[HN Gopher] On a road to Prizren with a Free Software Phone ___________________________________________________________________ On a road to Prizren with a Free Software Phone Author : pabs3 Score : 131 points Date : 2022-08-13 07:46 UTC (2 days ago) (HTM) web link (honk.sigxcpu.org) (TXT) w3m dump (honk.sigxcpu.org) | goodpoint wrote: | This comment section has a bunch of people whining that Free | Software phones developed by mostly *unpaid volunteers* are not | good enough. | | Also, nobody gifted me a pony today. | user764743 wrote: | If only people could get the phone they pre-ordered. The | /r/purism subreddit is so much filled with horror stories and | dishonest marketing practices by the company that I decided | against ordering one. | jstanley wrote: | I received my Librem 5. I wrote a short review[0] when I first | got it. | | Since then it has developed a fault whereby the phone crashes | immediately as soon as I switch the wifi kill-switch on. Just | instant black screen, nothing happening. Sometimes I have to | take the battery out to get it to boot back up. I just don't | use wifi. Apart from that it still works great. | | [0] https://incoherency.co.uk/blog/stories/librem5-first- | impress... | TylerE wrote: | But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? | piethesailorman wrote: | I see much of this on the subreddit as well. Though maybe I can | be a point of anecdata to the opposite side. I ordered(Librem 5 | USA) in December 21, got my phone in July 22. Had some small | issues, emailed customer support, got helpful responses. The | phone calls and texts fine. There are good apps, a good | community, etc. I think there is a loud minority of people that | didn't quite understand what they were buying into. A small | company and a first product.. you're really speculating by | being early. This is not going to be remotely close to the same | experience as buying a device with +20y of development from a | top 5 most traded public companies in the U.S.. I bought the | phone with the understanding, maybe I get the phone in 2022, | maybe I don't. Maybe I get the phone and it can't make | calls/texts because of a software issue and I'll have to wait | for a fix or aid in development.. I would recommend the phone | to others who share similar expectations. Though I would | recommend the USA version as they seem to be available. It | seems those still waiting for phones might be stuck waiting for | the chinese model.(chip shortage related? Idk) | monopoliessuck wrote: | I was a super early pre-order and then waited years for | SOMETHING. I eventually asked for a refund which they said | they'd honor. I've now been in the refund "queue" for over a | year or two. I've lost count of the exact number of years, | promises and emails at this point. | | I understand growing pains, but purism is neither a transparent | nor a trustworthy company. Buy a PinePhone Pro and call it a | day. It's still not ready for prime time as a daily driver, | IMO, but the company is a breath of fresh air in comparison. | piethesailorman wrote: | This is a bummer. Did you order the USA model or the Chinese | model? | monopoliessuck wrote: | The US model didn't exist even as a concept at the time I | pre-ordered. I ordered before the first lot, but picked | Evergreen because I wanted it to work and I didn't mind | funding and waiting, but this is crazy. | | I realize there's a valid difference between place of | origin, but for me sitting here empty handed, the US model | just seemed like a way to upcharge for a product that | hardly existed in any form. | | Chinese? American? Whatever, for me vapor is vapor no | matter where it's supposed to be coming from "eventually". | caboteria wrote: | When I asked for a refund I was told that they had changed | their mind and they were no longer honoring their original | policies. I have the phone now and it's pretty much a | paperweight. Someday I might want to play around with it but | at the moment it's more of a toy and less of a phone. | emptyparadise wrote: | Very nice, looks like these open phones are moving forward. Would | love to have a new Nokia N900. | HidyBush wrote: | We still don't have a free software feature phone that has the | same polish as bottom of the barrel flip phones from 20 years | ago. I have a PinePhone and I'm seriously asking myself how much | time it will take to get an experience remotely comparable with | even the first iPhone, both in terms of ease of use and features. | I believe people are rushing down this road with no real vision | of what such a device needs to feel useable. I am planning to | start developing something for the PinePhone in foreseeable the | future, but just the difficulty in retrieving resources about | understanding how the Linux kernel is patched to run on that ARM | board, the necessary drivers and how all the various sensors and | interfaces communicate really lets me down | megous wrote: | It all mostly uses standard Linux interfaces. IIO for most | sensors, V4L2 for camera, AT interface for modem, ALSA for | codec audio controls, I2C to talk with accessories, USB | configfs to configure USB gadgets,... | | I struggle to recall something that's purely Pinephone specific | from the userspace perspective. I tried almost all the