[HN Gopher] Turkey Discovers 694M Mt of Rare Earth Element Reserves ___________________________________________________________________ Turkey Discovers 694M Mt of Rare Earth Element Reserves Author : ksec Score : 77 points Date : 2022-07-05 19:31 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (news.metal.com) (TXT) w3m dump (news.metal.com) | exabrial wrote: | Turkey is in EU/NATO, but I question the relationship given | Erdogan. My naive assessment is he is now "elected" for life by | force. No idea if my perception is correct, but given their | strategic geographical importance and this as well, It'd be a | damn shame if democracy there disappeared. | baybal2 wrote: | aiilns wrote: | Turkey is in NATO, not in the EU. I believe elections are to | happen next year, although democracy in Turkey is probably not | going to get better for it. | mda wrote: | Why not? | ShivShankaran wrote: | nurettin wrote: | I wonder if today's metal future prices crashed for this reason. | mtoner23 wrote: | no | anonu wrote: | Strange article. Economy in the dump. 75% inflation rate | rendering everyone's money useless. Great time to "discover" a | massive stockpile of hard assets. | muzani wrote: | "drilling work started in 2011" | greggsy wrote: | Take any 'motherlode discovery' announcements with a grain of | salt - whether it's gold, rare earth or diamonds. | | They're almost certainly exaggerated, and are often announced | to satisfy investors with a healthy - temporary - uptick in | stock price. | exabrial wrote: | Looking at some of the concentrations for neodymium and | praseodymium... why _isn't_ magnet recycling more of thing? | Certainly extracting those elements from waste is cheaper than | raw ore. | Victerius wrote: | I have a bunch of old (5-15 yrs old) HDD hard drives in a | closet. Would that help? I don't know what to do with them. | cronix wrote: | I took mine out and use them as refrigerator magnets. They | are awesomely strong. No more cheap magnets sliding down the | refrigerator not holding weight. | | Edit: Daughter really liked using the shiny platters in art | projects (after degaussing with the RE magnets). I've reused | some of the dc motors in other projects (arduino type stuff). | All that's left is the small circuit board, read/write head | and metal body to recycle. | hinkley wrote: | I have a couple too, but I broke one by letting it leave my | hand too far from the surface. | rlpb wrote: | We've put away all our awesomely strong fridge magnets | while we bring up a child. It's not worth the risk of him | swallowing them. I don't trust small magnets to stay inside | larger plastic frames, either. | hinkley wrote: | How do you collect enough rare earth magnets to be worth | recycling them? I don't mean where do you find that many | magnets, I mean how do you store, transport and then process | them. You'd have to demagnetize them first, right? | | It doesn't seem like the temperature requirements are outside | of something one could do with pretty low end hardware, but the | problem is that a lot of the equipment you might have to say do | this in your garage would be ferrous, which is problematic. | Maybe a recycling center wouldn't have that problem? | [deleted] | yread wrote: | million mt? Is that million megatons? And which rare earth | elements are they? | rajandatta wrote: | Wouldn't it be 694 million metric tonnes? I million megatons is | a hell of a lot. | dmitrygr wrote: | 1 million megatons is ~ 46.55 metric tons | | A megaton is 4.184 * 10^15 J, which is equivalent to 46.55 | grams | [deleted] | moralestapia wrote: | LOL, 46 tons would hardly ever be news, that's about the | output of a medium-sized mine _per minute_. | ptk wrote: | That's astonishing. I clearly don't have any type of | intuition for the amount of earth these mines are | extracting, because the number you're putting out there | seems comical. | moralestapia wrote: | Indeed. Check this -> | https://www.grida.no/resources/11419 | | The volumes involved are huge! | gpcr1949 wrote: | You can't convert mass to energy like that in this context. | A megaton just means a million tons (of TNT in an energy | context). You can say: (the energy released when | detonating) a megaton of TNT is equivalent to 46.55 g of | pure mass to energy conversion (E = mc**2 type), but that | would be irrelevant in this context because no one is | planning converting this mass to energy, nor would it be | possible. | dmitrygr wrote: | tasuki wrote: | Probably metric tonnes, but it's weird to use "Mt" to mean | metric tonne rather than megatonne. The symbol for metric | tonne is "t" [0]. It would certainly be less ambiguous to | just spell it out. | | [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonne | [deleted] | philipkglass wrote: | See pages 14 and 15 of this presentation: | https://mric.jogmec.