[HN Gopher] MacBook Air M1 screen crack for no apparent reason ___________________________________________________________________ MacBook Air M1 screen crack for no apparent reason Author : lewisl9029 Score : 275 points Date : 2022-08-15 20:16 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (origin-discussions2-us-dr-prz.apple.com) (TXT) w3m dump (origin-discussions2-us-dr-prz.apple.com) | sackerhews wrote: | My friends iPhone got _replaced_ 3 times, every single time the | same fault. Something to do with audio interface going missing | and mic not working. | | His next phone was an Android. | | I remember looking it up and there were rumours that Apple had | initially acknowledged this fault and replaced them with no | questions asked but then withdrawn the memo. | londons_explore wrote: | Many faults like this are caused by some behaviour of your | friend that none of Apples internal testers did. | | For example, maybe your friend used a specific app that no | tester every used. | | I remember once a big company doing an emergency product recall | because they hadn't tested putting the product in fleece lined | pockets. If you put it in fleece lined pockets, it wouldn't | boot anymore due to the static discharge of the fleece rubbing | on the plastic surface as you walked around. | | Yet they had 1000+ beta testers, yet were somehow unlucky that | not a single one used fleece lined pockets! | estiven2006 wrote: | [deleted] | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | _> Page 49 of 49_ | | That tells you something... | | Cupertino, we have a problem. | sam1r wrote: | I was shocked when I saw there was _49_ pages. Remember, the m1 | is just a few years old! | happyopossum wrote: | A lot of the 'me too' responses are about other MacBooks - | not just the m1 air. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | I don't think this has anything to do with the M1 chip. I | think the case may be a bit too tight, and flexes when it | cools, and that is enough to cause the crack. | flak48 wrote: | M1 = "the 1st gen MacBook Air with the M1 chip" | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | Yes, I know, but I don't think the chip is the reason for | the cracking. I think it may be tolerances in the case. | | Maybe they also started using a different, more brittle | glass, with this generation. Maybe the stress has always | been there, but didn't cause cracks, with the last type | of glass. | flipdot wrote: | You missed the point. Nobody's saying chip is the | culprit--"M1" in this context refers to the Macbook | series powered by the eponymous chip. Which means those | Macbooks are only a few years old at most, yet there are | 49 pages of user reports that their screens are prone to | cracking for no reason. | happyopossum wrote: | No, there are 49 pages of complaints, but many of them | are about other MacBooks. | fcoury wrote: | Whoa, I read it as 49 of 49 _replies_ and thought: it might be | a problem but doesn 't seem to be widespread. Now as an owner | of a M1 myself, I am really worried. | vletal wrote: | Maybe internally, but we have to remember how long it took them | to return back to the old keyboards without ever acknowledging | it was a horrible mistake. | ortusdux wrote: | It's things like this that make Framework laptops sound more and | more appealing. An OEM replacement screen is $180 and swaps out | in minutes. | opan wrote: | If only they had high-end ARM chips as an option. | asdff wrote: | The current macbook air body is pretty poor. I had one of the | late intel ones for a spell before overheating killed the logic | board, and it developed an outline of the keyboard on the screen | within a few months just from the clamshell being closed daily. I | wasn't even carrying this thing in a bag, it just sat on a desk. | Hamuko wrote: | > _The current macbook air body is pretty poor._ | | > _I had one of the late intel ones_ | | The current or the previous? | happyopossum wrote: | > I had one of the late intel ones | | They've redesigned the MBA since then - | https://www.apple.com/macbook-air-m2/ | giancarlostoro wrote: | Dear Apple, | | Its okay to not have to make your laptops ultra skinny if it | means you avoid these sort of issues. | | Sincerely, A customer waiting to buy a decent laptop that is | sturdy and comfortable to type on. | [deleted] | alerighi wrote: | Then don't buy an Apple laptop, simple. Buy a Thinkpad that is | almost indestructible and you don't have these kind of | problems, or as I did a Dell XPS 15 (though I can't talk about | how solid it is, since I have it only since 2 months). | | Surely I would prefer Dell for the support, I have 1 year of | premium assistance (if there is a fault a technician will come | where I am to make the repair, I don't have to bring it to a | store that takes days to do the repair on a computer that I | need for my job) and with like 20$ more I got the coverage even | for accidental damage. | | Apple doesn't have correct policy, first it doesn't recognize | in warranty faults that should, and secondly repairs outside | the warranty period cost more than buying a new computer, and | it doesn't sell spare parts to others that are not Apple | authorized repair center (that needs to apply the policy of | Apple otherwise they will not send the spare parts): something | called mafia. | deanCommie wrote: | Dear Giancarlo, | | Please buy a MacBook Pro - the new M1 and M2 models are nice, | thick, sturdy, comfortable, fast, and have a beast of a | battery. | | The Macbook Air line is specifically for the non-Pro consumer | who values portability and size over everything else. | | Sincerely, Anyone that can Google this. | 0000011111 wrote: | I think the keyboards are sub par on the pro and Air models. | samatman wrote: | The keyboard on the 16" M1 is my favorite laptop keyboard | Apple has manufactured, of the ones I've used. | | Which is all types, and the majority of models, they've | produced since the aluminum 12" G4 Powerbook. YMMV. | noodlesUK wrote: | Further PSA: don't buy the m1/m2 MBPs. It's a weird machine | now that the m1 pro/max MBPs are out, and the m2 air with its | redesign is also out. Get one of those instead | buzzy_hacker wrote: | Dear Commie, | | A user in the same thread reports the issue for a MacBook | Pro: https://origin-discussions2-us-dr- | prz.apple.com/thread/25279... | | Sincerely, Anyone that can read the linked page | LeifCarrotson wrote: | Thick? Sturdy? They're 15mm/0.61 inches thick. Most of that | is used up by the base, the screen is a terrifyingly flimsy | 3.6mm thin. | | Comfortable? The key travel is 1mm. I'd hardly call that | comfortable, that's a concession to thin-ness. | | And they're not that fast just looking at power specs - the | new processors are impressively efficient, but if they | prioritized professional performance and effective heat | dissipation over being skinny, just imagine what that | efficient processor could do with 70% more power | dissipation/heat removal. | | Also, "fast" and "beast of a battery" may be true for now, | but in a few years, when memory and storage are cheaper and | faster, you won't be able to update, and when your battery | starts to degrade you won't be able to click in a new one. | Again, because long-term performance, upgradeability, and | repairability have been sacrificed for the sake of thin. | kitsunesoba wrote: | I can see the merit in offering a "workstation" model that | throws noise and heat out the window in favor of power, but | as a native mobile dev who's compiling all day I think the | 14"/16" models make the right tradeoffs for the | overwhelming majority. | | No, my company provided work M1 Pro 16" isn't going to beat | my 5950X custom built tower or some of the high end Ryzen | 6000 series laptops, but that's fine. It's still very fast | and responsive while being inaudible 99% of the time, never | hitting lap scorching temperatures, and having battery life | measured in double digits. | | I suspect that an unwieldy, hot, loud desktop replacement | M-series machine would be very niche. | samatman wrote: | You don't have to imagine, the same processors are | available in the Mini line and direct comparisons have been | made in detail. | | tl;dr if you have a use case where it's a significant | difference you already know that. | closewith wrote: | I love the drive towards lighter and thinner laptops. Long may | it last. | Mo3 wrote: | So, on the topic of sturdy.... I have the Macbook Air M1, | bought it pretty much directly after it came out, and it is | sturdy as _shit_. | | Just to iterate on the kind of abuse mine has already endured - | without even the slightest dent or crack: | | 1) I put the Macbook on a chair and, without thinking, put a | blanket over it while cleaning, causing my girlfriend to sit on | it with her full weight for over 2 hours | | 2) I have dropped the laptop two times while carrying it | | 3) The laptop has fallen off my desk also two times because of | the lack of Magsafe | | 4) The laptop was, in its silicone case, in the passenger seat | in a 25-30mph car crash, got shot full force against the middle | console | | Not a single dent. Just some scratches on one edge from the car | crash. | shpongled wrote: | I've also dropped mine several times (it did get a _minor_ | chip), beat it up a bit (despite trying to be careful), and | even spilled water on it... liquid got behind a good 25% of | the screen and I thought I would have to just suck it up and | repair it, but it just evaporated /resolved itself after a | couple of weeks. | | Pleasantly surprised so far - knock on wood. | Mo3 wrote: | Yup, forgot about that. I also spilled a glass of water | over the keyboard, although not behind the screen like you. | Evaporated after a while by itself... very, very happy with | this laptop. | conductr wrote: | I've had my M2 MBA for a few weeks now and it just feels | flimsy. I am not surprised this is happening at all. I used the | MBA'2013 for all these years and never once did I think it was | heavy/thick. The aluminum shell it was in felt solid, this one | feels like it's as thick as a coke can. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | I just got mine, but I disagree about feeling flimsy. The | metal doesn't feel as thick as a MBP but I don't think I | could bend it while it's closed. | | I recommend taking a trip to best buy and feeling around the | windows models on display to inspire more confidence in your | new MBA :) | conductr wrote: | So slightly better than garbage is your barometer for | quality? | | I can easily contort/bend the frame with my hand if I | wanted to. I'd have no confidence in this thing actually | being on the go (in and out of bags). Even just a fall from | the couch could RIP this thing is how it feels anyways. I | could be wrong of course. But, I do feel that this vs | quality is at odds and this one has stepped into the other | end. I hope I'm wrong of course as I have never had to deal | with getting an Apple product repaired and the whole idea | of it is foreign to me (again, 2013 is my last purchase | other than phones and since then I read about all the | issues with keyboards, etc and it seems like they just | don't give a damn anymore). | amelius wrote: | > A customer waiting to buy a decent laptop that is sturdy and | comfortable to type on. | | Dear Apple, your keyboard looks like an almost perfect | arrangement of squares. The only problem is that it's not | ergonomic. Humans prefer keys that are not flat, but slightly | concave, for a more organic feel (for example). Style over | function/ergonomics is not going to win me over. | z9znz wrote: | This is obviously a serious issue, perhaps with manufacturing or | a batch or two in the supply chain. | | Thankfully my M1 Air has been fine (aside from one fully dead | pixel from day one), and it has traveled around the world with | me. | | Apple should take responsibility for this, but for this current | risk and possible owner-fault risks, I do find AppleCare+ worth | it. There's almost no repair that can be done which would cost | less than the plus warranty costs, so it's a no-brainer as far as | I'm concerned. | alliao wrote: | I'm