[HN Gopher] A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctanc... ___________________________________________________________________ A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor Author : evo_9 Score : 483 points Date : 2022-08-11 15:00 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com) | boxmonster wrote: | dang wrote: | " _Please don 't sneer, including at the rest of the | community._" - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | | Even if you're right, it only makes things worse. | boxmonster wrote: | zackmorris wrote: | This is great, I'm happy for him! But I miss the creative aspect | in myself. I used to be so creative like him, with so many half- | finished inventions scattered around the house. | | Today there's nothing. I finally managed to carve out a day or | two per week away from my job to work on personal projects after | many years of failed attempts to get away at great personal | expense. But the last 3 days that I went to work on something, I | picked up the metaphorical brush and there was nothing there. No | creative impulse, just worries about chores/bills/obligation and | painful memories from 20 years of negative reinforcement after | failing at business or going through traumatic life events in | 2000, 2001, 2003, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2019 and during the pandemic. | Probably many more that all blur together. Now I just project my | frustrations onto the world with negativity and accomplish no | forward progress towards my life goals. | | Does anyone know a way to truly rekindle the creative spark after | it's completely died? I feel generally happy and capable, but in | borderline crisis that I can't self-start anymore or do work that | isn't demanded of me externally. I'm coming to terms with the | harsh reality that I'll likely never accomplish even one thing of | any importance in all of the remaining years of my life. There's | only work now and the daily grind. Pedal to the metal in first | gear. Like I started out as Wesley Crusher but today am Paulie | from Rocky with no prospects, only long slow decline. | gnramires wrote: | I'll try to give a more practical approach to complement other | answers. I believe creativity (in specific field and broadly) | is a skill like any other that you need to cultivate and | practice. It's also much about problem solving, identifying | needs, connecting ideas, and learning (i.e. having a good pool | of knowledge), than apparent. The more of each of those you | have, the better you become at innovating and creating in your | field. | | When you go into the world, you need to go asking yourself | "What could we improve here? What could we change here?". If | you're in a creative (artistic) field, it's a good idea to | survey the work of others and develop "taste" -- i.e. your own | perceptions of what's good material, and what things could be | improved. | | I'd suggest a few things: | | (1) Develop a space. Decide what you want to create, and give | yourself a dedicated space for it: 30 minutes a day, a few | times a week, you name it. I'm pretty sure with the space you | _will_ star making things, whatever you like. | | (2) Learn supporting skills and knowledge. Each field has | necessary skills to really be able to create -- software | skills, hardware skills, math, writing, drawing, art theory, | etc. | | (3) Survey what's out there. If you're a game developer, play | games and develop your own ideas, what is my dream game like? | What defines a good game? What's missing out there? What can I | actually make with my means? You'll be able to feed back into | your creations. If you're an engineer, the world is waiting to | be improved upon as well :) | dghughes wrote: | I was the same way only maybe not as productive as you. From a | young age until some point I was always thinking always | inventing. | | I recall thinking if it was possible to not think since I was | constantly thinking. I was well-known among my friends in pre- | Internet times as knowing a lot of obscure facts. I was always | reading anything from science journals to history mainly to get | ideas for inventions. | | One thing I have been toying with is a long fast. People say | for them it reset their brain and they could think more | clearly. And by long I mean days like a 7 day or more fast. At | my age it would probably kill me. | sbf501 wrote: | He has an amazing lab and access to a lot of expensive | resources. There should be maker labs like this for pre-college | kids all over the place, that are free. | jcalvinowens wrote: | > I can't self-start anymore or do work that isn't demanded of | me externally | | I've had similar feelings in the past. For me, the way out is | to flip it around: I'm not neglecting my personal project out | of a lack of willpower or motivation, I've lost interest in my | personal project and it's no longer rewarding enough to be | worth my time! The solution is to find something new to do, not | run yourself into the ground trying to see it through. | | It's not a job: you don't have to deliver something for your | time. Focus on what interests and excites _you_ , not what will | get internet points or make money. If you want to allocate part | of your free time towards making money, treat that like a | second job and not as free time. | | Also, a career culminating in a permanent fellowship with an | inter-dimensional time traveling think tank in your early | twenties is an unrealistic standard for achievement. | kthartic wrote: | Therapy, therapy, therapy :) | spcebar wrote: | Even though you're happy in every day life, it sounds like you | could benefit from some therapy to help you unpack those | painful memories. Moving past that might help your creativity | flow. | | When my creative juices feel depleted, I give myself permission | to do nothing. Take a long walk, play a game, watch a movie, | but don't make anything. I usually find that relieving the | pressure of feeling like I should be more productive actually | makes me more productive. | psd1 wrote: | Sympathies. If it's any consolation, Janacek wrote his string | quartets in his 80s. | | Go to Burning Man. I spent a month on site at a regional burn; | in the month since then, I've published two personal projects | and been much more productive at work. I never found that spark | on return from "normal" holidays. | Aromasin wrote: | It's not gone, just rusted. The oil to fix that is simply | spending time in a creative space. Keep making time for | yourself to build something. Even if you sit at a bench for 2 | hours and do nothing (I bet you won't) it's moving you more in | the direction of creativity again than any amount of time on a | computer or doing chores will bring you. | yuan43 wrote: | > No creative impulse, just worries about | chores/bills/obligation and painful memories... | | and later: | | > Does anyone know a way to truly rekindle the creative spark | after it's completely died? | | Take an unreasonably keen interest in your | chores/bills/obligations. Do you need to cook dinner? Research | the hell out of it to understand the underlying principles. | Experiment with your techniques, take notes, and perfect. Learn | the history of what you're doing. Do you need to do car | maintenance? Really understand what it is you're doing and why. | Do you need to manage finances? Become an expert in double- | entry accounting. Actually watch how-to videos on it and maybe | engage in an online discussion or two about it. | | It's easy to ignore the mundane things we're all faced to do. | It's also remarkable how interesting anything - no matter how | seemingly unremarkable - can be if viewed from the right | perspective and taken to sufficient extremes. | | If you were to take this approach, I suspect you might find | some interests you never knew you had. It's possible you can't | make headway on your old interests because you yourself have | changed. Those old interests don't in fact interest you in the | same way anymore, but you haven't recognized that yet. | eternalban wrote: | > Does anyone know a way to truly rekindle the creative spark | after it's completely died? | | I don't know about a "way" but falling in love definitely kicks | things back in gear. Go and get yourself a _muse_. | hnaday wrote: | For me, falling in love became a distraction, sadly. | | You have to ask yourself what's my goal? And what's my reward | function? Very different for everyone. | stewx wrote: | Find a way to challenge yourself. Maybe find some "off-the- | shelf" projects to build that don't require creativity, but | maybe do require some new skills or new technology you haven't | used before. | Aperocky wrote: | > creative spark | | The harder you want it, the more elusive it is. | | I've done a bunch of projects that I'm proud of (on a very | minor scale, mostly 0 use outside of satisfying my own | curiosity), but if you ask me now on the spot I would have no | idea what is the next interesting personal project that I'll | find really creative and fun. | | When it comes it comes. | MattPalmer1086 wrote: | The creative impulse can be shy, when it's not all consuming. | We forget that we need to play, without the expectation of a | result. | | The highest creative states are sometimes called "formless | functioning". This is when you are fully immersed in creating, | and the ego just dissolves. It's hard to be creative when | you're standing over your own shoulder criticising your lack of | creativity. | | So I would be gentle with yourself. Play, do things you enjoy | just because you enjoy them. The creative impulse will stir. | hutzlibu wrote: | Your honesty was refreshing compared to others who jumped | straight to hate, because there was no story about them as 17 | year old inventors (so clearly he does not deserve it either). | | But a magic bullet to rekindle the creative spark? | | There is none. | | Give it a rest and it will come back, or not. | | Try something new, preferably somewhere else. | bckr wrote: | > Give it a rest and it will come back, or not. | | I don't think this is right. | | I think instead GP can pick up the brush over and over again | and make things happen with or without the creative spark. | The point is to get inspired by one's own creation, not to | create ex nihilo. | hutzlibu wrote: | When you pick up the brush with disgust, after a while you | will feel only disgust with the whole art and never create | anything inspired and beautiful again. | karamanolev wrote: | > No creative impulse, just worries about | chores/bills/obligation | | I think that's critical in many people's lives and I've felt it | starting to creep in my, but I think I'm keeping it at bay. | Based on personal experience, when you settle down and/or start | family, chores/bills/obligations start creeping up on you | massively. It's very easy to get sucked into a mindset that if | you start falling behind on those, your life will start falling | apart. In reality, a lot of those can be postponed with only | minor downsides. Yes, you can live in a slightly dirtier/less | organized house. Yes, the lawn can be slightly less maintained. | Yes, you can probably postpone that car service another week. | Just sit down, forget about the world [not] falling apart and | enjoy your hobbies. Write some side-project code, start a | hardware tinkering project that you're unlikely to finish. | Disassemble a failing kitchen appliance to see if you can fix | it. Those things bring way more to your life than the apparent | utility! | phonescreen_man wrote: | Maybe try magic mushrooms? | justinlloyd wrote: | I don't know the answer to your problem. I've gone through | periods of "lack of creativity" in my own life, usually when | there's too many "life experiences" happening around me and my | day job is spilling over in the number of hours it needs. | | I will say that WFH has helped immensely, at 6PM-ish I turn off | the VM that is my day job computer and flip over to whatever it | is I want to be working on, or go in to my workshop. I have | designated areas in my home office for - this is where I write, | this is where I do electronics, this is where I write code, | this is where do my day job, this is where I do woodworking. | That compartmentalization prevents other activities from | spilling over. Limited social media hours, just like limited TV | hours, is also another boon. | | I write a lot of what I call "lab notes" about my thought | processes as I work through ideas, example here | https://github.com/justinlloyd/retro-chores for a current | project, take lots of pictures of things as I research, and see | where it leads me. | | I also abandon a lot of things too, when I am no longer feeling | the spark. I'd rather have a hundred abandoned creative | projects than a few that I feel guilty about not working on, or | not feeling the urge to work on. | codazoda wrote: | I recently created a Scanner Daybook from the ideas presented | by the late Barbara Sher in one of her books. It's freed me to | explore ideas on paper with no obligation to create the works I | describe. The funny thing is that it strokes my mind and I | actually get a lot of the projects done. I tend to work in an | MVP fashion and create very simple things, however. | adaml_623 wrote: | Try going internet free for two weeks? | whiddershins wrote: | I've been there, more than once. I seriously doubt the creative | impulse can be eradicated, it is just hiding. | | The way I've gotten past this is to commit to messing around, | or trying to make some small thing, at a specific time on a | schedule. | | (Every morning, whatever you have) | | Make no rules about what is "valid" to work on, and give | yourself permission to quit after a certain amount of time if | you still aren't feeling it that day. | | The creativity will return as a result of _doing_. And it may | take a form that surprises you, and wasn't what you set out to | focus on, because currently you don't know yourself well enough | to know what you are even interested in. | | One day, during one of those periods, I sat down at my | regularly scheduled time and I produced computer music for | about 60 minutes, listened back to what I made and was | absolutely disgusted by how mediocre it was. | | I stood up to walk out of my studio and on a lark picked up my | trusty 6 string bass. I then wrote this entire song in one | pass: | | Spotify | | https://open.spotify.com/track/2erc0IdvaDh6xnprg8gthS?si=xX0... | | Apple Music | | https://music.apple.com/us/album/sometimes-you-need-sun-feat... | | It just came out fully formed. | | Relax, play, mess around, do little fun or interesting things. | Let your mind wander. But sit down at your scheduled time. | | Inspiration will return. | didgetmaster wrote: | Part of the resistance to the creative process is the current | demand from the market that version 1.0 of something has to be | 'near perfect'. | | In the old days (80s and 90s), a software startup could release | their first version that did something truly unique even if it | was still really rough around the edges. People would buy the | first version with the expectation that a good portion of the | revenue would be used for R&D which would make version 2.0 way | better. You could boot-strap some really great projects that | way. | | It seems that today, a new product never stands a chance unless | it has great funding up front with all the kinks worked out and | tons of bells and whistles built-in before ever being | introduced to the public. | | I created a new kind of data management system that manages | unstructured data (i.e. files) completely different than | conventional file systems. It also does some amazing work with | structured data using Key-Value stores to make really fast | relational tables. | | When I demonstrate how it can do something like file lookups | thousands of times faster than file systems or how it can do a | query against a big table 10x faster than Postgres; you would | think that would capture people's attention and make them want | to investigate it further. | | Instead, most just point out what your little startup project | is still missing when compared to 40-year old projects that are | on version 15. They say, "Get back to us once you have | A,B,C,D,... features working, tested, and perfected". When you | lack the resources to do that, it can be soul crushing. | Animats wrote: | Somebody sign him up for YC. $500K is enough to build some good | prototype motors and find out if this is commercially viable. | eterevsky wrote: | So, how is it in terms of efficiency? The article mentions that | it's 31% more efficient than existing reluctance motors, but | doesn't give a comparison to the traditional electric motors. | phkahler wrote: | That's a very good question. I have an EV motor control and | calibration background so lots to say here. First off, peak | efficiency tends to occur at mid to high speed and mid to high | torque, in other words high power. Most EVs spend very little | time operating anywhere near their peak power. It may take as | little as 4kW to drive down the highway at constant speed, but | a motor may be capable of 100kW or much more. | | Efficiency at 500 to 1000 RPM is important, and reluctance | machines tend to be very poor at those speeds and low torques. | So maybe he increased efficiency from 30 percent to 61 percent, | which would be really good. Or maybe he increased efficiency | from 50 percent to 65.5 percent (65.5/50 = 1.31 but I hate | looking at percent change of a percentage). What he did not do | is increase the max efficiency significantly at an already | efficient operating point where most motors are already over 90 | percent, and that's OK because like I said we don't operate up | there very often. | | BTW, IMHO the best way to characterize electric machines like | this is not to look at their efficiency, but to look at their | losses. There's a really nice way to plot losses but it's a bit | hard to explain in a comment. He also doesn't seem to have a | dyno which makes taking data and testing a lot easier. | | Anyway, he did a great job and will undoubtedly continue doing | so! | 1-more wrote: | > Efficiency at 500 to 1000 RPM is important | | Why is this? Thinking out loud: can't you gear your motor so | that it's most efficient at cruising speed for the vehicle? | But the problem is that the car still needs to be able to | accelerate from zero and some gearings will make that | impossible, so having an efficient band at 500--1000 RPM | gives you the best chance of being able to accelerate from | 0-500 RPM? | choonway wrote: | >He also doesn't seem to have a dyno which makes taking data | and testing a lot easier. | | how do you test without a dyno? and isn't it easy to set up a | electrical generator tied to a high wattage variable resistor | to do it? | sitkack wrote: | If the design is sufficiently low cost, and since it it wont | have drag when free wheeling, multiple motors could be ganged | to provide different peak/torque efficiencies. High torque to | get off the line and a cruising motor to travel at speed. | Given the power to weight densities of modern motors, having | multiple compact motors will provide zero weight burden in a | car. | VLM wrote: | Motors are no monolith, and the various scaling factors WRT | bearing quality and air gap (among other construction tolerance | issues) mean the smaller the motor is, generally the less | efficient it is. What is motor efficiency is very much a "how | long is a piece of string?" question. | | All engineering is about tradeoffs and if the kid is replacing | air gap with "something", that efficiency has to be balanced | against better bearings vs better mfgr tolerances etc. Its | still a valid tool in the collection of tradeoffs; but its | unlikely to match the boosterism tone of the article as being | "the solution to all our problems". | | The problem with boosterism is not that its positive or | criticism is good or complaining that contest he was in, is | mostly a contest of parental income and willingness to spend, | but the problem with boosterism is it can completely overshadow | any actual science or engineering. The kid probably DID do | something cool and interesting, but it's buried under the | boosterism and exhilarating claims of world changing etc. | | Its a valid criticism because this kind of popular coverage | gives the false impression that actual science journal articles | or EE component datasheets should consist of 99% boosterism | with perhaps 1% content. From a journalistic perspective its | worthy of criticism in the sense of this is NOT science and | engineering journalism, its just a puff piece full of glory and | sparkles. From an educational perspective its worthy of | criticism in that the tone of the article implies kids should | not go into STEM fields unless their parents are rich and easy | spenders, which ironically would be a better match for a non- | financially rewarding liberal arts degree; I assure you