[HN Gopher] Delayed Messages on iOS ___________________________________________________________________ Delayed Messages on iOS Author : karagenit Score : 114 points Date : 2022-07-04 18:54 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (caleb.software) (TXT) w3m dump (caleb.software) | [deleted] | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | I think this is a cool hack. And I frequently use delayed | messages on Google Messages to obscure my late working hours and | refrain from disturbing people with a 3AM notification. | | But I've thought about this a bit recently, and I don't think I | should have to worry about bothering someone at 3 AM. I don't | think it's unreasonable to expect other people to have do not | disturb on / notifications off whenever they don't want to be | disturbed. | | And one cautionary tale about scheduling messages (email in | particular): I once encountered a problem at 3AM and scheduled an | 8AM text to tell someone about it, but they woke up at 6AM and | immediately fixed it and were confused why I still had the | problem two hours later (when my message arrived). | duxup wrote: | I'd be ok with messages in a business app (teams, slack or | whatever) at whatever hour. But if people are sending me | iMessages to my personal phone number I'd be annoyed at just | waking to a bunch of work stuff in there. | | Context would really depend on my response to asynchronous | messages piling up. | shaky-carrousel wrote: | Except for the part where you send me a message at 3 am about a | work-related issue while I was placidly browsing Reddit and now | you made me worry about work-related issues while on leisure | time. | | Work-related messages during working hours, please. | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | I agree, to be clear I continue to schedule messages despite | my inner dialogue. | matwood wrote: | Whose work hours? Times have changed where many people no | longer have the same 8ish work hour overlap. There are tz | differences and Flex Time. It's up to you to manage your | messages. | TameAntelope wrote: | No. Manage your own messaging systems, don't put that extra | work onto others, as not everyone has the same schedule as | you. | eastbound wrote: | In France, the law says the employer must use an email | platform that disables communication during non-working | hours. | | Yes, it exists. Yes, no-one can notify the guy on duty | because no-one can send him emails. | TrickyRick wrote: | You've never worked in an org with more than one time zone, | have you? | diegoperini wrote: | Do not disturb is terrible if you are a part-time caregiver or | on pager duty. No phone OS gives enough control over its | settings and bad news often arrive from unknown numbers, i.e | the hospital, 3rd party robot call service, friend of a friend | etc. Speaking from experience. | mgfist wrote: | A brute force solution would be a second (or third) phone for | those situations | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | That seems excessive, because the only people who you give | the second number to would be the people setup to bypass | the dnd anyway. | vlovich123 wrote: | I have DND and the PagerDuty alerts are set to bypass it | through the app. There can be improvements made but expecting | your social graph to respect an assumed context has similar | problems (not to mention due to spam I think most people | screen/ignore calls from unknown numbers). I like iOS's | ability to share your DND state with your contacts but even | that has challenges (eg people turn it off for privacy | reasons real or perceived). | aaaaaaaaata wrote: | Why has the above (knowing how to properly use the devices | that make their lives go round) become so rare? | [deleted] | UncleEntity wrote: | I push the button that looks like an old school phone | handset and punch in a sequence of numbers corresponding | to another phone then talk to someone. | | Is there a more proper way to use a phone? | kuschku wrote: | I have mesages that can't be linked to contacts on vibration | during day (silent at night), messages from contacts on | vibration during day (during night only the second message | within of 15 minutes sends makes a noise), and phone calls | always on loud. | | That catches all unexpected emergencies without bothering me | too much due to emails, IRC messages, or a random text from a | friend. | a-dub wrote: | i'm old school but: | | 1) there's this amazing tool that allows you to send a longform | communication directly to one or many people where it will get | stored and when they're starting their workday they'll see it. | it's called e-mail. you should turn off notifications on your | phone for e-mail... if a message is urgent, they can call or | text. | | 2) you shouldn't obscure when you're working. creative people | often prefer to work late, you should be honest about this so | early morning expectations are relaxed. if you're typically a | morning person and up on a production issue you should not be | expected to be in first thing the next day after staying up | late to fix it. | | 3) all this delayed fake timestamp messaging just contributes | to a toxic culture of everybody appearing to be working all the | time. | s3p wrote: | Firstly, IMO, email is by no way amazing. It is useful and | essentially a standard way of communicating by now, but I | have never once thought of the communication protocol as | being amazing. | | Second, there is nothing toxic about scheduling a text. My | father is one of the people who never silences his phone, so | when he gets a text or