[HN Gopher] Cheap junk flooding Amazon has brand names like MOFF... ___________________________________________________________________ Cheap junk flooding Amazon has brand names like MOFFBUZW Author : rafaelm Score : 497 points Date : 2022-07-22 19:14 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | rahimnathwani wrote: | The thread didn't answer the question. | kbd wrote: | Happy to see this discussed on HN because I've constantly been | stressing about this whenever I shop on Amazon. "All these brands | are Chinese with random combinations of characters for a name" | | I've looked at laptop cases. Here is a sampling of brand names: | Lacdo, Voova, KINGSLONG, NIDOO, tomtoc, MOSISO, INVZI, XMBFZ, | Arvok, Kinmac, Londo... | | I've bought cases for my ipad and work laptop from Lacdo and one | for my upcoming MBA from Voova. They're actually great, but I | worry they're made with Uighur slave labor or toxic materials or | something. | | I'd prefer not to support Amazon, but where else am I supposed to | find stuff like this? Do I buy my electronics (eg. Hue lights | recently) from Best Buy instead, which has a worse return policy | and whose Geek Squad worked with the FBI to violate customers' | rights? | | Edit: Also, a few days ago I went on a search for a desktop | organizer. Here are some brand names: DALTACK, ARCOBIS, DEZZIE, | Hossejoy, Greenco, AMERIERGO, SONGMICS, X-cosrack, Marbrasse, | Citmage, Samstar, Beiz. It goes on forever. | | I checked Walmart and Target too, but wound up buying this one | from "Lavatino" https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09PL59RL6 The product | is actually awesome. The compartments are the perfect size to | hold my coasters and I organized everything that was loose on my | desk with room to spare. | | So, it feels great to get something I needed, but the whole | process still feels bad somehow. | notahacker wrote: | > Here is a sampling of brand names... Voova | | This amused me because, as a native English speaker, I once | considered buying Voova.com as a [then] freely available | brandable five digit dotcom! | | tbh names like Lacdo or MOSISO actually seem better than | rubbish names like Google or Nvidia | pathartl wrote: | We absolutely need some consumer protections for things like | this, but at the end of the day it takes some smart choices by | the consumer. Sometimes those smart choices are to not make a | purchase for that type of product, or compromise on design for | reputability, etc. | | Keep in mind that while Amazon is the white whale here, this | absolutely happens at pretty much any retailer that has moved | to an online store where they list more than any individual | store has inventory of. I hate supporting Amazon, but | personally Best Buy is the lesser of two evils, and at least | there I can return in store. | kbd wrote: | > at least there I can return in store | | The return process through my nearby Kohl's is super easy. | scrlk wrote: | I wish there was some way to force the "sold by Amazon" filter to | be on all the time; I think that would resolve most of the issues | I have with browsing on Amazon. | | There's still the inventory co-mingling issue that people have | mentioned in other comments. Solving this would mean I'd start to | consider using Amazon more frequently. | thaumasiotes wrote: | > want to get in touch with DOTTAVR? | | > well, they're on Amazon... surely they are a legit company and | Amazon is covering their bases... good luck! | | >> Business Address: | | >> longhuaqulonghuajiadaojinglongshequLONGHUANYILU | jiruizongheyuanWULONGDASHA Bdong502 | | >> Shenzhenshi | | >> Guangdongsheng | | >> 518110 | | >> CN | | This is the second time I've seen someone complain about | "obviously" illegitimate business information that appears to be | the vendor's own home address. I don't see how they could be | _more_ open or informative than that. Want to get in touch with | them? Send a letter to that address; they 'll see it. | josephh wrote: | Yeah, if that's the first thing that comes to their mind, then | they need to look themselves in the mirror real hard and wonder | whether they're the ones perpetuating xenophobia. | rahimnathwani wrote: | One of the posts contains a screenshot of a vendor's company name | and address. | | The company name (and words in th address) may look really long | and suspicious, but it's just because it's transliterated from | Chinese. | | OP says these are all 'shell companies', but AFAIK it's more | onerous and costly to register and maintain a company in China, | than in many states in the US. | ev1 wrote: | This is pretty much it. People always say it's random mess or | fake, but "youxian gongsi" is literally "limited company" and | based on Shenzhen. I do a lot of hardware ordering and speak | none of the language and picked this up over time. | | Chinese company names are generally [location] [selected name] | [what they do], like Baidu is Beijing + Baidu + Netcom Science | Technology. | | The transliteration in the tweet: | "shenzhenshizhengshunzidianziyouxiangongsi" | | Shenzhen-shi (city), Dianzi (electronics), youxian (limited), | gongsi (company) | | "wu long da sha b dong" seems like it's Five Dragons Building | (https://chinese.yabla.com/chinese-english-pinyin- | dictionary.... ;some kind of office park?), Building B, and a | suite number. The first line is something like "Longhuan 1st | Road, Jinglong Community, Longhua Street, Longhua District". | | It just looks like a mess because people are not used to it, | and in chinese writing you don't separate the characters - it's | "You Xian Gong Si " for limited company, not "You Xian Gong Si | " | trasz wrote: | I'm eagerly waiting for an option in Safari to translate text | automatically, without having to click every time. | notahacker wrote: | Same goes for brand names that are completely unpronounceable | in English and the fondness for ALLCAPS. _Of course_ people | accustomed to a completely unrelated language and writing | system are likely to come up with transliterated or synthetic | brandnames or acronyms that seem bizarre to English speakers. | Buyers make one-time-only purchases based on search result | order, price and star ratings, so localising brandname to the | market is well down the list of priorities below keyword | stuffing and trimming the Alibaba images. Names which look as | bizarre in ASCII as Huawei and Xiaomi have actually succeeded | in becoming brands in the West anyway. | | (Your comment should probably be the top comment for the | thread) | afro88 wrote: | Funnily enough some of them looked like Ikea product names | wizofaus wrote: | There was one that conceivably could have been a bad OCR | attempt to read Chinese characters using a Latin alphabet which | is weird, but some of them do also look like bad/non-standard | Romanisation attempts (with an odd lack of spaces etc.). Odd | because I'd think technology to accurately generate standard | (pinyin) romanisation must be reasonably good by now. | ev1 wrote: | The lack of spaces is somewhat normal if you assume that | chinese doesn't use spaces when writing, like a name is just | the glyphs combined together in one word, while in English | normally there is a space between F+L. | wizofaus wrote: | The point of Romanisation is to make it possible to at | least mentally turn it into "sounds" for those familiar | with Latin alphabets, who (except German speakers) | generally expect to see spaces between words too. Japanese | writing doesn't use spaces either but all the standard | Romaji transliterations do make use of spaces. | rahimnathwani wrote: | I was talking about the company name, but perhaps you were | talking about the brand name? | Fargoan wrote: | Amazon is the last place I go if I need to purchase something. | Sometimes I'll use it like a search engine and then go off-site | and make the purchase elsewhere. | Bellend wrote: | I am the same as you. Although the only difference is: | | 1. Amazon is the never the cheapest. 2. Their search is | absolutely garbage and I can't use it. I'd need to go | elsewhere, find a specific product, then search to compare. | | I just logged into Amazon and the last thing I bought was 2021 | "Leuko Tape" for hiking since it was the only seller that had | it at a reasonable price. | | I am genuinely always amazed by the responses on HackerNews. It | might be because amazon.com is just cheaper in general than | amazon.co.uk? | Narretz wrote: | The case that is mentioned is Oberdorf vs Amazon. Here's an | article from 2019. https://www.courthousenews.com/amazon-back-on- | the-hook-for-d... I can't find anything more recent. The case is | interesting as it needs to make a decision if Amazon has the same | responsibility for Amazon marketplace as it has for its own | listings. | protastus wrote: | I no longer have the patience to navigate Amazon's terrible | search results and have lost trust in the quality of their | inventory. | | Nowadays I only order from Amazon if the order is a time critical | item that only they can deliver on time for a reasonable price. | That's less than 5% of my purchases in dollar amount. | | I've been a customer since 1997. Amazon has impressed me with | their ability to play the long game, and I don't understand the | long term incentives favoring Amazon here. | dmix wrote: | > Nowadays I only order from Amazon if the order is a time | critical item that only they can deliver on time for a | reasonable price. That's less than 5% of my purchases in dollar | amount. | | Funny that's about 50% of my purchases because I'm terribly | impatient and don't (often) have a car so it's way easier than | going to the store and Canadas e-commerce options aren't nearly | as good as the US. | [deleted] | hinkley wrote: | > I don't understand the long term incentives favoring Amazon | here | | Possibly there's nothing to understand. It's easily been long | enough that it's plausible that people are playing Chesterton's | Fence games, getting promoted for increasing revenue by .05% | while making the experience 0.2% worse. | bmitc wrote: | I too have stopped buying on Amazon. I did so a while back | after being concerned about counterfeits, safety issues, etc. I | had this talk with my wife not too long ago about a mirror she | ordered from Amazon, clearly made in China by a no-brand | manufacturer. We discussed about how, yes, it looks nice, but | we have no idea what quality of glass they used. So if it falls | and shatters, it could be very dangerous. It also came with a | bunch stuff on it that looked like pieces of fiber glass. I | just don't trust anything on that platform anymore. I buy | everything else from more legitimate sellers selling brand name | stuff or directly from manufacturer's websites. | madaxe_again wrote: | The example given of silicone spatulas could be particularly | egregious - are they even RoHS or REACH compliant? They could | be chock full of SVHCs that you serve to your family every | supper. | | I might send some of our Amazon stuff for testing for | phthalates and find out. | bmitc wrote: | I have definitely made it a rule that we don't purchase | products that touch food from Amazon. I honestly have no | idea how the products there are passing regulations. Are | regulations even enforced anymore? | Phrodo_00 wrote: | This doesn't sound like an Amazon issue though, but an issue | with that specific product. You're the one who chose to | purchase it. You would likely have the same experience with | that product in other marketplaces like EBay, Walmart or | Alibaba. | Retric wrote: | Walmart stores actually do very carful inventory control, | and carefully manages the products it sells. The standard | may be lower than you expect, but they are real. | | Walmart marketplace is 3rd party sellers, but Walmart | doesn't commingle inventory so it doesn't infect the rest | of their products. | philistine wrote: | Walmart.com is an infinite shelf of dangerous knockoffs | just like Amazon. Walmart stores have no such problem. | mcphage wrote: | > You would likely have the same experience with that | product in other marketplaces | | Other marketplaces don't put up with the same volume of | crap being listed as Amazon. | philistine wrote: | Your comment implies we desire no product segregation from | Amazon, nor any quality control from them, which is not | something most people think of when they think of what | Amazon ought to be. Most people think of Amazon like they | think of a physical Walmart location; as a store that | vouches every product it sells. You put Alibaba or Ebay in | the same category as Walmart, but that's more akin to | Walmart.com, the thing that will kill that brand. People go | to Alibaba, eBay or Walmart.com for the dangerous Chinese | knockoffs. | | I want Amazon to be far more selective of the product it | sells. | corrral wrote: | If a marketplace lets itself get so dodgy that this kind of | thing's normal, that's absolutely the marketplace's fault. | | There's a big, shady flea market in a bad part of my city. | Barbed-wire protecting the roof. Heavy bars on all the | windows. Armed guards. Half or more of the vendors are | plainly fences, or have a close relationship with one or | more. Tons of stuff that "fell of the back of the truck". | Entire booths carrying counterfeits of luxury goods, sold | under the luxury brand name. It's kinda crazy it's allowed | to exist. | | You don't go there with the same expectations you do when | you go to Wal-Mart or Costco. | | Amazon tries to look like, and even started out as, a place | like Wal-Mart or Costco. Now they're the "how have the cops | not shut this place down?" shady flea market. It's 100% | their fault that they're like that, and to the degree that | they present themselves as anything else, that's deception. | maxerickson wrote: | It's easy to not buy from other seller's on the | marketplace. | | Did Amazon stop commingling fulfillment inventory? That's | where I worry about getting burned. | planetafro wrote: | I don't buy this for a millisecond. Amazon ushered in this | behavior and made it the "norm". It's throwaway, cheap, | non-branded junk... and dangerous. There is value in | discussion of the manipulation of the market and not just | "Shop somewhere else". It's predatory. | nus07 wrote: | I wonder if Amazon has reached a point where they have | eliminated all competition at least at a scale to no longer | worry about this especially since their only competitor Walmart | has similar cheap stuff that will require a drive to the store. | And targeting volume based sale where a lot of Americans | especially in rural or suburban areas don't really care about | the quality-read Walmart crowd. Also targeting other countries | like SE Asia, India, Brazil, Latin America, Africa where the | volume of sales will be so high that again quality of inventory | does not matter compared to ease of delivery. | gunapologist99 wrote: | > a lot of Americans especially in rural or suburban areas | don't really care about the quality-read Walmart crowd | | Please don't insinuate that rural or suburban Americans are | somehow "less than" or don't care about quality. There are | price-sensitive people everywhere. | larrik wrote: | Plus Walmart also mixes cheap dropshippers in their website | search results to trick you into buying crap of dubious | provenance. | toast0 wrote: | > don't really care about the quality-read Walmart crowd. | | I mean, in 2000, Walmart was where you got junk for cheap. In | 2022, Walmart is where you know the supply chain is vetted. | Everything on their shelves has been cost reduced to an inch | of its life, but they also have a good handle on where it | came from. It's a little bit easier to stay away from the | marketplace garbage on walmart.com than on Amazon, IMHO, but | I'd still rather shop somewhere without a marketplace. Unless | I'm looking for stuff you can only find in a marketplace, and | then you may as well go to ebay or aliexpress. | TavsiE9s wrote: | eBay has been more reliable for me the last two years. I don't | want to dig through thousands of fake reviews, reviews for wrong | items, etc. | supernova87a wrote: | It's like we're repeating an old era of the early United States | when every guy on a street corner would be copying reputable | wares and selling them without regulation, patent protections, | brand / trademark protections, and people were hawking quack | snake oil under any name. | | I'm all for reducing useless regulation, but sometimes you | understand where it originally came from as a legitimate need. | eslaught wrote: | Is it correct to say that when you get something "shipped and | sold by Amazon.com", it really comes from them? It's the | "fulfilled by Amazon" (the infamous FBA) that you need to watch | out for. | | It's a bit screwy, but you can filter by seller by clicking into | a specific product category, and then selecting Amazon.com in the | bar on the left. Then all the items should be "shipped and sold | by Amazon.com". | | But I've been sort of shocked to find recently that Amazon's | prices, even with free shipping, are often not competitive with | buying first-party, even with paying the shipping. For a lot of | products these days, if there's a recognizable name brand | associated with it, I just by first-party. You get it slower, but | you know what you're getting, and probably end up giving more | money to the seller too. | | I would not have seen myself doing this ten years ago. | elliekelly wrote: | I'm actually not sure that's a safe assumption. I could be | wrong but I _believe_ Amazon co-mingles products of the same | SKU. So if Amazon is selling a book and other sellers have | listed the same item as "new" and sent it to Amazon's warehouse | I don't believe there is any distinction between the two at the | warehouse. So the stock picker might grab Amazon's (presumably | authentic) item from the bin when they pack your order but | there's also a chance they'll grab the third-party-seller | "shipped by Amazon" item. My understanding is that it's all | kind of a crapshoot no matter how careful & deliberate you are | when ordering. | davidbanham wrote: | My understanding is that the items have different uuids, but | there are no markings on the physical item. They're | identified by bin location. | | There are lots of bins in the warehouse. They contain up to | around five items each. There is a theoretical possibility | that two of the same thing from different sellers could end | up in the same bin. At that point the picker wouldn't know | which is which. | AnssiH wrote: | > There is a theoretical possibility that two of the same | thing from different sellers could end up in the same bin. | At that point the picker wouldn't know which is which. | | Amazon's seller-side stickerless inventory documentation | specifically says that identical items from different | sellers are never put into same physical bin so that the | original source can be traced. | SnowHill9902 wrote: | Do you have any link for that? | derefr wrote: | Not same SKU -- same ASIN. I believe that brands that sell | _through_ Amazon (not FBA sellers), who are worried about | comingled inventory, can get their official product moved | over to a new ASIN, leaving the fakes behind in the old ASIN | bin. | colesouth wrote: | OP here - no. "Shipped and sold by Amazon.com" items can be | sent to Amazon's fulfillment centers by anyone with a Vendor | Central account. There is still plenty of fraud going on there. | | In general I would say it is _safer_ than an FBA or FBM offer, | but not totally safe. | | Vendor accounts are highly sought after by black-hatters | because: | | 1. It's much harder to track down shenanigans you run on them | (since as you said the only public seller info is "Amazon") 2. | They generally have higher authority for editing listings, so | if you want to change a competitor's images it's more likely to | stick from a vendor account | lph wrote: | Pro tip: If you absolutely must buy the junk being sold by | MOFFBUZW and other randomly generated drop-shipper brands, the | exact same product is usually available on AliExpress for 10% the | price. | breakingcups wrote: | I don't like having to give AliExpress my phone number. | blibble wrote: | having been personally harassed repeatedly over the phone by | Amazon third party sellers... Amazon is not any better | dreamcompiler wrote: | You've answered a question I've been asking myself for the past | couple of years: Why is Amazon trying to become AliExpress? | AliExpress already does a good job of being AliExpress. | | The answer is that Amazon has quietly pivoted: Their new | business model is | | 1. Buy stuff from AliExpress. | | 2. Mark it up 5x-10x. | | 3. Profit! | | Amazon probably hopes their customers don't notice they can get | the same stuff from AliExpress much cheaper. Which they won't | because only about 1% of Amazon's customers have even heard of | AliExpress. | | Even with speedy free delivery, Amazon's profit margin by | marking up AliExpress stuff is probably quite a bit higher than | it was for the old Amazon. | lotsofpulp wrote: | > Why is Amazon trying to become AliExpress? | | Because all the profit is in being a platform. Otherwise, | their retail operations would be looking at the sub 5% profit | margins of every other retail business in the US. | fmajid wrote: | It's AliExpress with 2 day shipping for people with poor | impulse control. The "free shipping" that costs 900%... | mindslight wrote: | I've got good impulse control and planning. Still, I needed | some TNC connectors for a surveying project and didn't want | to wait the month for Aliexpress/eBayDirect to show up, so | I ordered them off Amazon which had the best compromise of | price vs shipping time. Of course I did a visual quality | check when they showed up, as required for all direct | Chineseum. | | It's not surprising this niche has developed. What's | surprising is that Amazon seems dead set on undermining | their business to support it. It's also surprising that | people write these amazed posts like they've just | discovered this problem, when it has been going on for a | decade. | | I read a HN comment a while back that framed the topic of | declining quality plus free returns as companies | outsourcing their QC to the customers and that really stuck | with me. This is really the natural progression of wanton | consumerism - so much stuff is sold and never actually used | that it's profitable to only worry about the case where the | buyer actually uses it and finds it lacking. | cortesoft wrote: | I like getting stuff the same or next day. | paxys wrote: | And ships 12-24 weeks later.. | namdnay wrote: | I don't think it's drop-shipping, you see these brands even for | stuff delivered in 2-3 days | geerlingguy wrote: | Unfortunately with 500% of the shipping time (most of the time) | :( | DaveExeter wrote: | Aliexpress is getting better on shipping times! | | I placed an order June 30, it arrived July 17. | dspillett wrote: | That is likely luck: if your order makes a nice round truck | full, and that truck full makes a nice round container full | at