[HN Gopher] Whatever Happened to Plasma TVs? ___________________________________________________________________ Whatever Happened to Plasma TVs? Author : bookofjoe Score : 14 points Date : 2022-08-17 17:55 UTC (4 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.howtogeek.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.howtogeek.com) | jerkstate wrote: | Plasma TVs had the best image quality, dynamic range, and viewing | angles until OLED came along. I believe the Panasonic ZT60 was | the last really good one and it was discontinued at the end of | 2013. I still have mine and it's an excellent TV, IMO it looks | better than most of the LED TVs I see at the store (not as good | as the OLEDs though). | satysin wrote: | While I love my OLED TV (LG C8, had it 4 years now) there is one | thing I still preferred with my plasma TVs and that is motion. | OLED is great but the near instant pixel response means for lower | frame rate content such as movies (24p) and most tv shows (25 or | 30p) there is stutter. This isn't visible in many scenes but | anything with panning and it looks, to me, quite jarring. | | This isn't an issue with plasma screens as you get some natural | motion blur with the pixel response times giving a smoother | overall presentation. | | You can _somewhat_ alleviate the stutter on OLEDs using motion | processing on low (or using special "cinema" settings on newer | models) but it isn't perfect as it introduces slight artifacts | which also suck plus the smoothing gives ever-so-slight soap | opera effect that wasn't present on plasma screens. | culopatin wrote: | TLDR: they weren't great to begin with and the technology was not | worth investing into. | technotarek wrote: | TLRTF (too long, read too fast): they were the greatest thing | at the time (especially for cinephiles). Superior contrast, | better viewing angles. Disclosure: Former Pioneer plasma TV | owner | culopatin wrote: | And 5 minutes later oled came out, viewing angles improved, | brightness of 100nits wasn't cutting it, and they were not | worth it. They had a moment. Edit: my point is that there is | no mystery in the article. What happened with them? Nothing. | The technology was only good in that context, like many | others, but it wasn't any holy grail once LCDs improved a | bit. | 2bitencryption wrote: | It was more than a moment. For roughly a decade, your | options were Plasma, LCD, or rear projection (or briefly | hi-def CRT which was pretty wild). | | There was not much overlap of consumer-priced plasma and | OLED panels. | bonzini wrote: | More like 5 years later. | vetinari wrote: | OLEDs at the TV sizes came years after plasma. You could | make it natural upgrade. | | If you had one with 100 nits, you got defective unit. | happyopossum wrote: | FTA: | | Even the best plasma TVs could only reach just over 100 | nits of peak brightness in a 10% window test. | vetinari wrote: | It wasn't that bad (I had one). | | But the article also compares them to _todays_ LCDs with | 1000 nits. LCDs at the time weren 't so bright either, | they were about so bright as plasmas, but unlike plasmas, | they also were gray goo. | bonzini wrote: | Yeah I bought a Panasonic plasma TV in 2006 when I got | married and at the time LCD was in its infancy, very jerky | and barely watchable. The only advantage of LCD at the time | was that plasma was not available in sizes below 38" and was | slightly more expensive. Furniture has changed too since | then; with HD it's unlikely that you'll be anything below 45" | these days. | | I still have it in fact, I don't like how power hungry it is | but it doesn't really matter for the very little time that I | watch TV (which is mostly during the day in the weekend, when | my electricity is self produced solar anyway). That said it's | probably time to get a new OLED TV and I am just waiting for | the day that I will need new furniture. | UIUC_06 wrote: | As someone who had a Pioneer Kuro for a long time (no more), they | did have the reputation of having blacker blacks. | 411111111111111 wrote: | And actual yellows. Especially obvious when the scene includes | fire | DavidPeiffer wrote: | My in-laws bought a "big" plasma TV in the mid 2000's after much | research and deliberation. A few weeks ago they won a new LED TV | and set the plasma aside. | | I'm not sure if it's the sum of money they spent originally or a | real difference, but my mother in law still prefers the plasma | TV. | | Has anyone had similar very positive