wishes we | had more passenger rail in general. | cagey wrote: | The RR line on which the collision near Mendon, MO | occurred is the furthest thing from "infrequently-used | tracks"; these tracks are part of the "BNSF Southern | Transcon[tinental]" line[0] between Los Angeles, CA and | Chicago, IL, which carries (per previously linked Trains | Forum thread: "Posted by tree68 on Thursday, June 30, | 2022 7:59 PM") "The FRA/DOT crossing data shows over 50 | trains a day..." (wikipedia[0] provides a higher number). | And the vast majority of the BNSF Southern Transcon in MO | (and elsewhere) is double-tracked, meaning trains can | (and usually do) run near full track speed (90 mph in my | understanding) without the frequent need to stop for | opposing-direction traffic as would be typical on single- | track lines. | | Also, I don't know if you were applying the term to the | road of the crossing involved in this crash, but this | road is not one I would characterize as "well used"; more | like "exceedingly rarely used" (thus the lack of active | crossing protection). | | Finally according to the previously referenced Trains | Forum thread ("Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, June | 29, 2022 11:32 AM"), the railroad existed 60-70 years | prior to the road in question. I _believe_ it is this | circumstance which places the onus on MODOT to defend the | users of their later-arriving road from hazards | associated with rail traffic on the preexisting BNSF line | (with BNSF being an involved party). | | I understand citing posts another public forum does not | necessarily meet the gold standard of citations, but all | of these facts align with my preexisting understanding of | the situation. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Transcon calls | out Mendon, MO as a station on the Marceline subdivision | mindslight wrote: | I was talking in generalities. As I said in another | comment, I'm in a more dense region where level non-gated | crossings tend to be branches for factories and the like. | So I've seen plenty of roads that are decorated with some | train tracks (with a toss up as to whether they're even | active), but still carry the nonsensical presumption that | every passing vehicle should somehow have to yield to | nonexistent trains going at unknown speeds. | | The specific busyness of these tracks is all the more | reason all crossings should be lighted/gated. And while | we're at it, there should be sensors/cameras to check for | stuck vehicles and communicate that to the train a few | miles away - if a train going at 90mph takes 3 miles to | stop, that actually means the gates only need to come | down two minutes before the train gets to the crossing. | But there's no impetus to proactively address such | problems until the incentives are reformed. | | > _I believe it is this circumstance which places the | onus on MODOT to defend the users of their later-arriving | road from hazards associated with rail traffic on the | preexisting BNSF line_ | | Sure, but understanding the legal justification doesn't | change what I said. This is an instance where the common | law first-come first-serve system completely fails. See | also: water "rights". It would be a different story if | the tracks were also a public way and open for use by | everyone, but in general private control over the commons | should be rejected. | cagey wrote: | Your solution proposal appears to be: | | If BNSF is not already today 100% responsible for | installing & maintaining maximal protection equipment at | _all_ RR /road crossings that were installed by | government over its preexisting tracks, | | then BNSF should have all of its property (tracks and | right of way (RR track bearing real estate)) converted | into "the commons" (i.e. BNSF should be nationalized) | | and the owner of "the commons" (government) will then | resolve _all_ RR /road crossing safety issues (by RR | closure, road closure, or deployment of crossing | improvements sufficient to match safety levels attained | in the country having the safest RR/road crossings in the | world, at its prerogative) all while operating the new | national RR (carrying freight and passengers) safely and | efficiently to ensure supply line problems attributable | to RR causes do not worsen. | | Is this accurate? | kodah wrote: | I used to work for BNSF, I'm well aware of how those | programs materialize on the private end. Sometimes states | will chip in, but it's mostly on the line owner. You can't | just install a crossing anymore. They're wired into | national and global networks that are part of track-side | overhauls. Additionally, when AMTRAK goes over BNSF lines | (at least when I worked there) you don't have automated | train control (which is really braking). A