[HN Gopher] Every action you take is a vote for the type of pers... ___________________________________________________________________ Every action you take is a vote for the type of person you wish to become Author : jeremyeder Score : 184 points Date : 2022-08-23 16:50 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (jeremyeder.com) (TXT) w3m dump (jeremyeder.com) | macspoofing wrote: | Strictly speaking that's not true. Much of our day is not a | series of thought-through decisions, but rather cruise control | without much conscious input. | cammil wrote: | Everything begets itself | paulcole wrote: | This guy's never going to list his "bad" votes lol. | mcguire wrote: | Ok, so let's see here. | | 1. Got a meaningless certificate. Also expanded his "wildly | successful business leaders" network. | | 2. Added people to a project in order to get it completed faster. | (The ghost of Fred Brooks is making it hard to type here now.) | | 3. Proposed re-orging Red Hat engineering. | | 4. Had a meeting. | | 5. Wrote strategy doccies. | | 6. Mentoring. (1 out of 7 isn't bad.) | | 7. Had a meeting about advertising copy. | | I'm afraid I absolutely, positively, do not wish to become | whatever sort of person this is, thank you very much. | hparadiz wrote: | Seriously. How boring. | Jaygles wrote: | Fred Brooks is still around I believe | [deleted] | coding123 wrote: | This reads like post of a teenager bragging about stuff they did | - in a thinly veiled notion that it's about casting votes about | the person they want to be. lol | cortesoft wrote: | No, it reads like a LinkedIn post trying to promote their | personal brand. | swatcoder wrote: | Why is this getting upvoted? | | Even if you find the headline thought provoking, the article puts | no effort into sharing it or exploring it. | | It's just a list of self-enrichment things the OP is proud of | having done lately. This is effectively just resume spam. | tailspin2019 wrote: | Given the sentiment in the comments, the article upvotes are | curious! Perhaps people are just instantly expressing an | opinion on the title alone... | mouzogu wrote: | i would say the past has far greater bearing than the future on | your actions... | | you might want to be confident and outgoing, but your ability to | vote for or express that action, is constrained by your life | experiences and even biological things. | zuzuleinen wrote: | I think I heard a similar quote: "Don't practice what you don't | want to become". | | Sometimes trying to not be stupid is easier than trying to be | smart. Maybe that's another quote I read from somewhere else. | jensgk wrote: | "... The tl;dr of this book is a set of strategies to get 1% | "better" each day..." So after 10 years you will be 1.01^3650 = | 5929448572069177.9 times better than you are today.. Good luck. | birdyrooster wrote: | lmao, the author doesn't explain how we naturally become 1% | worse everyday so 1% daily improvement is just like an | equilibrium point of net 0 improvement. | felizuno wrote: | I've always thought that trying to optimize life is the ultimate | denial. In golf we have these people who spend hours on the range | optimizing their swing but they seldom play a round because of | course their score is never as "optimized" and that make them | feel bad. They can max out point data but never in a way that | changes the aggregate, which based on the invested effort turned | into a feeling of defeat. | | Life is mostly out of your control, if you think that the | solution is to try and assert more control you're the reason the | myth of Sisyphus is popular. | adamdusty wrote: | I think the author might be missing the point of the book. | Nothing on that list anything to do with forming habits. I | suppose the mentoring bullet point could be a habit, but it's bit | vague. | Apocryphon wrote: | Yeah, that's the most annoying thing about this article. It's | fine to make a recap about what he's working on and be all | intentional about it... but it doesn't seem to have anything to | do with _Atomic Habits_ at all. That entire list is projects, | not day-by-day little patterns. | thenerdhead wrote: | TODO: | | - Survive | kodah wrote: | I feel like the author is moralizing something in order to make | it _more gratifying_. | | > firm believer that structure dictates behavior | | So every action you take is a _vote_ and structure dictates your | behavior. This sounds oddly familiar. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | This is insightful. | | Would the author do these things absent the post-hoc | moralizing? | | Maybe we are seeing what it looks like when we concoct | narratives to order our life, and it hits a bit too close to | home. After all, how coincidental is it that the thing that | brings ultimate fulfillment (career) is also the thing that | we've been told all our life to put so much into. | xwdv wrote: | Our lives are not a democracy, they are dictatorships. You don't | have to "become" anything, you simply are what you are at any | given moment, and that's all you'll ever be. Just try not to be | someone that makes other people want to punch you in the mouth. | hsavit1 wrote: | So every single action you take is supposed to be rational and | conscious? This is peak neoliberal thinking | nashashmi wrote: | Every "choice" you make is a vote ... ??? | cortesoft wrote: | Oh man this is such a perfect example of productivity porn. Every | action you take isn't a vote for the type of person you wish to | become, it is a vote taken by the person you are. | | I hate this mindset of "I am constantly working towards becoming | someone else". When do we spend time as the person we are? When | do we enjoy the fruits of our labor? I feel like some people who | take this mindset see their lives as being two distinct phases... | the building/growth phase where you grind and learn and work non | stop, and then a later phase that comes after where you enjoy | what you built. | | I don't think life works like that, and you will burn yourself | out if you do it. Life needs to be built and enjoyed together, | through your whole life. | DiffEq wrote: | I view life as a I do my farm. There is always work to do to | make it produce; there are times of intense work and times | where I enjoy just watching the chickens...not that I don't | enjoy the intense work too; but sometimes I don't as well but | it must be done. I am always looking to do things better and | more efficiently...so over time the farm does produce more, it | does get better, it is not the same farm as it was a year ago. | The change is sometimes fast; sometimes slower but it is always | there. I think the point here is to make the general direction | of change for the better at a pace that is reasonable. | nicbou wrote: | The people who believe in these two-phase mentality rarely end | up retiring early. They don't _know_ how to relax. If you | derive meaning from work and the accumulation of wealth, what | do you do after you reach your happy number? | celim307 wrote: | "Strong opinions held weakly" apply here too. Work hard, but | constantly check in with yourself and ask if your current goals | still make sense and feel good. | | I made a lot of ideals and goals when I was younger and didn't | know myself or the world, and it caused me to chase things that | ultimately didn't bring my happiness. | | I'm much better now loving my harmless, wierd, silly bits, and | working on improving the prickly bits that hurt others around | me and myself, but I'm still learning what those all are and | that's ok. That's growth. | aeternum wrote: | By posting this, you are becoming a person that enjoys life and | is unlikely to get burnt out. | upupandup wrote: | by posting on HN, you are becoming a person that spends time | posting on HN | just_boost_it wrote: | I was thinking something very similar the other day when | someone came to me extolling stoicism as a route to personal | improvement. People need to read a bit of Epicurus or something | to level out. Sure grind when it's time to grind, but make sure | you set aside time to make friends and enjoy your life. In the | end, whether you enjoy yourself or spend your life grinding | away, this one life is all we get. No amount of grinding will | allow you to vote for a second life after this one. | frogpelt wrote: | Your reaction is a somewhat natural push back against the | prevalent idea of selling people on things they don't yet have. | | But you probably need to temper your reaction. Surely you would | expect someone to work on improving themselves. That's what | education is. That's how people develop skills. | | James Clear in Atomic Habits is definitely not just talking | about productivity. He's talking about your health and fitness | and your mental health too. | | Also, why do you have become "someone else" to be a better | version of yourself? | cortesoft wrote: | Yes, I agree with this. I think a good life is finding that | balance; how much of yourself goes into production, how much | into consumption. How much do your push yourself to be | better, and how much do you accept and live with your flaws? | How much do you invest for the future verse consume in the | present? Too much either direction will lead to a bad life. | fatherzine wrote: | The 7th day. | Geee wrote: | That's exactly what the title means, no? If you constantly just | work, you don't become the person you want to be. You don't | become the person who enjoys life. If you are in the spot that | you're not spending time as the person you are, then you'll | probably want to change, and framing every action as a vote is | a pretty good way to think about it. | vhiremath4 wrote: | > Every action you take isn't a vote for the type of person you | wish to become, it is a vote