[HN Gopher] RSS is back as an underpinning to SlackOps ___________________________________________________________________ RSS is back as an underpinning to SlackOps Author : conoro Score : 135 points Date : 2022-07-18 15:40 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (conoroneill.net) (TXT) w3m dump (conoroneill.net) | dewey wrote: | > You can sign up for emails that go into the black hole of your | inbox | | You could also just get the unique email address of a channel and | let the email notifications go there, same result: | https://slack.com/help/articles/206819278-Send-emails-to-Sla... | AtNightWeCode wrote: | RSS never seems to work on Windows. Funny when it is so simple. I | did not realize this before. A simple client that fetches a feed, | parses it, and searches the content for a keyword took me ~25 | minutes to implement. | NelsonMinar wrote: | Don't call it a comeback! | | There's still this lurking mess of RSS 0.91 vs 1.0 vs 2.0 vs | Atom. As one of the folks involved in creating Atom I'm | frustrated with the outcome. | | These days it'd probably be JSON, right? | detaro wrote: | There is JSONFeed, but that was pretty much a flash in the pan. | kevincox wrote: | If it was created instead of Atom it would have been nice, | but it doesn't have any major advantages so no reason to add | yet another format to the mix. | WorldMaker wrote: | It was created taking some lessons of Atom into account. | | It does have a few minor advantages: multiple attachment | support, more "branding" images support (author avatars, | post "banners"), easier to build JSON than XML in most API | backends these days. The one major advantage is that | JSONFeed is easier to work with it in tandem with WebSub | and other pubsub systems that assume messages are natively | JSON, you can use the same JSONFeed item generating code | for both pull (HTTP GET) and push (WebSub) scenarios. | | Certainly even the main advantage isn't a huge reason to | switch to JSONFeed if you've already got RSS/Atom feeds, | but I believe the hope for JSONFeed was always that it | would spark some sites/backends that don't want to support | XML, don't have good XML libraries, or don't want to use | their template languages to drive RSS/Atom feeds to be able | to build something simpler instead resulting in more feeds | overall than if things were just left to the XML-ish status | quo. I don't know how successful it has been on that front, | though, but I appreciate it exists for trying. | latexr wrote: | > that was pretty much a flash in the pan. | | I'll repurpose an older comment[1]. It was in response to "I | doubt very much [JSON feeds] will catch on". | | > There's little incentive for websites to change to JSON | feeds when their RSS feeds are already implemented, working | well, and generated automatically. But several good RSS | readers added support for JSON feeds when the format was | introduced and that's all you need for it to be viable; it | isn't important if it "catches on" after that when the | flexibility is there. | | > JSON feeds were great for me because I generate my own | feeds for personal consumption and can now do so with simpler | code. I understand I'm in a minority--most people consume | feeds and never create their own--but the larger point is | JSON feeds may have already done their job: they exist and | are supported if you need them. | | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30777477 | throw0101a wrote: | > _There 's still this lurking mess of RSS 0.91 vs 1.0 vs 2.0 | vs Atom._ | | Are there any technical reasons to use RSS instead of Atom in | new deployments? | | (I can perhaps see leaving legacy RSS links created pre-Atom in | place.) | giantrobot wrote: | > Are there any technical reasons to use RSS instead of Atom | in new deployments? | | There's no technical reason. Unfortunately many CMSes still | emit barely usable RSS v2. There's also the branding issue of | RSS the format essentially being the name of the technology. | Someone saying "I want an RSS feed" ends up with the | implementer making an RSS v2 feed rather than a better Atom | feed and just labeling it RSS. | CharlesW wrote: | > _There 's still this lurking mess of RSS 0.91 vs 1.0 vs 2.0 | vs Atom._ | | Maybe in theory, but as a heavy RSS user this has never been an | issue in practice. For example, WordPress sites support both by | default -- RSS at /feed/, Atom at /feed/atom/, but apps like | Feedly hide this implementation plumbing during normal use. | FernandoMax wrote: | I loved blogs, I loved the vibe (like newsletters today) and I | loved RSS (way better than email for receiving information. IN | fact I am creating a project, and It will have updates by RSS. | Why? Because I f**ing love it. | low_tech_punk wrote: | Never underestimate the resilience of "low" tech. Rule of least | power still holds true. | | Prior HN discussions: Turn GitHub into an RSS Reader | (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27010144) | powersnail wrote: | RSS has been alive this whole time. Blogs usually have it by | default, the big news organizations have it. | | The only thing I'm not satisfied with reading news on RSS, is | that news organizations push too many articles, to the point that | reading the headlines alone takes quite some time. There's nearly | 100 articles per day per source sometimes. Unlike a newspaper, | which has a natural structure of priority and hierarchy, in an | RSS reader, every head line has the same salience, and it's a | pain to weed out what's important. | | I kinda hope news organizations would make a separate "weekly | digest feed", 30 or so articles per week. | jamesq wrote: | With FlipRSS.com we let subscribers choose only the content | they want to receive. Using RSS feeds, matched to interest | groups, content creators can keep in regular contact but | deliver more personalised subscriber experiences. We love RSS! | ecliptik wrote: | Newsblur has a training feature [1], with a thumbs up/down on | article tags, author, and keywords in a title that can bubble | up more interesting articles or completely hide them. | | Unfortunately training is per feed, there's a newer Premium Pro | tier with global training coming out with it, but it is much | more expensive [2]. | | 1. https://www.newsblur.com/faq (under Intelligence section) | | 2. https://forum.newsblur.com/t/global-keyword-training/5419/6 | mh- wrote: | Wow, $299/year. you weren't kidding. | | I assume this is targeted at professionals that are trying to | stay abreast of developments around certain topics/subjects. | If you think about it through that lens it's reasonably | priced, I suppose. | wahnfrieden wrote: | lol all these RSS readers really go in on solving problems | as broadly as possible - not just ocean boiling, it leaves | each user with a subpar experience even if it's novel | (having to laboriously refine results yourself). it would | be easy for them to for instance scrape many popular news | sources or APIs for ranking/top story info to at least | cover these extremely common and extremely noisy feeds | uoaei wrote: | Yes. Feedly seems to be marketing itself at investors and | speculators lately (or trading bots I suppose), because | they're using NLP to highlight and categorize articles | based on whether they mention acquisitions, mergers, | leadership changes, etc. | shepherdjerred wrote: | I think feedly has features to help filter less popular | articles | mike-cardwell wrote: | I added rss filter/grep support to my homebrew rss->email | script. So for example, I follow | https://news.ycombinator.com/rss but only for articles with | titles matching certain patterns: | mike@klaus:~$ rss --list|grep ycomb 155. | https://news.ycombinator.com/rss mike@klaus:~$ rss | --list-grep 155 74. title = | (?i)\b((e-?|web)?mail|hardenize|irc|internet relay chat|grpc|ha | shicorp|rust|debian|c\+\+|perl|(bit|name)coin|tor|pgp|gpg|gnupg | |openpgp|digitalocean|ovh|linode|grepular|email\s*privacy\s*tes | ter|parsemail|ssl|https|backdoor|apache|exim|distribut|peer | (to|2) peer|vpn|secur|anonym|webrtc|torrent|webtorrent|nextclou | d|owncloud|graphql)(ity|ous|e?s|ing?|ed?)?\b | | I also randomly hit the front page of course, otherwise I | wouldn't have seen this. Maybe I should add "rss" to my regex | acdw wrote: | I had this problem too, until I installed and configured | sfeed[1] on my server --- now it's all on one page, and much | less "push-y" :P | | [1]: https://codemadness.org/sfeed-simple-feed-parser.html | | (You can see my setup at https://acdw.casa/planet) | reaperducer wrote: | Not a complete solution to your problem, but the New York Times | at least offers different RSS feeds for different sections. | | So you can have a different feed for Science and Technology, | and one for Australia, and one for New York. By not using the | front page firehose, you can keep the number of inbound | articles to a more manageable level. | remram wrote: | The BBC as well: https://www.bbc.com/news/10628494 ("top | stories", "world", "politics", "health", "technology", ...) | | Though like many sites, I have no idea how you would reach | the "feeds" page from the front page (I gave up and searched | Google for it) | reaperducer wrote: | If you have Reeder, you just paste the regular web page URL | into it and it tries to figure out the RSS address on its | own. It's possible that other RSS readers do the same, | since the RSS information is usually in the page's | metadata. | vorpalhex wrote: | If you just want highlights, https://brutalist.report is my go | to | asdff wrote: | newsboat supports regex filters and macros/outside scripts | which can be powerful | tbyehl wrote: | > You can sign up for emails that go into the black hole of your | inbox | | I feel like Slack has already become a black hole equal to my | Inbox in all respects and am hopeful that the Interoffice Mail | envelope will stage a comeback for the things I really need to | see. | mbesto wrote: | Is there any way outside of just polling every 1~5 minutes to get | realtime updates to RSS? Curious what is standard here? If you do | do polling, what interval? | banana_giraffe wrote: | Yes, you need to poll. Ideally with If-Modified-Since and If- | None-Match headers so you can save some resources if the feed | hasn't changed. | anotherevan wrote: | WebSub (nee PubSubHubbub) can work well if the RSS feed | supports it. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSub | rakoo wrote: | Apart from websub, which does require some resources, servers | could provide long-polling such that the socket remains open, | and give a reply as soon as there is one. Clients don't poll, | servers aren't flooded (but do need to keep an open connection | ) | Pakdef wrote: | I poll every hour... for my need, that is plenty | qw wrote: | I don't know if they are still in use, but there are pub/sub | services that can be used for notifications. | | This was created to avoid unnecessary polling of RSS/Atom | feeds: | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSub | zaik wrote: | XMPP PubSub nodes: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0277.html | derekzhouzhen wrote: | If you need realtime update, then RSS is probably not the right | tool. For polling, I currently do the following: | | * with `HTTP 304: not modified` result, I'll come back in 60 | minutes * if there is any update, I'll come back in 4 hours * | if there is no cache control header, such as etag or last- | modified, I will poll every 12 hours. | timbit42 wrote: | I usually do 60 minutes. I'm not desperate enough to check | every 5 or 10 minutes. I've come across a few websites that | block you if you refresh too frequently. I'm not sure whether | those ones still do that though. | rambambram wrote: | > RSS and advertising never really made good bedfellows. | | Isn't Feedburner part of Google nowadays? I remember reading | somewhere that they inject ads in the feeds. | mpclark wrote: | Feedburner is a zombie product now, and has been for a few | years. | rambambram wrote: | I'm subscribed to some feeds from them. I didn't notice any | ads, yet. Do you mean by 'zombie product' that they don't do | ads anymore? | karaterobot wrote: | I think it's that it feels like a dead product, even though | it's still running. | | Not a lot of new features being developed, and some | features getting turned off "to support the product's next | chapter"[1]. | | There hasn't been a firm announcement about Feedburner | being sunsetted, but given Google's history of killing | things off (including Reader, apropos of this thread's | topic), it does feel like the walking dead. | | https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2021/04/changes- | to... | Kye wrote: | They did at least clean out services that had been dead for | 15 years. | pbardea wrote: | Funny seeing this pop-up on my #hacker-news slack channel that | periodically polls for the top stories :) | | I actually prefer the ability to push things like the top stories | of the day to me through either Slack on email rather than having | the temptation to constantly refresh an RSS feed app. An added | bonus is that I frequently add some custom logic to curate the | feed to my liking (based on the feed). | hosh wrote: | I know XMPP is not as popular these days, but there is an XMPP | extension for pushing Atom stanzas as a sort of the push | complement to RSS. | | ... and using Slack to consolidate RSS turns RSS from pull to | push. (Slack probably has caching mechanisms across all | workspaces to reduce pull bandwith). | zaik wrote: | For those who want to try it, movim.eu is a federated social | network build on this XMPP extension. | hosh wrote: | Do you know if there is a name for that XMPP/Atom pubsub | service, and if web publishers can put up some kind of icon | so people know they can subscribe to that kind of a feed? | warpeggio wrote: | If you're already using Slack to consume information | asynchronously, this might be an OK fit. | | I would advise against co-mingling an RSS feed with your team's | main communication or coordination channels. | tracker1 wrote: | I think what really and significantly curbed RSS usage what | Google reducing effective tooling (allowing you to see/subscribe | to RSS in the browser) combined with killing Google Reader. Of | course by that time, half my feeds were just links to the full | URL (ads and all). Then, they take the next step and introduce | AMP, which is really cool in a way, but effectively makes Google | the gateway to it all, and Google Ads especially. | | Google makes ad revenue, cuts out most of the sites themselves | and increases google value, while reducing the value of the | actual site producing the content. | aendruk wrote: | A timely observation. I've just been setting up the /feed command | for ops notifications in a local tech group's Matrix space. | mxuribe wrote: | I've been using a little matrix app of my own making that sends | notificatins to a specific matrix room when big jobs