[HN Gopher] Are forum platforms dead? ___________________________________________________________________ Are forum platforms dead? Author : rosiesherry Score : 116 points Date : 2022-07-20 19:54 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (rosie.land) (TXT) w3m dump (rosie.land) | norwalkbear wrote: | Yes and honestly private groups are increasingly heavily probably | as a response to censors and scolds. | devonkim wrote: | SomethingAwful still keeps running along although site activity | is probably nowhere near its peak. But that may be better off | given the remaining users tend to offer higher signal to noise | ratio in post content and the members have mostly matured into | not being as horrible people for the most part. | travisgriggs wrote: | My personal preference (based on experience) for things like | software development questions/discussion has been | | Best: - Mailing lists/Slack/newsgroups back in the day | | Middle: - Stack Overflow, though it feels like traffic has gotten | less over the years. The orthodox moderators took over | | Worst: - Forums, whether syndicated like Discord or their own | proprietary thing (I'm looking at you Microchip, Atmel, and | STMicro) | | There have been exceptions. But that has been my experience. | tannhaeuser wrote: | Can confirm the depth and longevity of mailing lists compared | to classic forums and HN/Reddit with sometimes week-long | threads if not necessarily with daily or more frequent cadence | which also works wonders for quality. Think open-ended | discussions and responses without time pressure but with good | quotes and references rather than "quick wins", memes, and | barely hidden intents of manipulation which is also a thing on | HN. Also, the option of PMing. | | Mailing lists should be used more again, they've become | somewhat out of fashion for no good reason. | eximius wrote: | In my experience, yes, and Discord ate them. | | I dearly miss phpBB style forums. (I strongly dislike Discourse, | somehow, despite being the only modern spiritual successor.) | TulliusCicero wrote: | I wouldn't be surprised if Discord eventually did a message | board in its client. There's a fairly natural outgrowth there. | trinovantes wrote: | It's actually a new feature being tested right now | | https://support.discord.com/hc/en- | us/articles/6208479917079-... | tester756 wrote: | >I dearly miss phpBB style forums. (I strongly dislike | Discourse, somehow, despite being the only modern spiritual | successor.) | | For me its layout. I prefer phpBB layout | amatecha wrote: | I notice a lot of forums are being bought up by companies who | then convert the forum to their own forum software/platform so | they can serve ads and sell products to the "captive audience". | For example, VerticalScope[0] who use nice euphemistic PR | language like "enabling the world to share expertise and discover | knowledge on subjects they love", which actually means "we buy | thriving forums so we can sell advertising on them". According to | their own site, they have 1200+ forums. Pretty disappointing, but | the commercialization and monetary exploitation of the internet | knows no bounds. | | I love the testimonials on one page[1] where they market to | businesses: "By utilizing the VerticalScope network of sites, we | are able to engage with enthusiasts and position our business as | a contributor in order to better understand our customers, | improve products and service, and build brand awareness." | | One thing I'm really curious is how much the payout is for forum | admins who sell their community to businesses like this. I'm | basically not really willing to participate in forums anymore | because this (or a domain squat) appears to be the ultimate | destination of the overwhelming majority of them. Well, that and | their likelihood of becoming an avenue for adware/malware | distribution since they get hacked constantly. :P | | Oh, it turns out VerticalScope isn't immune to the "getting | hacked" issue, either, as some 45 million accounts were | compromised a while back[2]. Now a whole different type of | business can "engage with enthusiasts", it seems. | | On the upside, it appears their UI has improved greatly since | they first started buying up forums. Initially the usability was | pretty poor IMO, but now is fairly acceptable. | | [0] https://www.verticalscope.com/ | | [1] https://www.suzuki-forums.com/business/ | | [2] https://krebsonsecurity.com/2017/11/2nd-breach-at- | verticalsc... | JoshCole wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline... | coding123 wrote: | There's a big difference between forums where a few hundred to | maybe 1000 people will see your content and social media | platforms that "bubble up" popular content so that millions of | people see it: Only loud mouths get the microphone in social | media and calm "normal people" get the microphone in smaller | forums. | | Also forums are perfect for simple things like "Which nails do | you recommend for siding: x or y?" You can't really get that | answered in Twitter. I mean I get that people ask the same thing | or one of the Stack Exchange sites - but there's no sense of | "community" so instead of trusting Awesome Bob who's a veteran | builder of 15 years your simply trusting the answer with the most | upvotes. I mean I get it - that's the platform that gets us away | from trusting AwesomeBob forever. | | But that also takes away that "cohesive" single source of truth | that we're looking for in the big picture (building a home for | this example) where AwesomeBob recommends a series of things that | works together. | | In the stack exchange model you're just getting the top | recommended things for each category but it's also wrong for | different areas. Like the kind of siding we'd use in California | may not be appropriate in other areas of the country (OK bad | example - everyone should use James Hardie or LP Smart Side). | post_break wrote: | Subreddits have taken over, but car forums are still thriving. | zwieback wrote: | came here to say that. Always use forums for repair advice. | rosiesherry wrote: | Do you have any examples? | tmh88j wrote: | https://www.gtrlife.com/forums/ | | https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/ | | https://www.camaro6.com/forums/ | | https://rennlist.com/forums/ | | Most car related subreddits are used like instagram or news | aggregators with very little substance you can't easily find | elsewhere. | post_break wrote: | Sure, almost any new car platform will have a forum. 