[HN Gopher] Nikon releases bug fix firmware update for the 10 ye... ___________________________________________________________________ Nikon releases bug fix firmware update for the 10 year-old D7100 DSLR camera Author : giuliomagnifico Score : 275 points Date : 2022-07-27 10:22 UTC (12 hours ago) (HTM) web link (nikonrumors.com) (TXT) w3m dump (nikonrumors.com) | AndrianV wrote: | Never is too late. But, if they update = someone use this camera. | jjav wrote: | > Never is too late. But, if they update = someone use this | camera. | | Cameras don't age like software or phones, this is why I like | them. | | A 10 year old DSLR like the Nikon D7100 (I have one) is still a | very modern camera and it'll be good for a few decades to come. | | (Sadly this is why good companies like Nikon struggle | financially, since there is no forceful upgrade treadmill | unlike for phone companies. But as a consumer I absolutely love | being able to buy something solid that'll work for decades.) | JohnBooty wrote: | Yeah! | | If you don't need the video features of newer cameras, the | main advantage of newer DSLRs is improved low light | performance. | | You don't need the extra megapixels unless you have specific | needs, such as perhaps astrophotography. | | An "ancient" ~7.2MP sensor gives you 3000x2400 pixels. Plenty | for full page prints at 300DPI. | tomc1985 wrote: | Nikon fan here. | | My first camera was a D3100 in 2010ish, which I recently sold | to a friend of mine for $100 and they are still taking | fantastic photos with it. | | I have a D750 I bought when they were new and that fucker | still works fantastic, taking gorgeous photos with the right | lens. | | Even bought a D3500 cause I missed the little guy. Same | sensor as the D750 (expeed 4) just DX format and worse AF. | Weighs like a third of the D750 too! | | Nikon makes fantastic bodies and lenses. | jonah wrote: | I actually just bought a D7100 on Craigslist for a few hundred | dollars as an upgrade from my D7000. I've taken several | thousand shots on it since and really like it. It's great for | what it is - higher end APS-C camera. | | Aside from no 4K video etc it feels like a thoroughly modern | camera. The AF is good, the 24 megapixel sensor produces good | raw files, the continuous shooting rate is pretty fast (though | the buffer is small and can't shoot very frames in one blast), | the design of the camera and layout and controls are very | similar to the latest Nikon DSLRs. | hef19898 wrote: | I recently got a D300 for under 200 bucks in close to mint | condition to go with tha D700 and replace the D70 with a | scratched sensor. Great camera for my purpose, and the price | left some budget for lenses. | fbn79 wrote: | Maybe was not an issue but a requirements. Many DSLR have live | video preview and recording functionality limited in time because | of EUROPE duty classification. If the DSLR can do video without | time limitations is considered a Camcorder, and so an higher | import tax can be applied. | vwoolf wrote: | _an higher import tax can be applied._ | | That hasn't been true for years: https://www.europarl.europa.eu | /doceo/document/E-8-2016-00127...: "The Common Customs Tariff | duties are fixed by the Council on proposals of the Commission. | The Commission can in this context confirm that the product is | part of the coverage of the revised WTO[2] Information | Technology Agreement, which has been negotiated by the | Commission. This means that the customs duties for camcorder | will be removed after the revised agreement enters into force | and thus in extension benefit EU consumers." | | All camera companies should have removed their artificial | recording time limits via firmware. | post_break wrote: | That tax is now gone as of 2018 I believe. | Bedon292 wrote: | I am normally pretty good about updating firmware on stuff, but | never even thought about camera firmware until this post. Sure | enough my 8 year old Nikon has some updates. Including one from | 2020, 6 years after it came out. Not the 10 years of this one but | still impressive. | failTide wrote: | You can also install various hacked firmware if you're ever | inclined. The mods are pretty interesting, including improved | modes for astrophotography. | dylan604 wrote: | The best mod is ripping out that IR filter. Sadly, that's not | going to happen via software. That's the firmest of firmware | mods. | JohnBooty wrote: | That was some kind of privacy thing, right? So you can't | take voyeuristic revealing photos that see thru peoples' | clothes to an extent? | dylan604 wrote: | Nope. Not at all. Not sure where you got that info, but I | would question that source. | | It's because the CMOS sensors are much more sensitive to | IR than our eyes, so they expose in that frequency range | which causes the images to not develop the way we expect | them. For astrophotography, lots of very interesting data | comes from the IR bands, so removing the filter gets a | lot more details. | bliteben wrote: | Seems possible it could be for ITAR compliance. | JohnBooty wrote: | Thought I was going crazy for a second. | | I was half-remembering