[HN Gopher] I recreated famous album covers with DALL-E
___________________________________________________________________
I recreated famous album covers with DALL-E
Author : lucytalksdata
Score : 141 points
Date : 2022-08-20 18:06 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (lucytalksdata.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (lucytalksdata.com)
| NonNefarious wrote:
| Went to use my invite, and OpenAI demands your PHONE NUMBER.
|
| No excuse for it. Screw that.
| randymy wrote:
| Worth noting that DALL-E automatically "rejects attempts to
| create the likeness of any public figures, including
| celebrities". So, you wouldn't be able to get an image that
| included the 4 Liverpudlians. It does allow you to create fake
| faces. Might be fun to try and recreate Miles Davis Tutu, Aladdin
| Sane, Piano Man.
| cameronh90 wrote:
| My experience was that if you name a celebrity (and the request
| isn't blocked) it quite often generated something that has the
| same general vibe of the target, while also looking entirely
| unlike them.
|
| It reminds me of how TV shows often have a president that
| resembles the current president in superficial ways, while
| being distinct enough that they won't get sued.
|
| I'd be interested to know why this happens.
| [deleted]
| CamperBob2 wrote:
| It will yell at you and threaten your account with termination
| if you try to create anything based on a living person's face,
| from what I can tell.
| phonescreen_man wrote:
| Interestingly related, I just used AI image generation to create
| my EP cover.. first I tried running luciddrains dall e 2 PyTorch
| implementation using the prompt "death by Tetris EP album cover
| 2022" unfortunately I am using a Mac Pro so the gpu was not able
| to work. Then I tried imagen PyTorch implementation and used same
| keyword. This time it was working with the CPU unfortunately 2
| days in we had a power outage so I had something but nothing
| complete. So I fed the generated image into the google dream
| generator and got my album cover!
|
| https://willsimpson.hearnow.com/
| [deleted]
| pjgalbraith wrote:
| I've been recreating the 50 worst heavy metal album art using AI
| as well, currently at 30. Recently I've found Stable Diffusion
| plus DALL-E inpainting to be a good combination.
|
| https://twitter.com/P_Galbraith/status/1560469019605344256
| wodenokoto wrote:
| I'd love to see what it had come up with if simply prompted for
| "Album cover for Nevermind by Nirvana"
| google234123 wrote:
| Is the issue with faces a deliberate choice by the devs?
| nprateem wrote:
| An upvote for whoever can give me a prompt to generate an image
| of someone who's been massaged so much their body has been
| flattened, as if they were made of dough or jelly or something.
|
| I spent ages on this earlier getting nowhere. I'm starting to
| think DALL-E is better if you don't really know what you want and
| you're just fishing for ideas.
| _the_special_ wrote:
| > an image of someone who's been massaged so much their body
| has been flattened, as if they were made of dough or jelly
|
| do you want a realistic looking one? 3d rendered? what do you
| have in mind exactly?
| nprateem wrote:
| Anything really. I tried cartoons, digital art, watercolours,
| pixar style. None worked.
| birdyrooster wrote:
| also what is the PCs budget?
| fzfaa wrote:
| I didn't know that I needed this.
| doerinrw wrote:
| Ok you owe me $3! This is a really hard prompt, and only got
| close-ish with inpainting. Got the base figure with "massaged
| relaxed flattened person, flat, flat, flat, flat, claymation",
| then finally got it to add a not-too-terrifying face with
| "photograph of smiling white woman laying on the ground,
| promotional photography". Final tweaks to erase some artifacts
| (it really didn't want to believe the figure on the left was
| the referenced woman) was "photograph of a wooden floor with a
| white mat and small plants, overhead shot".
|
| DALLE is hard! Curious to see if I can be beat.
|
| https://imgur.com/a/tuyGjxp
| nprateem wrote:
| Ha ha that's much closer than I got, well done! Yeah it's
| difficult. I didn't think of flat, flat, flat.
| teddyh wrote:
| > _The question is, when the music blows up and the artwork
| becomes a signature, like the Rolling Stones ' Tongue & Lips, who
| will own the copyright?_
|
| That's what trademarks are for.