such a fanboy for Panasonic Let's Note, look it up I don't | mind it if Apple made one for slightly heavier duty | scrlk wrote: | Glad to see other Let's Note fans out there! | | I'm a big fan of the SV Let's Note line - they are the last of | the "no compromises" style of ultraportables. | | > 12.1" 16:10 1920x1200 display | | > 1.1 kg | | > Blu-ray drive | | > WLAN support | | > Thunderbolt (USB-C), USB-A, Ethernet and VGA | | > Removable battery | | > Hardware wireless switch | | > Activity/status LEDs | | Downsides: odd circular trackpad, Japan only, extremely | expensive. | | Last time Apple made anything like this was the 12" PowerBook | G4. | scottydelta wrote: | Apple has always tried to blame customers whenever they can. | | I remember when my MacBook pro 2015 started glitching and Apple | voided the warranty by saying there was liquid spillage/fluid | damage. | | So apparently macbooks have these small stickers inside them | which change color upon contact with liquids to help detect | liquid damage but the issue with those stickers are that they | also change color if you live in a humid area. | | They made me pay for that repair even though the customer support | guy at the store agreed that the color could change because of | humidity but it was company policy to charge for those repairs. | [deleted] | wnevets wrote: | > Apple has always tried to blame customers whenever they can. | | Jobs on iPhone 4 antenna: "avoid holding it in this way" | r00fus wrote: | I know there was a class action in late 00s for that where I | was compensated because I had a similar interaction with an | Apple Store genius. I was of the understanding they changed | their "liquid damage" policy due to that lawsuit. | eecc wrote: | Heh, the punk at the Amsterdam Apple Store had the audacity to | guilt trip me for a complaint I had within the mandatory EU | warranty. | | According to him, I had exposed an iPhone to excessive humidity | despite the sensing sticker remaining white. His reasoning was | that if the connector was growing copper corrosion it must have | been humidity and therefore my fault (not a bad batch of | connectors.) | | I chuckled and asked him how could that happen if I always keep | the thing in my pocket and he said "well that's a humid | environment and the phone is not designed for that." | | The fact that he also called a security guy before lecturing me | about my warranty expiry was a clear indication of the sort of | narrative and treatment I'd receive if I insisted, so I walked. | Other times I was given red-carpet treatment and expensive | replacements without a peep. | | I guess it really depends on whether Cupertino acknowledges the | defect, until then Genius KPIs must include how many customers | they successfully subdue and kick out. | | SMH... but I guess you get assholes everywhere | enqk wrote: | I've witnessed an interaction like this in the main Apple | store in Berlin, where a woman came (with a friend) because | she had an issue with having forgotten her password and | wanting to get her photos back, which wasn't possible. The | security guard was extremely fast to show up behind her back | as soon as despair could be heard in her voice. | | That gave me a very different image of Apple all of sudden.. | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote: | >I chuckled and asked him how could that happen if I always | keep the thing in my pocket and he said "well that's a humid | environment and the phone is not designed for that." | | Lol. | amelius wrote: | Reminiscent of "you're holding it wrong". | mnd999 wrote: | Yep, it took them a very long time to admit that the GPU | problems on my Core 2 Duo were a design problem. | mr_toad wrote: | Condensation can damage electrical equipment quite easily. | Bring a cold metal laptop into a humid environment at your own | risk. | MichaelCollins wrote: | Several years ago I brought my Macbook Air to an Apple store to | get the battery replaced under warranty. The computer worked | fine otherwise, it needed a new battery. | | The 'genius' came back with my laptop after a few minutes | saying it had water damage and trying to pitch me on a new | laptop. After I refused and started insisting that the battery | was under warranty he eventually relented and acted like he was | doing me a favor to give me the new battery I was entitled to. | Then when he finally came back with my newly batteried laptop, | he mentioned my android smartphone and started trying to sell | me an iphone. I'm never buying a computer from Apple again, it | was a terrible experience. | | Assuming he wasn't lying about the water indicators being | tripped (he may well have been, for all I know), the only way I | can think that would have happened is from the humidity in the | air. I never dropped any drink on the laptop, never used it in | the bathtub or anything like that. I don't believe it was ever | in contact with liquid water at all, only water vapor. | ghaff wrote: | On the other hand, there were some screen issues on 2015 | MacBook Pro laptops that I ended up experiencing. I | inadvertently found out that they had extended the warranty | well outside the usual period and fixed it for free. The only | comment from the "genius" was it was one of the more | interesting patterns he'd seen. | | Apple's certainly far from perfect but I've been pretty happy | with their customer service. | kurupt213 wrote: | He was being helpful by directing you towards an iPhone. They | want you to have the best UX. | radicaldreamer wrote: | That's a strange experience because I thought Apple Store | employees weren't paid on commission. | scottydelta wrote: | They are not but they are encouraged to up sell. | | They tried to sell me a new MacBook by suggesting that I | trade this one in to get a small credit. I would rather use | that macbook as a paper weight than to give it back to | Apple so that they can sell it to some poor guy. | wolpoli wrote: | I suspect there are some differences between regions. The | staffs in the Apple Store in Macau are more aggressive | than the staffs in Canada, in my experience. | scottydelta wrote: | It was the same case with my MacBook. No water damage but the | liquid damage indicator had tripped somehow. I was forced to | pay for repairs. | wizofaus wrote: | A warranty that can be voided just because some little sticker | a user can't access indicates moisture detection doesn't even | sound like it should be legal. If you've done something | obviously stupid like drop your monitor in the bath then you're | hardly going to need such a sticker to detect "unreasonable | use". It seems pretty reasonable to expect consumer goods to | tolerate small amounts of moisture. In fact a monitor I just | bought recently got water on it due to some dripping house | plants above it. It was fine. So far anyway! | eastbound wrote: | Most electronics including Apple mention that they're rated | for 35degC while working and 40degC while off. | | After a single year, most of Apple warranties void out. | geraldwhen wrote: | You use your laptop outside a lot? | notsapiensatall wrote: | Of course, portability is the point of a laptop. Absent | precipitation, I'd rather use one in a park than indoors. | LtWorf wrote: | So if you live in a place where it will reach 41deg in the | summer, you won't have warranty! Neat! | | Also those seem very cool temperatures given how apple | computers love to overheat. | LtWorf wrote: | Apple seem to love to claim liquid damage | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2r-g8EaTfY | | He has more videos about it. | | Apparently they trigger very easily with humidity. | amelius wrote: | Why aren't these things waterproof anyway? | Nextgrid wrote: | Those liquid damage indicators might need to be made illegal | - water damage that would cause the machine to fail is | readily visible without any stickers, and if it isn't visible | then the machine is likely to work just fine. | ajb wrote: | Maybe this is an urban legend, but: | | Sinclair Research made early home computers, well known in the | UK, not so much elsewhere. These were tricky to set up, and | often returned as broken. To cut their support costs, | supposedly Sinclair, on first receipt of a 'broken' computer | would simply add a sticker and send it back, 'repaired'. Often | the customer would get it working on this second attempt. Only | when a computer was sent in with this sticker already applied, | would they actually investigate to see if anything was wrong | with it. | alliao wrote: | if 80% of cases were due to improper connection or EBKAC then | this would actually be quite an elegant solution...... | linker3000 wrote: | Back in the days of the Toshiba laptops with the orange | plasma screens (T3100 and T3200), a small batch had out of | spec panels that were thicker than the right ones. These | panels were under more tension in the bezel and had a | tendency to shatter. | | I worked for a Toshiba dealer/repair centre and the first we | knew about the problem was when a Tosh came back with a | screen that looked like it had taken a bullet. The owner | swore that the screen just went 'bang'. The crazy thing was | that it still worked! | | We checked with Toshiba and they basically said 'Yep, replace | it' and so it began. | | We didn't see a lot of these screens, but it was a notable | problem. | briane80 wrote: | Also there was a famous media interview by clive sinclair | telling customers they could fix an issue with the a ram pack | upgrade falling off with the use of blu tac | ValentineC wrote: | > _Apple has always tried to blame customers whenever they | can._ | | +1 to this. | | Apple has never admitted fault for their shoddy MagSafe 2 | charger (and older Lightning) cable insulation, many of which | have ended up disintegrating and spewing blue stuff all over my | furniture. | | I've had multiple cables flake over the years, and every time I | bring one of the chargers to a Genius bar (so far: Australia, | Japan, and Singapore), they've always fallen back to "policy" | and blamed it on me for not taking care of it properly. | ghaff wrote: | I had a MagSafe charger that the cable basically | disintegrated on me and no amount of epoxy and electrical | tape would keep it together.. Not good. On the other hand a | new charger is a lot cheaper than having to replace the | computer. | HideousKojima wrote: | Apple doesn't want to do proper strain relief on their cables | because it's ugly and unaesthetic. Apple has basically always | prioritized form over function. | geoffeg wrote: | Apple wasn't _always_ like that, just the current iteration | of Apple. Back in the 80s and 90s Apple was more focused on | longevity and building really great user interfaces than | purity of design. Their Human Interface Guidelines were | some of the best in the industry and they spent a lot of | time and money on human factors research. | juve1996 wrote: | and apple almost went bankrupt after that. | kevinmchugh wrote: | Someone here pointed out to me, when I made a similar | comment, the hockey puck mouse. | | I think the Apple III is also an example of their | susceptibility to letting aesthetics or marketing dictate | over function | jeromegv wrote: | I feel people often have pink glasses over the old period | of Apple. 