call at night he always wakes up. He | gets annoyed if it's not urgent, so a scheduled text message | in the morning would make him much happier. Scheduling a text | message is all about convenience for the recipient of the | message and comes out of a desire to be _respectful_ of the | other person 's time. | UncleEntity wrote: | I agree with your father, if someone texts/calls during | normal sleeping hours it really should be an emergency | because if everyone mutes their phones and there's a real | emergency then nobody will be able to get in touch with | anybody. | | Other than drunk friends and booty calls someone had better | be in the hospital or dead if they wake me up in the middle | of the night. | pseudalopex wrote: | > if everyone mutes their phones and there's a real | emergency then nobody will be able to get in touch with | anybody | | You can tell Android and iOS to make noise when someone | calls a 2nd time. | UncleEntity wrote: | Yep, and the spammers know that too so they call twice in | a row. | | And I'm pretty sure you're only entitled to _one_ phone | call... | pseudalopex wrote: | > Yep, and the spammers know that too so they call twice | in a row. | | Didn't you just argue everyone shouldn't mute their | phones? | | > And I'm pretty sure you're only entitled to one phone | call... | | You're thinking of a plot device probably.[1] | | [1] https://www.betternoahlawyer.com/your-one-phone-call/ | kimburgess wrote: | Communication protocols extend through the human layer too. | As long as both ends agree on what that is, the medium that | the message uses to get from A to B is arbitrary. | | With your father, texts are synchronous comms, possibly | without requiring an explicit acknowledgement. This may be | different for different groups of people. Define what that | agreed protocol is and it removes the ambiguity. | a-dub wrote: | > It is useful and essentially a standard way of | communicating by now | | perfect. beautiful. AMAZING! | | the smtp crypto situation is a mess, sure, but work emails | usually all stay on the same machine or hosting provider | anyway. more importantly, it comes from an era before zomg | smartphone notifications now now now and as such has | respectful communications properties built-in. | | > Second, there is nothing toxic about scheduling a text. | My father is one of the people who never silences his | phone, so when he gets a text or call at night he always | wakes up. He gets annoyed if it's not urgent, so a | scheduled text message in the morning would make him much | happier. | | personal matters are just that and i was referring to work | stuff mostly.... buuuuut that said... | | you should try sending him an e-mail! even if you schedule | your text for when he's awake, you're still sending him a | demanding interrupt! old people love their e-mails they sit | in their big comfy chairs and read them at their leisure | with their favorite glasses on with their nice big lamps! | he probably will appreciate that even more! if it's urgent | and he hasn't responded, THEN you can send an interrupt by | giving him a call or sending a text. | | instead you're instructing robots to steal your dad's | attention at some predetermined time in the future while | you do something else... do you see the dystopic themes | here? | alexeldeib wrote: | > it comes from an era before zomg smartphone | notifications now now now and as such has respectful | communications properties built-in. | | Gmail on iOS certainly will try to notify you for | "important" messages. If anything, I think the failure of | email in combatting spam is the only thing saving us from | the notification-heavy defaults you mentioned. | | > instead you're instructing robots to steal your dad's | attention at some predetermined time in the future while | you do something else... do you see the dystopic themes | here? | | Not that different from setting a reminder to send the | text yourself...and you'd presumably pick a scheduled | send time when _you're also available_ to reply. But I do | agree, it's marginally more impersonal. | [deleted] | irrational wrote: | > when they're starting their workday they'll see it | | Well... I often don't check my email till after lunch or | later. This has never been a problem since anybody who needs | an answer to something in less than 24 hours uses slack or | text messaging. | AdamJacobMuller wrote: | > But I've thought about this a bit recently, and I don't think | I should have to worry about bothering someone at 3 AM. I don't | think it's unreasonable to expect other people to have do not | disturb on / notifications off whenever they don't want to be | disturbed. | | I'm very direct about this with new hires. | | "I'm awake and work weird hours. Please don't take a message | from me outside your normal hours to mean I want or need an | immediate response unless the message is directly talking about | a production outage in which case i'll be explicit about that. | If you're around and you want to spend a few hours debating the | merits of embedding a lua interpreter into a data processing | pipeline vs trying to figure out how to droplessly reload | golang code great, if not, we can pick it up the next time | we're both around. | | On the same note, please don't not message me because it's late | where you think I am at the moment and please don't not let me | know about something because 'it's normal US hours, he probably | already knows.' | | Please also don't take offense if I don't respond immediately, | despite appearances, I do sometimes actually sleep." | | Setting the