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/seminar... | | It's mostly light rare earth elements. Over half of it is | cerium and most of the rest is lanthanum. Most of the economic | value is in the elements that are _not_ cerium or lanthanum. It | appears to have about the same proportion of neodymium and | praseodymium (valuable light rare earth elements used in | magnets) as the Mountain Pass, California mine, plus more | terbium (more expensive heavy rare earth element also useful in | magnets) than Mountain Pass. | sbierwagen wrote: | Also on that slide: "has average 3.14% grade". I assume that | doesn't mean the rock consists of 3.14% of the target | element, but is 3.14% of whatever ore they're targeting, | right? | loufe wrote: | You're right, there's no way they would not tout the "15% | grade" of the actual ore, if by some miracle there was | 3.14% grade the entirety of their staked land. | | Ore is by definition the "economically | feasible/interesting" subsection of the rock covered by the | claim. | yread wrote: | Awesome, thanks this clears it up. And are these reserves | measured, inferred or indicated? Is there a PFS? | jwilk wrote: | No no no, mt = millitonne = kg. | dificilis wrote: | It reminds me of a recent HN story telling us not to trust any | number you see in a news story. | Barrera wrote: | The article is vague about the identities of the elements. They | tend to occur together, but some are way more valuable than | others. Cerium, for example, is considered a "rare earth" but is | not that rare at all: | | > Cerium is the most abundant of all the lanthanides, making up | 66 ppm of the Earth's crust; this value is just behind that of | copper (68 ppm), and cerium is even more abundant than common | metals such as lead (13 ppm) and tin (2.1 ppm). Thus, despite its | position as one of the so-called rare-earth metals, cerium is | actually not rare at all. ... | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerium | divbzero wrote: | A sibling comment [1] cited additional details that the find is | indeed mostly cerium, followed by lanthanum which also has | limited economic value. | | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31993668 | vanattab wrote: | Honest question. What is the distribution throughout the crust | though? If something that is 66 ppm but near uniformily | distributed could be much harder to extract then something that | is 2.2 ppm but occurs I distinct viens. | oportunityastro wrote: | It is nothing to do with anything. Copper is relatively | abundant by this measure, but almost everyone who I know who | has a view on copper see the future supply situation as | terrible. There is politics, financial cycles, actual site | economics...I mean the US right now is the perfect example of | this, centuries of discovered natural gas reserves that is | proven economic to take out of the ground, and natural gas is | skyrocketing...it isn't that simple. | philipkglass wrote: | That's exactly what makes most of the rare earth elements | "rare": they are common in the Earth's crust but rarely | concentrated into easily mined deposits. Neodymium and | praseodymium are also more common than tin but significantly | more costly because they don't form ore bodies like tin does | under geochemical influences. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth. | .. | [deleted] | hrkucuk wrote: | God damn. If nothing this will be used to make ppl force vote for | Erdogan in 2023... Just another propoganda tool to vote him :( | And I was naively keeping up my hopes for this Turkey's 100th | birthday elections, but it seems like he will follow a Nazarbayev | model for himself. I can only hope him to get pulled into his | bubble where he leaves important decisions to liable, honest | people. But unless his "magistrates" come down it does not seem | possible. | bayesian_horse wrote: | I don't quite see how Erdogan would be any better at exploiting | that resource than anybody else. Worse actually, because he'll | have trouble attracting foreign investments... | asciimike wrote: | In case you're coming to this thread asking yourself why there | are a bunch of comments like this, I really like | https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/book-review-the-new-su... | as an overview of "how we got here in the first place." | arcticbull wrote: | Despite their name, rare earth elements aren't rare at all - in | fact, they're all over the place. They're in the US, Canada, | Brazil, Australia, Vietnam, China, India, Russia - and of course | Turkey. [1] | | Most of the refining takes place in China, though, because only | China is willing to pay the toxic environmental cost associated | with actually doing so. This is what that process looks like. [2] | | It's good to diversify the supply to be sure, but the question | is, will Turkey be willing to pay the environmental cost of | refining? Or will China continue to take that on. We're not short | of input ore, so if not, I suspect the market will continue to | look much like it does in spite of this discovery. | | [1] https://www.visualcapitalist.com/rare-earth-elements- | where-i... | | [2] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150402-the-worst- | place-... | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | Making them a little less rare. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-05 23:00 UTC)