[HN Gopher] Ghana bans a Delta Boeing 767 (yes, just one) ___________________________________________________________________ Ghana bans a Delta Boeing 767 (yes, just one) Author : mcenedella Score : 138 points Date : 2022-08-26 18:42 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (onemileatatime.com) (TXT) w3m dump (onemileatatime.com) | ramesh31 wrote: | Seems like a perfect storm of max length ETOPS flight combined | with a seriously aged airframe, resulting in a vastly increased | margin of safety needed to complete the flight. If you plot JFK | -> ACC on Google Earth, you can see the flightpath perfectly | threads the needle between Bermuda and the Azores, creating what | is probably the longest overwater route with no diversions | possible from the east coast. | | The 767's are really only profitable on these "long fat" routes | anymore, and I suspect this will probably be the start of Delta | retiring them for 787s or A350s. | djohnston wrote: | I love it! Pretty funny story as no one was hurt and there was no | material damage. This is also a great example of why your code | will inevitably end up with a bunch of if-else blocks if it is | popular and used for a long enough time XD. I would like to see | how this is coded into Delta's flight logistics software. | tpmx wrote: | > I would like to see how this is coded into Delta's flight | logistics software. | | By cancelling the service to Accra, probably. | BoorishBears wrote: | I don't know what level of misunderstanding it takes to think | this. | | Misunderstanding the airline industry, or the country, or how | airports operate, or what really. | jrockway wrote: | I think there's a certain contingent that reacts to any | regulation with "fine, then I'll take my ball and go home". | Country has safety requirements, they deny any service to | that country as retribution. | | The real world has more shades of grey. Delta can probably | put a note in their scheduling system to make sure the | airliner in question doesn't go to that country. They also | know how much money they lose if they take their ball and | go home, and probably wouldn't even be flying the route if | it was completely unprofitable. (There are probably | partners that rely on the service, and maintaining a good | relationship with business partners is important too in a | less financially-obvious way.) | diputsmonro wrote: | Would you like to contribute your knowledge to the | conversation then? | | It seems like it would be a knee-jerk overreaction to be, | but Delta obviously has a lot of management issues and a | shortsighted knee-jerk decision from them (or most giant | corporations) would not surprise me. | Mountain_Skies wrote: | Delta had at one point been developing Accra into a hub | for their other destinations in western Africa but not | sure they're still going in that direction with the way | the transportation world has changed in the past few | years. Either way, they probably do have a good bit of | investment in facilities there. | rsynnott wrote: | ... Wait, why would they do that? They presumably make money | on the route, or they wouldn't run it (it's not like it's one | of those routes you have to have even if it's loss-making), | and they have lots of 767s; they can just shift the Forbidden | 767 elsewhere. Are you suggesting they'd scrap it out of | _spite_? Not how enormous companies work in general. | [deleted] | kzrdude wrote: | another if-else block? I'm thinking another database table of | banned plane-route combinations, if they don't already have it. | Mountain_Skies wrote: | Seems reasonable that they have some sort of rules engine | that tracks this type of thing. A country banning a | particular aircraft might be rare but differing environmental | and noise laws around the world probably means there are | quite a few restrictions on which aircraft can go to which | destinations beyond the major reasons like runway size and | gate facilities. | diputsmonro wrote: | Ideally, sure, but the article makes it seems like a rare | ocurrence. And if their plane maintenance is any indication, | I'm not sure their application architecture would be | following such best practices. | rsynnott wrote: | This specific thing is a rare occurrence, but "only certain | special variant planes can land at this weird airport" (for | instance, LCY requires a specific 318 variant) is more | common. | inferiorhuman wrote: | And if their plane maintenance is any indication | | Delta runs one of the premier maintenance outfits (Delta | TechOps) globally. About a quarter of their TechOps | business is for outside airlines. So sure if that's any | indication their application architecture is probably | pretty decent (it's not). | | This was an ETOPS