[HN Gopher] DuckDuckGo email protection beta now open ___________________________________________________________________ DuckDuckGo email protection beta now open Author : TangerineDream Score : 203 points Date : 2022-08-25 12:16 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (spreadprivacy.com) (TXT) w3m dump (spreadprivacy.com) | TopGreg wrote: | milkoolong wrote: | I was able to generate a random private duck address | (o8oyr2f8@duck.com) that's connected to my name@duck.com which | then forwards to my personal gmail. I can change the forwarding | address too which helps when I move from gmail to a private-er | service. Please send me your best educational spams at the | address above. It will self-destruct shortly when I generate a | new private address. Really cool to see more offerings like | these. | shadowgovt wrote: | This is a great idea, but it's going to take nearly zero time for | companies to decide not to accept private duck addresses for | business purposes. | | DDG is signing themselves up for a hard challenge, though I think | they're up to it. Once you offer a service like this, you take | upon yourself the burden of maximizing the outbound signal-noise | ratio for emails, or you run the risk that other email providers | identify your node as damaged and route around it. So they'll | have to be on top of uses of their service for spam and | aggressively police and kill those accounts. I'm excited to see | what special sauce they're bringing to the field in this space. | chenshuiluke wrote: | Is there a way to integrate something like this with Bitwarden? | Vinnl wrote: | Bitwarden does integrate with a couple of similar services: | https://bitwarden.com/blog/add-privacy-and-security-using-em... | | (Disclosure: I work on one of them, Firefox Relay.) | lijogdfljk wrote: | I have this with FastMail - it's really cool. Even has 1Password | integration to automatically create the emails. | Osmium wrote: | Bystander impression from other comments I've read on DuckDuckGo | posts recently: they have good intentions but behind-the-scenes | are a bit less rigorous on privacy than would be ideal. Is this | an accurate impression from anyone who knows more? | | For example, see discussion in this thread[0]. Even though the | article itself seemed misleading, many commenters raised some | good points. | | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31490515 | monetus wrote: | They have pushed that contract to the limit thankfully. You can | load up Firefox with ad blockers and then compare and contrast | with their browser. They do as well as allowed, and have extra | value adds. More well intentioned than brave imo. | mike-cardwell wrote: | Just tested this with https://www.emailprivacytester.com | | Removed three trackers, but left several in place. | tuckerman wrote: | I've eventually settled on using fastmail and their masked email | feature which can create addresses on my own domain for this. I | love DDG and appreciate anyone helping in this space to make | email more manageable but I assume these addresses will be | quickly blocked from many services just like the firefox relay | addresses are. | | I wish there was a way for these relay services to be effective | since they are much, much easier to get someone to use than | telling them to just up and move from gmail to fastmail. | drchiu wrote: | I've heard of fastmail in years past. Your comment got me | curious again about it. How's the deliverability of their | service? I guess with anything "email related", the hardest | part is making sure that the emails I send actually ends up | where I intend to go. (Goes without saying, outbound emails are | NOT spam but legitimate emails.) | cxr wrote: | I was a paid Fastmail user for something like 3 or 4 years, | largely as a consequence of the good standing they seemed to | have among the audience on HN. Deliverability (and uptime) | with Fastmail is excellent. | | However, during that time I filed two support tickets and | neither left me feeling particularly warm and fuzzy about the | faces behind the business that I was pledging my annual | subscription to. The response in the latter instance in fact | was so bad that it's what motivated me to look elsewhere | rather than renew. I was prepared to pay more just to know | that I wasn't doing business with bullies/jerks. I ended up | going with a smaller provider. Without checking, my annual | expenses are actually around half as much, IIRC. | blibble wrote: | could you be a bit more specific? | | I've been using them for 18 months and the support has been | not perfect, but 100x that of e.g. Amazon support chat | throwaway290 wrote: | Are you worried that a smaller provider may be less | reliable in the long run, or you are already prepared to | just switch your domain again if it becomes an issue? If | you are ok sharing it, what is the provider? | | I really wanted to switch to Fastmail a few years back but | 1) its registration page was intermittently down for me and | 2) when I caught it during uptime, it sent me to phone SMS | verification which I found invasive given it is a paid | service. I was ready to give it a chance anyway, but no SMS | got delivered to me in the end. | cxr wrote: | "Smaller" in this case just means smaller, not newer. | They've been in business for a long time, and I expect | them to be around for a while. The downsides tend to be | in the opposite direction: they're old, and their | webmail/account management interface until recently | showed its age. This was not a problem in my book; I | don't use webmail. The greater concern with mail | providers involves the risk that they would pull | something like what Gmail did and withdraw from offering | standards-based email (i.e. no more IMAP). In that | respect, what the sluggishness to get with the trends | really means is a lower risk rate of churn, and I'm happy | with that. | | Your profile doesn't list a way to contact you privately. | | As of last year, it's supposed to be one of the services | listed on <https://www.fsf.org/resources/webmail- | systems>, but it's not. I just reached out to Greg | Farough to follow up on why. | throwaway290 wrote: | Thanks, that FSF link might be good enough. (I don't want | to identify this account and don't immediately know how | to set up an anonymous throwaway email) | | By the way, according to my Mail's connection doctor on | mac, it appears to use IMAP when talking to gmail as of | now. I wasn't aware Google was phasing out proper IMAP | support, my concern was more about them being known to | ban accounts with little recourse. | tuckerman wrote: | I've never had any deliverability issues with Fastmail and am | happy with their uptime. I originally used google apps (aka | gsuite/workspaces these days) but had enough headaches using | it for personal email that I switched and the quality of | service feels the same to me. | kmfrk wrote: | Fastmail is awesome. I'd combine DDG Email with their Masked | Email in the cases where you want to strip image