[HN Gopher] Ask HN: Are Linux HowTos dead? Why? ___________________________________________________________________ Ask HN: Are Linux HowTos dead? Why? Somehow it just got me: Linux HowTos haven't been created or maybe even updated since ca. 2007. https://www.linuxhowtos.org/ I haven't been using them for last 20 years... I still remember how useful they were in my early Linux days in 1999-2002. I will never forget the one about making coffee (http://fotis.home.cern.ch/fotis/Coffee.html). I made the relay circuit built into a power supply and that was so much fun! But now they are all forgotten. Dead even. Why? Author : piotrke Score : 51 points Date : 2022-08-13 20:59 UTC (2 hours ago) | samsquire wrote: | If you want high quality resources and skill and talent, you need | to pay for it. I don't think Linux HowTos was a paid service such | as lwn.net | dcminter wrote: | I think the simple answer is that distributions got a whole bunch | of polish and automation. | | I install Ubuntu these days by building a boot drive using a gui | tool, then just clicking my way through the installers. Getting | online involves ... typing in my password. In the late 90s I had | to figure out AT commands and set up ppp and so on, and getting | X11 up and running required config voodoo. | | I miss some of it. Not that much though. | throwaway892238 wrote: | The linked site isn't where most HOWTOs were kept; they resided | at https://tldp.org/ | | Are they dead? Not _completely_ dead, but there is only one or | two people still maintaining the site + HOWTOs (they organize on | GitHub and a mailing list currently). But there 's simply nobody | volunteering to maintain them or write new articles. | | Why is that? Because popular things get action and unpopular | things don't. HOWTOs aren't popular. | | Why is that? Because blogs and the invention of "Q&A sites" made | them unnecessary. Before you would use a HOWTO to teach yourself | everything about a specific piece of software or technical thing. | Now you don't really need to learn an entire thing. You can just | google the one question you have, get the answer, and move on. | You still don't know how 98% of that thing works, but you fixed | your problem. Since this solves most people's problems, they | don't see value in taking the time to write an entire HOWTO, | which may take weeks to months for a really good HOWTO. | Similarly, users don't look for them because nobody's writing | them. There is no incentive anymore. | | SEO is part of the reason that traffic began being moved towards | blogs and Q&A sites. But SEO alone didn't bring about the | cultural shift towards snippets of answers. It was simply a new | generation that learned tech outside of the old OSS community, | and developed their own ways of learning. Just like the old OSS | community created their own way of learning different than their | previous generation. | musicale wrote: | Google/copy/paste/repeat is the quick and mindless replacement | for read/understand/write/debug. | | It works pretty well for AI and humans apparently. | zozbot234 wrote: | > Before you would use a HOWTO to teach yourself everything | about a specific piece of software or technical thing.' | | The whole point of HOWTO's as a documentation format is that | they don't try to do this; rather, they address specific user | needs. They're somewhat like the "next step" beyond simple Q&A | and FAQ collections, and this is where much of their value | could still be found. | stop50 wrote: | Except for a few programs like ss or nftables nothing has | changed. you can still use shred, despite the usage of journaled | filesystems, cp works like 20 years ago and nothing has changed | with ln and i make still errors with the target and the source. | so the old howtos are still valid. | raggi wrote: | ln works just like cp. | | Use the -r flag if you're on GNU for easier relative link | creation. | willnonya wrote: | This is misleading, plenty has changed and Linux backwards | compatibility is horrendous on a good day. | toast0 wrote: | The whole networking userspace is changed. | | There's no ifconfig, netstat, route, iptables, ipchains, I | think there was one more. pumpd is dead, isc-dhcpd is probably | dead (replaced by systemd-dhcpd). | | It's not really recognizable. | gattilorenz wrote: | ALSA, sysV init, xf86config ramdac settings... and a million | other things, not just networking | Tao3300 wrote: | Stackoverflow et al probably win the search results. The | landscape is also too diverse to write a howto that would be very | broadly applicable. | teddyh wrote: | What I miss more is the "rtfm.mit.edu" FTP site, which was a | repository for all the FAQ's of all the