that a | kid can grow up to be an excellent EE even if his parents can't | afford a 3d-printer. | londons_explore wrote: | A tesla Model 3 motor already is partially a reluctance motor. | This youtube video describes it rather well, and I'd recommend | giving it a watch [1]. Notice the air gaps - thats the reluctance | part of the rotor. | | [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esUb7Zy5Oio | b3nji wrote: | > A tesla Model 3 motor already is partially a reluctance | motor. This youtube video describes it rather well, and I'd | recommend giving it a watch [1]. Notice the air gaps - thats | the reluctance part of the rotor. | | > [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esUb7Zy5Oio | | I dont think he's using air gaps? | | "Instead of using air gaps, Sansone thought he could | incorporate another magnetic field into a motor." | viggity wrote: | if you watch the video, tesla puts the magnets in the air | gaps. (around 6m 40s) | tromp wrote: | Air gaps are the traditional way to make a reluctance motor. | Sansone is exploring a different way to make a reluctance | motor, improving performance at the cost of added complexity. | theincredulousk wrote: | does anyone know how it works that towards the end of the | video, it shows the resulting torque curve of the motor is | actually negative for a decent span. Does this mean the motor | actually resists rotation for that arc during every rotation? | | Wouldn't that be a significant hit to efficiency, or do the | benefits simply outweigh it for a net gain? | elihu wrote: | I think the idea is that the inverter's job is to always be | continually changing the current to the motor's stator | windings such that you'd always have close to the optimal | angle between the rotor and the magnetic fields created by | the stator. Kind of like how a gas engine might backfire if | you fired a spark plug at the wrong time so a well designed | engine would avoid doing that. | DFHippie wrote: | That makes it sound like this could be used to improve | Tesla's motors. | perf1 wrote: | Why are there no improvements in traditional petrol engines? They | basically convert 60% into heat. Like use the heat to run a steam | engine? | VLM wrote: | The term to google for is cogeneration. Sometimes all people | need is the correct search term. | | The problem with cogeneration is its usually incredibly heavy | and there aren't many uses for very low temperature process | heat in most real-world applications. | | Another problem with cogeneration is you might get a small | percentage boost by connecting a backup generator to the HVAC | system but the capex can be VERY high if done safely and | reliably, and system complexity seems to scale at an | exponential rate. It seems a no-brainer to dump the radiator | heat from a backup generator into an office building thereby | burn less natgas to heat the building; however you factor in | that you have to frost-proof it all and its going to be | hundreds of gallons of anti-freeze in those pipes which is | expensive and all pipes leak eventually with has ecological | issues, and you can't have exhaust leaks into the building and | over half the time you need cooling not heating anyway and the | HVAC cannot be made smaller because you still need to heat even | when the gen is off and the HVAC system will be less reliable | because it'll be more complicated and the backup gen will be | less reliable because its more complicated, perhaps making the | backup gen less reliable than wall power. So shrug shoulders | and dump the gen heat using an air cooled radiator, even in the | winter. | phkahler wrote: | There is a fundamental limit to ICE efficiency dictated by the | laws of thermodynamics. You can push that theoretical limit up, | but it is dependent on having a higher compression ratio. | Diesel engines use higher compression ratios for ignition, but | they are dirty (in comparison). Higher compression ratios tend | to result in more NOx emissions too, so for the regular car | makers there is a direct trade between | efficiency/emissions/reliability. But even if you aim for | highest efficiency at all cost, you'll never get close to 100 | percent, as the theoretical max never goes there (or does it at | infinite compression ratio?). | iiv wrote: | There have been huge improvements since the first petrol | engine, and huge improvements in the last 20 years as well. | Petrol engines are some of the most studied and meticulously | engineered things ever created. | skykooler wrote: | One big limitation is the Carnot efficiency - for any heat | engine (which internal combustion engines are) there's a | maximum upper bound on the efficiency, which for gasoline and | diesel is around 37%. Beyond that point you can't extract any | more energy out of the waste heat without removing energy from | somewhere else in the system. | formerly_proven wrote: | Petrol engines can physically only achieve around 55-60 % | efficiency, so getting up to ~35-40 % vehicle efficiency is | actually really good. Large scale Diesel engines get really, | really close (within a few points) of the hypothetical | frictionless-no-heat-radiation-no-flow-losses efficiency | possible with their parameters. | shakezula wrote: | What do you mean? The amount of improvements in standard ICE | engines are mind-blowing. The fuel efficiency and power they | manage these days is insane. You're quoting that 60% figure and | neglecting that most of the losses from that are thermodynamic | and mechanical losses at transfer points that can't really be | overcome. At some point you have to lose some heat along the | way. | monkpit wrote: | We've been improving them for like 150 years, and they're still | getting better. For example, Mazda's Skyactiv to increase | compression ratios. | yreg wrote: | There has been a myriad of improvements in traditional petrol | engines? | wizofaus wrote: | Yet our cars still can't fly, and still emit greenhouse | gases... | doug_life wrote: | Turbochargers do exactly that. They take waste gas/heat to turn | a pump and provide more oxygen for combustion. Also look into | the F1 ERS systems that recover waste energy. | kwertyoowiyop wrote: | Drive a car from the 1980s for a little while, then come back | and we can discuss how much better engines are today. | | Lots! | rob_c wrote: | Good luck if he gets a patent and helps improve the world. | | This feels like another story on a revolutionary battery which is | 20% better but has 3x parts and is 10x the final cost. I hope | it's just bad reporting. | russellbeattie wrote: | This next generation is finally fulfilling the promise of the | Internet in my opinion. Every book, article, research paper and | millions of high quality instructional videos, lectures and | courses are there for the taking. And the Zoomers really are | using all that information. It's like water to fish - it's all | around them. | | I've personally seen my son and his friends get into and then | become proficient in a bunch of different topics, like motorcycle | maintenance, programming games, film and video editing, drone | racing/building, music and a ton of other real-world useful | skills, all without a mentor being involved. I've personally | learned more about a bunch of different topics I never had a | handle on before, like physics and math, where my education was | stuck at an 11th grade level until the past few years. | | Compared to my teen years, the difference is breathtaking. I | think the result will be a better society and a bunch of people | doing what they really love for a living. | ssizn wrote: | It's always the same, "<minor> creates revolutionary thing". And | then nothing comes out of it. | ekianjo wrote: | Also, would be good to see any proper research done on the | correlation between kids like that winning prizes and how they | fare in the future in terms of driving first-rate innovation | wherever they go. | | I have a hunch there's hardly any. | gedy wrote: | That's fine, as long as it's not some phoney PR thing like | "...well and their parents happen to world experts of the same | thing", or own a business around this, etc. | katkatkatkatket wrote: | Usually because <minor> has made a prototype of an already | well-established phenomenon, and the really difficult part is | making a production-ready design. | | A bit like the "10-year-old makes a heart pump for just $10" | stories. It's really easy to hook up a motor to some pipes, | it's absurdly hard to make that pass medical regulations. | keepquestioning wrote: | Better than Clock Boy | vxNsr wrote: | A lot of this stuff dies on the industrial engineer's desk | where it can't be made viable at scale. | MattGrommes wrote: | This is also true for a lot of research done by adults at a | large cost. Every "New Battery Technology Will Run Your Phone | For 1 Million Years!" story ends like this once they go to | the real world with it. | barroomhero wrote: | Waiting for the "yeah, but..." comments now. | olivermarks wrote: | 'Could'... | throw_m239339 wrote: | Because most of these stories are sensationalized omitting a | lot of facts around who's that kid, who are his parents and how | much help did the provide him. It's also often a PR stunt to | promote an underlying company or organization. This kid didn't | developed anything in his parent's garage, he had access to | sophisticated industrial equipment and you bet someone helped. | | Of course, there are outliers, but most often it's borderline | fake news. | asciimov wrote: | That's because the "rest of the story" isn't as good. With a | little digging you often find <minors>'s parent(s) are a | researcher that studies that exact <thing> <minor> was | building, or <minor> somehow got a job working at a lab that | works on <thing>, or <minors>'s <thing> isn't as novel as | article leads you to believe often with <thing> being known and | unused due to some obvious flaw. | wizofaus wrote: | Impressive...we might actually get our next Tesla or Edison...as | I've noted here before, why there's not more such prodigies these | days with genuine determination and obvious ability given today's | population, existing knowledge base and access to education and | resources still somewhat eludes me. | mywacaday wrote: | When I first began using social media I was excited at the | potential ability in the future to look back over my life. In | reality I have almost completely abandoned social media and I am | very happy with the Google photos remember this day feature which | for