[HN Gopher] GlobalFoundries joins Google's open source silicon i... ___________________________________________________________________ GlobalFoundries joins Google's open source silicon initiative Author : proppy Score : 113 points Date : 2022-08-03 17:19 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (opensource.googleblog.com) (TXT) w3m dump (opensource.googleblog.com) | ricksunny wrote: | Been a while since I was in the semiconductor industry, but it | looks like this open-sourcing is intended to free up the | ecosystem from dependence on Cadence EDA. Nice, could open up | opportunity for creation of a lot of cottage fabless | semiconductor startups. (does anyone known whether Cadence had | ever gotten on the freemium offering model?) | redanddead wrote: | I might get some hate for this, but Google seems to be doing some | really cool things, like in fintech as well as this silicon | project. Google Finance is one of the only players I've seen with | an interest of opening things up when so much of the industry is | about pushing others out and restricting access. Like for example | the CME deal, to open source live, low latency stock market data. | Bloomberg might let you rent it for 25k a year if you're lucky. | Google? Yeah just hook into the websocket bro, it's free. | | Someone's gotta do it | | Most of the stock market data the avg person sees is 15 minutes | delayed by request of the NYSE, and in a world where trades are | reaching the 3 millisecond and below mark, that's a very long | time. So Google opening up what could be <20ms data might be able | to help some applications. Not saying it's a silver bullet | either. | | I wish they would take on even more big projects that need to be | tackled. Like I want to see a google branded remote controlled | barge out in the pacific garbage patch that the public is | controlling through a google web app or some other insane, good | projects. Idk when you deal with finance companies all day, even | google seems moral. | | However, it's not looking good this quarter for all tech cos | beambot wrote: | It's "free" until it's sunset with no notice. Google is | _notorious_ for doing this. RIP Reader. | api wrote: | Wow, how things have changed. I've been here since back when | Google could do no wrong. Now they're a poster child for shady | surveillance capitalism. | | Same with Elon Musk. I remember him being compared to a comic | book hero. Now he's an alt-right racist (if you are a leftist) | or an evil globalist technocrat (if you are a rightist). | kranke155 wrote: | If you're Ukrainian he's a National hero. | mistrial9 wrote: | > poster child for shady surveillance capitalism | | as well they should be, they carried it forward like Atlas | carrying the globe.. in the beginning it was competition, | then, we could not stop.. | scarface74 wrote: | From day one Google's business plan was ads - except for the | brief time where they were selling "Google Search | Appliances". | | Every company whose business model isn't "I give them money | and they give me stuff" is shady. | mlindner wrote: | > Same with Elon Musk. I remember him being compared to a | comic book hero. Now he's an alt-right racist (if you are a | leftist) or an evil globalist technocrat (if you are a | rightist). | | He hasn't changed though, and little has changed in what he's | actually doing too. If anything, he's more mellow now than he | was when he was younger. People's impressions of him have | been highly twisted IMO. | api wrote: | Yeah, he's neither a comic book hero nor a monster. He's a | rich dude who's pretty smart and decided to risk a bunch of | his helping build up companies working in important | innovative fields, but unfortunately he also trolls and | overshares on Twitter like a 13 year old. | mszcz wrote: | > Like for example the CME deal, to open source live, low | latency stock market data. Bloomberg might let you rent it for | 25k a year if you're lucky. Google? Yeah just hook into the | websocket bro, it's free. | | Cursory search turned up nothing for me. Can you point me in | the direction where I can find free (or low cost) market data | that you mentioned? | redanddead wrote: | https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/financial- | services/buil... | | This link has more info | geph2021 wrote: | That seems really cool, thanks for posting. However, I did | notice that their demo does not seem to have any live | prices right now (the demo is a couple years old, so maybe | no longer live): https://showcase.withgoogle.com/marketdata | | Also, to the point about Bloomberg's high subscription | fees, they provide all imaginable financial data under the | sun. This google demo with CME is just CME data, which is a | small, albeit important, part of market data, let alone the | broader financial data. Furthermore, in many cases the data | itself is owned by the exchanges, so Bloomberg's fees | reflect passing on the (at times exorbitant) exchange fees. | NYSE, NASDAQ, CME, etc.. are historically the ones that are | the gatekeepers of the data and putting up financial | barriers. | redanddead wrote: | Yeah the bloomberg terminal is still good value if you're | going to be using that data, and a relatively good price. | Good point about the exchanges | gregsadetsky wrote: | I see that CME is using GCP to offer its data stream, but | it doesn't seem free. | | "This innovative