[HN Gopher] Electric Vehicles as a Subscription ___________________________________________________________________ Electric Vehicles as a Subscription Author : khet Score : 8 points Date : 2022-08-19 21:48 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.autonomy.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.autonomy.com) | collias wrote: | How are they getting these cars? They only offer Teslas, and | ordering a (new) Tesla right now puts you at least 6 months out | from delivery. | blacksmithgu wrote: | This is not a good deal. The price is not that much cheaper than | a 4 year loan (~500 vs 750/mo), you still need a down payment, | still pay for power and insurance and parking, and you don't even | get equity! | | I can't see this being used by anything other than short term | rentals and corporations who like stable expenses. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | This sounds like a rebranded auto lease. | | $6000 to start and $500 a month sounds like the terms of a car | loan. If you just get a car loan for 5 years or whatever, it | might even be less. But then the payment goes away! Yes there are | maintenance fees, but those can be covered by insurance for | vehicles under 100,000 miles. Don't forget modern cars are | generally extremely reliable, and anybody can easily google the | reliability of a specific model. Unless you're one of the very | few Americans living in a dense urban center, you probably should | just buy a car instead. And while it loses value considerably | once off the lot, at least you have some sort of net worth intact | at the end of a few year term. | tylerfontaine wrote: | Wow. To get the advertised lowest monthly fee for a model Y | (Still $690/month!) you have to pay a $500 security deposit and a | whopping $7900 "start fee" | | While the deposit is refundable, the start fee doesn't appear to | be. So in 1yr, your total outlay is $16,680 for a $48,600 car. | That's essentially a 3 year payoff + 500 for deposits, and you | don't end up with a car after. | | It's not immediately clear what the advantage is here, I guess | unless you can't qualify for a regular car loan. But the equity | cost here is very high. | | They claim a loan on this car at 4.25% would cost 1900/mo, but | it's more like 1300. And Tesla financing is as low as 2.9%, which | is 1277/mo if you put 4500 down. Those go to 1203/mo and 1178/mo | respectively if you put down 7900. | | I dunno. Nothing about this seems like a particularly good deal | or good for it's users. They don't get the tax credits, they | don't get the equity, they just get a more economical rental. It | doesn't even look like there's a purchase option in the end like | a regular lease. | | Maybe I'm being cynical here, and I will admit I have never quite | understood the appeal of leasing anyway, but this concept just | totally escapes me, and the numbers don't make a good deal of | sense to me either. | kieranmaine wrote: | This seems similar to https://on.to/. We used this at my last | company to test our smart charging app and it seemed like a good | deal. It removed the hassle of having to sort insurance, | breakdown cover and servicing. It also included free charging at | BP, Shell and Instavolt chargers, which I used on a number of | occasions. | | They did raise their prices recently, but from my calculation it | still seemed like a fair offer and it's something I'd use. | UIUC_06 wrote: | "In the future you'll own nothing, and you'll be happy." | | Unless your Social Credit score gets too low. In that case, | you'll get a free trip to the re-education camp. | ccooffee wrote: | Eh, it feels like they're merely trying to undercut Tesla's | Lease offers. Sure, call it a subscription, and talk about low | time commitments (3 months vs 36 through Tesla), but it is the | same idea. | | Like leasing, this comes with the downsides of car ownership | (maintenance, fuel, parking) without the upside of "equity". | Based on the submission title, I was expecting something more | akin to ZipCar (but only electric vehicles). | r00fus wrote: | I like that they're trying to get people into EVs. Given the lack | of availability of EVs in general it seems this might get more | interest than it would have say, last year. | | The fact that they only have Tesla vehicles seems to indicate | that Tesla is executing where other manufacturers are not able | to. | sircastor wrote: | > The fact that they only have Tesla vehicles seems to indicate | that Tesla is executing where other manufacturers are not able | to. | | I think it says more about the subscription company than it | does about Tesla. It may imply a bias towards Tesla, a private | negated deal, or an investor requirement. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-19 23:00 UTC)