tracking and | opaque tracking urls from your links. | milkoolong wrote: | I use tutanota and the alias works. But didn't know masked | emails were offered by services like fastmail! | cscheid wrote: | (I've been a happy paying customer of Fastmail for _years_ and | I didn't know about masked email. Thank you!) | tuckerman wrote: | Just in case you happen to be a 1Password user as well, there | is an integration where they can auto-generate masked emails | for you: https://support.1password.com/fastmail/ It makes it | very convenient! | alexchro93 wrote: | Auto-generated masked emails using Fastmail and 1Password | has worked very well for me when I'm using Firefox, with | the 1Password extension installed, on my laptop. | | I can't for the life of me, however, figure out how to get | 1Password to auto-gen a masked email from their iPhone app | or desktop app. | | Is this possible? | muhammadusman wrote: | You can also use a custom domain (and/or anything else | Fastmail lets you choose), this way you can put all the | randomly generated emails coming to you in a single folder | (as a rule). | yubiox wrote: | You need to put your real address as the from address in replies, | not the duck address. DuckDG then strips out the real one and | replaces it with the duck one, it seems. | TopGreg wrote: | datavirtue wrote: | No dots or underscores allowed? | neon_electro wrote: | Probably on purpose to avoid firstnamelastname@, | firstname.lastname@, and firstname_lastname@ variations being | abused. | encryptluks2 wrote: | Just a note... an email anonymous relay that lets you use custom | domains is a much better alternative if you ever plan on | migrating away. SimpleLogin is open source and allows you to | export the information so that if their service ever goes offline | you have a backup and can recover your aliases. | Night_Thastus wrote: | Could someone explain a bit about where this fits in? | | Is this an e-mail provider? A client? Something else? | | If I have X Provider and I access it using Y client (ie, | Thunderbird), what exactly does this add/replace/enhance? Where | does "Relay" fit in since some people here mention it? | jabroni_salad wrote: | It looks like it is just a forwarder, so it doesn't replace | your existing mail provider. | CharlesW wrote: | It's a privacy-focused "email forwarding" service, which I | think is synonymous with "email routing" service. | | Competitors would include Cloudflare1 and Apple2. | | 1 https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-email-routing/ | | 2 https://support.apple.com/guide/icloud/what-you-can-do- | with-... | Night_Thastus wrote: | So I could set up a new e-mail address, have it forward to my | existing e-mail address, and DDG does some filtering/spam | protection before it does the forward? | [deleted] | NaturalPhallacy wrote: | DDG declared themselves part of the Ministry Of Truth earlier | this year and I jumped ship immediately to brave search: | https://twitter.com/yegg/status/1501716484761997318 | | I will have nothing to do with any of their products and no | longer recommend them to others. | yegg wrote: | I (the author of the tweet you referenced) commented on this | subject on this thread here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32597340. We didn't do | that, e.g., we actually did not (and do not) censor anything | for political purposes, we don't do any URL-level fact | checking, etc. | NaturalPhallacy wrote: | No one gets to be the decision maker on what is | misinformation and what isn't. Nobody is the exception to | that rule. No matter how good faith and good their intentions | are. It's not _how_ you 're doing it, it's that you're trying | to do it at all that is the problem. | cedilla wrote: | I refuse to believe that anyone who thinks that 1984's main | takeaway is that there is no objective truth and that any | attempt to stand against propaganda is a greater crime than the | propaganda lies themselves has actually read it. | | The problem with minitru is that 2 plus 2 does not, in fact, | equal 5. It's not that saying one fact is true is somehow | immoral. | NaturalPhallacy wrote: | > _I refuse to believe that anyone who thinks that 1984 's | main takeaway is that there is no objective truth and that | any attempt to stand against propaganda is a greater crime | than the propaganda lies themselves has actually read it._ | | The issue has never been about truth itself. It's always been | that you should allow no single entity to be the arbiter of | what is the truth, because everyone has an agenda, and | organizations have multiple people with multiple agendas. | Terretta wrote: | Speaking of truth, what prompted you to call yourself akin to a | natural phallus on HN? | NaturalPhallacy wrote: | I don't like the naturalistic fallacy (nor any others) that | people use to justify things as being Good(tm). And dicks are | objectively* funny so "naturalistic phallacy" makes makes for | a funny phrase, that implicitly mocks the Naturalistic | Fallacy but it's too long her for a HN username. | | *In the military this is considered objectively true, and | drawing dicks on things is one of humanity's oldest memes. | BiteCode_dev wrote: | It's a great idea, but unless they start by making it a real and | popular email service first, it will be blocked by most websites | very soon. | neon_electro wrote: | We'll see! It's already my primary email for a few core | services :) (I say primary because the others are still there | as backup) | BiteCode_dev wrote: | Unfortunatly you have one try for the domain. | | I already use spamgourmet (a old great free service in the | same features) and despite the fact it has several very | different domains, it's rejected sometimes. | | Something as high profile as ddg will be flagged very | quickly. | | The only one that can get away with it is gmail with the "+" | aliases, because nobody can afford to reject it. | solarkraft wrote: | Opening in Firefox on Android: | | > Email Protection is not available in this browser | | > Email Protection is also available on desktop with the | DuckDuckGo app for Mac (beta), as well as DuckDuckGo extensions | for Firefox, Chrome, Brave, and Edge. | | What, I need to install a piece of software to my computer or an | extension to my browser to use a service? That's invasive and, | without a very good explanation (that is nowhere to be seen on | that page), massively hurts my trust in the company. | yegg wrote: | The original link was never meant to be linked to directly -- | and has now been replaced with the announcement post. | solarkraft wrote: | Okay, but that's not an explanation. | | > That said, we may indeed offer sign up outside the | app/extension, but right now as a forwarding service, we are | very sensitive to abuse of the system and so limiting it a | bit helps to ensure we are on top of any abuse that doesn't | bring down the whole system. | | This is a satisfactory explanation. But it's neither on the | signup page, nor on the announcement page. | | ... and it's still