6G | mustang, Fiesta ST, Focus ST, Honda accord. | | https://www.fiestastforum.com/ | | https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/ | | Almost every new generation of car will either get a new | forum website, or added forum group. Fun fact, a lot of these | are owned by one company. There is also tapatalk which | charges money for access. | stilldavid wrote: | I believe VW Vortex[0] is (or at least was) the largest forum | by number of users. I have a Tacoma and receive dozens of | replies on Tacoma World[1], usually within an hour, on posts | I've made with questions or comments about the vehicle. I'm | sure there are more. | | 0: https://www.vwvortex.com/ | | 1: https://www.tacomaworld.com/ | aeyes wrote: | https://honda-tech.com/forums/ | | https://www.m5board.com/forums/ | drusepth wrote: | Forums for authors/writing also seem to be thriving, | interestingly enough. | reaperducer wrote: | The whole "forums are dead" thing must be news to all of the | various forums I visit regularly which are thriving. | | Examples: | | https://atariage.com/forums/index.php | | https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php | tannhaeuser wrote: | Wish that were true, but sadly forums went down with ad prices | racing to the bottom around 2005 when forum pages became | plastered with more and more ads to compete against targeted | advertising. Also news aggregators including HN and Reddit did | play a role in their demise. | reaperducer wrote: | Both of the forms I linked to have no advertising. | nickt wrote: | Wow, "CBM PET 2001 Strange Boot" with almost 2000 responses | (100 pages) since April this year. | | https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/cbm-2001-pet-stran... | alex_young wrote: | Is HN a forum? What about Reddit? Facebook? | | Seems like the distinction between "forum" and "social media" is | mostly about user count. Forums are pretty healthy if you draw | that line in some reasonable location IMO. | detaro wrote: | Personally, I'd say Reddit and HN aren't forums because of the | enforced time-limited nature of discussions. | nomel wrote: | I rarely see forums that don't automatically lock old | discussions, to prevent necromancy. | tester756 wrote: | But it doesn't happen as fast as it does on HN. | | Once something drops from HN's front page - 12 hours? 24 | hours? 36 hours if it is really huge | | then it's dead. | detaro wrote: | but they need to have died for that. I know plenty forums | that have threads that are running for months or years - | because they've never gone for _$threshold_ weeks without a | post. (and in general I tend to think locking after time is | bad anyways, or at least should be able to be overridden) | | Whereas even within the days where it is still possible, | you are not going to see "oh, this HN/Reddit discussion | from last week is still active" because it doesnt get | ranked anywhere based on that. | grumbel wrote: | The difference between "forum" and "social media" is how posts | are sorted and displayed. | | HN and Reddit are focused on news, the newest stuff goes to the | top and disappears after a day or two. | | Forums on the other side focus on topics. Threads with on going | discussions go to the top. They never disappear, as soon as | somebody makes a new post into a thread it goes back to the | top. | | This means you can end up with extremely in depth and long | ongoing discussions on forums that you'll never find on social | media. It wasn't unusual to find threads on IMDB forums that | spanned literally decades. Meanwhile on Reddit everything gets | locked from any further participation after six months and | becomes impossible to find after just a few days. | easrng wrote: | I'm pretty sure Reddit stopped locking posts by default. | erulabs wrote: | I'm really excited for https://www.forem.com/ - when I get some | free time I plan on making it easier to setup for beginners. | PHPBB was "self-hosted" - the old world of the internet was | entirely "self-hosted". We can return again, to the old internet, | anew. Everything old is new again! | mdm12 wrote: | Now if we can only convince VCs that 'web3' really means 'we | host the servers again' and not that other nonsense. | erulabs wrote: | Hah I work on this every single day. I'm building tiny web- | servers for consumers over at https://pibox.io - we like to | say were "distributing the web; no blockchain required". | Customers love the product, but VCs _hate_ it xD | mdm12 wrote: | Good on you for taking the road less traveled! I don't have | the guts to pursue 'real' entrepreneurship like yourself, | but I appreciate those who do! | simjnd wrote: | This is awesome. Seeing the mention of an App Store made me | think of Umbrel [1] which is still in alpha but is a very | approachable GUI for managing services running on your | Raspberry. | | [1]: https://umbrel.com/ | erulabs wrote: | Nice! We consider Umbrel a bit of a sister company :) | They are more crypto focused, and we're more self-hosting | focused, but we overlap in many ways. Umbrel software | runs great on our hardware! | spaniard89277 wrote: | Flarum is worth checking too. | simjnd wrote: | Came here to say this Discourse [1] seems to be everywhere | but I like Flarum [2] a lot, seems to be a little bit closer | to the phpBB spirit. Both are OSS and self-hostable. | | [1]: https://meta.discourse.org/ | | [2]: https://discuss.flarum.org/ | beefman wrote: | I don't know about dead, but they've been in decline since 2013. | The U.S. Presidential election in 2016 accelerated it. Most news | outlets killed their comments sections around this time.[1] | | It's certainly less fun to discuss things if you're liable to get | into an argument. And arguments degrade the readability of | discussions for others. | | The transition to mobile phones certainly could be a factor, and | the related Eternal September concept.[2] | | The increase in monetization is a factor, since advertiers don't | want to be associated with objectionable comments. | | I think comment voting, though it has some benefits, is | ultimately pretty toxic as well. | | But all these are proximal causes. This is a long-term cultural | trend affecting forums, wikipedia contributions, office politics, | and everything else. Anthropologists would say political | fractionalization is increasing. People increasingly don't want | to collaborate with those they disagree with on an expanding list | of isuses. | | But even this is a proximal cause. What drives political | fractionalization? What drives culture to be increasingly | morbid?[3] I think the fundamental cause is that the energy | gradient powering civilization is in decline. It's a Peak Oil | -type idea, but focused on EROI instead of oil production.[4][5] | | In their heyday, forums were amazing.[6] | | [1] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comments_section#Closing_of_co... | | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September | | [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32166902 | | [4] https://twitter.com/clumma/status/593890418028253185 | | [5] | https://gist.github.com/clumma/4c5016f808adde034a575f1dd7d40... | | [6] https://twitter.com/clumma/status/1538934712743231488 | balentio wrote: | Let's be honest here. It's not "disagreement" that's the | problem as such. It's if you disagree with the established | narrative, or don't take the vax, or whatever else is in vogue | you might be fired and get "icky juice on you" by being in | proximity to someone who didn't drink the kool-aid. | beefman wrote: | There's no question that we've seen some sort of Great | Awakening, with politics becoming a de novo religion, and | that this activity is almost entirely concentrated on the | left (perhaps because of greater competition from established | religions on the right). | swozey wrote: | I'm personally sick of making logins to things and the hurdles | you have to go through