[HN Gopher] Why rails buckle in Britain
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why rails buckle in Britain
        
       Author : scrlk
       Score  : 188 points
       Date   : 2022-07-16 15:04 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.networkrail.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.networkrail.co.uk)
        
       | zabzonk wrote:
       | I don't see how this really explains anything. I have never
       | understood how continuously-welded rails work compared with the
       | old-style track using short rails and fishplates joining them,
       | and this link doesnt help (for me at least).
        
         | adrian_b wrote:
         | It seems that the answer to your question is that the
         | continuously-welded rails work only within a relatively narrow
         | temperature range.
         | 
         | As mentioned at this link, the continuously-welded rails are
         | made to be stress free at a specified temperature, for example
         | 27 degrees Celsius in UK.
         | 
         | At lower temperatures the rails contract, which does not have
         | bad consequences unless the temperature becomes so low that the
         | rails will crack, because their strength has been exceeded by
         | the contraction stress. At very low temperatures the trains may
         | need to reduce their speed, so that the rails will not crack
         | due to the additional stresses caused by a passing train.
         | 
         | At higher temperatures, the rails dilate, and when the
         | temperature is high enough they will buckle. Due to that, the
         | trains may need to reduce the speed, or even stop and wait for
         | the rails to become colder.
         | 
         | At least a part of the rails from Germany have also been
         | updated with continuously-welded rails.
         | 
         | In one of my trips, it was a hot summer day and because of the
         | rail buckling all the trains had huge delays. Even if I should
         | have arrived at the Frankfurt airport about 3 hours before my
         | flight, due to the train delays caused by the hot weather, I
         | have arrived so late that I have lost the flight.
        
         | konschubert wrote:
         | Steel is a bit like rubber if your holding it with enough
         | force...
        
         | dazc wrote:
         | Considering this is Network Rail, I agree, the opportunity to
         | answer a lot of obvious questions has been seriously
         | overlooked.
        
         | scrlk wrote:
         | I found this article and associated video, along with the
         | Wikipedia article to be useful for filling in the gaps from the
         | article:
         | 
         | https://broadwayextensionblog.blogspot.com/2017/03/stressing...
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8EZ6pEAyLc
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_stressing
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | http://vinchad.blogspot.com/2014/06/ever-wondered-why-contin...
         | 
         | > Its laid it's in tension by hydraulically stretching it
         | before cutting to length and welding to the previous length.
         | Sufficient tension is applied to achieve a 'Stress Free
         | Temperature' (SFT) of 27 degrees C (i.e to relieve the tension
         | by expansion the rail would need to be heated by the sun to
         | 27C, whereupon it would neither be in tension or compression).
         | 
         | Apparently they lay it "hot" and so normally when it is cooler
         | than that it is actually "pulling" on itself trying to shrink,
         | and when it gets hotter than that it begins to compress.
         | 
         | If it can't compress it buckles, if it can't shrink then the
         | tension grows, but steel has incredible tensile strength.
        
           | ssl232 wrote:
           | I wonder if you can combine rail sections with different
           | zero-stress temperatures to cancel out across a wider range?
        
             | Gare wrote:
             | The tension is between each pair of sleepers (60 cm
             | distance), how would that work?
        
           | robocat wrote:
           | Here's a link showing the tensioning process using a petrol
           | powered hydraulic cylinder: https://broadwayextensionblog.blo
           | gspot.com/2017/03/stressing...
        
         | gattilorenz wrote:
         | It mentions the pre-stressing, but a better explanation is at
         | https://worldwiderails.com/how-do-railroads-deal-with-therma...
         | 
         | It also explains some of the maintenance procedures.
        
           | robocat wrote:
           | This article shows mechanical tensioning using a hydraulic
           | cylinder: https://broadwayextensionblog.blogspot.com/2017/03/
           | stressing... although it is clearly a straight section. Do
           | curved sections of rail just expand and contract?
           | 
           | The parent link says "Railroads deal with thermal expansion
           | by heating the rail prior to installation".
           | 
           | reddit/etmidust wrote "I was a manager of track maintenance
           | for a US railroad for a while. When they lay new rail, part
           | of the process is a 'heater car'[1]. This machine rides the
           | rail and is basically a multi headed blow torch to heat the
           | new rail to the 'rail neutral temperature'(SFT). At this
           | point the rail is not yet spiked down to the ties so that it
           | has a chance to grow and expand. After the heater car some
           | other rail cars called spikers follow to spike the new rail
           | down. That is how they 'pre-stress' the rail. I am skipping
           | some steps, but that is the gist of it."
           | 
           | [1] https://imgur.io/tvCy9C2
        
         | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_stressing
        
         | smcl wrote:
         | Pasting a couple of @GarethDennis tweets which answer this:
         | 
         | It is worth pointing out that jointed rather than welded track
         | WILL NOT solve the buckling problem.
         | 
         | In fact, jointed track is at a MUCH HIGHER risk of buckling in
         | heat than welded rails as gaps close and there are 160+ joints
         | PER MILE to maintain...
         | 
         | ...plus jointed track is generally lighter, weaker and thus at
         | higher risk of buckling (most GB buckles are in jointed, not
         | welded track).
         | 
         | Bolted joints also have a nasty habit of disintegrating under
         | traffic and derailing trains (hence use of welded track to
         | start with)
        
           | adrian_b wrote:
           | Your arguments make sense, so it appears that continuously-
           | welded rails should be better than the traditional jointed
           | rails.
           | 
           | Nevertheless, when I was young I traveled frequently by
           | train. During some decades, I have never seen problems caused
           | to the train traffic by too high temperatures, on traditional
           | jointed rails.
           | 
           | On the other hand, in the last few years, whenever I happened
           | to travel by train through Germany on continuously-welded
           | rails and the weather was hot, there were train delays due to
           | the rails.
           | 
           | So it seems that there is some disconnection between theory
           | and practice. Maybe the new continuously-welded rails have
           | been designed based on ancient recorded temperature ranges
           | that are no longer valid due to climate changes, as already
           | suggested in the parent article, but in any case something is
           | wrong with the design of modern rails.
           | 
           | In the parent article it is mentioned that changing the
           | stress-free temperature to a higher value is not good enough,
           | because the strength of the rails could be exceeded during
           | cold winters. So it is likely that the rails would have to
           | also be thicker, increasing their cost.
        