signal is a good | first step, but if your goal is to really put a dent in | these kinds of incidents then it's a lot of on-going cost - | mostly born by the tail operator because they're the ones | that lease access to the lines. | cagey wrote: | The situation is quite confusing. Restricting the | discussion to the vast numbers of existing RR/road | crossings (not new crossings), then to what degree does | the state control the installation of automated crossing | protection (upgrades)? The various articles I read about | this crash strongly suggest that MODOT is largely | throttling which RR/road crossing automated protection | upgrades are executed, and implies this throttling is | largely because of state spending limits. But if as you | say most of the cost of these upgrades is to be borne by | BNSF, why would MODOT be reluctant to compel BNSF to | spend money upgrading crossing protection throughout | their state? If BNSF had refused such "suggestions" by | the state, I would expect to made aware, post crash, of | how evil BNSF was in not performing needed safety | upgrades requested/commanded by the state, how the state | is suing BNSF to compel them to do so, and how BNSF is | 100% liable for the damages related to this crash. But | that isn't what I read in any of the articles related to | this crash. This strongly suggests to me that the state | bears significant, perhaps gating, responsibility here. | | Any clarification of what's going on in this regard would | be appreciated. | msrenee wrote: | I can find you a dozen such crossings within an hour of my | house. If you care to head into the properly rural part of any | state, you'll find they're everywhere. There ought to be | flashing lights and arms at every one, but no one wants to foot | that bill. | | Was the truck actively crossing the tracks when it got hit or | was it disabled? I haven't found any explanation of why it was | there. | dreamcompiler wrote: | It seems to have been at least trying to cross, as it had | been crossing for the past couple of days delivering rock to | a levee project [1]. If you look at the crossing on Google | maps [2] it's clear that the crossing is not at right angles. | If the dump truck had been northbound at the crossing (and I | don't know if it was), the driver would have had to turn his | head more than 90 degrees to the left to see the train (which | was coming from the west). | | Local residents had apparently been warning of the danger of | this particular crossing for some time [1]. A mockup of the | accident scene is at [0]. | | The lawsuits have begun [3]. One of the suits alleges that | the trucking company failed to properly maintain its | equipment, which suggests to me the possibility that the | truck stalled on the tracks. | | [0] https://www.kansascity.com/news/state/missouri/article263 | 060... | | [1] https://www.kansascity.com/news/state/missouri/article262 | 969... | | [2] https://goo.gl/maps/n7WNSFMiqYgbEQQp9 | | [3] https://www.kansascity.com/news/state/missouri/article263 | 084... | SamPatt wrote: | I don't care about such crossings, it's trivially easy to | check for a train. I live in a rural area with many of these | crossings and (to my knowledge) there haven't been any | problems. | | I don't think this is an infrastructure failing as much as it | is a "Why would we need that?" | exar0815 wrote: | I have witnessed something quite similar. During the flash-floods | in 2021 in Germany, locals in the Ahr region absolutely rose to | the occasion. Farmers were evacuating people in head-high water | with their tractors during the night, local restaurants were | already providing hot food and water the next morning wherever | they could reach, pharmacies were loading whatever they had | available on ATVs to somehow get much-needed medicine down | precarious mudpaths. Local construction companies were already | clearing rubble and building emergency bridges out of it. One | Excavator was just basically standing in the middle of the river | and ferrying people and rescue partys across. The local racetrack | basically just organized everything while politicians were still | playing the blame game. When our local firebrigade was officially | pulled back from active duty because we lost one of ours during | rescue operations in the first day, basically everyone just went | down again and just tried to do whatever was possible. Absolutely | stunning what people will do when they are face to face with | disaster. I freely admit that I was crying like a little girl | when I first saw the endless columns of Bundeswehr, THW, Fire | Brigades, Farmers, basically everyone who could just streaming to | help people they never met but were neighbors and friends for me. | | Sorry for the rambling, but I am still not