to join some Forums. Verify this, verify | that, read a rules post, yadda yadda, can't share images because | your friend needs an account too. | | It's a time investment. There was a point once where I must've | had 20-30+ accounts to different forums and I'm reminded of them | each birthday. | | Then the general lack of instantaneous responses like I almost | always get on reddit, etc. | | I only use one nowadays, and it's an automobile forum I couldn't | get anywhere else. | hammock wrote: | >I'm personally sick of making logins to things and the hurdles | you have to go through to join some Forums. Verify this, verify | that, read a rules post, yadda yadda, can't share images | because your friend needs an account too. | | That's how I feel about discord | reaperducer wrote: | _I 'm personally sick of making logins to things and the | hurdles you have to go through to join some Forums._ | | A lot of the forums I visit allow you to instantly sign-up and | log in with Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple, just like any | other service. | | You may get your first ten posts previewed before they go live, | but that's a minor inconvenience for keeping spam down. | | _It 's a time investment._ | | If you're not willing to put in the very minor time investment, | then you probably don't have much to contribute to the | community, and it's better off for everyone if you remain a | lurker, anyway. | bnralt wrote: | > If you're not willing to put in the very minor time | investment, then you probably don't have much to contribute | to the community, and it's better off for everyone if you | remain a lurker, anyway. | | Yeah, I think friction actually makes some things better, | since it weeds out the most disinterested individuals and | shows the people involved have some desire beyond immediate | gratification. | | Birthdays are a good example of this - in the past, someone | who e-mailed you to wish you happy birthday was someone who | had decided that you were important enough to them that | they'd remember you're day of birth. The act meant something. | But with Facebook, everyone gets sent a notification that | it's someone's birthday, and many will send birthday wishes | no matter how close they feel they are to the person. You | come across profiles where it's obvious someone stopped using | Facebook years ago, but every year on their birthday the same | few people respond to a birthday notification and wish them a | happy birthday, oblivious to the fact that they're no longer | there. | | The interesting thing is, introducing an inferior option that | has less friction often causes most people who used to be OK | with the friction to now decide that it's too much of a | hassle. Hence forums might be better, but people who used to | use them will now opt for a worse Reddit sub if it's easier. | Once Facebook started notifying people of birthdays, most | people stopped trying to remember birthdays of people who | weren't immediately around them even if those birthdays | weren't listed on Facebook. | | I've read before that small changes in the friction in our | environment can have big impacts on our behavior. It's | interesting to see this in play, especially with many people | choosing convenience over quality. | foresto wrote: | > If you're not willing to put in the very minor time | investment, | | The time investment only seems minor if you view it in | isolation. I probably have hundreds of forum accounts | scattered about the web, and at this point, every additional | signup feels like such a nuisance that I seldom bother any | more. Too many paper cuts. (Especially when it comes time to | update my email address.) | | > then you probably don't have much to contribute to the | community, | | That logic breaks down when considering people who contribute | high quality in low quantity. For example, when I go down a | rabbit hole to solve a tricky problem, I might want to share | the solution where others who need it are likely look for it. | Sometimes that means a single post on a forum. Signup | friction makes me less likely to share. | KajMagnus wrote: | > If you're not willing to put in the very minor time | investment, then you probably don't have much to contribute | to the community, | | Sometimes the person wants to post a reply to help someone | else, | | and then a minor time investment can be a big hurdle? So the | people in the forum gets less help -- they get help only from | people who _themselves_ are wondering about something, and so | are willing to spend the time to sign up? | | I think it'd be nice with global identities that worked | across all forums. And one could have many, per person. One | for work, one for a hobby, another for another... | layer8 wrote: | The point of forums is that it shouldn't be random | strangers posting once only after they found some thread or | post in a Google search result. It's intended for topics | that you want to follow regularly. | seydor wrote: | Reddit is a single forum though, the same themes and banality | on every subreddit, even same moderators. A community needs a | bubble to grow in sophistication, and subreddits are too | porous. | | Something like Mozilla Persona, easy login tied to an email, | was the best solution imho | throwaway894345 wrote: | I largely agree. Individual subreddits can have different | cultures, but there's always a much larger degree of snide, | low-quality posts than there are on most traditional forums | (or here on HN, for that matter). Almost all subreddits' | quality hovers in the Twitter range. I think this is mostly | because anyone can join any subreddit with ease, so even the | best moderators have to fight against a vast tide of | newcomers pulling the culture toward the Reddit average. | ryukafalz wrote: | I feel like the redesign has blurred some of the boundaries | between subreddits as well. On old Reddit subreddits were | able to heavily customize the look, which made them feel | more like their own separate spaces. Post-redesign, not so | much. | throwaway894345 wrote: | Interesting, I hadn't considered that dynamic. | PaulHoule wrote: | I find it often takes a few days to get a reply on forums but | it is better than the heat death of Reddit. | | That birthday thing is pretty annoying though. | jsemrau wrote: | What is the "heat death" of Reddit? | aquaduck wrote: | I assume "heat death" most likely refers to the noisy | ("high-entropy") backdrop of shitposts. | PaulHoule wrote: | Image memes. | | I left proggit as soon as I discovered Hacker News | because on proggit the people just can't accept that | somebody somewhere might be motivated to program, at | least partially, by the money. I went through a phase | where Leon Trotsky was my hero but I still think of the | people at proggit as "communists". | Hamuko wrote: | > _That birthday thing is pretty annoying though._ | | It's nice that someone remembers, even if it's a PHP script. | the_third_wave wrote: | The birthday thing is a new years salutation thing for me - | which is not my birthday - and not that annoying. Many | administrators will wonder about that centenarian who | frequents the forums, grandpa really kept with the times it | seems. In other words I never feed these things real data, | why should I? | | While I can see some of the annoyances with distributed | forums I'm willing to live with these to keep the 'net | decentralised. | | _Nae lairds, nae kings, we are free men!