me goes back at least 15 years. The only worry is how long | Google maintain Photos | justusthane wrote: | What? Wrong post, maybe? | BirAdam wrote: | I normally try to avoid posting a comment that echoes others, but | I will make an exception this time. | | I am old enough to remember issue after issue in the 90s of | Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, Scientific American, and | other magazines wherein there'd be a breakthrough that promised | to revolutionize the world. Then, you'd read news off Yahoo or | Fark that would describe a young wiz kid's new invention. Nothing | happened. Ever. | | Due to this inevitable hype train that lacks any kind of stopping | ability, paranoid types would start thinking that the oil | industry must be involved in stopping them. Not a bad assumption | given things that megacorps have done in the past, but it is | generally bad policy to invent large nefarious schemes with zero | evidence. | | As a younger guy, I was always intrigued and would then start | drawing and writing about the world to come! It was so enjoyable | and the crushing disappointment would come over the months as | nothing more was heard or seen. I awoke to the reality that | people run risk calculations on business, on machinery, on | changes, and if the financials aren't viable, things don't | happen. Additionally, young inventors are often seduced by patent | purchase offers. Then if megacorp X has a bad culture that can't | produce a truly new product... it dies. Beyond all of those | challenges, you have regulators to convince as well. Of course, | here in the good ol' USA, regulators don't seem to care toooooo | much about safety. Paper thin cars with zero crumple zones? okay. | SUVs without doors, roofs, accurate steering? okay. Trucks and | SUVs with very high rollover potential? sure. Non-lockable | differentials? absolutely. Massive lithium batteries that catch | fire somewhat easily? Why not. | | Note, I am actually fairly libertarian and don't support | regulation in general, but I hear very frequently that automobile | regulation is big reason for innovation being stifled, and in | this case I do not see how that could be even remotely possible. | jwitchel wrote: | Robert Sansone, great job! | | So many young prospective engineers read HN every day. Let's find | comments that are encouraging or thought provoking or point | readers in helpful directions Like @londons_explore did. | | Bringing the beatdown is bad for everyone. Especially bad for | young engineers. This kid is impressive, straight up impressive. | Let's encourage him and others like him. HN shouldn't someone's | supervillain origin story. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqMCYdqaFCQ&t=41s | justsocrateasin wrote: | I had a hunch this would link me to The Incredibles. Great | reference and I totally agree with the sentiment. | throw_m239339 wrote: | > Bringing the beatdown is bad for everyone. | | It's healthy to question media narrative as the media tend to | sensationalize and embellish stories for clicks or views. It's | disingenuous to try to make people feel guilty about it arguing | if we question that story that child will turn bad or | something, in an post-truth era. Nobody is attacking that kid, | just how the media cover these stories with a template. | bryanlarsen wrote: | I don't think this is totally on the media. The story is | sufficiently weasel worded -- the motor "could" "pave the | way". Anybody with any experience reads "could" as "probably | not" and "pave the way" as "a tiny little step in a long | process". | | Most 6 year olds have figured out that "maybe" means | "probably not". Many adults have forgotten that lesson. | alex_young wrote: | Most of the major inventions of the last 2 centuries were | the product of many incremental steps. The automobile, the | airplane, the computer, the internet, etc. | | I think it's worth celebrating even minor contributions | toward a potentially world changing future personally. | picture wrote: | Hey, as someone who's participated in the same competition, | you got it right on the money. It's a well known joke | amongst science fair students that "could pave the way to | this and that" really means its kinda useless. Some of our | school's projects from two years ago worked on quantum | computing but didn't achieve the goals they'd hope for so | our instructor just told them to sprinkle some paved the | ways in their paper | cheschire wrote: | Will the kid understand that's everyone's intent, I wonder? | Silverback_VII wrote: | He surely will have to understand that to be exceptional | creates a lot of headwind (certainly in his own field). | | "The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who | cannot fly." | tiahura wrote: | Being a curmudgeon isn't a virtue. | RHSeeger wrote: | Given the sheer number of headlines like "<This invention> | will change the face of <this well known thing>" that | really boil down to "<This idea, which isn't even new> is | interesting to think about, but won't really have any | impact on <this well known thing>"... it really doesn't | make one ill-tempered to bring up for discussion whether | the current article is one of those. | | It might not be one of those, and it's not fair to assume | it _is_ one of those... but discussing whether it is or not | isn't rude/mean, and probably _should_ be standard | practice. | jwitchel wrote: | Fair enough, but context matters and there are two that | matter here: (1) The subject was the tech and the engineer | not biased media narratives, and (2) HN is a forum that so | many people look up to. So if you want to context switch to a | discussion about the media (a worthy subject BTW) post a new | thread; let's not do it on a thread that is spotlighting | interesting tech from a promising engineer. | slingnow wrote: | I would much rather live in a world where people question | biased media narratives and we risk hurting someone's | feelings than the other way around. If this kid can't | handle a little bit of criticism, he won't be long for the | engineering discipline. | jwitchel wrote: | It's not a binary choice. We can and should have both. We | can also provide constructive feedback and at times | criticism both without risking hurting their feelings. | Again, the point is time and place. | dieselgate wrote: | Don't know about this one, when it comes to someone who | is younger than 18 for this context I'd error on the side | of "if you don't have anything nice to say don't say | anything". If it's Sharktank or something that's a bit | different | psd1 wrote: | That's a false dichotomy | | > If this kid can't handle a little bit of criticism | | I do expect adults - over 25 - to take the rough with the | smooth. But children are not adults. | | I think you're assuming your own competence at pedagogy. | I would want to shield children from you until they've | developed the resilience you demand from them. | | Also, the emotional tone - sheesh | jwitchel wrote: | +1 And to pile on a bit here... part of learning to be a | good engineer is learning how to give good constructive | feedback. If you are creating real risk of truly hurting | someone with your feedback (in a PR or a code review for | example) then it's you who are at fault for tone deafness | not them for being thin skinned. | | Giving and getting feedback is hard. It's a skill and it | doesn't come easily to most. Sometimes hurting someone's | feelings is inevitable, but starting from a place of | "toughen up buttercup" is really self-serving and | counterproductive. | | There is always someone better than you, and always | someone worse. Always someone who knows something you | don't, and always someone who can learn from you. | giantg2 wrote: | Waterluvian wrote: | People are far more likely to become your neighbours or | coworkers than they are to replace you. Gotta resist the | instinct to be competitive and gatekeep. | | This is wonderful work and it makes me feel bubbly about the | future of engineering when young adults are _this engaged_. | mortenjorck wrote: | I think this is the right angle to take. | | Unlike a lot of breathless "engineering breakthrough" stories, | this piece, as well as young Mr. Sansone himself, readily | acknowledge that this is a work in progress and may not pan | out. Even if it doesn't, what an incredible achievement for a | high-schooler - and just imagine the great contributions to the | field this kid is poised to make in the coming decades. | moffkalast wrote: | > and just imagine the great contributions to the field this | kid is poised to make in the coming decades | | Well let's curb the expectations for now, it can be quite | damaging for a kid be held forever to an potentially | unrealistic standard just because they did something great | once. I mean sure for the occasional genius it turns out fine | because they live up to it, but for the rest it's a self hate | and imposter syndrome on steroids. | hosh wrote: | I think this person has a strong intrinsic motivation to | contribute innovations. He has already worked on other | projects before this one. We don't have to have any | expectations or setting up any extrinsic motivations or | even to be cheerleaders, and instead, we can honor and | respect him for who he is, and his chosen purpose. And for | those with the capability and availability, act as resource | if he needs it. (In the article, he says he was working | without a mentor and had to figure a lot of stuff out | himself). | karaterobot wrote: | All the objections to this that I have are from the breathless | tone of this article, and the many others in the past that have | made big claims for the sake of precious, precious clicks. | Whether or not this particular design revolutionizes the field is | beside the point. As we know, most things do not. But if he's | made something novel that expands our understanding, and he's | done it in a garage without institutional backing, or investors, | or even a mentor, then it's an impressive achievement. | hbarka wrote: | Tesla's electric motor evolution is an interesting journey that | has taken them at this point to the permanent magnet synchronous | reluctance motor (PMSRM). Their history is very interesting. The | early Model S was RWD using an induction motor. The AWD Model S | then got a smaller induction motor on the front, keeping the | larger sibling in the rear. They then ditched the larger rear | motor and just used the same smaller motors front and rear. All | the