actual expectations works great. Some people | respond simply by saying that they won't put slack on their | phone, or will turn notifications for slack off and I'm fine | with that (having their number to call for actual emergencies). | | I think the problem arises not from the direct actions here | (messaging someone at 3am) but by the implicit expectation of a | reply. I think some people don't realize what they're doing but | I think a lot do and they want to create that implicit must- | reply-24-7 nature. | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | I get telling people that you are comfortable being contacted | whenever. That's your choice/life. | | But if I was working for you I would not like this part: | | > unless the message is directly talking about a production | outage in which case i'll be explicit about that | | because that means I have to keep notifications on and triage | them even though the whole point is "I'm not going to respond | outside work hours when my notifications are off / dnd is | on." | jws wrote: | This is a frequent disconnect. | | It really depends on the scale of the business. In some | large ones, there is always a person working to handle | "must be fixed now" problems. If you are off shift, then it | is the person on shift's task. | | In smaller operations with 24 hour operation, and | infrequent "must be fixed now" problems, there will be | workers whose job includes being on call. Sometimes the on | call duty rotates, sometimes it does not. | | So if you are from a land of large companies, it may seem | insane for your employer to ask something of you outside | your shift. Likewise, when you are a little guy scrambling | to grow, getting out of bed once in a while and handling a | problem to preserve that growth is your best option. | | In the situation in this post, I would _hope_ that the | critical "get up and fix this" messages come through a | different system, or have a way to cut through a "do not | disturb" so the employees can mute the mundane messages. | | It sounds like you are in the first group. My company | didn't staff 24 hours, but used to pay people extra when | they were the "get up and handle this" person. The size of | the pay, and the frequency of the events was tuned so there | was always a willing pool of people queueing to be the | pager carrier. | AdamJacobMuller wrote: | > I have to keep notifications on and triage them | | Nope. Read the whole comment, i address that :) | | Some people said "fine, then I'm turning off notifications" | and I'm fine with that, if I have an alternate method of | contact for the (very rare) production outages. | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | Understood. The expectations of your job/team | (emergencies etc) are probably just different from what | I'm used to. Seems like a good system for your team so | I'm glad it works for you. | Xeoncross wrote: | Yeah, it's really weird to have to guess the settings other | people desire. | | That's why do not disturb on / notifications off is on each of | our phones. We control that. I don't expect other people to | figure out the right timezone and sleep patterns I have. | ian_lotinsky wrote: | Most of the time when I delay emails or Slack messages, it's | because I don't want others to respond until later because of | my own busyness or more important items to address today. | Scheduling let's me delay more back-and-forth but with the | luxury of queuing my latest message now. | axg11 wrote: | That's idealism whereas this hack deals with realism: many | people don't have their notifications setup perfectly and also | feel the pressure to respond immediately. | lesstyzing wrote: | Why's that the message sender's problem though? I can't help | if you pressure yourself even if I'm clear I'm putting none | on you. | noizejoy wrote: | Once upon a time, email was more generally considered to be | non-interruptive, while a phone call and later sms was | considered interruptive. | | Ober time, this distinction has blurred due to technology | changes and resulting cultural adjustments including | immediate email delivery, voicemail and advanced messaging | and notification systems. | | And that change over time is causing some disconnects | between expectations of good behaviour. | eastbound wrote: | *due to Samsung, who decided that every email deserved a | ringing notification. | | It's especially appalling when they played this trick on | my old parents, who receive a slew of emails every | morning at 5 or 6am. | prmoustache wrote: | Because if you are on duty for production issues you may | not be able to put your entire smartphone in do not disturb | yet you don't want to be woken up at 3 am because some | coworker send you something non critical. | | Having separate devices for personnal and professional | stuff helps. I can't speak about iOS, I used it way too | long ago but both Android and most messaging platforms do | not provide ways to have flexible do not disturb policies | depending on multiple parameters such as | sender/timeframe/app/format of message. It is usually a mix | of the global do not disturb function for the OS, the | global notification parameters per app and possibly some | mute options on a contact/channel basis but that is not | time range capable and only works on a blacklist instead of | whitelist model. | TrickyRick wrote: | On iOS the two most popular systems for on-call (OpsGenie | and Pager Duty) both bypass DND if configured correctly | so it's a non-issue. I imagine Android has something | similar. | TheNorthman wrote: | > I can't