_ | jsemrau wrote: | I never found that different logins for different sites had | been a problem. Passwords saved in browser made this quite | easy. Yes, across devices that is a bit hard, but there are | ways around this as well. | layer8 wrote: | Forums are best for long-form long-term discussions, and they | are the only suitable medium for that, apart from mailing lists | (and formerly Usenet). The most essential feature for that, | besides being able to comfortably display longer posts in | context, is to be able to track which portions of which threads | you have already read. The ideal is to be able to track read | status by individual post, but only email and news (Usenet) | clients offer that granularity (and it effectively requires | keyboard navigation between posts). | | The lack of read status support is also why the HN interface is | only suitable for short discussions. | | Instantaneous responses lead to chat-like communication, which | is a whole different thing. There's Discord, Reddit, IRC and | the like for that. | haunter wrote: | > able to track which portions of which threads you have | already read | | reddit has this feature too for premium users. Works with | every single thread regardless the amount of comments | alexjplant wrote: | The barrier to entry is a feature, not a bug. It discourages | karma farming and low-quality responses that pervade a site | like Reddit where a single account grants access to millions of | communities on a whim. | | That being said I also find it infuriating when I click a | thumbnail in a forum post and get asked to authenticate. The | image is already visible so as far as I'm concerned it's | nothing more than a grab for additional user signups. | dylan604 wrote: | >That being said I also find it infuriating when I click a | thumbnail in a forum post and get asked to authenticate. | Because the image is already visible it's nothing more than a | grab for additional user signups. | | This is where I smash ctrl-alt-i and go get what I wanted | their modals be damned! | dceddia wrote: | > nothing more than a grab for additional user signups. | | I think this is a holdover from the olden days when image | hosting (and bandwidth) was expensive, hotlinking images was | very much a faux pas, etc. Or maybe I just wasn't aware of | "the game" back then, but I truly don't remember getting the | feeling that forums were trying to juice signup numbers by | holding images hostage. When I see that, I think "ugh, get | with the times" more than "ugh, another site trying to get my | email". | | That said, I fully agree that it is super frustrating, and I | wish they'd turn it off. | | It's also meta-interesting how the _meaning_ of requiring a | signup feels like it has changed. Again, could just be me, | but I definitely see "signup required" these days as a grab | for data (really, more of a benefit for the operator than the | user), whereas in the golden days of forums, it didn't feel | like there was spammy intent behind it (and it felt more like | a true benefit for the user). | wvenable wrote: | > The barrier to entry is a feature, not a bug. | | Are you saying the people with enough time to jump through | all these hoops are the high-quality people? That doesn't | jive with my experience. | alexjplant wrote: | I'm saying that the people that are liable to create an | octuply-nested low-effort comment referencing nothing more | than a Thanos snap, Rick Astley, "yikes", "oof", etc. | aren't likely to spend the three minutes required to create | an account on a forum. | | Forums are more insular by nature and have a separate set | of cultural problems, but consistently ultra-low-quality | posts isn't one of them in my experience. | PaulHoule wrote: | They are a place to go when you want to learn something or get | help with a problem. It's refreshing you get to hear something | other than "Me too" and "I'm outraged!". | ufmace wrote: | Seems to me they're alive and well. The increasingly powerful | censorship forces on places like Reddit has moved at least dozens | of communities to create independent platforms for themselves | with a variety of codebases. Yes, some of the oldest and worst- | maintained ones have died, but many others are still as active as | they ever were. | | There's also a thing where communities tend to only really | migrate to other forum-types that work similarly. Between | Reddit/HN style nested threads with voting, classic PHPBB style | strictly chronological threads, and Slack/Discord live chat with | many channels, good luck getting a significant number of people | on one platform type to move to a community on a different | platform type. A different software package that provides a | matching platform type is a much easier sell. | jorvi wrote: | It still blows my mind that I got a multi-day suspension for | calling out a pretty obvious Russian shill and calling him a | moron. He's still posting, btw. | gambiting wrote: | I mean, it's not like smaller forums didn't have an issue | with power hungry moderators who would ban you completely for | stupidest things. The same people are now subreddit | moderators. This isn't really a problem with reddit. | ufmace wrote: | That's not what I'm talking about though. Forum bans and | subreddit bans are small change. What really makes people | move platforms is when the Reddit admins nuke entire | subreddits for dubious reasons, including breaking poorly | defined rules. And admins deleting posts that follow the | rules of their subreddit and completely banning accounts | for various reasons. | WaxProlix wrote: | What sorts of subreddits have been nuked for dubious | reasons? I know admins have been abusive of privilege in | the past but it seems pretty small- to normal-sized- | potatoes as forum admin ego tripping goes. | Sohcahtoa82 wrote: | A lot of people think /r/The_Donald was banned for | dubious reasons. | thrown_22 wrote: | Yes, this isn't new either. | | The advice given to IRC admins was always "don't post in | your own channels". | | There are plenty of irc channels and forums administrated | even worse than reddit. | noasaservice wrote: | > This isn't really a problem with reddit. | | YES it is. Reddit empowers fascist types to run their | fiefdoms, UNTIL the liliputian leaders start running *too | many* users away. | | It's all about users per day engagement. If you harm that, | the reddit admins show up and clean house. But in the | interim, they'll _let_ you think you own that subreddit. | gambiting wrote: | And if you were a mod of a smaller forum that relied on | ads to stay afloat, what exactly would happen if you | started banning loads of people? It's the same thing, | different name. | ls15 wrote: | I think OP was referring to a site-wide ban that only | admins can issue. | tcmart14 wrote: | Yea, that is the part of the equation people forget. They | see a ban and big platform and thing those things are only | happening on big platforms owned by big corporate people in | shiny