really easy to accuse you of just trying | to get some app installs - which would be fine _if you | admitted it_. | Turpen wrote: | nine_k wrote: | Another (useful) service that could have been run on client, and | not have to allow access to the contents of my email to an | unrelated company. | | Sadly, the current situation with mobile and desktop software | makes it much easier to run this in a datacenter. Access to my | email's content, and especially binding my identity on many web | sites to the duck.com domain, likely is worth something, too. | megous wrote: | "To protect your privacy send emails via yet another additional | third party you have no control over." | | Makes no sense, despite the offered message content sanitization | that should be best done in the MUA. | firloop wrote: | This is cool - but I feel like to do this well you need to co- | mingle valid and masked emails on the same domain. Otherwise | services can and will prevent folks from signing up with | @duck.com emails. | | Apple does this well with their email masking service; all emails | have an @icloud.com domain, the same as primary emails. A service | can't simply block @icloud.com without blocking millions of | primary/default addresses. | 2Gkashmiri wrote: | i don't know man.... this sounds yet another service to subscribe | to for what benefit? | | i have been selfhosting on racknerd for like last 2 years and | beyond the first month, i have been pretty much put it on auto | mode. | | i use mailinabox so i get to use roundcube and it has a banner | | "To protect your privacy remote resources have been blocked." | | this is by default for all links and images unless i explicitly | allow someone so isn't that the same thing? | BobMit wrote: | Does it work without installing the extension? | therealmarv wrote: | There is absolutely NO reason to use only an extension or app for | that. I don't trust extensions. | | OSS alternative with freemium/paid subscription model (but | without email tracker removal unfortunately) | | https://anonaddy.com | tao_oat wrote: | I'm working on a similar project: https://shroud.email/ | | It doesn't yet have all the same features as | SimpleLogin/AnonAddy, but unlike them it does remove email | trackers. | 3np wrote: | There is also SimpleLogin. | | https://simplelogin.io/ | | https://github.com/simple-login/app | | AA and SL do look like the two more solid options compared to | anything else I've seen so far. | jaden wrote: | SimpleLogin was recently acquired by Proton [1]. I'm hoping | nothing changes, but you never know. | | [1] https://simplelogin.io/blog/simplelogin-join-proton/ | sha-3 wrote: | SimpleLogin was bought by Proton[0], so if you have a Proton | Unlimited, Business or Visionary plan, you'll get SimpleLogin | premium for free. | | [0]: https://proton.me/news/proton-and-simplelogin-join- | forces | Vinnl wrote: | Coincidentally we just this week added tracker removal to | https://relay.firefox.com/ (needs to be explicitly enabled due | to the risk of breakage). | | I should note though, that while it is open source (and | freemium), it's reliant on quite some infra that makes it | pretty much impossible to self-host, if that's something you're | looking to do. | [deleted] | [deleted] | benbristow wrote: | It's a good service and I've used it a few times, but the | requirement to use an extension is a bit of a pain point. | | Especially as the extension seems to try and install some adblock | style stuff which I already use ublock for and overwrites the | default search engine with no option to disable it. Every time I | need to generate a new email I need to re-enable the extension, | copy the email address and then disable the extension again. Not | nice UX. | Vinnl wrote: | I could also generate an alias from the web UI (though maybe | only with the extension installed?). | kjoedion wrote: | Will this allow DDG to place some of my emails at the bottom of | my inbox if they consider it Russian disinformation? | InCityDreams wrote: | My grandad is still not convinced. What the absolute fuck does | that all mean? | huangc10 wrote: | Came here for dmail, a gmail competitor. Semi disappointed but | still liking this security feature though. | elliekelly wrote: | Agreed. I'd really like a middle ground between proton and | gmail. Something that's easy enough to set up and won't | actively spy on me. | InCityDreams wrote: | >won't actively spy on me. | | Go on..... | googlryas wrote: | I'm not installing a brand new web browser, or a browser | extension, in order to use an email forwarding service. | [deleted] | TheRealNGenius wrote: | gerash wrote: | It seems like DuckDuckGo's raison d'etre is being "not Google". | Personally, I don't care about these "evil tracking" where my | screen size and user agent might get logged through some | telemetry. | | What I'd pay for in an email client is a way for it to help me | sort through the giant stream of stuff I constantly receive. | | For example when I buy something online I get 4 different email | threads in Gmail: 1. order confirmation 2.it was shipped 3.it's | arrived 4.fill up this survey | | I want my email client to cluster all those into one. Basically | sift through my crap and summarize what's important and delete | the unimportant stuff because I hate having to constantly keeping | my inbox tidy. | laundermaf wrote: | The pushback on the extension requirement is insane. Feels like | you could have been advertised this as a "DDG App" feature and | maybe that would have saved you a bit. | | As a Safari and Hide My Email user I completely welcome this | service. If anything, it pushes more companies to do the same. | luhn wrote: | Unfortunately, this seems to require the "DuckDuckGo Privacy | Essentials" extension to use it in your browser, which for Chrome | at least requires permission to "Read and change all your data on | all websites." It's not clear to me why an extension is necessary | at all, let alone an extension that much more broad than just | email and requires such extensive permissions. | | https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/duckduckgo-privacy... | yegg wrote: | Addressed in other comment (and comments below it) on this | thread here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32597463 | cguess wrote: | Cool, but no Safari support? | laundermaf wrote: | Safari extensions are a PITA compared to the others. However | considering that they already have apps in the store, I assume | they will start including the extension at some point. | pluc wrote: | > Email Protection requires the DuckDuckGo extension in this | browser. | | well, that's cool I guess | anonu wrote: | It doesnt really need an extension... dark pattern | pluc wrote: | You do if you want to autocomplete your email address in | fields I guess, but I agree it isn't a very good reason for | an extension. It's one of those convenience extension that, | would it be made by any other company, I'd be very suspicious | of. | [deleted] | mxuribe wrote: | The concept is