flight, yeah? Those come with higher | standards for crew training, maintenance, and minimum | equipment per the FAA. I wouldn't worry until/unless the | FAA starts making noise about revoking Delta's ETOPS | certification (which would hurt their ability to fly a | bunch of routes and their ability to perform maintenance | for e.g. Hawaiian). | Ekaros wrote: | Also if the plane gets retired, does that clause stay there? | TremendousJudge wrote: | If it's anything like other codebases I've seen, yes. | themadturk wrote: | Presumably the same registration number wouldn't be | necessarily re-used for a 767, and the ban is on the 767 with | that registration, not on a hypothetical 777 with the same | registration. | cjrp wrote: | Would have been better to ban the plane's manufacturer serial | number. | addaon wrote: | Yes. Registration numbers can be reused. Even if Delta | retires the plane, they are forbidden from flying a future | plane with that registration to Accra (barring a presumedly | easy appeal), so the code must stay. | bowmessage wrote: | > no one was hurt | | Check out https://youtu.be/7PQTMx7TZ9A, quite a few folks went | through some emotional trauma over this one, unfortunately. | serf wrote: | I get that it was traumatic, but I don't think we should | begin comparing the trauma and distress of a bad plane ride | for someone with a fear of flying to the trauma and distress | of a plane crash. | | by 'hurt' the earlier parent was pretty obviously (at least | for me) referring to the chance at an outright failure and | crash resulting in injury or loss of life. | | not that a bad experience and the resulting psychological | trauma doesn't constitute 'hurt'; but it's a kind of hurt | that one stands a chance to recover from . | assttoasstmgr wrote: | Happy4000 wrote: | Between 2010 and 2013, I used to fly to Ghana most summers. Delta | would use old aircraft on this route. Inflight entertainment was | the screen hanging in the middle of the aisle. Watching a movie | on the flight was a challenge. You had to bring your own | entertainment to pass the time. | | Eventually I stopped using that route and took KLM instead. KLM | to Schiphol and to Accra. KLM was in a world of it's own. Similar | planes irrespective of whether I was in the US or flying to | Ghana. Personal inflight entertainment. The service was way | better. | inferiorhuman wrote: | Delta would use old aircraft on this route | | Delta uses old aircraft on most of their routes. That's been | their MO for a while. Delta was the launch customer for the | DC-9 in 1965 and retired the type in _2014_. COVID accelerated | the retirement of the derivatives (MD-80 /90), but they're | still flying the 717 (a.k.a. MD-95). | | The last time I flew SFO-JFK I was on a Delta 767- _400_ and | yeah Delta hasn 't updated the interiors on those. Compared to | other airlines that typically run a premium (single aisle) | product on that route the extra aisle and the 2-3-2 seating are | pretty competitive unless you're jonesing for crappy seat back | entertainment. | wenc wrote: | I don't know about most of their routes but likely most of | their long hauls. | | Only 20% of their fleet today are 757s and 767s (and they are | the largest operator for both), but they are also the largest | operator for the Bombardier/Airbus A220 -- my favorite short | haul plane, which is an engineering marvel and a new design. | | A lot of the MDs were from the Northwest Airlines days which | they merged with. I used to fly NWA and the cabins were never | inspiring but the points never expired and were among the | best in the industry. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Air_Lines_fleet | quink wrote: | They have 127 Boeing 757s, a plane that stopped being made | two decades ago with still no clear successor. | xattt wrote: | As does Icelandair. | woodruffw wrote: | I wonder if this is a general phenomenon with Delta's | codeshare partners: I flew on a KLM 747-400 that looked like | it came right out of the 1990s a couple of years ago. I think | they've retired it since, but it was very surprising to step | onto. | Symbiote wrote: | KLM have fairly new aircraft, on average. | vorpalhex wrote: | I kind of agree with Ghana here. Gotta maintain your planes. It's | sad that a foreign country has to be the one making Delta do | routine pmc. | bombcar wrote: | More importantly, this is an easy way for Ghana to say "get | another damn plane on this route". | spaceflunky wrote: | Strongly agree with Ghana. Seems like a reasonable way to stick | up for yourself. | iepathos wrote: | They aren't making them take care of the plane though. Delta is | just routing the plane to go to European countries now instead. | Delta dgaf | yardie wrote: | This plane is now