the next stage, and the container is one of the last | loaded onto a ship that is due to leave soon, you'll get | the best delivery time. The next order will get the worst | or close to. | | As some of the recent supply chain issues are easing off | things will be feeling better when they are in fact moving | back in the direction of what was normal. | NavinF wrote: | It depends on location and how often people in your area | order from China. I used to get ePacket orders from | Shenzhen to San Jose within 10 days every time. Now that | ePacket is dead, AliExpress standard shipping takes 14 | days. | cheeze wrote: | And a terrible return policy | Cerium wrote: | All this cheap junk follows a fairly reliable markup scheme: | Factory sells for 1x Taobao sells for 2x Aliexpress sells for | 3-4x (2x Taobao) Ebay sells for 8-10x. (~2x Aliexpress) | | I think Aliexpress is usually about 20% of the Amazon price, | but depending on the item I agree that it can be 10%. | mrguyorama wrote: | With the caveat that on ebay, you can usually find someone in | the US wearhousing it for some reason with free 3 day | shipping for the same price. | notahacker wrote: | I've actually cross-referenced the original product on | Alibaba to check specs when ordering the marked up product | using eBay for Click-and-collect... | | Reverse image search works wonders against "unique" | brandnames. | wtallis wrote: | And quite often when ordering from an eBay seller with US | stock, the package that arrives has an Amazon logo on the | box. | krallja wrote: | This happened to me: I ordered a cheap UV EPROM eraser on | eBay with three-day delivery. It was literally drop- | shipped from Amazon, on an Amazon truck, in an Amazon | bag. I could have gotten the same (crappy, simple) | product on Amazon a day earlier for about a dollar less. | But I was trying to avoid buying on Amazon, because of | all the reasons posted in this comments section! | squarefoot wrote: | Happened also to me with some products when shopping | online either from Ebay or directly from some seller's | web shop (I don't have a Amazon account): items came in a | Amazon box with all their markings. No problems | whatsoever, but the sellers were reliable. | notatoad wrote: | >for some reason | | i think the scam here is that amazon or amazon sellers will | pay people to warehouse product in the US, because when | you're selling aliexpress goods at a 90% markup, you can | afford the warehousing. and the people they're paying to | run those warehouses list the product on ebay at 20% | markup, on the assumption that if it sells they can make an | aliexpress order and restock before the amazon seller | notices their product is missing. | nlh wrote: | I bought an espresso machine via Taobao last year and had to | jump through SO many hoops to get it. But even with the hoops | it ended up being an absolute steal - 1/10 the price of a US- | based purchase. | | Any idea why Taobao goes through such great effort to prevent | American buyers from using the platform? (Or was I doing it | wrong...? I used one of the Taobao forwarding services) | OJFord wrote: | Something 'generic' anyway, or is it something 'branded' as | it were but sold unbadged/not through the intended | channels? | | Just curious because I've never had any luck finding | something specific, just slightly different knock-offs. | Which can be fine of course, it's just less obvious to me | that should exist than under-the-table selling of extra | output, or rogue employees/company or whatever. Higher | effort and more enterprising. | OJFord wrote: | I do tend to prefer eBay/Amazon though, unless I'm really | sure about it (bought it before, say) since the experience | when it goes wrong is so much better. Amazon will | refund/replace no questions asked, eBay will be a bit more | hassle (MOFFBUZW type sellers tend to want to appease you | with a partial refund or random plastic toy for some reason) | but nothing a negative rating or such doesn't sort out. | | AliExpress.. by the time it arrives I've probably forgotten | I've ordered it, and if they won't offer a refund if it's no | good/wrong somehow then bank might say the transaction's too | old to do anything about (not sure about a time limit on | credit card protections, maybe that's a better option), just | generally more hassle. Not to mention the janky UX of | ordering in the first place. (Why can it never guess both | currency and delivery country correctly? UK & GBP isn't an | oddball combination...) | cheald wrote: | I've gotten to the point that if it's a nonsense all-caps name or | has an item description in broken English, I just don't bother. | It's gonna be trash. It'll fail in 3 weeks, there will be no way | to get it returned or repaired, the company won't exist, and the | product listing will be gone next time you come back to it. | OJFord wrote: | > It'll fail in 3 weeks, there will be no way to get it | returned or repaired, the company won't exist, and the product | listing will be gone next time you come back to it. | | We're talking about Amazon though right? You can definitely | return that, that's even inside the official return window (one | month). | yegle wrote: | Amazon employees have a "perk" of a 10% off multi-use coupon, up | to $1000. It applies to anything whose seller is Amazon (sold by | amazon.com). | | In the last few years it's been extremely difficult to make full | use of the "perk", simply because there aren't a lot of things | that are sold by amazon.com anymore. | Scramblejams wrote: | I guess we buy different things. Mine tends to run out pretty | early in the year. | namdnay wrote: | Maybe it's different in each country? I've used Amazon in the | UK and several European countries, and you can get tons of | major brands sold by Amazon (Apple, Dell, Samsung, Gardena, | Bosch etc) | decafninja wrote: | I'll be the odd person out and say that whatever it's faults as a | company, my shopping experience on Amazon has been great. Not | perfect, but nearly so. Certainly better than most other online | retail channels, plus the convenience of Prime, and being a "one | stop shop" certainly is super useful. | | I don't know what everyone is shopping for, But I've bought tons | of items across a wide variety of categories. I usually avoid the | obvious Chinese knockoff stuff (unless it's some trivially | unimportant thing), and don't find it hard to do so at all. | heliodor wrote: | That kind of unimportant stuff is usually found on ebay for | much cheaper. Usually things that cost no more than $10 or $20 | on Amazon sell for much less on eBay. The trinkets category. I | make a point of not engaging with that category on Amazon. It's | the least I can do to feed the monster less. | decafninja wrote: | eBay is also significantly more difficult and annoying to use | than Amazon Prime. | | I don't disagree with the morality argument, but Amazon has | made things so incredibly convenient for the consumer. | misterprime wrote: | Seriously. If it has that Prime mark on it, I know I'm | getting it at a ridiculous speed, plus that 5% cash back on | thus ugly old metal card that I used to like. Well, the | cash back reward is still very nice. | | I really wish I could switch to other online or brick and | mortar vendors, but nothing executes as well as Amazon in | my experience. I even tried ordering some computer parts | from newegg and it was fine, but it felt like I was back in | 2002 or so. | rich_sasha wrote: | Amazon carved a good niche for themselves by pretending you're | not buying from them but rather some "vendor". | | That's not right IMHO. The seller is Amazon; where they source | their stuff and what subcontractors they have is their business. | | It's like EBay takes more responsibility for products you buy, | even though that is explicitly a site for matching random buyers | and random sellers. Not that i use ebay much either. | namdnay wrote: | It that were the case, Amazon would be setting the prices, not | the contractors | alangibson wrote: | I wonder if theres a business idea in here. Set up a site that | looks better than Amazon (not hard) and only list reputable | listings on Amazon. Collect affiliate revenue. | | Basically just filter out the crap and profit | tylerrobinson wrote: | Right? I had the same idea when I read this. If you're serious | about it, reach out to my email in profile. I tried you at your | @landshark.io email but it bounced back to me. | helaoban wrote: | I've also mulled different iterations of this idea, | specifically with some kind of "on-the-ground" verification | of sellers / quality. I lived and worked in China for 8 | years, with a small spell of that time in manufacturing QC. I | know the country well and speak fluently. Feel free to reach | out, email in profile, and GP is also welcome to get in touch | if you read this! | cheald wrote: | FakeSpot kind of does this. Their browser extension can hide | Amazon listings directly on Amazon which fall below a certain | trustworthiness threshold. | intrasight wrote: | It would violate their terms-of-service and they'd unplug you | in a heartbeat - or after you'd sold a million dollar of stuff, | and they'd keep your affiliate cut | qqqwerty wrote: | That is basically what WireCutter is, among many others. | spathi_fwiffo wrote: | I've been less trusting of WireCutter reviews lately. Still | see so many of these strange brands listed when I go in to | read a review, combined with no real long term testing. Lack | of long term testing makes me not trust Consumer Reports as | much either. | | I still use their reviews as a reference point, but for a lot | of things I don't really go for their top selections. | misterprime wrote: | "We used this brand new hybrid truck for two weeks, and | it's great!" | | Yeah, I'm not sure what to do with that information. | alangibson wrote: | They are all content marketing. I'm thinking of essentially | an alternate storefront that is a garbage filter. | vineyardmike wrote: | The issue is that the listing URLs are shifty and reference | different things over time, and the listings can be hijacked. | alangibson wrote: | A URL is tied to an ASIN, so those don't change. | | But the listing can get hijacked. There's an opportunity for | improvement. Take down a listing when creative suddenly | changes, for example. | AlexandrB wrote: | The ending is rather unexpected: | | > despite all of this, i still mostly love Amazon as a customer. | it played a big role in getting my e-commerce business off of the | ground and i'm grateful for that. | | "It's a flea market full of cheap (and sometimes dangerous) junk, | but I still love it!" | Analemma_ wrote: | It's a hostage situation. This is how you can tell Amazon is a | dangerous monopoly: when even the people they fuck over have no | choice but to smile and say, "But we still love 'em!" | iamthepieman wrote: | Flea Markets are great. You can find obscure stuff you didn't | even know existed or that you needed. Amazon is a flea market | shoved into a Costco with bots stocking shelves with whatever | shows up at the loading dock. You think you're walking into a | reputable retailer, it has all the signs and signals of one, | but you're not. | larrik wrote: | Whoa whoa whoa, don't besmirch Costco like that! | tenebrisalietum wrote: | You do get the junk quickly and can send it back easily. | kelnos wrote: | And that's why Amazon isn't working to fix this problem -- | because they don't see it as a problem. Despite the | complaining, people still sell stuff on Amazon, and people | still buy stuff