| sieabah wrote:
| If they had bothered to read the license agreement they would
| know whoever generates the art owns the copyright. Since it's a
| pay-for action the copyright is owned by the payee.
|
| So really they generated these and never bothered to do the
| research of their own question.
| teddyh wrote:
| I have, like the article author presumably also does, a
| profund doubt as to whether generated works of this kind can
| be free of any copyright as long as the tool used is itself
| created using myriads of copyrighted works (as training
| data). I certainly do not trust the claims of the tool
| creators; they have all the incentive to ignore any copyright
| problems in order to get a tool which is usable.
|
| And, as the article states:
|
| > _But seriously, how creative and original can you be with
| something that is trained on the works of millions of other
| creators?_
|
| > _To me, it is unclear whether you can actually call these
| works your 'own' at all, because there's always someone
| else's touch on it._
|
| > [...] _users of DALL-E will also never be sure whether they
| are generating something that is 'theirs' or just a knockoff
| of someone else's work._
| hedora wrote:
| OK, so I give you license to use this URL I just generated to
| generate your own stuff.
|
| It's pay for action (send me a penny if you find anything
| worthwhile), and the copyright is owned by the payee:
|
| https://images.google.com/
| meowkit wrote:
| The URL has not been "generated" in the same sense. You are
| retrieving an existing string. The images from google are
| not "generated" in the same sense, they are indexed from
| google's search algorithm.
|
| The generative models, specifically for DALLE here, compute
| pixel unique images. You might say these models index a
| subset of an extremely high dimensional space (pixel count
| * RGB color values) using a query. Traditional search
| engines build an index from nothing and then use a search
| query to find the best matches in a more discrete space.
| teddyh wrote:
| If I made a website where you could type text and get
| images, and I said that your held the copyright to any
| images you got, could you safely act on that assumption?
| What if my web site was simply a proxy for Google image
| search?
| system2 wrote:
| DALL-E still seems very useless. Reminds me of the hype of
| Cardano.
| andreyk wrote:
| I wonder how long the novelty of DALL-E will persist. HN seems to
| upvote anything titled "I did X with DALL-E". This is a fun post,
| but it's not that interesting or surprising. Still worth a look
| don't get me wrong, but personally didn't learn anything new from
| it. (eg recreating the famous pink Floyd cover with "Outline of
| prism on a black background in the middle of scene splits a beam
| of light coming from the left side into rainbow on the right
| side" unsurprisingly worked somewhat well).
| felipelalli wrote:
| I love this kind of bad humor of HN.
| tsimionescu wrote:
| To me the most interesting thing about the article was actually
| just how bad the results are. It's interesting that you picked
| the Dark side of the moon one, as to me that seemed by far the
| worse one - none of the pictures really resembled the simple
| geometry of the original. While I understand why recreating the
| Nevermind cover was difficult, it was surprising that
| recreating such a simple geometric pattern failed so
| spectacularly.
|
| The only cover that really worked from my point of view was the
| Velvet Underground one, and perhaps the Rolling Stones one.
| Abbey Road came closer than what I thought it would, but was
| pretty bad ultimately, and the other three really had nothing
| usable.
| hombre_fatal wrote:
| It will probably get boring the same time HNers stop confusing
| "hmm this isn't that interesting guys" as notable commentary
| that needs to be shared.
| Apocryphon wrote:
| DALL-E generate us some pics of unhappy HN curmudgeons
| paulcole wrote:
| Here ya go:
|
| https://imgur.com/a/kgQtUMf
|
| I don't know why it's got the over-18 warning. It's 100%
| SFW.