             | mook wrote:
             | I don't know anything about German weather, but according
             | to a random article on Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.or
             | g/wiki/List_of_extreme_temperatures... says 9 of 16 extreme
             | maximums are within the last year (with one about a month
             | over).
        
           | vladvasiliu wrote:
           | > In fact, jointed track is at a MUCH HIGHER risk of buckling
           | in heat than welded rails as gaps close and there are 160+
           | joints PER MILE to maintain...
           | 
           | Why? Don't the gaps give the track some amount of play which
           | would lower the pressure and therefore the risk of buckling?
        
             | mannykannot wrote:
             | I don't have a reliable source, but I recall hearing that
             | expansion gaps require the rails to have some freedom to
             | slide back-and-forth, as the expansion and contraction
             | occurs over the whole length. The rails are not guaranteed
             | to go back to where they started when they cool down, so
             | gaps can close up (while correspondingly widening elsewhere
             | to compensate), and if you have too many closed gaps in a
             | row, the rails can jam.
        
               | jaclaz wrote:
               | I believe you were misinformed.
               | 
               | The rails have not a real freedom to slide, they have two
               | different forms of resistance, the one provided by the
               | ties and the one provided by the junction, there is only
               | a given temperature range where they can slide.
               | 
               | The rail goes into a cycle, you need some 3-4 Cdeg to win
               | the resistance of the joint (in this part the rail is
               | compressed by some 6000 kg of resistance) and some 6-7
               | degrees more to win the resistance of the ties (some
               | 10-12000 kg more of compression), then it becomes "free
               | sliding" until the gap in the joint closes, this needs
               | 12-13 Cdeg more and the rail is again compressed by the
               | ends.
               | 
               | When the temperatures lowers, the same cycle is reversed,
               | the rail first contracts until the gap starts to appear
               | and widens, then you have again a range where it is free
               | sliding, then the two resistances come into play again,
               | when the temperature lowers further the excursion is
               | limited by the joints (usually they allow 14 mm travel)
               | and the rail is subject to traction (as opposed to
               | compression).
               | 
               | The only point that never moves is the tie at the center
               | of the rail length, you have to imagine a spring that you
               | try to expand by pulling the two sides, it will return to
               | its original shape, all forces are relative to the
               | center, so there is not any reason why the rail should
               | not come back to its original position.
               | 
               | Check this:
               | 
               | https://pwayblog.com/2017/03/06/jointed-track-response-
               | to-ra...
               | 
               | In practice - strangely enough - rails behave very
               | similar to the theory.
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | The center of each section of rail could be bolted to the
               | ties with non-sliding holes.
        
             | makomk wrote:
             | The gaps do give some amount of play. The trouble is that
             | once the temperature exceeds the design maximum the gaps
             | close up completely and all that expansion force is
             | directed into hard metal-on-metal contact, at which point
             | something has to give. Jointed rail tracks are not designed
             | to handle those forces without buckling because the whole
             | point of having the joints is so that they don't have to.
        
         | webmobdev wrote:
         | How do engineers plan for thermal expansion when laying
         | traintracks in deserts where the daytime and nighttime
         | temperatures are vastly different? -
         | https://old.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/8yxd21/how_do_e...
        
       | Linda703 wrote:
        
       | lordnacho wrote:
       | I wonder if it's the same buckling we mean when we're studying
       | structural engineering:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckling
       | 
       | The interesting thing here is that when something buckles, it's
       | not the material failing like when you crush a cake. It can
       | buckle well before you reach the force needed to break the steel
       | under compression.
        
         | philo23 wrote:
         | Definitely the same kind of buckling. Here's an example from a
         | couple of years ago in the news https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-
         | england-cumbria-44658254
         | 
         | Check Google images for some more extreme examples.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | Interesting - that looks like wooden sleepers too.
        
       | bambax wrote:
       | > _More than three-quarters of track on the network today is
       | modern on concrete sleepers._
       | 
       | "modern"? or "mounted"?
        
         | mrob wrote:
         | Looks to me that they forgot a comma. It probably should be
         | "modern, on concrete sleepers."
        
         | mnd999 wrote:
         | Both, I think their point is that they've got rid of most of
         | the wooden sleepers and replaced them with 'modern' concrete.
         | 
         | Unfortunately, 'modern' is a pretty meaningless word and tells
         | us nothing as to the why of this.
        
       | penguin_booze wrote:
       | Ha! The other day, I was having a short chat with a fellow
       | commuter on this very topic (including 'why not in other
       | countries?'), in the context of the expected heat wave on Monday
       | and Tuesday. And the reason, I speculated, was exactly same as
       | mentioned in the article. I'm glad I wasn't wrong. I'll share
       | this article if I see them again.
        
       | N_A_T_E wrote:
       | Sounds like someone needs to invent some sort of expansion joint.
       | I assume its a hard engineering problem with significant trade
       | offs.
        
         | Ekaros wrote:
         | There is probably one, but the design was done for temperature
         | range outside the current conditions. You can accommodate only
         | for so much and at some point it make sense to say yeah, this
         | temperature is good enough. There is very likely some trade-
         | offs involved as well.
        
         | chrisseaton wrote:
         | > Sounds like someone needs to invent some sort of expansion
         | joint.
         | 
         | As the article says, there basically isn't the money or will to
         | fix the problem, so they're leaving it as is.
        
         | iggldiggl wrote:
         | Such things exist
         | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breather_switch), but so far
         | they've been mostly only used for localised
         | expansion/contraction/movement hotspots, i.e. bridges longer
         | that 50 - 100 m or so.
        
       | jameshart wrote:
       | Missing context for international readers who perhaps may not be
       | aware of the weather forecast for the UK next week:
       | 
       | "England braces for 40C temperatures as experts warn thousands
       | could die" - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-
       | news/2022/jul/15/heat-emergen...
        
         | dcomp wrote:
         | And for further context its the first RED (danger to life)
         | warning [0] (for the purposes of heat, other red warning have
         | been issued [1])
         | 
         | [0] https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/press-
         | office/news/weat... [1]
         | https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/learn-about/past-uk-wea...
        
           | krona wrote:
           | Most of the danger to life is people drowning in lakes,
           | rivers etc.
        