great, and compared to other companies, i trust | duckduckgo more...but, there still a for-profit company (nothing | wrong with that)...so how will they sustain this? Maybe i'm not | so smart with funding models, but i would feel better if there | was some sort of pricing...to make me feel like as a user i'm not | the product...am i paranoid for being suspicious? | arealaccount wrote: | It seems like the browser extension quietly changes your browsers | default search engine to DuckDuckGo. | | Edit - I use DDG on several devices, but happen to not use it on | the one where I installed this extension. | oftenwrong wrote: | If you are interested in the "unlimited unique private email | addresses" functionality, also take a look at these other | services: | | https://33mail.com/ | | https://anonaddy.com/ | | https://burnermail.io/ | | https://relay.firefox.com/ | | https://simplelogin.io/ | | These all support custom domains, except for Firefox Relay, which | only supports a custom subdomain. | saimiam wrote: | I'm building https://pretzelbox.cc which is like mailinator for | your own domain. While it doesn't generate email addresses for | you, since it's a domain inbox, you can use whatever | string@you-domain.com to make it work. | | It's getting a bit of traction even with the rubbish website | :). | gkoberger wrote: | For people who aren't sure what this does: | https://spreadprivacy.com/protect-your-inbox-with-duckduckgo... | | EDIT: The site has been updated to point to this! | mwilliaams wrote: | Email tracking is just done through image downloads right? So | if images are blocked by default then tracking isn't possible? | Image blocking is easy enough to do. | gregmac wrote: | Is there any tracking other than images? I do "Block all | images" in email anyway, would I gain anything (in terms of | tracking protection) from this? | ctrlmeta wrote: | I don't understand why it needs me to install a browser | extension. That's a very weird requirement to sign up for an | email address? Could someone explain why an extension is needed | or why it was designed like this? | websap wrote: | I need to install a browser extension to use an email forwarding | service? What information could DDG read from my emails when | forwarding? | | This blogpost does a REALLY POOR job to explain what, why and how | to use this. Hope someone can clean this up and simplify what | this service does. | m1117 wrote: | tt_dev wrote: | whats the catch? | ArrayBoundCheck wrote: | The fact that this exist shows open source is bad. We should have | had an alternative to email by now | pluc wrote: | Feels like it tries to solve the same problems as Mozilla Relay | [1] (they call it Firefox Relay, but the addresses are | @mozmail.com soooo) except Mozilla lets you attribute specific | aliases for things. | | 1 https://relay.firefox.com/ | laundermaf wrote: | Good to see more like it, but having only 5 addresses for free | feels like DOA now. Even during the waitlist they didn't | increase the number, kinda shameful. | cmurf wrote: | Does it pass "the mom test"? The people who need this kind of | protection aren't as much HNers, but the friends and family of | HNers. | [deleted] | yonrg wrote: | The idea of on-demand addresses is great. I operate my mail | server since 2006 now and implemented such feature straight away. | I started to never use the same mail address again. name- | something@domain just forwards to the inbox of name. After a time | I lost track about all the addresses I "generated". | | But one thing was nice, I registered my mail with a hotline agent | via phone. I told them my mail is name-$YOURCOMPANYNAME@domain. | They replied, oh you are a colleague, then I can give you | discount :) | saimiam wrote: | How did you end up resolving the issue with too many generated | emails addresses? I built and use my own domain inbox which | buckets emails by email addresses (https://PretzelBox.cc) but | more and more, I find myself using just one or two email | addresses. | raybb wrote: | I wonder how the privacy aspects of this compare to Firefox | Relay? | | Having used Firefox Relay a bit, I'm pretty happy with it but the | free tier is relatively limited. DDG email seems to allow | unlimited addresses but after a quick look it's not obvious that | you can turn them off if an account is getting too much spam. | | https://relay.firefox.com/ | aaaddaaaaa1112 wrote: | smotched wrote: | I've completely switched to brave search for browsing, I can | never trust DDG again. | radicaldreamer wrote: | Would be good to have context here... not that Brave hasn't had | its own share of controversies. | melony wrote: | Brave's controversies are mostly related to its monetisation, | not censorship. They are not the same. | yegg wrote: | I'm the founder and CEO of DuckDuckGo. We are not (and never | were) censoring results. I realize I caused the | misunderstanding due to own my unfortunate phrasing in a tweet, | and since then, how our news results rankings work has been | highly misinterpreted. | | We (DuckDuckGo) subsequently made a help page to explain it in | detail: https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/results/ne... Tl;dr: we don't censor, we don't move | things so far down that they are effectively censored, we don't | evaluate individual stories or narratives for "truth", and we | don't rank based on any political agenda or opinions. This is | just a summary though so would read the help page for details. | | I also put out a clarification thread about misconceptions that | included this topic amongst others (like the fact that no, | we're not owned by Google), but the help page referenced above | is the best and most thorough explanation of our news rankings. | https://twitter.com/yegg/status/1515635886855233537 | smotched wrote: | Its not the results I'm worried about with DDG, after all you | just use bing behind the scenes although I think there's some | shenanigans there too. | | It's your deep financial ties to Microsoft that's worrying. | And it seems you're willing to turn your back on | privacy/tracking for your friends when Microsoft asks. | | https://twitter.com/shivan_kaul/status/1528879590772338689 | yegg wrote: | The tweet you referenced is no longer the case. See | https://spreadprivacy.com/more-privacy-and-transparency/. | We've also since open sourced our web tracker block list | (all our apps and extensions were already open sourced) and | put out a help page detailing how all our web tracking | protections work across platforms: | https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/privacy/we... | | As for our private search engine, it is in actually way | more than Bing at this point. We have approximately a | millions lines of search code at this point, many tens of | millions of dollars invested in them and a staff of about | 200. | InCityDreams wrote: | Hello 'yegg'. What's your stake in all this? Who are you? | TheRealNGenius wrote: | Hello "incitydreams", you first. | yegg wrote: | I am the founder and CEO of DuckDuckGo. | jacquesm