while they were also evolving the software to optimize for | torque split, acceleration, and range. They released a feature | that they called torque sleep in which the rear motor would pulse | off leaving just the front motor driving the car during low | torque conditions. The AWD was effectively FWD during these | moments, squeezing additional range. | | When the Model 3 was released, it had a completely new motor, the | permanent magnet synchronous reluctance motor. Various names and | acronyms called it PMSRM, IPM-SynRM, PMa-SynRM, but the main | difference was that now Tesla was moving away from the | asynchronous induction motor (and no permanent magnet), to the | PMSRM. Having permanent magnets now allowed it to have true "one- | pedal" driving, where the car can bring itself to a complete stop | without using the physical brakes. With the magnetless induction | motors, the driver has to induce a brake hold during a stop, then | release, which was still better than keeping the foot on the | brake, but one-pedal driving was the luxury feature to have if | just for the lazy look-ma-no-pedals stop. | | Wait there's more. | | Tesla in its genius still had inventories of the induction motor, | so at first they created an AWD configuration that had the extra- | large watermelon-sized induction motor in the rear and | cantaloupe-sized PMSRM on front. Software was used to optimize | for power or range. Stomp on the power pedal and electricity went | to the induction motor. Cruise for range and this load was tasked | to the PMSRM. There was enough combined torque and power to go | around that Tesla could make these modulations hundreds of times | a second. | | They also sold these combinations as the Performance or Plus | version. There was also the LR for Long Range, the LR Plus, the | Standard Range, Standard Range Plus). You can guess as to which | combination of AWD, RWD, induction, or induction + PMSRM each car | model had based on the badging. They did this for a few quarters | then went all in on purely PMSRM front and rear. Some Tesla old- | school purists still scour the used car listings to find the pure | induction models. | | If you haven't experienced it you have to try how smooth the | Tesla motors are when it comes to one-pedal driving. It's really | good compared to other makers. One-pedal driving isn't unique to | Tesla but there's something different in their recipe. It's | available in the latest Model S, 3, X, Y with PMSRM. Tesla | engineers are a brilliant lot and maybe Robert Sansone can join | them and continue the arc of motor evolution and who knows maybe | go back to motors without a permanent magnet someday. | kayfhf wrote: | jedberg wrote: | As a parent, my first question is what did his parents do to | foster this and enable it, and can I do it too? I know my kids | may not be interested in engineering, but I want to at least give | them the chance. And I suspect whatever his parents did is | applicable to other interests too. | skapadia wrote: | If I had to guess, they probably let him try whatever he wants, | without that knee-jerk impulse of saying "that's crazy, no | way!" or "stop what you're doing and clean your room" or | "you're always in the garage. go out and play, or get a part | time job". Now it's possible he's able to do this because his | parents can afford to let him spend time on this, but still. | It's really easy as a parent to just say "no", but much harder | to put your own prejudices and assumptions aside and say "yes". | My daughter is 10yo and spends hours in her room drawing, | painting, and making miniatures of everything out of cardboard, | paper, and whatever scraps are around. She hoards all that | stuff. So many times I say, no let's throw that away or you're | spending too much time on art. Her best creations are when we | leave her completely alone. | | I recognize my own hypocrisy, because I'm a far better | developer when there are few meetings - when I'm left alone. | wyre wrote: | I'm not a parent, but I had a less-than-supportive teenagehood. | I think an unconditional support of your child's interests and | growth will go a long way. Be a yes man/say no as little as you | can. I imagine this kids parents provided a lot of financial | support from his parents too. | | "Nothing has a stronger influence psychologically on their | children than the unlived life of the parent." -- Carl Jung | | Good luck! I wish you the best! | rdl wrote: | Wow. This is inspiring -- will be interesting to see what else he | does in the future. Selfishly I hope he stays focused on | innovative hardware stuff rather than getting dragged into | advertising optimization or some other big software project. | robertlagrant wrote: | This is how we do it. Not 30-somethings in STEM for the cash and | clout, or Twitter warriors frantically retweeting, or the green | PR industry, or authoritarian rules. | | More people like this lad, motivated, smart, and hard-working, | and we'll become sustainable. Just need to get out of their way. | mattkrause wrote: | Part of the problem is that there's very little cash in the S | or M parts of STEM. | dymk wrote: | We do "it" (what's "it"?) with... 17 year olds' spare time, for | free? Maybe they get a patent if it all pans out? | ordu wrote: | > If his motor continues to perform with high speed and | efficiency, he says he'll move forward with the patenting | process. | | Is it a wise move? Shouldn't he just file a patent application | instantly? (It is not a kind of a sarcasm or something. I really | do not know, and I'd like to hear from people experienced with | patent applications.) | [deleted] | yardie wrote: | Its kind of expensive. About $30-50k for the entire process. | For a big company with deep pockets and IP lawyers already on | retainer that price is just the cost of doing business and an | investment of beating the competition. If your an individual | $30k for a not sure bet is a hell of a lot of money. | | A good friend patented a makeup applicator and she's not sure | if she'll ever get that money back. | potamic wrote: | Why does it cost so much to file a patent? Isn't one able to | draft and submit an application by themselves? | yardie wrote: | You can do a lot of things on your own and you may even be | successful at it but there are so many roadblocks | intentionally put in your way. If you don't have the | expertise to file an application paying someone else to | counsel may be prudent. If you do have the expertise you'll | probably make more being hired to file than the actual | patent filer. | | Anyway, she thought of an idea. Sketched and prototyped it. | Hired a lawyer to file it and that was step 1. She wasn't | able to manufacture, license, or sell her patent. | | She went back to being a makeup artist and was mildly | successful streaming. | | Other friends with patents work for large corps (Siemens, | Microsoft, Motorola) who handle it all automatically. They | might have got a plaque and a annual bonus for their | effort. None are wildly richer for it. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | I got a dollar, for mine... | cma wrote: | Even publishing it gets him a 1 year inventor's grace period | where his publication can act as prior art to stop others from | patenting, but doesn't stop him from patenting, under the | newish first to file rules. But I dont know about | internationally. | mminer237 wrote: | The USPTO's grace period is very generous internationally. | About 16 countries have comparable rules.[1] In most of | Europe, any public disclosure beforehand completely prohibits | you from getting a patent. So if you want protection outside | the Americas and Eastern Asia, you should still not disclose | anything before you get a patent. | | [1]: https://www.mewburn.com/law-practice-library/grace- | periods-f... | BaseballPhysics wrote: | Probably. Given some years back the US moved to a first-to-file | system, getting an initial patent application filed to | establish that date is probably not a bad idea and isn't too | terribly expensive. | djbusby wrote: | Can be done for just the filing fee. But you'd likely want to | have council help, about $6k last I looked. | BaseballPhysics wrote: | You don't need a completed application to get a provisional | going. A suitable written description is enough, and is | something an individual can probably do on their own. The | USPTO even has a whole section providing resources and | assistance for folks to do this: | | https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/using-legal- | services/pr... | | That said, promoting that to a full non-provisional | application is not something most people should do without | a patent attorney as it takes real skill in the art (ha!) | to get the claim set right. | picture wrote: | What exactly is novel about this? I've participated in ISEF | before and the amount of marketing/hyping and the lack of | knowledgeable judges is frustrating. ISEF also clearly have a | thorough fetish with patents. If you check the box on your form | suggesting you may look into patenting in the future, your | project performs a lot better. | gnramires wrote: | The only thing that saddens me here is the patent aspect. I | really wish we had a more open and effective IP mechanism. | jbay808 wrote: | > Instead of using air gaps, Sansone thought he could | incorporate another magnetic field into a motor. This would | increase this saliency ratio and, in turn, produce more torque. | | This appears to be the novel part. It's an SRM but it appears | to replace, or augment, the airgaps using some additional | technique to increase the saliency ratio. | | The text sort of implies that it's using a rotor winding, but | I'm not sure; that would arguably make it no longer an SRM. | Maybe he's added conductors into the airgaps to exclude | magnetic fields via eddy currents. | | Or maybe something else! | | Whatever it was, it's very impressive to be making and testing | motor prototypes on one's own, at his age or any age. There's a | ton of work that goes into every little detail, like coil | winding, or bearing alignment. Definitely great work! | callumprentice wrote: | Inspiring story all round but this paragraph stood out for me: | | "I didn't have a mentor to help me, really, so each time a motor | failed, I had to do tons of research and try and troubleshoot | what went wrong," he says. "But eventually on the 15th motor, I | was able to get a working prototype." | | I imagine most 17 year old would not have kept