complete. | Its nothing fancy (and conceptually not different than slack | notifications), and sysadmins have been leveraging email for | the same exact purpose...but i like me some matrix...plus, said | same matrix room can be made to receive other/outside | notifications too; win-win! | baskethead wrote: | I've been using Blogtrottr to email me my RSS feeds for whatever | I'm following. It's run without any hiccups in I think over 10 | years. I have tons of feeds just emailing me every day and I skim | through them and read whatever I find interesting. It's really | awesome, much better for me than anything else. | lunaticman wrote: | I haven't heard about blogtrottr before, but landed on a | similar idea and built RSS-to-email service for myself and | opened it for others (https://briefcake.com). Mainly, I did it | to battle my pointless social network and doom scrolling | addictions -- and it worked amazingly. I spend less of my time | on internet, more of my time with kid. | | I'm slowly extending support for other social networks, to my | surprise, they are not that "social" and it's quite a pain to | scrape anything from them. | stevekemp wrote: | Yeah I also use a simple rss2email utility that I hacked | together. Having feeds in my mailbox means I can search/filter | and tag them appropriately. | | A lot of these online feed-readers have terrible UIs for | managing large numbers of feeds, but I guess they allow the | same benefit of keeping track of state (read vs. unread) that | email also offers. | dijonman2 wrote: | Fuck Slack.. and interrupt driven workflows. | amerine wrote: | All I see is people claiming RSS is dead, but I never stopped. | Moving between various readers and landed on Feedly for iOS a few | years ago. Love it. | jhot wrote: | Same. After Google Reader I went with Feedly for a while, then | self-hosted TTRSS, and currently self-hosted Miniflux. | Miniflutt is my preferred Android client and ReadKit on Mac. | The Miniflux web app is nice and simple but I prefer clients | that mark as read on scroll. | | I occasionally venture onto Reddit or HN to see if I've missed | anything big but rarely do. | soco wrote: | I use HN's RSS feed (plus a few others) with a Firefox | extension (Feedbro) and that's all I need. | yokoprime wrote: | NetNewsWire has been my goto last couple of years. It's | fantastic, and you cannot beat the price (free and open source) | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | I dropped Feedly because I found that 90%+ of my feeds would | only put the article title and the first sentence into the | feed, then require I click the URL to pull up the full article. | | It wasn't very fun constantly having to switch between my RSS | app and my browser, so I just stopped using it. | distrill wrote: | Yeah this really sucks. I think some do this for paywall | reasons, but there are definitely models out there to allow | in-reader paywall access. Stratechery has an interesting | approach - when you subscribe you get a unique feed that can | be cancelled when you stop paying. | babelfish wrote: | This is an issue with the site's RSS feed, not Feedly. Feedly | has an option to open any individual feeds posts in an in-app | browser directly (and if you're on iOS, even enable Reader | mode!) to combat this, so you don't need to switch apps! | pavel_lishin wrote: | It's not dead, but many things I wish supported RSS don't. | | Facebook. Twitter. Instagram. These would be incredibly useful | things to have native RSS feeds for, but instead I have to dig | around and either use some tool someone built for the purpose - | a tool at the mercy of the walled garden whose wall they're | peeking over - or build my own nightmare factory. | throw0101a wrote: | > _Twitter_ | | It used to; killed off ~2013: | | * https://brodiesnotes.blogspot.com/2013/06/twitter-has- | killed... | asdff wrote: | At the end of the day, leaning into RSS for me lead to me | leaning away from these sorts of services that don't support | RSS or make it difficult. | jrochkind1 wrote: | My dream is being able to get _only_ the events off my | Facebook feed. Invitations, events my "friends" are going to | that show up on my feed, events people post on their timeline | that would show up on my feed, whatever. | | If Facebook had any kind of API I could probably build this, | and stop using facebook otherwise. Which is probably why they | don't? | baskethead wrote: | None of those will because they rely on engagement to make | money. They need people logging into their servers so that | they can see what they are looking at. That's not how RSS | works, so of course they won't support it. | asdff wrote: | Some places that do offer rss only offer truncated feeds so | you actually have to open the website and be monetized and | fingerprinted. there are of course workarounds but its an | arms race with only a few maintainers. | FernandoMax wrote: | And I think this is the main reason Google Killed Google | Reader. It was controversial (or illegal