[HN Gopher] Show HN: Interactive course about "everyday" data sc... ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: Interactive course about "everyday" data science Last year, I wrote the book Everyday Data Science. It was #1 on HN! [1] This year, I've been working with Jim Fisher on a new kind of interactive course. It's like a choose-your-own-adventure, except you'll learn Thompson sampling, differential equations, and Bayesian-optimal pricing. After several months, the first two chapters are ready! Every word, button, and sound has been painstakingly crafted. Try out the first chapter to see what we mean! [2] The course will be $99, but it's $29 today, as a thanks for helping us build the next 8 chapters! Let us know what you think :-) - Andrew Carr [3] [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26253281 [2]: https://tigyog.app/d/L:X07z8laLyz/r/when-life-gives-you-lemo... [3]: https://twitter.com/andrew_n_carr Author : andrewnc Score : 131 points Date : 2022-07-16 14:32 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (tigyog.app) (TXT) w3m dump (tigyog.app) | pella wrote: | meta question: | | Expecting this post is an "A/B Testing" | | Q: Which group am I actually in now? Is this group "A" or "B" ? | | :-) | andrewnc wrote: | Ha!! Great question, so this is our fourth round of message | testing. We didn't want to A/B directly on HN cause that feels | kinda disingenuous, but we've definitely been crunching | conversion rates and such. | jamesfisher wrote: | Haha!! Excellent question. So this is our fourth round of | testing messages. We didn't want to A/B on HN cause that kinda | feels disingenuous! But we've definitely been crunching things | like conversion rates. | | (Edit: this comment is a stupid meta-meta-joke, please ignore | :-) | philosopher1234 wrote: | Was "Excellent" or "Great" group A? | | Exit: oh... that was the joke. I thought I was clever | jamesfisher wrote: | Yes, one of those was group A | jamesfisher wrote: | Everyday Data Science is the first course on TigYog [1], a | platform I'm building. Most courses are video-based, but TigYog | courses are more like books. The only addition is multiple-choice | buttons with responses. This lets you simulate the tight feedback | loop you'd have with a private tutor. | | Andrew's writing shows off what you can make with this medium. | It's a bit like blogging. Try it out and let me know how it goes! | (Currently it's a WYSIWYG editor, though I'm also working on a | Markdown+git interface. Let me know if you're interested.) | | - Jim Fisher [2] | | P.S.: Thanks to one user reporting an Apple Pay UI glitch. I'm on | it! In the meantime, ordinary Stripe card payment should work. | | [1]: https://tigyog.app/ [2]: https://jameshfisher.com/ | lagrange77 wrote: | > [1]: https://tigyog.app/ [2]: https://jameshfisher.com/ | | I like your style! | MathYouF wrote: | I've tended to observe an inverse correlation between how | much/early in their pitch someone discusses their credentials | when selling a product (or their own labor) rather than purely | focusing on the merits of the product (or technical approach to | problems their labor may be assisting with) and the actual | revealed quality of that thing later. | | Maybe someone listing their credentials also just rubs me the | wrong way, as it feels like an attempt by them to subvert | meritocracy by trying to gain compound interest on good fortune | by improving social perception, when supposedly having those | credentials in the first place ought to have already given them a | sufficient leg up in terms of real ability (that's why one | mentions the credential after all, to imply it imparted on them | or signals of them real ability, so why not just show that | directly?). | | Anyway, the sleezy feeling the high pressure sales technique gave | also contributed to a general disinterest in a product I'd | otherwise be very receptive to. | | I'd enjoy hearing some concrete discussion of what unique vision | you have for improving the intuition of people trying to do data | science, and how this helps humanity, and your journey beyond A/B | testing marketing techniques. | | Aside: Since people coming to this thread are likely interested | in building unconventional ML intuition, and it is a topic dear | to me, I thought I'd share some resources. | | https://distill.pub/ | | https://colah.github.io/ | | WandB's Entire Math for ML Series: https://youtu.be/uZeDTwWcnuY | | Visual Intuition for NLP: http://jalammar.github.io/ | [deleted] | yessirwhatever wrote: | Your comment comes off bitter. You could just provide | additional links for those interested, and/or not read/buy the | course if you're not interested. Whatever is upsetting you is | not this. | MathYouF wrote: | I am indeed bitter (def: anger and disappointment at being | treated unfairly; resentment) about people using their | credentials rather than real merits of their work to attempt | to get a leg up when advertising their work. I covered my | dissatisfaction about that in my post. | | Distill.pub for example, despite being written by people who | worked at OpenAI and (also funded by) Google Brain, makes | nearly no mention of either. They've managed to successfully | accomplish their goal (creating resources to help people | improve their intuition about machine learning) without | resorting to those tactics. | pvg wrote: | _I covered my dissatisfaction about that in my post._ | | A Show HN is not really the place to vent that | dissatisfaction, though, at least not in that form. Take a | look at: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html | [deleted] | MathYouF wrote: | I think the popularity of my post suggests it better | represents the general sentiment of people who viewed the | page than not, but I do accept the tone reflects my | negative feelings towards the perceived | credentialsim:substance ratio more than it does an | impartial review of the content. Genuinely, feel free to | remove the entirely of my thread if you think it is | unproductive, I'm unable to edit it. | pvg wrote: | _I think the popularity of my post suggests_ | | People upvote highly emotive stuff all the time even if | it's at odds with HN's guidelines so whatever it | suggests, it doesn't suggest the place on HN where people | showcase their work is also the place for harangues. | People like harangues! It's just not the subforum for | them. | yessirwhatever wrote: | https://www.harleytherapy.co.uk/counselling/12-steps-to- | over... | [deleted] | andrewnc wrote: | Thank you for the candid feedback! It's definitely appreciated | and we'll take note | wittycardio wrote: | Uh credentials are good actually. The point of credentials is | that they allow me to trust someone without being an expert | myself. Of course if you are already an expert then you can | look beyond credentials to determine whether someone knows what | they're doing or not | jamesfisher wrote: | Thanks for the feedback! Did you mean the "I've worked at | Google Brain and OpenAI" in the second para? | | Also, yeah, Distill is _amazing_! Every post is a work of art. | Learned so much from it. | MathYouF wrote: | You can find the number of times each is mentioned (3) by | using a page search (ctrl+f). | boredemployee wrote: | Not sure what's your intent with all that "pseudo constructive | criticism" tone. And also, what's the point of sharing links | that are completely out of the purpose of the post? | MathYouF wrote: | boredemployee wrote: | Since you have such amount of free time, what about taking | advantage of that and make a real contribution and proper | feedback to this post. | MathYouF wrote: | I invited more positive and productive discussion on the | advertised topic: | | >"I'd enjoy hearing some concrete discussion of _what | unique vision you have for improving the intuition of | people trying to do data science_ , and how this helps | humanity, and your journey beyond A/B testing marketing | techniques. | | So far i've not received it from any replies (including | yours) and haven't seen it happen in any other comment | threads so far (including ones which could be made by | yourself). | | The lack of thoughtful discussion makes me believe this | post is meant to be just a marketing/sales pitch | (something I covered as a potential issue in my comment) | rather than a post for having deep, thoughtful, expansive | discussions on this topic. | | Like I said, I think you are perhaps the one who isn't in | sync with what kind of conversations are valued. | boredemployee wrote: | whatever you say my man | Uyuxo wrote: | heyhihello wrote: | I actually bought your book on Amazon and the book I received was | insanely disappointing. Full of typo's, super wonky formatting, | super short in depth and content, and the paper book was the | lowest quality of any I've ever received from Amazon. | | I didn't leave a review because There weren't many and I didn't | want to sour your sales with a 1-star, but I now kind of regret | that. | | The course looks cool, but it honestly just feels like a | monetizing attempt on something that really didn't deserve much | money to begin with. | andrewnc wrote: | Thanks for the feedback, I was hoping the course would be | something of a redemption. | | I self published the book to prove I could do something like | that. It got much more traction than I had planned and, in | hindsight, I wish I had paid for editing and formatting as a | minimum. | | As for the quality of the paperback, that was unfortunately out | of my control as I used Amazon's print on demand services. | Definitely a painful lesson for me. | | In any case, I appreciate this comment and others here. I'm | definitely working towards much higher substance with increased | polish. :) | jamesfisher wrote: | Hi! I wonder whether we could win you back with the course? | We've reworked so much