help if you pressure yourself even if I'm clear | I'm putting none on you. | | That's... exactly what this is about. Now you _can_ help | it. | ketzo wrote: | I would argue that, in most social contexts, "receiving a | message" does put some amount of pressure on a person. | | Unless you have a really explicit understanding with the | person you're texting, they're gonna assume you expect a | response, or just expect them to read the message. | | You gotta know how your actions will be received; "I can't | help you" really just isn't enough if you wanna be a kind | and thoughtful person, IMO. | TameAntelope wrote: | I disagree; a message sent on an async platform is _not_ | expected to be responded to immediately, it 's simply | meant to be removed from the sender's "to-do" list. | noizejoy wrote: | The distinction between sync vs async messaging isn't as | easy to figure out these days as it was when snail mail | vs phone call were the primary options. | TameAntelope wrote: | The negative consequences of making the wrong choice are | both extremely low and extremely loud, so I urge you to | just take a guess, with a strong bias for every | technology platform being async. | yellow_postit wrote: | That's how my thinking has come around as well and a benefit of | maintaining work vs. personal device separation. | | If I'm on a work computer/device/profile I don't mind seeing | work-related items. Even better if its clear when action is | needed. | | As many companies become more diverse in working times, | trusting individuals to manage it seems like one option while | the other is would be patterned off the French "Right to | disconnect" | noizejoy wrote: | Culture is a shifting beast. | | Being courteous means trying to think on behalf of the other | person. | | However, as we interact with ever increasing numbers of | individuals with an ever increasing variety of backgrounds | and personal circumstance, it's increasingly impossible to | think on behalf of everyone we interact with. | | And therefore it makes sense that we all need to design and | configure mechanisms, that allow us to interact while keeping | stress levels somewhat manageable. | rsync wrote: | I usually send sms from the Unix shell so a delayed message takes | the form of: sleep 7200 ; sms ... | | (Where 'sms' is a shell script that hits the twilio api with | curl) | | If I drop my phone in the river I can still send sms from my own | phone number. | | Not "blue" bubble though... | avel wrote: | You could use at(1) instead, so that you don't need to keep | that terminal process open. | MBCook wrote: | I understand why Apple is hesitant to add the feature. | | But this is a fantastic shortcut to get around the limitation. | Dracophoenix wrote: | I don't. Why is Apple hesitant exactly? | alphaomegacode wrote: | Me neither, can't see "the obvious" reason for them not | implementing this. | | Apple usually trots out "privacy" or "security" when people | find their software lacking in terms of usability or | convenience but I can't understand why this would be an issue | for them. | samatman wrote: | Why would they be hesitant? Complex user experience? | | I'll admit I've never scheduled a message for later, other than | on Twitter since I've lived in some awkward time zones relative | to the bulk of my mutuals. But I can't come up with a reason | why Apple wouldn't want to add it. | jpp wrote: | I can imagine a number of complications here. How should | delayed send work with respect to both end-to-end encryption | and with network connectivity loss? Ie I can see a possible | way to build this where the sending user's device queues and | sends it later, but what if that device is out of network | coverage area, or battery-dead, at the requested send time? | ...so then we could think about doing it at the server level, | but then to maintain end-to-end encryption, the message would | have to be pre-encrypted; how would we handle rekeying a | user? Ie if the delay send is for 24 hours from now, but one | of the recipient's keys get rotated (which afaik can happen | in a couple of reasonable conditions; but others here will | know more)... well, we end up with a solution that also can't | reliably deliver the message. | | One thing I really appreciate about Apple Messages is just | how well it works, and how little spam ever makes it in. I | think the reliability of Messages is almost taken for | granted... I wouldn't want to give that reliability promise | up for this sort of feature! | bobthepanda wrote: | Who said the queue has to be on the sender's device or the | server? | | Sender sends it encrypted with a flag to not display until | X time, phone receives it whenever, and then displays it at | X time because it's just been sitting there. | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | Well I think one benefit of a scheduled send is the | ability to cancel or edit after hitting the send button. | So I'm not sure if I'd appreciate setting it up like you | say here. | yieldcrv wrote: | Sounds like someone recently studied system design | interviews, did the compensation bump work out? | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | Maybe I am missing something obvious/important. Google | Messages delay send will not send the message if the phone | is off/disconnected. What's wrong with Apple Messages | setting up delayed messages just like that? You said | reliability. But Google Messages delay has worked 100% of | the time for me and I've never had a situation where the | phone was off when it needed so maybe I am the wrong person | to ask. | | Is