or ugly) to put | ads over the third party content. And it was way better to | have Adsense on the websites directly. Such "spring | cleaning" was an alibi, not the reason. It was abandoned | after some attempts to build a kind of social network | inside, and probably they preferred people to create | content on +1 instead of on blogs. But Blogger still | exists, and there's a strong contradiction why to kill the | reader for the blogs except one: Ads. Google Reader was bad | for Ad business. And that's a big business in Google. And | terribly sad. | lapcat wrote: | They rely on ads to make money. Twitter could add ads to | their RSS feeds, just as they add ads to their app feeds. | RL_Quine wrote: | You can use RSS for twitter via Nitter, it works perfectly | for me. | pavel_lishin wrote: | > _instead I have to dig around and either use some tool | someone built for the purpose - a tool at the mercy of the | walled garden whose wall they 're peeking over_ | RL_Quine wrote: | I know, it sucks, but I'm saying what solution is solid | and works. | iroddis wrote: | +1 for Feedly, although I use Feedly Classic on IOS for a more | concise, no-frills UI. I really appreciate the header + summary | without thumbnails format for quickly going through large- | volume sources (like HN). | Eddy_Viscosity2 wrote: | Same. It was a major loss when Google killed Reader, but I just | found another app and kept on RSSing. NewsBlurr is my current | choice (windows). | seltzered_ wrote: | One thing that's been corrosive to rss the past couple years | have been podcast platforms. I find more podcasts (free ones) | that can only be accessed through platforms like Google | podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, or Anchor, with no rss feed link | to use in a platform agnostic podcatcher app. | AlexandrB wrote: | My policy is to just ignore these. There's so much content | out there it's not hard to find other (proper) podcasts to | listen to. | seltzered_ wrote: | Disagree on 'blaming the creator' argument. Not everyone is | aware of these technical philosophies and are focused on | getting a good story out there. Feel the same way about | social media. | PatreonLover89 wrote: | jrochkind1 wrote: | I have only noticed that on spotify, but, without a spotify | subscription, I hate it. I have had several podcasts I used | to listen to move to spotify-only. | | (I actually still listen to them on an Apple iPod nano....) | | I could believe it being true of some of other platforms, | trying to have "our-platform-only" content but I haven't seen | it and am not finding confirmation. I don't think it's true | of Google Podcasts, that they have any of their own content. | CharlesW wrote: | Unfortunately, to Spotify's great delight, the word "podcast" | has been successfully embraced, extended, and extinguished. | Us technical types have been complicit in it by allowing the | word "podcast" to mean audio shows on proprietary platforms | that require proprietary players. | thaumasiotes wrote: | The word never made much sense though. A "podcast" is a | file that you download from the internet. What's the point | of calling it a podcast? | giantrobot wrote: | Because it was broad _cast_ to your i _Pod_. Where iPod | means a non-networked personal media player which in the | 00s overwhelmingly meant an iPod. | | The distribution model was a client subscribes to the RSS | feed on their computer, downloads new episodes (from the | publisher's website), and then syncs them when the "iPod" | is synced to the computer. Many PMPs but the iPod | especially defaulted to syncing your computer library | when plugged in (to charge). So the iPod just received no | episodes of podcasts when people plugged them in to | charge at the end of the day. | | When iTunes added explicit podcast support it became even | easier to subscribe and sync podcasts. This was and | remains a good distribution model but Spotify et al have | done their damnedest to co-opt the term to mean content | exclusive to their platform. | jethro_tell wrote: | And yet here we are clicking a floppy disk icon to save | it. Language and meaning change over time. That's OK. | CharlesW wrote: | Of course it's okay for languages to evolve, but here's | how you're missing the point: | | Imagine that shortly after the turn of the century, Adobe | created a proprietary platform for delivering internet | content and called it the "web". Viewers must use Adobe | Web Reader to use Adobe "web pages", which are DRM- | protected PDF files delivered using proprietary | protocols. Adobe has done deals with several hundred | popular sites to turn off their standards-based websites | and deliver Adobe websites exclusively. | | This is what Spotify and others are doing, and nobody | cares. Apple is effectively the last media giant left | holding the flag for standards-based podcasting, but how | long do we think that will last? | throw0101a wrote: | Etymology of the _pod_ cast was from i _Pod_ , which was | (probably) the