wrote: | Who yegg is is well known on HN, but you yourself are | anonymous so it's a bit weird to see this exchange. Maybe | (1) click on the name of the person before asking them who | they are and (2) flesh out your profile to return the | favor? | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DuckDuckGo | thedorkknight wrote: | What happened? | djanogo wrote: | They started censoring websites based on "political fake | news" filter list supplied by MSM. | Bilal_io wrote: | > based on "political fake news" filter list supplied by | MSM | | Can you provide a citation for this? | behnamoh wrote: | Search HN, it was a big buzz recently. | rvz wrote: | DuckDuckGo's search manipulation is just no different to | Google's since essentially they are using Microsoft | Bing's search results. [0] So the manipulation, down- | ranking and censoring of search results was inevitable | with tons of evidence of this: [1][2][3][4] | | "At DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates | that down-rank sites associated with Russian | disinformation.": [1] | | At this point, DDG is a front for Microsoft using | 'privacy' buzzwords. Might as well use Brave Search then. | | [0] https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/results/so... | | [1] https://twitter.com/yegg/status/1501716484761997318 | | [2] https://www.vox.com/recode/22981115/duckduckgo-free- | speech-p... | | [3] https://www.reddit.com/r/duckduckgo/comments/hx5dn5/p | roof_du... | | [4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27395635 | codeecan wrote: | > Like so many others I am sickened by Russia's invasion | of Ukraine and the gigantic humanitarian crisis it | continues to create. #StandWithUkraine | | At DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates that | _down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation_. | | https://twitter.com/yegg/status/1501716484761997318 | | ----- | | > In addition to down-ranking sites associated with | disinformation, we also often place news modules and | information boxes at the top of DuckDuckGo search results | (where they are seen and clicked the most) to _highlight | quality information for rapidly unfolding topics_. | | https://twitter.com/yegg/status/1501717193855283201 | | ---- | | It should be obvious why this is problematic ... | yegg wrote: | FYI - I'm the founder and CEO of DuckDuckGo and responded | to this in another comment: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32597340. | ipaddr wrote: | https://mashable.com/article/duckduckgo-search-engine- | russia... | | Or search google yourself to get a broader picture. | Kye wrote: | Some people are upset about a company curating the database | it uses to return results. | TopGreg wrote: | [deleted] | giancarlostoro wrote: | During the Russia / Ukraine conflict the Duck Duck Go founder | decided to filter out any results which are deemed as Russian | misinformation. Censorship of any kind, is always still in | the end, censorship. | | This is the gist of what everyone is upset about, of those | who are upset. The entire point of DDG was that the search | results were never to be tampered with for personalization | reasons, censoring results due to political reasons seems to | be a slippery slope. | brnt wrote: | Censorship is always censorship, yes, and naivite is always | naivite. Meet the tolerance paradox! | | Also, search engines have _as their sole purpose_ sorting | their list of links by some measure of quality. Removing | useless nonsense is what we go there for. | pwinnski wrote: | "The entire point of Company was ABC, doing 867 seems to be | a slippery slope." Huh? | | I don't see how capturing personal information from users | for any reason has anything whatsoever to do with omitting | perceived misinformation from _all_ users across the board. | One can agree or disagree with the decision, but they are | two entirely different issues in entirely different areas, | and one is in no way a "slippery slope" toward the other. | drstewart wrote: | I can't think of a situation where I'd want to use this - if I | don't trust the provider, I'm using a throwaway email like | mailinator.com. Curious to hear about what use cases this would | fall into? | saimiam wrote: | If you want to take it to next level after mailinator.com, I'm | building https://pretzelbox.cc - an inbox for your domain. Use | whatever string@your-domain.com and we'll forward emails to | your linked email account. | baobob wrote: | You have to install a browser extension to use email? Who had | this bright idea? | TekMol wrote: | Prompting the user to install a browser extension to use an email | forwarder looks like a dark pattern to me. | | This lowers my trust in DDG. | | It's the same approach all companies use, once they grow. | "Everyone is telling you they are the good guys, but they are | throwing invasive technology at you! Fight back! ... by | installing our invasive technology! Trust us, we are the good | guys!" | laundermaf wrote: | I really don't see the issue here. It's completely | understandable that DDG would not want to offer an easy API for | this. This is likely seen as a "DDG app" feature _exactly_ like | Safari's Hide My Email and like every browser's password | manager. | | They _could_ offer an external UI, but this is a beta and DDG | is not an ISP. If you want email forwarding, you already have | plenty of choices -- and catch-all addresses and plus signs. | tradertef wrote: | Yep. The moment I saw the "extension" requirement, I stopped. | yegg wrote: | We offer an all-in-one privacy app. The extension/app generates | the addresses and autofills them into email forms, and so you | need the extension/app for those key parts of the | functionality. Once signed up you can use it somewhat though | without the extension/app by giving out your personal duck | address directly, and trackers will be stripped from messages | sent to it and then forwarded to your regular inbox. | | That said, we may indeed offer sign up outside the | app/extension, but right now as a forwarding service, we are | very sensitive to abuse of the system and so limiting it a bit | helps to ensure we are on top of any abuse that doesn't bring | down the whole system. | Agrue8u wrote: | But the app changes my default search page and new tab home | page without my permission. I installed the app to get my | duck email address then immediately disabled it. | yegg wrote: | I'm not sure which "app" you are referring to in this case, | but generally private search is a key part of being private | online. In every browser but Chrome, you can, however, | subsequently change the search engine if you want. It's not | our fault you can't do it in Chrome -- that is their | restriction. | TekMol wrote: | I would not install an extension to give me a generated | address. I would expect your website to give it to me. | | Putting generated addresses into forms... I would do that | manually. | | If I _really_ would do that multiple times a day (But who | signs up for services