of the content, I hope you'd find those | problems are gone! (Although the course is not on higher | quality paper) | in_cahoots wrote: | Considering the OP's complaint pointed to a lack of effort | and polish, this response doesn't really build trust in the | product. | Sebguer wrote: | No real opinion but fwiw | | >(Although the course is not on higher quality paper) | | Is a joke, because this course isn't a book at all. | heyhihello wrote: | To be honest I'm just bot willing to spend money on another | product of yours. | | This especially if it's a rehash of the same material (which | maybe you missed in my previous comment, but I didn't find to | be high-quality). | yessirwhatever wrote: | Interesting course. I'm not sure if you're affiliated with | tigyog.app owners or not, but 20% commission on paid courses is | too much. The platform looks neat and interesting, but I wouldn't | pay 20% of whatever I'm charging for a course to be able to use a | platform that self describes as a "blog with buttons". | fuzzythinker wrote: | I feel the same way. I believe 20% is very reasonable if it | drives traffic. So it's a chicken and egg problem. Right now, | due to it not having much courses there, the value isn't there. | | Side note on nav UX. I expect a right click on logo to be able | to open up the tigyog landing page, not save image dialog. | jamesfisher wrote: | Hi! I'm the solo developer of TigYog.app. I've been working | with Andrew to build out the course. What percentage would you | consider appropriate? It's set at 20% essentially because I | have rent and bills to pay :-) | yessirwhatever wrote: | I get that, and I wish you the best with it. It's definitely | interesting like I said. I'm not sure what financial model | would make it seem less intimidating, but I'd imagine as a | indie course-maker-on-the-side it'd be too expensive. Maybe a | different pricing scheme for corporations. | pcthrowaway wrote: | (not the person you're responding to) If you're offering | free, perpetual hosting, I think it's worth 20% of sales for | the creator (who doesn't know if they're even going to sell | much, or if the material will become outdated and stop | selling in a few years) | | I wondered how the creator of this course could guarantee the | course would be available forever, and what a headache it | must be to continue to maintain the hosting/content if sales | taper off. Outsourcing that job to a service which is hosting | _many_ such courses (and with new ones continually added) | makes a lot more sense here, and of course you have bills to | pay too. That 20% commission isn 't just covering the cost of | time you put into the course builder and hosting _now_ , it | covers hosting in perpetuity. | civilized wrote: | This is not intended as a criticism and, as an experienced data | scientist, I'm probably not the target audience anyway. But | just... how this hits me. There is a LOT of visual "decoration" | and sales-y, pitchy stuff here that makes my eyes/brain glaze | over from too much emotional stimulation. Maybe it has the | opposite effect for others. | jamesfisher wrote: | Hi! What are the main things you'd remove? E.g. maybe we've | gone too heavy with the illustrations, or sounds? | civilized wrote: | ...everything from the emojis on up? I think it's just not my | vibe. But I'm sure you've done it this way because it works | for a lot of other people. | isoprophlex wrote: | It sure as hell doesn't work on me. The kind of glib emoji- | packed sales-slash-emotional priming spiel totally rubs me | the wrong way. | | Everything here screams "we're sales people first, content | people second" and that's not worth my time. I'll choose | quiet confidence over showmanship. | swyx wrote: | no, your feeling is valid, you speak for the rest of us who | are so turned off we dont even bother to tell him | andrewnc wrote: | I've been a long time fan of your content! Thanks all for | these criticisms, we'll definitely take them to heart. | bakuninsbart wrote: | First chapter was quite fun. I actually would have bought the | course, but do not own a credit card. This is quite common | outside of the US, if you could add PayPal it would be | substantially more accessible. | okasaki wrote: | When places say "credit card", they really mean credit card or | debit card. Either works. | Tarq0n wrote: | No, debit cards in most of the world do not function for | remote transactions, even if they have a Mastercard or visa | logo. My bank's cards for instance are Mastercard's "Maestro" | product which is in-person and debit only, and has | alternative infrastructure for online payments. | jamesfisher wrote: | Thanks! :-) That's a great point, I'll look at adding PayPal. | (In the meantime, anyone in this situation: send me an email | and I'll can sort something out for you! - | jameshfisher@gmail.com) | getup8 wrote: ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-16 23:00 UTC)