[HN Gopher] Outside the safe operating space of a new planetary ... ___________________________________________________________________ Outside the safe operating space of a new planetary boundary for PFAS Author : rntn Score : 72 points Date : 2022-08-02 18:29 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (pubs.acs.org) (TXT) w3m dump (pubs.acs.org) | downvotetruth wrote: | Minimum of another 3 years before any (EU) expected regulatory | progress https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/efforts-underway-in- | euro... while everyone else continues to be guinea pigs. | javert wrote: | Does this mean it isn't safe to live right next to the ocean? | | I'm referring to the following sentence in the abstract: | | > Levels of PFAAs in atmospheric deposition are especially poorly | reversible because of the high persistence of PFAAs and their | ability to continuously cycle in the hydrosphere, including on | sea spray aerosols emitted from the oceans. | Phlarp wrote: | https://www.semi.org/en/blogs/semi-news/fluorinated-chemical... | | Big tech has a big PFA problem | ars wrote: | Those at least can be contained, and hopefully reused, but at | least disposed of properly. | | Ski Wax PFA is much worse. | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004565352... | those are just left to be shed in the snow, and they don't | vanish once they are in the snow. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Also a lot of lubricants in bicycle gear and some rainproof | gear uses PFAS, which is again slowly rubbing off onto your | skin or going airbone. | orangepurple wrote: | It's sad because PTFE is the best dry lubricant but you can | get close with Tungsten Disulfide nanoparticles. Hexagonal | boron nitride is a good bicycle lubricant additive too and | it can actually photocatalytically degrade environmental | PFAS! | | https://ceramics.org/ceramic-tech-today/ceramic- | video/video-... | staindk wrote: | GORE-TEX materials had a PFAS problem but have been PFAS- | free since 2012 or 2014 or so, if I recall correctly. | jabl wrote: | The Gore-Tex membrane itself is apparently(?) PFAS-free | since some years, however Gore-Tex materials usually have | a second waterproofing treatment (a surface coating | called DWR, durable water repellent) which, drumroll, | contains PFAS. Cheeky buggers, convincing people they had | solved the problem years ago. ;) | | Apparently they have some improvement in the pipeline | that will bring about really PFAS-free product in the | next few years or so. | https://saferchemicals.org/2021/09/30/gore-tex- | manufacturer-... | staindk wrote: | Ah shit. Thanks for the link - good to know. | | Cheeky buggers indeed haha | brnt wrote: | PFAS-free usually means PFAS-lookalike AFAIK. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Same as the plastics marketing with the "BPA free" claim, | they will just use some other Bisphenol and call it a | day. | mperham wrote: | Can someone explain "planetary boundary" in this context? What | does the first sentence mean? | majormunky wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_boundaries | | "Planetary boundaries is a concept highlighting human-caused | perturbations of Earth systems making them relevant in a way | not accommodated by the environmental boundaries separating the | three ages within the Holocene epoch." | revolvingocelot wrote: | "Planetary boundaries is a concept highlighting human-caused | perturbations of Earth systems [...] The framework is based on | scientific evidence that human actions, especially those of | industrialized societies since the Industrial Revolution, have | become the main driver of global environmental change. | According to the framework, "transgressing one or more | planetary boundaries may be deleterious or even catastrophic | due to the risk of crossing thresholds that will trigger non- | linear, abrupt environmental change within continental-scale to | planetary-scale systems."[2]" | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_boundaries | | The first sentence suggests that the study's authors are | concerned that PFAS and its similar cousins represent a non- | linear, large-scale environmental threat. | bobbylarrybobby wrote: | Ah, so a boundary is between continuous "regimes" governed by | a single behavior; crossing the boundary means moving into a | different, as-yet unexplored regime. | revolvingocelot wrote: | Indeed -- in this case, a large-scale diffusion of a very | stable family of waterproofing chemicals into the, uh, | global water cycle. The idea is that it's possible for | human activity to fundamentally change the nature of some | system whose behaviour we think of as stable and | inviolable. Considering how goddamn important water is to | basically everything in the biosphere, I think of it as | more an eaten-by-a-grue "unexplored", rather than enticing- | terra-nova, style of thing. | erk__ wrote: | In Denmark the talk have mostly been about PFAS contaminated | meat. One of the first places a severe contamination was found | was on a building used by the fire brigade for testing and cows | were grassing there as well. Since then a lot of other places ha | e been tested and many more have been declared as potential | places. | | I think yesterday the news were about if it was safe to | breastfeed while you may have heightened levels of it. The new | guidelines was retracted because most of the scientists behind it | disagreed with the conclusion based upon newer evidence. So it | getting a reevaluation | kurupt213 wrote: | This is not good. Even if production completely stopped today, | levels would continue to rise for years in the environment as the | materials are washed away from our modern lives and | infrastructure. | ephbit wrote: | > It is hypothesized that environmental contamination by per- and | polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) defines a separate planetary | boundary and that this boundary has been exceeded. | zaroth wrote: | The most "amusing" example of PFA use I've heard of is in | waterproofing the compostable paper single-use food containers, | and most ridiculous of all, paper straws. | | Talk about cutting off one's own nose. | | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33770693/ | rthomas6 wrote: | Even worse: Dental floss. Oral-B Glide is made with it. | zaroth wrote: | Please say this isn't true... | | What's the point of an EPA guideline if we're literally | flossing with it? | | This seems to be the study that first found an association | between Oral-B flossing and higher levels of PFAS in the | body; | | https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/636598 | Zamicol wrote: | Just looked it up because of your comment. Plackers contain | PFAS in the form of PTFE (Teflon). I play with those in my | mouth all the time. Holy cow. | jjoonathan wrote: | > While the plastic straws had no measurable PFAS, 21 PFAS were | detected in the paper and other plant-based straws | | Wow. That's evil. | ch4s3 wrote: | well, otherwise they disintegrate immediately. Of course some | people pointed this out up front when banning straws was | first proposed. | i_am_proteus wrote: | If only there were some natural plant-based material that | could be used as a straw... perhaps a byproduct of cereal | cultivation. | sillystuff wrote: | Sibling comment mentions using the stems of grain crops as | natural drinking straws. This was done, in the past, and is | the origin of the word "straws" for the modern plastic | variety. | | Historically, straws were also made from waxed paper. | | The issue isn't that plastic straws were banned, it is that | plastic straws were banned and no additional guidance was | provided e.g., mandating paper straws with natural wax | coatings. This combined with corporate greed led to | companies putting out the most profitable product within | constraints of the law-- health and environmental safety be | damned. | | The first paragraph of the following article describes both | types of historical drinking straws: | | https://www.encyclopedia.com/manufacturing/news-wires- | white-... | | edit: clarity | ch4s3 wrote: | Waxed straws used paraffin which is made from petroleum | anyway, and they still get soaked through and collapse | like the shitty PFAS coated straws. I know because | they're still made and I've used one, and the attic you | posted mentions that draw back. | | Straws made from plant stalks simply aren't suited to | mass distribution. They aren't uniform, can't easily be | sanitized before packaging, they're fragile, and still | leak and get soaked. | | The problem isn't "corporate greed" it's that there | aren't good alternatives to plastic for disposable | straws. | [deleted] | ars wrote: | Yup, I've heard the same. I refuse to use paper straws as a | result. | mturmon wrote: | Another disastrous externality. Cheap to produce, hard to contain | after it's out there. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | We alway like to reference the EU as regulatory example. But in | this case despite the : | | - Ample evidence of health hazard (with seeping of PFAS into | ground water) - Temporary shutdowns - Environmental fines | | both 3M factories are still very much in operation: | | Zwijndrecht, Belgium Dordrecht, Netherlands | yrgulation wrote: | EU regulation is mainly a means to protect the eu's internal | market. For instance you cant buy vehicles made in america due | to prohibitive duties because they dont meet euro requirements. | But you can buy highly polluting german vehicles, no problem. | Easiest way to restrict goods without explicitly doing so. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-02 23:00 UTC)