[HN Gopher] I Reached $4k/Mo. But How Many Great Startup Ideas H... ___________________________________________________________________ I Reached $4k/Mo. But How Many Great Startup Ideas Have Died? Author : raunometsa Score : 145 points Date : 2022-08-21 14:22 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (microfounder.com) (TXT) w3m dump (microfounder.com) | abrax3141 wrote: | can someone post a python to a clear and simple How To do a | microstartup from scratch? There must be such a thing. | mkl wrote: | "a python"? | abrax3141 wrote: | Sorry typoo: A pointer. | carom wrote: | I have a lot of variance in how I answer "what are you building?" | for this exact reason. There is what I am building right now and | my vision. Getting people to see the vision is difficult. | | >What are you building? | | 1. An image labeling tool for making open datasets. | | 2. A data-centric training and serving platform. | | 3. I am going to index the physical world in the same way Google | indexes the internet. | scubakid wrote: | Another thing to be cautious about is folks who steer your idea | in a new direction towards a larger TAM (with bigger encumbents) | because they don't see how the current idea can 1000X. | | Sometimes, intentionally going after a market niche can be a good | thing; you don't always have to set your sights on being the next | unicorn. Especially if you're starting out as a solo dev, | building the best product out there for a very specific audience | can be a good strategy that leaves you with enough breathing room | to continue to innovate and grow incrementally. | | That's the general approach I've been taking with | ProjectionLab.com (the personal finance simulator I've been | building on the side for a year now) and thus far, it's been a | fun and modestly fruitful journey. | austinl wrote: | When I talk to friends about what I'm working on, I call it a | "small business", and not a "startup", even though its purely | software and could scale without substantially growing costs. I | think the word "startup" gives the wrong impression--I don't | care about scaling aggressively, I don't want to grow the team, | I don't want to raise outside capital, I'm happy to stay within | the niche. I think this framing tends to generate less pushback | (and focus the conversation more on how I can serve the niche | better). | | I suppose the more precise word for this is a "lifestyle | business", but not as many people are familiar with that term, | and it can have a bit of a different connotation: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifestyle_business | scubakid wrote: | I like the term lifestyle business... but I'd be hesitant to | use it until the business actually supported my lifestyle. | | To acquaintances, I'll often just say "I'm building an app". | Small business is a decent alternative, but a lot of the time | when I use that term I'll feel pressure to clarify that it's | not like.. a lawn mowing business or something. (nothing | against those though!) | jononomo wrote: | On the other hand, I was hired at a startup a few years ago | that had never raised money, had been profitable for a | decade, and was just minting money hand over fist. It was a | tech company, though, so it qualified as a "startup". (It was | EasyBib.com) | jwr wrote: | > Sometimes, intentionally going after a market niche can be a | good thing | | Solo founder of a successful self-funded business here. A | market niche is in my opinion the best place to be. A niche | will be enough for a small business, but might be too small for | the crazed GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH mindset of most companies. | That's good! It means that you won't be competing with | companies burning through VC money and selling at below cost | (as in $19/month B2B SaaS) just to get GROWTH. | | As to the main point of the article -- pretty much _all_ advice | I was given turned out to be wrong. And nearly everything you | read on HN (especially comments) is wrong. Or, more precisely, | it 's advice given by people who are not in your situation, | have never experienced your situation, and likely never will. | This applies to business strategy, but also to technology: your | choices will be influenced by very different factors than those | of people commenting here. You won't care about "industry- | standard practices", fashions, trends, or "will it help my | career" factors. You will care about line count, total cost of | ownership, pace of changes (things that change quickly are | expensive to use), reliability, and the ability to fix things | when something breaks. | | So, my advice would be to make your own choices and take all | advice with a very critical mindset. Including this advice, | obviously :-) | scubakid wrote: | 100%. Or actually maybe I should say 75%... I think you're | spot on that industry veterans, seasoned entrepreneurs, and | assorted commenters (myself included of course), often give | advice that's not quite calibrated to one's specific scenario | and constraints; and sometimes those calibration errors can | lead to conclusions that are 180 degrees off the actual best | path. But at the same time, I would also say that over the | years I've read a lot of great commentary on HN that I'd like | to think has improved my overall mental model of the world, | technology, and business. | | P.S. I also agree that when you hear stories of venture- | backed startups trying similar product ideas but then needing | to pivot due to insufficient