on Amazon, and presumably Amazon is happy with | their revenue numbers. So why change anything? | vineyardmike wrote: | I've been slowly trying to de-amazon my life, even more | aggressively than trying to de-google (which is easy once you | accept that search result quality is still good elsewhere). I got | a Shoprunner account and Walmart plus from AMEX and recently | started using it. I also found that VISA gets you a shipt | account. | | Shoprunner let's you buy direct from brand with 2 day shipping, | so you don't need to lose that benefit, while avoid "mass | marketplace" mis-incentives of amazon like fake products. It has | the benefit of being good on clothing, which amazon was never a | great destination for. | | I haven't used the Walmart "prime-equivilent" benefit, but it | seems pretty comparable to amazon prime but at a retailer that | has quality control (of some basic level). I'm just not much of a | Walmart user. | | Shipt gets you "Same day" delivery from stores like target, which | is a good counter to the growing same day delivery amazon has | been rolling out. I found that its way worse than amazon though, | since Shipt is "gig workers" and doesn't connect to the store's | inventory very well, so you never really know if your order will | be fulfilled in full. I use this for last-minute target orders | when I don't have time to visit the store. | | Shopify is rolling out a bunch of competing features, but the | most useful one is that they'll provide a single app to track | your purchases, which means you don't need 20 apps on your phone | for each retailer just to track that one package a month you | order (or more if that's you). | | Oh and now you have a bunch of accounts that you have to give | your data to and hope they don't get breached. | | TLDR: It's really hard to de-amazon if you're a regular and | hooked on the convenience BUT capitalism at work is providing | alternatives slowly... | stuff4ben wrote: | Imagine if Amazon dedicated some human effort and time to curate | their catalog and reviews instead of their legion of engineers | trying to automate the solution and continually failing. Hire a | bunch of college interns every semester and they'd have this | problem solved. | | EDIT: I actually forgot they have this already in Amazon | Mechanical Turk! | htrp wrote: | mturk might be legit worse | 99_00 wrote: | Decoupling from China can't happen fast enough. | trasz wrote: | As an European I'd prefer decoupling from US: | https://unsafeproducts.com/childrens-products/toy-elmo-recal... | callahad wrote: | The New York Times did some decent reporting into the pseudo- | brands which comes closer to answering the question in the title: | having a registered trademark unlocks a lot of on-platform seller | tools (predictive analytics, early review program, etc.), and the | easiest path to a trademark is to have an utterly unique, | nonsense name. Some Chinese municipalities were also offering | cash incentives for citizens who obtained foreign intellectual | property registrations, further exacerbating the problem. | | Full article at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/11/style/amazon- | trademark-co... | samstave wrote: | There was an amazing radio piece a while back about an outfit | in NYC of a guy who had a very lucrative Aamazon copy-cat | service: it was run by a family of Hassidic(sp?) Jews in | (brooklyn?) -- and what they did was have a bunch of them scour | Amazon for top rated items - then have their connections do | quick knock-off and sell them. it was a fascinating story... | Ill see if I can find it. | | They were on the early side of this phenom as it was a few | years ago... | | But this model is with pretty much everything these days Etsy, | Amazon, Alibabba-importers etc... | | Consumerism is cancer. | MerelyMortal wrote: | I'm not sure what the family's religion has to do with | anything, but I was curious about the spelling and put it in | my search bar and it's spelled, 'Hasidic'. | FalconSensei wrote: | my thoughts too. Wonder if they would have written 'run by | a family of christians' | samstave wrote: | I KNEW people would ask this ; it was a major aspect of the | story for some reason. They kept making reference to how | these "ultra orthodox jews in brooklyn" were doing some | revolutionary marketing/profiteering on the | interenet/amazon specifically and how they were making a | fortune doing so... | | It was _fundamental_ to whomever wrote the piece... | | So I mentioned it here. | | Sorry I failed your "anti-semetic triggers" - FFS. | Sebb767 wrote: | Well, to be fair, if "these scammers are ultra orthodox | Jews" was central to the piece "for some reason", the | author might've been _a tad_ on the antisemitic side. At | least your (in this context overstated and seemingly | unnecessary) mention of their religion makes it sound | like it. | trasz wrote: | He specifically mentioned Brooklyn though, so to me that | sounds more like starting the story with a general | feeling of the place. | samstave wrote: | Basically! this was the take-away | | SET THE SCENE: " _What you may think of sleepy hassidic | brooklyn as a religious enclave -check out these guys | with curls making a killing on amazon knock-offs.!_ " | fmajid wrote: | Well, I distrust Amazon for anything electrical or buy my | electronics and optics from the fine folks at B&H Photo, | which is owned by a (Satmar) Hasidic family. Sure, that | means I can't shop on Saturdays and have a much deeper | knowledge of the Jewish high holidays calendar than I'd | normally care to develop, but I don't worry about a | counterfeit battery blowing up in my face or a SSD upgrade | for my computer being a 16GB flash card fraudulently | reprogrammed to advertise itself to my computer as a 1TB | one. | dylan604 wrote: | Even B&H was susceptible to knock-off batteries. | Somewhere in the supply chain, fake batteries were | introduced, but not found until sold to customers. B&H | actually handled this in the only sane way vs the Amazon | shrug of the shoulders. | | Supply chain attacks are real and even reputable vendors | are susceptible. The difference is how the vendors react | with their customers that separates the good vendor from | the bad vendor. | nomel wrote: | > Well, I distrust Amazon for anything electrical | | I learned this the hard way when I received a counterfeit | playstation controller, straight from the "Sony" store. | For some reason, none of my reviews, even the positive | ones, have posted since that one, which included pictures | of a teardown. | B1FF_PSUVM wrote: | > what the family's religion has to do with anything, | | Back in the 1980s, NYC shops noticeably run by Hasidic | jewish folk were famous for having the best deals in | cameras and hifi. | | It was not just local, there was a good amount of mail | order business, and a large advertising footprint. I think | it faded out in internet e-commerce boom, but for older | shoppers the association may be relevant. | redler wrote: | I remember 47th Street Photo was a big one. | m348e912 wrote: | Some of it still exists. B&H photo is a very large jewish | owned electronics business out of New York. They have | some of the best high end electronics selection available | online and last time I checked they are closed on the | sabbath. | 0xfeba wrote: | Amazon itself does that with "Amazon's Choice" brand or | whatever. They use the stats of top selling items, clone it | for cheap, and take all the sales. | | https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special- | report/amazon-i... | woevdbz wrote: | After a couple really bad experiences with product quality | (think clothing items that don't last after a couple | washes) I no longer buy Amazon branded items. It's going to | play against them over time if they keep messing up on | quality. | alangibson wrote: | I've listed a few things on Amazon. This is very much true. If | you don't have a registered trademark youre a second class | citizen. You can't upload a video, for example. | jjwiseman wrote: | Thank you. I read the whole thread and then realized it didn't | answer the question posed in the first tweet. | robocat wrote: | https://archive.ph/jbuSK | derefr wrote: | But why are so many of these pseudo-brands exactly 1. six | characters long, 2. all caps, and have 3. point-form | descriptions that 4. use some particular emoji as bullet-point | symbols, and 5. give each point a separate, usually-capitalized | "title" part, 6. enclosed in either square brackets or the | even-more-niche punctuation[( )] ? | | To me, that reads either like these all being marques of one | company; or there being some Chinese "start a turn-key Amazon | business" SaaS that most of these pseudo-brands make use of, | which generates a brand name for you, and for product | descriptions, takes structured key-value input and formats it | into text in this style. | | Either way, it seems like finding that entity, and preventing | _it_ from interacting with Amazon, would stop a majority of | this in its tracks. | | See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mofiQ7EGBH8 -- all | the branded "knock-off" smartphones on Wish/AliExpress with | hardware meant to look like some well-known phone, but with | generic software (usually with a start-up screen that says | "WELCOME"), _are_ in fact made by a single white-label | manufacturer, Microhand /KST | (https://www.microhand.net/english/). | dwringer wrote: | I wonder if the telltale signs are much the same as in spam | emails: a tool to filter out customers who are more | discerning and thus liable to cause problems with Amazon if | they get ripped off (demanding refunds, reporting seller | misconduct, etc). | thirtyseven wrote: | What's hard to believe about several thousand sellers all | copying each other's homework? | derefr wrote: | Because it's not just the big things that are the same; | it's the little points of style that a "marketplace of | ideas" wouldn't think to share or copy. | | You'd expect, if you allowed someone to study your notes | before a test, that they'd possibly end up using similar | turns-of-phrase to yours on the test. You _wouldn 't_ | expect that they'd end up learning to perfectly duplicate | your handwriting. It'd both be too hard, and not worth it, | to do so; and they already have their own handwriting | style. So why would they? | jonas21 wrote: | Ah, but if you both learned to write from the same | person, then you _would_ expect the handwriting to look | similar (even if you didn 't let them see your notes). | | And I think that's what's going on here. Take a look at a | Chinese-language web site, like http://news.baidu.com | | You'll see that it has the "niche" punctuation you | mentioned, lots of point form descriptions with emoji | bullets, and nearly all the latin script on the page is | composed of short strings of all-caps text (many of which | are acronyms like "IPO" or "AEX" that would be | nonsensical if you didn't already know what they meant). | | Some of these stylistic elements are naturally going to | bleed over into Amazon listings too. | derefr wrote: | That's certainly an alternative possibility; more likely, | IMHO, than sellers copying one-another perfectly. | However... | | > You'll see that it has the "niche" punctuation you | mentioned | | It does, but there are only two examples of it on the | page right now. (It _is_ a thing common to Chinese text | generally, but it 's not the first thing you'd reach | for.)