| turtleyacht wrote:
| > _A grizzled veteran of the corporate wars: expert
| troubleshooter, code tracer, shell flinger, toolsmith and
| pied piper. Cheerful amid chaos, the cavalry to on-call,
| the invited to skunkworks, tiger teams, red teams._
|
| https://labs.openai.com/s/AkfefTCg9CnFTh6Dh42pRbw5
|
| https://labs.openai.com/s/l6Cy8PA1zDdvKdVdKs47AdLO
| turtleyacht wrote:
| > _Grizzled veteran of the corporate wars, endlessly
| optimistic yet hardened by dint of spectacular,
| catastrophic system failures; a tinkerer; a hacker; an
| astute observer; always prone to imagining the highest
| heights and the most profound lows; blunted against tact;
| sharpened by scouring experience; unforgiving, yet ever
| willing to advise; rightfully paranoid; forced to
| specialize; a stubborn craf_
|
| https://labs.openai.com/s/6oZ1RkvfDccpMpqBWK6HzOPo
| andreyk wrote:
| Well then it will never get boring, will it... Fair enough,
| it's just been striking to see how many of these sort of
| posts have been popping up. Like I said, it's still fun and
| worth a look.
|
| Perhaps as a blogger I am extra salty when relatively low
| effort stuff gets upvoted over things that take a lot of work
| to write (in some cases, those being things I have written).
| But hey, that's life.
| paulcole wrote:
| Low effort stuff can (and often is) better and/or more
| entertaining than high effort stuff.
| andreyk wrote:
| Can't argue with that!
| [deleted]
| DubiousPusher wrote:
| I actually thought there were some interesting things revealed
| here. Particularly interesting to me were the Nevermind and
| Abbey Road results.
|
| Nevermind because it showed this weakness in the model in
| understanding what a dollar bill is. The most novel result
| being the image where the baby's visage appears inside the
| dollar.
|
| Regarding Abbey Road, I found it interesting that the model's
| concept of a public person spans their lifetime evidenced by
| the images where the contemporary images are used. Also
| interesting to me is the model's weakness in understanding
| specific people.
|
| Then again though, I haven't been clicking on every DALL-E post
| so maybe this is old news.
| fifilura wrote:
| For me, what was interesting to see was that it didn't manage
| very well with the Abbey Road question.
|
| I had imagined that some parts of the training data would
| consist of the actual image, and it would find a good match
| for it somewhere deep into it's artificial consciousness.
| TheOtherHobbes wrote:
| It has no concept of The Beatles or Abbey Road or zebra
| crossings or perspective or creative composition in
| photography, so effectively it just mashes up some results
| from an image search.
|
| If it created something very close to the original it would
| be overfitting. So it flails around rather randomly in
| photos-of-Beatles+Zebra+Abbey Road space. The results are
| novel, but they're also monstrous, distorted, and
| unartistic.
| robocat wrote:
| > unartistic
|
| Says who? Maybe you don't like the style, maybe it is
| derivative, but it is definitely artistic, as you allude
| to by saying it is novel. Monstrous and distorted can be
| a style.
|
| "mathematical art, 1924, litography, abstract generative
| art" generates
| https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FanUkREXEAEH6su.jpg -- Can
| you pick the influences? I can't.
|
| "low poly game asset, Cthulhu monster, 2000 video game,
| isometric view" generates
| https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FanTf3IXgAETece.jpg
|
| I thought https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FanNq6sXkAENyU5.jpg
| was really interesting, because the LEGO logo is not a
| 100% faithful reproduction even though the LEGO logo is
| so ubiquitous - showing that the images are generated.
|
| From a longer tweet thread by @fabianstelzer comparing
| DALL-E 2 vs Midjourney vs StableDiffusion: https://thread
| readerapp.com/thread/1561019187451011074.html
| zone411 wrote:
| "DALL-E" in titles is about to be replaced with "Stable
| Diffusion." The beta website is already live but the
| interesting part will be specialized fine-tuned models based on
| public weights. There should be more technical experimentation
| since Stable Diffusion weights are only a few GBs and inference
| can be run on any recent GPU. There might also be more
| controversies because it can create more uncensored images.
|
| Somebody posted a nice comparison between DALL-E 2, Mid
| Journey, and Stable Diffusion:
| https://twitter.com/fabianstelzer/status/1561019187451011074.
| CamperBob2 wrote:
| I dunno, I don't see a lot of examples on that page where
| Stable Diffusion outperformed DALL-E 2.