             | jameshart wrote:
             | British people are not normally found in lakes or rivers.
             | If they are being driven into those dangerous environments
             | by the weather, perhaps the weather could be considered
             | dangerous.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | According to the Romans it's common to find them there:
               | 
               | > Their form of rule is democratic for the most part, and
               | they are very fond of plundering; consequently they
               | choose their boldest men as rulers....They can endure
               | hunger and cold and any kind of hardship; _for they
               | plunge into the swamps and exist there for many days with
               | only their heads above water_ , and in the forests they
               | support themselves upon bark and roots, and for all
               | emergencies they prepare a certain kind of food, the
               | eating of a small portion of which, the size of a bean,
               | prevents them from feeling either hunger or thirst
               | 
               | https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana
               | /br...
               | 
               | It's historical writing so it _must_ be true.
        
               | jameshart wrote:
               | This is fantastic. I'm assuming that "a certain kind of
               | food, the eating of a small portion of which, the size of
               | a bean, prevents them from feeling either hunger or
               | thirst" was Kendall Mint Cake.
        
           | rozab wrote:
           | ..since that warning was introduced in 2021
        
             | tfsh wrote:
             | It was introduced given the increase in temperature. This
             | is the first time in recorded history that the temperature
             | in the UK has been forecasted to reach 40degC
        
             | mnobu wrote:
             | This will be the hottest temp ever recorded in the UK
             | though.
        
             | dcomp wrote:
             | To be fair they have been monitoring deaths before [0],
             | just the first time there's a national warning to the
             | public.
             | 
             | Quite a few schools have decided to use this warning to
             | close as they are unable to manage heat on their premises
             | [1]
             | 
             | [0] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/phe-
             | heatwave-mort...
        
         | Izkata wrote:
         | > 40C
         | 
         | And for those of us in the US who don't know but aren't curious
         | enough to look it up: 104 F
        
       | mechhacker wrote:
       | This is a very common engineering challenge, but I don't have
       | experience with the specifics of rails.
       | 
       | Roads (especially near bridges) have expansion joints so that the
       | sections can expand and contract in hotter/colder weather. It
       | looks like slab tracks just have more support and try to fight
       | expansion. This will increase the load required to buckle the
       | tracks, but it will put the entire system (slabs, rails) under
       | more stress.
       | 
       | In other industries this can really affect the entire design of
       | mechanisms. Motor mounts in cars look to allow thermal expansion
       | between the hot engine components and the chassis without letting
       | the whole thing shake apart by being too loose. You can make
       | designs such that they are very close to being statically
       | determinate, meaning there is only one restraint for each of the
       | 6 degrees of freedom, so relative thermal expansion doesn't
       | stress and fatigue adjacent structures. However, that means that
       | adding redundancy in case a single support failure can be quite
       | tricky...
       | 
       | One area where thermal expansion is very challenging is
       | fasteners. I've seen some machines where the joint had to be
       | different materials than the fasteners, and it had to survive a
       | wide temperature range, so the torque on the fastener, including
       | testing it and calibrating the tools, became extremely critical.
        
       | nimbius wrote:
       | as someone who 30 years ago laid rail for the RJ corman railroad,
       | the hardest sites were in the southwest. track that can go from
       | near zero to fifty celcius is not long for this world. if the job
       | site was quiet some days you could even hear the ties groaning as
       | the sun came up.
       | 
       | in the US we use a vision system on a special rail repair engine
       | that checks for issues, but common controls are lowering speed
       | and some days just not using certain tracks
        
       | edf13 wrote:
       | Tl;dr
       | 
       | They don't stress them to higher temps because (they say) it will
       | cause fractures/stress at winter temps
        
       | dboreham wrote:
       | Article doesn't mention but welded track does have expansion
       | joints. They just exceed their expansion range at some point.
       | Also rails can expand beyond their mounting geometry between the
       | joints, on curves.
       | 
       | I noticed the white sprayed tracks in Italy recently. It didn't
       | prevent the network becoming congested due to speed restrictions
       | imposed as temperatures exceeded 105F.
        
       | scotty79 wrote:
       | Does UK really have such large temperature variability?
       | 
       | I thought inland European countries have it way worse.
        
         | 317070 wrote:
         | Yes, you are correct. The UK has a temperate climate, unlike
         | the continental climate in many other European countries.
        
         | smcl wrote:
         | It still occurs in other countries too, you're just reading the
         | explanation by Network Rail who manage UK tracks.
        
       | davidthewatson wrote:
       | Computer vision can be used to classify sun kinks at speed from a
       | train-mounted sensor.
       | 
       | The GPS-triangulated sun kink data can then be used to dispatch
       | repair teams to the appropriate location preventing derailments
       | in the process.
       | 
       | This has been studied academically and commercially in the US for
       | a few years, at least. I'm not aware of a commercial deployment,
       | but it may be in progress given the published R&D.
       | 
       | For instance:
       | 
       | https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.01286.pdf
       | 
       | From the paper: "Sun kink classifier could classify
       | professionally simulated sun kink videos with a precision of
       | 97.5%."
        
         | gsnedders wrote:
         | The challenge is ensuring you have sufficiently frequent passes
         | on hot days, and therefore sufficient fitted trains, right?
         | 
         | That paper seems to be notable because it's doing it from
         | vision alone (and no LIDAR), whereas similar things (including
         | gauging generally) have been used commercially for a while; see
         | eg http://www.rail-vision.co.uk/
        
       | WithinReason wrote:
       | > The problem is that if we stressed Britain's rails to the same
       | degree as those in very hot countries, there would be the risk of
       | increased tension on the rails in the winter.
       | 
       | This doesn't make sense, relative to many European countries the
       | UK has much milder summers _and_ winters.
        
         | gizajob wrote:
         | In the UK, the railway in summer breaks because it gets too
         | warm. In winter it breaks because leaves get on the line or it
         | is too cold. If its snowing, forget it. For a country whose
         | national pastime is the weather, we don't deal with it very
         | well the second it shifts out of its bland average. We spend
         | the whole year wishing it would get hot and sunny, and then
         | freak out the second it does.
        
