[HN Gopher] Only 6.8% of adults have optimal cardiometabolic health ___________________________________________________________________ Only 6.8% of adults have optimal cardiometabolic health Author : geox Score : 36 points Date : 2022-07-04 20:06 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.jacc.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.jacc.org) | sacrosancty wrote: | Not having seen the full paper, surely the range of values that | belong to "optimal" is arbitrary and if measurement error or | understanding were improved, the optimal range would shrink, | excluding even more people. So doesn't that make the percentage | meaningless? | lisper wrote: | Exactly right. The claim is absurd on its face because of its | very form. | dpeck wrote: | What's the metric to define that? | | This is just the abstract to anyone who doesn't have access to | the journal. | PeterWhittaker wrote: | From the Method section, just a few paras in (I just clicked on | the link provided, I do not subscribe to any journals): We | assessed proportions of adults with optimal cardiometabolic | health, based on adiposity, blood glucose, blood lipids, blood | pressure, and clinical CVD; and optimal, intermediate, and poor | levels of each component among 55,081 U.S. adults in the | National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. | mdorazio wrote: | That doesn't actually explain anything, though. What is | "optimal" in each of those categories and why is that level | optimal as opposed to any other one? | dubswithus wrote: | I'm one of the 6.8%. Very low LDL. Taking questions. | | Bet let's get this out of the way first: I eat a lot of | carbohydrates. | cableshaft wrote: | What's your exercise regimen look like? | asdfqwertzxcv wrote: | Whole Food Plant Based and regular exercise, right? | PainfullyNormal wrote: | How about seed oils? | xwdv wrote: | Do NOT consume seed oils. Go in your pantry and throw away | anything that lists some kind of seed oil as an ingredient. | austinjp wrote: | Why? * | | * By which I mean with references. And yes, big farma, etc | etc, but really, decent studies please. | MattGaiser wrote: | Are seed oils some new health trend? I keep seeing people | mention them in health discussions. | hirundo wrote: | There's a lot of evidence that PUFAs are obesogenic and | diabetogenic. Their consumption increase broadly tracks the | epidemics of both. E.g. | | https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Soybean-Oil-Is-More- | Ob... | | If the effect is real it takes place over decades, | gradually damaging mitochondria, making it difficult to | cover with RCTs. | Entinel wrote: | "A lot" is a stretch. There is some evidence in mice and | a few hypothesis but I certaintly wouldn't say "a lot." | The exception to this I would say is soybean oil. There | is a decent amount of research pointing in direction that | soybean oil isn't great. | rafaelero wrote: | Added oil should be kept at minimum. It doesn't matter | the source. But of course this is not the main reason for | the obesity epidemic; people just like to find easy | culprits instead of looking at the culture around food in | the US. | SamPatt wrote: | I believe the case against seed oils isn't about them | causing obesity, but heart disease. | PainfullyNormal wrote: | The opposite. https://fireinabottle.net/ | TimedToasts wrote: | Do you know your FFMI? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-04 23:00 UTC)