| [deleted]
| rjtavares wrote:
| Just like images after text, pretty sure once the novelty of
| images ends we'll move to animations, music, movies, computer
| games, and so on.
| Apocryphon wrote:
| For the past few years, I've long considered Hollywood failed
| adaptations to be a non-issue because so long as industrial
| civilization exists, media companies are going to squeeze
| what they can out of IPs. So while _Game of Thrones_ might
| have ended quite poorly, I figure we're only a few decades
| away from a different rights-holder giving it another go.
|
| Thus, I look forward to the AI-generated versions of famous
| works that deepfake the original cast into speaking
| (hopefully) better-written dialogue. Imagine when this
| technology is widespread, fanfic authors rendering their
| interpretation of works with the descendants of DALL-E.
| Everyone gets the dream adaptations and sequels and finales
| they want.
| voltaireodactyl wrote:
| The trouble with this, for me, is that wouldn't such a
| world necessarily mean the end of new actors (not to
| mention new worlds and stories)? After all, why hire
| unknowns when you can stack the cast with the A-listers of
| all time?
|
| And if everyone stacks the cast thusly, there are no
| opportunities for new actors to work with old and be
| mentored + opportunity to simply works since every bit of
| work is what adds up to make a journeyperson.
| notahacker wrote:
| Unless copyright changes a _lot_ , the A-listers are
| going to expect a lot of money for a film with their name
| on the poster and their carefully curated likeness
| throughout, whether they have to turn up to shoot it or
| not.
| voltaireodactyl wrote:
| Totally, but their estates won't be as precious (as we're
| seeing with holograms already). And once a certain
| critical mass is built up, it's built up -- and it's be
| foolish not to use it.
| Apocryphon wrote:
| Still gotta populate the training data
| voltaireodactyl wrote:
| I get that, but I find it hard to see why one would look
| for NEW training data from actors who will never have the
| opportunity to become as seasoned as their forebears,
| when you have 100+ years of filmed historical data (among
| other formats) from which to pull your players?
| xor99 wrote:
| Generative art and by extension DALL-E has a very fast
| attention decay imo. We can't avoid noticing patterns and
| getting bored by them. This makes art and music fun because the
| things that stick and stay interesting JUST DO for some unknown
| reason.
| w0mbat wrote:
| How do you know that the album covers are not part of the corpus
| of images that DALL-E was trained on in the first place?
| machinekob wrote:
| Is i do smth with DALL-E auto top hacker news post i saw like 20
| post like that in past 2 weeks.
| tsimionescu wrote:
| It's interesting that the prompts that would do badly in a Google
| image search also seem to be the ones that make poor prompts.
| Basically, it seems that rather than describing a scene, you have
| to try to give an analogy for some image(s) that it might have in
| its training set - which is why, I believe, "banana in the style
| of Andy Warhol" produces a much higher quality result than
| "Outline of prism on a black background in the middle of scene
| splits a beam of light coming from the left side into rainbow on
| the right side".
| alisonkisk wrote:
| Michelangelo11 wrote:
| Man, after seeing Stable Diffusion's output, DALL-E's looks just
| janky. Like watching a propeller plane after seeing a jet.
|
| Crazy how fast the tech is moving.
| twostorytower wrote:
| DALL-E is capable of very high quality photorealistic images
| with the right prompts.
|
| Here's one I made: https://imgur.com/yAzKkHb
|
| "High detail, macro portrait photo, a handsome Australian man
| with a strong jaw line, blue eyes and brown hair, smiles at the
| camera, set in an outdoor pub at golden hour, shot using a
| ZEISS Supreme Prime lens"
| xwdv wrote:
| Although AI artists will destroy a lot of jobs, it will also
| create demand for new jobs for people who specialize in "paint
| overs" - taking a high concept output created by AI artists and
| touching it up to perfection.
|
| Or perhaps even beyond just a paint over, and into the realm of
| recreating an entire AI artwork but with a human touch to get
| details just right.
|
| Looking forward to it.
| avian wrote:
| > taking a high concept output created by AI artists and
| touching it up to perfection.
