[HN Gopher] Logistics, How Did They Do It, Part III: On the Move ___________________________________________________________________ Logistics, How Did They Do It, Part III: On the Move Author : Tomte Score : 141 points Date : 2022-08-12 16:00 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (acoup.blog) (TXT) w3m dump (acoup.blog) | loufe wrote: | This has been one of my favourite of his series. I've been | thinking about making a game with some of my friends to model the | complexity of moving an army around. | h2odragon wrote: | units pushed too hard take a few days of, or go ravage the | countryside, or decide to assisnate the general... like | Rimworld but the units you're trying to control hate you a lot | more and are willing to do something about it. | | Let the user decimate units for indiscipline and stuff too. or | hang cheating officers to win troop loyalty. Could be a real | favorite of sadists _and_ masochist. | shakezula wrote: | the first two parts of this blog post series absolutely blew my | mind and changed how I think about an army in the real world. | | Can't wait to read this post. | jalino23 wrote: | this is such a good find! I've been playing age of empires 4 and | got really interested in the military before gunpowder | antonymy wrote: | Have enjoyed this series a lot. His whole blog is great and you | can easily spend hours reading through his lengthy, well- | researched posts if you have an interest in premodern military | history or topics that brush up against it (i.e. strategy video | games, fantasy literature, etc). | ju-st wrote: | Absolutely, I was so proud of my Google skills for finding this | blog three weeks ago, and now it's on top of Hackernews. The | series about the decline of the Roman empire is amazing. | ttr2021 wrote: | Mind blown. So many variables to consider, so many options. | Excellent read. | 7373737373 wrote: | I'd love to read something similar about how taxation and the | management and securement of (moving or fixed) gold/money | reserves worked back then in practice. | shakezula wrote: | Agreed. The author makes a few comments in the second part of | the series about how ships of gold were the main way to ferry | money around and how if that went wrong it had sweeping | consequences, too. Would be a really interesting series fro | this author. | cwillu wrote: | I believe his fall of rome series has more on this; | specifically about how there are multiple stable attractors | in the economic capacity space. | | There's also the series on the defense of cities, the series | on bread and the one on clothing. | | Oh, and the series on steel production. | | You know what? Just read everything he's written. | danielheath wrote: | Recommend Scott's "Against The Grain" for that! Chapter four | specifically. | 78124781 wrote: | Amazing work from Bret as usual, but very sad that this kind of | popular/actually useful history is completely unrewarded in | academia. This is far more valuable than whatever top university | press book most historians write. | wjnc wrote: | It's entertainment. Academia shouldn't be entertainment, at | least that is my opinion. I've seen more than a few erstwhile | respected professors turn into talking heads without much | substance by sudden media fame. One of the better stories was | the one that started bringing in his own newspaper clippings to | the universities media department in order to rank higher on | the yearly media ranking. After that he rented an apartment | near Harvard and bought Harvard professors lunch to publish the | photos. | | I think Bret rightfully treats it as a secondary career and | that his patrons are very right to support him. | Manuel_D wrote: | This is much more than entertainment. These posts have | citations and the same academic rigor as a typical academic | publication. They're just packaged in a more approachable and | accessible format. | | However, these posts are not doing original research which | does distinguish them from the main activity of academics. | They're essentially brief survey papers (works that summarize | the existing publications on a given topic). This is not a | knock against ACoUP. These posts are excellent and I enjoy | them immensely. They're just not setting out to accomplish | the objectives that most academics are trying to achieve. | inglor_cz wrote: | Academia has a serious problem with snobbery. Few other | workplaces in the world have denser concentrations of people | who think really highly of themselves, even though they | wouldn't admit it openly and their preferred way of war is | tons and tons of plausibly deniable passive aggression. | | This snobbery problem opens a bigger chasm between the | academics and the general public that would otherwise be | necessary, and the political consequences down the line might | be serious; if academics are perceived as out of touch, aloof | and intentionally incomprehensible, the backlash won't be | just anti-snobbish, but anti-intellectual, with possible dire | consequences for the viability and vibrancy of Western | civilization. | | But the fact that popularizers like Bret Devereaux reap so | much open disdain indicates that few activities are so | unpopular among the gatekeepeers than building bridges across | said chasm. _A True Intellectual Must Be Dour At All Costs._ | marcosdumay wrote: | I'd say it's education. | | Academia ostensibly has a dual focus, on both research and | education. But the really is usually different from that | messaging. | trebbble wrote: | > It's entertainment. | | Complete disagreement here. Informative writing may serve as | entertainment, but if it's done well, that's not _all_ it is. | It helps people understand the world, which can provide all | kinds of benefits beyond keeping them from being bored for a | few minutes. | | In fact, this type of work is _precisely_ how people learn | almost everything, right up to grad school, which means it 's | the way the _overwhelming majority_ of education is | conducted. Most people going through that aren 't doing it | for _entertainment_. Hell, Spivak 's _Calculus_ is more on | this level--presenting findings to non-experts--than it is an | _academic_ endeavor, and no one dismisses that as just being | _entertainment_. | | It may not be valuable to people who are _already_ experts in | a field, so may not be properly "academic", but this | categorization of acoup (and anything like this work) as | simply entertainment is going way too far. | jcranmer wrote: | Bret actually has an entire thread on this in Twitter (https: | //twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1513255197597966341), | responding to someone calling him "the orc logistics guy". | | The tl;dr is basically that part of an academic's job is to | educate not just the professionals but also the lay public. | By using fantasy and other pop culture works, he's | introducing pretty important military history and theory | concepts to those who wouldn't otherwise attempt to wade into | it--and if they enjoy it, they might come back for some more | pressing and serious can't-sugarcoat-this topics such as the | implications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. | | In general, I would say that academics all too commonly | forget the need to engage with people outside of their narrow | disciplines, and in doing so, you can cede the field to | engaging writers who are way out of their depths and horribly | wrong about what they are writing (e.g., Jared Diamond). | leto_ii wrote: | > writers who are way out of their depths and horribly | wrong about what they are writing (e.g., Jared Diamond). | | Could you elaborate a bit? | | Myself I found his books quite compelling. I'm of course | not an anthropologist, historian etc. so I may be missing | something big. | _delirium wrote: | > In general, I would say that academics all too commonly | forget the need to engage with people outside of their | narrow disciplines, and in doing so, you can cede the field | to engaging writers who are way out of their depths and | horribly wrong about what they are writing (e.g., Jared | Diamond). | | Maybe I'm misunderstanding the Diamond example here, but I | think of him as precisely a cautionary tale for academics, | of what can go wrong when they try to go too far in the | pop-science, big-picture, broad-audience direction. Diamond | is solidly an academic, not some kind of outsider... he's | held a professorship at UCLA for 50+ years. But later in | his career decided he wanted to write "big history" | interdisciplinary synthesis for a popular audience. | | I suppose one could try to write for a popular audience | without going that far outside your own | discipline/expertise though. | horsawlarway wrote: | I believe you've misunderstood the parent comment. | | Also - generally speaking, I think being able to speak | (or write) in a manner that's compelling for audiences | across broad backgrounds, rather than just their niche | community is a skillset to be admired. | | Science does nothing if people do not believe in it, or | do not engage with it. | | I definitely agree that this does not give academics | license to veer entirely outside of their expertise and | use their credentials in the field to hide this (eg: | Diamond). But I think not trying at all is worse. Far | worse. | Manuel_D wrote: | Diamond is pretty well regarded even in among academic | historians. I strongly suspect believe that | /r/anthropology is responsible for this perspective that | Diamond is poorly regarded among historians. Almost any | serious historian agrees with his thesis: larger arable | land coupled with crops and animals more suitable for | domestication led to greater population levels and social | development in Eurasia than in the Americas, which is the | main reason why the Columbian exchange was so one-sided. | Diamonds ideas laid the foundations of many serious and | well regarded historians, like Ian Morris. | | I'm also seriously baffled by people who try to portray | his views as racist of eurocentric. His preface | explicitly spells out that Europe was a backwater until | the early modern period. In fact, a large part of the | motivation behind _Guns, Germs, and steel_ was to debunk | the idea of wester cultural or racial superiority, and | provide a compelling counter narrative to those | explanations of Eurasian-American divergence. | icegreentea2 wrote: | I think as categories, popular education material and more | scholarly work are equally important (just look at Bret's | citations...). | | I think it is fair to say that the marginal value of one extra | ACOUP sized blogpost of high quality popular education material | is probably higher than one extra book, but that comes down to | the relatively lack of high quality popular education material. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-12 23:00 UTC)