Usenet newsgroups. I | don't even know if it was mirrored anywhere. | | (I know about faqs.org, but those are frequently wildly out of | date compared with those on rtfm.mit.edu, which seemed to be | continously updated.) | progbits wrote: | Not hard to find: | | https://archive.org/details/ftp_rtfm.mit.edu_2014.07 | | https://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/usenet/... | teddyh wrote: | Nice, thanks! Now, assuming that at least some FAQ's kept | updating even after 2015, where do these new FAQ's get | collected? | | EDIT: I just found <http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/doc/faqs/> | (and <ftp://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/doc/faqs;type=d>) which seems to | be exactly what I am looking for! It has updates until about | 2018, which seems reasonable. | pxc wrote: | The best Linux HOWTOs I ever read were all in print magazines | about Linux. Those that are still around still do them! | benjaminpv wrote: | While formal HOWTOs might not get much attention, it's pretty | clear Linux tutorials of all types are both being made and | consumed in a variety of media. People often bring up how much | value they get out of the articles DigitalOcean puts together, | for instance. Those aren't HOWTOs necessarily, but does it | matter? | | There's also the fact that people just consume that kind of | content differently nowadays. While it's hard for me to | understand, people younger than myself seem to get a lot out of | guided video tutorials over text. | HankB99 wrote: | Bad SEO I suppose. When I search for something, I often get a | page by some "expert" in which the information is wrong, commands | don't work and so on. I wish I could figure out how to eliminate | them from my search results. The worst part is that it is usually | impossible to contact the author and point out the errors. Like | they would care. | LtWorf wrote: | I think there is a law in India mandating everyone to open a | blog and explain linux to people. This must be done in the | first 3 months of learning linux. | bediger4000 wrote: | This is certainly true for RaspberryPi tutorials about | interfacing with thermometers or other sensors. All the DHT-11 | tutorials seem like minor mods of some long lost original, | except with new spelling mistakes, and inaccurate pinouts. | | This would seem to confirm that advertising ultimately corrupts | ad-supported media | bitxbitxbitcoin wrote: | The YouTube videos are better because they need it to work on | screen. | bediger4000 wrote: | Videos are slow, and it's hard to re watch tricky pieces or | compare with other sources. | hanble wrote: | Unfortunately you're probably right. SEO optimized pages have | basically taken over most search results, even when they have | glaring mistakes :( | akkartik wrote: | Bad OSE (optimizations on the part of the search engine), you | mean. | DelightOne wrote: | If we could get the search results from a couple years ago, | without the SEO. | rob_c wrote: | Let's be honest Google is having a problem dealing with | actual intelligence writing bad stuff as well as surgical | intelligence rehashing things. Just because half the internet | writes a thing doesn't make it true. And again just because | the airport writes it doesn't mean it's tested. Figuring that | out by raw ML and no context of the material is probably not | going to end well. I think the only solution is will be to | keep an updated truth curated by experts humans. | | Compared to the 90s where spam was spam and three internet | was more for the tech savvy it's changed. | tenebrisalietum wrote: | Full-Internet search is dead. Collect and share bookmarks. | yieldcrv wrote: | Webrings rise once again | davidhaymond wrote: | So we basically need to go back to the days when Yahoo! was | simply a directory of links to cool websites. Curated by | humans. | makapuf wrote: | Dmoz ftw! | alexott wrote: | Imho, the reason for it is that now we have much more sources of | information. How tos were a concentrated pieces of information | distributed with Linux distributions or via slow mediums... 