lowest | level Linux HW interfaces usable on Pinephone. | wiz21c wrote: | >>> just the difficulty in retrieving resources about | understanding how the Linux kernel is patched to run on that | ARM board, the necessary drivers and how all the various | sensors and interfaces communicate really lets me down | | maybe you could give it a try and document your trip ? As | someone who'd love to help the cause, but who doesn't have much | time, a good documentation would help. | longrod wrote: | It took Linux desktop some 20 years to reach the point where you | could _just_ use it i.e., no tinkering needed, everything works | by default, you install the software you need and that 's it. | It's not perfect even now but it's much better. I rarely have to | pop into the terminal to tinker with a system config file now. | | We don't have 20 years to wait when it comes to free software | phones. The problem is that phones are not meant to be hacked | upon. They are meant to be used. Sure, it may feel nice to tinker | and stuff but everything should _just_ work before you can even | consider it a daily driver. | | I haven't personally used Librem or Pinephone so I don't know how | far along they are in terms of user experience (not developer | experience). | eitland wrote: | Linux has worked much better out of the box than Windows for a | number of applications since at least a 2006. | | Don't confuse Windows, - slipstreamed and supported by a | competent IT department - with what a user gets out of the box | from an OEM. | | Please note: | | I have supported users on Windows from 1995 to somewhere after | 2012 (a little bit blurry). | | Just saying "you don't know what you are talking about" won't | cut it. | BoorishBears wrote: | You _can 't_ know what you are talking about? | | Your experience supporting Windows users isn't all | encompassing, you defined no criteria whatsoever for "better | out of the box", you didn't define any of the applications... | the list goes on. | | Take ease of install. I assure you in 2006 Linux was not as | easy to install as it is today when it comes to things like | having working power management. Even something as basic as | having a computer successfully go to sleep and come back with | working wifi was often a challenge. | | Or take gaming. Today Wine/Proton have come leaps and bounds | and Linux still ends up excluded from some of the largest | gaming titles out there. | | Or making a simple word document that renders the same way on | Window user's PCs as it does on yours. I was one of those | people trying to force OpenOffice/LibreOffice and there was | nothing more fun than chasing down weird issues when a | Windows user using one of the most popular word editors on | earth couldn't properly render your document... | | The reality is Windows won on desktop, and a very small | minority of people still want to dump on Windows. For all its | warts, it's clearly made the tradeoffs that benefit the | largest number of desktop users. | cowtools wrote: | >Today Wine/Proton have come leaps and bounds and Linux | still ends up excluded from some of the largest gaming | titles out there. | | It is due to anti-cheat. Whose fault is that? The | developers refuse to support linux even if we meet them | halfway. | | >The reality is Windows won on desktop, and a very small | minority of people still want to dump on Windows. For all | its warts, it's clearly made the tradeoffs that benefit the | largest number of desktop users. | | Windows "won" because it was there first and it's stayed | there due to its anti-competitive behavior (see halloween | documents, windows refund day, etc.). You would be hard- | pressed to buy a laptop or something without paying for | microsoft's license- they have deals with all the | manufacturers to stop competition before it even happens. | | Microsoft is sitting on top of a massive cash cow. They | will continue to plunder their user-base with ads and | spyware, and they will continue neglect their | responsibilities as a custodian to the extent that it | improves their numbers in some board-room meeting. The | "value-offering" of windows will get so bad that users | might switch to linux/wine or reactOS. They might not | switch now, but here's the way I see it: linux will only | improve and windows will only get worse. It's not over | until the fat lady sings. | BoorishBears wrote: | > It is due to anti-cheat. Whose fault is that? The | developers refuse to support linux even if we meet them | halfway. | | Windows meets them all the way. Not having to deal with | LSB, Glibc, different distros, etc. | | > Windows "won" because it was there first and it's | stayed there due to its anti-competitive behavior | | Why does every pro-Linux statement devolve into an anti- | Windows statement the moment it meets resistance. | | If Linux is truly "better" for whatever useful meaning of | that word there is, I cannot for the life of me | understand why the invariant that Linux cannot actually | be promoted on the desktop without tearing down Windows | to do so. | cowtools wrote: | >Windows meets them all the way. Not having to deal with | LSB, Glibc, different distros, etc. | | Windows doesn't do shit besides stand there. | | >Why does every pro-Linux statement devolve into an