so often?) I would use a bookmarklet | for it. | | Bookmarklets are way less intrusive than extensions. And have | other usability advantages. I can nicely put them into my | bookmarks for example. | yegg wrote: | As said, we may support this in the future. We did a lot of | testing and found unequivocally that most people would | prefer to have generated addresses automatically available | in context within email fields when they use signup forms | vs. having to go back to another website to get them (which | most wouldn't actually do). | TekMol wrote: | I agree with you in so far, that you would probably have | 1000 times less users if you would cater to people like | me. | | But it still feels wrong to me. Instead of giving company | A their email, you are suggesting people give company B | full access to all their browsing data. The "Trust us we | are the good guys" approach just does not click with me. | yegg wrote: | Understood, though just to be clear, email field | identification happens client side, so we don't get your | browsing history. More fundamentally though, we make a | browser, and our privacy policy is to never create search | or browsing histories. | TekMol wrote: | I said you get _access_ to peoples browsing data. Your | extension can access everything on every page people | visit. And can send that data eveywhere. | | That you promise to behave well does not change that. It | is the "Trust us" argument again. If we could trust | companies, we could give them our real emails. | pwinnski wrote: | > If we could trust companies, we could give them our | real emails. | | I'm assuming you realize that there is more than one | company, and that one can trust different companies to | different extents. I trust DDG more than I trust most | other companies. I trust DDG more than I trust Amazon, | and I've given Amazon my email--a decision I sometimes | regret! | 0xChain wrote: | sha-3 wrote: | Could you, if it's possible, at least remove the full | browsing data permission on the extension? | yegg wrote: | That is required to provide all our various web tracking | protections: https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/privacy/we... | akomtu wrote: | So you offer a privacy app that needs to see everything I'm | doing online, just like a VPN, but at the html level. And | that "html vpn" is free, funded by god knows who. I wouldn't | use it, but I admit this might be a valid business idea. I'll | also add that this "vpn" app trades a bit of DDG's reputation | for attention. | yegg wrote: | No, unlike a VPN, our web tracker blocking all happens on | your device. See our help page for details: | https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/privacy/we.... We are are funded through private | search ads. | Terretta wrote: | The Waitlist suggested access to this was tied to device | identifier. | | When I tried today I was not waitlisted, but I also wasn't | challenged to identify myself that I saw. I created my | forwarder. I'm puzzled how, if this is connected to my device | ID in some way, I will be able to access it on my next | device. | yegg wrote: | It is not connected to your device id. The waitlist worked | on your device by storing a local token, and we never had | your device id. On other devices/browsers you will need to | authenticate via an email code/link forwarded through the | service. | jrexilius wrote: | Dear DuckDuckGo, | | Please let me pay for this service. It looks worth having and: 1) | I'd like to know that it is funded by users, rather than | advertisers and thus can resist privacy invasion presuures. 2) | I'd like to have some basis for belief that it will be around | longer than it takes the VC money to run out, (or the marketing | budget, or whatever non-sustainable pot it comes from). | snthd wrote: | Firefox relay premium will take your money (currently $1 a | month). | | https://relay.firefox.com/premium/ | aorth wrote: | I pay for this and use it regularly. It's awesome! | C4K3 wrote: | https://sneakemail.com/ is another one that's been around for a | long time. | behnamoh wrote: | " Email Protection is not available in this browser. | | Open this page in the DuckDuckGo app to continue." | | Reminds me of Reddit shenanigans... | [deleted] | ThatMedicIsASpy wrote: | How much would you pay? I've moved to posteo and I can't think | of paying more than 1EUR/month for email. I never considered | Protonmail because 4EUR/month is what i consider way too much | for email. My root server is 6EUR/month (atom/4gb/1tb/100mbit). | rnotaro wrote: | I personally pay 10$ a month for GSuite basically to handle | the mail of my personal domain name. Is it worth it? I'm not | sure yet but I had way to much issues with email not | delivered in the past (blacklisted IP ranges, reputation, | etc.) when I had my own mail server. | | I prefer paying 10$ a month and forget about mail server | issues and wondering if my mail is going to the spam folder.. | justusthane wrote: | To me email is one of the most worthwhile services to pay for | --it is the backbone of your digital identity after all. | | That being said, there's probably not much need to pay more | than $5/mo. I'm very happy with Fastmail at $60/yr. | jrexilius wrote: | For a mail relay service, I'd probably pay $24-$36/yr. I | happily pay Proton $50/yr for quality email service. $12/yr | would be a no-brainer. | unboxingelf wrote: | Fastmail is paid and has this feature. | therealmarv wrote: | Just go to https://anonaddy.com (it just cannot filter out | trackers in messages) | js2 wrote: | In the meantime, you can pay either Apple or Fastmail for this | feature as part of their larger product offerings. Maybe there | are other paid services which offer this as a feature. These | are just the ones I'm aware of. | Vinnl wrote: | I work at Mozilla, and we've got https://relay.firefox.com/ | archb wrote: | I have read the FAQs page but I am not seeing an answer to | a question just yet: can one lock the 0.99 USD limited time | discount forever? | [deleted] | yegg wrote: | DuckDuckGo has been profitable since 2014 through private | search ads, and our company is not controlled or beholden to | venture capital (or VC or other money). | | Our product vision is an "easy button" for privacy, an all-in- | one privacy app. Email protection is part of that, along with | search, browsing, etc. Put another way, we see email protection | as part of our core product, and within our app we autofill | duck addresses in email forms. | | We will take your comment into consideration, though we prefer | free services where possible so more people can get privacy | protection, which is in line with our mission. This service | comes with it a set of privacy guarantees here: | https://duckduckgo.com/email/privacy-guarantees and we will not | be putting ads on it. | snihalani wrote: | Can you build an email hosting service on par with Gmail? I'd | really like to get out of being on Google | [deleted] | crocbuzz wrote: | Have you tried FastMail? Probably the closest thing