going 15+ times | until they arrived at something which worked. | bastardoperator wrote: | In my experience young minds are far more likely to keep at it | where most adults take issue with repetitive processes. | strikelaserclaw wrote: | he will have learned at some point that most valuable skill one | can learn is self reliance in the face of adversity. | diego_sandoval wrote: | Makes me realize that it wasn't lack of opportunities or lack | of mentorship that stopped me from achieving what I wanted when | I was a teenager, it's just that I didn't want it bad enough. | melony wrote: | He is from an upper middle class family at the minimum. | Hardware projects at his scale is not exactly a low cost | expenditure, even with AliExpress and cheap Asian parts of | questionable quality. I doubt he even needs the winnings to pay | tuition. | sebastianconcpt wrote: | In what all that resentment towards him is helping you or | anyone? | melony wrote: | No, but pointing out something that most people seem to | gloss over. It is like reading "startup X raised Y dollar | with a Z year old founder" articles and oohing and aahing | while misunderstanding the actual circumstances that got | them there. It is never about solely the product and idea, | HN hates to acknowledge this but you don't raise money | without strong connections and network, and it is the same | story for science fairs (especially at the pre- | undergraduate level). Follow your children to the next | state-level science fair and most of the top award winners | will have similar backgrounds. Almost always a relative or | "family friend" in academia/research who's guiding them, | either that or a blank cheque for the children/extremely | well funded school clubs. | llaolleh wrote: | You're correct. Those factors are often overlooked. Kids | don't even know that if they ask enough times, there are | kind people who are willing to help them. | | All this leads me to conclude that we need to do better | so these resources to innovate and learn are accessible | to all. | ekianjo wrote: | > resentment towards him is helping you or anyone? | | Where do you see resentment? It's like saying "anyone could | have been Bill Gates" except that Bill Gates had access to | lab computers much earlier than any other kid of his | generation (and his family was well off, too). A touch with | reality is always helpful in an ocean of optimism. | sebastianconcpt wrote: | In your judgment about what he and his family needs are, | your pre-supposed hypothesis about their condition and | about the usage of his tuition and the resources of his | prize which are not your prerogative. That comment which | is subtly derogatory and distractive to the merit in | question is your search or highlight of what exactly? | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | The parent comment is saying that kids' achievements are | limited to their resources. This seems valid to me. | Certainly my own experience as a parent (and a child) bears | it out. | johnohara wrote: | My experience teaching high school kids was just the opposite. | Quite a few will stay with a problem long after most so-called | "prudent" adults have moved on. | | As adults, we forget that 17 year olds are still living their | lives in a world of what they don't know, not in what they | know. And once they do know they can be very insistent about | being right. Because, it's all they know. | | It's also how a team of 16-17 yr olds can somehow manage to win | when the odds are completely against them. All they know is | what they want to see happen. And they will keep trying until | they succeed, the clock runs out, or the other team makes it | painfully obvious by completely routing them. | callumprentice wrote: | Interesting, thank you. My assertion was based on my own 17 | year old self, my peers at that time as well as people that | age now. Sounds like the opposite could be true. I find that | quite heartening. | mhh__ wrote: | It's a somewhat common joke in physics departments to compute | something up to (say) N=3 then say "Well if we were | undergraduate students we might compute this up to N=100" | c22 wrote: | Really? In my observations _only_ 17 year olds have the time | and patience to do crap like this. | mhh__ wrote: | Lots of time but no money. | | Like the guy who makes his own chips. Super impressive but | there's no way in hell I could've ever afforded to do that (I | did look into it when I was 18) | furyofantares wrote: | Both things ring fairly true | EvanAnderson wrote: | I don't know about "only", but my observations are that they | do. | | I've volunteered for a youth leadership camp every summer | since 1998. Our attendees are 16-18 y/o males exclusively | (there's a female version of the camp but I don't work there | so I have no opinion on that side). Our attendees have been | thru a selection process, so I'm not seeing a representative | cross section of Ohio, US males of that age. In our sample, | though, the number of focused and determined young men is | very high. | | I'm not at all surprised a 17 y/o would have the drive and | determination to keep trying over and over. Not all of them | are that way-- surely it's a very small percentage. | Nonetheless, that determination isn't an anomaly in my | experience. | todd8 wrote: | Back before the internet, in 1964, I read a brief Scientific | American column on laboratory glass blowing (for making | condensers and so forth). This set me on a quest; and I | acquired supplies and primitive homemade equipment. I was | years away from being able to drive so I took the bus | downtown to the Detroit public library where I found several | books devoted to the subject. I studied these for hours. I | worked on this project for many days. | | I ended up being able to make a few primitive items from my | tubes of glass, but of course, it was a silly pursuit that | led nowhere. So I moved on to my next project, making a solid | fuel rocket from scratch, then an arc furnace, then | gunpowder, then a homemade gas-mask, etc. So it was for a | curious kid in the 60's. I'm lucky I didn't burn down the | house. This of course was made possible by the lack of an | internet (and of course periodicals like Scientific American | back when it was great and really about science). | | I admire the 17-year old in the article for coming up with | something in this age when it is so much easier to entertain | oneself by surfing the net. | RHSeeger wrote: | > So I moved on to my next project, making a solid fuel | rocket from scratch | | Remember when you could get the ingredients to do things | like that easily; sometimes even in a "Science Kit for | Kids!" one would buy at Caldor or the like? Man, how times | have changed. | dsr_ wrote: | In the late 1980s, the toy store at the mall carried a | section of model rockets and rocket engines, igniters... | supermarkets carried cap guns and refills in racks just | before checkout. | OJFord wrote: | Can't you get _actual_ guns at some US supermarkets, in | the 2020s? Meanwhile I 'm pretty sure you can get those | combination cap/spud guns in the seasonal aisle at larger | UK supermarkets, and almost all French^. Funny. | | (^when I was younger I remember being amazed by all the | stuff you could get in French supermarkets, aisles and | aisles of school supplies, summer toys/beach items, | clothes, etc. - seems they were much earlier in that | trend, and still seem to lean further into it, though | it's been a few years since I've been.) | [deleted] | adventured wrote: | Most of the mainstream chain supermarkets in the US don't | sell guns (Kroger, Target, Whole Foods, Costco, | Albertsons, Ahold, Publix, Sams, HEB, Meijer, Aldi, et | al.). Walmart is the primary exception there. | | Overwhelmingly that's now handled by independent gun | stores, or a select few sporting good chains (eg Dick's | Sporting Goods - the largest sporting goods chain in the | US - which sells a restricted set of rifles and a few | shotguns; they came under pressure not long ago to get | rid their guns and they capitulated and reduced what and | how they sell [1]). | | Big corporations in the US are drastically more sensitive | today to gun issues and the related bad PR that goes with | selling guns (even Walmart has rolled back their selling | of guns). | | [1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-dicks-sporting- | goods-deci... | krater23 wrote: | WTF?! You really have Aldi in the US? As a german I never | supposed that. | radicalbyte wrote: | I'm 42, when I sent my mom out with a shopping list for | this stuff as a kid it ended up in her (almost) being | arrested. | todd8 wrote: | Yes, back in the 60's my buddy and I asked our parents to | buy us some powdered aluminum and iron-oxide. We got in | trouble because the chemical supply company warned them | about our requested ingredients. That was the end of our | homemade thermite project. So it was on to another | project, homemade lock-picks. | helge9210 wrote: | > That was the end of our homemade thermite project | | I call it luck. | | I decided not to proceed, when understood, that I have no | way to put it off. | jacquesm wrote: | > I decided not to proceed, when understood, that I have | no way to put it off. | | I didn't :) | | It's all about the quantities. | philipkglass wrote: | You can still do that easily today: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_candy | | I have seen potassium nitrate stump remover on the | shelves at my local Fred Meyer (Kroger). If you can't | find find it on shelves it's easy to order: | | https://www.walmart.com/ip/Potassium-Nitrate- | Powder-99-8-Pur... | | The vast majority of fireworks and rockets I made as a | kid used potassium nitrate as an oxidizer. 