20+ | years ago I was involved 8th Russian translation of many how to's | and they were used because there were no other sources of | information, but now you can just translate almost any page to | language that you need | [deleted] | larrydag wrote: | Personally I believe Linux has matured to a pretty decent | usability level for the average user. Ubuntu, Opensuse, Linux | Mint and some of the like have taken a lot of the hard work out | of managing and installing a linux OS. It used to be that you | would slave hours of getting your specific hardware to work with | a particular flavor of Linux. Now you have drivers that are | plentiful and up to date, bugs that get fixed fast, and large | communities at near enterprise levels maintaining the updates. | Frankly a pretty good time to be a Linux user. | l33t2328 wrote: | Are there any, I don't know, archives of what it used to be | like to install linux? My first linux experience was Ubuntu | maybe a decade so ago and it installed fine. | pjmlp wrote: | Enjoy, | | https://www.linux.co.cr/distributions/review/1994/0703-b.htm. | .. | willnonya wrote: | While the Linux installers and hardware support have improved | more than any other part of Linux distros hardware support | still lags well behind actual hardware availability. | | That you belive that the installers have advanced to "average | user" level really misses the point though. The rest of the os | is as disjointed and messy as ever. | zaat wrote: | Not an answer to why it is dead, but the Archlinux wiki, which | offers decent replacement for the functional part of the | traditional HOWTOs, have been around since 2005 and have | established itself as a decent info source for Linux users at | large, not just the arch initiates. | worg wrote: | Second ArchWik it's quite good and not tied to archlinux | bluedino wrote: | Linux community documentation falls into a few categories: | | 1. Copypasta that appears on many different websites. Usually the | first hits in Google. Usually terrible. | | 2. Curated, quality material on sites like Linode or Digital | Ocean. | | 3. Blogs from people who actually work with the stuff and have | ran into interesting problems/solutions. Can vary but usually | pretty good. | | 4. Distro docs like Arch wiki | pyrophane wrote: | I think at this point the Arch Wiki has supplanted all other | sources as the definitive source of Linux howtos, given the size | of the community and its values. | elaus wrote: | Personally, I get almost all my Linux "how-tos" from either | Stackoverflow or, for more basic questions, ubuntuusers.de. | | The latter one is a German wiki that has a similar premise to | linuxhowtos.org, but it seems to be much more active and most | entries I was looking at were up-to-date. Kinda weird because I | consume tech articles and man pages almost exclusively in English | - with the big exception of ubuntuusers.de because there doesn't | seem to be a good counterpart within the first few Google/kagi | results. | jacquesm wrote: | Mostly because Linux is 'good enough' for most use cases out of | the box nowadays. Between Ubuntu, Debian and a bunch of other | distros there is one out there for everybody with most of the | stuff that you'd need a howto for in the past working out of the | box. This is a positive development imo. | xd wrote: | Everything got to complex.. way to many variables for even the | simplest of jobs these days. | indymike wrote: | The site is dead because of lack of maintenance and everyone | hosting their own how-to content on their github, podcast, | youtube, website and Q&A site. If this was re-imagined, it might | be an aggregator that served as a directory to all the howto | content... | Rackedup wrote: | Yeah it's been a while since I consulted a leggit HOWTO... I | think that HOWTOs get created by volunteers all over the web | nowadays. | pengaru wrote: | Practically nobody writes classic HOWTOs anymore. | | At best you get amateurs speaking authoritatively on subjects | they've barely scratched the surface of in blog posts they can | try monetize, at worst you get the same thing but in the form of | a youtube video. | qbasic_forever wrote: | I dunno IMHO there's a lot of rose colored glasses looking back | at them. I cut my teeth learning Linux in the era of howtos and | such of the late 90s/2000s, and it was a real mess. Someone on | an IRC channel would tell you to RTFM and point at a guide, | you'd read it and slog through pages and pages of bloviation | about unix philosophy, incredible minutia about every CLI | parameter (half of which don't exist anymore) or whatever and | be even more confused than when you started. You'd go back to | IRC and someone else would say oh yeah don't read that guide, | it's old and not up to date. Here read this guide... and the | process starts over again. There were some good guides, but it | was really hard to find them and sort out the good from the | bad. | pengaru wrote: | I spent my teens installing linux from floppies and Infomagic | CDs. Back then the distro would often by default include the | howtos package bringing in the whole enchilada of knowledge. | | They were generally relevant to the versions of software | included, and updated when the rest of the system did. | | Things started getting messy as everyone got connected 24x7 | and increasingly diverged from what packages distros were | shipping, and of course the HOWTOs in general just stopped | getting maintained/created until we arrived at today's | misery. | zbird wrote: | Or a podcast. | la64710 wrote: | We should revive the HOWTOs .. | guestbest wrote: | Until HowTo's get sponsorship, like streaming, that is how it | is going to be. Not that enough people RTFM to make it | worthwhile. The best way to explain Linux is socially, though. | zbird wrote: | The best way to learn a subject is from an authoritative | source. 