most popular audio/music device for a | number of years in the 2000s: | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast#Etymology | | There was a minor movement to label them "netcasts", but | it didn't really take. | scrame wrote: | Because it was some apple fanboys who started it with the | original iPod. Apple and a few others tried to trademark | it: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast#Trademark_applicati | ons | CharlesW wrote: | There's no point now, I suppose. | | The history was that "podcasting" was an open medium, | "open" being the point. A "podcast" was a show (e.g. | "Smartless"). "Episodes" were audio or video files | combined with metadata that lived in the podcast's RSS. | Anybody could play in that ecosystem. | | Now "podcasting" means anything/nothing. "Podcasts" are | shows. "Podcasts" are episodes. "Podcasts" are things | that increasingly need a proprietary app to play. | cxr wrote: | > Us technical types have been complicit in it by allowing | the word "podcast" to mean [...] | | Those types have done a lot of the same damage to the word | "wiki". It blows my mind that Sourcehut of all places is a | willing participant in debasing the term. | ronsor wrote: | What exactly is Sourcehut doing? | cxr wrote: | The same thing GitHub is doing: throwing a bunch of | source files into a repo--i.e. the sort of thing that | came _before_ wikis (and the reason why wikis were | invented in the first place--to displace those kinds of | systems)--but then calling _that_ a wiki. It qualifies | certainly as what GNU calls a "Massive Multiauthor | Collaboration Site". But to call it a "wiki" is wildly | inappropriate--like saying "integral" when you're talking | about derivatives:[1] | | > _Imagine you 're a mathematician, and fellow | mathematicians start calling derivatives integrals | instead; that's basically how badly the term[] is being | misused: it's being used to describe systems that are | almost the _exact opposite_ of the concept._ | | 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23672561 | pentagrama wrote: | Google Podcasts give you the RSS link of every podcast | https://imgur.com/a/bmgzCFb | seltzered_ wrote: | Thanks. Wow, did not notice that you have to click not the | globe button or share button, but the three dot 'hamburger' | button at the top right in order to see this. | cxr wrote: | Note that the Google Podcasts mobile app differs greatly | from the site at podcasts.google.com. When accessing Google | Podcasts through the latter, the feed URL is encoded in a | base-64 variant that you have to resort to extracting from | Google's show page URL and descrambling. If you want to | export your feed list, this can be tedious. (Made worse by | how top-heavy the Google Podcasts site is just to load a | page.) | Ajedi32 wrote: | > If you want to export your feed list, this can be | tedious | | Does Google Takeout support Google Podcasts? That'd be | the usual method of exporting everything from a Google | product. | cxr wrote: | > Does Google Takeout support Google Podcasts? | | Nope. One of the few use cases where I actually looked | towards Google Takeout as an escape hatch for my data, | instead of a mere novelty ("a ZIP of all my YouTube | interactions--that's neat, I guess"), but Google Podcasts | is not there. I've filed several complaints about this | and several other shortcomings in response to the Google | Podcasts app's spammy notifications requesting feedback. | | I ended up writing a short set of procedures to follow | (an SOP--written like a software manual, really) that | walks you through how to select page elements that are | shown on screen while logged in, and then drag and drop | them from the podcasts.google.com tab into the "export | tool". The punchline is that the export tool is just the | SOP document itself. It's meant to be read in your | browser, and it takes advantage of the fact that the | browser also happens to be a universal runtime... | | The exporter will descramble the links and output your | subscriptions in text/uri-list format. | Ajedi32 wrote: | That sounds useful; do you have that tool published | somewhere? | cxr wrote: | I got pretty carried away writing the thing as if it were | a mid-century technical repair manual for a piece of | industrial equipment, and never got around to publishing | it but here you go: <https://crussell.ichi.city/gpe.html> | | It could really stand to have an associated 90-second | video demonstration that walks through the steps because | of how unorthodox the the-documentation- _is_ -the- | implementation paradigm that I was experimenting with is. | tootie wrote: | RSS is still the default distribution system for podcasts. It's | probably the thin thread that is keeping Spotify from building | a walled garden for audio. | marcrosoft wrote: | I boycott all podcasts that are exclusive to Spotify because | I want to do my part in at least slowing down the eventual | podcast walled garden future. | ryukafalz