there a way to have the timestamp part be unencrypted | and the message be encrypted or does that violate end to | end policy? | | Though I like being able to cancel/edit until the send | deadline so from my perspective it's best to keep on the | sender device as long as possible and send only at the last | possible second. | MBCook wrote: | But iMessage is synced between devices. So if I delay a | send on my iPhone and lose network, my other Apple | devices know enough they could still send it. | | Should they (I asked to send) or not ('sending' device | offline)? | jeroenhd wrote: | If it's E2EE, why not send the message with a timestamp | at which the server should approximately process the | message? If it's well encapsulated/encrypted, it | shouldn't matter that the message is on the server for a | while. | MBCook wrote: | What does the receiving user see? Do they know it was | scheduled? | | If not they may expect me to start responding when I may be | unavailable. | | What happens to read status (when on)? I haven't read your | last X messages but I did send one to you? That's off. | | Can it be canceled? | | How does this interact with the new function in iOS 16 | letting you edit and delete after send? | | Can I schedule send on my iPhone but edit before send on my | iPad? | | What if I schedule send and lose network. Then I edit on both | my iPhone and iPad to show different things but they're both | off network. Not they both come back. What gets sent? | | What if the 'wrong one' comes back first? | | Does it work with SMS? | | Lots of weird complications to think about. | samatman wrote: | Personally, I would solve all of these by pushing the | message up, like sending it, but with colors that make it | clear that it's suspended, and a clock icon, which shows | when it will send. | | Long press the message to get a context menu: edit, delete, | reschedule, send now. | | As for sync and all that, whatever algorithm they use for | Notes is fine with me. I would expect the message itself to | be living in iCloud until it's sent, so most of the | questions about losing network connectivity or not having | battery life wouldn't apply. So no, no SMS: support for SMS | in Messages is an afterthought and I would in fact prefer | two different apps, although I might be the only one who | feels that way. | jeroenhd wrote: | Telegram's implementation shows a little calendar icon | next to the text input when you've planned a message, | which takes you to a list of planned messages you can | interact with like any other message. This solves the | problem of your message appearing right in the middle of | already sent messages or your message constantly bubbling | down as a real-time conversation takes place. I think it | works quite well. | jeroenhd wrote: | Using Telegram as a reference: | | - In the notification: yes. In the chat view: no. I don't | know why it matters, though. If you expect an immediate | response, you should probably use a more asynchronous | communication method (many email platforms can hold | messages for you). That doesn't seem like a reason to not | make the feature available, though. | | - That's a possible state regardless, unless the client | must always have a full database of all received messages | before new messages come in; most messaging apps seem to | support a "fragmented" read state and I doubt iOS's | messenger doesn't. | | - Yes | | - I don't see the problem here. Replace the message in the | queue using an account+message identifier/cryptographic | signature/magical pixie dust. | | - Yes | | - If the message is sent by the server at the scheduled | time, this isn't a problem. If you rely on individual | devices (Google's implementation), you may end up sending a | duplicate. I doubt this'll happen that often in practice. | | - Depends on the implementation; the server will probably | keep the "correct" version to send. | | - Probably not? There are tons of features that don't work | with SMS though. I haven't used SMS for years, but Google's | Messages app has delayed messages and a web client, so this | seems like a solved enough problem for those still using | SMS. | | Several chat apps, including SMS apps, have this feature | already. E2EE adds a layer of complexity but even that can | be fixed with existing technology. | hackernewds wrote: | Spam | samatman wrote: | This one I'm not seeing. Spam is about volume, how does | this help a spammer spam more if it takes longer than just | sending a message, which presumably it would? | yieldcrv wrote: | forget work, This would be useful for texting someone you're | interested in that would be wary of someone that text at an odd | hour or "too soon", just send the thing you are thinking of at | the time but set a delay! | ideamotor wrote: | I find as I get older, I want to simplify. I know setting this up | would be easy but it's just one more thing to mess with that | isn't tackling a fundamental issue. The fundamental issue here is | why you want to send delayed messages not how. | green-salt wrote: | I feel like this is trying to dodge IM and email noise fatigue | and having that bleed into texts. I'm nocturnal when I have the | choice so I understand, but would definitely mute a coworker if | they regularly texted me on a schedule for when I wake up. | yardstick wrote: | > It's especially useful in situations where I have a work- | related thought at 3AM and don't want to risk waking up and | annoying my co-workers. | | Just send an email? | | If it doesn't require an immediate response, use email. | | Also if it's iPhone to iPhone