to a G | Suite/Workspace alternative that doesn't have ties to "Big | Tech". | pwinnski wrote: | +1 for Fastmail. | lolinder wrote: | This answers the VC money fear, but not everything else OP | brought up. | | If a product is subsidized by a company's other products, | it's hard for me to believe it'll be around forever. For an | email product, that's a huge problem, because I use my | address in hundreds of contexts that take a _long_ time to | identify and migrate, much longer than a typical company 's | sunsetting notice. | | EDIT: The parent comment was edited to note that they | perceive DDG Email as part of the core product, not a | separate product. That's helpful to know, but I'm still | skeptical that that's sustainable in the long term. This | would not be the first time a _feature_ was cut from a | product because it was too expensive to maintain. I 'll be | waiting to see their unified privacy solution really take off | before I place any bets on this feature. | [deleted] | jsnell wrote: | The business case seems pretty obvious: They're using this | as a way of getting people to install a browser extension / | app, and changing their default search engine. A search | user is valuable, which makes customer acquisition | expensive. This also makes their extension way more sticky. | | Just because you're a product doesn't mean the service is | not sustainable. It should be very easy for them to figure | out whether the feature is profitable or not compared to | other acquisition methods. | karlzt wrote: | He/she probably meant: keep it free with a donate button. | InCityDreams wrote: | dwighttk wrote: | yegg is the ceo and founder of Duck Duck Go | jacquesm wrote: | https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=yegg | ddg01 wrote: | TopGreg wrote: | vinaypai wrote: | DDG has regularly raised money from VCs including a Series D | about a year ago. | https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/duck-duck- | go/company... | macNchz wrote: | I can't speak for their circumstances, but I'd assume a VC- | backed company describing themselves as "not beholden" to | VCs means they're default alive without additional | fundraising, and that they haven't given over majority | control of the board to their investors. | Alupis wrote: | yegg wrote: | We are not (and never were) censoring results. I realize I | caused the misunderstanding due to own my unfortunate | phrasing in a tweet, and since then, how our news results | rankings work has been highly misinterpreted. | | We (DuckDuckGo) subsequently made a help page to explain it | in detail: https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/results/ne.... Tl;dr: we don't censor, we don't move | things so far down that they are effectively censored, we | don't evaluate individual stories or narratives for "truth", | and we don't rank based on any political agenda or opinions. | This is just a summary though so would read the help page for | details. | | I also put out a clarification thread about various | misconceptions that included this topic amongst others (like | the fact that no, we're not owned by Google), but the help | page referenced above is the best and most thorough | explanation of our news rankings. | https://twitter.com/yegg/status/1515635886855233537 | Alupis wrote: | I'm sorry, but this does not seem to counter your initial | tweet at all. Your first tweet said, and I quote, "At | DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates that | down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation." | | This is censorship, since DDG is now deciding what is | considered "Disinformation". | | Your clarification thread does not state DDG is not down- | ranking these sites based on what DDG feels is | "disinformation". It merely asserts DDG is not purging | results - these are two very different things. | | Just to be clear, I too support Ukraine, and am aghast at | the deliberately misleading information ("disinformation") | coming out of the Russian War Machine. However, as I | previously wrote, the truth needs no defense. Hiding away | things we don't like doesn't make them go away, it just | makes them go underground. We need this information freely | available so it can be discussed and disproven out in the | open. | | If users wanted curated search results, they might as well | use Google or Bing... | | Lastly, to repeat, Privacy + Censorship (of any kind) do | not go together. This was quite a large misstep for DDG, | and has burned a lot of trust. | yegg wrote: | Not sure if you read the whole thread as it says | explicitly "We are not ranking based on any political | agenda or my (or anyone else's) personal political | opinions. We are also not assessing any individual news | stories." | | That said, the help page I referenced is the most | detailed explanation of how our news rankings work: | https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/results/ne.... | | To be clear, that means we do not have a definition of | "disinformation". I'm to blame for tweeting something | that was highly ambiguous but we were never actually | doing what we've been accused of doing. | rpdillon wrote: | They rank based on relevancy. Domains that are found | misleading readers often are less relevant than domains | that are misleading readers less often. That's it. All | search engines have to make these calls all the time, and | I see no viable alternative approach that would be | better. There is no 'natural' ordering of the web...it's | all judgment. If you think DDG's results are less | relevant than those you get elsewhere, use the better | engine! | 735409264082 wrote: | I think you lost all credibility when you made that tweet. | If you want to regain it, you should be completely | transparent about which sites you have taken any specific | ranking action regarding, and why. This should be | relatively easy to do, as you say you take action very | rarely. | groffee wrote: | dang wrote: | Please don't post like this to HN, regardless of what | someone else did or you feel they did. Regardless of what | you do or don't owe them, you owe this community better | if you're participating in it. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | blakesley wrote: | [Original comment removed by author 'cuz it's now moot] | | Edit: My bad, I missed a legit link in parent comment. That | said, that link should have been front & center. (Edit 2: | it now is. Good on you!) | yegg wrote: | The help page referenced is only about this topic and | provides the most thorough and up to date explanation of | how our news rankings work: | https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help- | pages/results/ne... | masterof0 wrote: | @yegg Even if you don't agree with one side, you can't | consider the side to be "spam", "disinformation" or | "propaganda" and hope people will just be OK with that. | What is spam to you, is useful information for somebody | else, some people love what Tucker Carlson have to say, | others prefer Brian Stelter. That's why freedom of speech | exists[1]. I think the right approach to down ranking is | having a banner with a link with undeniable proof of what | the article says is wrong, which is very hard to do, I get | it. Otherwise, is preferential down ranking, and whatever | you argue on Twitter won't change the minds of people. I | too have been using DDG from the beginning, and I'm | grateful more private alternative to Google exists, I just | hate censoring as much as privacy violating businesses. | | 1- https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct- | neo-naz... | yegg wrote: | I think you may have misinterpreted how this works. We do | not do any page or story or narrative level assessment or | fact checking at all, or any fact checking for that | matter. | [deleted] | TopGreg wrote: | ukd1 wrote: | And this is why I switched to kagi.com. Also, helps the search | results are better. | EGreg wrote: | I don't understand why people think the converse of "if you are | not the customer, you're the product" is true. | | Contrapositive yes, converse no. Companies could still make | money from both sides of a market. Look at the lack of net | neutrality. Look also at how ISPs used to be able to sell your | data, despite you paying them ! | vinaypai wrote: | This. | | This is also the reason I'm not particularly excited about DDG | in general. They have exactly the same business model as | Google, so there is no reason for me to feel confident they | won't follow the same trajectory as Google. | ipaddr wrote: | But they don't. Google is much bigger than search from an | office competitor to a cloud provider to a phone software | vendor. DDG will not become google. Something with a bigger | reach like tiktok might. | | Being funded by search ads was never an issue with google and | privacy until they switch from contextual ads and morphed | into personal ads. | | DDG winning search on bing search isn't the same trajectory. | At best lycos like would be the most likely trajectory. | vinaypai wrote: | Google in 1999 was an upstart search provider promising a | clean, minimal, user-focused ad-supported search experience | as an alternative to entrenched search engines like Lycos, | Altavista, Yahoo. | | DuckDuckGo in 2022 is an upstart search provider promising | a clean, minimal, user-focused ad-supported search | experience as an alternative to entrenched search engines | like Google. | | I'm old enough to remember when Google was the new and | exciting thing (just give it a try and ignore the stupid- | sounding name!). For the longest time there wasn't even | such a thing as a Google account, it just saved preferences | like safe-search locally using cookies, and ads were just a | small distinctly colored text bar above the organic search | results, directly related to your search keywords. | Terretta wrote: | Consider paying for kagi.com. | ukd1 wrote: | As a paying subscriber, I 2nd this - it's great. | dwighttk wrote: | True. | | Not sure how paying for this service makes it any less | likely that DDG will flip a switch to make that targeted | advertising money though. That temptation will exist | either with a paid service or a non targeted ad supported | service. | codegladiator wrote: | What search engine do you use ( I am assuming its not | google ) ? | yojo wrote: | The original Google ads were actually to the side - no | way of confusing them with organic listings. Ads above | results weren't rolled out until 2007ish. Internally | there was a lot of debate as to whether this might be | confusing to users/evil, so the decision was to only show | ads above results on queries that appeared to be high | commercial intent. RIP old Google | colordrops wrote: | As long as ads are their core revenue stream, there is a | risk of compromising users. If you aren't paying for hte | product, you aren't the customer, as the old saying goes, | and no superficial rationale for why they are "different" | will change this. | jacooper wrote: | There is https://simplelogin.io and https://anonnaddy.com | | Which support custom domain and more features, and not locked | to a specific browser. | | Both open source and self-hostable, SL is by Proton(Mail). | oofdere wrote: | DDG email protection isn't locked to a single browser, I've | been using it on Chrome/ium and Firefox for around a year | now. | archb wrote: | Same, it is not available on Safari though. | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | Interesting. Just noticed that DDG have removed a graph with | traffic from their stats page [1]. I wonder if it is because the | daily average stopped growing like it used to... | | [1]: https://duckduckgo.com/traffic | nashashmi wrote: | What is DDG getting out of this "free" service? | InCityDreams wrote: | How old are you? Depening on location/ age/ combining the two, | the easy answer is "more than you could ever believe". Why? | Because it's not at all clear, and you had to ask that | question. | | Just waiting for the 'apology' in 3..2... | srg0 wrote: | I'm using duck.com, Hide My Email and Firefox Relay. All work | fine, but I think Firefox Relay has better UI to manage aliases: | it has tags and can block promotional emails. And I like that | it's a paid service. | jcadam wrote: | DDG? Nah, I'll stick with Startmail (https://startmail.com) - | which is a paid service - until they do something to lose my | trust. | sparrc wrote: | Anyone have a writeup that doesn't require the browser extension? | bertman wrote: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32596459 | blitzo wrote: | Can't launch Brave on incognito mode (Target path --incognito) | after installing the extension. | siproprio wrote: | Very cool, and even replying works! | brbot wrote: | Will DDG ever drop Bing index (yes, I've heard of mythical DDG | crawler)? In current form, calling DDG a search engine is an | overstatement, it's more like a Bing proxy. By a nature, what was | censored in Bing is censored on DDG. | pierrebeaucamp wrote: | > Email Protection is not available in this browser. | | I'm surprised to see that Safari is not supported. | laundermaf wrote: | Safari already has Hide My Email, assuming you're already | laying $60/year for iCloud. | noisy_boy wrote: | Fastmail also has the feature of being able to generate throwaway | email addresses for sign-ups and it doesn't require installation | of any extension - they call it masked email in the settings[0]. | Pretty happy with it. | | https://www.fastmail.com/settings/masked | CA0DA wrote: | Won't lots of services just start blocking *@duck.com email | addresses now? | megapatch wrote: | Then you don't use that service. | blibble wrote: | most likely | | the only way the fastmail one works is there's paying customers | on that domain (and a lot of them) | saimiam wrote: | If that happens, check out https://PretzelBox.cc (FD - my | product) and get *@your-domain.com. | | They can't block all domains other than gmail and outlook, can | they? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-25 23:00 UTC)