[()] gets used on this page as a sort of "tag" or | "section" for a story. In Amazon product descriptions, | meanwhile, it's being used to form a sort of two-tier | "[(title)] body" text; as if compressing a slide-deck | slide onto a single line. That's not what those | characters are "for", in Chinese. It's a misuse. A | Chinese reader would be confused. | | > lots of point form descriptions with emoji bullets, | | There are no emoji bullets on Baidu; there are _styled_ | bullets. But also, when I say "emoji bullets", I don't | mean that they use emoji _as_ bullets; I mean that they | use regular bullets, _and then_ use emojis as additional | "decorations" for each point. Like this: | https://i.imgur.com/xW3uPEP.png . AFAIK, nobody does | this, anywhere on the Internet, Chinese or otherwise, | other than on these brands' Amazon product pages. Because | it's silly. | | Consider also: if this was just "the way Chinese people | write product descriptions on marketplace websites", then | you'd expect to see it happening on e.g. AliExpress. But | you don't. AliExpress product listings just use regular, | random+inconsistent styling, with a diffusion of | different stylistic techniques spreading via natural | selection of sellers; with none of these particular | techniques being among them. It's _only_ a certain | implicit web of a few thousand Amazon product brands, | that have this extremely-consistent style. | travem wrote: | > You'd expect, if you allowed someone to study your | notes before a test, that they'd possibly end up using | similar turns-of-phrase to yours on the test. You | wouldn't expect that they'd end up learning to perfectly | duplicate your handwriting. | | Consider a foreign seller who perhaps doesn't have a | great grasp of the English language or the cultural | context of the US. When you add your own spin to someone | else's idea you are leveraging a lot of implicit | knowledge to be able to spin it in a way that makes | sense. If you don't have that implicit knowledge (and are | not going to be penalized for verbatim copying) why try | something different from what you have seen be successful | already? | derefr wrote: | What I'm saying is that it would take an immense amount | of effort, looking at literally tens of thousands of | Amazon listings, to even _realize_ that "this is what | everyone else is doing." I noticed these patterns because | I personally went through the top 100 items in every | leaf-node category of the Amazon store a few months back | (because I treat "finding obscure solutions to problems I | didn't know I had" as a hobby.) No new Amazon seller is | going to do that; and so no new Amazon seller is going to | notice _every detail_ of the pattern. | | Or, to put that another way: if this were a "marketplace | of ideas", there'd be a certain amount of mutation, of | copying error, to be expected, from individual sellers | not noticing _all_ of the stylistic quirks other sellers | use; and instead substituting something random. | | But instead, what you see is _perfect_ copying of style, | with _no_ mutation or variation, among what are | ostensibly _thousands_ of distinct sellers /brands. | That's implausible. | | (Also, for a bit of a knock-down argument I maybe should | have pulled out sooner: when there's an update to the | "optimal style" used by these brands? They _all change_. | All at once. Thousands of different brands got rid of the | [()] -- replacing it with [] -- _on the same day_ , some | time last year. Real independent sellers, even if they | notice tiny changes in popular style like that, can't | react that fast, and don't have time to be constantly | updating _all_ their product listings. But a SaaS sales | platform with a post-maintenance bot sure does!) | oceanplexian wrote: | Conspiracy Theory: Maybe the sellers aren't human but | actually an ML model run amok | the_gipsy wrote: | Maybe amazon cracked down on those weird barckets, just | for cleanliness sake. | redler wrote: | That sort of bulk change, all at once, might just be | Amazon deciding to canonicalize the bracket menagerie. | derefr wrote: | Not so: the change happened across all these thousands of | brands that had the exact style; but it _didn 't_ happen | to the minority of posts that _were_ from "real" | independent Chinese marketplace-of-ideas sellers, who | _had_ copied the style with errors, or independently | reinvented it. Those other listings still use the | dictionary-headword brackets. So no Amazon-side | canonicalization was performed. | honkdaddy wrote: | >"start a turn-key Amazon business" | | From the very limited research I've done, it is something | relatively similar to this. There's a market in China of | selling e-books which teach you various ways to make money on | the English-speaking web without having to know much English | yourself. | | I mean it makes sense, if you go to BlackHatWorld or | HackForums there are loads of people selling guides teaching | you to do similar stuff, they're just in English. I imagine | that given China's position in the marketplace, it's probably | fairly lucrative for an individual or small company to make | nonsense brands and sell stamped tech-junk for 10x markups to | Americans. | blowski wrote: | A lot of fraud is remarkably uncreative. Look at Companies | House in the UK - you can spot many of the scams a mile off. | derefr wrote: | But these are the kind of properties where it takes a lot | of staring at many different examples to even spot the | pattern. | | I don't expect that someone deciding to do their own spin | on this would bother to notice these little things. It'd be | like someone setting out to make their own mass- | manufactured chicken nuggets, and _accidentally_ recreating | the exact set of nugget shapes McDonald 's uses. | hgsgm wrote: | makeitdouble wrote: | > Either way, it seems like finding that entity, and | preventing it from interacting with Amazon, would stop a | majority of this in its tracks. | | From the comments I was expecting a flood of knock-offs or | really problematic products, but it seems the main argument | is they're cheap and delivery takes a boat trip across the | globe. | | Is there any solid reasons these vendors shouldn't be on | Amazon ? | | The knock-offs on AliExpress look to me like a different | problem. | throwway1490 wrote: | The New York Times doesn't answer if this is beneficial for | consumers, which is obviously the thing smart people want to | know. Like why does Amazon put up with this? | | Even if zero people bought these weird brand products, their | existence causes prices to go down, because prices are at the | margin, and that's why it pisses off our Tweeter. Because he | has to sell for less profit. | majormajor wrote: | Obviously it wasn't good for the person that went blind. | | You can debate, of course, where one should draw the line in | terms of a race to the bottom of the quality barrel crosses | from "good" to "bad" but intentionally avoiding liability and | responsibility through lies and shell companies is a pretty | clear case. | | There's plenty of foreign-brand stuff available for good | prices at equal-to-or-higher-quality domestic US brand stuff. | But then there's also complete garbage scam trash, and Amazon | should absolutely deal with that. | | At least the stupid-ass brand names make it easy so far to | avoid this stuff. | pbourke wrote: | My n=1 observation is that these bogus listings cause me to | either find a well-known brand and/or go somewhere else that | has more trustworthy listings. | squeaky-clean wrote: | The only reason it causes prices to go down is because they | don't follow regulations or are outright fraud. If they were | legitimate businesses they wouldn't be playing Amazon Ban | Whack-a-Mole | hgsgm wrote: | jmrm wrote: | It's a shame how Amazon is bloated of Chinese off-brand products | with mediocre quality. Some of them are simply products from | AliExpress, DealExtreme, or similar Chinese websites but sold | more expensive. | spicymaki wrote: | The scam is enormously profitable for Amazon and the Chinese | black hats. You can tell it is really profitable because Amazon | will compensate you for up to $1000 for damages caused by this | junk. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-58163915 | | I believe that Amazon probably could not turn the screws on these | companies even if it wanted to. It would be a massive loss to | their revenue and share holders would revolt. It would bring | prices up in aggregate if these companies could not sell junk on | the platform. | | The best they can do is play coy and hope the US government or EU | does not crack down hard on them. Caveat Emptor my friends! | [deleted] | wnevets wrote: | The amount of non sense on amazon these days has me just ordering | from target or other retailers. | WheatM wrote: | cronix wrote: | You'll also find the same product with same description/images | listed by multiple different "companies" all with odd names like | this. | Trias11 wrote: | Rock bottom prices, free delivery (with prime) + one click, no | risk, no question asked refunds overweight fakes and crap. | | Hard to argue with that, honestly. | | Obviously if you want to buy genuine Rolex, or quality European | made tools, Amazon is not the place. | draw_down wrote: | Cupertino95014 wrote: | Someone in the postings wonders what would happen if Retail was | split from AWS. | | Good question. Supposedly Retail is not profitable and AWS | carries all the weight for the company. I don't know if that's | true or not (?) | | Anyhow, I don't think it would make that much difference. The | reputational hit that Retail takes every day probably does not | carry over much to AWS, nor does AWS good will (if there is any) | help Retail at all. | d23 wrote: | I look for alternatives to Amazon every time now and have | cancelled prime after 15 years. | chainwax wrote: | [deleted] | pvg wrote: | _Please don 't complain about tangential annoyances--things | like article or website formats, name collisions, or back- | button breakage. They're too common to be interesting._ | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | spiderice wrote: | It's so tiresome to read this on every twitter thread that gets | posted to HN | xyzal wrote: | But you agree, don't you? | _moof wrote: | Completely beside the point. It's exasperating to see an | identical tangent on every discussion. | pvg wrote: | Downvote and flag them. Be the punitive fist of messageboard | justice you want to see in the world! | mod wrote: | Cole South used to be one (probably still is) of the best poker | players in the world. | quwert95 wrote: | I have a tip for Amazon shopping related to these weird brand | names: Do not buy anything that will go in or on your body. Doing | this significantly reduces the likelihood of counterfeit or | poorly packaged goods. | Havoc wrote: | >1. i just need some commodity cheap and fast, and am not too | worried about safety or authenticity. | | Made this mistake with a cheap rice cooker. Main voltages, high | temps, water and steam and sketchy wiring was a terrible plan | Aachen wrote: | The long twitter message list doesn't contain an actual answer to | the question. Just a rant everyone likes to agree with and would | like to see solved and that's why this is on the top 3 front | page, no actual interesting content (stay for the discussion, | though, but save some time reading the OP). | aendruk wrote: | It's disappointing. I'm all too familiar with the phenomenon of | marketplace spam by seemingly nonsense all-caps brand names, | and have been curious about the reasoning behind the names. How | are they