90s was tons of Mac product lines competing | with each other. No shortage of quality problem on those | hardware. A nice operating system but was falling behind | in many modern OS concepts (while trying to build a new | OS from scratch and failing). | | I used apple all my life (including the 90s) and it was | definitely not the best period of apple. | oblib wrote: | Yeah, I burned through a few new Macs in late 90s early | 2000s. They all were obsoleted pretty fast. I have an old | Silver Door Mac G4 that was really just crap new out of | the box. | | But, the Late `09 Mac Mini I bought new has been as solid | as one could ever hope for. I just ordered a refurbished | late `14 Mac Mini from OWC to replace it and I expect it | should last a few years too. | | I mostly just write code for a web app I sell so I don't | need the latest or most powerful Mac and the `14 model | will run the current Mac OS and the latest versions of | the software I use most, mainly BBEdit and web browsers. | | I know I'd be pretty disappointed if I'd bought a Macbook | M1 and that happened to me. | pmontra wrote: | To be fair, every computer got obsoleted fast on those | years. The Moore law was strong back then. | freemint wrote: | 80s Apple computer were not speced for a long, useful | life. | geoffeg wrote: | I don't mean the specs but the quality of the hardware | design itself. | kurupt213 wrote: | 80s apple computers were highly upgradeable. Multiple | expansion slots and 3rd party options. | | It was a completely different ecosystem, but it was when | Woz was making design decisions on the apple II | samatman wrote: | I consider M[Int] Pro line as a solid return to form, and | I bring that up here because of the braided MagSafe cable | which comes with it. | | I'm hard on cables, and I have an instinct for what's | going to crap out on me. I expect this cable to last. | That thing where they can afford to make a decent cable, | know how, and just... wont? This cable isn't one of | those. | | It will, however, show grime. They haven't let go of | Apple White Which Reveals If You're a Slob yet, and I'm | dubious they ever will. | | Edit: have to take that last paragraph back, they sell | them in black. I did figure on having two... | hiram112 wrote: | > It will, however, show grime. They haven't let go of | Apple White Which Reveals If You're a Slob yet, and I'm | dubious they ever will. | | Haha, we had an all-hands meeting in-person for the first | time since Covid last week. There were about 15 of us | sitting around a huge conference table. Many white | Macbook chargers and their cables sprawled across the | table. | | I did get very self conscious when I realized all the | rest were pristine white - as if they had just unwrapped | them for the first time - while mine was pit-stain yellow | with the connector frayed and blue. I had never noticed | how gross it was until seeing it right next to the newer, | clean chargers. | | I blamed it on the cat - he sits on the cord when it's | lying on the bed. I'm not sure they were buying it, | though. | kurupt213 wrote: | Apple offered upgrades from the IIe to IIGS. It was an | in-store motherboard and lower case swap | seiferteric wrote: | My wife had a MBP with support plan years ago. The track pad | started failing and it wouldn't always click even after you | felt it depress and was slowly getting worse and worse. I took | it in and the guy basally said there was no problem and I was | just not pressing hard enough or something... It was very | noticeable after using it for a while... Anyway I ended up | ordering a new track pad online and replaced it myself and of | course it fixed the issue. Still bothers me today. | scottydelta wrote: | It's impossible to do self repairs on macbooks these days. | | Apple intentionally solders all the components together to | prevent self repair. Even the battery is soldered to the | system. | | https://9to5mac.com/2019/07/12/2019-13-macbook-pro-teardown/ | kayodelycaon wrote: | Technical quibble here. The batteries are glued to the | case, not soldered to anything. The power cables still use | connectors and can be easily popped off. | foldr wrote: | They solder components to save space and increase the | reliability and power efficiency of the connections. Apple | doesn't care about self repair, but they aren't using | solder instead of connectors as part of a scheme to | actively thwart it. | scottydelta wrote: | Apple is literally known for their anti-right-to-repair | stance. | | There is a youtuber named Louis Rossman(1.7 million | followers) fighting Apple on this since more than a | decade. | | Here is his channel: | https://youtube.com/user/rossmanngroup | prvit wrote: | Rossman isn't exactly trustworthy. Remember this? | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw3-j_RaX74 | scottydelta wrote: | Shows the video as private. I cannot watch it. | prvit wrote: | Rossmann went on a drunken, paranoid rant about how the | macbook webcam has secret hardware to spy on him. He took | the video down after widespread ridicule. | | Original video is mirrored on archive.org https://archive | .org/details/Kat.crlouis.rossmann.backup/what... | | Not sure if that link goes straight to the right video. | It's the last video of the playlist, titled "what's up | with that 4 gb man" | foldr wrote: | You're conflating two separate issues: | | (i) Is Apple anti right to repair? | | (ii) Does Apple solder certain components primarily | because it makes repair more difficult? | | Even if the answer to (i) is yes, the answer to (ii) can | be no. | | Most unpluggable components in most laptops are never | intentionally unplugged over the lifetime of the device. | Connectors take up space, can come unplugged | accidentally, and degrade signal quality. Those are the | reasons for soldering components in a modern laptop. | stingrae wrote: | I would argue that they aren't anti right-to-repair. They | are against poor quality repairs. | | The issue is if you let individuals and 3rd party stores | do repairs, there is no way to validate that they are | doing it in a reliable/quality fashion. This is | especially problematic when phones are getting more and | more resilient to various environments (Like the addition | of IP68) | | When a customer has a repair done poorly and issues come | up, they come to Apple for support. | kjkjadksj wrote: | At this point I'm thinking the 2012 I own could be the last | laptop I bother buying. Its performant enough for being a | day to day computer with an ssd and 16gb ram, and these | days if I need more horsepower for one job I'm better off | using a server. Plus the parts are so cheap on ebay and you | can do most repairs with a phillips head screwdriver. | amelius wrote: | > Apple intentionally solders all the components together | to prevent self repair. | | As much as I like to bash Apple, it could also be that they | soldered/glued everything to miniaturize the product | further, for example. | vbezhenar wrote: | You can use heater and solvent to deal with glue. It's not | impossible. Not DYI-friendly - for sure. | cmatthias wrote: | > DYI | | Do Yourself It? | sudosysgen wrote: | The solvent has a propensity of getting into other | components and ruining them, esp. the trackpad. | legitster wrote: | Meanwhile, my Thinkpad has built-in drainage holes. | johnbellone wrote: | Those stickers are in nearly all of their devices. | curious_cat_163 wrote: | I have had mine crash on me multiple times now. | | Last it happened was today, in the middle of a Safari browsing | session. | maerF0x0 wrote: | > it is frustrating that apple doesn't believe its costumers. | | What's notable here is there is 49 pages of seemingly mostly "me | too". It should give Apple at the very least pause for | reevaluation of their stance. One guy saying "I didn't do it man" | is not evidence, but a clearly non coordinated global trend of | people claiming the same thing? Pretty compelling. | cycomanic wrote: | Why would it? Seriously a large proportion even of the users | bitten by this will still run to buy the next shiny apple | device they release and then there is the other part of the | users who are not affected and will blame the affected users | for doing something wrong, because apple can't be in the wrong. | I never understood the personal attachment and identification | that some brands elicit it people (but credit to Apple to | achieving this, and I don't mean this ironically. They must be | doing something right to gather such a following). | noizejoy wrote: | Benn Jordan just made a nice video explaining how brand | loyalty is based on a deeply human trait: | | https://youtu.be/HqMMRh3VRT8 | [deleted] | pattle wrote: | I think having a strong personal attachment to a brand is | actually pretty normal. If you spend a large chunk of your | time using a companies products and those products make your | easier/better it's understandable. | jamwil wrote: | I don't know that its what Apple does right but that the | broader PC market continues to shoot itself in the foot. | Little things like pre-installed bloatware and the inability | to figure out smooth trackpad scrolling (still!) keep me | firmly on Apple devices. And more recently, the M1 platform | is remarkable, so I tip my hat to them for that and doing the | basic stuff right (mostly--there have been blemishes | obviously). | 8ytecoder wrote: | It's also because a good chunk of people also lie to get | something fixed under warranty. Didn't the other weak the | article that rose to the front page talk in detail about the | various frauds? | | I wish Apple wasn't like this and spent time investigating | each defect accurately to identify and issue "recalls". They | sure have the money to do it. But like every other | capitalistic company - including the ones that put a 1 ton | missile on the road - they fix something when they have a | financial incentive to do it. Class action lawsuits are a | good incentive. Loss of goodwill is a hard to quantify but | important one as well. And I'm sure there's a suit somewhere | in Apple spaceship doing these calculations. | tomxor wrote: | > credit to Apple to achieving this, and I don't mean this | ironically. They must be doing something right to gather such | a following | | Credit in a disgusting kind of way yes. A skill you can only | admire abstractly. | | This kind of thing has been going on for well over a decade | now, the reality distortion field that Jobs left behind is | very real... It's China level of denialism, pretty sure | Apple's internal media control slogan is "never admit fault, | deny everything, at all cost" - even big fat class action | cost, because that's cheaper than breaking the delusion of | the pretty, perfect device with a massive markup. | | Once you've been burned once and they disrespect your | intelligence you abandon them if you have any sense... but to | be fair to others, some people become entrenched in the | ecosystem and effectively have lockin, many of those poor | souls do what any human does to protect their sanity in an | impossible scenario, they lie to themselves to justify the | economic and emotional cost to them - which ironically helps | sustain the delusion for everyone else. Although maybe the | single benefit of the big apps turning everything into a | cloud subscription is that it reduces this somewhat. | | But everyone has limits, I'm convinced there is a critical | mass Apple will disenchant where the illusion will finally be | broken for everyone and they burn their image. Since the | company is well and truly into the milking stage I'm sure | this will happen sooner than later - Investors have limited | life spans even if companies do not. | BitwiseFool wrote: | Folks like you and I can interpret it this way, but the | accountants and engineers at Apple would have to provide much | more rigorous evidence to the high level executives that would | need to sign off on some remediation program, recall, or | redesign. Granted, at a lower level it could be used as | justification to look into more rigorous/empirical | investigation. | londons_explore wrote: | There is almost certainly a team at Apple with a very keen eye | on this - many teams in fact - everyone from PR ready to do | damage control to manufacturing trying to not make it happen | anymore to engineering trying to come up with a fix or | workaround to stop more screens in already sold products | breaking. | | But none of those teams are allowed to make any noise | externally till legal has fully understood the issue and | decided what damage 'admitting' to the fault might cause in any | potential future lawsuit. That's why it appears Apple isn't | paying attention. | trophycase wrote: | They likely know and don't care. My old macbook pro updated to | the latest OS and it completely bricked the machine. Every time | I'd try to watch a video the thing would overheat. Reverted the | OS and the issue was completely fixed. | | Bought a new iphone recently and the camera simply can't focus | at short range. | Spooky23 wrote: | You only