taken by the person you are. | | This is patently false. If you start smoking cigarettes | occasionally and start doing it more, you are becoming more of | a smoker. The actions you take or don't take are the clearest | input to the person you become. It's true that this is also the | person you are, but that distinction seems meaningless if | you're trying to become someone better (whatever better means | to you). | | On a more general note (and this is what you are saying), you | can both prioritize the things you need to do to progress and | the time you need for enjoying yourself and your current life. | These things are only mutually exclusive if you're pushing past | your personal limits and there's a lot of inputs to that | equation and whether that's worth it to each individual. | | So my next question is: why such a strong aversion to people | improving themselves? There is no problem with being | competitive. However competitive you want to be, be. Do it for | yourself. Don't know the author of the post, but people who are | hyper competitive usually aren't telling others to also be | hyper competitive (unless it's a Gary V or someone similar). | From my experience, they're usually just doing their own thing. | notyourwork wrote: | > The actions you take or don't take are the clearest input | to the person you become. | | They are the clearest input to the person you *are*. I agree | with the OP you replied to. | mistermann wrote: | > There is no problem with being competitive. | | What if this is not true without exception? | | > From my experience, they're usually just doing their own | thing. | | The "just" seems off - actions can affect the state of the | system we all live in, and sometimes these effects are | negative. | cpursley wrote: | > why such a strong aversion to people improving themselves | | crab bucket mentality | rukuu001 wrote: | In case people aren't familiar with crab bucket mentality | (I wasn't) - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_mentality | Apocryphon wrote: | These trends shift back and forth. A few years ago, | certainly a decade ago, everyone was into productivity porn | and life hacks and optimizing one's lives. Right now people | are just generally burned out after the last couple of | years. | wizofaus wrote: | > There is no problem with being competitive. | | I'd say there definitely is if you do everything in life that | way. You seem to be assuming it's possible to be meaningful | competitive without it affecting how you interact with other | people. But competitive-minded people often make it | abundantly clear to those around them how much they're | "winning" and even make it a point of pride that others | aren't doing so well. So yes, there definitely can be | problems with being competitive. But our competitive instinct | can be positive motivating force - we've all pushed ourselves | that little harder knowing the reward will be a higher spot | on the results table. How to combine that with not being an | asshole about it seems to be the challenge. | darkerside wrote: | Salience bias. You don't notice the competitive people who | aren't assholes, but there are plenty of them. Some of them | are even humble. | P5fRxh5kUvp2th wrote: | One wonders if you created this post to be come a better | typist. | karaterobot wrote: | > This is patently false. If you start smoking cigarettes | occasionally and start doing it more, you are becoming more | of a smoker. The actions you take or don't take are the | clearest input to the person you become. It's true that this | is also the person you are, but that distinction seems | meaningless if you're trying to become someone better | (whatever better means to you). | | I don't know about 'patently false': it's literally true. The | things you do reflect who you are when you do them, the | person you are becoming is a hypothetical who does not exist. | For example, I am the one splitting hairs in this comment, | not the future me who wants to be named world's biggest | pedant. | | What your example points out is someone who is doing more of | something _over time_. A smoker who smokes more is a trend, | not an action. | stonemetal12 wrote: | It is a false dichotomy. Every action you take today is a | vote by the you who exists right now. Every action you take | today does build the history of the person you are | tomorrow. It is not one or the other, but both. | karaterobot wrote: | Describing any action as a vote about your future | identity is a way of thinking about the world. It makes | sense within the particular framework this article is | presenting, but it is not a universally held belief, and | it's not self-evidently true. It's a metaphor. | | Here's an example: if you choose not a rob a bank 10,000 | times, that's 10,000 votes for not being a bank robber. | Then if you choose to rob a bank just one time, you're | suddenly a bank robber. 