growth, that should often be | music to the ears of a solo bootstrapper ;) | danielvaughn wrote: | I'm the founding CTO of a small startup, and I've been trying | to find the business equivalent of your side project. Have you | come across any modern tools for financial forecasting? | telesilla wrote: | Causal, Pry, Finmark etc are good tools. Costs can vary, | you'll need to be clear about your specific goals to stay | price effective. | scubakid wrote: | I've been shown a couple tools geared for startups that some | of my users had been playing around with, but those didn't | look modern or nuanced enough to me. I haven't done a formal | search though, so perhaps there are good things out there I'm | not aware of. Eventually, I'd like to add better support for | business use cases to ProjectionLab; in some ways, it's | already close, but I'll need to carefully think through a few | things like more granular event timing/scheduling and | short/near-term views. | michaelsalim wrote: | What kind of forecasting are you looking for? I'm searching | for something similar to calculate profits & planning | expenses over time. | | If I can't find something that works, this might be something | I'm considering to build myself. | mnembrini wrote: | This seems exactly what you are looking for | https://www.causal.app/ | tnorthcutt wrote: | https://usesummit.com/ | scubakid wrote: | Visual editor seems pretty cool. Can summit do | probabilistic things like monte carlo simulation as well, | or is it scoped to deterministic projection? | wensing wrote: | Creator here. | | You can use fuzzy numbers to get varied output, and if | you want to do MC you can use the API into your model to | call it with whatever distributions you want and | aggregate the output. But no, our UI doesn't natively | support doing a MC sim because the demand is frankly less | than you'd expect. :) | taf2 wrote: | I feel like I heard someone once tell me if you talk about what | you are going to do it reduces the chance you'll actually do | it... so just do it is my approach in general... congrats on | reaching 4k | krm01 wrote: | The only person you should ever ask if they like your startup | idea are potential customers. Share with them the problem you're | tackling and the solution you're building. | | opinions from anyone who is not your potential customer means | literally nothing. Be it positive or negative. Friends, | investors, strangers on the internet. Nobody matters except for | customers. | | When I started a tiny design agency [1], I got the same reaction | from random people (not scalable, why are you only focussing on | B2B etc). We're doing very well luckily and it's a joy working | with customers who love what you are offering. | | [1] http://fairpixels.pro | soperj wrote: | And how do you find these potential customers to ask? | yomkippur wrote: | again and again it is this road to customers that is tough as | a technical founder, who can I hire on upwork that can take | on this task of doing cold out reach? Business development? | How would I structure the compensation (per lead or per hour | or both?) | | so many ideas fail because they cannot get through this | grind. | | I got my customers from a simple tweet that was retweeted. | It's literally rolling dice because when I posted the same | thing years ago there was no response. | | I wonder if successful people just got lucky at rolling dices | early on that puts them in a good mentality position to build | their chips for the bubbles in a poker tournament. | mbesto wrote: | This is basically the one thing that no one ever teaches you | but is arguably the hardest part. I think Steve Blank's | Customer Development Manifesto nails it on the head: https:// | growthorientedsustainableentrepreneurship.files.word... | | This is the reason you often see older (person's age) | entrepreneurs more successful because they've already created | network of trust, or people who have exited multiple | companies...getting intros to potential clients for customer | development is stupidly easy because you're already pre-sold | because of those relationships. | | That being said, I've found in my career that as long as | you're willing to listen to early potential customers most | individuals of any size company are motivated to tell you all | about their issues. Trust me, get someone on the phone and | they'll air all of their dirty laundry. You gain trust with | those early potential customers (and eventually payments) by | being a good listener - replay back what you heard, explain | how you're going to fix it, and then deliver. | | As Steve Blank says "There are no facts inside your building, | so get outside". I'm going to generalize here, but I think | the reason too may technically minded entrepreneurs fail is | because they're simply too introverted to get outside. | krm01 wrote: | Where ever they are. Customers are school teachers? Go to FB | groups where they gather. | | Targeting Marketing execs? Send them an email. | soperj wrote: | I'm doing a meal planning app[0], didn't really think | there'd be a facebook group for that, but lo & behold... | Now I guess i have to get a facebook account :/ | | [0] - www.reciped.io | soperj wrote: | So I've just tried joining a few of these facebook | groups, and a number of them ask specifically if you're | going to try marketing to the group, and have rules | against it. Seems like they've had enough of this tactic. | garrickvanburen wrote: | You can learn a lot by not marketing. | soperj