feelings towards plasma | versus recent new TV's? | bombcar wrote: | If you had a dark room, plasma was highly superior until very | recently. | | The actual pixels made their own light, which meant that if | they were dim or off, they were _off_ - most LED screens until | recently just have a backlight (or a backlight with sections) | and so in a dark room on a black screen you can see the light | leak through. | LeoPanthera wrote: | Plasma has much better black levels than all LCDs. Only OLEDs | are superior. (Or, at least, equal.) | | The downsides of plasma are weight, heat, and screen burn. | (Though OLEDs get screen burn too.) | vetinari wrote: | I had a Panasonic plasma TV at the time and it was great. Way | better picture than any competing LCD at the time. | | But you had to be careful, it didn't like static pictures, they | could burn in, similarly to OLEDs later. If you watched movies, | it was not a problem. If you let some station run 24/7, with | static logo somewhere, that could be a problem. | faeriechangling wrote: | Too expensive, chunky, and power hungry while LCDs kept getting | cheaper and better. | bastawhiz wrote: | Everyone I know they had gotten a plasma TV had it die within | just a couple years. The article says burn-in became less of an | issue, but I'd never seen one that didn't have a burn-in | problem. Even if that problem was solved, the public sentiment | was that they were heavy, expensive, and unreliable. | pvorb wrote: | I bought mine in 2010 and it's still working flawlessly to | this day. It's my family's only TV and it typically sees | about 2 to 4 hours of use per day. | OJFord wrote: | My parents' 2005/6 Panasonic 1080i plasma looks better than | my much more recent Samsung non-OLED LCD, both are fine, | but the plasma is better. Similar usage to yours probably, | more earlier in its life. | christoph wrote: | I've still got a Panasonic plasma from circa 2008, which | still seems absolutely bomb proof. It's only used | occasionally now for some retro (Dreamcast or MisterFPGA | gaming), but the picture, UI, remote and everything about | it still screams of rock solid engineering. It does weigh | an absolute ton - I would guess around 40KG. It's | impossible for one person to lift/move. By comparison, we | have a 65" 4K HDR panel in the living room, which I can | easily lift & move around on my own without breaking a | sweat. The 65" feels nowhere near as well engineered | though. The OS seems to lockup and become unresponsive at | least once a month, which the Panasonic plasma has never | done once in its whole lifetime. | neighbour wrote: | >and power hungry | | This is an important point. My household uses very little power | and when we eventually switched out our old plasma TV after a | decade or so of use, our power bill halved. It's hard to pin it | all on the TV because this is hardly a scientific experiment | but that was the only notable change during that period. | skrrtww wrote: | If you want a TV with amazing picture quality and don't want to | pay a lot, there's nothing better than an old plasma TV. I ended | up with a Panasonic 42" (Viera?) model, one of the later ones | made. It's definitely quite heavy, and after awhile it gets a bit | hot and it probably consumes a lot of power, but it easily | surpasses the picture quality of today's LCD TVs. The only way to | get close to its picture quality is the new fancy OLEDs, etc. | | I also paid $60 for it. Hard to beat. | cameronh90 wrote: | I had a Panasonic Viera during the plasma glory days and I | didn't really like it. | | The worst problem I had with it was that, like all plasmas, I | can see a high frequency flickering on them, especially in my | peripheral vision. | | The second worst problem is they're not very bright. | | I have a LG C1 now and love it (though there are a few minor | issues with that too!). | skrrtww wrote: | I was just trying to figure out what my model is since I've | never experienced the flicker, but I'm not home and it's too | difficult. Looks like Panasonic has used the Viera | designation for a long time and they continue to use it, so | there's probably tons of different variations. | | And yeah, it's not exceedingly bright, but I've only ever | noticed the issue if there's direct sunlight shining on it, | which is pretty rare. | rodgerd wrote: | > don't want to pay a lot | | Don't want to pay a lot _up front_. You 'll pay a lot to run | it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-21 23:00 UTC)