flying LAX, JFK, Edinburgh, and Lisboa. | | https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N195DN/history | tpmx wrote: | As it did before. During the past three months only 10 (or | about 6%) of its 170 flights have involved Ghana, either as | source or destination. It's mostly been flying in US/EU. | | Source: that URL, with an old free membership. | | Here's a news article from Ghana regarding the whole thing, | including photos of the official letter to Delta from their | aviation authority, etc: | | https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Delta- | Air... | ericbarrett wrote: | Makes sense for Ghana, there's likely far fewer direct | flights to NYC than from, say, Paris, and transfers would add | many hours as they're probably through Europe. Disruptions on | this flight would have an outsized impact on diplomats and | business execs. | sjm-lbm wrote: | They are making them take care of the plane, at least to the | limits of their authority. It's not like they have much say | about what a US-based airline does outside of their borders. | BeMoreSpecific wrote: | amelius wrote: | If you want to be more sure you're on a safe flight, fly over | Ghana. | 0110101001 wrote: | A YouTube discussion between passengers on each of the flights | turned around and a professional pilot: | | https://youtu.be/7PQTMx7TZ9A | deelowe wrote: | Great to see this follow up. I saw the original critique from | 74 gear and didn't realize they did this. | xvector wrote: | It's a shame the executives running Delta aren't hit with | crippling fines. The ability of individuals to hide behind the | mask of a corporation is perhaps the worst thing about modern | capitalism. | dijonman2 wrote: | Why hit Delta with crippling fines? Has there been loss of | life? Or anything close to it? | | Sounds like the pilots returned to NYC out of caution. Modern | aviation safety at work. | toss1 wrote: | >>Has there been loss of life? | | Not YET | | >>Or anything close to it? | | Depends on what the problems were. | | Smart organizations don't track accidents and deaths (e.g., | factories with the big "N Days Since a Time Lost Accident" | sign out front), they track anythign resembling a close call, | and I've even seen signs tracking that. | | this is no different than tracking storage or memory failures | so that you can pull the unit BEFORE it fails, because an | increase in rate of minor incidents PREDICTS the failure. | | In the case of civil aviation, when it gets to the point of | loss of life or anything close to it, you are likely talking | hundreds of lives. Smart people who are not sociopaths care | about preventing that sort of failure. Evidently the execs at | Delta do not, just as the execs at Boeing did not, and had to | kill hundreds of people in two crashes to pull the 737-max | off the flightlines. | | Yes, this was a smart move by Ghana, and yes we do need | personal liability for setting up a system that devalues | people's lives in pursuit of profit (and no, that does not | mean that every remote possibility of harm could send someone | to jail, but systemic negligence of safety should have real | consequences not just corporate fines. At the very least, if | corporations are supposed to be like people, we need the | corporate death penalty - significant crimes and the corp | goes to the chopping block, assets individually auctioned | off). | notahacker wrote: | Do you _honestly_ think Delta isn 't tracking its aircraft | performance? Perhaps in _even_ more detail than a factory | with a big sign! | | The reason the aircraft returned to base (at great expense | to Delta) on multiple occasions is _because_ they are | extremely cautious. | inferiorhuman wrote: | Not YET | | Do you even know what the problems were or how the dispatch | reliability of N195DN compares to Delta's other 767-300s? | There are any number of non-safety-related reasons a plane | might return to the gate, especially on a long haul flight | e.g. problems with the toilets. | | Take a deep breath. Nothing with N195DN was a close call. | cjrp wrote: | > "With immediate effect, Delta Air Lines is being advised not to | dispatch the B767-332 with registration number N195DN for flights | to Accra." | | That doesn't sound like it's banned to me; more like they're just | pressuring Delta to use a different aircraft. | michaelsshaw wrote: | No, re-read it. "Advised" as in being told. Ghana has told | Delta explicitly to not dispatch N195DN to Accra. | tomatotomato37 wrote: | It should be note that even if all these malfunctions were minor | and non-hazardous having a plane divert multiple multiple times | would still cause an administrative nightmare ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-26 23:00 UTC)