[HN Gopher] Habitual GPS use negatively impacts spatial memory d... ___________________________________________________________________ Habitual GPS use negatively impacts spatial memory during self- guided navigation Author : goplayoutside Score : 52 points Date : 2022-08-14 20:38 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (TXT) w3m dump (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) | chippytea wrote: | One of the things I like to do when I go somewhere new is try to | drive (or often cycle) back home without using my phone. I get | lost sometimes, but I feel a silly sense of achievement when I | make it back home without checking my phone. I enjoy the | challange and I also learn a lot about my local area. There are | many businesses in my city that I discovered only because I was | trying to memorise a route. | avl999 wrote: | I am practically incapable of navigating without GPS/Google maps. | ghaff wrote: | Well, you have to prep. And, to be honest, if you're by | yourself you're probably going to be balancing a map on your | lap someplace if it's not straightforward. | | There's also the old movie/TV trope where, typically, the guy | refuses to stop at a gas station to ask for directions if | they're lost. Which has now (mostly) joined the trope of not | being able to reach someone just because they're not in the | physical location you expect them to be. | nso95 wrote: | It's true, but how does one deal with it? | kelnos wrote: | Easy: use GPS less. Maybe rely on it for your first trip | somewhere new, but after that, try to navigate by memory. And | even when you've gone somewhere new, try to find your way back | home without the GPS. For locations that you frequent, don't | use the GPS at all. Often I'll do a quick GPS check for places | like that just to see if my normal route is clear of bad | traffic, and then travel without it running. | | Yes, you'll get lost occasionally, but that's ok. You'll still | have the GPS if you get hopelessly lost and give up. | devchix wrote: | Yes but a major part of wayfinding now is to route around | traffic. I know my way to work every day but still turn on | GPS because I don't know where accident and detours might be | happening. | BrentOzar wrote: | Habitual calculator usage negatively impacts basic mathematics | skills, film at 11. | acidburnNSA wrote: | And I'm guessing habitual recall via Google query negatively | impacts memory recall skills. News at 11:30. | thewarrior wrote: | I have been wondering recently whether this is a bad thing. | Because having the right ideas in memory is often required | for making creative leaps. Relying too much on google can | actually inhibit creativity. | acidburnNSA wrote: | I used to worry that it was bad, but now I've embraced it. | I try to know just enough to synthesize new thoughts but | can defer to Google for details. | throwawaysleep wrote: | On the other hand, Google lets you actually find | information rather than just wishing you had it. | | https://imgur.io/pumgE | | Do I remember a lower percentage of the facts I have | encountered in life than others? Almost certainly. But I | also bet that I have encountered vastly more as a result. | nonrandomstring wrote: | > Google lets you actually find information rather than | just wishing you had it. | | Correct. And that's a problem. | | The "wishing you had it" part is actually really | important. | | Creativity and understanding isn't just assembling a | jigsaw puzzle of discrete information facts. Holding | together a mental model, including many partial and | missing pieces of information, is how innovative leaps | occur. | | A Google driven life, treading over popular, permitted | pathways is comfortable and convenient but requires only | some small fraction of the adult human brain. More is not | necessarily more when it comes to information. | potatoman22 wrote: | I don't think it's bad overall. Web search has essentially | extended our recall abilities to everything that's easily | searchable if you have a device on hand. | someweirdperson wrote: | Only arithmetics skills, not basic mathematics skills in | general. | tshaddox wrote: | Habitual flint and pyrite usage negatively impacts basic bow | drill fire making skills. | abnry wrote: | I enjoy navigating without gps. I can always memorize most of the | way there as it is usually just following main roads. It is the | last portion that can be hardest. I like to think of directions | in terms of "topological complexity". If it is just off a highway | or off of a road off the highway it is easy to navigate to. Has | nothing to do with how far away it is or how familiar I am with | the area. | | Similar to this is the fact that it is always easier to navigate | home than to a new place. In the former, you are aiming for the | web of roads that you recognize. In the latter, it is a specific | point. | zxcvbn4038 wrote: | I'm more the opposite - I spent decades driving without GPS, | and I got to see very little of where I went because I'm trying | to read a map or atlas, not crash into anyone, and cross six | lanes of traffic because the exit is on the opposite side of | the highway. I drove the equivalent of twelve times around the | equator and it was all a blur. With GPS I can actually look | beyond the car in front of me and enjoy seeing what I am | driving through. In recent years I've started setting the Avoid | Highways feature and taking back roads everywhere - no traffic, | no cops, no people driving crazy, lots of wildlife, lots of | sights, cheap gas, etc. generally only adds an hour to my | travel