hear about it because it's Apple and they have like 6 | SKUs of products that they sell millions of. | | When the batteries bulge or screens fail on some random Dell | made by a subcontractor in Vietnam, nobody cares as they have | like 80 models of laptop for every market segment. | | The bullshit thing in my mind is that Apple took away the | ability for store staff to make discretionary calls to bypass | stuff like this and do what's right for the customer. | r3012 wrote: | > The bullshit thing in my mind is that Apple took away the | ability for store staff to make discretionary calls to bypass | stuff like this and do what's right for the customer. | | It could be that, or retail workers are sick of us and aren't | making calls in our direction anymore. | | https://www.businessinsider.com/retail-workers-leaving- | quit-... | Kaze404 wrote: | Who is "us" here? Abusive customers? I can't fathom someone | coming into a store being nice as expected and a retail | over fucking them over just because. | AussieWog93 wrote: | It absolutely happens, especially with lower class (as in | "white trash" class, not working class) customers. | | Workers fuck with them just because they can. | jug wrote: | Yeah these kinds of en masse reports have resulted in an Apple | response in the past so here's hoping for everyone subject to | this. They use to be awfully reluctant though. An article in | mainstream news and sustained pressure should help. | thedougd wrote: | I had an M1 Macbook Air screen delaminate for no apparent reason. | I'm guessing that was the reason, but it looked like a giant | bubble formed right in the middle of the screen. I'm guessing all | the edges delaminated? It looked like water damage, but of course | was never in contact with water. | | The screen was replaced for free. | xyst wrote: | Owned a 2015-2016 MacBook for college. It shit the bed 2-3 years | later. The cost of replacing the motherboard vs buying a brand | new one was nearly identical. Ended up just splurging for a 2017 | MBP. | | Besides the butterfly keyboard going to shit (fortunately, | replaced under warranty) 2 years ago. It has worked wonderfully | for me so far. | amelius wrote: | Perhaps the object/impurity that caused the contact point crack | was behind the screen, not in front of it. | kelsolaar wrote: | Any clue of what is causing that? Is it the aluminium chassis | expanding as a function of temperature and causing stress on the | glass? | djmips wrote: | Maybe in a fraction of the cases but from reading the thread, | I, pessimistically estimate that most of the problems are user | induced or a different issue. | AmVess wrote: | I'd have to agree. I don't know how many companies supply | Apple with MBA M1 screens, but I've had mine since they came | out. Dragged it all over the states and still no crack. | | I always open it in the middle, and I don't wrench it open. | For some reason, some people don't understand that thin and | light doesn't mean indestructible. | LtWorf wrote: | Just because it didn't happen to you doesn't mean that | other people are necessarily liars. | samatman wrote: | Mostly likely culprit, if this is a real problem, is a poorly- | annealed batch of screen glass. If the glass is under internal | tension, it's only a matter of time before cracks show. | Conversely, screen glass is ordinarily pretty hard to damage | and screens are designed to handle any expansion in their frame | as a matter of course. | | At this point, there's no way to tell if this is an actual | issue, or if it's just the enormous customer base of Apple | amplifying owners who damaged their screen and would like Apple | to replace it for free. | | I'm sympathetic after owning one of the cursed butterfly decks, | but I'm pretty wait-and-see about it. I'm not nervous about my | 16" M1 Pro, which is the most tank-like laptop Apple has made | since the days of removable batteries and built-in DVD-R. | bogwog wrote: | > or if it's just the enormous customer base of Apple | amplifying owners who damaged their screen and would like | Apple to replace it for free. | | Apple has had an enormous customer base for decades, they've | had a support forum for probably as long, and people have | been wanting free repairs for their broken idevices since | forever. | | And while I'm no expert on the history of Apple's support | forums, I think it's safe to assume that a 49-page forum | thread about an issue like this isn't a common occurrence. | (maybe the butterfly keyboards got one like that) | | Plus Apple is not the only manufacturer with a support forum | and a large customer base, and I don't think I've ever heard | of a mass concentrated effort to get free repairs by spamming | a support forum. | nbzso wrote: | First rule of a longtime Apple user: Never be an early adopter. | Second rule of a longtime Apple user: Always use AppleCare+. | Third rule of a longtime Apple user: When you have a problem with | your beloved Apple hardware, always have a pile of cash on you, | just in case. | jmull wrote: | Bad advice, IME. | | First Intel Mac, first iPhone, first Apple Watch... for that | matter, second Mac ever, and, however you want to rank it, an | Apple ][. | | I don't regret any of them (my mother paid for the early Apple | and Mac, but I know she didn't regret the either). | calsy wrote: | AppleCare+, pay even more for 'Apple Insurance' so you can | repair the expensive defective product sold to you already | covered by warranty and consumer law. | | Have extra money available to pay for repairs that can only be | carried out by Apple for the laptop you paid a premium for | believing it was reliable. | | Forfeit your money and do not question Apple's role in selling | you a defective product. Besides, we can't expect Apple to | cover the costs of repair for the defective products they sell, | thats just asking too much. They aren't made of money. But you | are.. | sitzkrieg wrote: | if only there was some other approach! | least wrote: | I'd imagine most people deliberately using Apple products | have made considerations for other options. Unfortunately | there is no panacea like you seem to be alluding to, just a | different set of tradeoffs. | amelius wrote: | There is. If you find a defect, just hold a heat-gun near | your screen for a while. Apple will not be able to explain | the cause of the resulting damage. You will get your money | back, as you should. | lawgimenez wrote: | This is worrying, my wife just bought the same exact model a few | months ago. In my country there is no Apple Store. | usaphp wrote: | I've had the same happened to mine because of the camera cover. | When lid is closed - it rubs against the trackpad edge and a | little pressure from the top, when it's closed, will cause it to | crack. | peppertree wrote: | Impact at the edge of screen created microscopic crack. Thermal | change caused the crack to spread. It happens all the time with | vehicle windshields. | kjkjadksj wrote: | Then why hasn't it happened for other macbooks? The corners of | my 2012 are noticeably deformed from impacts and the screen is | fine | shadowfacts wrote: | Years ago, the screen of my 2012 rMBP had broken seemingly | out of nowhere one time after I opened the lid. I knew | someone who was carrying a couple pieces of paper stapled | together inside the lid of their 2016-era MBP, and when they | opened it, the staple had broken the glass. Just because you | don't hear about it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Glass | breaks, it happens. | kayodelycaon wrote: | Hell, the newer iPads flex a bit and we don't have screens | break constantly. | monocasa wrote: | Screen glass breakage is very dependent on the shape and | vector of the stress. Flexing is generally not that bad, | nor are light impacts or scrapes on the front, but a | remarkably tiny pressure on edge will cause a crack. | kergonath wrote: | Exactly. The surface treatment of these glasses make | their faces very resistant to fracture, but the layer in | the middle inside is much less tough. An impact on the | side is really bad for this type of glass pane. | kergonath wrote: | > Then why hasn't it happened for other macbooks? | | It most certainly has, but might not have been publicised. I | remember some noise about iPhones screens failing in more or | less exactly the same way ~10 years ago. These things are | bound to happen regularly, but we don't hear about it. Ion- | exchange strengthened glass is resistant to microcracks, but | even so fracture happens. | | > The corners of my 2012 are noticeably deformed from impacts | and the screen is fine | | Glass is an interesting material. It can bend and deform in | the right conditions, and shatter in others. Your experience | would show that the screen is actually well designed (my 2015 | MBP had also a deformed corner after having fallen open from | a table; I was actually pleasantly surprised that the hinge | survived). | nice2meetu wrote: | Deformed corner here too! it was sitting precariously on a | pile of papers on top of a set of plastic drawers on top of | a standup desk which was half raised (where the printer | lives, was silly I know). My daughter came in and bumped | the table and my open MacBook fell directly on the corner | of the screen. It has a dent there now but no other damage | peppertree wrote: | The fracture pattern depends on the direction of impact. It's | easily verifiable under a microscope. From the thread it | sounds like Apple did indeed verify them with a microscope. | However people are not always rational, especially when money | is involved. | minxomat wrote: | The thread has 50 pages and 2000 votes, so I'd guess even | if that is a factor, it wouldn't account for all of them. | samatman wrote: | Maybe. Apple sold 30 million Macs last year. 2000 | complaints would be 0.0067% of those. | anakaine wrote: | If you go through and read a few it becomes plain that | there's a few themes emerging. Clean everything, lid | closure. | | I find it a bit laughable that they can "verify it under a | microscope". The glass is present under tension, and a weak | point releasing that tension could very well cause local | divoting at the origin of the crack as the pressure is | released towards that point and microsharding occurs. | thehappypm wrote: | Is the screen more slammable (for lack of a better word)? My | HP has these two rubber stoppers that prevent the Screen from | slamming the keyboard. | pmontra wrote: | My HP also has a piece of cloth to put on the keyboard | before closing the lid. I always suspended by pressing the | power button and disabled suspend by closing the lid, so it | is natural for me to use that extra protection. | no-s wrote: | > Thermal change caused the crack to spread. It happens all the | time with vehicle windshields. | | This happened to my brother's brand new Tesla. Tiny impact on | the edge extended all the way across after a week in Tucson. | Very sad, especially because the service was difficult (had to | return to SoCal for repair). The next week around Tucson I | looked for and spotted over a dozen Teslas with similar crack | extensions. | | It's probably safer for it to be flimsy. If it shatters it will | become chunks and not shards. The Air screen is big enough to | make killer shards... | ayberk wrote: | This is a good place to remind that _never ever_ buy a Tesla. | I was a huge fanboy and I do love my car, but their customer | support and service centers are absolutely horrendous. | | It's all great when nothing is wrong, but things eventually | go wrong and you regret ever owning one. - Signed, a Tesla | Owner who has been dealing with a very minor damage because | some idiot couldn't take their eyes off of their phone in a | 25mph zone. | ProfessorLayton wrote: | Car windshields are laminated with plastic in the middle, | precisely to prevent shards, and to not have it completely | collapse in the event of an impact. | | The rest of the windows are tempered glass, also to prevent | shards. | jabbany wrote: | Actually, windshield glass is designed to prefer cracking | (and holding together) instead of shattering into chunks when | it breaks like the side windows. | | Relevant