|
| When you put it like that, it sounds like a nightmare up side
| down world. It's not AI that's the tool for enhancing human
| creativity. It's humans that are the AI's tool, cleaning up the
| edge cases the AI artist can't handle (yet). It destroys
| creative jobs that give joy to people and creates assembly line
| jobs for them to slog in.
| krapp wrote:
| The purpose of jobs has never been to give people joy, but to
| extract value from their labor as quickly and efficiently as
| possible. Getting any kind of emotional satisfaction from
| one's work is a privilege which arguably points to an
| inefficiency in the market, as that energy is wasted which
| could better be put to productivity.
|
| Artists, programmers and everyone else will have to find
| their joy somewhere other than than selling themselves to a
| corporation, once AI driven markets optimize away any room
| for "joy" and the like, and that's going to be one of the few
| good things about automation. The sooner we break people from
| the Puritan delusion that work defines a person's meaning and
| the value of their expression, the sooner we can once again
| decouple culture from the machinery of capitalism.
| notahacker wrote:
| The humans are also the people that come up with the concept
| in the first place...
|
| Also sounds like an upside down use of the tool, since AI
| generated art really isn't that great at composition once
| you've got over the magic of it being able to respond to the
| prompt at all (but is much better at texture and filling in
| boring details), and the current state of the art AI tools
| can produce images which conform to a human guideline
| sketch...
| 8note wrote:
| The AI is enabling the creativity of laypeople. That's still
| an enhancement, even if they don't have the technique to make
| a polished product
| vanadium1st wrote:
| I am already doing exactly that, and am getting paid for it.
|
| I am a logo artist and I sell pre-made logo designs. Before the
| current AI services I had to come up with visual ideas by
| myself, like a caveman. Now I use the AI to generate a bunch of
| sketches and blurry ideas, and then use my graphic design
| experience to polish them up to a usable level. Here's how it
| looks. https://imgur.com/a/DKTsKdC
|
| I am absolutely sure that a lot of people are doing the same
| right now, just keeping quiet about it.
| xorcist wrote:
| Thank you for that perspective. The linked work is clearly
| the work of a skilled professional.
|
| I am intrigued by the use of AI as a form of creativity
| assist. As someone without any talent for this, the left
| pictures are useless for me, as I don't know how to take them
| into something like the pictures on the right. The point of a
| sketch is to show them to a customer, but if you would show
| these sketches to me, I wouldn't know which one would turn
| out great and which one wouldn't.
|
| Given that, do you feel that the generated sketches are
| useful as a base sketch? I mean, you could probably have used
| any of the existing NFL teams logos and as inspiration,
| instead of letting the software remix them for you.
| avian wrote:
| Here's another spin on this:
|
| Imagine you're a software developer. In the near future, your
| manager wants a feature implemented in your company's app. He
| throws together a short mail with requirements and sends it to
| the prompt engineering department.
|
| The prompt engineers fix a few typos, clean up the grammar and
| pepper a few secret sauce keywords around like "in the style of
| firefox", "in the style of kde". This get thrown into Microsoft
| Copilot 3.0 that barfs out a bunch of code.
|
| Copilot's code has inconsistent indentation, three different
| method naming conventions and some variables named in a foreign
| language. It runs, but crashes if you tap on the lower left
| corner of the screen and allows you to drag the order quantity
| below 0. But that's ok, it's why we employ software engineers
| like you in our company. You will use your years of coding
| experience to touch up AI code to perfection. Better get the
| details just right until Monday all-hands!
|
| Still looking forward to it?
| xwdv wrote:
| sounds to me like I still get paid handsomely
| teddyh wrote:
| The new copyright washing industry is nearly upon us.
| egypturnash wrote:
| As a professional artist, this sounds like hell.
| sgt101 wrote:
| Look, it's trained on these images.
|
| It's really great and cool and all - but it's retrieving things
| that it was trained on.
|
| Show me something original it did.