emotionally | disconnected enough from it to concisely talk about it. | mlyle wrote: | Yes. I think people are good overall. | | I think the biggest reason people in small towns may be a bit | quicker to help is that people in cities are a little | conditioned by the bystander effect to assume that people | around them, or the authorities, are better equipped to help. | | But any random individual asked for help in a city is likely to | go well beyond their duty and be quite helpful. | townied wrote: | Having gone small town to "the city," my interactions with | other humans are by and large a net negative to the point | that it's almost better for one's sanity to not involve | outside of whatever communities you have therein. | | Having spent a decade now here, it feels a bit like when | you're getting a cavity ground out at the dentist and they | finally hit the nerve. Spending time away, "back home" or in | some other tight-knit society only seems to fill it in for it | to be ground back down. | | For the folks that can and do thrive in "the city," I find it | fascinating on how we must differ in mind and spirit. | InefficientRed wrote: | _> or the authorities, are better equipped to help._ | | It's not just "equipped to help". It's also that random | untrained people can do more harm than good. Hell, even | random _trained_ people can do more harm that good when there | are too many people around. | | I'm not a medical professional, but I have some first aid | training and have been the most-trained first responder in | not-even-crowded areas on a few occasions. Even with only 10 | people around, managing the crowd while providing care | becomes difficult. | | The article even mentions: | | _> "It was a wonderful problem to have," said school | district superintendent, Eric Hoyt, "but we probably had too | many volunteers show up."_ | | In a town of 171 people. Just 171 people, and crowd | management became a problem. | | Now drop into Manhattan, with approximately 1.629 million | more people. If "everyone" showed up to an incident, you'd | have at least an order of magnitude more deaths from the | stampede to help than from the original event. | | People in dense cities move away from the scene of an | accident in order to _get out of the way_ , which in most | cases is genuinely the best thing they can do to help. | mlyle wrote: | Yah-- I'm not even quite talking about that, though. | Whether someone else is better qualified to help in a given | circumstance or not, we're conditioned to not get involved | because _someone else will_. Hence, the bystander effect, | which stops people from being helpful even when they could. | | I have first aid training, too, and my impulse is not to | rush to help but to look around at other people and see if | they're going to do something. | karaterobot wrote: | > But any random individual asked for help in a city is | likely to go well beyond their duty and be quite helpful. | | Fortunately yes, though I think I'd still give the edge to | small towns for this. In cities, people are a lot more wary | of being scammed, since it happens more often in areas with | more people. | lotsofpulp wrote: | > I think people are good overall. | | Until a certain amount of sacrifices have to be made. Then | things start getting tribal. The sacrifices do not even have | to be material, simply sacrificing or losing socioeconomic | status relative to others is sufficient. | la64710 wrote: | Tribes are actually very benevolent and certainly helpful | to many strangers that in their eyes seek help. There have | been numerous incidents all around the world where poor | tribals have come and nurture a sick stranger back to life. | It is basic human nature. | jan_Inkepa wrote: | > >Yes. I think people are good overall. | | > Until a certain amount of sacrifices have to be made. | | I remember some political philosophy online course from | some reasonably reputable American college that was quite | nicely set up - it had a lecturer and two token students (a | man and a woman). At some point the lecturer asked the | students (IIRC the topic was anarchism) if they thought | that people were fundamentally basically good - the man was | like "yeah I think people are basically good", the woman | said something along the lines of "Well, I grew up in | Yugoslavia, so not really..." | sassy_quat wrote: | Retake political science please. | | The advent of the agricultural revolution, the telegraph, | and the teletype each resulted in massive increases in | "tribal size". To the point that after the teletype, it was | a bipolar cold war. | | So I don't think you have any qualifications to say a | single word in this matter. | dang wrote: | Your comment has broken the site guidelines badly. We ban | accounts that do that, so