video about this design: https://youtu.be/aAsUG- | jbLlM?t=131 | | Computer screen glass is also usually laminated (though here | the goal is to fuse the glass very closely to the LCD panel | so there's no unsightly "air gap") | cycomanic wrote: | There used to be a science show on German television that | always demonstrated interesting engineering science bits at | prime TV hours (knoffhoff show). They demonstrated | windscreen security glass by someone jumping on a large | (2mx2m or more) sheet between two wooden blocks. It looked | like someone jumping on a springboard. At the end another | person tapped the side of the glass using a small hammer | and the glass shattered into tiny little pieces. The | jumping guy was still on it, but did not get cut because | all pieces where dull shards. | | It really impressed my young self at the time. | ashildr wrote: | Saying you are about 50 years old without saying you are | about 50 years old :-) | bergenty wrote: | Wait what? What do you mean return to socal | nwatson wrote: | Vehicle likely had to be transported from Tucson, Arizona | to SoCal == Southern California to a factory or more fully- | equipped Tesla repair facility. | kergonath wrote: | Indeed. That's how glass works. | Maursault wrote: | It is possible many or most of the reported screen cracks are | due entirely to thermal changes. The M1 MacBook displays _are | made of glass_. Glass is a poor thermal conductor and rapid | changes in temperature will create stress fractures in the | glass that will eventually crack. When heated, thin glass | begins to crack. | | Let's say, for argument's sake, the OP has their desk in front | of a window. At night, temperatures go down, and in the | morning, sunlight provided enough thermal change fast enough to | cause a small crack, which expanded with stress. I'm not saying | that is what happened, just that thermal stress can explain a | lot. | | Voices can already be heard that Apple's product can't even | handle sunlight. But it isn't sunlight, it is the delta-T over | delta-t the change in temperature over time. Taking a device in | thermal equilibrium of an air conditioned environment outside | into a hot car will crack the glass with no impact event. | Happened to me. I was holding an iPad in my hands in front of | me, and _I saw the glass crack_ , and I knew immediately what I | did wrong. The change in temperature was too extreme and too | fast. | londons_explore wrote: | But it's also possible to design glass which is pretty much | immune to thermal stress cracking.... | | Perhaps Apple should have done so, knowing their users might | expose their laptops to sunlight... | vorpalhex wrote: | > Taking a device in thermal equilibrium of an air | conditioned environment outside into a hot car will crack the | glass with no impact event. | | The $1000+ device should be able to handle going outside | hammock wrote: | > It happens all the time with vehicle windshields. | | Easy solution for windshields which avoids full replacement is | to go and have somebody inject epoxy(? some sort of agent) into | the crack which will prevent it from spreading larger | _gtly wrote: | I know someone who put a square of gaffer's tape over their | Macbook Pro's video camera (in theory to protect their privacy) | and one day they lifted up the screen and it was cracked. It | seemed like that little bit of tape might have been the culprit. | thomas-st wrote: | My 14" M1 MacBook Pro screen repair cost was $809. Supervisor | refused the waive the fee. The screen cracked for no apparent | reason and then completely stopped working. | | Some firm already filed a class action complaint, and I submitted | my details: https://classlawdc.com/2021/08/04/m1-macbook-screen- | crack-in... | umvi wrote: | > My 14" M1 MacBook Pro repair cost was $809 | | My custom Ryzen 7/RX 570 Linux PC built from parts cost less | than this, so a repair of this magnitude just boggles my mind. | At that point just buy yourself a new computer. | numlock86 wrote: | What boggles my mind is why you didn't get a computer with a | Centrino Core 2 Duo with an integrated graphics card. | | > Ryzen 7/RX 570 | | At this point just buy yourself a couple of used computers. | thomas-st wrote: | Honestly, if I had broken the screen, this seems like a fair | cost for a new display like this. Apart from the the cost, | I'd also like to mention the repair process (via mail at | their Houston repair facility) was very speedy. I got a quote | within hours of them receiving the product, and it was | shipped the next day after I approved. The supervisor | mentioned that if they ever set up a repair program for this | issue, they will refund the fee. | | Now, if only they could also fix the audio crackling issue | that me and many other users are experiencing... (https://www | .reddit.com/r/macbookpro/comments/s4r1m5/macbook_...) | xdfgh1112 wrote: | Wow you praise Apple even after they screwed you! The cult | of Apple is still going strong! | | Edit: parent was made to pay 800 dollars for a screen | breaking which wasn't his or her fault, but still goes on | to say "they said they might refund it later" and "the | repair was quick". The rationalisation is painful to read. | thomas-st wrote: | To be clear, it's completely unacceptable they are | charging for this repair. My intent was to give some | perspective on how the repair process went overall, I | needed the device back for work. | | While apart from the cracked screen issue the hardware is | amazing in my opinion, the overall software issues make | using macOS painful sometimes (processes running at high | CPU -- now mostly offloaded to the efficiency cores, | WebKit views having issues loading, anything syncing to | iCloud sometimes not working, sometimes working on the | 2nd try, Messages/Apple Mail search only finding some of | the messages, audio crackling issues with wired | headphones/AirPods/built-in speaker, etc.) | josephcsible wrote: | > if I had broken the screen | | But the whole point is that it's Apple's fault that these | screens are breaking, not the users'. | TheDong wrote: | People just don't understand how good desktops are, right? | | On my flight yesterday, when I pulled out my full tower Ryzen | with 2x 3090 GPUs, I got told that the power outlet on the | plane seat shouldn't be used for my 1200W power supply. | | And yet, the same flight attendant said nothing to the | macbook user a few rows over who was clearly plugged in. | Frankly, it's appalling how few people understand that a | cheaper desktop is comparable to a laptop. | depr wrote: | Next time bring a portable battery. | kurupt213 wrote: | You should have shown her the daisy chain of 5v lithium | batteries you used to power it. That really puts the | stewardess in bitch-mode | sseagull wrote: | I mean, unless you are an extreme outlier, you spend more | time on the ground than on an airplane. Why would you | optimize for working on an airplane over your typical | workday? | | For me personally, 99.9% of my work is done at my desk (1), | so why not have a more powerful, upgradeable, repairable | computer to work with? | | (1) I'm not hip enough to work from coffee shops | jrockway wrote: | I agree with you. When I travel I just take a tablet for | some reading on the flight and maybe some light HN | reading before bed. To do actual work, I kind of like my | split keyboard, mouse, and 32 CPUs. I don't bother trying | to get a ton of work done on the road; if I need to talk | to someone in another state or country for work, we have | video conferences now. | | It's amazing how much shit you get on HN of all places | for sitting at your desk programming. | intrasight wrote: | I too don't get this transition to working on laptops. | What a crappy form factor. I do have two of them - and | they get used about 2 hours per month on average. | mikeryan wrote: | I actually understand the subjective differences for | people to choose a desktop over a laptop. | | But I really don't get your point about form factor. | Using, external monitors and adding a keyboard and mouse | to a laptop is a non-issue. | bsuvc wrote: | I mostly work outside in an Adirondack chair, so for me, | it does make sense to optimize for mobility. | | I don't have a Mac though... Dell XPS 13 running Ubuntu | works great for me. Never had an issue with the three | I've had over the years. | pmontra wrote: | My work is done almost 100% at a desk, in different rooms | of my home depending on the season (some get too cold or | too hot) or on a whim. A desktop won't do. And sometimes | I really take my laptop to somewhere else. | sseagull wrote: | Different strokes for different folks and all, but it's | hard for me to imagine this. I have 3 large monitors, so | even if I had a laptop I would want to move those around | as well. | | After working with large monitors, I don't know how | anyone gets serious work done on a laptop screen. | | I do have a laptop, but it is relatively inexpensive and | used mostly as a thin client to my desktop (as others | have mentioned). | | Edit: I will also add, I like having a dedicated space | for work. This prevents work from creeping into my life | everywhere in my house. I can't be on the couch, watching | a movie, and have the urge to work - I'm not in my work | space! | smoldesu wrote: | Yeah. Only thing I'll add is that I use my laptop as a | thin-client, so I don't ever find myself pining for more | power. Works great for watching YouTube, editing text and | SSHing into my desktop via Tailscale when I want some | more power. Using my Macbook in the same way is just more | of a hassle, but that's probably because I don't use | iCloud/the App Store... | z9znz wrote: | > extreme outlier | | Contrary to popular myth, not all of us live and work in | a basement. Myself and many people I know, my non- | technical girlfriend included, use our laptops all around | the country and in multiple other countries. | | I do agree about upgradeable and repairable, which is why | the Framework laptop is getting pretty attractive. But | there's still nothing that compares in performance and | portability to my M1 Air. | runjake wrote: | Right, that's why they said "outlier". Most people aren't | going all around the country and multiple other | countries. Most people sit at home on a computer, and sit | at work on another computer. | | Like you, I am also an outlier, using my MacbBok all over | Hades. | threeseed wrote: | > Most people sit at home on a computer, and sit at work | on another computer | | a) You don't know what most people do. | | b) I would add that those of us that are in a hybrid mode | e.g. working equally from home and work are given laptops | specifically because we are expected to use the same | computer in both environments. | [deleted] | z9znz wrote: | That also suggests that modern tech workers who have a | hybrid work arrangement are outliers. That's getting to | be a pretty large group. | | Heck, even before COVID, my previous company only gave | out laptops. Those things would get moved all around the | office - from desk to desk, to multiple conference and | meeting rooms, home, etc. This has been the norm for at | least 5 years in my experience. | threeseed wrote: | > For me personally, 99.9% of my work is done at my desk | | And for many of us their computer is not used exclusively | at a desk. | | It's also used at work, on a couch, on a plane, in bed | etc. | fzfaa wrote: | jabbany wrote: | Actually it really isn't. | | The more expensive something is the higher the ongoing costs | to maintain it. It's the same case with cars where more | expensive ones are also more costly to maintain and fix. | | When people buy a more luxury item, it's because there is | something about the item that they value where no cheaper | equivalent exists. MacBooks certainly have several such | features: quality of display, ecosystem integration, form | factor, battery life, speakers, aesthetics... These things | might not be the same things you value, but for those who | care it's just as important. This is also why some people buy | luxury cars and others just get the cheapest whatever that | gets them from A to B. | | FWIW, I