[HN Gopher] Scientists discover how mosquitoes can 'sniff out' h... ___________________________________________________________________ Scientists discover how mosquitoes can 'sniff out' humans Author : signa11 Score : 68 points Date : 2022-08-19 06:07 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com) | jokoon wrote: | This is what pushed me to wash myself often, not sure if it | works. | atum47 wrote: | It always amazes me this kind of break through. I hate mosquitoes | with all my heart. Hopefully some good repellent will come out of | this discovery. | telchior wrote: | I've been playing with the idea of an indoor mosquito capture | device, so this study is interesting to me on a number of levels. | (In case you're wondering why this would be any more difficult | than outdoor capture: almost all of these devices burn propane or | similar to generate the CO2, making them dangerous for indoor | use.) | | Here's a study from 2014, linked in the paper, where they edited | out the ability to sense CO2; the Aedes aegypti mosquitoes could | still home in on people: | https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(14)00155-X | | Most mosquito capture devices are just CO2 + heat; some are CO2 + | heat + odor. I haven't seen one so far that just combines heat + | odor, although maybe there's something out there. | | Different species of mosquito are attracted to different | chemicals, which helps explain why some people get targeted a lot | and others not so much. Here's a random fact I just learned from | another of the linked studies: Ae. aegypti are attracted to | ammonia. I guess the variability helps complicate making a | general-purpose machine that will work anywhere. | | Also, some species prefer humans over other animals... I think | they can still get confused, though. For instance, when I'm | hanging out with my black cat, the mosquitoes all gravitate to | him. The study suggests that mosquito sensory cues diminish with | distance (duh, I guess), but perhaps some cues become predominant | as the mosquitoes get closer. I've wondered if wearing patches of | black fur on my forearms might help attract them to a specific | location; haven't found any product that does that, either. | | One more random observation from the study: they're using a | pretty neat little membrane feeder full of blood to test the | mosquitoes. I'd heard of past studies where human lab assistants | just stuck in an arm to be fed on. I guess it's lucky for the | assistants that they've advanced past that, but I'd also read | that they acclimate fairly quickly. I wonder: would anyone be up | for intentionally exposing themselves like that? I've been | getting bitten by the same species for a year and still have skin | reactions; personally, I think if someone offered me a few days | of suffering to gain a resistance, I'd go for it! | brap wrote: | > I've wondered if wearing patches of black fur on my forearms | might help attract them to a specific location | | I've been running this experiment for about 2 decades now, | involuntarily, and my conclusion is no. | CatWChainsaw wrote: | Serious question, is there _anything_ good about mosquitos? They | 're famously the most 'dangerous' organisms to humans thanks to | their spread of malaria, and per the article at least some | species are tailored to prey on humans over other animals. Their | spit is what makes you itchy, and when they need to detach from | your skin they piss on you to make it easier. | chrisco255 wrote: | I think bats favor them. Lots of birds eat them too. But is | there anything "good" about any creature? Everything just | exists for its own survival. | mattigames wrote: | Its clear that "good" or "bad" in this context means if it | helps in any way any other species (including us) or | environment, and given that it stings a lot of animals | causing them some pain it already has some points on "bad". | vocram wrote: | > causing them some pain it already has some points on | "bad". | | Humans have quite a few bad points here as well. | version_five wrote: | > it stings a lot of animals causing them some pain | | Isn't pushing back on animals, in particular apex predator | types, "good" in some natural sense. Making areas | uninhabitable (except I assume for species that have | evolved, or will evolve, some kind of symbiosis) seems like | an important role. Any lifeform that gets an open field | will just grow until they run out of food or invite disease | or whatever. Unfavorable parasites or whatever you want to | call them are an important part of the balance, even if | they are clearly bad from the perspective of whoever | they're feeding on. | swatcoder wrote: | They transfer food from large animals near the top of the food | chain to small animals nearer the bottom, by air and over a | range of several miles. | | They