could you please review | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and | stick to the rules when posting here? We definitely don't | want swipes or flamebait in HN comments. | lotsofpulp wrote: | I have no idea what your comment is trying to convey, but | to help clarify my comment, this might help: | | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lbj-convince-the- | lowest-wh... | | I posit that at the root of all societal friction is the | widening income/wealth gap within the US, along with | shifting socioeconomic statuses with some losing ground | and some gaining ground. | | Note that people are in many tribes of many sizes | simultaneously, and constantly shifting priorities and | allegiances as it suits them, and trying to figure out | others' priorities and allegiances. | kortilla wrote: | > I posit that at the root of all societal friction is | the widening income/wealth gap within the US, | | Why would you think this when there is little meaningful | difference income-wise between Democrats and Republicans? | | A significant chunk of the US votes on single issue | matters that have nothing to do with economic status | (abortion, gun rights). | mlyle wrote: | I don't agree that the root is the income/wealth gap, but | it certainly is playing a big role in the divide. | | > little meaningful difference income-wise between | Democrats and Republicans? | | https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape- | stu... is striking-- and when you look into the sub- | demographics of the lowest and highest band it gets more | interesting still-- e.g. that 27% in the lowest income | band is _shockingly_ rural. | kortilla wrote: | >certainly is playing a big role in the divide. | | The only divide is in whether it's something that is even | a problem that needs to be addressed. Income inequality | doesn't divide people itself, just the focus on it does. | mlyle wrote: | > Income inequality doesn't divide people itself | | I don't agree. We're increasingly divided along lines | that are very well correlated with demographic factors. | Like, age, sure, but also income, religion, race, etc. | | And the link makes it pretty clear income is a pretty | strong predictor of political leanings. (And when you | combine income + rural/urban split, it's a very strong | one). | jessaustin wrote: | In other nations (e.g. Mexico, Peru, Ghana, Thailand, | etc.) health care is provided to all. In USA lots of | people can't afford any sort of health care. The family | left behind by someone who dies at 48 because he couldn't | afford e.g. blood pressure medication doesn't need any | sort of "focus" to see the divide. | | Health care is just the starkest illustration of this. | One sees the same phenomenon with any other necessity: | housing, food, transportation, etc. | mlyle wrote: | I don't see how his comment justifies yours-- either your | reading of it (I don't see any claims about "tribal size" | in his comment, and I'm sure we're all aware that there's | a whole range of affiliations we have from large-- | 'Murica-- to small-- HN fans) or the vitriol. | | Be kind, please. | worik wrote: | speak for yourself | Threeve303 wrote: | I have found otherwise good people are capable of | intentionally doing awful things to another human, even if | you have known someone almost your entire life, a switch | flips and it is like a full psychopath is unlocked. Many | only need the moral cover, certain they are right, to say | and do awful things to another. | | This was always true but it seems to me that social media, | in all its forms, not only takes your privacy, it also | takes your empathy. At the root of many mental health | disorders exists narcissism and for the past few decades an | increasing number of people have been added to the empathy | erasing internet hate machine. | | Just look around, the proof is everywhere. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | The proof of kindness is everywhere, too. Just look | around. | adventured wrote: | In most cases people see what they prefer to see. Their | response to such impossible questions tells you more | about them - how they see the world, their sense of life | - than it does humanity at large. | bloomingeek wrote: | I agree, this is a hard subject, whether people are good | or not. I've always believed we're all capable of doing | good under certain conditions, but let most get out of | their comfort zone and they'll turn on you like a mad | dog. (sorry) Proof? just look at our political scene the | last 5 plus years. I won't debate any thing ideologically | anymore with co-workers, they simply default to anger | when you press them to explain how they feel and why | about any difficult ideas. | neuronic wrote: | Thank you for bringing this up, it