run an HP Ryzen laptop that cost me just $350. But I | do so because the 2h battery, non-HDR (and probably not even | 100% sRGB) 1080p screen, lackluster speaker, and "borderline | serviceable" trackpad don't bother me at all. I would not buy | a MacBook as it offers no features I care about at a | significantly higher price, but I respect people who do buy | MacBooks because they fit their needs. | deebosong wrote: | That's how I feel about bikes. I like that enthusiasts get | the really nice fancypants stuff. But if I'm gonna be doing | my own maintenance, and riding for durability along with | functionality, then the lower end stuff ends up being more | for me than the latest & greatest. | jabbany wrote: | Yeah, I have a friend who has a nice fancy carbon fibre | bike meanwhile I just have a random no-name brand because | it does everything I need it to do for commuting and I | don't care that it weighs several kilograms more... | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | There's lots of things that are more expensive and last | longer with no maintenance. There was an entire thread | yesterday about how stuff doesn't last as long and | sometimes if you can afford it, you should pay 7x for a | Vitamix or KitchenAid. | | I'm not sure this compares to luxury cars, since MacBooks | more than ever are more like appliances. So it's arguable | that paying more should get you a more durable product. | | I mean there's loads of people who have pre-shitty keyboard | MacBooks that have lasted years. I have a great 2012 MBA | that still works great and I paid a premium for it then. | I'd be happy to pay a premium again for a similarly long | lasting computer. You're also paying the apple premium so | that if something goes wrong, they fix it with little fuss. | Something I have also used over the years. | jabbany wrote: | Not saying more expensive things don't last longer, just | that usually it is not proportional to the price | difference (and that's fine). | | If you really want to compare, if I got a similar spec-ed | MacBook to what I need, I'd have to spend easily $4k+. | That means I can outright write off my current cheapish | laptop 10+ times over the entire lifetime of an | equivalent Macbook and I'd still be in the green. | | Premium products are premium because you need them to do | something that no other device can. Durability _could_ be | a premium selling point for some stuff (tools for | example), but for electronics and cars it almost never | is. OTOH, I'd happily concede if someone wants to spend | $3k+ just to get the better monitor or better battery | life on the Macbook. | ReadTheLicense wrote: | The cheapest comparable desktop display costs $1500 (27 | inch)... | wtallis wrote: | Is a desktop whose price doesn't include _any_ display really | the best comparison you could come up with for a discussion | of laptop display repairs? | brewdad wrote: | The beauty of the desktop is that you can buy a display | that fits your budget and needs. A desktop monitor that's | equal to a typical 1080 laptop display can be had for $150. | If you need something better, you can spend more but very | few people will need to spend more than $500. | | If it breaks, you plug in a new one at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost | of the laptop repair with the only downtime being how long | it takes to drive to the store. | testing7787 wrote: | biohacker85 wrote: | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote: | May I ask how long the battery lasts on your your Ryzen 7/RX | 570 Linux PC? | Krasnol wrote: | A CMOS battery lasts probably something around 5 years. | qbasic_forever wrote: | Does it scale down your graphics and sound to look like | Tiger handheld LCD games when you're gaming on the CMOS | battery? | jxy wrote: | You can last a "full day" on AAA batteries. A manageable | configuration is likely double-suitcase with copper link, | each contains 10000 Alkaline AAA batteries. | threeseed wrote: | I just had my 14" M1 MacBook Pro screen crack a few days ago | and it was replaced for free. | | Be curious about your circumstances whether it was repaired at | an Apple Store and when this happened. | | Perhaps there is a policy that isn't being disseminated around | properly. | bozhark wrote: | Sounds like Apple might be aware it's their fault now. | | Perhaps they were intending on keeping that a customer | responsibility for the comment above yours. | judge2020 wrote: | There would be consistent policy if an official recall was | put out, but that looks even worse. | madeofpalk wrote: | How many years did it take for apple to issue their | 'recall' (Service Program, in Apple parlance) for the | butterfly keyboard woes? | rvz wrote: | So after all the hype that I have heard about the Apple Silicon | computers, it seems like it takes a screen crack to make it | useless and issue a repair cost of almost the price of a new | one. | | Especially when as soon as the computer fails to boot or stops | working, you have lost all data on the computer as the data | cannot be recovered. | | Sounds like a total scam. Glad I never bought one on launch | day. | z9znz wrote: | Obviously there is a defect problem affecting some of the new | Macbooks, and Apple needs to step up and take responsibility. | But that said, I personally think the Apple Silicon computers | (the Air in particular) are worthy of the hype. | | This 1 year old M1 Air with 16GB RAM is twice as fast as my | colleagues' Intel MBPs (comparing same year devices), and | it's _silent_. It rarely even gets warm, even with Docker, | several containers, JetBrains IDEs, Spotify, Firefox with a | million tabs, etc. all going. | | > the data cannot be recovered | | For most HN readers, not having an adequate active | backup/cloud sync system is difficult to imagine. When you | can transfer about 1GB/s to a modern fast solid state | external drive, plus we mostly have fast internet, it's easy | to have live and periodic physical and remote backups. | | If there's a scam to be found, it's that Apple has a real | problem affecting more than a few users, but they are denying | it. The scam is not in the computer but in the | warranty/repair practices. | Ycombigatorz wrote: | paulmd wrote: | > Obviously there is a defect problem affecting some of the | new Macbooks, and Apple needs to step up and take | responsibility. But that said, I personally think the Apple | Silicon computers (the Air in particular) are worthy of the | hype. | | > This 1 year old M1 Air with 16GB RAM is twice as fast as | my colleagues' Intel MBPs (comparing same year devices), | and it's _silent_. | | According to the comments, this bug affects people with | older Intel-based MBPs as well. | | It is, of course, unclear whether this is an actual issue, | or just a catch-all for people who damaged their screens | (micro-fracture) from various drops/impacts, and then over | time the micro-fracture eventually worked and became a | macro-fracture. They do that - glass can be damaged without | actually being _visibly_ damaged until you put it under a | microscope, and then some later much smaller stress (even | just thermal stress) causes it to fracture along the weak | spot. | | 50 pages of people sounds like a lot, but Macs are the most | popular single-series laptop in production (other laptops | have more in total, but it's fractured over many | manufacturers and series) and if that translates to 500 | posts / 200 unique users who broke their screen, across 10 | years of usage... that's not actually all that much, or | that surprising. | heartbreak wrote: | How did we get from a broken screen to unrecoverable data? | MacBooks can book with an external display connected. | haunter wrote: | And that's why most people buy $500 laptops. Even if the screen | broke you can probably buy a 3rd party one from Aliexpress for | $100. | | But $800 for a replacement one? I'd rather sell the MBP for | parts on eBay and buy a new one if must then pay that much. | Like you would get more for that with a broken screen for sure, | some people would fix it on their own or use it as a desktop | computer. | | But I don't have a SV engineer salary so what do I know | legitster wrote: | > And that's why most people buy $500 laptops. | | It's also worth pointing out that the $500 laptop will | probably last a lot longer than the most expensive Macbook. | All plastic, they use a lot of older/reliable technology, | they don't get used as rough - the most common failure mode | is they get too old/slow for the user. | tverbeure wrote: | I'm anecdotally writing this on a 2012 15" rMacBook Pro | that aside from some battery replacements just doesn't want | to die... | | It blows all the "premium" work laptops out of the water. | legitster wrote: | > It blows all the "premium" work laptops out of the | water. | | I disagree. I loved my Thinkpad T450s so much I bought an | identical used machine when I quit the job. Since then | it's been stepped on, dropped onto concrete multiple | times, had beer and wine spilled on the keyboard. | | It cost me $250 + $100 for a battery replacement + $34 | for a new keyboard (when the wine spilled on it, it still | worked but the keys were sticky) + $150 to upgrade the | RAM. | | It's currently running Visual Studio Code, Photoshop, and | prepping to run a pub trivia event later. | bardworx wrote: | In the last 12 years, I've owned 3 MacBooks. Maybe my | experience isn't common, but the units that I've bought, | have always outlived my windows machines. | | When averaged out to cost per year, in my experience, Apple | is way cheaper. | legitster wrote: | Part of the issue here is that "Windows machines" could | mean anything from an el cheapo Asus to a mil-spec | Thinkpad. | | I also think that people don't necessarily appreciate how | much quality improvements have been made in the last 5-7 | years in consumer laptops. Optical drives are gone, | everything has an SSD, performance has plateaued and AMD | is good again. | | Someone walking into Best Buy today and dropping $500 on | a laptop will be getting a much more robust machine than | when I did the same back in college. | decremental wrote: | I bought an Air in 2014 that lasted me until last year | when I bought a new one. The old one still works. It's | just too slow for my needs. I still open it up | occasionally for some things. Longest running computer | I've ever owned by a long shot. | lolinder wrote: | I probably use my laptops harder than most people, but this | has not been my experience with plastic laptops. I lost two | laptops in a row to the plastic case cracking. In the first | case the case broke around the hinge and destroyed a fan. | In the second, about half the keys on the keyboard stopped | working. I'll never buy another plastic-chassis laptop | after that second one. | acdha wrote: | This is lazy trolling - maybe it's true in your personal | experience but there are tons of people who can say | anything you want for n=1-2. | | If you want to do more than rehash 4 decades of "PC/Macs | suck" forum posts, try finding some hard stats on resell | value or enterprise fleet longevity. | z9znz wrote: | > And that's why most people buy $500 laptops. | | Most people is a sketchy expression, but I would venture a | guess that "most people" buy cheap laptops because they don't | really care, they don't know how to adequately judge which | ones are worth more, and they also just don't want to spend | much on a computer. | | It's hard to imagine, but "most people" actually care little | about computers. | JustSomeNobody wrote: | I needed a new laptop last year. I decided to care less | about my computer and so I chose not to get another Mac. | Got a small Lenovo instead. Runs great with Linux. Does | exactly everything I need it to do. | jdshaffer wrote: | I've been pondering doing something similar myself. If | you don't mind my asking, which Lenovo did you get and | which Linux variant does it seem to play nice with? :-) | nibbleshifter wrote: | I've been instructing (extended) family members asking | about laptops to just get an ex-biz lenovo (x220, x230, | etc) and let me configure Linux/do upgrades on it for