10,000 to 1, the number of votes | doesn't actually matter. | | That's a silly example, but what it means is that your | identity isn't always the result of a bunch of small | decisions. Often there's just one "vote", and that is the | decision you make, the action you take. | | One objection to this may be "but being a bank robber | isn't who you _are_ , it's just something you _did_. " If | so, I wonder how to square that with the example of | becoming more of a smoker by smoking more cigarettes? Can | I vote not to be a smoker, even if I smoke a lot of | cigarettes? Or to be less of a smoker by smoking more | cigarettes? That doesn't make sense to me. | | Anyway, hope this clarifies my objection: "actions are | votes about who you will become" is a _metaphorical_ | explanation, not a literal one, so that comment way | upthread is not patently false in my opinion, even if it | 's arguable. | s1artibartfast wrote: | >It's true that this is also the person you are, but that | distinction seems meaningless if you're trying to become | someone better (whatever better means to you) | | Do, or do not. There is no try. | | This is a meaningful distinction, even if it is a nuanced | one. There's a profound difference between focusing on who | you want to be tomorrow versus who you want to be today. | | One mindset takes you out of the present and is an act of | self denial. The other embraces the present and affirms | positive self identity. | mikkergp wrote: | If the only reason a person is having a conversation with me | is so they can be a better conversationalist tomorrow, than | they can fuck off. I worked out today, I ate healthy today, I | worked hard and did chores for my family, and praticed my art | forms and I did it all for today. Who knows what tomorrow | will bring. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with | planning for tomorrow, but there is a problem with seeing | "every action you take" that way. | | Why do you sense this as a strong aversion to people | improving themselves, and not a strong aversion to people | trying to guilt people into seeing only one mindset to self | improvement? | vhiremath4 wrote: | I strongly agree with this. I think you really have to | begin to love the journey if you want to improve at | something with slow incremental gains over time. But | everyone has to start somewhere, and, honestly speaking, | most people don't want to work out. Most people don't want | to work hard. Or eat healthy. You have to force yourself | initially to see that this is going to lead to you loving | to do these things you currently hate. | dchuk wrote: | I think the point is that if you aren't mindful and deliberate | with your actions, you'll descend into behaving according to | habits and desires instead of what is in the best interest of | your future self. | | Without being mindful, you'll just have another handful of | chips instead of remembering you're trying to be not fat. | | Without being mindful, you'll watch another Youtube video | instead of doing something on your todo list. | | Without being mindful, you'll jerk off instead of reading a | book or interacting with another human being. | | It's not that doing any of the above is inherently bad in | isolation, it's that if you aren't mindful in the aggregate and | just default to impulse, you'll find yourself drifting much | farther from what you think you will eventually become than you | otherwise realize. | | We live in a world where distraction and dopamine hits are so | accessible (sometimes even out of our control) vs even just 50 | years ago, so we find ourselves needing to be more deliberate | in our actions. | s1artibartfast wrote: | I think you made a false dichotomy between thinking of the | future and mindless indulgence. | | You can be mindful of who you are and what you want now. | | A life of always suffering for tomorrow is arguably as bad as | a life of mindless indulgence. | | You can get to the end without ever enjoying it. | | It is better to not want chips than always want chips and | restrain yourself. | | It is better to enjoy exercise than suffer through it. | swader999 wrote: | Being born well helps too. | tailspin2019 wrote: | I don't have a comment on the article. But if I was the author, | it would be pretty rough reading the comments here. | | I guess it's worth remembering that for every blog post out there | that perhaps we don't like, there are a million that are never | written in the first place for fear of being exposed to | criticism. | | So maybe there is virtue in just having the courage to put | yourself out there and invite the world to cast their judgement | on you, if nothing else! | mattgreenrocks wrote: | I don't disagree with some of the comments here, but they fall | into the "doesn't need to be said" bucket for me. | | Yeah, I can't say I've done as much as this guy, but