5 pounds will | provide many hours of entertainment and education. | mrexroad wrote: | Only if their parents have blocked TikTok, most of YouTube, | and PlayStation. </sarcasm of parent of kids faced with | endless parade of distractions> | tqi wrote: | Have you seen the amount of effort and repetition it takes | to make a TikTok? | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | What kids do depends on lots of things, including the | makeup of the kid. | | None of my 5 were heavy into social media, even tho I was | for 15 years. | | One followed my skillset and became heavy into | computers/electronics (8y-now) and old cars (19y-now). | | The other 4 didn't pickup strong hobbies. I believe it's | because there weren't available examples that fit their | abilities. | | Two settled on gaming (one now a technician tho). One does | music and graphic art. | VLM wrote: | Ironically Minecraft would be good training for this level | of dedication | throwaway14356 wrote: | which says a lot about the state of the industry. | | The best part to me is the large amount of designs one | shouldn't bother to talk about because it is much more | important to hysterically moan about potential perpetual | motion than discus any motor/engine improvement. | Ekaros wrote: | I kinda agree. That is around the age when you still can have | the free time and energy to do what is essentially huge | amount of grind. It is just question where the focus is. It | might be games, books, music, anime and so on. | | Older you get less there is time and energy. And more | responsibilities. | thehappypm wrote: | You can both be right! | ekianjo wrote: | Most 17 years old don't have access to 3d printers. Equipment | is a big factor in making something tangible. | prvc wrote: | They're common in public libraries in many major cities, so | quite a few do. | sudosysgen wrote: | As someone who was in that position 13-17, it's | complicated. Many will refuse to help you if it's a | project with a modicum of risk (like homemade motors) | and/or impose crippling restrictions, at that age. | Consultant32452 wrote: | One third of 17 year olds cannot read at grade level. | OJFord wrote: | Are you sure about that? I don't know when you're allowed | to leave school in the US, but they're pretty popular in | schools - relatively cheap tools & a lot safer than others. | They didn't exist (in the mainstream at least) when I was | at school, but we had laser cutter/engravers for example. I | know which I'd pick if I were in control of the budget (and | had to choose one). | crysin wrote: | My High School which was a fairly well funded public High | School in Illinois, US hadn't upgraded their shop | equipment since the 80s really it felt like. We had wood | tools, saws, the basics only. The coolest thing we had | was a smelting forge, but students weren't allowed to use | it due to safety concerns. This was in the late 2000s. | digitallyfree wrote: | Whether you're able to use the equipment for tasks | outside of the specific class (even if it's school | related like a science fair project) is another issue. | I've seen different schools in the same district do | things differently - one for instance allowed students to | say use the media lab to record a drama production and | had a maker club where students could use the machine | shop for personal projects. Others very strictly | restricted the use of school equipment for the specific | class in question (e.g. only shop class students can use | the machine tools and only for projects related to that | class). It really depends on the instructor and the | school administration. | mhh__ wrote: | I built a niche little bit of tech (not really invention as | much as applying a old idea to a backward field) when I was 19, | I could've kept going but I ran out of money on the 2nd | iteration because RF is an expensive hobby. | melony wrote: | RF is a very, very, expensive hobby. What was the idea you | had for the field? | mhh__ wrote: | Using RF rather than capacitive methods to detect hits | between sabre fencers. | | I built the first one basically out of scraps and rtl SDRs, | second one out of slightly better Chinese crap then ran out | of money. | | Would be a compliance nightmare to sell either iterations. | If I could do it with TDR instead I don't know | dieselgate wrote: | Cool article, engineers gonna engineer! | | Two things that jumped out to me: it's incredibly seeing copper | being compared as the "cheap" alternative! Obviously it would be | compared to rare earth but copper is typically "expensive" in | general or household applications. Also, I had no idea Tesla | motors spin at up to 18k rpm that's just bonkers. Guess it makes | sense because they're single speed(?) Dang, old diesels (kind of | an extreme example, I acknowledge) redline at like 3500 rpm. | zzzeek wrote: | > Instead of using air gaps, Sansone thought he could incorporate | another magnetic field into a motor. This would increase this | saliency ratio and, in turn, produce more torque. His design has | other components, but he can't disclose any more details because | he hopes to patent the technology in the future. | | ah well great, we'll all just twiddle our thumbs waiting on that | then instead of collaborating on how to integrate the good ideas | here into existing large scale manufacturing. | emacsen wrote: | While many of us are against certain types of patents, this is | exactly what patents are for- protecting the invention of an | inventor for a very limited time (20 years, it used to be 7 if | I recall). In return, society gets the invention "source code" | in the form of what is essentially exactly how to reproduce the | invention. | happyopossum wrote: | > ah well great, we'll all just twiddle our thumbs waiting on | that then instead of collaborating on how to integrate the good | ideas here into existing large scale manufacturing. | | So what's your alternative? Inventors are _required_ to share | everything freely, and never profit from their work? | zzzeek wrote: | Firstly, I didn't indicate anyone is _required_ to do | anything. Secondly, you present a false choice. I innovate | with software every day, have published millions of lines of | code with almost no restriction on re-use, I certainly | "profit" via my employment and donations; I'm just not a | billionaire. This inventor is certainly in a great space to | get incredible, lucrative job offers via his fame and | notoriety. | | put another way, what if instead of him inventing a novel way | for a motor to be enhanced, he instead were a physicist who | discovered some new property of physics that basically | allowed the same thing to occur? Do scientific discoveries | get "patents" that prevent anyone else from making use of | that new information for 20 years? | rm_-rf_slash wrote: | It's not that hard to get a provisional patent. And like it or | not the USPTO is a vital institution for incentivizing | innovation and driving growth. | bckr wrote: | This is inspiring, and let's look at why so many of us have the | impulse to figure out what the flaw or missing part of the story | is. | | For me, it's because I hadn't done something so cool at 17. That | makes me think, huh, I wonder if I'm not a "natural born | engineer". I start going through my life story so far and beating | myself up for playing too many video games, or not going deep | enough on my interests. | | Then I start thinking about the ways my life is different from | his. I start to feel resentment about the opportunities I didn't | have, the resources that weren't available. What could I have | done if things had been different? | | Next I start to resent how society scores us on things that can | contribute to the economy, or things that look particularly cool, | and things that we accomplished at a young age. | | And then I start to imagine the difficulties that this young | inventor will have. "Oh yes", I think, "He'll find out soon | enough what the REAL world is like." | | And these thoughts are not who I want to be. But I can reflect | and learn something about myself from them. And I can choose to | go another way. | | I can decide that, if a 17 year old kid with the right resources | and a crazy idea can make something really cool, then I, as an | adult with more experience and resources can make something at | least as cool if I want to. And I'm going to. It's not like my | life is over because I'm older than 17. | | And if this article is making you spiral with insecurity, I hope | you make a similar decision. A decision to be inspired instead of | intimidated. | marginalia_nu wrote: | What irks me is the inappropriate focus on the who over the | what. | | I'd in all honestly be similarly annoyed if the headline said | "57 year old stamp collector from Yorkshire designs a novel | synchronous reluctance motor". | 411111111111111 wrote: | It's the hero worship fetish half of the world has. | | It's never about the achievement, it's about the person that | achieved it. You can very easily find out if wherever you've | the same tendency: just think about the most impressive score | or safe you remember in whatever sport you love. Do you now | think that the deed was impressive or that the person that | did it is the impressive thing? Will you remember the play, | or the person that played? | cheq wrote: | Gave me chills, thanks! | PaulHoule wrote: | If you want to be cynical about it see | | https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/03/why-sc... | | (of course that is another clickbait article from a magazine | that was good before the web but now specializes in clickbait) | ad404b8a372f2b9 wrote: | I remember when I was in high-school agonizing for over a | year over the 100$ fee to publish an app on google play. | | Ultimately it's hard to ignore the pattern when you see the | stories about these precocious kids on the news, they always | come from wealth. | deepspace wrote: | Agree, I was very interested in electronics as a teenager, | but had no money for tools, instruments, or components. I | had to scavenge components from discarded radios, used my | dad's plumber's iron for soldering and saved up for months | for decent wire and a wire stripper. | | I did eventually end up getting a scholarship to study | engineering, but I cannot help feeling a tiny bit resentful | when seeing kids in the news who obviously had a lot of | support from a wealthy family. | jacquesm wrote: | You should not feel resentment, but you should feel their | luck to be born into that. | | On the downside: they will never learn the value of | recycling, of working with inadequate, broken, | uncalibrated and dangerous tools. But you did and I'd bet | you came out the better engineer on account of that. What | doesn't kill you makes you stronger isn't just about | health. | Zagill wrote: | Lately I try to see privileges like that less as an | unfair advantage that someone else has, and more an | unfair disadvantage for everyone else. I want every kid | to have access to high quality education which includes | the tools and materials to work with and learn new | concepts - that's regardless of the socioeconomic class | they were born into. Instead of trying to tear down other | people for the opportunities they had that you