the | last 8-9 years. | | It serves all their use cases, and most of them are still | working fine with no real repair need. | | The apple branch of the family though (my in-laws) have | been having hardware failures almost consistently during | that time. | comprev wrote: | For many people outside of HN demographic $500 is a lot of | money for "a computer" | | A macbook would be like buying a top spec Mercedes when all | they need is a no frills base model Ford. | ok123456 wrote: | Except the Mercedes is actually repairable. | surfpel wrote: | For most people, you'll have to take it to the mechanic | and it'll cost you an arm and a leg... wait that sounds | familiar... | nickjj wrote: | > For many people outside of HN demographic $500 is a lot | of money for "a computer" | | It would be but it's also kind of overkill based on the | specs you can get nowadays. | | I recently picked up a $350 Lenovo laptop new on Amazon | for a family member as a present. It has all of the | important things for a non-developer. A 1080p display, | fairly light, 11th gen Intel CPU (i3), 8gb of memory and | most importantly an SSD. It's lightning fast for browsing | the web, working with Excel and playing browser games. | jackmott42 wrote: | I bought a Framework laptop, new screen is cheap and very | very easy to swap in yourself. | lttlrck wrote: | I had to check.. $179!! That's amazing. | XorNot wrote: | Framework is my dream machine, still waiting for an | Australia launch. | | Also hoping we'll see them execute on some additional | keyboard layouts (or someone will) - avoiding Mac-like | keyboards is one of my primary desires laptop wise. | analog31 wrote: | There must be a market for expensive new laptops, because | there is a bustling market for refurbished ones -- my source | of new gear. | | But I have a hunch Apple will make good on this. | settrans wrote: | Even $500 is rich, now, for a laptop. iPads and Chromebooks | can be had for half that, and could run circles around the | laptops of yesteryear. Hell, MT8183-powered Chromebooks cost | $170 and still come with FHD touchscreens, 12-18 hours of | battery life and have acceptable build quality. | auggierose wrote: | And that's why you get Apple Care with your MacBook. | Ycombigatorz wrote: | josephcsible wrote: | That feels like saying "And that's why you pay the Mafia | their protection money." These screens are breaking because | they're defective, which is what the warranty is supposed | to cover. Why should you have to pay Apple more money for | them to do what they're already supposed to do? | armchairhacker wrote: | AppleCare is a good idea in general. Even if you're | generally careful, you never know when the mac will break | because of something that _was_ your fault | josephcsible wrote: | I break things infrequently enough that it's cheaper to | keep the money I would have spent on protection plans in | my bank account, and then just pay out of pocket when I | do. | auggierose wrote: | You are still free to sue them if it is actually a faulty | product. But maybe you want to get a quick repair done in | the mean time without shelling out $800? | smoldesu wrote: | Waiting for Apple to admit wrongdoing is like trying to | get blood from a stone. Remember the Nvidia chip failures | that Apple caused by using cheap solder on their Logic | Boards? They never fully owned-up to that one, despite | being 100% culpable. We eventually got admissions of | guilt for things like Lightning ports and Butterfly | keyboards, but that doesn't fix the thousands of devices | that are now using ass-backwards technology that can only | be replaced once broken. | | The other comment is entirely right. The fact that Apple | can sell a first-party service _entirely dedicated_ to | replacing broken iDevices is evidence enough that it 's a | racket. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | > You are still free to sue them | | Indeed you are free to sue a wide variety of criminals, | but ususally we don't refer to them with reverence and | respect | davidf18 wrote: | threeseed wrote: | > And that's why most people buy $500 laptops | | It's why you buy $500 laptops. You can't extrapolate that to | most people. | | Another reason is that they only have $500 and are buying | whatever is available in that price range. | adhesive_wombat wrote: | If I had $500, I'd get a second hand ThinkPad. Gets you a lot | more computer than a $500 semi-disposible thermally-crippled | mehbook. | | My T440s is still going strong, and that was second hand back | in 2016 (I did upgrade to an FHD matte screen). | 999900000999 wrote: | I can say without a doubt, the Mac minis are really good though. | | It should be illegal to sell a desktop computer with a hard drive | that can never be replaced. | | All hard drives go bad eventually, and while my 2012 Mac mini | allowed me to keep swapping out the hard drive. Which made it a | great computer up until I kind of retired it when I bought a new | m1 Mac mini. | | The current m1 Mac minis are all guaranteed to die within 10 | years when the hard drives fail. Sure, you can do an aftermarket | replacement, sure, I guess you could weld a new hard drive in . | | But most people are going to just throw them out and buy new | ones. I imagine depending on your usage, you might blow out your | unreplaceable hard drive even sooner. Won't surprise me if these | drives start failing within five or even 3 years for people | storing tons of large files | | Say you make a lot of 4K and 5K movies, I can't imagine a tiny | 256 SSD getting files written to it, and delete it from it over | and over again will last that long. | sschueller wrote: | I miss the old non-reflecting plastic screens we used to have on | laptops but I guess shiny glass sells better. Form over | functional IMO. | jabbany wrote: | Actually most budget laptops still use plastic screens... It's | only the high end models where things become glass. | | It almost makes sense, since if you're buying an expensive | laptop, you're probably OK with higher cost of ownership too | (as seen by the other replies on this thread of people spending | multiple hundreds to repair their screens). | martyvis wrote: | Touch screens need to be glass, which is also in a lot of | higher end non-Apple laptops. | pmontra wrote: | My 2016 car's touchscreen is plastic and capacitive (I | operate it my my fingertips, not with nails.) | jabbany wrote: | Actually they don't at all. I have a few older tablets that | have plastic screens and touch works just fine (not great, | but good enough). | | The main benefit of glass is just that it looks nicer | (clearer) and maintains the flatness of the screen better | (compared to even harder plastic which will still deform a | lot under pressure). On phones there is an additional | benefit of scratch resistance, but that's less of an issue | for laptops. | kjkjadksj wrote: | Apple used to offer that in 17" even | Kalanos wrote: | Isn't this what happens when you close any laptop when there is | something on the keyboard? | r3012 wrote: | https://9to5mac.com/2021/09/16/class-action-lawsuit-screen-c... | | Filed in Sept 2021. | | "A class-action lawsuit is being planned on behalf of M1 MacBook | owners who say that screen cracks were occurring during normal | use, with both the M1 MacBook Air and M1 MacBook Pro affected. | | Apple has mostly claimed that the cracks are the result of | accidental damage, including in the case of the 9to5Mac reader | who first contacted us" | mkagenius wrote: | My 10 day old Macbook with M1 Pro died suddenly last week. In | India we don't have Genius bars like in the States, what we have | is a franchise model where in small repair shops are given the | right to repair (only part to part replacement) and they probably | get some commission. The guys in these shops are very afraid of | Apple and its policies. Even things which normally would get | fixed in Genius bars without any second thought, these shops will | outright refuse to repair with the fear that Apple would revoke | their license. Now this has directly affected the customers like | me. Moreover, the staff in these shops are highly incompetent and | do not have good knowledge about Apple in general. In my case, | the shop lady put a big scratch on the top of my Macbook while | she was rotating it after putting it upside down on the table to | take pictures from all angle. Apparently it is required. Not sure | if they have this procedure in the US when you go to submit the | laptop. Now, the staff at the shop told me they do not want to | involve the management and they would do something about it. Had | this been completely managed by Apple, this wouldn't have made a | single dent in Apple's profit if they just decided to give me a | new laptop but since its a franchise model, they behave | differently, and do not want to lose a single rupee and hence | refuse to replace or even change the top case having the scratch | caused by them. | | Moreover, they will take around 2-3 weeks to replace your logic | board / battery / screen / keyboard. Just about anything. I don't | know if Apple will survive if they did this in the US. | | Apple support informed me that they are waiting for a reply from | the shop, about the scratch and status in general before they | could take any action - its been 5 days (including the weekend) | already. | bubblethink wrote: | The trick here is to buy Thinkpads which come with | international warranty and accidental damage protection. In | fact, the warranty/ADP is mostly useful in international | scenarios because within the US, you can buy parts pretty | easily on ebay. | webmobdev wrote: | Spot on. Apple direct customer support really suck in India. In | my city, the authorised store and service centre always act | entitled like they are doing me a big favour (probably because | we don't buy it from them directly). Last I went there to find | out if a discoloured iPad screen could be repaired, and they | said they can't examine my device unless I pay Rs. 500 (around | US $5-$6) first. So I shell out the money, and they look at the | screen and ask me if I have factory reset the iPad. I said yes, | I had done that. The service "engineer" then returns the iPad | to me and says, _" Apple does not repair any iPad hardware in | India. If it is under warranty, they will replace the device | with another iPad."