this debacle: | https://bettermarketing.pub/sonys-see-through-camera- | disaste... | | It seems to me that this would be possible to achieve | with any camera that captured near-IR wavelengths, with | the appropriate filters or firmware hacks. In addition to | what you posted, might this also be on camera makers' | minds? | isaacfrond wrote: | Well, whatever the reason, be it personal irritation, or PR | purpopose, one hurray for Nikon and against consumerism. | IYasha wrote: | This makes me wonder: what's the oldest product to receive | firmware update in history? | | Some servers get firmware updates for more than 10 years and I | consider it an acceptable minimum. ) | babypuncher wrote: | That is going to be a pretty fuzzy rabbit hole. | | I've seen accounts of industrial equipment where the original | microcomputers from the '70s/'80s have been replaced with | modern microcontrollers or single board computers like the | Raspberry Pi. Does it count as a "firmware update" if the new | firmware comes with a new embedded computer to run it? | twbarr wrote: | It's gotta be embedded stuff. The Space Shuttle GPC was | constantly reprogrammed, including on the pad. They've sent | patches to the Voyager spacecraft as recently as a few years | ago [1]. 45 years, not too bad! | | 1 - https://www.livescience.com/nasa-makes-contact- | voyager-2-lon... | radicality wrote: | I have a Fuji camera, and there's a new firmware update available | which 'fixes' a potential dataloss condition by setting the max | number of objects to be stored per a DCF folder to be 999 from | 9999.I haven't yet updated since my workflow has a bunch of | scripts which expected filenames per folder to be 4 digits. | | I should update my scripts, but my immediate observation though | were that this seems like a bandaid solution? And not sure if it | even follows the spec, afaik it allows for up to 9999 _files_ per | directory but some DCF objects can take up multiple files (eg a | THM thumbnail and the JPEG). The details on the bug are sparse | too, how is MacOS not seeing data written to an SDXC card, is it | corrupting it? Is it a filesystem limitation for 9999 files, or | an actual Mac OS bug? | | firmware - https://fujifilm-x.com/global/global- | news/2022/0202_4199100/ | | spec for how things are named - | https://www.jeita.or.jp/japanese/standard/book/CP-3461B_E/#t... | Tepix wrote: | Hey perhaps Panasonic will finally get their webcam software for | their high end cameras fixed and take it out of beta (where it | has been since the pandemic). In my dreams, they would also | create a version for Apple silicon... | jonahhorowitz wrote: | Just use a $12-$15 HDMI->USB capture card off eBay/Amazon. They | work incredibly well and you don't have to deal with buggy | software. I've been using my GH3 as a webcam since the | beginning of the pandemic. | | I bought this one, but there are a lot of sellers for that | exact product: https://www.ebay.com/itm/184350601059 | asdff wrote: | Good. Honestly DSLRs have gotten "more than good enough" for just | about anything you'd throw at it 15 years ago. Newer DSLRs might | be a little stronger in lower light but not by as much as you'd | expect. Video capabilities are also a lot better in the new ones, | but if you don't care about that, there isn't much you are losing | buying a camera like a 5d mkiii (or even an older 5d) today. | Unless maybe you are a pixel peeper. | pvaldes wrote: | Only for windows or Mac, it seems. | phcreery wrote: | I have a Nikon D7100 and was just thinking about updating the | firmware yesterday since there probably won't be anymore patches. | I am pleasantly surprised by this. | lizardactivist wrote: | It has always been difficult to beat the Japanese when it comes | to quality and service, and I am frequently reminded of just how | seriously they take it. | [deleted] | samwestdev wrote: | I live in Japan and have to deal with Japanese customers on a | daily base. As they say here: "The customer is God". Even one | unsatisfied customer is going to destroy your reputation so | companies are real careful here. | rossmohax wrote: | How does it work? What superpowers customers have in Japan, | which they don't have anywhere else? Few years ago Sony had | global week long outage, no one could play multiplayer, yet | it is still a successful company. | Sardtok wrote: | It's more a cultural idea that you should treat/consider | the customer very highly. It comes from the honour system | of inner and outer circles. So conceptually the customer | (honoured guest, okyakusama) outranks you. | lizardactivist wrote: | You can't compare the Japanese as a people to, say, the | typical American, who as a customer thinks the whole world | is owed to him. | | The Japanese are far less demanding, and understanding and | forgiving of accidents like these. | babypuncher wrote: | So basically the signal-to-noise ratio in Japan is much | greater than we are used to stateside, leading to actual | problems being more visible and customer service | departments taking them more seriously. | sdfjkl wrote: | Wish someone would fix some of the more