time. | matwood wrote: | I agree on all points. I remember driving from Paris to | Epinal using printed out directions. At some point after the | 15 roundabout we had no idea where we were. Luckily we were | are to speak with some nice people to help guide us the rest | of the way, but we almost missed the time we had to be at our | destination. | dsomers wrote: | News flash, when you stop practicing a skill you get worse at | that skill. Really insightful study, grade A hackernews content | right here. I can't wait for Malcom Gladwell to write a book on | this so we can get a deeper dive on it. | DaltonCoffee wrote: | "Every extension of mankind, especially technological extensions, | has the effect of amputating or modifying some other | extension[...] The extension of a technology like the automobile | "amputates" the need for a highly developed walking culture, | which in turn causes cities and countries to develop in different | ways. The telephone extends the voice, but also amputates the art | of penmanship gained through regular correspondence. ways." -- | Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man | | Love this quote, and many others by MM. Utterly blows my mind how | we seem to be failing to apply and extend his teachings to help | understand this modernity beta test we're participating in. | nonrandomstring wrote: | I think you'd really like Lewis Mumford too. | | Ellul, Mumford, McLuhan, Postman and Illich constitute | (accessible [1]) Technological Critique 101. I think they are | essential reading for anyone who claims to be a "technologist" | and wants to deeply understand the anthropological relations of | humans and our technology. | | [1] Without digging into Heidegger and more difficult stuff. | bmitc wrote: | Damn, how have I not heard of Marshall McLuhan before? Getting | that book now. | tootie wrote: | I think "obviate" is a better term than "amputate". I mean, who | the hell cares about penmanship? Absolutely useless skill. | lock-the-spock wrote: | While I empathise with your position I can totally see how | others might not. Letter writing is a specific skill to | provide a dense and clear message. You have to prepare this | message in your head first as you cannot (attractively) | eliminate what you wrote already unless you redo the whole | letter. Im sure many people today would have benefitted from | more occasions to hone thinking and preparation ahead of | expressing views or opinions. | | Similarly you could say remembering phone numbers is a | useless skill that many had pre smartphones - you just knew | your 30 or so most used numbers. Now we all depend on our | phones and once the battery is dead many people don't seem to | know _any_ number by heart. | whiddershins wrote: | I would recommend (the now outdated) The Brain that Changes | Itself. All about nueroplasticiy. The brain will literally | prune what you don't use, and certain skills, such as the | fine motor skills required by developing penmanship, can | plausibly have wide reaching impact one way or the other. | Bolkan wrote: | On a related note, playing far cry 2 without using the handheld | map and walking everywhere did wonders for my spatial memory. The | game is gorgeous and full of tiny details so it isn't as boring | as it might sound. | | Each mission starts with an npc giving you the location of your | target (safehouse 2 miles east of shanty town, outpost south of | lumber yard). Sun can be used as a compass (when it's not | raining). After a while you start to recognize the landmarks and | don't need the map anymore. | daleharvey wrote: | I spend a lot of time outdoors / hillwalking / mountain climbing | in Scotland and it is quite fustrating and in my opinion quite | dangerous how technophobic the standard advice given is. | | Almost universally guides and mountain rescue people will advise | that people should carry and have knowledge of how to use a map | and compass, inform that a phone with GPS is to be used as a | backup with no advice given on how to use it. | | Navigating with a map and compass is a difficult skill that takes | a lot of practise, Scottish munros are very regularly subject to | almost zero visibility where even the most advanced navigator | would have difficulty. Almost none of the receipients of this | advice actually want to navigate, they want to be able to follow | a route for duration of their journey. A task that is very simply | done with a phone if someone has been given the correct | instruction. | | When people have an appropriate route downloaded on their phone | to work offline ensuring they have enough charge and suitable | backup devices alongside told someone their route and expected | time of return they have covered most of the situations that get | people in trouble in terms of navigation. | | Instead they are routinely told to bring a map and compass by | people who generally seem to be enthusiastic volunteers who have | a deep interest specifically around navigation. | mro_name wrote: | > route downloaded on their phone to work offline | | I do it all the time and never met anybody else do it. Rather | everybody happily relies on online maps. | | Do you think widespread offline use is the case? | | I agree that to most map and compass are rather useless, but | still slightly more useful compared to a phone with drained | battery or no network coverage. | ghaff wrote: | >I do it all the time and never met anybody else do it. | Rather everybody happily relies on online maps. | | That's a good example of one way to reduce a pretty common | failure mode.Lack of cell phone service is