offices. Nope, censorship can happen in small | communities ran by Billy Bob down the street to. It comes | down more to people. If someone wants an echo chamber, they | will create an echo chamber regardless if it is a subreddit | or a MyBB instance on a shared hosting plan. | dylan604 wrote: | It was much more fun to kick people out of a channel in IRC | dvtrn wrote: | I forget the name of it now, but back when I was still in | irc regularly, I used a client that would hilariously | play an explosion sound effect whenever someone got | kicked. | | Made for amusing chuckles to hear it in the background | whilst working and wondering "wonder who just got the | hammer" | spacemanmatt wrote: | if you were a real chump you'd kickban them then teardr0p | them | TeeMassive wrote: | On the other side of the medal, my native language is French | and I got banned due to me being a "Russian operative" | ls15 wrote: | Because you are not supposed to attack other redditors. | Reddit Content Policy - Rule 1 Remember the | human. Reddit is a place for creating community and | belonging, not for attacking marginalized or vulnerable | groups of people. Everyone has a right to use Reddit free of | harassment, bullying, and threats of violence. Communities | and users that incite violence or that promote hate based on | identity or vulnerability will be banned. | bcrosby95 wrote: | This reads like you're allowed to attack people if they | aren't part of a marginalized or vulnerable group of | people. | kodah wrote: | The accepted definition of marginalized groups is | actually rather large: https://www.mnpsych.org/index.php? | option=com_dailyplanetblog... | | The wording in this rule is probably not great. There is | a difference in promoting, "Be nice to everyone, but pay | special attention where you may have a gap with | marginalized folks experience" and how this rule reads. | I'm not sure that there's a difference in outcomes | though. | thrown_22 wrote: | The wording is terrible because it needs to justify | terrible decisions. | | I got banned for posting about the plight of Copts in | Egypt. That was Islamophobia somehow. | | Apparently caring about a Christian minority whose | children are routinely kidnapped and raped by a Muslim | majority is racism. And people wonder why groomer is the | go to description of rainbow allies. | kodah wrote: | Depends on the context that it's brought up in. If you're | just interjecting that fact, then yeah, I could see that | being perceived as islamaphobia. That view is consistent, | when a person from gender x is expressing their | experience, and gender y comes along to add on that | "gender x does it too" the outcome is similar, and vice | versa. These are new-ish social standards, but I think | reasonable if you're trying to create a space where | _everyone_ has the opportunity to share while staying | topic focused in a thread. I can also see why it 's | potentially confusing for unknowing participants. | | Edit: just noticed your reply includes the term "rainbow | allies" so I think we're done here. | thrown_22 wrote: | >That view is consistent, when a person from gender x is | expressing their experience, and gender y comes along to | add on that "gender x does it too" the outcome is | similar, and vice versa. | | Is there anything more to say than "OK groomer" at this | point? | | You're literally saying that we shouldn't talk about the | pandemic of child rape in the Muslim world (and immigrant | communities) because KKK. | | What's next? We can't talk about the gas chambers because | of the Dresden fire bombings? | kodah wrote: | ehhh, that's not what I said, and I find it a bit odd | that you immediately reached for calling me a "groomer". | Let me try to be a little more clear: | | If you're showing up to a conversation that has no | relation to the issue you described other than the fact | that people are discussing Islam _and_ you interject that | so as to throw a topic off track, yes I can understand | why they see it that way. | | If you're showing up to a conversation regarding religion | and child sexual exploitation and you mention that, then | no I cannot understand why they see it that way. | | That's a, generally, new-ish social standard so I was | trying to give you, and them, some benefit of the doubt, | but I think at this point I kind of get why you were | banned. | thrown_22 wrote: | It was a conversation about the treatment of refugees | from Ukraine vs the Middle East. | | One is majority women and children, the other is men who | engaged in such interesting behaviour as mass rapes to | celebrate Christmas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E | 2%80%9316_New_Year%27s_E... | | That you need to argue in bad faith to cover for | pedophiles, groomers and rapists makes you no better than | them. That you claim the moral high-ground while doing it | makes you worse. | thrown_22 wrote: | I love how they changed the original first rule of Reddit: | | >Remember the human. When you communicate online, all you | see is a computer screen. When talking to someone you might | want to ask yourself "Would I say it to the person's face?" | or "Would I get jumped if I said this to a buddy?" | | The new rule is there to allow two minutes hate against | anyone who is against the current thing. | [deleted] | cowtools wrote: | Being insulted is an "attack"? | ls15 wrote: | _Insult_ a synonym for _verbal attack_ | cowtools wrote: | So it is unacceptable now to merely insult other users? | | You can act coy about the meaning of this, but the usage | of such language is obvious. It is trying to compare a | voluntary public exchange between anonymous internet | users to acts of physical violence. | | The usage of that word there is essentially an | underhanded attempt at justifying future censorship | through its ambiguous meaning. When moderators agree with | the "attacked" the message becomes a bannable offense, | but when moderators agree with the "attacker" the message | becomes "fair criticism". | jfengel wrote: | Yes. It is unacceptable now to merely insult other users, | on their platform. As well as this one. | cowtools wrote: | Whose platform is it? It's the users that make the forum | valuable. Anyone can administrate a web forum. The | individuals and communities should decide what speech is | acceptable for them, not some unaccountable bureaucrats. | | I think there is a time and place for insults and | flamewars. Maybe not everywhere all the time, but what | you are seeing on the web today is selective enforcement | of "politeness" and "civility" rules to benefit whatever | side of the "flamewar" that the moderators approve of. | | HN is a good forum insofar as the users think that admins | enforce reasonable rules and users agree to abide by | those rules and not evade bans. On HN, moderation is | rather sophisticated and neutral. When that changes I'll | leave. | ls15 wrote: | > Whose platform is it? It's the users that make the | forum valuable. | | It's the user's community and content, but Reddit Inc's | platform. | balentio wrote: | Unless that Redditor's name is Seth Rich, then you can get | away with murder. | datalopers wrote: | Which subreddit? Each sub has different mods | onionisafruit wrote: | It sounds like you called somebody a moron for having a | different POV from you. | colpabar wrote: | What was obvious about it? In my experience, a lot of people | seem to think that anyone with a different opinion than their | own must be a russian operative. | tmaly wrote: | I wish we would just resurrect usenet newsgroups. I like the | idea of open protocols | e40 wrote: | Ah, yes, the place where trolls had free reign. | comp.lang.lisp is a good example. Xah Lee and others. It was | just too much, so I had to stop reading it. | | There were other newsgroups that had serious trolls, too. | tux1968 wrote: | Isn't it easier than ever to filter such comments yourself? | If it isn't, it should be. That lets everyone speak, allow | researches and other interested parties to look at the | entire spectrum of discourse, and for each of us to | maintain our focus and sanity as well. | InitialLastName wrote: | I had to unsubscribe from sci.electronics.design; the | s**posting over politics out-massed the electronics design | discussion 100:1 (and wasn't even entertaining, just the | same 3 people blowing each other up). | palebluedot wrote: | That actually sounds pretty ideal. Add 3 people to your | killfile, and you've removed most of the noise! | slyall wrote: | That was the problem. The regulars had killfiles to | filter out the problem users and topics but somebody new | just saw lots of junk (and if they posted the trolls | would be the first to reply). | | Thus nobody new joined the groups and they stagnated. | | I quit Usenet 20 years ago and if I look at them now some | of those same trolls are still around. Or they have | migrated to facebook/twitter. | snickerbockers wrote: | xah lee might be a troll but at least he did a good job | documenting emacs lisp on his website. i've learned more | from him than i ever did from the official emacs manual (by | which i mean <C-h r>). | hkt wrote: | Content moderation on usenet was and still is an unsolved | problem. Fediverse stuff is a bit saner as it has more | controls available, albeit is less forum-like | hhh wrote: | Yes, Discord and Reddit won. | Findecanor wrote: | I think forum platforms are still the best type of web site for | communities that need to communicate in the long term, i.e. where | information does not get stale quickly. | | For instance, in building-hobby/crafting forums, people post | threads about their ongoing projects, which sometimes may take | years to complete. | | In some collecting forums, there are threads that are over a | decade old -- and still active, each with a wealth of information | about one very specific subject. Disagreements about details | about a specific type of item means that there is sometimes a lot | of info that can't always be easily collected into a wiki. | | However, these forums are dependent on there being a good search | function: When they breaks down, people do complain. It is also | not suitable to automatically lock/cull old threads on these | forums. | a4isms wrote: | The most useful "social media" sites for musicians are fairly | vanilla forums. Heavily moderated, single well-understood | focus, &c. &c. | | Example: https://talkbass.com is for people to talk about | playing bass. And as you suggest for crafting, there are lots | of old posts that are valuable today. For example, bowing | (arco) technique on double bass. | tester756 wrote: | Indeed, forums are the way to go if you value deep, long | discussions. | | If you want to write 2-3 comments and then thread dies, then | Reddit/HM/Discord/FB Groups | krapp wrote: | Which makes it odd that HN, a forum ostensibly _all about_ | deep, intellectual discussions, has so many features that | seem designed to suppress discourse at length, due to the | fear of entropy leading to the Eternal September effect. | alkonaut wrote: | Forums are almost irreplaceable. You can't replace a product | support forum or a sports team fan forum with something | tangential but completely different like a discord, Facebook page | or similar. | | Discourse is so great these days that it should be the default | choice for anyone needing a forum, and luckily it seems it is | too. | 0wx wrote: | If they didn't has discord/slack/reddit, it's not worth joining. | Cyberdog wrote: | Then why did you join HN? | josteink wrote: | > If they didn't has discord/slack/reddit, it's not worth | joining. | | Different folks, different strokes I guess. | | If I see a "community" require Slack or Discord, it instantly | gives me bad vibes, and I'm almost guaranteed not to join or | visit. | PaulHoule wrote: | Discord? I dread "subscribe to my discord". The average discord | seems to have 780 rooms but only 3 people logged in, they are | kinda like zombies except that the word "brains" has 5 letters | too many for them to handle. | joemi wrote: | Not only that but there seems to be a MUCH worse signal-to- | noise ratio in every discord I've ever seen (when compared to | forums), due to the more chat-like nature of the platform. | geekbird wrote: | Seriously. One discord that I am unfortunately on has one | person who just drivels on and on and on. But I can't mute | him, and he does this even on channels that are the whole | reason that I bother with it. Apparently there is little or | no moderation possible, so everyone has to put up with his | train of though word vomit. | theshrike79 wrote: | Ironically the same thing used to be true for forums :) | | Someone really enthusiastically started a forum, added 420 | different sub-areas and sub-forums. All of which have a | maximum of 1-10 posts. Most of them by the forum admin. | freeflight wrote: | The platforms are not dead, but the etiquette that mostly defined | them is very much dead, very similar to the Eternal September, | thanks to social media style engagement creeping its way into | everything. | | Reddit is a good example for this; It has all the functionality | to write well formatted posts, with no character limit, and easy | insertion of links. | | But how many Reddit users actually make use of that functionality | to that full extend? Only a minority, and for that they often get | told to _" Cut down on the wall of text/gish gallop"_ because | anything that's longer than a Tweet is nowadays considered | something bad. | | A huge factor for that his how most people nowadays browse the | web; On their phone, which does not lend itself well to read or | write long-style text content, so most Reddit comments boil down | to 1-2 sentence jokes and other random emotional garbage based on | ad hominem because everything is about them dopamine kick | upvotes. | davesque wrote: | The thing I really miss about traditional forums is the _lack_ of | the up /down-voting feature. I think in a way it sometimes worked | better when posts naturally bubbled to the top that simply had | more active discussion. And if you _really_ cared about a topic | being addressed, you could just _bump_ it. I think the basic | difference with up /down-voting is that unpopular topics couldn't | be squelched as easily. I also suspect that, when there was no | visible "approval" score from the up/down-votes, people would | tend to approach discussions with more of an open