was the parallel story that | first popped into my mind as well, as this was a national | tragedy of rare proportions. | | To me the amount of people streaming from everywhere in the | entire country (!) to help fix up a region that has been struck | with disaster moved me to tears more than once now. | | And the happier I am about this circumstance, the angrier I get | at politicians and some media. | manor wrote: | bpodgursky wrote: | mmmpop wrote: | [deleted] | sixothree wrote: | Having lived in the deep south, it's easy to see the paradox. | Vehemently, deeply racist and judgmental people willing acting | so selflessly at random occasions. Southern manners are usually | just a facade masking hatred. I hate to say these things, but | it is true. | tootie wrote: | People can be nice while simultaneously not being good. | Ancapistani wrote: | I've heard the following said: | | "Southerns will hate the group but love the person. | Northerners will love the group but hate the person" | | Obviously that's way oversimplified, but it's broadly | reflective of what I've seen. I've seen open casual racism in | the South followed by kindness and empathy toward individual | members of that race. I've seen public "performative" | condemnation of racism in the North followed by quietly | limiting the opportunity of individual members of that race | by the very same people. | | In my experience, Southern manners aren't a "facade". They're | the way people interact with the world. They do things out of | a sense of duty, even - perhaps _especially_ when doing it | requires that they put aside their feelings about the matter. | sixothree wrote: | We can talk Missouri in particular. Just a year or two ago | there were anti-blm protests. I saw signs people were | carrying with the n-word on them. This was in public and on | television. | | And I'm guessing this same person will use their southern | manners accordingly when they come across a black person in | their daily life. | mcphage wrote: | Is the author's claim that modern journalism doesn't contain | enough feel-good human interest stories? | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | No. The author indicated that the exceptional (and it was, | indeed, "exceptional") generosity and sense of Duty, exhibited | by the townsfolk was ignored by the press. | | It was probably a bit "whiny," but it was not incorrect. | | I do feel that publicizing examples of generosity of spirit | would help in healing our nation, but he's right, in that it | doesn't sell papers. | mcphage wrote: | > The author indicated that the exceptional (and it was, | indeed, "exceptional") generosity and sense of Duty | | The author took pains to assert that it wasn't exceptional: | | >> And the most unusual thing about all this is: None of this | is unusual | | >> believe me, they happen. Every day. Every hour. Ordinary | Americans will astound you with their goodwill | | > was ignored by the press | | Well, they're right in that I didn't hear anything about this | specific train derailment, but heart-warming human interest | stories are a pretty regular staple of even the national | press. | | > I do feel that publicizing examples of generosity of spirit | would help in healing our nation | | I'm not so sure. Our nation isn't breaking apart because we | can't pull together in a crisis, it's breaking apart because | we can't stand together outside of a crisis. Americans want | very different things, and pulling together in a crisis only | helps when we're in crisis mode. | phtrivier wrote: | > Americans want very different things, and pulling | together in a crisis only helps when we're in crisis mode | | The world _is_ in crisis mode. | | Unfortunately, some people have a vested interest in | looking at the train crash, and not helping, and maybe even | preventing people from helping. | | (I can't help but picture the "train-crash denier" next to | the boy scout, explaning that the train did not crash, it's | all a scam from you-know-who to restrict your liberties or | serve the car industry, wake up sheeple, etc...) | kodah wrote: | I mean, this is a crisis. There's a constitutional crisis | in terms of two extremely divergent views of how to | understand the constitution that both carry significant | trajectory changes and neither of which sound very helpful. | There's a political crisis going on with neo-nazi influence | in and around the Republican party that's not being dealt | with at all. There's a digital war on-going that's been | heating up for the past two-ish decades that promises to | get worse. There's a literal housing crisis. There's more, | but that's a short list I think most people can agree on. | mlyle wrote: | > ... extremely divergent views of how to understand the | constitution... | | IMO, there's good in this situation, because inferring a | nebulous right to privacy that didn't do very much was | always a little questionable thing for the supreme court | to do. It was a "good enough" measure that prevented us | from doing any better. | | Yes, it's terrible that poor women in red states will | have to pay the price. | | But ultimately, we're going to have to figure out how to | define a right to privacy and make it into real law. And | we can maybe fix other things, like security/privacy in | our papers and effects and not rely upon 19th century | judicial compromises on policing power and searches, too. | | > There's a political crisis going on with neo-nazi | influence in and around the Republican party that's not | being dealt with at all | | Honestly, the Republican party is <<slowly>> making | itself less relevant. Which is kind of bad-- a relevant | and not-crazy political opposition is a useful thing to a | society. | rospaya wrote: | > No. The author indicated that the exceptional (and it was, | indeed, "exceptional") generosity and sense of Duty, | exhibited by the townsfolk was ignored by the press. | | Man bites dog is news. Dog bites man isn't. Sorry to be cold | and unaffectionate (I love the story though) but I believe it | happens regulary. Big town, small town, there's good people | everywhere. | phtrivier wrote: | I'm pretty sure there is a market for a social network that | would tweak their algorithm to present positive content | rather than the usual junk, though. | | It's not like FB or twitter doesn't have the resource and | skill to A/B test that - but I'm pretty sure their biased | by the 19th century tradition of "sex sells, and we only | have one frontpage". | toomuchtodo wrote: | Terrible people everywhere too. I like hearing about the | good folks. It invigorates my soul. Hope is important! | ShroudedNight wrote: | > Man bites dog is news. Dog bites man isn't. | | I become increasingly convinced that a significant part of | our deficiency in reporting is that we've conflated "news" | with "current affairs" long enough that we've forgotten | that both are actually worthy of mental bandwidth. | tptacek wrote: | Yes. It's a bit of a thing with him. | mcphage wrote: | Well then--I guess that's better than I was expecting, given | how often "ordinary Americans" is a dogwhistle. I don't agree | that journalism needs more feels good stories... but they | could do worse. | xbar wrote: | Is this a question you are asking in good faith, because I | think it is clear that he is not making that claim? | mcphage wrote: | > I think it is clear that he is not making that claim? | | This is the second last line of the piece, where the author | explicitly makes that claim: | | >> Although we rarely hear about such acts of compassion and | lovingkindness within our society, believe me, they happen. | Every day. Every hour. Ordinary Americans will astound you | with their goodwill. Sadly, ordinary American journalists | aren't interested in being astounded by such things. | | Maybe that's not what they're trying to get across--if not, | I'd like to hear what you think it is--but I like how you | jump to "acting in bad faith". | xbar wrote: | I think your question was rhetorical in casting journalism | that focuses on American goodwill as "human interest" was | designed to engender an angry response; that it was a | trollish question where you already had an answer that was | baiting; that you were not at all asking that question; | that you were expressing an opinion. | | I think your responses affirm my read. | mcphage wrote: | > casting journalism that focuses on American goodwill as | "human interest" was designed to engender an angry | response | | Much like a passenger train barreling full speed into a | dump truck, you made one severe mistake at the beginning | and rode it head first into a spectacular disaster. | marssaxman wrote: | There is an excellent book on this theme, which I have been | recommending liberally for several years: "A Paradise Built in | Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster". | | https://www.amazon.com/Paradise-Built-Hell-Extraordinary-Com... | ethbr0 wrote: | Looks like Kansas City news picked it up. | | KSHB - https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/mendon-missouri- | communi... | | KCUR - https://www.kcur.org/news/2022-06-28/amtrak-derailment- | mendo... | ryan_j_naughton wrote: | > And the most unusual thing about all this is: None of this is | unusual. At least not within the national tapestry that is The | Great American Small Town. | | It also isn't unusual in the cities. Humans are wonderful and | terrible everywhere. It reminds me of the 30 Rock episode where | Jack and Liz go to Georgia to find a new comedian in