probably a lot | more common than a dead phone especially if you carry a | backup external battery. (Outside of extreme conditions but | that's a separate matter.) | daleharvey wrote: | Specifically for Munros which is what I do network coverage | can be pretty bad and at least a few people I have talked to | have done the same as me and got caught out depending on the | internet then in future downloaded the route. The main | website everyone uses here has a .gpx for every walk (https:/ | /www.walkhighlands.co.uk/fortwilliam/buachailleetivem... for | example) | | I think drained batteries and no network coverages are | problems that can and should be addressed by advising people | properly. Instead I think some people end up over prepared | and most people go in with a map and a compass but still | completely underprepared. | jltsiren wrote: | > Navigating with a map and compass is a difficult skill that | takes a lot of practise | | That's a serious exaggeration. Navigating with a map and | compass was taught to 10-year-old kids in elementary school | when I was that age, and then it was practiced a few times | every year. Probably to ensure that men didn't waste too much | time learning basic skills in mandatory military service. | daleharvey wrote: | I wasn't talking about how to orient a map, I was speaking | about traversing mountains where being metres off route is | potentially fatal with little to no visibility. Saying that | is difficult is not exagerating. | withinboredom wrote: | Def learned this skill in the army. Still count my steps as a | habit. I can tell you how many kilometers I walk, and it is | usually almost what my watch says I walked. | | I'm still not sure which one is more correct. | ghaff wrote: | I dunno. | | >and suitable backup devices | | First of all, I wonder how many people actually have suitable | backup devices. | | Secondly, stuff does happen. There are a lot of circumstances | where a very simple compass and map--and knowledge that doesn't | require elite M&C navigation skills can be the difference | between "Um, I have no idea where I am and how to get home" and | "Damn, I guess I need to do this the old fashioned way." Yes, | there are conditions and locations where the "old fashioned | way" is really difficult to do. But often there are trails and | some visibility and you just need some basic ability to read a | map and know what direction you're headed in. | | Do I bother when I know an area and the weather is good? Nope. | But for anything more advanced, I carry a map and compass as | pretty cheap and easy insurance. | daleharvey wrote: | > First of all, I wonder how many people actually have | suitable backup devices. | | Virtually every group of people will have multiple backup | devices, for people going solo it something that should (but | isn't) recommended. | | > Secondly, stuff does happen. | | Stuff does and in every case if you want to follow a route | having a little dot that shows you exactly where you are in | relation to that route is better than having a map and | compass. I am not sure why you are replying to my point as if | it is not a choice for people to carry a phone with them but | somewhat makes the point. | | A properly prepared phone is a map and compass, it does | everything a map and compass can do and then adds an extra | useful feature of "and this is exactly where you are" | ghaff wrote: | I often hike by myself and, in general, try not to depend | on other people having things unless pre-arranged. | | I certainly use phone apps--including the Ordinance Survey | app in the UK, which is very good. But if I'm hiking in an | unfamiliar area, yes, I also do carry a map and compass | because that seems like a low cost and effort backup. I'm | absolutely not arguing _against_ using a smartphone app as | primary navigation. But I do also encourage having backup. | daleharvey wrote: | Yeh I often go solo and after a few experiences, | particularly if its unfamiliar, I try to make sure to | have a charged backup device with routes etc loaded. | | Similiarly I am not arguing against people using a map | and compass, but I think the current advice which is | entirely focused on map and compass with little guidance | for phone users (which if it exists, is always caveated) | has a lot more to do with outdoors peoples notions of | technological purity and less to do with public health | manicdee wrote: | What is the distinction between following a route and | navigating? | withinboredom wrote: | Navigating is looking and matching up landmarks to a map to | identify your current position, and then determining the | route you will follow. (Orientation) From there, you use a | compass to follow that route, counting your steps. You have | to know how many steps it takes you to walk a km/mile, then | you can reorient every so often to adjust your route based on | your real position. | | Just following a route is easy, in comparison. | qbasic_forever wrote: | Following a trail means you have some reference of a foot | path to stay on and follow. Navigating could mean anything-- | it might be reading a vague description like "follow the | trail to a cairn at mile 5, then bushwhack up hill 1500 | vertical feet to a ridge, follow the ridge as it ascends the | mountain choosing an obvious class 3 scramble on the east | side that avoids serious exposure (if you encounter class 5 | terrain you are off route)". With navigation you have to use | a lot more senses and tools and knowledge, the path isn't | immediately obvious. | nickjj wrote: | Independent of GPS I think people are built differently