           | permo-w wrote:
           | you could argue that that's because we have such mild
           | weather. in other countries typical changes in the weather
           | are a bigger deal, so it's less appropriate for small talk.
           | this would go some way to explaining why trains stop running
           | when it's very rainy/hot/cold/leafy/snowy. we don't expect
           | the weather to be drastic, and it rarely is, so we're not
           | prepared for it when it happens.
           | 
           | I have no idea whether any of that is true (I doubt it), but
           | it was interesting to write out.
        
             | nicoburns wrote:
             | British weather is indeed often milder than that of other
             | countries, but it's also often much less predictable. In
             | some countries it's pretty reliably hot and sunny all
             | summer and snowy all winter.
        
               | throwaway294566 wrote:
               | In Britain, reliably, once per day it'll rain. Only the
               | rest of the weather is unpredictable.
        
               | nicoburns wrote:
               | Not in the past few weeks!
        
           | benbristow wrote:
           | And for a country that invented the railway too! (Although
           | also meaning we have the world's oldest system, and a very
           | expansive system at that - even after the Beeching cuts)
        
           | lazide wrote:
           | Sounds like Seattle!
        
         | ThePadawan wrote:
         | The Swiss railway has a (DE/FR/IT only) page at [0] to explain
         | what they do.
         | 
         | - Start adjusting the tension on tracks starting in March when
         | it gets warmer
         | 
         | - Use more expensive concrete sleepers where high forces appear
         | (as TFA mentions)
         | 
         | - Cool exceptionally problematic parts of the track with water
         | from tank cars
         | 
         | So in summary:
         | 
         | - spend money
         | 
         | - spend money
         | 
         | - spend money
         | 
         | That could explain why Network Rail isn't keen on doing any of
         | that.
         | 
         | [0] https://company.sbb.ch/de/medien/dossier-
         | medienschaffende/so...
        
           | gsnedders wrote:
           | > - Start adjusting the tension on tracks starting in March
           | when it gets warmer
           | 
           | And of course this also implies adjusting the tension on the
           | tracks starting in October or so, too!
        
           | WithinReason wrote:
           | Despite saving all that money, the UK has the most expensive
           | train ticket prices in Europe:
           | 
           | https://www.vouchercloud.com/resources/train-prices-
           | across-e...
        
             | benbristow wrote:
             | And most of that money (apart from the recently
             | nationalised operators like Northern, ScotRail and LNER)
             | goes back to the foreign-ran railways (Abellio/Netherlands,
             | Amey/Keolis/France, Arriva/Germany).
             | 
             | It's ace!
        
           | Sharlin wrote:
           | It's amazing how many problems are solvable simply by
           | spending money.
        
             | ThePadawan wrote:
             | A very Swiss attitude.
             | 
             | Like that time in 2016 when a Swiss town paid a 290k CHF
             | fine rather than house Syrian refugees [0]!
             | 
             | [0] https://lenews.ch/2016/06/16/swiss-town-pays-instead-
             | of-taki...
        
               | jeffrallen wrote:
               | Yes that's shameful behavior. Good thing there are 5000
               | other communes that take their social responsibilities
               | seriously.
        
             | jeffrallen wrote:
             | It's amazing how many problems are solvable when a society
             | chooses to solve them.
        
         | acer4666 wrote:
         | The article explains that European countries replace their
         | tracks between summer and winter
        
           | lrem wrote:
           | That seems inconsistent with my experience, unless they
           | manage to do it completely without disturbing traffic.
        
             | gsnedders wrote:
             | A lot of the re-tensioning can be done overnight; there's
             | no actual replacement, just changing the level of
             | (pre)stress the steel is under.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | ThePadawan wrote:
           | All I could find is this paragraph:
           | 
           | > Some countries regularly have extremes in temperature that
           | affect their railway. They may adjust their rails between
           | summer and winter, or have other measures in place to manage
           | the effects over the long term.
           | 
           | Which, when paraphrased, says: "Other countries may or may
           | not do something else".
           | 
           | (Which, when paraphrased, says the PR person had no effing
           | clue.)
        
             | jaclaz wrote:
             | Also "adjust" does not mean "replace".
        
       | chx wrote:
       | The British rail situation can lead to very interesting problems.
       | https://www.londonreconnections.com/2015/know-run-story-behi...
       | it's one of the most interesting postmortems of a non-software
       | issue I've ever read.
        
       | rwmj wrote:
       | Northern Japan has a much wider range of temperatures than the UK
       | -- -20C in winter to high 30s in summer would all be considered
       | normal -- and yet they can run high speed trains all year at 200+
       | km/h. How is that done?
        
         | nabla9 wrote:
         | Shinkasen tracks have dense placement of strong fasteners and
         | prestressed reinforced concrete slabs over thick cement asphalt
         | mortar.
         | 
         | (basically tracks over concrete road over thick asphalt like
         | road)
         | 
         | This is question of economics, not question of ability.
        
         | numpad0 wrote:
         | Multiples of other solutions + expansion joints. Expanding long
         | rails blend into fixed "tongue" rails and goes off track
         | towards the sides.
         | 
         | 1: (for illustrations) https://costep-
         | webteam.hatenadiary.jp/entry/20061023/p1
         | 
         | 2: (for illustrations) http://tarouroom.blog89.fc2.com/blog-
         | entry-968.html
        
         | gsnedders wrote:
         | As with many (most?) high speed lines, it's done through
         | maintenance overnight: the Shinkansen doesn't run from midnight
         | till 6am, plus dealing with the potential expansion through
         | additional work on the track during those overnight periods
         | (largely by re-stressing the steel).
         | 
         | This is all about overnight access and about the cost of the
         | work involved.
        
         | smcl wrote:
         | They'll perhaps use slab track, like HS2 in the UK will use.
        
           | rwmj wrote:
           | This one? https://www.railengineer.co.uk/slab-track-paving-
           | the-p-way/ How does this make the rails less likely to
           | buckle? Just because it's held in place more tightly?
        
             | pkulak wrote:
             | Yes. They actually talk about it in the article.
        
             | bitdivision wrote:
             | > The CWR is subject to compression loads due to
             | temperature changes, which can cause buckling, or sharp
             | lateral displacement. These phenomena are prevented using
             | reinforced fastenings, sleepers and ballast.
             | 
             | https://www.ejrcf.or.jp/jrtr/jrtr15/f38_tec.html
             | 
             | I found the above, but it doesn't say that much about
             | buckling. I don't think they use slab tracks however.
             | 
             | If buckling is the lateral movement of the track due to
             | thermal expansion, I would imagine the old wooden sleepers
             | would be much easier to pull sideways. Looking at the above
             | link about slab tracks, they look far more secure and less
             | likely to move sideways.
        