wrote: | I also boycott them for a more practical reason: I can't | listen to them in my normal podcatchers! I'd have to switch | all my podcast listening to Spotify to change that, and | that's a pain. | jrochkind1 wrote: | Spotify has started and rapidly escalated a program to pay | podcast producers for spotify-only podcasts. (with no rss | feeds). Several podcasts I used to listen to and enjoy have | become spotify-only. | | When I recently asked friends for podcast suggestions... | several were spotify-only, i don't think the suggestors even | realized it, cause they just listened on spotify anyway | regardless. | | So I think Spotify agrees with you and is working on it... | adamrezich wrote: | Spotify is in fact intending to move away from RSS, as a | means of creating a walled garden: | https://techcrunch.com/2022/06/08/spotify-hypes-the- | revenue-... | | > [...] The company spent a good portion of its presentation | specifically focused on podcasts, which it said had been | "largely unchanged" for years before its entry into the | market, due to the limitations of RSS. | | > Spotify cited how unbundling podcasts from RSS technology | has paved the way for Spotify to generate revenue through | these popular audio programs -- a sentiment that's not | universally beloved by those who support an open podcast | ecosystem. Spotify has disrupted that market by bringing some | podcasts in-house, where they can only be heard on its | service, and competitors have followed. This has fractured | the ecosystem and left consumers at a disadvantage as some | shows are no longer broadly available. | | > "We've been able to replace RSS for on-platform | distribution, which means that podcasts created on our | platform are no longer held back by this outdated | technology," Maya Prohovnik, Spotify's head of Talk, told | investors. | CharlesW wrote: | Spotify has never used RSS, other than for Roach Motel- | style ingest. | | The plan was to embrace, extend, and extinguish the | podcasting medium, and the hard part of that is done. | "Podcasting" was a standards-based, open medium. Now it's | any audio show, and we've lost the unique name for the open | medium. As Spotify incentivizes more and more creators to | not publish an RSS feed, standards-based podcasting will | become a fond memory. | cxr wrote: | The entire framing of this (esp. re "unbundling") is pretty | gross. Unbundling is associated with disintermediation. | What Spotify is doing is the opposite. What organizational | dysfunction led to the circumstances here--where the | writers and editors of the linked article uncritically | publish and more or less legitimize this kind of shameless | corporate spin? | jrochkind1 wrote: | > What organizational dysfunction | | The whole article is pretty much just re-wording | Spotify's press release. | | There seem to be no sources in it except for Spotify's | press release. | | So, a very old form of organizational disfunction in | journalism: The cheapest and quickest way to write an | article is to use someone's press release as the only | source, as it doesn't actually require, well, any | journalism. | jokabrink wrote: | Maybe of interest: Even Youtube has RSS for channels. If your RSS | reader does not pick up the relevant tag, the URL is | https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=$ID with $ID | starting with `UC`, e.g. | https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UCVogAsA... | for "ARTE.tv documentaries". | zerop wrote: | Want to start a subthread here on what makes it great and despite | many attempts to kill it, it still rocks! My take | | 1. Widely adopted protocol, clients in all programming languages. | | 2. Publicly readable without password | | 3. Get notification for new items in many tools like Slack | | 4. Easy to produce and consume | | 5. Many nice Web UI Reader available | | <Add yours> | ascagnel_ wrote: | Not necessary, but nice: can be monetized in a healthy way via | things like API tokens. I have a few podcasts whose RSS feed | endpoints accept a unique, revocable token and check that | server-side -- but the client needs only the ability to pass | query params in the URL (which it should have anyways). It's a | great way for creators to get paid without imposing on their | users. | reaperducer wrote: | Can anyone recommend a good terminal-based RSS reader? Preferably | one that plays nice with small screens. | dewey wrote: | You could give https://newsboat.org a try, it's a fork of | Newsbeuter. I shared my Newsbeuter setup a long time ago here | (https://blog.notmyhostna.me/posts/using-newsbeuter-to- | read-y...) but have since moved on to https://miniflux.app and | Reeder (iPad OS, iOS, Mac). They all support the Google Reader | API so it makes using any client very easy. | mxuribe wrote: | I went in the oppositve direction of @dewey....i had a miniflux | instance, then moved to newsboat. It serves my need well | enough. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-18 23:00 UTC)