| Engineering-MD wrote:
| It's hard when it was trained on everything pretty much. That's
| the same problem as with GPT3. In my mind it's still brute
| forcing a solution but instead of endless computation it's
| endless examples
| kgeist wrote:
| Is this "bruteforcing" really different from what our brains
| do? We see thousands, millions of little things (examples)
| every day. Then we combine what we've seen into something
| new. Probably the only difference is that DALLE's training
| was done once while our brains are trained every day for 80+
| years.
| l33tman wrote:
| None of the AI generators retrieve things they were trained on,
| they don't work that way. Everything is original. However our
| definition of "original" might vary a bit, but so it will vary
| for any work of art any human artist do as well, as they are
| also trained on the same images. In the end, a lawsuit and a
| courtroom might have to decide if by chance someone or some AI
| creates a picture used commercially that seems similar to
| someone else's trademark or copyright.
|
| Most of the images I've generated using Dalle 2 feels
| completely original. Just have a look at the reddit r/dalle2
| and I'm pretty sure you'll also decide they're "original
| works".
| dsign wrote:
| It's going to leave all those artists without a job, you just
| wait!!
| cowmix wrote:
| After getting access to the beta, combined with all these HN
| posts -- I've determined DallE2 is neat but no where as great as
| the initial samples made me believe.
| twostorytower wrote:
| It is actually incredibly capable but if you're looking for
| photorealistic images of people, it needs very specific
| directions. I learned a lot from this person creating AI
| portrait photography:
| https://old.reddit.com/r/dalle2/comments/wsi97q/some_of_my_p...
| yummybear wrote:
| I love seeing people experiment with this technology. You can
| feel we're on the cusp of something great - whatever it is, we're
| just not quite there yet.
| soneca wrote:
| Have anyone given a prompt to Dall-e of designing a company
| website and included "make it pop!"?
|
| Maybe the AI will finally get what designers always complained
| about annoying clients.
| doerinrw wrote:
| This isn't really how DALLE works AFAIK but a very fun idea
| nonetheless. Here's a quick more simplified experiment than the
| great work above: "website design mockup.", with and without
| "Make it pop!"
|
| https://imgur.com/a/fy2Uq4x
| codetrotter wrote:
| Prompt:
|
| > Create a website design for a company that sells propane and
| propane accessories. The name of the company is Strickland
| Propane, a local propane dealership. Make it pop.
|
| Results:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/Jv7NJEN.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/5Uiyg1R.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/LL1DC11.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/buv5BvS.png
|
| So there you have it :p
| twic wrote:
| STONIA PRONGAND! I would not buy a propane container which
| looked like that.
| codetrotter wrote:
| Another one.
|
| Prompt:
|
| > Create a website design for ACME Corporation, a company
| which produces a wide array of products that are dangerous,
| unreliable or preposterous. Include customer quotes from a
| dissatisfied Wile E. Coyote prominently on the page. Make it
| pop.
|
| Results:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/WK3QBj9.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/Bghgzjt.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/XLyYx76.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/QTSyFTc.png
| codetrotter wrote:
| More still.
|
| Prompt:
|
| > A website design concept for Apple Inc, in Neumorphism
| design style, showcasing the next generation iPhone Pro
| Max. Make it pop.
|
| Results:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/lU4Mf0X.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/ROMJEjT.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/U4sDheM.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/3bRXCs1.png
|
| Tbh this is probably the worst one yet.. By that I mean,
| the results for this prompt are the least reflective of the
| text in the prompt. Sure it got the iPhones, but it doesn't
| really feel like a website design, and it doesn't feel like
| Neumorphism design style.
| codetrotter wrote:
| More.
|
| Prompt:
|
| > Website design for Weyland-Yutani Corporation. The
| Company was founded in 2099 by the merger of Weyland Corp
| and Yutani Corporation. Weyland-Yutani is primarily a
| technology supplier, manufacturing synthetics, starships
| and computers for a wide range of industrial and commercial
| clients, making them a household name. The website design
| for The Company is mobile first. Make it pop.
|
| Results:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/JyhYK5b.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/J5aPXCH.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/ksqrW09.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/uXBcGa5.png
| soneca wrote:
| Thanks a lot!