               | gumby wrote:
               | I wasn't familiar with rail ballast but found this good
               | link which explains what the term refers to and how it
               | helps keep the rails aligned (explicitly the posted
               | article talks about when current mitigation is
               | indequate).
               | 
               | https://railroadrails.com/information/what-is-railway-
               | ballas...
        
       | MilaM wrote:
       | Not sure if this is relevant here, but shiny metal surfaces emit
       | less thermal energy than painted metal surfaces. Learned about
       | this recently while reading about home heating radiators.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation#Surface_effe...
        
         | lazide wrote:
         | Rusty metal covered in dirt, grease, and oil probably does
         | pretty badly though.
        
       | colordrops wrote:
       | I love how this article answers the question in the first couple
       | sentences.
        
       | immmmmm wrote:
       | 1.1 degree above pre-industrial reference and it is already a
       | nightmare and yet we drill again to keep the carbon economy
       | running.
       | 
       | not a climatologist (just an interested physicist) but (some of)
       | these heatwaves overshoot models predictions by a fair margin.
       | 
       | can't wait for the fresh papers quantifying that this autumn.
       | it's gonna be bleak.
        
         | zimpenfish wrote:
         | I'm starting to take a small crumb of comfort that my advancing
         | years mean I'm probably going to be gone before it starts
         | getting _really_ bleak. Feel bad for all my younger relatives
         | though.
        
       | GekkePrutser wrote:
       | In Holland they used to leave big gaps, diagonally cut so there'd
       | be overlap.
       | 
       | This have the trains a rythmic kadunk sound that's even been
       | popularized in songs :) It also worked quite well as far as I
       | know but I suppose it caused more wear and tear on the rolling
       | stock.
       | 
       | Not sure if this is still done there though.
        
         | jorams wrote:
         | > Not sure if this is still done there though.
         | 
         | It's not[1], and there is risk of track buckles in the
         | Netherlands as well. ProRail does extra monitoring during
         | heatwaves[2]. I don't remember ever hearing news about this
         | being a notable problem, but it probably does happen.
         | 
         | [1]: https://www.prorail.nl/veelgestelde-vragen/hoe-vangt-
         | prorail... [2]: https://www.prorail.nl/nieuws/maatregelen-
         | tegen-de-hitte
        
           | GekkePrutser wrote:
           | I wonder if this new 'voegloos' stuff is quite as good at
           | absorbing heat as the 'kedeng kedeng' ones though :)
           | 
           | I don't remember that in the 80s/90s there were such concerns
           | and I had family working on railway maintenance. The climate
           | problem wasn't as big back then but we had some scorching
           | summers too.
           | 
           | Instead the autumn was the all hands on deck period with
           | leaves on the tracks and later in the autumn snow freezing
           | the switches.
        
         | t0mas88 wrote:
         | That sound does not seem to be there anymore, but that could
         | just be because of better isolation or suspension on the
         | trains.
        
       | jpollock wrote:
       | This drove me down a rabbit hole, so I thought I would share.
       | 
       | Track used to be separate pieces (seemingly before 1950), but
       | they are now continuous welded rail [1][3]. This was done to
       | allow trains to go faster, and lowers maintenance on the trains.
       | This confused me because trains go "clack clack clack" - I guess
       | that's foley now.
       | 
       | However, it means track is more prone to buckling, since there
       | aren't any expansion joints, like we have on bridges.
       | 
       | Slack is added/removed from the rails by stressing the track
       | during installation [2].
       | 
       | They heat (or mechanically stretch) the track to the length at a
       | chosen "neutral" temperature. Then they install the track. This
       | allows them to calculate the max expansion and contraction the
       | track will see and offset those forces with the sleepers
       | (horizontal forces?) and the ballast (vertical forces?).
       | 
       | The rail can still buckle - this is engineering. If the ballast
       | fails, or the temperatures exceed the maximum allowed for, then
       | it will buckle. It also looks like it must be continually
       | destressed by going along the rail, cutting it and re-welding it?
       | [4]
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_track#Continuous_welde...
       | 
       | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_stressing
       | 
       | [3] Thermite track welding:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uxsFglz2ig
       | 
       | [4] https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/peter-calder-old-methods-
       | keep-...
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | CWR is common to reduce noise and bumps. The latter in
         | particular is really important at high speeds, because the feel
         | of a bump to a rider is a lot worse.
        
         | salty_biscuits wrote:
         | Buckling at high temperature is better than fracture at low
         | temperatures. I used to do research in this area. The "holy
         | grail" technology would be a non destructive way to infer the
         | "neutral stress temperature" of continuously welded rail that
         | has been already installed in a quick and non destructive way.
         | Saw lots of weird hopeful technology prototypes based of
         | measuring the hysteresis curves of induced magnetism in the
         | rail, idea being that the stress would have some effect on the
         | magnetic domains. Never worked in the field AFAIK. Here in
         | Australia they will get hoses out on hot days desperately
         | trying to cool the rail down to stop it buckling.
        
         | tobylane wrote:
         | The neutral temperature is 27C, we may have to follow countries
         | further south in setting it higher.
        
         | int_19h wrote:
         | It should be noted that whether rails are continuous or not
         | depends a lot on the country and the region. There are still
         | many places around the world where you'll find tracks made of
         | separate pieces. For example, Russia has around 10,000
         | kilometers of track like that (out of 85,000 km total).
        
         | redshirtrob wrote:
         | You're correct that the rail needs to continually have its
         | stress managed. This could be cutting the rail and adding a new
         | piece, or removing a bit. This is a fairly labor intensive and
         | costly process so the railroads were very interested in coming
         | up with a way to determine when a buckle or break was most
         | likely.
         | 
         | Buckles and breaks were most common just after a train had left
         | a section of track. The normal approach was to issue slow
         | orders when the temperature got too high (buckle) or too low
         | (break). So there was a lot of interest in finding more
         | accurate ways to determine when slow orders were necessary and
         | to optimize when to add/remove rail.
         | 
         | AFAIK this problem is still outstanding. The product I worked
         | on years ago never quite succeeded. Railroads are a harsh
         | environment.
        