_ I asked him why he didn't tell me all this | before charging me Rs. 500. He looked at me like he was staring | at a jackass (which I guess he was :). | lstamour wrote: | If it's only been 10 days, can you return it? That seems | extreme, yet maybe expected if something didn't quite pass QA, | it might show up that early. | | I can confirm that at a real Apple Store I've had genius bar | folks take photos of everything also. Seems to be Apple policy | these days, if they feel like it, to more easily blame the | customer. | | Doesn't always happen though, and sometimes it helps - e.g. I | received a "repaired" watch that had new dents in it and used | the photos to show that. Of course, they then said my watch was | missing a tiny microphone mesh I'd never seen before and still | demanded an AppleCare repair fee from me. I paid, because it | wasn't much in the long run, but I'm a bit annoyed at how much | Apple has changed lately. | | A battery replacement took 8 days to ship back to the store | (almost 14 days total) when they could have done it in-store | while I waited, but the system said "no, it must be shipped in | to be replaced" with no reason given. | scottydelta wrote: | India doesn't have return policies like US. | | Once you buy the product, there is literally no way to return | in. I have lived in both the places and there is a stark | difference between policies. | scottydelta wrote: | Had to deal with this recently. | | My iPhone's screen stopped working suddenly right before I was | due to travel. | | Apple authorized service center in India said it will take 2-3 | weeks to send and get it back from repair center. | | I decided to take it with me on my travel and just strolled | into an apple store in Dubai mall the next day. It was fixed in | literally 40 minutes there. | | It's surprising how Dubai with such a low population and low | apple users as compared to India gets this preferential | treatment. | londons_explore wrote: | Is it really surprising...? Think of the $$$$$$'s.... | tamrix wrote: | Lenovo and Dell will do next day business support. Apple needs | to up their game if they want to be taken seriously for | business needs. | pmontra wrote: | HP also does that. I used it once to replace a screen that | had a vertical band because a problem in a hinge. I called | the assistance, sent a video, they sent me the technician It | was about 90 Euro for 3 years. Then about the same amount for | the 4th year, then nothing, but I can buy parts and replace | them. It's an easy laptop to service. | ravenstine wrote: | I own an M1 mac and, although I haven't exactly abused it, | there's been multiple times where it fell pretty hard both flat | and on corners, and it's held up extremely well. | | However, it being a very thin laptop I think puts it at greater | risk of catastrophic damage, which is why I back up most things | in my home directory and treat the Air as something that will | either break or be traded in. That way if anything goes wrong, I | can get a new laptop and be minimally affected. | | This isn't to say that Macbooks should crack so easily, but I | think this is the right way to approach basically any consumer | grade device. | luis8 wrote: | Maybe it's a quality control issue?.I ordered a fully spec'd | macbook pro and it had a small dent in the frame of the screen. | It's really small but still piss me off that I paid 4k+ for a | device that was not pristine when I opened the package | willio58 wrote: | Did you take it in? | mupuff1234 wrote: | Doesn't the M1 air use the same chassis as previous Intel based | MacBook airs? | kayodelycaon wrote: | It does, but the screen or how it is attached is probably | different in some way. | | There is no way the M1 gets nearly as hot as my Intel machines. | hedgehog wrote: | I have an M1 Air, under enough load it'll run right up | towards 100C and that heat is localized over the processor. | It seems possible there's something about the thermal design | that makes this configuration more prone to this problem than | previous machines. Aluminum expands more than glass so the | problem would most likely be something around the chassis / | hinge area. | Bolkan wrote: | > There is no way the M1 gets nearly as hot as my Intel | machines. | | Maybe that's why it's breaking. | madrox wrote: | Sounds like a manufacturing or sourcing issue. I can only imagine | Apple hasn't recalled or notified customer support to be on the | lookout for this because Apple themselves isn't even aware of the | issue. How would they know? Techs writing up these issues are | probably attributing them all to user damage. Unless someone is | actively looking for a noticeable uptick in user damage cases I | doubt it even comes up. | viraptor wrote: | Apple is notorious about keeping information secret. We won't | know if they know about the issue or not until they act on it. | There's next to no chance that they'll say "we've noticed this | issue increasing and are discussing internally how to handle | it". It took years to acknowledge the keyboard issues. | conductr wrote: | They should know it's not normal to replace this many screens | on a ~2 year old product line, they should be monitoring this | type of data. It shouldn't have to bubble up from the front | lines of tech support | madrox wrote: | They absolutely should, but I would not be shocked if they | weren't | legitster wrote: | I still don't understand the appeal of aluminum/glass | construction. I couldn't think of a worse set of materials to | make a laptop out of. | | For comparison, nearly every other ultrabook manufacturer has | moved onto magnesium or carbon fiber for chassis construction. | Both materials are much physically stronger, lighter, and (most | importantly, imho) offer more intrinsic shock protection. | | I know people enjoy the "luxury" look and feel of a Macbook and | criticize other manufacturers for using composite materials. But | I don't think most people understand that for other | manufacturers, moving to aluminum unibody construction at this | point would probably be a _cost-saving measure_. | | Apple does not offer a single product that is MIL-SPEC tested, | despite nearly every other manufacturer having some or all of | their product line submitted to standardized endurance testing. | r3012 wrote: | There are trade-off there to consider. | | One get's ruggedness but carbon fiber is generally not a good | thermal conductor which could be a problem for a laptop with no | fans. And titanium is very expensive compared to aluminum. | | Like all engineering. It's about priorities. | londons_explore wrote: | I don't think the aluminium ever touches the glass... | | They always make sure there is a layer of plastic or glue a few | hundred micrometers thick to absorb any stresses from thermal | variations or falls. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | My friends vehicle hit an IED in Afghanistan. Everyone's | personal MacBooks that were inside broke but his Toshiba was | fine. | Tiktaalik wrote: | Carbon fibre chips and shatters. Metal bends. | | I really don't see how carbon fibre would be in an way better | than what Apple uses right now. | legitster wrote: | > Metal bends | | Aluminum bends and flexes. Magnesium alloys would shatter (if | you could even apply enough force). The chassis chipping or | flaking seems preferable to bending and flexing for the | longevity of the internals. | 95014_refugee wrote: | Aluminium is recyclable. | | Carbon fibre is a recycling disaster. Magnesium alloys somewhat | less so, but there is very little demand for them. | LordDragonfang wrote: | It's their brand. Apple continues to use aluminum because | they've invested a lot into it and they're good at it. I | occasionally hear a quote get thrown about on apple-centric | tech podcasts that Apple probably has the greatest | concentration of aluminum material science expertise not just | of tech companies, but of any company that exists. So much so | that Elon Musk poached one of their engineers to work on | aluminum for Tesla. | vonseel wrote: | There's an ongoing joke in the military, MIL-SPEC just means | it's a piece of crap that's going to break pretty soon. From an | engineering point of view, I'd like to believe that using all | MIL-SPEC components which are rated to last longer and in | harsher environments would amount to a more reliable product. | But maybe a product is more than the sum of its parts, and it's | possible a company can build a more reliable product despite | not using MIL-SPEC components or obtaining that certification. | Just something to think about. | legitster wrote: | Sure. But I think there is a fundamental difference in | philosophy when Thinkpad or MSI have web pages bragging about | how well their laptops handle moisture ingress and Apple just | has a warranty statement. | xt00 wrote: | But the screen is probably 0.25mm thinner people, the reduction | in reliability / fragility is definitely worth that folks!!! | blagie wrote: | I stopped by Sony phones because of the same issue. Sony Xperia | Z-series phones would spontaneously develop serious screen | cracks. I thought it was a fluke, but it happened over, and over, | and over. The last Sony phone I bought was in a padded case in a | padded bag when the screen cracked. | | Similar forum threads later appeared. | | It'd be interesting to know the root cause. | lewisl9029 wrote: | A friend just had this happen to their M1 Air under warranty and | Apple quoted him $400 for the repair claiming it was "accidental" | damage, even though he didn't do anything to it, like the 50 | pages of people who replied in the thread. | | Wanted to make a quick PSA against purchasing one of these to | save a few hundred bucks vs the M2 Air which hopefully won't have | this problem, and possibly put some pressure on Apple to take | care of their customers for what is clearly a widespread hardware | defect. | asdff wrote: | After the keyboard fiasco I am very nervous about upgrading my | 2012 macbook. I tried the last intel model air (same body as | the m1) and that computer was an absolute lemming. This 2012 | computer sure looks old and ugly, but I can replace all the | components myself with a screwdriver, and the body was designed | so the cpu could actually work at 100% and not end up thermally | throttled. The computer gets hot and the fans get loud for | sure, but it doesn't throttle any. Back then the base clocks | were probably set to more sane thresholds for heat's sake | versus today's turboboosted cpus in thin cases with poor air | circulation that inevitably throttle under long term load. | Spooky23 wrote: | During a recent heatwave, I was working on my back patio, | where the temperature peaked at 104F. | | My 14" M1 MBP didn't notice. No fan noise, no performance | issues. My windows laptop that I was barely using to test and | issue struggled. The CPUs were throttled down and the fan was | throttled up. My body found itself wishing that I had an | internal fan! :) | r00fus wrote: | My entry-level M1 Air is faster than my mid-spec 2019 MBP. | These physical design issues might be valid reason, but speed | isn't one. | karamanolev wrote: | Given the number of models with the butterfly keyboards which | were somewhat similar (model-wide issues, not acknowledged by | Apple, blamed on the user), what makes you think M2 Air is | going to fix any potential screen issues? | rexf wrote: | This. Hoping it's fixed on the latest version is wishful | thinking. | | Apple tends to downplay and/or ignore issues. Sometimes they | don't have to do anything and other times, they offer a | repair program. | Spooky23 wrote: | Usually they have repair programs for major issues. | | My 2015 MBP was replaced twice and repaired once for screen | delamination issues. | sidyapa wrote: | I have another issue. Randomly my M1 Macbook Air's frames drop | below 20fps and I can see a trail behind the cursor and when I | swipe between diff apps. Happens quite regularly with cpu idling | at 97% and 6-7gb of memory left unused | caboteria wrote: | Sounds like another round of "you're holding it wrong" - | https://www.wired.com/2010/06/iphone-4-holding-it-wrong/ | zizee wrote: | Earlier this year I threw my son his USB earbuds container. Not a | heavy thing. I threw it in a high arc, and on its way down it | glanced off the edge of his MacBook screen. It seemed like the | lightest of touches, but it must have hit in just the right (or | wrong) spot, and the screen ended up with a large crack, and | stopped working. I was super surprised how fragile the screen | was, especially given how tough iPads and iPhone seem to be. When | it happened, I couldn't believe such a light glancing blow could | have done it. I was definitely responsible for cracking the | screen through my actions, but it did highlight to me that | macbooks are not robust at all, not the high quality I had come | to expect. | varenc wrote: | digression: the linked URL seems to be using some internal apple | domain. The "proper" link is: | https://discussions.apple.com/thread/252794122?page=49 | | My guess is that the `origin-discussions2-us-dr-prz` subdomain | refers to a set of servers which the main discussions.apple.com | host would dynamically route you to based on IP location? | [deleted] | stereoradonc wrote: | Another reason to avoid Apple. Manufacturing defects! Why isn't | that being called as so? | 1970-01-01 wrote: | "for no apparent reason" is valid, and will be extremely hard for | an owner to prove. It's happened before in several television | sets: | | https://www.avsforum.com/threads/samsung-s4253-plasma-screen... | traveler01 wrote: | This is a widespread issue, it's almost like the computers are | designed for this to happen. I've seen Windows laptops without | any glass protection at the front with better durability. | xtracto wrote: | Apple is the king of planned obsolecense in the computing | segment. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-15 23:00 UTC)