the quote | is helpful in framing small actions when building toward | habits. | Apocryphon wrote: | The author was right and brave to put himself out there and | express what he wants. (Even if the intention behind the post | might have been to create vapid SEO content for the sake of | furthering his Brand and to grow his Clout.) But others are | right to criticize the blog post for its failings, as per their | opinions. Everyone is just doing the best they can. | tailspin2019 wrote: | > Everyone is just doing the best they can. | | I can get behind that :) | UncleEntity wrote: | > So maybe there is virtue in just having the courage to put | yourself out there and invite the world to cast their judgement | on you, if nothing else! | | Poor guy...I'm voting to take a nap and not join in on the dog | pile. | bluetomcat wrote: | If anyone is familiar with the quoted book, how does one quantify | and measure the amount of "betterment", or even define static | "goodness"? Life is a complex affair on many simultaneous tracks. | Prioritising one track often impedes the performance on another | track in the long run. If you define the "perfect state" of | yourself as having gone through thousands of tickets, bullet | lists or redundant self-help books, you will certainly suffer in | other areas. | number6 wrote: | It's about atomic habits. Like do it 1% better and you will be | 100% better in 100 Days. Expand all areas and so one. SMART | Goals. He does also sell a journal to track everything, so this | is this. | | I liked the book and the mindset. Reminded me of Arete [0]. But | for me it's more like an ideal and a reminder. A bit of fake it | till you make it and what would a person who already obtained | the goal do or did do in my stead. | | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arete | edmcnulty101 wrote: | I hate philosophies like this. It acts like humans are machines | that need to be doing things. | | I like to relax and binge netflix occasionally to decompress but | that doesn't mean I'm voting for myself to become a lazy bum. | | I also like to play music but I don't want to become a working | musician. | | Life is more than ACTIONS there's also experiences and things you | enjoy that have nothing to do with future planning. | ravenstine wrote: | It's not entirely wrong, but yeah, we aren't always making | highly conscious decisions. There should be no shame in living | a low-key yet morally integral existence and not always being | intentional with every single action we take. | | My contention with that philosophy is similar to that of all | the messaging we get on social media about success and how our | lives are supposed to be. No, I don't travel and dine out as | much as other people, and perhaps I'm not as conventionally | successful as most others in my cohort, but I have enough life | experience to inform me that I am both content and not really | "missing out" on things like others might. To "live like you'll | die tomorrow" seems stressful and unsustainable to me. I much | prefer the chill feeling of knowing that I'll wake up with a | new day and that I don't necessarily need to be hustling or | achieving to be a human. | GauntletWizard wrote: | I think you're interpreting the advice overly agressively. You | can take it as chill advice in chill situations. | | It's okay to want to be the kind of person who enjoys a show | and watches it enthusiastically. It's great to be the kind of | person who relaxes and takes care of themselves. It's wonderful | to want to be musical without pushing yourself to do so | commercially. | | Take actions to be the kind of person who enjoys being you. | ProAm wrote: | These blog posts are such low effort too it makes me cringe. | | 1) Read $popular_book | | 2) Have it tell you what to do | | 3) Blog about chapter, quote, section of said $popular_book | | 4) Keep you in the loop for SV/VC/Hacker/Founder-sphere because | if you don't have a presence your startup doesnt matter. | | I'm overly generalizing a bit, and I think the blogger probably | had good intentions (i.e. me overreacting) but I feel like | these types of posts are more virtue signaling and a waste of | time vs smart people wanting an online book club. | mcbutterbunz wrote: | Having a mechanism to express your thoughts, whether publicly | or privately, can be beneficial to the learning process. You | try to express your ideas to others and see if you really | understand it, sort of like the Feynman technique. | | Beyond that, if its cringe to you or not worth your time, | just ignore it and move on. Just because it's not worth your | time doesn't mean its not worth the time of the author. | ProAm wrote: | I totally agree. Im not saying he shouldn't blog as for its | good personal expression, similar to a diary. Just | surprised to see it on HN as for it seems more that the | author is someone seeking