         | laumars wrote:
         | Yeah trains haven't clack clack clack for a long time now.
         | Possibly as much as 20 years for the lines I'm on.
        
       | the_mitsuhiko wrote:
       | What many countries started doing is painting rails white. I
       | believe that is also happening in the UK. I believe they started
       | doing that in Italy with good results. This is what the painting
       | process looks like in Austria in a trial project:
       | https://youtu.be/GBMWHAkk6xM?t=52
        
         | curiousgal wrote:
         | Why aren't they painting them backwards though?
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | Good point. However the paint in the hip is going to rub off
           | anyway and what's underneath is reflective.
        
         | ThePadawan wrote:
         | Here's what SBB (the Swiss train operator) says at [0], german
         | only:
         | 
         | SBB will not rely on tracks painted white because
         | 
         | - it makes it harder to discover cracks in the tracks
         | 
         | - with prolonged use the effect noticeably lessens to due
         | accumulation of dirt
         | 
         | - OBB and SBB have measured he effect at ~5degC and that's not
         | significant enough to be worth it.
         | 
         | [0] https://company.sbb.ch/de/medien/dossier-
         | medienschaffende/so...
        
           | the_mitsuhiko wrote:
           | It might be a mixed bag and presumably different operators
           | have different results. OeBB did not decide yet on the
           | future, smaller operators are. Italy has been painting rails
           | white for many years (40?) and continues to do so.
        
         | ekianjo wrote:
         | how long does the paint last?
        
           | sschueller wrote:
           | I believe it lasts quite a while on the sides and the top is
           | rubbed to a reflective shine when trains run over it anyways.
        
         | nomdep wrote:
        
           | O__________O wrote:
           | Unable to find guidelines or comment from the mods, but HN's
           | comments are in English, please use English unless it is a
           | comment in English explaining a non-English term.
           | 
           | (Dang, please clarify HN's position on non-English comments;
           | believe I recall seeing this before, but unable to find
           | guidelines or comment from you. Thanks.)
           | 
           | EDIT: Related comment from Dang on use of non-English
           | submissions:
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27571809
        
             | pvg wrote:
             | Submissions have to be in English. The problem with the GP
             | comment is not that it's not in English, it's that's it's
             | tropey and unsubstantive. Just flag bad comments and move
             | on.
        
             | zabzonk wrote:
             | I agree completely with "comments in English, please". but
             | despite not learning any German for over 50 years, I came
             | up with "One think works", which is not too far off!
        
               | Akronymus wrote:
               | "So easy, so effective" seems like the most appropriate
               | translation in this case
        
         | benbristow wrote:
         | They started doing that a few years ago. Can see it in action
         | on the main bridge going towards Glasgow Central as there's
         | lots of points (15 platforms), seemed to help.
         | 
         | Alternately, I've seen videos in the likes of Chicago where
         | they've literally installed pretty much bunsen burners and set
         | the rails on fire to deal with the winter.
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z76ywZDXyPw
        
         | linker3000 wrote:
         | From a linked page:
         | 
         | "We paint certain parts of the rail white so they absorb less
         | heat - and expand less. Typically, a rail painted white is
         | 5degC to 10degC cooler than one left unpainted."
        
           | picsao wrote:
        
           | the_mitsuhiko wrote:
           | Looks surprisingly laborious if this Twitter video is to
           | trust:
           | https://twitter.com/networkrail/status/1547986150723244032
        
             | pimlottc wrote:
             | You'd think they could make a robot to paint the rails but
             | then again, the rails on the things that vehicles are
             | supposed to be riding on!
             | 
             | Perhaps you could make a device that rides on one rail
             | while painting the other one. Flip it around and do the
             | other side when you've done the first pass.
        
               | laumars wrote:
               | This is an easy problem to solve. You just have the paint
               | mechanism at the back of the vehicle so it paints after
               | the wheels have moved over the track. Kind of like the
               | reverse of the plough at the front of the train that some
               | networks (not U.K.) have to clear the track before the
               | wheels pass over it.
        
               | jaclaz wrote:
               | Of course that is not a problem.
               | 
               | What needs to be painted is the sides of the rail, the
               | top - even if painted in the process - will return to
               | lucid metal as soon as the next few trains pass on them.
               | 
               | Usually small trucks (Unimogs adapted to rail use) or
               | small convoys are used, see:
               | 
               | https://scalaenne.wordpress.com/2016/07/30/binari-
               | bianchi/
        
               | peterbraden wrote:
               | or just paint behind the robot
        
               | rayiner wrote:
               | And use a pencil instead of inventing a pen that works in
               | zero gravity.
        
               | happymellon wrote:
               | The pencil introduced graphite dust into the air that
               | caused electrical problems.
               | 
               | This is why astronauts use a pen. Sometimes the "cheap
               | and simple" way has side effects that are more harmful
               | than the original problem.
        
               | jakear wrote:
               | Oil pencils and wax pencils are a thing too.
        
               | matkoniecz wrote:
               | And Russian space station (while they had one) was
               | notorious for repeated fires.
               | 
               | Probably that approach to safety was cause for it.
        
               | fl0id wrote:
               | How would this be any better then the video? It would
               | also be much more expensive and complex then what they
               | made.
        
               | Ekaros wrote:
               | Painting vehicle and robot likely cost pretty much the
               | same. And with vehicle you don't really need to think
               | about all of the nitty gritty details of autonomous
               | operations or regulations.
        
               | lkbm wrote:
               | The GP's video shows them using a spraying train car to
               | do it much, much faster. It still has people riding on it
               | and walking alongside, but sure looks more efficient.
               | 
               | Meanwhile, I notice that all the replies to the UK video
               | are people complaining about the rail system reducing
               | headcount and mocking the idea that this task could be
               | automated.
        
               | makomk wrote:
        
               | gambiting wrote:
               | If you read anything about their demands, you will
               | discover that from this year their contract is changing
               | to require more hours at the same pay, so they are
               | literally being given a paycut. In every other industry
               | that would be illegal, but rail workers are expected to
               | just suck it up and be grateful that they even still have
               | a job, right? They protest compulsory redundancies
               | because they know exactly how the British system works -
               | a lot of people will be fired and the rest expected to
               | just pick up the slack and work more hours, without any
               | improvement like automation.
               | 
               | And among other things changes like not being paid for
               | their commute when doing overtime(which was paid for
               | previously), at the time when petrol has crossed PS2/L
               | around the country.
        