might not be the only thing that can do the job, but it's | an important job. | DiggyJohnson wrote: | Isn't the top of the food chain where we see the biggest | thread to biodiversity. | | This reminds me of my favorite term from any college course: | "charismatic megafauna." | buu700 wrote: | Is this actually a useful effect of mosquitoes? It seems like | any organisms that feed on waste and corpses would accomplish | the same thing but better. | brap wrote: | This is a very interesting way to think about mosquitoes. | bombcar wrote: | I've heard they do some percentage of pollination. | xen2xen1 wrote: | Disease is a form of population control in a survival of the | fittest sort of way. They're probably much more useful than | we'd like to think in the long run. Scarily, we're replacing | all those mechanisms with us.. | peaslock wrote: | Perhaps they induce immunity to novel viruses by transferring | them in small doses between very different animals. Just | guessing though. | scottlamb wrote: | I once saw an article asking biologists this very question. I | wish I could find it. | | What I recall is: | | * some species of mosquitos are an important part of | ecosystems, e.g. a big chunk of biomass in tundra regions. (I | didn't even know there were any mosquitos there!) | | * but the specific species that carry malaria: no. They gave | some general platitudes about niches and every species being | important... Almost. These ones, kill them all. The important | stuff these mosquitos do can be done by other insects. | | Edit: https://www.nature.com/articles/466432a looks pretty | similar to what I read. Either this one is slightly more | nuanced or my memory dropped some of the nuance. | fuzzythinker wrote: | The majority of mosquitos are "good", they are food for | species and they pollinate plants. | | https://www.npr.org/2016/02/19/467395225/mosquitoes-what- | are... | s0rce wrote: | Mosquitos are notoriously bad in Alaska and Northern Canada, | I assume other areas are similar. | ch4s3 wrote: | Mosquitoes get a lot of shoutouts in The GULAG Archipelago. | zionic wrote: | Not at all. Only a small fraction of mosquito species bite | humans, we could eliminate them without impacting the | environment negatively. | brianpan wrote: | Serious answer in the form of a question: | | What is good about humans or dogs or trees? What does good even | mean- how do you define it? Good in what sense? | 11235813213455 wrote: | good is what help maintaining life as a whole, so a human | with a high carbon footprint is more bad than good, but a | lizard or a bird plays a role in the ecosystem, and at least | doesn't have a negative pollution impact, so they're not bad | | trees: that's the symbol of life, of usefulness, they help to | improve life in the ground and around, hold humidity, store | carbon for most of them, are homes of many species, provide | food, ... | | dogs or any pets: not useful at all for the ecosystem, | actually detrimental from their food | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_food#Impact and other | services dedicated to them and their direct negative impact | on the local wild life | | mosquitoes: useful because their larva feed a large | ecosystem, they also feed other insects, they also pollinate | Shugarl wrote: | Good if it's useful to us humans, bad if it's harmful. | 11235813213455 wrote: | For example wasps are extremely precious, for their role in | pollination, in the ecosystem in general | https://www.thoughtco.com/what-good-are-wasps-1968081 | | But I'm sure most people will say they're bad because of | the risk of a bite, neglicting and/or ignoring how they | indirectly help us to live | nkrisc wrote: | I generally share the same view but it seems pretty clear to | me they're asking from the perspective of human benefit. | zzo38computer wrote: | I think that mosquitoes should not be eliminated, whether they | bite humans or not. The other kind of animals (including human) | can live. You (and other living thing in this world) can (and | should) defend yourself but that is not the right to destroy | everything. | | What is good of human? To be bitten by mosquito. What is good | of mosquito? To be bitten by fish (according to another comment | below). What is good of fish? To be bitten by human. (Of | course, this is overly the simplification, but I hope to | explain the point that I am trying to make.) | DiggyJohnson wrote: | Absolute nihilism of all living things probably isn't as | obvious a philosophy as your comment makes it seem. | | If nothing in life is valuable, including life itself, what | gives? Do you still value less suffering over more suffering? | Am I misunderstanding your perspective? | Bud wrote: | This might be a bit brutal, but to be honest: yeah. They kill a | lot of humans. And humans very much need to be killed. There | are