mind. Of | course, it was probably the case that this sort of style worked | much better with smaller scale communities. For example, the | bumping behavior could easily be abused by bad actors if the | community moderator didn't have enough bandwidth. | benbristow wrote: | I wouldn't have thought so. Plenty forums I visit on a | daily/weekly basis. | | The football team I support have an unofficial fan forum which | still runs on an antiquated (but maintained) Perl based e-Blah | system and is very active. | | A few others include RailForums (https://railforums.co.uk/) which | runs on more modern forum software and the Monzo Community | (https://community.monzo.com/) | | Isn't Hacker News technically a forum too, just a bit more | bespoke & for lack of better words, reddit-y? | Jamie9912 wrote: | I feel like Forums are dying because most forum platforms SUCK. | Full of whitespace. | | Discourse must be the nicest forum platform out there because of | single-page scrolling, like-feature, and solution feature | kitsunesoba wrote: | Discourse is nice in some ways but it's also annoying for its | general slowness and the way it breaks native browser features | like Find in Page. | joemi wrote: | Not being able to use the native browser find in page in a | Discourse forum is my single biggest complaint about my | otherwise glowing experience with the platform. I wouldn't | mind it as much if it at least tried to emulate the typical | native find in page experience, but it doesn't work that way | unfortunately. | zerocrates wrote: | I seem to recall that if you hit Ctrl-F again you get the | regular native find-in-page, don't you? | | Or do you mean that because of the dynamic nature of the | page, browser find doesn't really work especially well | sometimes? That's probably not super-meaningfully different | than the classic forum setup where what you're looking for | may be on a different page altogether. | theshrike79 wrote: | Discourse is the least bad of all forum platforms I have found. | Especially if you're going to be targeting people born this | millennium. | KajMagnus wrote: | Aren't there lots of new forum software? | | Discourse, Flarum, | | and Lemmy, open source and reminds of HackerNews/Reddit: | https://join-lemmy.org (it's quite alive over at GitHub :-) | https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/graphs/contributors) | | And I'm developing another one, Talkyard, which reminds of | HN/Reddit as well: https://www.talkyard.io (also: | https://www.talkyard.io/-32/how-hacker-news-can-be-improved-...) | | It seems to me that companies often want forum software, | sometimes internally, sometimes for customer support -- on their | own domain, rather than over at Reddit. | | But for consumers, maybe, like others here write, it's mostly | Reddit (for English speakers)? | _the_inflator wrote: | Legendary XenForo is still around as well. | Cyberdog wrote: | XenForo is IMO currently the best general-purpose forum | system out there. Tons of features while still keeping the | essence of traditional forums; paginated, non-threaded lists | of posts which aren't powered by gigantic globs of JS doing a | bunch of XHRs and DOM manipulations before you can read | anything. | | Unfortunately it's a commercial product and the owners seem | to be willing to revoke licenses if they get bothered enough | about the existence of one of their licensees, as a certain | New Zealand agricultural collective discovered last year. | | Flarum and Discourse are more "modern" but not proper | successors to the traditional forum experience, in my | opinion. They're doing something else and I don't like it. | Dracophoenix wrote: | I've remember reading of a Talkyard as a replacement for | Disqus. If this is the same one, have you pivoted in a | different direction? | atlgator wrote: | I still enjoy a good forum. Forum posts feel more permanent than | Slack/Discord/Teams where it's much more conversational. The | latter feels more like IRC with more history retention and the | ability to do voice and video. | madrox wrote: | The purpose forums served aren't dead, but the experience has | continued to evolve. There's plenty of topic-based messaging | products out there...enough of them that if you don't like one | for a particular topic of your choice, there's almost definitely | another. This feels like a "cars killed the horse-and-carriage" | issue. | MrBuddyCasino wrote: | Forums that revolve around nerdy, male dominated hobby topics | like DIY speakers or woodworking are doing well and are still one | of the best ways to get competent help, or acquire deep domain | knowledge longer term. | mig39 wrote: | I personally run 4 different Discourse forums. It's an amazing | piece of software. | tester756 wrote: | Ehh | | I hate their layout, it doesn't remind me that "style" that all | forums used to use | geekbird wrote: | Pro: Forums can have much more granular moderation than public | places like reddit or discord. The making of a new login and | having it accepted keeps a lot of the crap out. | | Con: PHPBB is a pain in the butt, but is one of the most popular | forum softwares. It needs regular and constant maintenance and | upgrades, and if it's a busy forum can be nearly a full time job | to moderate and maintain. | | Slack has message sunset in free instances. Discord is hard to | search and has a cruddy UI. Reddit is... Reddit, and it's | moderation varies wildly. Twitter is like standing in front of a | firehose, trying to drink just what you need. | balentio wrote: | I have to admit, though I was around and participated in forums | during the time period specified, I now kinda hate them. The | culture is different now than then, and really, that's what's | "dead" now. A lot of little shits grew up with the internet, and | I mostly don't like them. | FpUser wrote: | I maintain forum for my customers. I also know enough companies | that host forums as well. Personally I am very much prefer forums | to FB/Twitter/Whatever similar. Actually I liked when it used to | be a newsgroups but that type is really dead. | fariszr wrote: | I think in general the best forum software is discourse, its very | well made, fully open source, and is pretty popular. | | forem, which is a new commer is a lot lighter, so it might be | useful, but I have never personally used it. | INTPenis wrote: | I wanted to search for the best e-scooter on the Swedish market | and instead of doing site:reddit.com I did site:flashback.org and | was satisfied with the results. | | Flashback.org is a standalone Swedish forum that has stuck in | there for over 20 years. Warning that it can be rather NSFW. | | I wish I knew of more like it off hand but I know I've seen them, | a lot of niche areas often have their own traditional forum. Like | indie game devs, ham radio enthusiasts and so forth. | | I think there is a psychological aspect to the type of people who | are not happy just discussing their interests in a facebook | group. That extra step of being an independent forum tends to | attract either older nerds, or those who don't find social media | attractive. | | Therefore I wonder if there is a market in a forum platform, | Forum as a Service. If you're using a forum platform, why not | just use Facebook? Ethical reasons? I dunno, just speculating. | mongol wrote: | Flashback is quite interesting as forum. For non-Swedes - this | is where you go when you want to know what is not spelled out | explicitly in mainstream news. For example who was the famous | celebrity that was arrested at some restaurant last weekend, or | what are the details behind the shooting that media writes | happened in suburb X last night. | | You need to sort through racism and mud to find the nuggets, | but it is sometimes invaluable because you learn things that | the mainstream news write weeks later, if ever. I wonder if | every country has a version of this. | DeWilde wrote: | I just add "forum" to my query and it returns results from all | kinds of forum. | walterbell wrote: | Recent thread with 100+ comments, _" Where have all the forums | gone?"_, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31923377 | orionion wrote: | >Recent thread with 100+ comments, "Where have all the forums | gone?", https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31923377 | | I missed that first post in the dueling firehoses of life | events and hackernews stories. Found a couple of forums to | check out! Thanks! | lazyjones wrote: | From my perspective as someone who wrote and moderated his own | NIH forum in 2000 - still in use today - the main reasons for the | slow decline in usage both by users and publishers were: | | - the move to media-heavy content (images and video) and the | problems integrating this seamlessly into discussion forums and | moderating it (as a non Big Tech publisher) | | - the increased politicisation of online discussions and more | complex legislation regarding "hate speech", privacy etc., all of | which make hosting and moderation of user-content platforms | unattractive for all but the biggest publishers, so most moved to | FB groups or similar platforms to reduce the effort required to | moderate. | | - non-threaded forums suck and threaded forums don't work well on | mobile phones | | - I suspect, but don't claim to know, that the bad quality of | popular forum software and consequently many forums getting | "owned" regularly with all dire consequences for users played | some role in this. | rhabarba wrote: | Forum platforms have either been dead for twenty years or they'll | never die. | | Admittedly, the days of "everyone runs their own phpBB" are long | gone (basically, Facebook killed them), but no single social | network can replace structured, threaded discussion boards yet. | | Which is good. | badrabbit wrote: | Curious, do people not consider stackoverflow or Quora a forum | platform? I wonder if posts like this are specifically talking | about oldschool bbs systems like vbulletin. | texaslonghorn5 wrote: | Those are officially q&a and not really forum sites. | Barrin92 wrote: | very surprised to not see the word 'reddit' mentioned once in the | piece (I already count 20 mentions here in this thread). | | It's huge, it's structurally probably the closest to the | traditional forum experience and my suspicion is it's eaten up a | lot of former communities. One inherent appeal to a platform like | that is that you have one identity across all instances which is | appealing for practical reasons (nobody wants to manage a dozen | accounts any more), and there's interaction across forums. | | That last part is pretty important I think. Forums are great for | the thing they deal with but they're also very silo-ish. With | people nowadays preferring to exist in a lot of different | communities that's often a disadvantage. | deepdriver wrote: | >One inherent appeal to a platform like that is that you have | one identity across all instances which is appealing for | practical reasons (nobody wants to manage a dozen accounts any | more) | | I see this as a downside. Redditors often stalk others' post | and comment histories for flamewar ammunition. This is the | means by which politics ends up leaking into unrelated | discussions and sub-communities. Putting all of a person's | opinions on every possible subject on one publicly-viewable | page decreases user privacy, and increases the likelihood of | splintered and polarized communities. | throwaway742 wrote: | It has gotten even worse now. Moderators of different | subreddits run bots that scan other subreddits and ban anyone | who posts to them. My main account is banned from dozens of | subreddits including default ones like r/news and r/pics just | for posting in a now banned lockdown skepticism subreddit. | | I was actually trying to counter misinformation by posting | there and I messaged the moderators with links to said posts | proving as much. They responded that it didn't matter because | I shouldn't be talking to "those people" anyways and then | they permanently muted me (preventing me from ever contacting | the moderators again). | | It's the worst with leftist subreddits. I got banned from a | generic socialist subreddit for posting in a "tankie" | subreddit. The "tankie" subreddit then banned me for posting | in a "reactionary" subreddit. I don't even necessarily agree | with any of those ideologies, but I enjoy debate and being | exposed to different points of view. Apparently that is no | longer allowed. | | It is frustrating that my 12 year old account is rapidly | becoming unusable due to being banned from more and more | subreddits and none of the bans are based on what I have | posted, but rather who I am talking to. | nop_slide wrote: | Slap skateboard forum still going strong. | | https://www.slapmagazine.com/ | rosiesherry wrote: | Thanks, I love finding living examples of old forums :) | anewpersonality wrote: | Anyone remember the Last Exit to Springfield forum? | | The early 2000s were the heyday for the most exquisitely designed | Simpsons websites. I often wondered how they made them look so | good. | theden wrote: | Is it one of these perhaps? http://www.lardlad.com/about.shtml | anewpersonality wrote: | Ha, "Paint Shop Pro" | moneywoes wrote: | Discord seems to have taken over | seydor wrote: | Discord is like a graveyard. People don't really talk after the | first day. Maybe they should switch from chat to forums, at | least let it be searchable through Google | haunter wrote: | > Discord is like a graveyard. People don't really talk after | the first day. | | You are on the wrong servers | | But hey I had the same experience on "traditional" forums > | make new post > wait for days > never ger a reply | | I like reddit and Discord much better because you get answers | much much quicker | powerhour wrote: | It's always a little disappointing to see a forum start | promoting a discord server. Splitting the community rarely | works and results in a worse experience for both groups. | jsemrau wrote: | Personally, I hate Discord. I always miss where I got a | notifcation for a post. The velocity of content is too high. | It's hard to search for content. | geekbird wrote: | I hate discord for its threading, spaminess, and now its | weirdness with multiple identities. It's also hard to sign up | for without them deciding that you are a bot and arbitrarily | banning you. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-20 23:01 UTC)