you likely won't interrupt the | other user since they would/should have night mode on anyway. | prmoustache wrote: | We like it or not, spam, corporate and commercial harassment | made so that many people have dropped email for most intra team | communication a long time ago and barely check it or only once | a week. | blinded wrote: | Similar to other notifications, I feel its up to the recienver | to control their notification in a way that makes sense to | them. | hkpack wrote: | Some teams doesn't have dedicated on-call engineer, so | message as 3am may mean something may be urgent. At least it | would be difficult to resist looking at what is going on. | | E-mail is way to go in this situation. | | Also, sender will be unavailable to reply for additional | info, while appearing to be online. | macintux wrote: | I don't have access to corporate email on my phone, although | I'd probably use Slack instead of a text. | vimy wrote: | You can make a new shortcut that is triggered by a specific hour. | Not sure why this post says it can't be done. | | I used it last month to wish someone happy birthday. | thunfischbrot wrote: | > so I had come to depend on it in my daily workflow. It's | especially useful in situations where I have a work-related | thought at 3AM and don't want to risk waking up and annoying my | co-workers. | | At first glance this seems like a perfect match for e-mail | instead of iMessage or SMS. | | From least to most urgent: Postcard E-Mail Slack iMessage SMS | Call | fragmede wrote: | Not to mention, (some) email has a send later feature. | LeonenTheDK wrote: | Another common feature of a default app that Apple lacks is | having multiple timers on the iPhone clock app. Most often used | by my partner when cooking and there are a couple things going | that need different times. This is a feature in my Pixel and I | just can't understand what reason there is to not include it. | | That said though, this is a fantastic work around, I love seeing | clever uses of tools to make them do things their creators | (probably) didn't necessarily intend. | 14 wrote: | This is why I always loved jailbreaking my iPhones. Typically | there is an app out there somewhere that will do what you want | but it was always nice to go to cydia and find a tweak that | allowed stock apps and functions to do what they normally would | not be able to do. | MBCook wrote: | Why don't my timers sync? | | If I start something on my watch or HomePod why can't I check | in on it on my phone? | | Why do I need a set of independent timers for ever Apple device | I own? | usrn wrote: | Syncing clocks is surprisingly difficult. On top of that you | have to get the message to all the devices that there even is | a timer, this might be delivered after the timer expires. I | don't think you could do this in a way where people could | rely on it. You already have caldav which can sync your | agenda, I think that's probably the closest you'll get. | | There's a sibling comment that mentions HomeKit timers. I'd | bet those are living on some remote machine and you're only | able to check them but they behave very differently from | local timers. | MBCook wrote: | All the devices are already synced to an NTP server. I | don't need millisecond accuracy here. | robbiep wrote: | You can check a HomePod timer on your phone - it's in the | home app under whatever pod it is, down the bottom | activitypea wrote: | This makes me even more annoyed than if it just wasn't | possible | usrn wrote: | iOS lacks support for multiple instances of nearly everything. | It's the OS of "form over function." | yakubin wrote: | I would love that feature for cooking! It's such a no-brainer. | | Edit: it seems there exists an app for that[1]. Gonna try it | tomorrow. | | [1]: <https://apps.apple.com/us/app/easy-cooking- | timer/id492224774> | ezfe wrote: | The HomePod and Watch both support multiple timers, which makes | it more baffling | sgt wrote: | The teams did not communicate | tekchip wrote: | The clock app team probably had the thought to add it at | 3am but couldn't schedule an iMessage to remind their | teammates to implement it. | kmlx wrote: | > Another common feature of a default app that Apple lacks is | having multiple timers on the iPhone clock app. | | siri supports this. i mainly use it when cooking and need | multiple timers. | hgazx wrote: | It doesn't allow me to do this. If I ask to create a timer | and then ask to create another I'm asked if I want to replace | the previous one. | jeffbee wrote: | Not on iPhone. | null0pointer wrote: | When shortcuts were first released I immediately tried to | implement delayed messaging too. In the end I wasn't able to get | it working and gave up. Great job finding this workaround! | tumdum_ wrote: | Work though at 3am? Sounds like a really unhealthy relationship | with work. Not surprised author is from states. | a-dub wrote: | > Work though at 3am? Sounds like a really unhealthy | relationship with work. Not surprised author is from states. | | it's common for creative individual contributors to work late | and often those kinds of people do their best work late. i'd | argue that the way it can become unhealthy is when rigid early | work hours lead to sleep deprivation which can damage | performance, well-being and overall stability. | stuartd wrote: | Some people (like me) are wide awake at 3AM and have work | thoughts then. Others are asleep - we're all different. I tend | to use email drafts or email myself the text with a note to | forward it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-04 23:00 UTC)