'socially' results in a whole bunch of misinformation | and wrong practices, like PHP developers chmod'ing 777 the | hell out of the system because they don't understand what the | fuck they are doing. | ge96 wrote: | In today's OpenCV video, we'll show you how to find the red cup | just like the docs. | zbird wrote: | Make sure to smash that Like and subscribe and button. | | This video is sponsored by SKYN condoms. Get a 6-pack for | just $8.99 that you can truly feel. | | And now for the red cup with OpenCV. | shaky-carrousel wrote: | Nah, real linux hackers go raw. | bayindirh wrote: | Honestly, I still write them. Either for my private documents | or office documents. | | I'm planning to open my personal trove step by step, on my self | hosted server, via a static site. They are Linux/development | documents too. | | Note: No ads, no tracking, GFDL licensed. | | There's some preliminary stuff I wrote: | https://bayindirh.lists.sh/Useful%20technical%20documents | pengaru wrote: | The linked Evernote pages don't even render here (noscript). | Following a long delay it just shows a blank page. | | Excellent demonstration of how awful the status quo is vs. | opening local files in /usr/share/doc/howto/txt/ with `less`. | hwers wrote: | Same. Things are getting so noisy and hard to find that even | if good howtos exist somewhere on the internet, finding it | can waste hours vs just word searching your own documents. | maven29 wrote: | Limiting the search to github gists as a first option is a | pretty decent way to escape the machine generated algorithmic | SEO garbage. | qbasic_forever wrote: | Digital Ocean's guides are IMHO the spiritual successor: | https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials | NelsonMinar wrote: | The state of Linux docs as seen through Google is appalling. | Searing for things like "how to set up rsnapshot backups" are | full of garbage articles that are 800 words like whose only | actual content is "apt install rsnapshot". Maybe this is a Google | problem. | | It doesn't help the Ubuntu docs have fallen into total disrepair. | Most searches for information there find 6 year old stuff that's | no longer relevant. Major sections of manuals have apparently | been abandoned. | | The bright spot is Arch Linux; that wiki is amazing. I now am | adding Arch to most of my search queries even though I have no | intention of ever using Arch. | jzawodn wrote: | Wow. This post reminded me that I wrote a HOWTO 20+ years ago: | | https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Emacs-Beginner-HOWTO.html | | It's still sorta relevant, I guess... | | What a blast from the past. | zbird wrote: | People don't read anymore these days. | | Which explains why so much of modern software sucks. | docandrew wrote: | Eh, I'd argue the opposite: developers expect the end-user to | rely on Stack Overflow or perusing GitHub issues to figure | out how to use their product, instead of making easy-to-use | products. | kodah wrote: | I used to write articles like this for my blog. There's a reason | they really don't exist anymore: | | First is that documentation has gotten much better. A lot of | times a repository will have examples alongside it. Man pages, | help menus, and entire statically generated documentation sites | have all advanced this quite a bit - and much of what they do | share space with what I used to write about. It's worth | mentioning that a lot of times, I was writing to a very | _specific_ end goal. Documentation sites will usually what you | through what I did and then some. | | Second is that Linux userlands have diverged a lot. There's not a | ton of standardization around userspace tooling, so it makes | writing an article (that needs to be updated) an up-hill battle. | | Third, Linode and DigitalOcean use these kinds of articles as PR. | They're high quality, often versioned, and help users understand | broader contexts as well. | | So, are they dead? Yes, in a sense. They inspired a lot though, | so in that way I think they still live on. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-13 23:00 UTC)