severe bugs in the Nikon | 1 AW1, which they abandoned soon after release :-/ | | There was a single firmware update, and among other stuff, the | GPS location still confuses East and West afterwards. | perardi wrote: | I think Nikon would prefer to forget the whole Nikon 1 | misadventure. | ho_schi wrote: | Well done Nikon :) This shall be the industry standard. | techwiz137 wrote: | Except same thing on D3400. | rplst8 wrote: | I wonder if us D800 owners will ever get a fix for the awful | right side focus issues that plagued that camera. | buildbot wrote: | Radical PoV: All hardware should require the release of | sources/documentation after a certain period as a way of | recycling consumer e-waste. | imwillofficial wrote: | This is the type of product and customer commitment we need more | of. | pcurve wrote: | you might like this video (has English subtitle) | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa20iG8yplM | | A pencil sharpener maker provides free (most of the time) | warranty service to their products, including ones purchased | over 40 years ago. | | Apparently many Koreans have sentimental values attached to | these devices and can't bare to throw them away. | ece wrote: | The PS3 got an update in may. | lizardactivist wrote: | Really? What was the update? | | It also reminds me of how I have not used any newer video | game console than the PS2. I'm so behind the times! | ece wrote: | They've added some keys to keep BR discs playing in recent | updates, and apparently you can't create a PSN account from | a PS3 anymore. There were "quality" and "performance" fixes | until 2020. | | It's my last console, the first was a SNES followed by a | PSP. I used OtherOS but then upgraded anyway when it was | gone. The Youtube/Netflix apps still work fine. I'm going | try CFW one of these days on my early slim, just to know | the temperature. https://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/Thermal | babypuncher wrote: | I am surprised AACS still bothers issuing new batches of | keys. Blu-Ray copy protection has been pretty thoroughly | broken for over a decade now. The fact that most people | no longer have optical drives on their computers is a | bigger barrier to casual movie piracy than AACS. | hef19898 wrote: | Seeing this on the HN front page the day Nikon told me they did | the necessary service and "repairs" on my 10+ year old D700 is | purely coincidence I'm sure. | perardi wrote: | I had a D700. | | What a camera. Not surprised you had it serviced--if it's a | reasonably cheap repair job, that is still a great body if you | don't care about resolution. (And people put way too much | emphasis on resolution.) | | I swear that thing ran on fusion or zero-point energy. It could | be nostalgia or just me being old, but I am sure it got vastly | better battery life than my current mirrorless camera. | asdff wrote: | DSLRs always lap mirrorless cameras for battery life. There's | practically no battery drain when its on until you actually | shoot the shot since you are taking in light with a passive | prism to compose your shot, versus the sensor having to be on | and a display somewhere being powered with the mirrorless | camera. Sony A7 shoots like 400 shots per charge. 5d mk4 | lasts for twice as many shots otoh. | hef19898 wrote: | It's my dad's back-up body, I switched his D200 back im | exchange and got a D300 with, IIRC a shuttet count of | 30k-ish, as a back-up. Service was 90 bucks, sensor and | mirror cleaning, firmware update, general service, AF and | exposure config, laser callibration of the mirrors and | prisms. Rather decent IMHO, I have yet to get it back, | looking forward to it! | | Battery life if great, during a full week in Iceland I | charged the two batteries once, and propably wouod have made | without charging. Resultion is, at least for me, only proplem | when it comes to cropping. Not cropping in changing the | format or to cut of the corners (the D700 viewer covers only | 95% of the picture which can lead to some stuff at the | borders of teh image you don't want there) but rather | croppong out stuff like bird to enlarge them. Then, and only | then, the 12 MP are an issue. Otherwise a lower resolution | forces you sinpmy take better pictures in the first place. | And for online use 12 MP are plenty anyway, I don't plan to | print a house wall with my photos. And lower resolution means | smaller files, which a benefit in itself. | | I love that camera, if simply because it gave me back the joy | of photography. | perardi wrote: | I had to go back and dig up a D700 photo. | | https://www.flickr.com/photos/perardi/8836490860/in/album-7 | 2... | | Yup. Image quality holds up! | | ...OK, that's not entirely fair. It's more that the image | quality of the _absurdly_ expensive lens I rented for that | weekend holds up. | | https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera- | le... | hef19898 wrote: | Putting 1k bucks in a lense is such better investment | than putting the same in a camera body when it comes to | image quality. Another benefit of a low resolution body, | lenses don't need to be as