               | xyzzyz wrote:
               | Are pay cuts illegal in UK? Wow, that's insane.
        
               | laumars wrote:
               | Why is that insane?
        
               | gambiting wrote:
               | Why is it insane? Maybe I should have clarified - your
               | employer cannot cut your pay without a very good reason
               | and you have to agree to it. In general it's a very
               | tricky process legally, just like letting someone go -
               | you need to make sure it's done correctly or you will
               | lose in court. They cannot just say "from next month you
               | will work extra 2 hours a week at same pay". Like....no?
               | That's not in the employment contract we have signed, it
               | binds both sides. And yet that's exactly what is
               | happening to rail workers.
        
               | xyzzyz wrote:
               | Your clarification makes more sense -- I also consider
               | reduction in pay to be equivalent to firing, a piecewise
               | one. I understand that it means that has to follow all
               | rules about firing people, and that much I also find
               | reasonable. At the same time, I find the rules about
               | firing commonly found in Europe as wrongheaded, but
               | that's not my complain above, which is about "illegality
               | of pay reduction".
        
               | makomk wrote:
               | None of the media coverage I've seen or can find seems to
               | mention this supposed paycut due to more hours at the
               | same pay, including in really sympathetic outlets like
               | the Guardian which describes their demands as being
               | exactly what I claimed. In fact, the only change to terms
               | I can find anywhere that even vaguely resembles that is
               | that maybe some staff will no longer get the same
               | generous overtime multiplier on Sunday, and that's from
               | the literal World Socialist site which is vague enough in
               | their wording that I suspect they might be playing sneaky
               | word games again. (They're... not the most trustworthy
               | source.)
        
               | londons_explore wrote:
               | Such automation will be banned in the UK. Painting things
               | has to be done by hand. Union rules. No unauthorized
               | mechanization! Spray cans are untested technology and are
               | unsafe. Spray paint is worse for the environment and
               | workers health. Besides, painting by hand is better for
               | morale.
               | 
               | Painting will obviously have to happen at night (double
               | pay), and is risky work (double pay again). Oh, and we
               | can't do more than 3 hour shifts because it involves
               | bending down. And we'll be needing a minimum crew of 8 -
               | 1 painter, 1 safety expert, 1 signalling expert, 1
               | electrics expert, 1 spotter, 1 paint quality expert, a
               | foreman to lead the team, and a union rep to check
               | everything is done according to the book. Oh, and
               | wherever the work is being done more than 15 minutes from
               | a toilet, we'll need a mobile toilet booked and
               | installed, as well as a break room. If any of those
               | people are missing or late, we'll cancel the work and
               | retry in 3 months.
        
               | lol768 wrote:
               | Railroad deaths and injuries per capita are much lower
               | than in the USA. I'd say the unions and RAIB have done a
               | pretty good job at improving safety standards.
        
               | thecompilr wrote:
               | Ah, but railroad workers in the US are also part of a
               | union/unions, with arguably even more rules and
               | regulations and very averse to technological advances,
               | since it reduces the need for manual labor. So yeah USA
               | would have more deaths because everything is manual and
               | archaic, whereas in the UK you have things like the DLR,
               | it could never happen in the US.
        
               | londons_explore wrote:
               | The DLR is only automated because it's brand new. It
               | replaced nobodies job. And even that was a real fight to
               | get and caused lots of strikes.
        
               | thecompilr wrote:
               | Of course, but try to add an automated line to the new
               | york subway.
        
               | alt227 wrote:
               | This has been downvoted, but in my experience of 10 years
               | of working in the UK rail industry, this is pretty much
               | spot on.
        
               | ClumsyPilot wrote:
               | while this isn't without merit, I consistently see that
               | individual workers are much more concious of quality of
               | their work and safety/reliability of the end user than
               | the management is.
               | 
               | We've had many industrial accidents, from Bhopal's
               | disaster to Boeing Max, thousands of people died, and all
               | of them were caused by management meddling where they
               | shouldn't. none of them were caused by unions
        
               | nonrandomstring wrote:
               | > we'll be needing a minimum crew of 8 - 1 painter, 1
               | safety expert, 1 signalling expert, 1 electrics expert, 1
               | spotter, 1 paint quality expert, a foreman to lead the
               | team, and a union rep to check everything is done
               | according to the book.
               | 
               | Hah! Typical free market libertarian approach that cuts
               | corners. You can't just go out and start painting stuff
               | matey! What about the viability study? Someone needs to
               | build a model of the processes, and conduct a pilot time
               | and motion study. People won't just accept white rails
               | without consultation. Where's the perception management
               | and transformation campaign to make sure the new white
               | theme is on message and brand aligned for Railtrack?
               | You'll have to add at least 1 lawyer, 1 community liaison
               | officer, 2 PR people, an advertising account executive...
               | 
               | > we'll need a mobile toilet booked and installed
               | 
               | Toilet? Pfff. You can't just go out and stick up a
               | toilet....
        
               | Nition wrote:
               | It's even spraying _in front_ of the train car and then
               | apparently rolling right over it without much trouble
               | (although I note some white paint on the wheels).
        
           | ajkjk wrote:
           | It still blows my mind that the color of something makes such
           | a difference.
        
             | amelius wrote:
             | This is also why I paint my CPUs and GPUs black.
        
             | Too wrote:
             | It's easily relatable, compare wearing a black vs white
             | t-shirt a warm sunny day.
        
             | blibble wrote:
             | a tricolour dog or cat that's been sitting in the sun is
             | how I discovered this as a child!
        
               | mh- wrote:
               | How did you decide what 3 colors to paint them with for
               | the test?
        
               | sangnoir wrote:
               | It sounds like a natural experiment to me - genetics
               | decided the colors (I'm guessing black, white and brown:
               | colors commonly found in multicolored cat & dog breeds)
        
             | Ekaros wrote:
             | I suppose you could as well polish them very well, but I
             | think that will last shorter time than paint.
        
             | nathancahill wrote:
             | Wait until you hear about how much money we could be saving
             | if roofs were white instead of the typical dark gray.
             | (Locale: en-US)
        
               | bpye wrote:
               | Wait why aren't roofs white then?
        