validation vs discussion. | robcohen wrote: | I don't see these as mutually exclusive philosophies. You can | choose to make an action out of relaxing by voting to not be a | strung-out stressed person that is pressured to do things all | the time. That person isn't fun at parties. You can vote to de- | stress for a few hours or a whole day on occasion. | | I personally find this philosophy useful and follow it myself. | I intentionally choose what I spend my time on. I make a list | of priorities, then I allocate time to those priorities on a | spreadsheet. If I run out of time, I drop priorities and make | more time. I factor in social time where I can choose to go out | or stay in, depending on how I am feeling that day. | | What I don't appreciate it the philosophy that most people seem | to embrace which is "externalize everything but my job and what | feels good". I feel like it's important to hone a variety of | skills, and sometimes doing that isn't exactly fun. I think | it's more justifiable to delegate once you know how to do a job | well. There are exceptions, but there really are not a lot of | them. | Eupraxias wrote: | This sentiment has always made it through my brains like this: | | "you are what you do" | | ..which evokes the deepest ontological question - does being | doing? | neuroma wrote: | Honestly thought this was going to be about making small | momentary alignments to love, courage, presence, gratitude.... | | Nope! Big career fireworks instead. Props to this guy anyway, | sounds like he's enjoying whatever he's doing. | nicbou wrote: | This kind of content is better suited for LinkedIn. | | I'm not a machine. I need rest and recreation to function | properly. I sometimes get sick or sleep poorly. I sometimes get | bursts of inspiration. There's no telling what condition I'll be | working with on a given day. | | But perhaps you're right. Perhaps I'm casting my vote against | being some sigma grindset, 4 AM cold showers, audiobooks at 3X | speed kind of guy. The other guy seems more chill. | DiggyJohnson wrote: | Why would this perspective not be compatible with rest and | relaxation? | p_j_w wrote: | Did you see the list of what the guy did? At no point did he | include rest and relaxation. He's clearly fetishizing | productivity. | chasd00 wrote: | why don't you take action to get some rest. Take action to do | something fun for recreation. Vote by action to be happier. | They key is just take action that gets you closer to who you | want to be. | nicbou wrote: | I'm sick and my body needs rest | pen2l wrote: | Woah I didn't know doing audiobooks at 3X was perceived as some | kind of a virtue. | | I do it out of pure laziness. Particularly, all youtube things | (with 'Video Speed Controller ' extension) at 2 or 3x because I | just can't _can 't can't_ put up with normal speed. | nicbou wrote: | It's part of the sigma grindset meme. A while ago Business | Insider ran short videos about entrepreneur routines and it | was a montage of this sort of nonsense. Then you look back | and realise that all the guy did was answer two emails. It | was derided and parodied. | safety1st wrote: | It's a gross post that wasn't worth the read. It's just a guy | reciting his latest resume updates. | | Not sure if it was posted in earnest, but either way the dude | is trying too hard. Hard work is a virtue, a bullet list of | your own isn't. | pineconewarrior wrote: | You're voting for the You that takes care of themself. Good! | johnchristopher wrote: | What are these votes author says he's casting ? | braingenious wrote: | I have a relative that has fallen into several pyramid schemes | and is perennially addicted to so-called "self help" books, | spending hundreds of dollars on them per month, every month, for | about two decades. | | I won't mince words. It is an embarrassing addiction. I often | feel secondhand embarrassment when I interact with them. The | level of naivete required is astronomical, but somehow there it | is. | | It is also one of the funniest phenomenons to see on this | website, because it's not just acceptable here, or even just | popular here, but apparently _a critical part of the culture_ to | the extent that weird articles about dealing with ~Being super | smart~ or ~Optimizing your life~ make it to the front page on a | nearly daily basis, beating hundreds of submissions every day. | | I am happy to see that people are being critical of it today | though! | DubiousPusher wrote: | Unchained of any social responsibility, void of compulsory | passions, maybe. I'm not going to run anyone down for the way | they organize their life and I do take on conscious actions to | form habits. However, these kinds of aphorisms do give me the | willies a bit. | sdoering wrote: | Exactly this. I just can't deal with this (I call it) | SEOfication of the world. | | Content like this always rubs me the wrong way. Not