wrote: | That's a good point. I'm not a very good marketer, so | that should be pretty easy haha. | fragmede wrote: | It's less organic, but you _can_ just pay Facebook to run | ads once you 've identified the particular niche. | raunometsa wrote: | What I've often seen with startups on MicroFounder - cold | outreach. | | _" We started with cold outreach to creators, Indie Hackers, | and startup founders, who might be interested in our | product." - Marie from Tally ($24k/mo)_ | | Depending on the product, some communities can be also | helpful, but this probably doesn't work for everything. It | did for Julien who is building NotionForms though (now $11k | MRR): https://microfounder.com/startups/notionforms | daniel-cussen wrote: | That's what Steve Jobs did. Got featured in the Ashton | Kutcher movie. | | When he screams after getting hung up on--that's the 150th | call he made that day. They were rude as shit with him. | That rejection is too lightly touched on. | | And it's like a club for a novat after you ask every girl | to dance and nothing, then go ask every girl to dance | again. Wander. No validation. Get their contempt. | | He didn't add up to shit in the eyes of VCs. Nothing. His | resume was just...and he didn't have _chapitas_ , badges of | eg graduating from the right schools, and then a smooth up- | and-to-the-right career trajectory that had to trace an | exponential curve. Dropouts were nothing then, like you | could open up a photo booth be a hippie or yes be an | inventor--sort of in the late seventies, very limited, not | open to everybody by that point like in the 1920's. | | VCs only got more open-minded by people like Jobs--him more | than absolutely anybody--opening those skulls with the | rippling effect of figurative kicks to the ass. Missing | out. Getting bounced. And for a few with already open | minds, absurd riches. | | Work the club. | nazka wrote: | You do a super neat hero page with the features your product | will have. You say you are working on it but they can | preorder. When they click on preorder with the price you | actually say that no payment is required but you will shoot | them an email when the product will be ready to be tested. | | That way the person saw your product, saw the price, and was | ready to buy it. | PeterisP wrote: | I think that at least for B2B it's key to have someone among | your founding team who either is/was a potential customer | (e.g. has worked for some years in the role&industry who | would be buying this) or personally knows a few such | customers (e.g. because they have worked in a different role | but in the same industry, or in a similar role in a different | industry). | | If you don't have that, you can "import" that knowledge but | that will take a lot of effort and time, and you risk making | some very wrong assumptions early on. And IMHO there are no | shortcuts, to understand your market you have to walk a mile | in their shoes, and if you haven't already done so before | starting the startup, doing that will take out a big chunk of | your runway. So it's not about some specific activities, but | about choosing a project that fits your team or a getting | together a team that fits your project. | DaveExeter wrote: | Two words: survivor bias. | jokoon wrote: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15659076 | | Copy pasted: | | Entrepreneurship is like one of those carnival games where you | throw darts or something. | | Middle class kids can afford one throw. Most miss. A few hit | the target and get a small prize. A very few hit the center | bullseye and get a bigger prize. Rags to riches! The American | Dream lives on. | | Rich kids can afford many throws. If they want to, they can try | over and over and over again until they hit something and feel | good about themselves. Some keep going until they hit the | center bullseye, then they give speeches or write blog posts | about "meritocracy" and the salutary effects of hard work. | | Poor kids aren't visiting the carnival. They're the ones | working it. | robertlagrant wrote: | Don't be silly. Any self-employed plumber is an entrepreneur. | Some of them (many of them) didn't have the cash to get a | degree or the college experience, but their job is highly | entrepreneurial. | katzgrau wrote: | Survivor here, with several failed startups in the past. | Bootstrapped to 100k / mo over 10 years. | | Sufficiently cynical folks will never hear anything I say as | anything other survivor bias. | | My only advice is stay bootstrapped, avoid company-ending risk | like investment, and maintain control of the company. Through | learning and persistence, you'll figure out how to grow it. | | Just remember that the survivors figured out two things: how | not to die (much easier for the Bootstrapped), and how to adapt | to changing conditions. | scubakid wrote: | "not dying" is surprisingly underrated these days :D | robertlagrant wrote: | > Two words: survivor bias. | | Pfft. You're only saying this because you're alive. I want to | hear from dead people. | xmprt wrote: | That's one way to put it. Another way is to say that you had a | good enough execution to stand out from the crowd of all the | other failed startups and the people criticizing your idea | didn't have the same vision as you. The reality is probably | somewhere in the middle. | [deleted] | dangus wrote: | This begs the question: why is the startup now making $4k a | month? | | Is it because of the _idea_ , or is it because of other factors? | Or the idea