absurdly good as they have to | be for 24/66 MP plus bodies abd are correspondingly | cheaper. Which leaves more money to travel to all those | nice places to take nice pictures and enjoy yourself. Not | that I would say no to Z9 with corresponding glass if | someone gave it to me! | someweirdperson wrote: | > Putting 1k bucks in a lense [...] | | The one linked by the parent is $5.5k. | jjav wrote: | > It could be nostalgia or just me being old, but I am sure | it got vastly better battery life than my current mirrorless | camera. | | Not nostalgia, DSLRs get vastly better battery life than | mirrorless cameras. Because there is nothing using | electricity in the optical path, you're just looking through | the lens. A mirrorless on the other hand is constantly using | power for the screen. | turminal wrote: | > but I am sure it got vastly better battery life than my | current mirrorless camera. | | That sounds about right. Mirrorless cameras need to do a lot | of image processing and that affects battery life | significantly. | HPsquared wrote: | Definitely, compare to a DSLR which is only fully powered- | on when your finger is on the shutter button. Otherwise | it's basically asleep 99% of the time, if the screen's off. | dylan604 wrote: | and you know, run the screens that affect the battery life | significantly. | omnibrain wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion | snak wrote: | Apparently also known as the "Baader-Meinhof phenomenon". | uncletammy wrote: | Smells like class action damage control to me | BolexNOLA wrote: | Honestly? Yeah. HN is (I'm pretty sure) the only site I visit | where uBlock and brave both detect nothing to block/restrict. | jeanlucas wrote: | Everyone is an NPC, you are the only person on the internet. | balentio wrote: | The main playable characters all have Nikon cameras. | hef19898 wrote: | Thanks for confirming all my doubts! My cat is real so. I | think... | function_seven wrote: | > _My cat is real so I think_ | | This reads like something Descartes would write, if he were | influenced by Dali. | | (Yes I removed the period to make it work better. Necessary | to reach 3 Cuil) | multjoy wrote: | It's a reference to HHGTG (the radio show, specifically) | when they found the true ruler of the universe. | paulmd wrote: | Make it to the HN frontpage often? Oh, what am I saying? Of | course you don't. | n0th3r-curious wrote: | Interesting to see many technical comments... | | I have one, and will update the firmware. Pardon my dumb comment | - guessing whether they implemented some kind of upgrade where it | has option to connect to wifi... | codys wrote: | Camera software is an area that is frustratingly closed off, and | where manufacturers regularly differentiate new/more expensive | cameras with firmware differences: subject detection, auto focus, | drive modes (pre-capture, higher frame rates, etc), file format | support (HEIC, compressed raw, colorspaces), ui features (how | custom modes work, menu systems, etc). | | Competition in this space driven by a provider that doesn't have | a motive to convince users to buy the next new camera (ie: open | source software) would be very useful to users. | | Sony and Panasonic cameras (and perhaps other manufacturers) are | running Linux (and release some of the third party source code | they include in their products, but the amount of reverse | engineering that has been done on those camera's software. | | Canon uses a custom RTOS (DryOS), and lots of work has been done | to extend the existing Canon firmware to enhance its capabilities | (Magic Lantern[1] and CHDK[2]), but as far as I know fully open | software for these devices doesn't exist. | | Camera capabilities these days are highly software dependent, and | the functionality of dedicated cameras is held back by subpar | software development practices and a lack of pressure to make | things better. | | 1: https://magiclantern.fm/ 2: https://chdk.fandom.com/wiki/CHDK | dylan604 wrote: | It's not just that they want you to buy new cameras (of course | they do), but they also do it to protect different verticals | within their company. If a stills camera can shoot video of the | same quality but much lower price, then that takes sales from | the provideo cameras. | codys wrote: | That's a great point, and shows up in annoying ways in Sony's | camera line up in whether "high frame rate" support exists. | For Sony cameras, HFR implies "can capture a limited length | (seconds, typically) of footage at a higher frame rate | (240fps, 480fps, 960fps, etc) and reduced resolution as frame | rate increases (this is not the same as normal video modes | and S&Q video modes, which don't have time limits like | these). | | Sony includes this feature on cameras without interchangeable | lenses (ie: "point and shoots"), and on their high end cinema | cameras, but not on their mirrorless (interchangeable lens, | but not considered cinema cameras) line. | | Seems pretty clear this is designed to avoid their mirrorless | lineup have a feature that might make it competitive with | their cinema line. But they're ok including it on