|
| Hopefully I am not asking too much, but can you run the
| same prompts _without_ the "make it pop"? So we can learn
| what is "pop"
| codetrotter wrote:
| Dall-E 2 will give varying results even for the same
| prompt. If we want to learn what is "pop" we would have
| to ask it very many times.
|
| But I will give it a try.
|
| First I do three more runs where I give it the same
| prompt that I gave it initially;
|
| > Create a website design for a company that sells
| propane and propane accessories. The name of the company
| is Strickland Propane, a local propane dealership. Make
| it pop.
|
| Results.
|
| Run 1:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/qqOJHXj.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/fao6NMs.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/yH2Lned.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/SiH3hmU.png
|
| Run 2:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/1rppjpR.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/6KiITZn.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/uQTei8M.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/ITacN1P.png
|
| Run 3:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/KAm6Bc9.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/LBBdotk.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/ZPD32oV.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/UkdSiZM.png
|
| And then I do three runs where I give it same prompt, but
| this time _without_ "make it pop";
|
| > Create a website design for a company that sells
| propane and propane accessories. The name of the company
| is Strickland Propane, a local propane dealership.
|
| Results.
|
| Run 1:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/MYIGCcu.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/Iw9JjVf.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/aRaD4ew.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/B7lOV3u.png
|
| Run 2:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/9J2T4Mq.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/058wHEH.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/KVdhYVL.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/sT2U3DM.png
|
| Run 3:
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/ub1EpvY.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/6TkAI1U.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/XnWGaUm.png
|
| * https://i.imgur.com/IL03niN.png
|
| Tbh I don't think we can draw much of a conclusion from
| this..
| soneca wrote:
| I agree, Dall-e doesn't seem to understand what "pop" is
| either. Thanks for the effort in indulging me, though! I
| appreciate!
| bryanrasmussen wrote:
| No Smell the Glove cover, this is a black day for rock and roll!
| [deleted]
| powersnail wrote:
| DALL-E is still highly probabilistic in its judgement. For
| instance, in this article, it keeps putting "fire" in the the
| background on something that is likely to be on fire, rather than
| lighting up the person.
|
| I have a similar experience. In my own experiment, I can't get
| DALL-E to turn off the street lamp at a bus stop in the darkness.
| I've tried "no light", "broken street lamp", etc.; no use. Any
| mention of "street lamp", the scene will include a working street
| lamp.
|
| It's just more probable that a scene with a lamp in the darkness
| must have that lamp providing light, and this is something that
| DALL-E will not break out of.
| 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
| The person is on fire. On top of the fire in the image.
| babyshake wrote:
| I think DALL-E might be programmed to not depict violence,
| which is why it doesn't "like" rendering humans on fire.
| Applejinx wrote:
| Clearly it will have trouble making Rene Magritte paintings
| along those lines, too :)
| whirlwin wrote:
| I have experienced violent or harmful settings to be avoided by
| DALL-E. E.g. setting a person on fire. Same with drowning -
| seems to be impossible/hard to generate
| zaik wrote:
| Violent images likely have not been part of the training data
| for obvious reasons.
| seesaw wrote:
| I gave a prompt about a kid reading the Harry Potter book in
| the bed. It generated a kid wearing Harry Potter glasses
| reading a book. Pretty close, but also quite different from
| what I meant.
| MuffinFlavored wrote:
| Is this "confirmed fixeD"/different in DALL-E 2?
| BrutalCoding wrote:
| Hmm, I haven't tried DALL-E yet but Midjourney mentions that
| negative prompting dont tend to work well. See here:
| https://midjourney.gitbook.io/docs/resource-links/guide-to-p...
|
| They got a solution for that, which is using their --no
| argument. https://midjourney.gitbook.io/docs/imagine-
| parameters#prompt...
|
| I haven't checked if DALL-E has that option too.
|
| Otherwise, you could try other variations like:
|
| street light, light pole, lamp pole, lamppost, street lamp,
| light standard, or lamp standard
|
| I copied that from Wikipedia :)
|
| Best of luck!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-20 23:00 UTC)