anti- | Windows statement the moment it meets resistance. | | I'm not sure what you mean by this. Imagine I build a | robot that does your job faster than you, better than | you, more reliably than you, and I distribute it for | free. One small issue though: it only speaks French. Are | you really going to suggest that in a sane market, you | would stand a chance against this robot? | | You have to conclude that a market in which windows | defeats linux is irrational. If windows did not wield | its' reverse compatibility and did not have anti- | competitive dealings with manufacturers, it would just be | another corpse in the pile of defeated unixes (solaris, | etc.). | | Microsoft has a unique market position due to its | business relationships. That's no attribute of the | windows operating system, and it is an advantage that can | slowly erode over time. My problem is that you're | asserting that there's some characteristic of the windows | operating system that is superior. Reverse-compatibility | is a anti-feature, It's just not obvious in the short- | term. | BoorishBears wrote: | > Are you really going to suggest that in a sane market, | you would stand a chance against this robot? | | Yes! Because if no one speaks French, and it's not so | much better that _people are suddenly willing to learn | French_ , then no one will want to use it! | | And Linux is not some vision of perfection either, there | are still warts around the quality and polish of | userspace applications compared to Windows, so meeting | the incredibly high bar of "throw out your entire method | of thinking for this" is nearly impossible. | | You've just perfectly summed up why "the year of the | Linux Desktop" has been coming up for nearly 2 decades | now. | stonogo wrote: | My experience with installing Windows in 2006 was being | presented with a 1-800 number I had to call, so that I | could read off a massive hex string and type in an endless | series of call-and-response codes. That was AFTER having to | dig out a floppy drive -- in 2006 -- because Microsoft | couldn't be bothered to update their installation media | with SATA drivers. | | Once that was done I was faced with a nearly-driverless | machine, followed by several hours of shuttling .msi files | in via USB drive (including a four hundred megabyte printer | driver?!), capped off with a four- to six-hour Windows | Update marathon, during which my computer rebooted at | random. | | Installing Windows was what made me investigate Linux in | the first place. Since then I have found peace with Apple | products, but I seriously think you're looking at Windows | of old with some rose-tinted glasses. | rascul wrote: | > It took Linux desktop some 20 years to reach the point where | you could just use it i.e., no tinkering needed, everything | works by default, you install the software you need and that's | it. | | Only took about 5 years for me. And that's probably only | because I didn't know about it until '96. | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | I have not used Librem, but I own a Pinephone. Anecdotally, | while the initial impression of community edition was not great | ( I personally blame ubuntu as default OS ), I eventually tried | PostmarketOS ( on HN recommendation actually ) and I am now | going through side by side testing with my work phone as a | backup. | | For basic stuff ( phone, text, light net use ) it works. It is | not polished. It is very much underpowered.. but there is | something to be said for having that level of control over a | machine. I think I agree with you; it will take take time the | same way it did with desktop linux. Still, I am more optimistic | now.. we are starting to have real options outside of the | duopoly forced down humanity's throats. | | And.. even if you are not ready to jump onto new hardware, you | can install Kali linux in Android now[1]. | | [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxOGyuGq0Ts | squarefoot wrote: | > you can install Kali linux in Android now | | This solves some problems (running Linux UI and apps) but | leaves some very important others unaddressed (security). The | point isn't just installing Linux but also removing from | devices every piece of non free -as in not open, therefore | non auditable and by extension not trustworthy- piece of | firmware/OS/software. The hardest part is achieving that goal | and many initiatives are struggling to get as close as | possible to that point. As a Linux guy, I would love being | able to turn a spyware ridden phone into a 100% open Linux | platform, but if someone said like that it can be done, but | they're using *BSD, or Haiku, or whatewer 100% open OS out | there, that would be great anyway. | stuaxo wrote: | Naming is always funny, not sure I would have chosen a project | name so close to "Prison" | tildef wrote: | I don't think Prizren is part of any project name--it just | happened to be where DebConf was hosted this year. Unless | you're referring to Purism. | ardit33 wrote: | Anybody reading this, Prizren is a very beautiful historical | town/city. It has some really nice old architecture, plus a | castle, and there is plenty to explore around the area. It has a | lot of old school Albanian gold and silver shops, that do some | really