[HN Gopher] Earthgrid aims to rewire the USA using super-cheap t... ___________________________________________________________________ Earthgrid aims to rewire the USA using super-cheap tunnel tech Author : bookofjoe Score : 33 points Date : 2022-07-23 15:14 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (newatlas.com) (TXT) w3m dump (newatlas.com) | ghostly_s wrote: | What? I'm pretty sure the reason we don't have a nationwide power | grid has nothing to do with "we don't have anywhere to put the | wires!" | sparker72678 wrote: | > In its low-power state, with each torch consuming 500 kW, | Helming estimates a total power draw of 40 megawatts. If you need | to get cracking, the high-power state would draw as much as a | constant 120 MW. | | 40MW at low power. How in the world do they think they're going | to get that much power at a drill site and stay low cost? | vidanay wrote: | Monster Cables | stirlo wrote: | Receiving power from where? 40MW is the capacity of a medium | sized wind farm. The larger tunnel configuration uses 1.38GW. | That's more than most large scale coal or nuclear plants. | | Even if they could obtain the supply from a plant operator | the cabling to get to the site of the tunnel cost a fortune | pfdietz wrote: | How will they _cool_ the tunnel? That 's for a 1 meter tunnel. | If they're cooling it with air heated by 100 C, the airflow | will have to be supersonic. | Gravityloss wrote: | Hmm, liquid sodium, lead or molten salt cooling? | | Edit: 40 MW is just 150 liters per second of water with a 80 | degC temperature rise. | sudosysgen wrote: | 40MW isnt that much, water can do it (granted at a serious | cost) | nathanaldensr wrote: | For me, the keyword from the article was | | > _developing_ | | meaning they haven't completed the tech yet. This is likely a | marketing puff piece designed to drum up investment interest. | I'll believe wild claims like | | > _98% cheaper_ | | once they actually happen. | phkahler wrote: | I'm not even sure they could get that kind of power into the | small tunnels they'd be making. | | Seems to me, if they really can plasma cut rock it would be way | easier to slice out sections and remove large chunks of solid | rock. Or chop it into many smaller "bricks" and move those out. | LinuxBender wrote: | Are there any videos of this in action? I would like to see how | it deals with methane and water pockets. Is the device strong | enough to deal with the compression and blow-back? | bookofjoe wrote: | https://youtu.be/VRGufaph27E | stevenjgarner wrote: | Well it says right there in the video : "100% Renewable | Energy" => How? | alexb_ wrote: | I find it hilarious that in the stock footage of two | "workers" in the tunnel the woman is wearing high heels LMAO | robert_foss wrote: | Not exactly a video of a drill rig. | masswerk wrote: | Regarding the realism of this, I feel eerily reminded of projects | for civil use of fission bombs in the 1950s. | CapitalistCartr wrote: | Project Plowshare! | | Atoms for Peace! | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atoms_for_Peace | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote: | Meh. There are better technologies for cheap tunnel boring: | https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4687637 | thrwawy74 wrote: | I know it's not this company's focus, but I wish we had coast-to- | coast and Mexico-to-Canada tunnels for travel and defense. Just | imagine having no street-level highways, and what that would | means for animal migrations in more rural areas. Has me thinking | of some iRobot scenes. :) | clairity wrote: | that's not practical for cross-country travel, but it's | imminently possible in cities. think how much greener and human | scale cities would be if all cars were underground, including | parking. | dboreham wrote: | Don't need to imagine. Just go to Oslo. | BurningFrog wrote: | This would be great for vampires. Also incredibly expensive. | tqkxzugoaupvwqr wrote: | In other countries animal bridges connect habitats split by | highways. | | https://duckduckgo.com/?q=animal+bridge&t=h_&iax=images&ia=i... | nrp wrote: | There are over 1,000 wildlife overpasses and underpasses in | America as well: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/ | 31/climate/wildl... | phpisthebest wrote: | At this point we probably need coast-to-coast tunnels / | pipelines for moving water around | asdff wrote: | Why? There is plenty of water in the west. It's just | mismanaged by entrenched agrarian business interests. | phpisthebest wrote: | 20+ year drought, all reservoirs at record low levels