               | burlesona wrote:
               | Cultural norms are really hard to change. There is no
               | reasonable world in which businesspeople in the US south
               | and southwest should wear suits and ties. But if they
               | didn't, they would not be taken seriously in our culture.
        
               | Sharlin wrote:
               | They are in many parts of the world. The reasons why they
               | aren't in other parts of the world are many, but they
               | include the fact that bitumen as a petroleum byproduct
               | has been cheap; other traditional roof materials used in
               | Western Europe are also naturally fairly dark; in cooler
               | climates heating has historically been a more pressing
               | concern than cooling; people migrating from said cooler
               | climates have not bothered to adapt their construction
               | methods to local conditions; AC powered with cheap fossil
               | energy has been seen as a silver bullet; people choose to
               | avoid upfront expenses even if that means suffering in
               | the future; cooling is rapidly becoming a concern even in
               | said cooler climates, but adaptation lags behind because
               | people are surprised that the climate change is actually
               | now _their_ problem and not some future people's
               | problem...
        
               | CalRobert wrote:
               | Just built a house in Ireland (moved here from
               | California) and have been very glad we ignored basically
               | all the advice people wanted to give us and went for
               | things that make it easy to cool. High ceilings with roof
               | windows to vent heat have made the last couple days much
               | more pleasant. Really glad it's wood and we're not
               | dealing with all that thermal mass people here seem so
               | enamored of.
               | 
               | I also have a 200 year old stone cottage and when it gets
               | hot it stays hot for a very long time (same for being
               | cold).
        
               | fmajid wrote:
               | There is such a thing as white bitumen, and Obama's
               | Nobel-laureate Secretary of Energy Steven Chu had
               | suggested we adopt it.
        
               | mediaman wrote:
               | Many newer roofs are white. For example, EPDM roofs are
               | all near-white.
        
               | mikeyouse wrote:
               | Meh, my EPDM roof is black.. I think you're thinking of
               | TPO?
        
               | DiabloD3 wrote:
               | If you live in the north, it's so you don't have roof
               | collapses in the winter due to snow buildup.
               | 
               | If you live in the south, it's because people think there
               | isn't good roofing materials that can be lighter colors.
               | Those people are wrong.
        
               | Too wrote:
               | Once the snow is covering the roof the color can't
               | matter? This would only have a marginal effect on very
               | mild snow to melt it before it accumulates. Snowy days
               | also don't have much sun to catch to begin with, clouds
               | ya know. No, roof collapses are prevented by stronger and
               | more sloping roof.
        
               | alar44 wrote:
               | I can tell you're not from the north. Snowy days aren't
               | dark and cloudy. You'll wear sunglasses sometimes. Dark
               | roofs absolutely help melt snow. The snow starts melting
               | near the gutters and then climbs upward. The snow also
               | sublimates. When it gets really cold, clouds can't form
               | so there are a lot of bright days without a cloud in the
               | sky.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | The north could (and is!) solved by metal roofs that are
               | white or light colored and steep - steep enough that snow
               | slides right off.
        
               | gumby wrote:
               | Because they produce glare for neighbors. Also tradition.
               | Mirrors would be even better, but apart from expense and
               | weight, worse for anyone in the path of the glare :-/
               | [edit: reply comment to this says mirrors wouldn't
               | actually be better]
               | 
               | But, for example, California is requiring light roofs and
               | other mitigating issues, so there is some progress.
               | 
               | BTW if you do decide to paint your roof (or any other
               | external surface) please use TiO2 paint as the UV from
               | the sun will then cause it to break down pollutants like
               | NOx and greenhouse gases like methane.
        
               | jccooper wrote:
               | Mirrors have low emissivity. While they accept a bit less
               | heat, they will hold on to it more than something with
               | white paint (which can have pretty good emissivity) and
               | will thus get hotter.
        
               | gumby wrote:
               | Thanks, that's interesting. Al is a pretty good IR
               | reflector, and I believe most common mirrors these days
               | use it as the reflective coating. Is the glass the
               | problem?
        
               | nine_k wrote:
               | The roof of the apartment building where I live is
               | silvery-white.
               | 
               | It makes totals sense. I also suppose that many people
               | who own single-family houses would not do that, mostly
               | because it looks odd. Looking odd is something that makes
               | people uncomfortable.
               | 
               | When you find a way for a light-colored roof to look
               | _cool_ while also not costing an arm and a leg, people
               | will gladly adopt it. This happened to solar panels when
               | they started to look well and also signal wealth and care
               | of the Earth.
        
         | spyder wrote:
         | And for a better effect they could use paint that can cool
         | below the ambient temperature by radiating infrared to space
         | (if they aren't already using that, but it's probably more
         | expensive):
         | 
         | https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03911-8
         | 
         | Here is a YouTuber trying to making such paint:
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3bJnKmeNJY
         | 
         | Another article:
         | 
         | https://greekreporter.com/2022/05/08/revolutionary-white-pai...
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | The same thing is done to roofs in hotter climates; modern roof
         | paint (expensive, it was $160 a gallon when I used it) on a
         | roll roof can drop interior house temperatures 5-10 degrees or
         | more.
        
           | mordechai9000 wrote:
           | We replaced our 40 year old tar and gravel roof (with small
           | light colored stones) with a dark colored architectural
           | shingle. There was an immediate, noticable difference. On
           | summer nights you could feel the heat radiating out of the
           | attic after a long day in sun.
           | 
           | This was in a cold climate, albeit at high latitude, so long
           | days and low sun angle in the summer means more insolation.
           | Since we rarely get above 70F here, I didn't think it would
           | make much difference. Of course, it's only noticable a couple
           | months out of the year.
        
             | nine_k wrote:
             | In a cold climate it could help with heating costs though,
             | I suppose?
        
           | toomuchtodo wrote:
           | Does this increase the longevity of the roofing material if
           | used on something like asphalt shingles?
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | It can, yes. But often with shingles you're better of
             | replacing them when worn with shingles that have the
             | reflectivity "built in".
        
         | cassepipe wrote:
         | Can't eroding paint chips pollute the environment ?
        
           | Faaak wrote:
           | Same as when you fart
        
         | masswerk wrote:
         | From the video: first trials achieved a cooling by 5 to 8degC.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-07-16 23:00 UTC)