interesting/old style jewelry, as back in the Ottoman era | used to be an important stop for merchants. | throwaway81523 wrote: | Phone is a Librem 5 in case that was what you wanted to know. | wiz21c wrote: | Just checked the price : 1299$ ouch, that's really expensive... | TylerE wrote: | Especially for performance inline with a low-end Android a | carrier will give you for free. | shepherdjerred wrote: | How much harder is it to own one of these phones vs an iPhone? I | loved hacking on my smartphone when I was in high school, but now | I'd like something that just works (or at least requires only a | small amount of effort). | | I'd really like a barebones phone that has only the bare | essentials, ideally not even a web browser. | em-bee wrote: | it really depends on how you use it. i had non-android phones | before. (even openmoko). calling, sms, taking notes. those | phones had less apps, but they worked. so the question of "how | much harder" is really a question of "what apps to you need". | today i am on android (/e/) because there are a few android | apps that are absolutely essential for me now. but if i didn't | need those specific apps, then any other system would be just | fine. | woodrowbarlow wrote: | if free software is not your motivator, consider the light | phone 2. it's a b&w e-ink phone that does 4g LTE | calls/sms/hotspot, with apps for gps navigation and podcasts. | fossuser wrote: | The Punkt also has Signal: | https://www.punkt.ch/en/products/mp02-4g-mobile-phone/ | | I think these are neat, but have an iPhone 13 Mini because | it's hard to beat Apple's quality and privacy work. | flipnotic wrote: | I'm building a barebones phone like you describe, and am | looking for feedback from people. Mind if I get in contact? | chrisseaton wrote: | People used to say they wanted a phone that just did the basics | - calling, SMS. The thing is... are those the basics now? I | almost never make phone calls and I think I've literally never | sent an SMS on my current phone. The basics now are the apps - | Signal, WhatsApp, Twitter and Instagram DMs, etc. I think | that's typical for most people? | sethhochberg wrote: | They're probably not defined as basics based on how | frequently people use them compared to apps, but, phone and | SMS are still the lowest common denominator. | | I've been dealing with the police recently after a minor | burglary. That involved both making and receiving phone | calls. | | My dentist has an automated system that texts to confirm | appointments. | | Despite its downsides, SMS-based 2FA is ubiquitous and you | don't always have ability to opt into something more secure. | | I'd expect most people elect to use apps for communication | when they've got an option, but there are tons of scenarios | in modern life where you really don't have the option. | at-fates-hands wrote: | I think it could be a generational thing. | | My nephew who's 26, runs a pool company. He said he barely | makes any phone calls and most of his appointments and | interactions with clients and friends are all mainly done | through texting. The only social media he uses is Instagram. | | My daughter is 15. She still uses the phone extensively for | conferencing her friends when playing online games. She's | uses the iphone Facetime extensively as well if she's not | playing online games. Most of her friends do little texting | and actually do call each other much more frequently and for | much longer periods of time. Not unusual for her to be on the | phone with one of her online buddies living in Florida for a | few hours. Their conversations frequently revolve around | videos they share or shows they're watching. They all have | Apple devices and I've been surprised at the multiple | different ways they're utilizing the phone feature on their | devices in ways I never imagined. | | Now me? I'm in my early 40's, my parents are their 70's and | they're using the texting feature a lot more nowadays. My Mom | and Dad both still prefer to use the phone, but my Dad's | hearing is starting to become an issue, so texting allows him | to have really good conversations without fear of losing out | on anything. Myself, I still use the phone quite a bit, | texting seems to to be tapering off in favor of email and | phone calls with my friends and freelance clients which I | never thought would happen. | | I really thought the same thing, that the phone part of your | device was quickly becoming obsolete. I've been surprised | with my daughter's generation who are finding new ways to | utilize the feature and combine with the other things her and | friends love most - online gaming, sharing videos, sharing | and discussing their favorite topics of conversation. | piperswe wrote: | IMO Facetime is closer to being an app feature than being a | phone feature - it isn't standardized, interoperable, or | omnipresent the way phone calls and SMS are | aquaduck wrote: | It seems that different people have vastly different use | cases for phones. | | I don't use any of those apps, and if I did, I'd prefer a | larger screen and physical keyboard. My phone is for calling, | SMS, navigation, and notifying me of new emails (never for | actually replying though!). ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-15 23:01 UTC)