way too many of us, and we're doing an awfully good job of | wiping out Earth's biodiversity and long-term carrying | capacity. | beebeepka wrote: | I do believe there are too many of us humans on this planet | but something tells me we can do much better than culling | ourselves. | xen2xen1 wrote: | Thanos enters the building.. | mmmpop wrote: | Yeah but is that justice? | 11235813213455 wrote: | it's more natural selection than being rammed down on your | bike by a car | cm2012 wrote: | Great idea! Maybe start with yourself first though before | sacrificing others. | zzo38computer wrote: | Yes, there are too many humans; the human population is too | much. But, that does not mean that you have to kill everyone; | that is no good. However, if you eliminate all of the | mosquitoes, then that is also no good. | | You must have right to defend yourself (from humans and from | nonhumans), and mosquitoes and other animal also must have | the right to defend themself (from humans and from | nonhumans). However, this is not to be done by eliminating | populations, or by starting by attacking all of the | animals/plants. | | Animal also might attack other animal/plants for food also | will be needed though, including human and nonhuman. (And | then, if there is an attack then also will be the defense.) | | Humans should stop damaging the environment/world (including | the parts of the environment/world which are harmful to | humans). Many human hopefully should be having less children | too, in order to reduce future population; that is better | than committing suicide or by having a war. (While, some | other animal (and possibly some plants too, but not human (at | this time)) are endangered species and might need to have | more children.) | comonoid wrote: | Water-born(?) insects transfer fertilizing elements from water | back to the land. | fennecfoxen wrote: | Borne, as in, 'carried', derivative of the verb 'to bear' | simcop2387 wrote: | They're food for fish and other animals. That's about all I can | think of that gives them a use of any kind. | saiya-jin wrote: | If you take selfish human-only view, nothing good there. But | there is tons of them and they are important part of food chain | even if they are tiny. | | If we could selectively just eliminate those 2-3 sub-species | that transfer malaria, dengue and say zika or yellow fever from | human perspective the negative impact on environment compared | to positive impact on often weakest and poorest part of mankind | if... well incomparable. Ecosystem would take a hit but I can't | seriously put half a million of human lives yearly, often small | children, against some blip in our environment, which would in | few years balance itself out into new equilibrium (probably | with more insect of some other type taking the place) and | choose insects. | | What I would eliminate outright without any remorse are ticks. | They are not that important in food chain, and are scourge for | both humans and many animals. | hedora wrote: | Apparently there's an approved Lyme disease vaccine in the | US, but they decided there isn't a sufficient market, and | stopped production. | | Now if we could selectively just eliminate those 2-3 sub- | species of bean counters responsible for this sort of | decision... | yyyk wrote: | The story is significantly more complicated: | | https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/lyme-vaccine-history- | ly... | s0rce wrote: | Trials are going for a new one. | brianpan wrote: | If you're interested in how animals use their senses, how about a | whole book about it: https://bookshop.org/books/an-immense-world- | how-animal-sense... | | _An Immense World_ by Ed Yong, who wrote a lot of the great early | Covid articles for The Atlantic. | quercusa wrote: | My family has always debated this question: Do some people get | bitten more by mosquitoes or do they just react more? | latchkey wrote: | Both. | | Over time, you can develop a tolerance to the bites. I | definitely had this happen while living in SE Asia for 4 | years... when I first moved to Vietnam, I had bites all over, | after a while, I stopped reacting to the bites almost entirely. | amelius wrote: | > Humans give off a fragrant cocktail of body odour, heat and | carbon dioxide | | Could an increase in ambient CO2 mess with the mosquito's ability | to locate us? | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | Maybe, but an increase of ambient CO2 would mess with our | ability to breathe properly so it doesn't sound like a great | strategy. | | What I found helps is a fan blowing on you to disrupt the | pockets of CO2 pooling around you as you breathe in your sleep. | jbkkd wrote: | The fan trick works because they can't stabilize well enough | in wind to land on you. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-20 23:00 UTC)