does | not indicate "plenty of water" | | Sure the mismanaged water is a problem but I am not sure | baring the use for "agrarian business interests" aka Food | production, is the solution either. | | What is your solution or idea of proper management? Only | Potable uses? | asdff wrote: | Switching from flood based irrigation to spot watering. | Selecting different crops than cotton for mattresses and | pistachios or alfalfa and hay used for export. Farmers in | the West use a lot of water because they can due to their | water rights agreement, then they say "given this water | allocation, what crop will maximize my return on my | dollar" and they end up doing stuff like growing | pistachios as a result because that's where the | incentives have pushed them. Adjust the incentives and | the crop choices and practices in the west will change. | We don't need the cotton fit for mattresses or $10 bags | of pistacios to feed us. The midwest alone produces | plenty enough biomass for this country. Much of it there | as well is exported elsewhere for individualized profit. | jandrese wrote: | We probably have to rethink growing the thirstiest crops | in a semi-arid environment. | arrosenberg wrote: | > Sure the mismanaged water is a problem but I am not | sure baring the use for "agrarian business interests" aka | Food production, is the solution either. | | It really is though. They're using over 90% of the water | in the state, so where else do you suggest cutting it | from? Further, if you look into the state of California's | water rights, you will come to understand that the | problem is, in fact, a group of reactionary agri-barons | who jealously protect their ability to freeload off the | State's natural resources. | asdff wrote: | The U.S. is too bought into security theaterism for this to | happen. The border especially the southern border should feel | like a state border. Border towns already have probably half | their commuters playing this stupid "heres my papers sir" | fascist border crossing game to go work their retail job in El | Paso or wherever. It's a performance for politics at the end of | the day which means its not going away any time soon as long as | it continues to have political utility. San diego transit would | run into TJ if this world had any logic, but instead you exit | the train from san diego a few feet from the border and have to | cross by foot into tj, because security theater. | | Meanwhile the cartel just reacts by opening more labs and grow | operations stateside or digging tunnels themselves instead of | having their business be at all affected by this security | theater. | yellowapple wrote: | Finally, the technology we need to build the long-overdue | Alameda-Weehawken Burrito Tunnel. | phendrenad2 wrote: | The ONLY things stopping the US from building are paranoid | environmentalist concerns and NIMBYs (even in the middle of | nowhere, a NIMBY will surely appear to complain at the planning | meeting, possibly because they want more cash for their land). | | I don't think putting infrastructure under the ground is going to | magically make these factors go away. | robert_foss wrote: | If built using a 'plasma cutters oriented in a fibonacci spiral' | this thing will only be able to cut through conductive materials. | | Additionally it will only be able to cut tunnels through material | that don't require supporting walls. | | Not to be cynical, but this is 100% never going to see the light | of day. | BurningFrog wrote: | Tunnels typically don't see the light of day... | robert_foss wrote: | lol | moomin wrote: | Cold shower time: America does not have a problem building | infrastructure. It has a problem maintaining it. | echelon wrote: | Tell that to the California high speed rail project. Or pretty | much every other city's municipal heavy rail. Or municipal | broadband. | andbberger wrote: | america also has a problem building | astrange wrote: | It can't build it with any finite budget. | | https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/why-cant-america-build-tra... | | Though it can't maintain a lot of it either, but it's the | unsexy suburbs it can't maintain. | | https://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme | jorblumesea wrote: | More specifically, funding that maintenance. | | Federal government is a complete political mess of warring | factions, many of which see any public spending as heretical. | Local governments can't deficit spend and constituents | similarly allergic to tax increases. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-24 23:00 UTC)