and can | understand 3D (first person) vs 2D (top down) worlds in different | ways. | | I know someone who can go anywhere once without GPS and recall | directions 10 years later even if they never drove near that area | again. It's like their memory can recall it the same as the first | time they went there. At the same time watching them type on a | keyboard is about the same as what it must have been like to | witness humans using basic tools for the first time. | | I've always been bad with driving directions, the idea of | navigating in 3D from the first person doesn't mesh with how I | think for recalling directions but if I look at a top down 2D map | and split things into a grid then it's not too bad. I only just | started using GPS the other week but I feel like it has helped me | retain information a lot better, I can visualize the route in my | mind and trace the turns with street names in a way that I could | never do before. | | Interestingly enough I don't think it's necessarily first person | vs top down on its own too. I've played a lot of FPS games in the | past with games that never had a top down map and I can still run | through them mentally like 15-20 years later. I don't know what | it is, it doesn't make sense to be tuned for navigating a virtual | world vs physical world but I do think GPS clicks some checkbox | in my brain that makes it be perceived as virtualized even though | it's mapping the physical world. | throwaway675309 wrote: | Well duh, there was a study on London cabbies who had to take a | test known as "the knowledge", and it was found that they had | significantly more growth in their hippocampus. | | So obviously the reverse would probably be true. | | I remember I used to chunk numbers in 3 to 4 digit groupings | because back in the day that was how I naturally memorized phone | numbers, successive generations probably can't rely on that | tactic as much simply because there's so little need to retain | the phone numbers in memory with the invention of smart phones. | extr wrote: | Very believable, I've noticed this effect myself. When I've moved | to a new area, if I use GPS exclusively to get around it takes me | months to learn the names of roads and do "route planning" in my | head. Versus very quickly, within a few days/weeks if I only | refer to GPS when legitimately lost or unsure. | | The thing is, why bother? I always have my phone. If I'm within a | few miles of my house, I can figure out where I'm going, but | maybe it takes me a little longer, and I don't come up with the | optimal route, and now I and have the risk of getting caught in | unexpected change in traffic patterns. If I'm somewhere | unfamiliar, spatial memory is irrelevant and I have to rely on it | regardless. | | Actually I feel like GPS makes me a better than navigator. Having | the "top down" view makes it feel like a video game, and that's | one area where I have a ton of practice looking at a 2D map, | relating it to 3D environment, and so on. | ghaff wrote: | >I always have my phone. | | Until you don't. It's probably a generational thing but I tend | to have non-electronic backups when it's relatively cheap and | easy to do so. And for relatively routine places I walk/drive, | I much prefer to have the route in my head. | noirbot wrote: | I think a lot of this ends up behind how you learn navigation. | I love GPS as a way to build up heuristics of how to get places | in a new city/from a new location. I find I mostly learn routes | by visual memory and not by street names/distances/number of | blocks. I know to turn at a specific building/business, and not | because it's 5th street or a specific train station. | | If you're someone who learns your routes in terms of | facts/numbers, then I can see GPS hurting your memory, but in | my case, the GPS won't tell me to turn at the Walmart, or get | off at the train station with the green tile. So after a few | GPS trips, I've learned the route in the way my brain will | remember. This especially helps when I don't know the traffic | patterns or alternate routes that a navigation app does. | | These days, for routes I don't know really well, or have high | traffic variance, I'll check GPS to verify a route, and then | use the route without using the app directly. | zitterbewegung wrote: | I only use gps to get places where I don't know where to go but | after that I stop using it . | | But this begs the question why is losing this is bad when we can | use our brains for something completely different or make peoples | jobs more productive | kuschku wrote: | I just use Google Maps as actual map, not as navigation. That | means I use it to find where I am, look at the roads, and look at | where I want to go, and plan the route on the map myself. | | This helps me to stay oriented when I'm not using a maps app as | well, because I already know which roads intersect with which, | where, and how to take them to get from A to B. | | Sadly, Google Maps does everything they can to prevent you from | doing this, e.g. not showing street names at all unless you zoom | in to ridiculous levels (and often not even then) as well as not | showing you which roads are one-way, which roads allow bicycles, | etc. | | That's why I mostly rely on Open Street Map and similar actual | maps. | | Also, if I've got additional time to get somewhere, I'll get lost | on purpose, taking roads I don't know yet, then looking at the | maps to figure out where I am (which is super useful to discover | hidden paths and shortcuts). ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-14 23:00 UTC)