combined with other factors? Addressable Market? | Marketing savvy? Sales leads? Product execution? Luck/Viral | Posts/First Mover Status? | | I like that this common criticism was brought up in the article: | | > "Doesn't this exist? So many big platforms do it. Very | competitive." | | This is a validator in itself. A small business can see an | existing, competitive market, and that's usually an indicator | that there are a lot of potential customers. If you look at | products like FastMail or Hey they aren't so concerned that 95%+ | of people are fine with the big free email providers, because | literally _everyone_ uses email at some point. | | I think my overall point is this: The "idea" part of a startup is | perhaps one of the _less_ important aspects of it, in my opinion. | Maybe it 's even the _least_ important part of the equation. | raunometsa wrote: | > Is it because of the idea, or is it because of other factors? | | Not because of the idea specifically! But I've seen in my own | life and in the lives of other "microfounders" that if you're | not sure about your startup idea or you don't have that much | momentum going on with it (it's a new idea, you haven't thought | about it much) it's much easier to abandon the idea when you | hear from friends, investors, or just some random people on | Twitter that this idea is not a good one and it probably won't | succeed. | jimkleiber wrote: | I have experienced this many, many, many times, so I'm really | grateful for what you wrote. | | Even if I don't think I'm absorbing other people's doubts | about whether it would work, or even internalizing their | certainty that it won't work, I can be doing that exact thing | outside of my awareness. | | It reminds me of the quote attributed to Muhammad Ali: "I | said I'm the greatest. I said that even before I knew I was." | | How often do I start to doubt my dreams because I'm talking | with someone who doesn't share the same dreams? I've wanted | to build an online platform to train people to be world | leaders, almost like a martial art created by MLK. I can | vividly remember when I said this to one guy, a stranger (!), | who laughed and said, "I don't think you'll be the person to | do that." That has stuck with me for years, a creeping doubt | deep within. | | That's all to say: thank you very much for what you wrote. I | think I needed to read it today. | tomxor wrote: | >> I don't see how this could grow 100x. | | This only means it's not large enough to be investible, that's | not necessarily a problem and doesn't mean it's an inherently | "bad" idea. | | Small ideas can net the individuals that work on them just as | much as working on large ideas... the workforce might be smaller | but once you divide it up it's all the same. If the idea provides | value to the world, you like it, and can grow it without | investment, go for it. | erwinh wrote: | This seems to be the perfect place to reply with a smart remark | that subtly links to the project you are building: | | https://thestackreport.xyz | lakomen wrote: | In my experience "friends" are clueless, especially if they have | ni clue about IT and the possibilities. They only see "virtual | product" and can't imagine you being successful because after all | they aren't and you can't be better than them. I got rid of those | friends. In fact if you have them on board sooner or layer you'll | have trouble with them. Them not working hard enough or not | taking it seriously enough or not only not supporting your vision | but actively fighting it. It's bad for the friendship and bad for | the business. | | After all friends are just people you spent time with more than | with other people, because circumstances or similar view on | things. That was then but life goes on and people change. | scubakid wrote: | Is this a hot take on the risks of going into business with | friends? Or a hot take on... friends in general? | mellosouls wrote: | This is a terrible take on friendship. | Rackedup wrote: | money is so important | black_13 wrote: | bdominy wrote: | I just passed 100 downloads of my app after 6 months and I'm | thrilled with that pace. In that time I've been able to make sure | my backend is solid, and talk with people to gain valuable | insights. My main metric is excitement. If I'm excited to show | people my app and they are excited to try it after we talk, I'm | happy. | bagels wrote: | Did you build the thing from the tweet? A marketplace for | microstartup investment? | raunometsa wrote: | Ah, I suspected that the main image may give a wrong feeling as | it's not really about a microstartup investments right now. But | it fit together with the "no" and "your idea is not good" topic | so I kept it. | | Anyways, I'm still planning to build a part of MicroFounder | towards investments. Probably not legal/technical side but the | marketplace, yes. | | The idea is this: you're a developer and you want to build a | (micro)startup that pays your bills etc. But it can be hard to | find the necessary time and energy to work on it so much that | it will succeed (or it takes just too long). And of course | there's a risk that it will never take off. | | So, you de-risk and sell part of it to an investor. Maybe even | not a % of the company but you agree on a profit share for some | period/amount. | | Because now you have an idea for a startup and - let's say -- | $120k to pay your salary until you reach $10k MRR, or something | like that. You will focus on this startup and see if it works | out or not