didn't, | maybe we should be attempting to improve the world for | everyone so that there's less of those unfair | disadvantages going around. | silisili wrote: | I personally don't think age has anything to do with it. If the | story for some reason said 47 instead of 17, I think comments | would largely be the same. | | So then why? Insecurity may still have a lot to do with it. I | guess a large percentage of people like to either prove others | wrong, or show off intelligence? | | See also, Cunningham's Law. | | https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law | bendbro wrote: | > Next I start to resent how society scores us on things that | can contribute to the economy | | Lol | snapcaster wrote: | Thoughtful post, I think it's such a strong ability to develop | to be able to see this thought process happening in your head | and being aware of it. Thanks for sharing this | nkzd wrote: | Today, my friend and I cynically talked over a beer about this. | We ranted to each other about how we wasted the best years of | our life and how we didn't have the resources or education | other people have right now. This is a defeatist attitude and | your post has inspired me to be better. | | Thank you for writing this. | philosopher1234 wrote: | How important is it to have accomplishments? | bGl2YW5j wrote: | Insightful comments like this are why I love HN. Thank you! | IshKebab wrote: | > why so many of us have the impulse to figure out what the | flaw or missing part of the story is | | Because media LOVES to say "12 year old creates revolutionary | invention!" especially for energy related things and especially | for inventions that aren't revolutionary. Here's a classic | example: | | https://www.wired.com/2011/08/boy-genius-13-year-olds-solar-... | | > 13-year-old Aiden Dwyer has managed to do something that | grown-up scientists haven't. He has wrung up to 50% extra | electricity from regular solar cells. How? Brains, trees, and a | dash of math geekery. | | (It's 100% nonsense.) | | That said it doesn't exactly look like the case here but it's | the obvious null hypothesis. | sbf501 wrote: | > why so many of us have the impulse to figure out what the | flaw or missing part of the story is. | | Why? Because that's literally what engineers are paid to do: | make things, break things, fix things. It's all about tearing | things apart to understand them, and then making them better. | | Just like this kid is doing. I don't think DC motor engineers | took it personally when he decided to "figure out what the | flaw" was in current rare earth magnet designs, right? | | If you take that personally, you're in the wrong field. | barefeg wrote: | I wonder how much classical education hinders this kind of | people. I can see a point in networking, however creating a | network of randomly assigned people doesn't seem so effective. It | might be better to create a network from clubs, etc. | | I never created anything so impressive while young but I was | always curious and building or taking apart stuff. I always felt | school got in the way _. | | _ in the end I stayed all the way until PhD and later changed | careers, but that's a different story | EgoIncarnate wrote: | Impressive to come up with this on his own, but possibly already | patented. Tesla has been using magenets instead of airgaps in | their Internal Permanent Magnet - Synchronous Reluctance Motor | back in 2020. Hopefully his other inovations are more novel. | https://uk.motor1.com/news/462107/video-tesla-model-3-electr... | t_mann wrote: | Minor grammar point: I assume the engineering professor was | _consulted by_ Tesla. 'Consulting with' would mean that he asked | them for help, which would be somewhat less remarkable. | pontifier wrote: | The article teases by opening with a casual mention of "high | speed running boots" but I'm having a devil of a time finding any | info about that. | | I've thought about this a bit myself. About 15 years ago my | unpowered prototype allowed me to speed walk about as fast as I | could sprint. Only problem was my ankles kept hitting each | other... Very painful. | | Sounds like a very inventive and interesting guy rather than a | one trick pony. Good luck! | vidanay wrote: | "I heard some guy invented a car that gets 100mpg and lasts for | 30 years, but the auto industry and oil industry had him killed." | whatshisface wrote: | It adds to the humor that the two numbers you quoted might | actually be achievable. | perf1 wrote: | Aren't most anti aircraft missiles heat seeking? Could also be | a reason why 60% of the engine energy need to go into creating | heat. Otherwise cheap gas engine drones that can't be | intercepted and can fly thousand of miles could be really | dangerous. | throwaway14356 wrote: | stan meyer (infamous for claiming his dune buggy ran on | water) did a hilarious talk where he described pvc tube | rockets filled with water used both as the propellant and the | explosives. Mass produced they would cost 5 dollar[sic] | | The war we could give.. | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote: | Yes, it's called Carnot's conspiracy. | ZeroGravitas wrote: | My own conspiracy theory is that the only reason this story got | traction is because it carefully sends the message "EVs are not | sustainable, and might never be". | | There's enough people being paid to tell clear lies that I | don't feel I'm paranoid to suggest that writing such an article | (which seems very careful to not be particularly positive about | current EVs) might get you money from fossil fuel interests | and/or they'd hype it for visibility. | justapassenger wrote: | There's this car that runs on WATER, man! | Reason077 wrote: | > _" The video explained that most electric car motors require | magnets made from rare-earth elements"_ | | For years, Tesla exclusively used induction motors with no | permanent magnets. It's only relatively recently (when the Model | 3 was released) that they started using permanent magnets in | order to gain a few % better efficiency. | | Even now, dual-motor cars often pair an induction motor with a | permanent magnet motor. This configuration has various | advantages: the induction motor can spin freely with no | resistance when no power is required, so using one of each | provides the best combination of efficiency and power. | tunesmith wrote: | Now I want to know more about his "high-speed running boots". | causi wrote: | BEVs like Teslas already have a rare-earth-free induction motor | in them. They use an additional rare earth motor for efficiency, | which in the Model S and X gets them ten percent greater range. | The way this article conveniently ignores that fact leads me to | believe there's no chance of the modified synchronous reluctance | motor exceeding the efficiency of the induction motor and | therefore will have no impact on the electric car industry. | | Mighty impressive work from a teenager, though. | Comevius wrote: | This is always the case when these young and wealthy prodigies | are being covered by the media. They always invent a toy that | the industry already tried or keep trying to make practical. | Practical as in not just performance, but cost too. | skapadia wrote: | I missed the part that said his family is wealthy. Can you | point me to that? | Comevius wrote: | I wish I could be as innocent as you. Science fairs are for | rich kids. | | Here is Robert, 17, currently working on his Private Pilot | Certificate. His hobby is dicking around with 3D printers | and drones. | | https://linkedin.com/in/robert-sansone-62116b1b7 | | I don't even want to link the second winner, but he is very | connected in Saudi Arabia. Let's just leave it there. | deepspace wrote: | Just look at the photos. Only a fairly wealthy family could | afford to buy him those instruments, and of course, the raw | materials for the motors. Even his clothing suggests that | there is no lack of money. | marshray wrote: | For what it's worth, that is cheap no-name Chinese test | equipment he's using. | | Probably a $300-400 setup, which is not nothing, but well | within reach of most families. | stjohnswarts wrote: | Or mowing a few lawns. I pay the teen who mows my small | front and back yards $40. It's not a big deal. He's done | in 30-40 minutes and moves to the neightbors down the | street. This is just a couple weekends of side hustle. | dicknuckle wrote: | Benefit of the doubt: it could be a local makerspace. | Although he's working on his pilot license so yes, he's a | rich kid. | [deleted] | Workaccount2 wrote: | A group of engineers run the numbers on a thursday afternoon | and see immediately that it just isn't practical/possible. | The idea dies without ever getting out of the lab or even off | the whiteboard. | | A kid stumbles into the idea though and has the gumption to | actually carry it all the ways to a "working" prototype, | which inevitably wows everyone who isn't in the field (pretty | much everybody). | unethical_ban wrote: | You say this like it's a bad thing. | causi wrote: | Frankly you could filter out every HN submission with the | phrase "-year old" and miss absolutely nothing of value. | marshray wrote: | It's about the lifecycle of the inventor, not the motor, | silly. | | Even though the probability is low that he is founding a | revolution in magnetodynamics, I personally found this | story more inspiring than a blog post about the latest | front-end Javascript framework. | idiotsecant wrote: | Yeah, stupid kids learning about things with real world | projects. They aren't state of the art at all! | Double_a_92 wrote: | The kid is absolutely not stupid. But the media | sensationalizing trivial stories is. | | Most likely this is an already existing design, which is | rarely used because of something that makes it | impracticable on a bigger scale. | | But because some smart kid happened to toy around with | it, it's suddenly the new technology that will | revolutionize the car business. | goldenchrome wrote: | I get what you're saying but the headlines tend to imply | that they're state of the art (like this one). It always | takes a knowledgeable someone in the comments to bring | this fact to light, which makes me think it's usually | clickbait. Kudos to the kid, but less kudos to the | journalist. | gigatexal wrote: | Kudos to this kid and all his accomplishments to this point. | Here's to a future of many many more. I sure as hell wasn't this | accomplished at 17. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-11 23:00 UTC)