chosen? Is it really nonsense or just a language I | don't know? Are there patterns to it? Plausible influences? | | I waded through Twitter's hostile interface only to be made a | fool of by hostile content. | | Update: At least the title here has been changed now to remove | the trick lede. | alibarber wrote: | I thought the takeaway was 'any suitable dictionary word would | likely have been taken, or make as much sense as random | nonsense anyway, and they're creating so so many of these pump- | and-dump brands hawking junk that it's easier to just use a | literal random character string' | TameAntelope wrote: | Is there an opportunity to create a marketplace that does | meaningful validation and testing of the items on it, such that | when you buy a product, you can be guaranteed to be getting the | real thing? | | What could a competitor do to attack Amazon here? | jollyllama wrote: | My favorite example is BEEGOD, I was never sure if it was "be | god", "bee god", or "be good." | JadoJodo wrote: | Pretty interesting. Its odd Amazon allows this to happen, but I | guess they have no incentives not to. Reminds me of this video | from the Pitch Meeting YouTube guy: https://youtu.be/nQpxAvjD_30 | gibolt wrote: | It is becoming hard to find anything trusted online. Here is | the equivalent Ryan George video for Google: | https://youtu.be/NT7_SxJ3oSI | | Same problem. Different clothes | yjftsjthsd-h wrote: | > but I guess they have no incentives not to | | I'm surprised that reputation didn't do it. (But I agree; | Amazon's behavior certainly seems to show that they don't | care.) | elforce002 wrote: | I only shop on Amazon when there's something that's difficult to | find. That's it. I prefer spending on niche or small shops. | toomuchtodo wrote: | https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1550230795230781440.html | | https://web.archive.org/web/20220722194603/https://threadrea... | metalliqaz wrote: | Amazon "... is turning their marketplace into a flea market of | total junk." | | Man if this isn't the dead-on honest truth. Amazon is so garbage | now that Walmart.com is a trusted supplier by comparison. | | I can't believe Amazon gets away with the crap they do. They so | obviously turn a blind eye to constant, serious anti-consumer | crap from Chinese sellers. Why? And why doesn't the FTC or any | other department do anything? | wollsmoth wrote: | yeah... I kinda use walmart more since it has a better | signal/noise ratio. | kmeisthax wrote: | Half of the Twitter thread is just talking about literal bribes | paid to Amazon staff to conveniently change things in the | system in the black-hat sellers' favor. | | This is not a "why don't they fight the spam harder" problem. | That's _Google 's_ problem. Amazon's problem is, apparently, | that their corporate culture is so toxic and broken as to make | any kind of internal controls or moderation outright useless. | DanAtC wrote: | Walmart has third-party sellers now too. | drpgq wrote: | I wonder if they would care more if they got split from AWS | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | > Man if this isn't the dead-on honest truth. Amazon is so | garbage now that Walmart.com is a trusted supplier by | comparison. | | I would have agreed with this sentiment six months ago, but now | Walmart allows third-party sellers. I could consolidate to "At | least BRICK-AND-MORTAR Walmart stores should have reliable | products", but physical Walmart seems to have gotten in bed | with this Chinese brand "onn." Their products are _absolute | garbage_ , and they seem to have jettisoned everything else | from their store. I've had to tell my parents to please stop | buying any electronics stuff from Wal-Mart and go to a Target | or something when their iPhone cable breaks so that they can at | least get a proper Anker cable. | | It's really tiring how much time I have to spend protecting my | family from junk products these days. | metalliqaz wrote: | I should add that I always select "available for pickup" when | searching for something. In other words, stuff that B&M | stores sell. | | But even still, the third-party sellers aren't as bad on | walmart as they are on amazon | zucked wrote: | They're literally the same - I see the same product sold by | shady third parties being sold on both sites. At least with | Walmart you can select "Available for pickup" and get | products that Walmart themselves sell and stand behind. | AlexandrB wrote: | I think "onn" is just Walmart's "store brand" for generic | electronics[1]. Kind of like "Insignia" and BestBuy. The | design and manufacturing is all outsourced and these are | usually quite crappy as one would expect. | | > Walmart is Onn's parent company. Onn is Walmart's generic | brand electronics label, and Onn products, including Onn TVs, | are only available in Walmart stores. | | [1] https://sycamorenet.com/blog/who-makes-onn-tv/ | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | Regardless, the last time I went into a Wal-Mart where my | parents live, it wasn't just that they were prioritizing | the onn brand stuff: it was literally all they had. | Reliable third-party brands like Anker weren't even on the | shelves anymore. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | I have a hunch this might be Walmart's finely tuned | supply chain figuring out that Onn is what sells best at | that location so they overstock that particular store | with them. | | Last time I was in Walmart (2 days ago) I picked up a | SanDisk SD card specifically because I've had good luck | with them. All the other brands were there and Onn was | just the stuff on the bottom shelves. | rexf wrote: | TFA: | | > what's the root cause of all of this? | | > Amazon courting overseas manufacturers and sellers at all | costs. | | Why though? How does it benefit Amazon to have endless, no- | name, bad quality listings? It makes the consumer experience | awful & dangerous, not to mention the continued lowering trust | in the marketplace. | | As others have mentioned, it's often better to go to | Target/Walmart/Costco/etc to buy from a reputable supply chain | (instead of risking getting counterfeit goods from Amazon). | | Amazon excels on shipping speed (logistics), but why bother | when it's mostly garbage that sometimes gets returned? | svachalek wrote: | It really seems like they want to be a shipping and warehouse | service and get out of retail entirely. Maybe better profit | margins, or an easier way out of looking like a monopoly. I'm | sure they've got some metric to quantify how much profit | they're getting for each ounce of reputation lost and they're | #winning. | metalliqaz wrote: | Yeah I wish he had elaborated on that point. What are they | doing to court those sellers and most importantly, why? | Surely they know that their reputation is going down the | tubes. Are they just so dominant now that they don't care? | comicjk wrote: | Probably Amazon is afraid of being replaced by AliExpress, | which has lots of these sellers and their low prices. | snazz wrote: | As long as Amazon has their fulfillment and delivery | network, I don't think they'll ever be replaced by | AliExpress (in the US, at least). I've never seen anyone | delivering packages in an AliExpress van :) | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | Just recently Amazon allowed me to buy a kindle book for my | specific kindle device, which turned out to not be supported. | But they still allowed me to purchase and deliver it to this | kindle. Only once I went to the device to sync it did I learn | that it was incompatible. I was not allowed a refund. | | The reasonable behaviour would of course be to give a pop-up | like "hey, you're trying to buy a book that doesn't work for | your Kindle, are you sure this is what you want?" I bet they | have some sort of disclaimer hidden away in some giant heap of | legalese making it "legal" but the whole flow was clearly | designed to trick people this way. And I'm a programmer, I | don't get tricked as easily as the average person in this | context(I hope). | | Amazon is full of minor counts of fraud like this and at their | scale I bet it adds up to real money. | metalliqaz wrote: | I'm amazed they even sell books in the Kindle store that | don't work with all the Kindles. Like, it's a book... what's | not compatible??? | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | Beats me. It's even a Paperwhite, not like it's completely | prehistoric either. The book was Operating Systems: Three | Easy Pieces. Hell it's even freely available in html | format, but I wanted to buy it anyway because I like to | support authors of great books whenever possible. I've not | yet tried to sideload the free version, but I bet it would | work... | loloquwowndueo wrote: | All the books I've bought for my kindle have a "bought by | mistake? Press here" thing which instantly removes and | refunds it. | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | I've never seen anything like that. I was able to request a | refund, and I did, but it was denied. I then contacted | support with no luck there either. Maybe you have consumer | protections I don't in your country? | | Nevertheless, why on earth would it allow the purchase to | happen when it was set to deliver to a specific unsupported | kindle, my only one? It just makes no sense other than as a | scam. | Booktrope wrote: | On the other hand, much of what passes for "reputable" brands | is just reselling the crap from the same sellers, but with a | "trusted" name on it. | AlexandrB wrote: | See also this blog post on USB-C hubs: | https://overengineer.dev/blog/2021/04/25/usb-c-hub- | madness.h... | bendbro wrote: | Walmart does dropshitting too. Hell, even Home Depot is getting | into it. You can often find the same piece of garbage furniture | on all 4 | spaceman_2020 wrote: | Everyone who does anything online should be required to hang out | on some black hat internet forums and marketplaces. | | It really opens up your eyes to the sheer size of the fake | account and bot traffic, market. It makes you skeptical of | everything you see online. | | You can buy verified Twitter accounts, blue check mark accounts, | Facebook ad accounts, Google AdSense/AdWords accounts, Amazon | accounts, and more bot traffic than you can imagine. All for a | few hundred dollars at most. | | I wonder what the internet would really look like if there was no | bot traffic, fake clicks, and fake accounts. | ms4720 wrote: | Porn and cat pictures | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | Furry? You can have both! | amelius wrote: | This sent me down a rabbit hole. | fknorangesite wrote: | That's one way to put it. | anakaine wrote: | Don't linger too long. You'll wind up like Alice. | thrwwy5685865 wrote: | Everyone who does anything online should be required to hang | out on some black hat internet forums and marketplaces. It | really opens up your eyes to the sheer size of the fake account | and bot traffic, market. It makes you skeptical of everything | you see online. | | You can buy verified Twitter accounts, blue check mark | accounts, Facebook ad accounts, Google AdSense/AdWords | accounts, Amazon accounts, and more bot traffic than you can | imagine. All for a few hundred dollars at most. | | I wonder what the internet would really look like if there was | no bot traffic, fake clicks, and fake accounts. | pixl97 wrote: | >I wonder what the internet would really look like if there | was no bot traffic, fake clicks, and fake accounts | | So kind of the internet we had in the early to