collaboration with Google Cloud will not | only make it easier for _our clients_ to access the data | [...] CME Group _customers_ will be able to access all | real-time CME Group data [...] " (emphasis mine) [0] | | As for [1], it has a Contact Us form and a link to [2] | which talks about onboarding and an "On-demand, pay as you | go model". | | Could you point to the free market data pub/sub and/or | specific steps to recreate the demo? Thanks! | | [0] https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cme-group-to- | offer-... | | [1] https://www.cmegroup.com/market-data/connect- | data/cloud-mdp.... | | [2] https://dataservices.cmegroup.com/Data-Products | gurjeet wrote: | > ... data the avg person sees is 15 minutes delayed ..., that | may as well be a light year. | | Nit pick: you've got your units mixed up; minute is a unit of | time, and light-year is a unit of distance. | redanddead wrote: | fixed, thank you | Teodolfo wrote: | In some unit systems | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system) | they are both units of length. | sitkack wrote: | I blame George Lucas for this. | scarface74 wrote: | Don't be too impressed. Every company is interested in "opening | things up" when it's to their competitive advantage. | | You notice that "open" Android is increasingly dependent on | closed source "Google Play Services" and Google uses the closed | source parts to beat OEMs into submission? | dogleash wrote: | I ain't hating but "commoditizing your complement" is just | pushing others out and restricting access with extra steps. | | Admittedly, the bones they'll throw us in the process do look | like they'll be cool, tho. | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | As a consumer, you want everything to be a commodity (i.e. | and abundance of choice). This means you'll have more options | at every price point. | bee_rider wrote: | I would expect a commodity to be produced with pretty low | margins (since the competition is pretty fierce), but not | for free. If Google is giving away the information for | free, is that really a commodity? I mean either they are | giving it away for some strategic reason, they are taking | their cut in some more byzantine way, or they have decided | to act as a charity for at-home traders for some reason. | Dracophoenix wrote: | Information itself is a commodity. An encyclopedia | doesn't have value have because it costs money but the | vice versa. Wikipedia is free, yet it has done more for | the world in 20 years than the _Brittanica_ has in 250. | | I'm not suggesting Google gives away information as a | purely altruistic endeavor. However, Google's ulterior | motives, should they have any, are irrelevant to the | value of the information itself so long as it hasn't been | edited or tampered with. | redanddead wrote: | That never actually happens though, what ends up happening | is that people realize it's better to be a literal cartel | and MONOPOLY! | | And you get the worst of all deals, see Shrinkflation | | My point is we shouldn't trust businesses to be moral, and | I don't. I'm just angry at the NYSE | dogleash wrote: | >As a consumer, you want everything to be a commodity | | True. But I'm also guessing that in 5 years I'll be more | frustrated at the level of control they're exercising with | thing they're currently building next to it. More so than I | am with the market they're commoditising today. | konschubert wrote: | When things get commoditised, it's good for consumers. | | Competition is good. | colordrops wrote: | Hopefully this doesn't eventually go the way of Android where | they nerf the open source version and make it very difficult to | run without proprietary bits. | dragonelite wrote: | Pretty much this, just run android without GMS and you quickly | discover how limited it can be if you don't know what your | doing. | google234123 wrote: | This is a shitpost. | colordrops wrote: | What did I say that was inaccurate or untrue? | scarface74 wrote: | https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/07/googles-iron-grip- | on... | sorry_outta_gas wrote: | The emails leaked a few years ago on twitter say different | monetus wrote: | Have a link? Curious, but seemingly hard to find. | skywal_l wrote: | Can somebody ELI5 this to me? Wbo will that help? And how? 180nm | seems big, at least for computer CPUs. | unity1001 wrote: | Good initiative. | newaccount2021 wrote: | gchadwick wrote: | When the first open SkyWater 130nm PDK came out, with Google | paying for free shuttle runs I did wonder how long the money | would keep going. I assumed they'd fund a handful of shuttles in | the hope that kick starts wider usage. | | With this announcement and the other SkyWater 90nm they're | bringing out (https://opensource.googleblog.com/2022/07/SkyWater- | and-Googl...) it looks like they're keen to fund this for the | long haul which is fantastic news. | | I think there's great potential in open silicon but precious | little of it around right now. Open tooling is still in early | development stages in particular for implementation flows (i.e. | actually producing a silicon layout from your RTL design). | Development here is stifled by how closed this world is. Open | PDKs, that can be used for real chips, are a great boon and I | hope will really accelerate developments. | Kukumber wrote: | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-03 23:00 UTC)