touch with | the "real America" and Liz keeps insisting that all Americans are | real Americans and there is no "real America." | | The acts of people after 9/11 in NYC remind us of the good in | humans just as this small town inspires us. | | As Mr Rogers said, "When I was a boy and I would see scary things | in the news, my mother would say to me, "Look for the helpers. | You will always find people who are helping." | turdit wrote: | "It also isn't unusual in the cities." | | yes it is. last week i saw a homeless man follow a woman onto a | packed train, scream in her face and throw her across the | train, and nobody did anything. i'll let you guess the races of | the victim and the attacker. this was on the L in union square. | no one cares. this country has been dying for decades and it's | almost completely dead | kiernanmcgowan wrote: | When I lived in Chicago I saw the aftermath of a car/moped | accident up close. I had just gotten off the L at Western and | was walking to the north exit. To my right was a moped turning | left under the tracks and to my left was a sedan driving out of | an alley, also turning under the tracks. | | I heard a crunch and a group of people at the exit all jumped | and rushed over. I hadn't seen the actual accident, but feared | the worst. Once I was street level the group that had rushed | over had already called 911, was comforting the person on the | moped (they were fine, at most concussed), and directing | traffic around the accident. I ended up leaving because there | wasn't anything to do and didn't want to get in the way. | | 60 seconds was all it took for a group of strangers to provide | an overwhelming amount of help. | | Walking home, I heard the siren of the ambulance, but that | eventually faded as I walked another block or so, the scene of | the accident swallowed by the vastness of the city. | | I probably walked past a couple hundred people or so that | evening, all of them unaware of what had happened under | Western, yet filled with the hope all of them could provide an | overwhelming amount of help. | nickysielicki wrote: | I agree. One of the things that was visible to me as a | transplant to Houston was how much city pride there was in how | people came together after Harvey, even years after. | tootie wrote: | 30 Rock also spoofed the "Subway Hero". A real story of a | person falling on the tracks from a seizure and bystander | jumped down and pressed them both into the track well while a | train ran over them. There's alway bystanders and I'm sure the | dynamics of a small town are different. Especially when a rush | hour subway platform might have more people than Mendon. | melenaboija wrote: | Although I agree with it I think that small towns have | something that is lost in big cities which is the sense of | community, and that is simply because in towns you know every | single person that has some impact in your daily live. | | My family is from a small town who moved to the city right | before I was born and there is something my mom said to me when | I was a kid that got stuck in my mind which is the awareness of | death, in big cities is like people don't die because you don't | know about it. Although it may sound macabre I think that | knowing about death helps me better understand being alive. | formerkrogemp wrote: | > Although I agree with it I think that small towns have | something that is lost in big cities which is the sense of | community, and that is simply because in towns you know every | single person that has some impact in your daily live. My | family is from a small town who moved to the city right | before I was born and there is something my mom said to me | when I was a kid that got stuck in my mind which is the | awareness of death, in big cities is like people don't die | because you don't know about it. | | Cities have plentiful and varied communities, but it's easier | to be lost in the masses. Many people lose empathy amongst so | many other humans, or so some claim. | | I was raised in a small town. Every coin has its other side. | "Every single person has an impact on your life." Certainly | if the community disapproves of your appearance, skin color, | or religion, they can ostracize you, they'll each take turns | with their individual impact to turn your life to shit. | | Small towns can be bucolic, beautiful, and communal, however | your mileage may vary dramatically from in-group to in-group | and tribe to tribe. Beware your own scarlet letter, whether | it's your skin color, religion, or otherwise. | | > Although it may sound macabre I think that knowing about | death helps me better understand being alive. | | Wise words. | BurningFrog wrote: | I think it's a basic feature of human nature that every | ingroup has an outgroup. | mlyle