genuinely | written because it must be said, because of a deeply felt need | to express oneself. But to present oneself in a very specific | but essentially superfluous and artificial way. | | Maybe it is me being more and more disillusioned by all this | kind of superficial content. Maybe it is just me having a | different opinion was I could regard as deep content. | robotnikman wrote: | I feel the same way. It seems like a good chunk of content | online is published just for an ultimately superficial | purpose. One just has to take a quick look at LinkedIn to see | many examples, but by no means is it limited to just there. | Errancer wrote: | I really dislike this type of thinking insisting that everything | we do has some importance to it. I used to think like this in | moral terms, my every action has consequences and I should be | mindful of those consequences. And if anyone watched "The Good | Place" then they know it is not a good way to live. I am | paraphrasing but microoptimalisation is the root of all evil. I | find it much better to just get a good understanding of what I | wish to be and set a long time goals around it (Like a decade or | lifetime long). Then every now and then I can asses if it is | working or not. Since life is not a race and I am not competing | with anyone I can settle for slow progression towards the good. I | am the judge, the executioner and the audience of my life and | therefore every aspect can be adjusted independently. | patientplatypus wrote: | [deleted] | AndrewKemendo wrote: | Humans do not have the capacity to be perfectly consistent with | their long term goals. Therefore, as you take actions through | life you are also voting for the person you don't want to be | simply through failure or randomness. | | Luckily there is a REPL for human behavior: feedback from the | environment that the decision you made did or did not support | your long term goals | | This REPL allows you to iterate toward increasing the percentage | of your effort that goes to long term goals. | | This assumes you have measurable long term goals. | caycep wrote: | For some reason this reminds me of that whole deep reinforcement | learning / "policy" algorithms | Gooblebrai wrote: | If someone wants to read some science fiction related to this | topic, I recommend: "Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom" by Ted | Chiang | 0xbadcafebee wrote: | I ate cereal for breakfast this morning. I'm sure I could analyze | this decision, judge my future self, and change what/when/how I | eat. But I'm not interested in that much introspection or self | improvement. I'm just trying to get through the day. | LanternLight83 wrote: | People who practice intermittent fasting often report that | their body's hormonal rhythms adjust to their eating habits | over time, so it's only by skipping the meal and bearing | through the hungar that one can become the type of person who | simply doesn't think to eat before 10-12 (leaving out a lot of | debated science, personal variance, and assorted nuances for | the sake of time and contrarianism). | | Edit: Ah well, you've edited your comment now, can't argue with | just getting through the day -\\_(tsu)_/- | synu wrote: | I find it a little strange that it seems like so many people are | working so hard, all the time, to run away from the person they | are today. I'm ambitious as anyone, but some of this stuff is too | much. | mb_72 wrote: | No mention of 'voting' to spend time with friends or family, | getting outdoors, giving to charity with one's time or money, | painting or trying to learn how to? Perhaps the author does these | things or perhaps their context was restricted to work, but this | kind of life seems a little hollow to me. | anigbrowl wrote: | It's great when a person finds something that works for them, but | evangelists are annoying at best and creepy at worst. | dudul wrote: | Go touch some grass | tspike wrote: | Thanks for the reminder.. I vote to stop reading bland, boring | tech blogs for today. | glitchc wrote: | Seems like a new form of humble-brag to me. | imwillofficial wrote: | This post makes me want to watch The Hustle again until I level | up my life. https://youtu.be/_o7qjN3KF8U | causi wrote: | _The tl;dr of this book is a set of strategies to get 1% "better" | each day._ | | Yeah, you can keep that. I'm focused on getting 1% happier each | day. | chrsig wrote: | Yeah. I've personally been on a mission to throw 'bad', | 'worse', 'good', 'better', and words to those effects out the | window. They're meaningless and lazy at best. They need to be | defined in every context, so it's easier to just skip to saying | the definition. | | At worst, they sound incredibly judgmental, presumptive, or | pushy. It irks me to no end when others try to decide what | _good_ is on my behalf. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-23 23:00 UTC)