mid 90s | spaceman_2020 wrote: | Brilliant! :) | [deleted] | Nextgrid wrote: | > I wonder what the internet would really look like if there | was no bot traffic, fake clicks, and fake accounts. | | In an economy where the only thing that matters is actual money | there wouldn't be any bots - after all I don't see bots queuing | up to _buy_ stuff. This is a problem the bullshit advertising | and "growth & engagement" industry brought on themselves. If | you pay people to click on stuff, they're gonna click it, tell | others to click or build machines to click. | lovich wrote: | There are definitely bots to buy things. Finance alone does a | fuck ton of automation to buy things at far faster reaction | speeds than possible and then there's the | eBay/Amazon/whatever online retail bots that exist to scoop | up in demand items to then flip | Nextgrid wrote: | Bots that buy things only do so to address a temporary | inefficiency in the market - they won't work perpetually | and you can argue their actions do provide value. | pyinstallwoes wrote: | Now who's putting the token into who? | SamBam wrote: | It's in the actual-money economy as well. That was the point | of the article. | | Anytime you have thousands of versions of things to sell | (Amazon) you're going to need a ranking mechanism. And | ranking mechanisms can be gamed by bots and other tricks. | spaceman_2020 wrote: | Bots don't buy stuff, but bots can push human persuasion | triggers. Something with 10,000 positive reviews on Amazon | feels like a much better buy than something with 2 reviews. | hasperdi wrote: | I'm curious... could you give some examples of these blackhat | forums? | zachkatz wrote: | https://www.blackhatworld.com/ | lopatin wrote: | I used to hang out on that forum many years ago during my | school lunch breaks, before I found the light. Never | thought I'd see the day it's linked to from HN. | CSMastermind wrote: | It reminded me of https://www.antionline.com/ which I | used to hang out on like 20 years ago. To my surprise it | appears to still be up and running. | [deleted] | distrill wrote: | Unless I missed it, he didn't really talk about why these names | exist, other than to suggest it might be a troll? | | Related, I don't understand twitter as a place for long form | content. It's difficult to read and it can't be easy to post. | Narretz wrote: | The idea is that these names are generated pseudo-randomly or | arbitrarily because they have no brand value. Sellers that use | them run through "companies" quickly as they get banned for | forbidden practice or because their reputation tanks. Then they | create the next seller account with another name. | distrill wrote: | Ah, yeah, I suppose. Maybe I need things spelled out for me. | misterprime wrote: | I've been wondering why I do like Twitter for long form | content. At first, I hated it. But then I got caught up in | several long threads, and invariably at the end someone would | link the threadreader collection of the whole thing. I kept | thinking, I'm just going to start going to the bottom and | looking for that link, but I never did. | | Instead, I learned to love it. It's almost a way of being | reminded again and again about who is speaking, and it gives | you a little feedback of how interesting other Twitter users | found that particular section. | | I don't really like that I learned to love it. I think it might | be unhealthy. But that's a different issue. | namdnay wrote: | That article was a bit of a bait-and-switch: instead of | explaining why the Chinese resellers all use similar patterns, | the author just spent 30 twitter posts complaining about being | undercut by cheap Chinese crap | mfkp wrote: | Here's unrolled version, easier to read: | https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1550230795230781440.html | coding123 wrote: | my wife and I have been increasingly buy on Target, HomeDepot and | other sites to buy things because the brands are much more likely | to have a legit business backing them up. | | Generally too one of the causes of this craziness is that we keep | outsourcing our manufacturing to China. China is only making | these items because a much larger American company like OXO has | them making really awesome kitchen items (for example) So it's | not that hard for the same factory to create a series of shell | companies that also sell the OXO stuff. I mean how hard is it to | copy and paste the ads that the legit companies make and sell | directly? | | If we didn't outsource everything then it wouldn't be happening. | dkarp wrote: | I recently moved to the US from the UK. In the UK, we have | Argos that sells a few versions of each product at different | price points. If you pay more, you get better quality and you | aren't sifting through hundreds of fake brands of similar | products. | | Target is definitely the closest we've found over here. | aimor wrote: | I've been making a conscious effort to buy things manufactured | in the USA. Made in USA still exists for a lot of things and | the quality and design is superb compared to all the Chinese | junk. What really surprises me is the prices are also very | reasonable. | | Right now buying home goods online is a nightmare: Search | engines don't help, the big retailer websites are full of junk, | prices are unbelievable. But I've had great success identifying | the handful of companies that make X in the USA and ordering | directly from them. | ohlookcake wrote: | I was excited to know where the names come from, and after | reading all of the tweets I still don't know. If the answer is | just: it's a random collection of letters because it's not a | brand they want to build, then that's a very predictable and | uninteresting answer. | barbOzon wrote: | The author writes: | | > _how can you protect yourself as a consumer?_ | | Followed by a tedious list of hoops to jump through around | verifying authenticity to a point where you might not get stung. | | At this point, is it not better to just give up on Amazon and use | a retailer that takes its product sourcing more seriously? | | Continuing to use Amazon when you know how full to the brim of | scams it is, just seems to me like rewarding them for bad | behaviour. | | Take your money elsewhere, with everyone else, and let the | invisible hand of the market give Amazon a bloody good slap. | karaterobot wrote: | Looking at the name of the company, reading recent reviews, and | ensuring there is a non-obviously-fake address associated with | the business doesn't sound like a tedious list of hoops to jump | through to me. You should do all this stuff on any marketplace, | Amazon or elsewhere. | | Honestly, if we're talking about convenience, Amazon is pretty | much the best game in town. They have many documented failings | and faults, but being inconvenient isn't one of them. | mentalpiracy wrote: | if Amazon just wants to be the market, that's one thing. but | they're also trying to position themselves as a brand name | with notion of value attached (e.g. amazon basics). | | I value my time and don't want a 'caveat emptor' market | experience, so I've largely given up on Amazon as a reliable | market browser. | fassssst wrote: | My solution was to buy most stuff from Costco/Target/Best Buy | instead. Their buyers do good enough vetting that it saves me a | bunch of time. | javajosh wrote: | Well, you could also use newegg, bhphoto, alibris, discogs | and etsy (gifts) - which are all, like Amazon, purely online | retailers. Each of the alternatives beats Amazon in its | particular niche, and pretty much always has. But Amazon is | convenient because it sells _everything_. | [deleted] | Ancalagon wrote: | Its funny how much less online shopping Im doing these days | specifically because of my bad experiences ordering from Amazon. | | I feel super old school going into stores, and even my girlfriend | complains about it, but I no longer will risk the annoyance of | delivery times and returns processes - nor the risky health | effects of buying food online or clothing or kitchen ware that | I'll interact with often. | nopenopenopeno wrote: | I find it more and more difficult to return items to stores in | the US because they keep their returns deparments so short- | staffed. Home Depot and Target are 2 places where I have stood | in line for 45min to 1hr just to return something. | Ancalagon wrote: | My experience is the opposite - at least with HD. I come in, | wait 5 minutes max, and return my item and the money is back | on my card within the day. Never had a hassle either | returning even more expensive, even custom-fit orders (window | blinds). | | I don't know about target as I don't shop there too often. | NavinF wrote: | Yep, my local Home Depot has no line for returns and they | don't ask questions. Example: They gave me a full refund | when I returned an empty box of wooden dowels after I used | them for a project and realized the box had fewer dowels | than advertised (likely because someone opened it and stole | a few). | coldpie wrote: | Yes, I've switched almost entirely to B&M shopping, and I | haven't ordered from Amazon specifically since 2019. Physical | stores have limited retail space, so they have a good reason to | be choosy about what they stock. It's worth a few extra bucks | to me to not have to sort through online flea markets like | Amazon (plus, it gets me out of the house). | rootusrootus wrote: | I still end up using Amazon for a lot of things, but I do find | the gibberish chinesium crap somewhat amusing. I won't buy | anything that isn't sold by Amazon, brand name, and not a battery | or other really common counterfeiting target. | | I also use eBay sometimes, but the prices are 9/10 times higher | than Amazon for brand name items. | tryptophan wrote: | Shopping on amazon is really an awful experience nowdays. I | really do not want to search through 40 pages of water kettles of | really dubious brands. It is so anxiety inducing and unpleasant. | bee_rider wrote: | It is fine for, like, getting an HDMI cable. | | I would never buy something from Amazon that touched my food. | | Electronics more complicated than a cable require some review, | figuring out if there's a reputable brand underneath, etc. | Nexxxeh wrote: | >It is fine for, like, getting an HDMI cable. | | Only true for what are, now, low-end HDMI cables. Really | difficult to get a good one that's actually within spec for | high-bandwidth applications. | shantara wrote: | I highly recommend Blue Jeans Cable - | https://www.bluejeanscable.com/store/hdmi-cables/hdmi- | cable.... | | Their cables were the only ones that consistently delivered | full promised bandwidth and stable connection even at long | cable lengths. Plus, their email support has been very | helpful, and had the same "quality cables, no bullshit" | attitude as the rest of the website. | | No affiliation, just a happy customer of 5+ years. | fmajid wrote: | +1, BJC is the place to go for custom AV cables not | tainted by audiophile snake oil. | KerrAvon wrote: | Blue Jeans seems to have pretty reasonable prices, too, | although I didn't look at shipping. | | I've found Monoprice's higher-end HDMI cables to be | reliable. | WildGreenLeave wrote: | In The Netherlands we have 2 big mainstream shops for | electronics, this is Bol.com and Coolblue.nl. Bol.com started | out as a webshop and moved into a marketplace idea (like Amazon | does). I know a lot of people that prefer Coolblue over Bol | because of this exact reason. Every product that Coolblue is | selling has at least some kind of guarantee of