after a year. | | Another thing is from the point of the investors. Like this | whole MicroAcquire thing. I was considering selling my other | solo startup RemoteHunt.com - some investors said that "hey | take like $120k for 10% but I still need you on the project as | otherwise I have to hire a team etc that takes a lot of money, | time, etc.) | bagels wrote: | I completely understood the context of the tweet in the post, | but was interested if there was traction in the investment | marketplace. | | I've browsed microacquire both as a founder and as an | investor. As an investor, I always come back to the same | thought that I'd just be buying another job, which isn't so | appealing. | holoduke wrote: | What is this? An article spoiled with 4000 in almost every | sentence. As if that amount is attracting someone to start | something. Money is never the motivator. I created several | products on my own. All solo. Some make 30k a month. I never | thought about becoming rich or making this amount or that amount. | I always wanted to create a product people enjoyed. I never used | any so called accelerator tools. Analytics usage very basic. I | spend all my time in development. Frontend , backend , infra | everything. Please don't believe these annoying articles or | products they represent. They sell air. | treelovinhippie wrote: | s1k3 wrote: | I think he's trying to say that you shouldn't let outside | validation or invalidation affect your decision to build a | startup. You as the founder should know (via research, | interviews, insights and industry knowledge) whether your | startup is solving a real problem. Don't let someone with less | expertise than you talk you out of it, or converse, talk you | into it. | lkrubner wrote: | Peter Drucker, perhaps the greatest business guru of the 20th | Century, once remarked that innovators are often disappointed by | the manner in which their innovations become popular. In his 1985 | book, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Drucker relates the story | of Alfred Einhorn, who invented Novocain, which then became | popular with dentists as a local anesthetic. Einhorn held a | contempt for dentistry, since it represented such a small niche | of medicine. He felt that Novocain should be used by surgeons for | all forms of surgery, and so he waged a campaign against the use | of Novocain by dentists. In the end, his innovation was | successful despite him, rather than because of him. According to | Drucker, this pattern, where a product or service is undercut by | the entrepreneur who is trying to promote it, is extremely | common. | | When I first read Drucker's book I found it hard to believe that | an entrepreneur would actively sabotage their own innovation. | However, having now spent several years working with startups, | I've seen that it is, indeed, a common pattern. Many | entrepreneurs starts websites at least in part because they | consider themselves uniquely creative and insightful, and they | want the whole world to see them as they see themselves. The | website they launch proves them wrong: their insights are proven | false, what works in the end is something unexpected. For | instance, in 1992, when Bo Peabody launched Tripod, he was | thinking that the site would offer content aimed at college | students. His idea failed. The company was saved because some of | the programmers at the company had started a side project that | allowed anyone to create their own web pages. This then became | the future of the company. In his book, Lucy or Smart, Peabody | says it is important to be smart enough to know when you are | getting lucky. And then, you have to be willing to accept that | luck. This takes humility. What's needed in an entrepreneur is | emotional resilience, the kind of strength that allows for | openness to the unexpected. | | Twice now I've seen an entrepreneur sabotage their own website | because it became successful for what they felt were the wrong | reasons. This emotional resistance to success is nearly always | inspired by one of two factors: | | 1.) The success is with a small niche. The startup was suppose to | grow till it was larger than Google, and success with a small | niche is, therefore, extremely disappointing. The niche might be | big enough to potentially generate several million in revenue, | but it won't ever be enough to catch up with Google. | | 2.) The success is of a conventional type and, therefore, the | entrepreneur regards it as boring. Perhaps the site was suppose | to pioneer an altogether new style of interaction among humans, | and instead the part of the site that becomes popular is of an | old type - for instance, the blog on the site becomes highly | successful. The entrepreneur is then disappointed, maybe even | angry, to be the owner of a boring success. | | Drucker also emphasized how much self-sabotage tends to trip up | entrepreneurs. I documented a case of this in my own book, How To | Destroy A Tech Startup In Three Easy Steps: | | https://www.amazon.com/Destroy-Tech-Startup-Three-Steps-eboo... | stevesearer wrote: | I have a moderately successful website and know the feeling you | describe. | | One other consideration has been to find other creative outlets | in order to not feel compelled to constantly redesign and | overhaul it into oblivion. | rank0 wrote: | Ideas are cheap. Implementation is the hard part! | vbezhenar wrote: | I have enough experience to implement anything from | microcontrollers and Linux drivers to react webapps