wrote: | Sure. But in a big city, you'll find that groups you're | "out" of don't affect you as much. | | In a small town, if the town is the ingroup, and you're | the outgroup... you're going to have a bad time. | BurningFrog wrote: | Yeah, I think that's the pro & con of living in a "real | community". | melenaboija wrote: | > Small towns can be bucolic, beautiful, and communal, | however your mileage may vary dramatically from in-group to | in-group and tribe to tribe. Beware your own scarlet | letter, whether it's your skin color, religion, or | otherwise | | Totally agree and that is probably one of the reasons I | never went back to my town. Sense of belonging and | tribalism definitely comes with drawbacks but also builds a | feeling of having to stay together to move forward which is | what makes that things like the post happen. | cortesoft wrote: | The downside of the small town community is if you are not | accepted in it. There is no alternative. | | In cities, you have many communities, and if you aren't | accepted in one you can find another. | redtexture wrote: | A fishing community / island in Maine I know of, forced a | thief and their family off the island by completely | withdrawing all assistance. | | You cannot live on an island in Maine without community | cgriswald wrote: | That sense of community comes roaring back in times of | calamity. | | I've only ever lived in cities or suburbs. During a major | calamity, those of us in the city drove out to a small town | that was nearly wiped out and gave supplies, money, and time. | When our own city was hit by an extremely damaging and deadly | storm, we took care of our neighbors (generators for | refrigerators, places to sleep, help with repairs, food, | etc), even if we had just met them for the first time. | skeeter2020 wrote: | smaller communities exist in big cities too. They might be | neighbourhoods like a small town, or interest, cause or | activity-based. The trick is not to defer to government to | provide them for you, which I think is harder in big centers. | InefficientRed wrote: | Harkening back to the GP post: Mr. Rogers Neighborhood was | based on a city neighborhood, not a small town. | louky wrote: | Seasame Street, as well. | orzig wrote: | This is very true - some apartment buildings have great | community (of course, plenty don't). Demographics certainly | drive part of the distinction, but just having a person | step up and do the barest amount of leadership is also | critical. | skeeter2020 wrote: | I'm old enough to have experienced the slow, quiet, patient | love of Mr Rogers first hand; I'm not sure it's able to rise | above today's noisy fears? I hope I'm wrong. | WorldPeas wrote: | I'd sadly say that the trust and love for | community(especially in cities) has waned quite a bit, even | in gentrified areas I see parents afraid to let their kids | walk to the store. l'd say it's another casualty of the typo | of journalism this article mentions, all fear no friends. | Clubber wrote: | >"This is a crisis for our democracy and our society," said | Penelope Muse Abernathy, a visiting professor at Medill and | primary author of the report, in a statement. | | Why is everything a crisis now? The crying of wolf gets tiresome | and it makes it easy to tune out, probably to the detriment of | local newspapers. | | Oops, replied to the wrong article. | pjbeam wrote: | I didn't see this quote in the article--what are you referring | to? | Clubber wrote: | Oops I must have replied in the wrong article. It was in | reference to this: | | https://www.axios.com/2022/07/04/local-newspapers-news- | deser... | fortran77 wrote: | One way to see rural MO is on the Katy bike trail: | | https://mostateparks.com/park/katy-trail-state-park | | It's a 240 mile protected bike path. | jeremiemyhren wrote: | And ironically one of the most popular ways to "do" the Katy | trail is to take the Amtrak to Kansas City since that train has | bike stowage, and riding the trail from west to east is | (generally) all downhill. | toomuchtodo wrote: | Is it relatively easy to get back to Chicago from the eastern | terminus of the bike trail? | moomoo11 wrote: | Awesome thanks! | tnorthcutt wrote: | And if you like that you'll also like the Mickelson Trail in | South Dakota: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_S._Mickelson_Trail | psmith50 wrote: | Rode the entire trail in 3 days in 2016! Quite the challenge | for myself at the time and living out of your bike was a blast. | Got to talk and meet many locals and go into many small towns | to resupply food and enjoy the ride. My total milage ended up | being 270 miles. | freediver wrote: | Love HN for gems like this. | Linda703 wrote: ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-04 23:00 UTC)