quality, because | if it is bad, they will have to replace it. | | Sadly enough, at this point Amazon.nl is overshadowing this by | giving insane discounts and refunds to customers, so I hope | they do not win over Bol.com, but I am anxious about it. | contravariant wrote: | Bol.com has put themselves in a bit of an awkward position by | being at the mercy of third party resellers, but all Amazon | just seems to sell the stuff you can get in the German Amazon | with slightly shorter delivery times (for _some_ things). | | And at least with Bol.com you only need to deal with | (sometimes dodgy) companies in the Netherlands, whereas with | amazon you haven't got a clue where it's coming from, and a | lot of it just seems to be stuff from alibaba at a big | markup. | SoftTalker wrote: | Yeah I haven't bought anything on Amazon for a couple of years | now. Got burned once too many times. I went back to buying | mostly in local stores. If they don't have what I want, I go | online to manufacturers' websites if possible, or to reputable | sellers. | m463 wrote: | I think amazon has jumped the shark[1] | | There is no practical way to buy a reputable/brand name on | amazon. | | Some brand names are "available", but it seems not officially | and people are buying them at a store and shipping them to | customers. | | Other brand names are available, but the search results are | paid (and manipulated) so they get crowded off the page by | sponsored and "5 star (2)" results. | | and so amazon as a brand is associated with junk. | | 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark | ant6n wrote: | The problem I'm having in Germany ist that only Amazon | reliable delivers to my door, usually next day. | | Every other store ships with DHL, which after several days | pretends that they ring you, when they don't, and then u can | go pick it up at the DHL store a day later. | | That's their moat. | sofixa wrote: | I think most of the complaints are directed at the | amazon.com. They do not at all reflect my experience with | amazon.fr - yes there's no name crap but there's also lots | of legit stuff, and it's the majority that comes up in | search results (confirmed through third parties | recommending the same legit stuff with amazon links). | cycomanic wrote: | I always wonder what products are so important that they | need to be delivered next day? The few times I realised I | need something urgently it typically means today and even | next day delivery is not enough, so I go to a store and | possibly pay a slightly higher price. For everything else | it doesn't really matter if it is one or 5 days. Is the | next day delivery really necessary or does it just appeal | to our impulse of needing to have it in our hands right | now? | structural wrote: | For many people, going to a store the same day is | completely impossible (not having a store within | reasonable distance that stocks any similar product). | | This is not just rural areas, either: even in major | cities items can be delivered faster than the time it | would take to find a store that carried the item, go to | the store, get it, and come home again. It's really only | suburban areas with a high density of big-box retail that | even have the option to "go out and get something" | immediately. | | Amusingly, it's also only in these suburban areas where | next day delivery even exists to compete. As an anecdote, | living in the downtown of a major American city | (population > 1million), the average Amazon delivery time | is roughly 3 days, and last mile deliveries are all | delegated to the USPS which adds significant time. | Al-Khwarizmi wrote: | For me it's more about the certainty than the rush. I | hardly ever need anything next day, but "next day" is a | concrete day, while for example "in 3-5 days" isn't. As | someone who is often not at home, I'd rather not have to | be at home or arrange for someone to be there several | consecutive days in case a package arrives. | mk89 wrote: | Weird, DHL is for me the best and most professional of all. | The experience you mentioned happens to me with DPD and | very often with GLS. Hermes is also pretty good and | professional. | | Maybe it depends on the location... | sveme wrote: | Weird. Out of the four major delivery services, DHL is by | far the best and most accommodating. | spockz wrote: | In the Netherlands they seem to ship exclusively with DHL. | And all products arrive in the evening slot. Which means | that next day delivery is usually around 21:00-22:00 which | is typically too late to be useful. | | PostNL is the most reisje local carrier here. Ups is the | best but almost never used, so far only by Apple. Dpd, GLs, | etc, are all rubbish. | throwaway0a5e wrote: | If you just want to buy chinese consumer junk of middling | quality or you are buying industrial widgets based on part | number or specification those things mostly aren't an issue. | themacguffinman wrote: | You sometimes can't even get the right thing from official | brand stores. I bought a thermal paste product from the | official Amazon ThermalGrizzly store (I did check) but Amazon | delivered me a fake. Amazon co-mingles inventory. | | The only reason I could quickly tell it was fake is because | ThermalGrizzly provides an online serial number verification | system, which isn't very common among most products. I'm not | sure I'd trust Amazon for anything. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | You have to evaluate if a product is worth counterfeiting. | For many goods the clone factories aren't going to bother. | Amazon is also a convenient onshore gateway to Aliexpress | resellers with less shipping ambiguity. | bryanrasmussen wrote: | >You have to evaluate if a product is worth | counterfeiting. | | this does not seem to be worthwhile for someone wanting | to purchase something, my estimates as to if something is | worth counterfeiting requires me to have a rather deep | understanding of the brand's importance in the world that | I would not have for any but the most notable brands, | aside from that I have to know something about how | easy/costly it is to counterfeit and get things on Amazon | to make a model in my mind if the brand was important | enough for someone to fake it. | | So, for example, if it becomes significantly cheaper to | counterfeit things the importance of brands counterfeited | (in consumer reach etc.) should drop. | | That's a lot of variables. Think I'll just go to the | store. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | A couple of weeks ago, I wanted to order a couple of pairs of | Levis jeans. | | There was _no way_ I 'd do that on Amazon. | | I got them from Costco, instead. | imissfirefox wrote: | Same situation. Got them from the Levi's store. In my mind | Amazon=counterfeits/stolen | | I'd only order very specific things from Amazon and as a | result haven't actually ordered in a couple years. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | With all the hand-wringing about how Amazon has | completely monopolized online ordering, I'd think that | having a _true_ "honest broker" storefront would be a | fairly natural way to compete. | | Amazon has become a truly awful storefront, and this has | accelerated markedly, in just the last couple of years. | tomohawk wrote: | You would think, but since Amazon is a monopoly and not | an honest broker, there's no way to compete with them. | | If the people who were supposed to be keeping them in | line actually went after them aggressively, then it might | be possible to start a competitor. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | And here's another post, I made here, about two months ago: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31625376 | | The fake is still up for sale. | vannevar wrote: | Yes, because Amazon has created perverse incentives for | anonymous manufacturers to fabricate as many "brands" as | possible, there are now so many of them that they crowd out | actual brands. The original purpose of a brand name was to | give a reputable seller a recognizable way to differentiate a | quality product or service from anonymous competitors. But | search and recommendation on Amazon favors the anonymous | sellers. | | Amazon today is less about selling things to consumers and | more about selling consumers to anonymous Chinese suppliers. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | Here's a post I made, here, about two years ago: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25582762 | | I don't think it's improved with age, but the links aren't any | good, anymore. | libraryatnight wrote: | I feel this in my soul. I wanted a new french press. I tried | three from Amazon, two of the same model arrived broken, the | third arrived appearing intact but broke on first use. I ended | up just refunding and buying one from le creuset from their | website. It arrived safe and is still alive and kicking. | | I wanted some weight sensors for an arduino project, Arrow had | them but Amazon also listed them but in bags of 4 for about the | price 2 would have cost from Arrow, plus they'd arrive faster. | They ended up being varying weight sensors ripped directly out | of various electronic scales and 3/4 didn't work. Had to order | from Arrow anyway. | | My wife wanted one of those percussive massage guns for post | workout, Amazon had the best price but then I saw in some of | the reviews people showing that the items they received from | Amazon weren't legit and the company (hypervolt iirc) wouldn't | honor any warranty from one purchased from Amazon. I was pretty | much done at that point. We ended up picking a different model | but when we did we went straight through the manufacturer. | | Shopping on Amazon sucks. | duxup wrote: | I play a lot of card games with my kids. | | I wanted a new card shuffler. | | All I got was pages of the same 3 models of shuffler from every | nonsense name brand you could think of. | | But really just 3 choices... | AlexandrB wrote: | It's like how every wall clock you buy - from Aliexpress to | Crate & Barrel - will have the same cheap mechanism running | the arms: https://www.amazon.com/Include-Movement-Mechanism- | Operated-R... | jiggawatts wrote: | I think part of the problem is that on that page there is | no obvious way to see _any_ information about the seller. I | just see a single brand name "TIKROUND", which looks like | one of those fake Chinese names mentioned in the article. | | How can I get more information about the seller!? I | scrolled through the listing twice and couldn't see any way | to get more information! | dqpb wrote: | Amazon sells toddler toys from China laced with lead. Perhaps | this is some kind of sick racist revenge for their 100 years of | shame. Bezos is happy to provide the Trojan horse for China's | gray zone guerrilla warfare because he's a tiny petty man who is | willing to betray the health and safety of regular folks to get | rich. | xanaxagoras wrote: | I stopped shopping at Amazon when they kicked Parler off of AWS. | I don't understand how any self respecting liberal could | celebrate a mega corp censoring the internet along idealogical | lines, even those who drank the insurrection kool-aid. | dylan604 wrote: | This is why you have an issue with Amazon retail? Really? Sure, | you can dislike a parent company, but the issues being | discussed in TFA and this HN thread is about the shopping | experience. Your desire to have a chat about your right wing | beliefs have no place here. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-22 23:00 UTC)