the point | and shoot line because that already is well differentiated | from the cinema camera line. | JohnBooty wrote: | Is there any chance that some of this limiting has | legitimate hardware reasons? | | It's been over a decade since I really followed the digital | camera scene. | | At the time, DSLRs were just beginning to get 1080p/720p | video capabilities. There were frustrating time limits of | course, even then. But, I recall that some of the cameras | heated up pretty significantly when capturing video. This | was sometimes cited as a reason for such time limitations | on video recording. | | I'm not sure if that is possibly a "legitimate" physical | reason for the limitation today, or if it ever was in the | first place. Any thoughts on that? | dylan604 wrote: | I've always given benefit of the doubt that the limited | duration of S&Q modes in stills cameras is related to the | max throughput of the recording media. 120+fps at 4K | resolution starts demanding quite a bit of sustainable | bandwidth. Shooting to SD cards might be a limitation and | explains why the pro-video cameras have much more expensive | record formats. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> Camera software is an area that is frustratingly closed off, | and where manufacturers regularly differentiate new/more | expensive cameras with firmware differences:[...]_ | | Why is this frustrating? How is this different than anything | else tech related that's in the business of making money? | | Every company trims the features they give their customers | access to depending on the amount they're willing to pay. | | Camera companies aren't charities, they need to make money for | their shareholders. All that sunk R&D has to be recouped. | TaylorAlexander wrote: | It is frustrating when any company does it! Artificially | software limiting features reduces the utility of devices | across the board, which sees those devices going in to | landfills sooner. All of the energy that goes in to mining, | transportation, and manufacturing of the materials is less | effectively utilized, so these practices lead to higher | emissions, more waste, and more rapid environmental | degradation. They also contribute to stratification of our | economy, as users have to pay more money more often to get | the features they need, raising shareholder profits off the | backs of consumers. | | This idea that we can manufacture something complex and then | artificially limit its features to run profit seeking schemes | is one that makes sense in a pure business sense, but in the | end is often harmful to society. We don't have to do this. We | could have a fully functioning free market economy even in a | world where business norms involved open source software and | open source hardware. Businesses would charge more for | hardware but it would provide value to customers for so much | longer, that down market customers could just buy used and | get the same features they would have gotten if they bought a | new, feature limited device from a closed source vendor. | | "Then people would rip them off!" | | No, then people would build off of their work and compete on | other things like price or other features. We can see as a | case study the world of open source 3D printers, where few | vendors sell direct clones of other models, as they tend to | use other manufacturing methods and change the design for | their factory, adding differentiating features along the way. | | "Then no one would invest!" | | No, instead of less frequent large investments, you would see | more frequent small investments - investors helping a factory | buy one more machine to meet production goals for the next | quarter with a new design no one has yet seen. First mover | advantage is real. | | Notably, even the libertarians at the Mises Institute oppose | intellectual property restrictions, which are an artificial | government monopoly on information, an extreme restriction on | free markets! | nicoburns wrote: | It's frustrating because much better do devices that do | things that no available device can do could be made | available if was more open. It's different to say, computers, | where Linux is available and can be customised to your | heart's desire. It's not different to lots of other areas. | Those are also frustrating. | daleharvey wrote: | Because its fustrating to have things be worse because rich | people need to hoard more wealth? | seabird wrote: | This isn't just market segmentation. It's a frustrating, | recurring theme among Japanese hardware manufacturers where | great products are negatively impacted or outright hamstrung | by shit software support. I run into it in embedded firmware | and industrial controls all the time. I think it's a side | effect of the corporate culture there, which is how it | manages to cut into multiple market segments. Having to pass | on good offerings because the software is too bad to stomach | feels bad. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | I get what your saying but how is their artificial firmware | limitations different than Apple's own market segmentation | practices? Or Google's? Or Microsoft's? Or Hashicorp? Or | Docker? | foobarian wrote: | I think the frustrating thing is they can (potentially) | afford much less to fund a competent software team, so | the end product is much less than it could be. Which is | unfortunate because of how good the hardware is. | Der_Einzige wrote: | You can't pirate hardware. | mrandish wrote: | Magic Lantern is an awesome example of the value which can be | created by collaborative open source, despite the hardware | manufacturer doing nothing to document or help. It's great | because it's also very low risk for the user since the firmware | mods are loaded on every boot, the camera is never perma- | modified reducing the chances of bricking the device. | | I wish one of the major mirrorless camera manufacturers would | decide to openly endorse an open source model as an optional | alternative to their own factory firmware. | bsder wrote: | > Camera software is an area that is frustratingly closed off | | Then build an open source camera body? We have the ability | nowadays. | | I'd guess they only real problem is getting a decent sensor. | But I'd be surprised if you can't get something comparable out | of China. | | If no one is doing it, well, then that's a data point in and of | itself, no? | brudgers wrote: | _Camera software is an area that is frustratingly closed off_ | | Try to get Nikon replacement parts. | | Or make your own color film. | | Which reminds me that fully mechanical cameras are eminently | hackable. | | And that reminds me that _I_ don 't want to wade into the | turing tarpit of custom software on _my_ cameras. | | Hell, I don't even want autofocus anymore. I want an optical | system that is easy to focus manually. | | YMMV. | jug wrote: | Maybe I'm a cynic here but such a specific, single bug fix makes | it look like it's for PR reasons and headlines like this. | punnerud wrote: | And shouldn't they have fixed this 9 3/4 years ago? | p1mrx wrote: | A wizard is never late, Harry. | _Algernon_ wrote: | Real altruism isn't real. So what? | Jiejeing wrote: | Or the most probable thing is that someone internally was | annoyed by the bug and got permission to release. A single | update to a 10 years old camera on an apparently abandoned | product line is not something that gets a big amount of PR | coverage, especially since nikon DLSRs had very few updates | ever. Unless it is part of an up-and-coming new updating scheme | (which I very much doubt), it will not make much difference | except a little goodwill from D7100 owners. | giuliomagnifico wrote: | PR reasons on a DSLR camera now?! I don't think so. | onion2k wrote: | This makes Nikon look like a company that supports _all_ its | products in the long term. That 's some seriously good PR. | formerly_proven wrote: | They do just that, though. | jjav wrote: | > This makes Nikon look like a company that supports all | its products in the long term. | | Not "look like", that's how they operate. I love it, wish | all companies were committed to quality and longevity, it | would be the kind of world I'd like to live in. | | Nikon is also pretty obsessive about compatibility, I can | mount lenses from the 70s on my D7100 and the features | work. | | https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/compatibility-lens.htm | hef19898 wrote: | Using a FTZ adapter you can those lenses on a Z9 as well. | Not sure about image quality so, those old film era | lenses seems, from what I read since I have zero | experience, to underperform on modern digital bodies. | Doesn't make the lenses any worse or the compatability | any less imoressive. | giuliomagnifico wrote: | Yes I agree, a PR for the company, not for the camera. | Indeed is a good thing this support, for that I posted it. | A firmware update for a 10y old camera, and a DSLR camera | that also the lenses are discontinued. Well, I'm glad for | it. | hef19898 wrote: | Nikon is pretty good at supporting legacy products, including | repairs. Up to the point they almost are embarassed that spare | parts are not available anymore. And hey, since their cameras | routinely exceed predicted shutter life by a factor of two that | is a good thing! | pastaguy1 wrote: | ah yes, the PR PR | selfhoster11 wrote: | It could be just an instance of | https://twitter.com/swaglord__420/status/1377051721655066629 | | I'd totally consider something like that, if an issue was | bugging me enough. | tambourine_man wrote: | I hope that's a joke. I did laugh | hef19898 wrote: | If it is not a joke it is a badass move. It also shows that | user love and deeply care about your product. And I laughed | as well! | bornfreddy wrote: | The commit was (supposedly) made on March 32nd. | Loic wrote: | Sorry but no. This is in the DNA of Nikon[0][1]. | | [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23862471 | | [1]: https://petapixel.com/2020/07/16/nikon-issues-recall- | for-16-... | justin66 wrote: | I think we can all agree it would be better if they issue press | releases and advertisements when they want good PR. Fixing bugs | is some underhanded stuff. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | They are dead serious about supporting legacy stuff, and it | long predates the advent of PR. They've been doing it for 100 | years, and it's part of their DNA. | | If you go to one of their service centers (there's a lot fewer | of them, nowadays), in the back, you will often find camera | bodies and parts for cameras that are fifty years old. They | won't necessarily fix it under warranty, but they'll definitely | try to fix it, if possible. | | When 9/11 happened, they had cameras in the Melville service | center from The Pile, covered with that dust, and they busted | their butts to get them fixed up and back out there. | | They are a very old company, and take their work seriously. | There's lots of things to complain about, with them, but they | are serious about Legacy. | _tik_ wrote: | I am still servicing my camera from the 80s and lens from the | 70s with them. Nikon warranty in my country does not cover | Internationally. But I am usually able to get servicing in | every country even after out of the warranty period. Nikon | waives my service fee quite frequently too. | tambourine_man wrote: | PR is as old as humanity. | | But even the name predates Nikon by almost two decades | according to Wikipedia. | kloch wrote: | It's ok to praise/reward companies for doing the Right | Thing, even if they try to make the most of it with PR. | tambourine_man wrote: | Sure. I didn't say it isn't. | gzalo wrote: | My guess is that an employee wanted to use it as a webcam via | hdmi and was annoyed by the time limitation, so they fixed it | themselves :P | shultays wrote: | One employee wouldn't have that much freedom to release patches | like this. Or maybe he is an old guard that was annoyed by the | time limitation and no one was able to say no to him | vanderZwan wrote: | Don't forget it's a Japanese company. Which, as I understand, | has a culture where people can't get fired, only promoted to | positions where they do nothing and are out of people's way. | Maybe it was one of those people. | gfaster wrote: | Japanese companies are also stereotypically drowning in | bureaucracy and have strict adherence to hierarchy. Maybe | it was a manager that got annoyed and had an underling do | it? | manceraio wrote: | That sounds about right. But how come a manager having a | 10 year old camera and not a newest model? | dylan604 wrote: | Sometimes, you just love a device and don't want to use | something new. I still shoot a 5DmkII, and there's really | only one feature that is available in the newer models | that I'd love to have on my older body (specifically | number of focus points). I've used all of the models | after that including mirrorless, but this older body | still my fave. | | So the 10 year old camera isn't that strange to me. | snerbles wrote: | Fax machines are still regularly used for business | purposes in Japan. | | While uploading some trip photos at an Akihabara cafe in | 2018, I noticed that my laptop at the time (a used Dell | XPS from 2015) appeared significantly newer than the | laptops of the other patrons. There were even a couple of | integrated trackballs, which I haven't seen in a laptop | since the late '90s. I also suddenly realized I was a bit | under-dressed in a plain polo shirt and slacks. | radicaldreamer wrote: | Panasonic Let's Note machines look ancient but are packed | with the latest processor/memory guts. | washadjeffmad wrote: | Rolling stones gather no moss. | herpderperator wrote: | Promoted... with increased pay? | hinkley wrote: | I don't know if it's still true but at one point it was | said that unlike in the US, the corner office was a mark | of shame, because you go into that office, you close the | door, and from then on your interactions with the rest of | the employees are curtailed. | | You get that office not because you've done things they | thought were great, but because you've done things they | thought weren't and they want you to slow your roll. | You're a fish in a bowl. | m463 wrote: | or it prevents use of 3rd party toner cartridges. (joking) | that_guy_iain wrote: | My guess is a major client got pissed about this reported it | ages ago it got no trancation. The client is currently super | pissy about other things and mentioned this in their list of | greivances and it gets fixed now because Nikon is worried that | the client will go elsewhere. | JohnBooty wrote: | Could also have been a task assigned to a junior engineer or | something, to see how they handled such a project - one with | real world stakes, but minor ones. | | Alternatively, could have been a junior engineer doing it of | their own accord, to show the bosses what they were capable of. | mosselman wrote: | This is great. I have a D5000 lying around, I've given up on DSLR | photography on holiday since my iPhone is smaller and better at | video and photography in dark places and about 10000x smaller and | lighter, but I just couldn't sell my Nikon. Happy to see the | company being dedicated to its customers after such a long time. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-07-27 23:00 UTC)