and | scalable k8s clusters. I think that I can build most projects | alone and limited only by time, not by skills. I have yet to | find an idea that I would consider worthy spending time on, | despite the fact that I really want to be independent developer | with my own project. Of course I had miriads of ideas but | nothing that I would really trust to become a business, even | something small. I think that it's required to have some | different background to be able to understand what people need | and to be able to reach those people, because anything you | could imagine as a programmer was implemented or nobody will | pay for it. | yCombLinks wrote: | I know several people with very limited tech skills that were | able to at least make something that got them some income | from a tech product. It sounds like you are over filtering | ideas. Throw a few apps or pages out and see if any get | traction after some outreach. Either ads or cold emails, etc. | Like the famous quote saying noone would use dropbox because | you could do it yourself. You probably come up with good | ideas but are like "Why would anyone pay for this?" | [deleted] | candiddevmike wrote: | I'm interested to hear more about your criteria for "worthy | (to spend) time on". My email is in my profile. | randomdata wrote: | In my experience, you can create literally anything and there | will be someone out there who will pay for it. Ideas don't | matter in that respect. | | The hard part is implementing methods and processes that will | capture the early adopters and learn from them so that you | product can grow into something that is appealing to a wider | audience. | | Tech implementation is easy. Business implementation is hard. | robertlagrant wrote: | > Tech implementation is easy. Business implementation is | hard. | | This is what we tell the MBAs so they feel better. Keep up | the good work! | dt3ft wrote: | So microfounder.com is selling a list of ~200 startups operated | by solo founders making $4k/Mo in the process. Huh, you really | can sell everything these days. Inspiring! | [deleted] | cosmodisk wrote: | Recently I've been contemplating about creating something fairly | small, that would eventually bring in. ~100K/year. Many would say | it's not big enough,or so,but it would allow me to build a decent | retirement fund, support many activities that don't cost a | fortune but still require money and so on. | raunometsa wrote: | Yes! This is what my site MicroFounder is exactly about and by | that, I don't mean you should buy the paid membership (you can | build it without paying for any "framework" or community or | whatever). | | I feature new startups built by solo founders on the front page | (for free) to show people that it's possible to build a | profitable internet startup to pay the bills. Or, to keep the | job and build a retirement fund, or travel fund, or whatever. | | I'd say that _every_ developer should think about it. Yes, of | course, work your full time dev job but also start thinking and | then building some small startups. Maybe you won 't reach $10k | MRR in a year (although I have many examples on my site who do) | but still, you're starting to move in this direction. | | And there's this question of "if" - can I succeed? Others are | doing it, but me -- me personally, can I do it? And I'd say of | course, yes, 100% - because it's a matter of making the | decision. | zaroth wrote: | I don't understand why it's just a one time payment? | | If you're doing a micro-startup, you need valuable tools and | insight _today_. You don't care about 12 months from now. You | _certainly_ don't care about $99 twelve months from now... | | If it was $99/yr would it decrease your conversion rate even | a little bit? | | For fun, add a toggle to let people set it to _not_ auto- | renew and Tell HN a month from now how it went? | | Don't actually implement any recurring billing code until 11 | months from now, just save sign-up date and what renewal | preference they selected in a database somewhere? | | Possibly never bother even writing the code to kick out | people who don't pay for their renewal? | | Actually, maybe frame it as a way for micro-startups that | succeed with your help, they will basically have a way to | keep donating $99 a year to a tool that really helped them, | even if they outgrow it? | | Hmmm... pricing is hard. But lifetime service memberships | inevitably become an albatross don't they? | | I can tell you this - a $99 customer has lifetime value of | $99, but a $99/yr customer has lifetime value of $99 * 1.0 / | C. Where C is churn and worst case churn is 1.00 but | realistically will be less than 1.00 (100%). | | In any case, it would be hugely interesting to play with that | pricing model! | Kalium wrote: | There's nothing wrong with a lifestyle business like this. It's | just not something you should think about with the "startup" | business and financial framework. Those are particular tools | that address a particular set of problems. | | There's a major set of difference between a startup and a small | business. | encoderer wrote: | Do it. That would also be an asset worth anywhere from | $100k-500k (depending on the type of business, growth rate, | etc). | scubakid wrote: | Curious to hear more about your idea if you feel like sharing. | Is your 100k ARR target an estimate based on research into the | space or more like a notional goal you'd be content with | reaching? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-21 23:00 UTC)